date:20160926

[Bug 1379025] perl-PDF-Reuse-0.37 is available

2016-09-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379025

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-PDF-Reuse-0.37-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-eecb5bc2b5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report

2016-09-26 Thread updates

The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 838  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626   
puppet-2.7.26-1.el5
 687  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3849   
sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5
 330  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-edbea40516   
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el5
 302  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-582c8075e6   
thttpd-2.25b-24.el5
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-f724258766   
irssi-0.8.20-2.el5


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing

drupal7-entity-1.8-1.el5
irssi-0.8.20-2.el5

Details about builds:



 drupal7-entity-1.8-1.el5 (FEDORA-EPEL-2016-500ad6cf23)
 Extends the entity API to provide a unified way to deal with entities

Update Information:

[7.x-1.8](https://www.drupal.org/project/entity/releases/7.x-1.8)

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1378632 - None
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378632




 irssi-0.8.20-2.el5 (FEDORA-EPEL-2016-f724258766)
 Modular text mode IRC client with Perl scripting

Update Information:

Security fix for CVE-2016-7553.

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1379270 - CVE-2016-7553 irssi: Information disclosure in buf.pl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379270

___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1374879] perl-Config-Grammar-1.12 is available

2016-09-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374879

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Config-Grammar-1.12-1. |perl-Config-Grammar-1.12-1.
   |fc25|fc25
   ||perl-Config-Grammar-1.12-1.
   ||fc24



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Config-Grammar-1.12-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1372503] perl-Sereal-3.015 is available

2016-09-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372503

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Sereal-3.015-1.fc26|perl-Sereal-3.015-1.fc26
   |perl-Sereal-3.015-1.fc25|perl-Sereal-3.015-1.fc25
   |perl-Sereal-3.015-1.fc24|perl-Sereal-3.015-1.fc24
   ||perl-Sereal-3.015-1.el7



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Sereal-3.015-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1372505] perl-Sereal-Encoder-3.015 is available

2016-09-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372505

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Sereal-Encoder-3.015-1 |perl-Sereal-Encoder-3.015-1
   |.fc26   |.fc26
   |perl-Sereal-Encoder-3.015-1 |perl-Sereal-Encoder-3.015-1
   |.fc25   |.fc25
   |perl-Sereal-Encoder-3.015-1 |perl-Sereal-Encoder-3.015-1
   |.fc24   |.fc24
   ||perl-Sereal-Encoder-3.015-1
   ||.el7



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Sereal-Encoder-3.015-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1372504] perl-Sereal-Decoder-3.015 is available

2016-09-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372504

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Sereal-Decoder-3.015-1 |perl-Sereal-Decoder-3.015-1
   |.fc26   |.fc26
   |perl-Sereal-Decoder-3.015-1 |perl-Sereal-Decoder-3.015-1
   |.fc25   |.fc25
   |perl-Sereal-Decoder-3.015-1 |perl-Sereal-Decoder-3.015-1
   |.fc24   |.fc24
   |perl-Sereal-Decoder-3.015-1 |perl-Sereal-Decoder-3.015-1
   |.fc23   |.fc23
   ||perl-Sereal-Decoder-3.015-1
   ||.el7



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Sereal-Decoder-3.015-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Orphaning avogadro

2016-09-26 Thread Kevin Kofler

Hi,

I am hereby orphaning the avogadro package (and am going to hit the
corresponding button in pkgdb after sending this message).

Avogadro is an advanced molecular editor for chemistry. It can be used both as a
standalone application and as a library. The latter is notably used by Kalzium,
the KDE periodic table (which is part of kdeedu), for its molecule viewer.

I originally picked up this package because it is a dependency of Kalzium, which
I was comaintaining at the time. Unfortunately, considering that:
* I never really used the standalone Avogadro application,
* I did not even use the Kalzium molecule viewer enough to be familiar with it,
* I do not even comaintain Kalzium anymore, and
* I do not have time to keep up with new upstream releases of Avogadro,
I have come to the conclusion that I am not the right person to maintain this
package.

The Rawhide package of Avogadro is at version 1.1.1. Upstream has an 1.2.0
release on SourceForge:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/avogadro/files/avogadro/1.2.0/
(The release is unfortunately NOT announced on the avogadro.cc site.) The new
maintainer will likely want to import the new version. However, he/she should
also ensure that Kalzium still keeps working with the updated library. (That is
the issue with this being both an application and a library.)

