Re: libkpmcore soname bump in rawhide

[Kevin Kofler]

Mattia Verga wrote:
> I will update kpmcore in rawhide to latest development version, so there
> will be a soname bump.
> 
> Packages affected are kde-partitionmanager (which I will rebuild) and
> calamares.

I built a snapshot of Calamares master (with support for the new kpmcore) in 
Rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=817259

I expect this to get released around the same time as KPM.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Announcement: Python 3 port of livecd-creator (was: Re: Announcement: DNF port of livecd-creator)

[Kevin Kofler]

Hi,

FYI, Neal Gompa has now put up a Copr with the DNF + Python 3 version of the 
livecd-tools:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ngompa/livecd-creator/

Enjoy,
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Rawhide-20161112.n.1 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
Kde live i386

Failed openQA tests: 56/79 (x86_64), 15/15 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161108.n.1):

ID: 47530   Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47530
ID: 47598   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47598
ID: 47599   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47599
ID: 47617   Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47617

Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20161108.n.1):

ID: 47524   Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47524
ID: 47525   Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47525
ID: 47526   Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47526
ID: 47527   Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47527
ID: 47528   Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47528
ID: 47529   Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47529
ID: 47532   Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47532
ID: 47533   Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47533
ID: 47534   Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47534
ID: 47535   Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47535
ID: 47541   Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47541
ID: 47542   Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47542
ID: 47551   Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47551
ID: 47553   Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47553
ID: 47554   Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47554
ID: 47555   Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_minimal
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47555
ID: 47556   Test: x86_64 universal install_anaconda_text
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47556
ID: 47558   Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47558
ID: 47559   Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47559
ID: 47560   Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47560
ID: 47561   Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47561
ID: 47562   Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47562
ID: 47563   Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_user_creation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47563
ID: 47564   Test: x86_64 universal install_scsi_updates_img
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47564
ID: 47565   Test: x86_64 universal install_multi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47565
ID: 47566   Test: x86_64 universal install_multi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47566
ID: 47567   Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47567
ID: 47568   Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47568
ID: 47569   Test: x86_64 universal install_multi_empty
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47569
ID: 47570   Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47570
ID: 47571   Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_partial
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47571
ID: 47572   Test: x86_64 universal install_btrfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47572
ID: 47573   Test: x86_64 universal install_ext3
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47573
ID: 47574   Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47574
ID: 47575   Test: x86_64 universal install_lvmthin
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47575
ID: 47576   Test: x86_64 universal install_no_swap
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47576
ID: 47577   Test: x86_64 universal install

Announcement: Python 3 port of livecd-creator (was: Re: Announcement: DNF port of livecd-creator)

[Kevin Kofler]

Hi,

I wrote:
> remix authors rejoice: I have ported the old livecd-creator from yum to
> dnf (in one night):
> https://github.com/kkofler/livecd-tools
> (The other tools in the package were also ported away from yum and its
> rpmUtils to dnf, but livecd-creator was the main user of yum stuff.)

Now, after a 12-hour porting session with Neal Gompa (he did the porting, I 
the testing), the code is finally working with Python 3 too!

https://github.com/kkofler/livecd-tools

Python 2 is still supported. You need Python 2 ≥ 2.6 or Python 3 ≥ 3.3. I 
tested with:
python-2.7.12-6.fc24.x86_64
python3-3.5.2-3.fc24.x86_64

The Python 3 port is of course based on the DNF port. (The old YUM does not 
support Python 3.)

So this issue:
> * It is still using Python 2, and thus needs python2-dnf (which nothing
>   else needs). If somebody feels like porting it to Python 3, that should
>   be easy now that it uses dnf, so please feel free. I would be happy to
>   take a pull request for that.
is now addressed. The other caveats still stand though.

Enjoy,
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: MP3 in Fedora by default?

[Jonny Heggheim]

> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/gstreamer1-plugin-mpg123/
Typo:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/mpg123/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: MP3 in Fedora by default?

[Jonny Heggheim]

Ms Sanchez:
> Is it Fedora coming with MP3 decoders by default now? Does anyone has an
> official source for this?
Two MP3 packages just showed up in the package list:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/gstreamer1-plugin-mpg123/

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/gstreamer1-plugin-mpg123/

Jonny



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: MP3 in Fedora by default?