WARNING: The Avogadro project also has something called "Avogadro2". Kalzium is
NOT compatible with Avogadro2 at this time. I have also been told that the
Avogadro2 standalone application is also still missing features from Avogadro
(1). So it is NOT a good idea to replace Avogadro with Avogadro2. (If you want
Avogadro2 in Fedora, please submit a separate review request for it.) You have
been warned.

Thank you for your understanding,
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity WG

2016-09-26 Thread jkurik

Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
   Modularity WG on 2016-09-27 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
   At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net

The meeting will be about:
Meeting for the Modularity Working Group.

More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki 
page](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Modularity_Working_Group)

The agenda for the meeting is available at [modularity-wg-agendas 
pad](http://piratepad.nl/modularity-wg-agendas).



Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/4407/

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Orphaning vdr-streamdev

2016-09-26 Thread Felix Kaechele

Hi,

I'm orphaning vdr-streamdev since I no longer use it. There shouldn't be any 
open issues with this one.

Also, this was the package that initially got me sponsored :)

Regards,
Felix
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 25 Beta Freeze

2016-09-26 Thread Mohan Boddu

Hi all,


Today is an important day on the Fedora 25 schedule[1], with two
significant cut-offs.


Today is the Beta freeze[2]. This means that only packages which fix
accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs[3][4] will be marked as
'stable' and included in the Beta composes. Other builds will remain
in updates-testing until the Beta release is approved, at which point
the Beta freeze is lifted and packages can move to 'stable' as usual
until the Final freeze.


Finally, Today is the '100% code complete deadline' Change
Checkpoint[5], meaning that Fedora 24 Changes must now be code
complete, meaning all the code required to enable to the new change is
finished. The level of code completeness is reflected as tracker bug
state ON_QA. The change does not have to be fully tested by this
deadline'.


Regards


Mohan Boddu


[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/25/Schedule

[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Milestone_freezes

[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process

[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process

[5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Policy
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 25 Beta Freeze

2016-09-26 Thread Mohan Boddu

Hi all,


Today is an important day on the Fedora 25 schedule[1], with two
significant cut-offs.


Today is the Beta freeze[2]. This means that only packages which fix
accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs[3][4] will be marked as
'stable' and included in the Beta composes. Other builds will remain
in updates-testing until the Beta release is approved, at which point
the Beta freeze is lifted and packages can move to 'stable' as usual
until the Final freeze.


Finally, Today is the '100% code complete deadline' Change
Checkpoint[5], meaning that Fedora 24 Changes must now be code
complete, meaning all the code required to enable to the new change is
finished. The level of code completeness is reflected as tracker bug
state ON_QA. The change does not have to be fully tested by this
deadline'.


Regards


Mohan Boddu


[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/25/Schedule

[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Milestone_freezes

[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process

[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process

[5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Policy
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Orphaning dansguardian

2016-09-26 Thread Felix Kaechele

Hi there,

I'm orphaning dansguardian. Upstream has been largely dormant and I haven't 
been using it for several years.
The package has some co-maintainers who also haven't been very active.

Feel free to pick-up the package, but bear in mind it needs some fixing.

Regards,
Felix
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: dnf update args and wiki update

2016-09-26 Thread Adam Williamson

On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 01:54 +0300, Catalin wrote:
> Dear team.
> 
> About dnf -help under I used fc25 .
> I don't see the update argument output of command: dnf --help.
> The dnf  args is in progress ?

Officially the command is 'upgrade', and 'update' is just a 'deprecated
alias'. This is made explicit in 'man dnf':

   Upgrade Command
   dnf [options] upgrade
  Updates each package to the latest version that is both available 
and resolvable.

   Update Command
   dnf [options] update
  Deprecated alias for the Upgrade Command.

The 'dnf --help' output, being shorter, only lists the 'official' name
- 'upgrade' - and doesn't mention 'update'.

> Also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade is not updated.
> Most users do not know all the changes and do not have time to dig. We
> should therefore updated with the changes.

What changes? This is not new, and doesn't have anything to do with
'system upgrade', which is a different command. AFAIK there is nothing
wrong with any of the instructions on that page, they apply fully to
current Fedora.

Unless you just mean that the page said 'dnf update' not 'dnf upgrade',
in which case yeah, I guess theoretically it should have said
'upgrade'. But practically speaking I doubt they'll ever be able to
remove the 'deprecated alias' from dnf, since it'll be in about a
bajillion people's scripts (and we're all still used to it from 'yum
update', and anyway 'update' is a much better word than 'upgrade' so
they're just wrong anyway, jeez, c'mon folks). And again, this is not
new, dnf has claimed that update is 'deprecated' since 2012:

https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/commit/91a92b01172ce03ff2cc8836622842c48534d905
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1374879] perl-Config-Grammar-1.12 is available

2016-09-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374879

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Config-Grammar-1.12-1.
   ||fc25
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-09-26 20:38:45



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Config-Grammar-1.12-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1376996] perl-DateTime-1.39 is available

2016-09-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376996
Bug 1376996 depends on bug 1377252, which changed state.

Bug 1377252 Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-ValidationCompiler - Build an 
optimized subroutine parameter validator once, use it forever
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377252

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1376997] perl-DateTime-Locale-1.08 is available

2016-09-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376997
Bug 1376997 depends on bug 1377252, which changed state.

Bug 1377252 Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-ValidationCompiler - Build an 
optimized subroutine parameter validator once, use it forever
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377252

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1376998] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.03 is available

2016-09-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376998
Bug 1376998 depends on bug 1377252, which changed state.

Bug 1377252 Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-ValidationCompiler - Build an 
optimized subroutine parameter validator once, use it forever
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377252

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1377428] perl Datetime::Format::Pg doesn' t handle fractions of a second.

2016-09-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377428

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-Format-Pg-0.1 |perl-DateTime-Format-Pg-0.1
   |6012-2.fc26 |6012-2.fc26
   ||perl-DateTime-Format-Pg-0.1
   ||6012-2.fc25
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-09-26 20:36:44



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DateTime-Format-Pg-0.16012-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1378061] perl-Log-Report-1.17 is available

2016-09-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378061

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-Log-Report-1.17-1.fc26 |perl-Log-Report-1.17-1.fc26
   ||perl-Log-Report-1.17-1.fc25
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-09-26 20:34:10



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Log-Report-1.17-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1378062] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160920 is available

2016-09-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378062

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2016 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2016
   |0920-1.fc26 |0920-1.fc26
   |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2016 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2016
   |0920-1.fc24 |0920-1.fc24
   ||perl-Module-CoreList-5.2016
   ||0920-1.fc25



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160920-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

dnf update args and wiki update

2016-09-26 Thread Catalin

Dear team.

About dnf -help under I used fc25 .
I don't see the update argument output of command: dnf --help.
The dnf  args is in progress ?

Also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade is not updated.
Most users do not know all the changes and do not have time to dig. We
should therefore updated with the changes.

Thank you. Regards.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1378192] Upstream bug causes attachments to fail with " Invalid Encoding" error.

2016-09-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378192

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ON_QA



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Mail-Sender-0.8.23-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-5292585bf8

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: A tale of systemd and MaxProcs

2016-09-26 Thread Matthew Miller

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 03:53:53PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Ack. I run a lot of builds on rawhide, but none of my systems is large
> enough to hit such issues. From my side I'll try to watch out for
> changes in systemd and that change resource or privilege limitations
> that could affect large systems.

Thanks! I really appreciate the extra effort.

-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: duplicate package on fresh install

2016-09-26 Thread stan

On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 11:23:53 -0700
stan  wrote:


> dnf remove $(dnf repoquery --installonly --latest-limit -3 -q)

This is wrong! I copied the wrong line.  The actual command should be

dnf remove $(dnf repoquery --duplicated --latest-limit -1 -q)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 25-20160926.n.0 compose check report

2016-09-26 Thread Adam Williamson

On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 16:23 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
> 
> Xfce raw-xz armhfp
> Cloud_base raw-xz i386
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
> 
> Failed openQA tests: 9/102 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
> 
> New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20160925.n.0):
> 
> ID: 36378 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_update_cli
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36378

So again typing at the console had a problem. I think I might tweak the
test to wait for the system to be idle before running that command, it
may help...