[Peter Robinson]

On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Michael Catanzaro  wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 18:26 +0100, Ms Sanchez wrote:
>> Oh..! Now I see why the new didn't reach me, I'm not in the legal
>> list.
>> So, Fedora 25 will come with MP3 decoders by default, right? That's
>> pretty nice and should be highlighted somewhere...  like the
>> Magazine
>> and social media.
>>
>> Thanks and cheers,
>> Sylvia
>
> No, it will probably be available by default in *F26*. For F25 you'll
> have to get it from GNOME Software or the missing codec installer.

Or "dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing gstreamer1-plugin-mpg123"
once it lands in testing.

Peter
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: MP3 in Fedora by default?

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 18:26 +0100, Ms Sanchez wrote:
> Oh..! Now I see why the new didn't reach me, I'm not in the legal
> list.  
> So, Fedora 25 will come with MP3 decoders by default, right? That's 
> pretty nice and should be highlighted somewhere...  like the
> Magazine 
> and social media.
> 
> Thanks and cheers,
> Sylvia

No, it will probably be available by default in *F26*. For F25 you'll
have to get it from GNOME Software or the missing codec installer.

Michael
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: RFC (round 2): Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

[Dennis Gilmore]

On Friday, November 11, 2016 11:12:51 AM CST Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> 3) My original proposal was: change the fallback name to Fedora- by
> default, while of course retaining the ability to set it manually.

I think this is terrible, Just because if you are on a system with a small 
resoultion, say 800x600 the command prompt will take up half the screen. 

> 4) The specific issue relating to FreeIPA and Active Directory is one of
> uniqueness: you can only have one machine named "localhost" enrolled in a
> domain. A user who is unaware of the hostname at all will not know to change
> it ahead of time.

can we add a flag to set the hostname at enrollment time?

I guess I am unusual in setting all of my host names at install/initial 
configuration time.

Dennis


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: RFC (round 2): Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On 12 November 2016 at 13:14, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
 wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 11:17:39AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> On 11 November 2016 at 22:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>>  wrote:
>> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 01:20:26PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>> >> I can't think of a reason why we'd need a cryptographically secure
>> >> transformation just to generate a random hostname.
>> >
>> > We want it cryptographically secure to preserve the machine-id. It's
>> > probably not too important in itself, but it's a good idea to keep
>> > it hidden because other hashes might be generated from it.
>>
>> Which lies in the problem. If people are going to derive hashes from
>> it they will do so any way the want and most likely it will be leaked
>> out by someone doing a sum  or just copying it etc. If there is
>> something 'unique' on a system, it will leak out eventually. All you
>> can do is try to design to drip out slowly or pour out all at once.
>> Trying to find some happy middle ground ends up usually with it
>> pouring out all at once when no one expected it.
>
> True. But one, it's not *that* important, it's not the root password
> or anything. But two, it'd say that we're designing it to drip out very
> very slowly.

Until someone decides that deriving the root password from the
machine-id is a good idea. In the end, I have said my piece.. you guys
have fun.

> Zbyszek
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: RFC (round 2): Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 11:17:39AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 11 November 2016 at 22:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>  wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 01:20:26PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> 
> >> I can't think of a reason why we'd need a cryptographically secure
> >> transformation just to generate a random hostname.
> >
> > We want it cryptographically secure to preserve the machine-id. It's
> > probably not too important in itself, but it's a good idea to keep
> > it hidden because other hashes might be generated from it.
> 
> Which lies in the problem. If people are going to derive hashes from
> it they will do so any way the want and most likely it will be leaked
> out by someone doing a sum  or just copying it etc. If there is
> something 'unique' on a system, it will leak out eventually. All you
> can do is try to design to drip out slowly or pour out all at once.
> Trying to find some happy middle ground ends up usually with it
> pouring out all at once when no one expected it.

True. But one, it's not *that* important, it's not the root password
or anything. But two, it'd say that we're designing it to drip out very
very slowly.

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: MP3 in Fedora by default?