> ID: 36379 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36379

This one is interesting, it seems like GNOME Software really had some
kind of problem refreshing the available updates. I'll have to look at
the logs and see if there's a definite bug to report.

> ID: 36382 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36382

GNOME actually crashed from the live desktop back to GDM while the test
was idling: this test just sits at the desktop for 10 minutes to see if
any notifications show up, during those 10 minutes, the system crashed
back to gdm. Three crash logs show up, for GNOME Shell, gjs and
evolution-alarm-notify. The GNOME Shell crash I filed as:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379440

> ID: 36386 Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36386

This one, again, crashed. The install succeeded, the test then proceeds
to boot the installed system and log in as the 'test' user (created
during install) and click through gnome-initial-setup. It crashed back
to GDM from gnome-initial-setup. I'll file the crash.

> ID: 36433 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space@uefi
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36433

This one's a bit odd, it just flat out failed to go anywhere at all
from the bootloader. Never seen that before and other UEFI tests in the
run (which should not behave differently at the point of just booting
the installer) worked fine, so this is probably just magic pixies.

> ID: 36444 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36444

This is that same test timing issue I wrote about the other day, I have
a change that should avoid this happening under review ATM.

> ID: 36445 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36445

This is actually kinda the same thing (don't want to bore people with
the details of how our openQA tests decide when they've reached a login
screen) and would also be fixed by my patch. These two tests passed on
staging, which is running my patch.

> ID: 36468 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36468

This test just flat out failed to boot the base image (an F23 KDE
install). Not sure what's up there, might just be one-off magic pixies,
I'll see if the image got regenerated last night or anything.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: duplicate package on fresh install

2016-09-26 Thread stan

On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 06:07:56 -
Samuel Rakitničan  wrote:

> Reinstall or any other dnf operation except remove doesn't work,
> didn't try --rebuilddb. There are many cases of such broken state on
> forums, but system is usually working fine AFAICT. Is there a way to
> alter rpm database to remove one version of a package without
> altering the system?

If you look at  man yum2dnf, it tells you the equivalent commands under
dnf for yum commands.  What you are trying to do is clean dupes.  These
are the appropriate commands for dnf, from that man page.

package-cleanup --dupes  
is now   
dnf repoquery --duplicated
and
package-cleanup --cleandupes  
is now  
dnf remove $(dnf repoquery --installonly --latest-limit -3 -q)

I recall using this dnf command successfully, but it has been a long
time.  Another way of saying, be careful.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F26 System Wide Change: OpenSSL 1.1.0

2016-09-26 Thread Timothy Ward


HHello

Has there been any testing with libmobiledevice library and especially
the gvfs-afc backend to this be able to connect to an idevice using
nautilus etc. The testing needs to be done on both new IOS 10.0.1
and an older version say 6.3.5 on an older idevice iphone 4. to ensure
compatibility across 

A link to a github respository for libimobledevice and other related
libaries 

https://github.com/libimobiledevice

Have a look at the issues for problems with openssl etc

Regards

Timothy Ward


On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 10:09 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> 
> On So, 2016-09-24 at 00:52 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 11:37 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Well... we certainly need to port it sooner or later although I
> > > understand that effort will be quite non-trivial.
> > You mean port libp11? That's already working against OpenSSL 1.1,
> > isn't
> > it? We just need to ensure we can ship a version of libp11 — or at
> > least the engine — for both OpenSSL 1.1 and OpenSSL 1.0.2, if
> > we're
> > going to ship them both in parallel.
> 
> Ah, that's a good news. I did not get to try to rebuild it against
> OpenSSL1.1 yet.
> 
> My current plan is to not ship such engine-pkcs11 package. We should
> try to move everything to OpenSSL 1.1 and ship the 1.0.2 only as a
> compat package for third party binaries without -devel and any extra
> bells and whistles. It would be also temporarily used in Rawhide so
> it
> is installable but for that I think we can live with temporarily
> breaking PKCS#11 uri support.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: libgeos-3.4.2 Error: CentOS 7

2016-09-26 Thread Orion Poplawski

On 09/26/2016 06:41 AM, Jibran Khan wrote:
> I was trying to install PostGIS on CentOS7 (x64) based machine.
> 
> # sudo yum install postgis2_95 postgis2_95-client
> 
> But, got this error: 
> 
> Error:  Package: grass-libs-6.4.4-7.el7.x86_64 (@epel)
> 
>  Requires: libgeos-3.4.2.so()(64bit)
> 
> Removing: geos-3.4.2-2.el7.x86_64 (@epel) libgeos-3.4.2.so()(64bit)
> 
>  Updated By: geos-3.5.0-1.rhel7.x86_64 (pgdg95) ~libgeos-3.5.0.so()(64bit)
> 
>  Available: geos-3.4.2-1.rhel7.x86_64 (pgdg94)  libgeos-3.4.2.so()(64bit)
> 
> Available: geos-3.2.2-2.el6.x86_64 (elgis)
> 
>  ~libgeos-3.2.2.so()(64bit)  Available: geos-3.3.0-1.el6.x86_64 (elgis) 
> 
> ~libgeos-3.3.0.so()(64bit)  Available: geos-3.3.1-2.el6.x86_64 (elgis)
> 
>  ~libgeos-3.3.1.so()(64bit)  Available: geos-3.3.6-1_0.el6.x86_64 (elgis) 
> 
> ~libgeos-3.3.6.so()(64bit)  Available: geos-3.3.8-2.el6.x86_64 (elgis) 
> 
> ~libgeos-3.3.8.so()(64bit) 
...
> Not nice! Any help would be highly appreciated?

Looks like you are mixing several repositories (epel, elgis, pgdg94).  Unless
there are specific commitments to maintaining compatibility among
repositories, this generally leads to problems like the ones you are seeing.

You can try using yum-priorities and playing with different priorities for the
different repos, but this is difficult and error prone as well.

-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane   or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301   http://www.nwra.com
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 25-20160926.n.0 compose check report

2016-09-26 Thread Fedora compose checker

Missing expected images:

Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 9/102 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20160925.n.0):

ID: 36378   Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_update_cli
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36378
ID: 36379   Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36379
ID: 36382   Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36382
ID: 36386   Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36386
ID: 36433   Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36433
ID: 36444   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36444
ID: 36445   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36445
ID: 36468   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36468

Old failures (same test failed in 25-20160925.n.0):

ID: 36388   Test: x86_64 Atomic-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36388
ID: 36401   Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36401
ID: 36489   Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36489
ID: 36497   Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36497

Passed openQA tests: 93/102 (x86_64), 15/17 (i386)

Skipped openQA tests: 1 of 121
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Rawhide-20160926.n.0 compose check report

2016-09-26 Thread Fedora compose checker

Missing expected images:

Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 6/102 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20160924.n.0):

ID: 36258   Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36258
ID: 36323   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36323
ID: 36336   Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36336
ID: 36367   Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36367

Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20160924.n.0):

ID: 36266   Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36266
ID: 36267   Test: x86_64 Atomic-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36267
ID: 36280   Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36280
ID: 36357   Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36357
ID: 36358   Test: x86_64 universal install_rescue_encrypted
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36358
ID: 36368   Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36368

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/102 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test softfailed in Rawhide-20160924.n.0):

ID: 36274   Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/36274

Passed openQA tests: 95/102 (x86_64), 14/17 (i386)

Skipped openQA tests: 1 of 121
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: A tale of systemd and MaxProcs

2016-09-26 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 01:11:16PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 16:54:45 -
> "Timothy Ward"  wrote:
> 
> > Although I agree with the above then may be a builder should have a
> > rawhide VM running with these updated critical packages if only for
> > testing purposes to expose this type of failure. 
> 
> Sure, as I noted perhaps we should move some of the staging ones to
> branched or rawhide. But thats just the start/easy part. Then someone
> has to watch for failed builds, sort out which ones are caused by
> package error or other packages or whatever and find the few caused by
> the builder state and track them down. 
> 
> So, basically it's this problem x N. I personally don't have many free
> hours a week to devote to this, and I doubt the kernel maintainers do
> either. :) 
> 
> > The other concerns is that the package should have issued some sort
> > of critical error message to the appropriate log before the limit was
> > reached. and then start shutting down or limiting the process's or
> > threads running. Is easy to say but may be a lot harder to actually
> > achieve.
> 
> Yep. Would be nice, not sure how hard it is to do. 
>  
> > Although the change was communicated there needs to be a process that
> > effective communication of these sorts of changes is sent to ensure
> > that it will be picked up by more than just the fedora team leader
> > which already has a fairly big workload.
> 
> Well, the change was communicated only in the NEWS file burried in
> a bunch of other changes. 
> > 
> > It is a corner case at the extreme end as most testers probably would
> > not have the hardware or knowledge to test effectively. Supplying
> > info on how to test effectively may be a solution but will require
> > someone to do it.
> > 
> > But I feel Kevin's and others involved frustration and the amount of
> > time that trouble-shooting this would have taken.
> 
> Yeah, I just want to try and improve things so perhaps it doesn't
> happen again/as much/as soon. 