[Tomasz Torcz]

On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 06:12:52PM +0100, Antonio Trande wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/12/2016 05:57 PM, Ms Sanchez wrote:
> > 
> > Hello everyone!
> > 
> > I just read this and wondered if it has any real basis. 
> > 
> > 
> > http://lwn.net/Articles/706155/
> > 
> > Is it Fedora coming with MP3 decoders by default now? Does anyone has an
> > official source for this?
> > 
> > Cheers, Sylvia
> > 
> 
> Hi Sylvia.
> 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/PUCTFFYU5L2A3L7QVME7TOMX3R6WIO2F/

 This thread is pretty content-less. “Something may have changed, but we will
neither confirm nor deny it.  Or say what have changed if that's the case” to
paraphrase.


-- 
Tomasz Torcz   "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station
xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.plwagon filled with backup tapes." -- Jim Gray
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: MP3 in Fedora by default?

[Phil Wyett]

On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 17:57 +0100, Ms Sanchez wrote:
> 
> Hello everyone!
> 
> I just read this and wondered if it has any real basis.  
> 
> 
> http://lwn.net/Articles/706155/
> 
> Is it Fedora coming with MP3 decoders by default now? Does anyone has
> an official source for this?
> 
> Cheers, Sylvia
> 

Hi,

mpg123 and the gstreamer plugin were booked into fedora for building for
>= 25 yesterday by wtaymans.

Regards

Phil

-- 

Google+: https://goo.gl/CPjvNo
Blog: https://philwyett-hemi.blogspot.co.uk/
GitLab: https://gitlab.com/philwyett_hemi/




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: MP3 in Fedora by default?

[Ms Sanchez]

On 12/11/16 18:12, Antonio Trande wrote:


On 11/12/2016 05:57 PM, Ms Sanchez wrote:

Hello everyone!

I just read this and wondered if it has any real basis.


http://lwn.net/Articles/706155/

Is it Fedora coming with MP3 decoders by default now? Does anyone has an
official source for this?

Cheers, Sylvia


Hi Sylvia.

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/PUCTFFYU5L2A3L7QVME7TOMX3R6WIO2F/





Oh..! Now I see why the new didn't reach me, I'm not in the legal list.  
So, Fedora 25 will come with MP3 decoders by default, right? That's 
pretty nice and should be highlighted somewhere...  like the Magazine 
and social media.


Thanks and cheers,
Sylvia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: MP3 in Fedora by default?

[Antonio Trande]

On 11/12/2016 05:57 PM, Ms Sanchez wrote:
> 
> Hello everyone!
> 
> I just read this and wondered if it has any real basis. 
> 
> 
> http://lwn.net/Articles/706155/
> 
> Is it Fedora coming with MP3 decoders by default now? Does anyone has an
> official source for this?
> 
> Cheers, Sylvia
> 

Hi Sylvia.

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/PUCTFFYU5L2A3L7QVME7TOMX3R6WIO2F/

-- 
---
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: 0x6CE6D08A
Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: MP3 in Fedora by default?

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 17:57 +0100, Ms Sanchez wrote:
> Is it Fedora coming with MP3 decoders by default now?

Probably in F26, yes.

> Does anyone has an 
> official source for this?

Christian Schaller is an official source. :)

Michael
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

MP3 in Fedora by default?

[Ms Sanchez]

Hello everyone!

I just read this and wondered if it has any real basis.


http://lwn.net/Articles/706155/

Is it Fedora coming with MP3 decoders by default now? Does anyone has an 
official source for this?


Cheers, Sylvia




___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: RFC (round 2): Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On 11 November 2016 at 22:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
 wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 01:20:26PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:

>> I can't think of a reason why we'd need a cryptographically secure
>> transformation just to generate a random hostname.
>
> We want it cryptographically secure to preserve the machine-id. It's
> probably not too important in itself, but it's a good idea to keep
> it hidden because other hashes might be generated from it.

Which lies in the problem. If people are going to derive hashes from
it they will do so any way the want and most likely it will be leaked
out by someone doing a sum  or just copying it etc. If there is
something 'unique' on a system, it will leak out eventually. All you
can do is try to design to drip out slowly or pour out all at once.
Trying to find some happy middle ground ends up usually with it
pouring out all at once when no one expected it.