Ack. I run a lot of builds on rawhide, but none of my systems is large
enough to hit such issues. From my side I'll try to watch out for
changes in systemd and that change resource or privilege limitations
that could affect large systems.

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: A tale of systemd and MaxProcs

2016-09-26 Thread Matthew Miller

On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 06:34:36PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > far-reaching infrastructure packages (systemd, glibc, kernel, whatever)
> > that any new restrictions or constraints should be disabled by default
> > in Fedora, regardless of upstream defaults, until we're able to have a
> > conversation — here, in the edition WGs, and/or in FESCo, as
> > appropriate for the particular change.
> Every change of this type is a judgement call. Most of such changes
> don't cause any issues and if FESCo wanted to review every one it
> would be swamped with useless work (apart from systemd, at least
> selinux introduce new restrictions every once in a while).

I hope that this kind of change is not actually intended to be so
frequent that "swamped" would apply!

(And I agree that the same thing should apply to selinux changes which
apply globally. Per-service restrictions should be coordinated with the
maintainers of that particular service and raised to FESCo and WGs as
appropriate.)



-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

/sbin/nologin in /etc/shells

2016-09-26 Thread Jakub Svoboda

Hi,

nologin is listed in /etc/shells since 2002 [1].

This is in conflict with:

man 5 shells
DESCRIPTION
/etc/shells is a text file which contains the full pathnames of
valid
login shells.

man 8 nologin
DESCRIPTION
nologin displays a message that an account is not available and
exits
non-zero. It is intended as a replacement shell field to deny
login
access to an account.
NOTES
nologin is a per-account way to disable login (usually used for
system
accounts like http or ftp).

man 1 su
OPTIONS
-s, --shell=shell
Run the specified shell instead of the default.
[snip]
If the target user has a restricted shell (i.e. not listed
in
/etc/shells), the --shell option and the SHELL environment
vari‐
ables are ignored unless the calling user is root.

Actual behavior and man pages are consistent for su and nologin and their
behavior is affected indirectly by /etc/shells. The inconsistency lies in
/etc/shells containing nologin and man 5 shells semantically telling the
opposite.

Let's fix it.

The stated reason for including nologin in shells is "so that 'chsh' and
other tools will allow its use without manual edit of /etc/passwd" [1].
This is argument is inaccurate. Tests on RHEL 6.0 and fc24 showed that the
man page for chsh is correct - when /sbin/nologin is not in /etc/shells,
root can successfully run chsh -s /sbin/nologin username. It prints a
warning but it does change the default shell to /sbin/nologin. man 1 chsh:

VALID SHELLS
chsh will accept the full pathname of any executable file on the
sys‐
tem. However, it will issue a warning if the shell is not listed
in
the /etc/shells file. On the other hand, it can also be
configured
such that it will only accept shells listed in this file, unless
you
are root.

Removing /sbin/nologin from /etc/shells would prohibit a regular user to
set /sbin/nologin as the default shell for themselves - an action that
makes little sense.

/sbin/nologin being in /etc/shells poses security and logical problems:

- su -s /bin/bash - nologinuser (if "nologinuser" has /sbin/nologin as the
default shell) succeeds with /bin/bash if auth is successful [2], even
though man 1 su, man 8 nologin, and man 5 shells suggest that such a user
is a restricted user and logging in with an alternate specified shell
should be forbidden.

- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Security Guide advises [3] that /sbin/nologin
should be used to prevent direct login to an account - the root account in
this example. Presumably, this should be prevented in the case where the
attacker has valid login credentials for the account. In that very case,
however, the attacker can use an ordinary account to run su -s /bin/bash -
root because the protection for this very attack present in su is rendered
useless by /sbin/nologin being listed in /etc/shells.

- selinux has a workaround for /sbin/nologin -
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-May/msg00893.html

- gdm has a workaround for /sbin/nologin -
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-May/msg00894.html

- Debian doesn't list nologin in /etc/shells. An opinion from a Debian
developer [4]: "The point of having a shell that's not in /etc/shells isn't
that you can't use it to log in, but that it's not a normal shell and that
users with that shell set can't change it to something else. Adding nologin
to /etc/shells would be very likely to open security vulnerabilities, and I
will not do it."

It seems as though /sbin/nologin is listed in /etc/shells as a workaround
to some issues without even documenting it in the man pages. These issues
are not important enough for those distributions and OSes that don't list
/sbin/nologin in /etc/shells. Maybe fedora should be on the same boat.

The rabbit hole of the past bugs and discussions about this starts here [5].

This is a bug that either lies solely in the setup package (which lists
/sbin/nologin in the /etc/shells file) or it is an inter-package bug where
multiple packages that are correct on their own exhibit an incorrect
behavior together. In any case, it is clear *something* is wrong here.

What can we do to fix this issue or to at least to make man pages
consistent with the actual behavior? Are there serious reasons to continue
listing /sbin/nologin in /etc/shells?

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=53963
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378893#c0
[3]
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/Security_Guide/sec-Controlling_Root_Access.html#sec-Disallowing_Root_Access
[4] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=419132#32
[5] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378893#c1

Thanks,

--
Jakub Svoboda / Red Hat Product Security
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To

2016-09-12 Fedora QA Devel Meeting Minutes

2016-09-26 Thread Tim Flink

=
#fedora-meeting-1: fedora-qadevel
=

Minutes: 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-09-26/fedora-qadevel.2016-09-26-14.00.html
Minutes (text): 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-09-26/fedora-qadevel.2016-09-26-14.00.txt
Log: 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-09-26/fedora-qadevel.2016-09-26-14.00.log.html


Meeting summary
---
* roll call  (tflink, 14:00:39)

* Announcements and Information  (tflink, 14:07:01)
  * got CI to generate docs and releases in stg - tflink  (tflink,
14:07:38)
  * LINK: https://qa.stg.fedoraproject.org/docs/   (tflink, 14:07:39)
  * LINK: https://qa.stg.fedoraproject.org/releases/   (tflink,
14:07:39)
  * created task-rpmdeplint to replace task-depcheck - mkrizek  (tflink,
14:07:39)
  * LINK: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1008   (tflink,
14:07:39)
  * resultsdb_frontend and execdb packages approved - mkrizek  (tflink,
14:07:40)
  * AGREED: while the reviewer for execdb does have a point about any
future python3 migration, we don't think maintaining both python2
and python3 versions of execdb are likely and the risk of having
problems with that is something we're willing to deal with  (tflink,
14:16:53)

* Docker Testing Status  (tflink, 14:18:33)

* Trigger Re-Write Status  (tflink, 14:25:19)
  * LINK: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D963   (tflink,
14:25:55)

* Dist-Git Task Storage Proposal  (tflink, 14:27:15)
  * LINK:

https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/w/taskotron/new_distgit_task_storage_proposal/
(tflink, 14:27:32)

* CI Generated Document URLs  (tflink, 14:33:45)

* Packaging Status  (tflink, 14:35:20)

* Resultsdb 2.0  (tflink, 14:42:51)
  * LINK: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D999   (tflink,
14:42:52)

* Open Floor  (tflink, 14:44:12)

Meeting ended at 14:51:04 UTC.




Action Items






Action Items, by person
---
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---
* tflink (83)
* kparal (23)
* mkrizek (14)
* garretraziel (9)
* zodbot (5)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot


pgp3yRSikRqPK.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 49878 - Fix CI tests to account for new error logging

2016-09-26 Thread Mark Reynolds

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48978

https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48978/0001-Ticket-48978-Fix-CI-test-to-account-for-new-logging-.patch
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reviews Weekly

2016-09-26 Thread nobody

Start Date: 2016-09-19 10:08:02.157981
End Date: 2016-09-26 10:08:02.157981

gil cattaneo : 5

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379093 
python-pickleshare
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378021 jetty-alpn
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379090 python-qtconsole
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378971 f25-backgrounds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378077 
jetty-test-helper


Jitka Plesnikova : 2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377228 
perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377252 
perl-Params-ValidationCompiler


Paul Wouters : 2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377876 jose
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377877 luksmeta


Tim Flink : 2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376869 gap-pkg-lpres
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373666 hddfancontrol


Alexander Kurtakov : 1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369224 
jackson-modules-base


Ben Rosser : 1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346245 
resultsdb_frontend


Charalampos Stratakis : 1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373486 python34


Christoph Junghans : 1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290337 ed25519-java


Fl@sh : 1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378445 kf5-kirigami


Igor Gnatenko : 1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377733 
systemd-bootchart


Jerry James : 1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346243 execdb


Luya Tshimbalanga : 1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290339 curve25519-java


Mukundan Ragavan : 1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366845 reactor


Nathaniel McCallum : 1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378160 
jitterentropy-rngd


Neal Gompa : 1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375926 python-nose2


Parag AN(पराग) : 1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377812 
python-sphinxcontrib-blockdiag


Petr Menšík : 1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376899 pcaudiolib


Petr Pisar : 1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378014 perl-IO-FDPass


Randy Barlow : 1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369534 libsass


Sandro Mani : 1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977116  pgmodeler


Simone Caronni : 1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374781 
python-sphinxcontrib-autoprogram



Completed Review Requests: 28
This report was generated by bz-review-report.py.
The original source is available at: 
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/triage.git/tree/scripts/bzReviewReport.py
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

2016-09-26 Thread nobody

Change in package status over the last 168 hours


2 packages were orphaned

oflb-riordonfancy-fonts [master, f25, f24] was orphaned by till
 A stylized font
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/oflb-riordonfancy-fonts
python-wheel [el6] was orphaned by stardust85
 A built-package format for Python
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-wheel

9 packages were retired

docker-distribution [epel7] was retired by lsm5
 Docker toolset to pack, ship, store, and deliver content
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/docker-distribution
instack [master, f25] was retired by slagle
 OpenStack installation tool for diskimage-builder style elements
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/instack
jackson-datatype-guava [f25] was retired by gil
 Add-on module for Jackson JSON processor which handles Guava data-types
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/jackson-datatype-guava
jackson-module-afterburner [master, f25] was retired by gil
 Jackson module that uses byte-code generation to further speed up data 
binding
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/jackson-module-afterburner
jackson-module-mrbean [master, f25] was retired by gil
 An extension that implements support for POJO type materialization
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/jackson-module-mrbean
kf5-akonadi [f25] was retired by dvratil
 The Akonadi client libraries
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/kf5-akonadi
os-cloud-config [master, f25] was retired by slagle
 Configuration for OpenStack clouds
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/os-cloud-config
perl-Data-Alias [f25] was retired by pghmcfc
 Comprehensive set of aliasing operations
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Data-Alias
rubygem-audited-activerecord [master, f25] was retired by vondruch
 Log all changes to your ActiveRecord models
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rubygem-audited-activerecord

2 packages unorphaned
-
maniadrive [f25] was unorphaned by sergiomb
 3D stunt driving game
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/maniadrive
xcf-pixbuf-loader [f23, master, f25, f24] was unorphaned by yselkowitz
 XCF (GIMP) image loader for GTK+ applications
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/xcf-pixbuf-loader

0 packages were unretired


2 packages were given

mongodb [f23, master, f25, f24, epel7, el5] was given by hhorak to mskalick
 High-performance, schema-free document-oriented database
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/mongodb
rubygem-jgrep [f23, master, el6, epel7] was given by lkundrak to domcleal
 Filter JSON documents with a simple logical language
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rubygem-jgrep

0 packages had new branches



Sources: https://github.com/pypingou/fedora-owner-change
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

2016-09-26 Thread buildsys



perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On aarch64:
perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-1.fc26.noarch requires root-core
Please resolve this as soon as possible.

___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

2016-09-26 Thread buildsys



perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On aarch64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.aarch64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit)
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.aarch64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit)
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires libperl.so.5.22
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On armhfp:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.armv7hl requires libperl.so.5.22
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.armv7hl requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.

___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

86 matches

Mail list logo