> Zbyszek
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 25-20161112.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 3/101 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386)

New failures (same test did not fail in 25-2016.n.0):

ID: 47408   Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso 
desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47408
ID: 47488   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47488

Old failures (same test failed in 25-2016.n.0):

ID: 47513   Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47513
ID: 47518   Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47518

Passed openQA tests: 98/101 (x86_64), 16/17 (i386), 2/2 (arm)

New passes (same test did not pass in 25-2016.n.0):

ID: 47409   Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47409
ID: 47410   Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47410
ID: 47421   Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47421
ID: 47423   Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47423
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: libkpmcore soname bump in rawhide

[Kevin Kofler]

Hi Mattia,

Mattia Verga wrote:
> I've tried to contact you directly to inform of the soname bump, but in
> FAS I found the email ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org which gave me an error of
> nonexistent domain when sending the email...

Huh? That address works fine, I just sent a test mail to it and it arrived.

You can also use calamares-ow...@fedoraproject.org (which, according to the 
policies, should have been CCed on this announcement).

> now I will take note of this your new email address

It's not my "new" e-mail address, it's the actual ISP account to which 
ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org also forwards. But sure, you can send to it directly.

> and I will inform you a week ahead of a new soname bump.

That would be appreciated. Though I don't think it matters much if Calamares 
is broken for a few days in Rawhide. :-)

(By the way, you can write me in Italian if you want, I'm an Italian citizen 
and, even though I was born and live in Austria and was taught German as a 
mother tongue, I speak Italian fluently.)

> There's no problem to give you commit access to kpmcore and
> kde-partitionmanager, if you give me commit access to calamares I can
> chain build it when a new libkpmcore soname bump will happen (if there
> are no other changes required).

Kpmcore usually bumps soname when they make some incompatible API changes 
(that of course also change the ABI), not just ABI, so there are usually 
other changes needed. Calamares has them done already, in its master branch, 
I will update the package to a snapshot in Rawhide. I think a release is 
planned when the kpmcore release happens.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 25 compose report: 20161112.n.0 changes

[Fedora Branched Report]

OLD: Fedora-25-2016.n.0
NEW: Fedora-25-20161112.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =

= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[OmegaT]
OmegaT-2.6.3-2.fc22.armv7hl requires hunspell <= 0:1.4.0
[RackTables]
RackTables-0.20.10-7.fc24.noarch requires php-mysql
[asterisk]
asterisk-dahdi-13.9.1-1.fc25.1.armv7hl requires dahdi-tools >= 0:2.0.0
asterisk-dahdi-13.9.1-1.fc25.1.armv7hl requires libtonezone.so.2.0
[beacon]
beacon-0.5-13.fc24.noarch requires php-mysql
[bionetgen]
bionetgen-2.2.6-3.fc25.armv7hl requires libsundials_cvode.so.1
bionetgen-2.2.6-3.fc25.armv7hl requires libsundials_nvecserial.so.0
[collectd]
collectd-onewire-5.6.0-2.fc25.armv7hl requires libowcapi-3.1.so.0
[golang-github-aws-aws-sdk-go]
golang-github-aws-aws-sdk-go-devel-1.1.3-2.fc25.noarch requires 
golang(golang.org/x/tools/go/types)
[golang-github-gonum-matrix]
golang-github-gonum-matrix-devel-0-0.5.gitfb13962.fc25.noarch requires 
golang(github.com/gonum/lapack/lapack64)
[golang-github-kubernetes-heapster]
golang-github-kubernetes-heapster-devel-0.16.1-4.fc25.noarch requires 
golang(github.com/google/cadvisor/client)
golang-github-kubernetes-heapster-devel-0.16.1-4.fc25.noarch requires 
golang(github.com/google/cadvisor/info/v1)
[golang-github-samalba-dockerclient]
golang-github-samalba-dockerclient-devel-0-0.3.gitc37a52f.fc24.noarch 
requires golang(github.com/docker/docker/pkg/timeutils)
[moksha]
moksha-server-1.0.0-11.fc24.noarch requires orbited
[mrbs]
mrbs-1.4.10-4.fc24.noarch requires php-mysql
[nodejs-co-mocha]
nodejs-co-mocha-1.1.2-1.fc25.noarch requires npm(co) >= 0:4.0.0
[nodejs-cross-spawn]
nodejs-cross-spawn-4.0.0-1.fc25.noarch requires npm(lru-cache) >= 
0:4.0.1
[nodejs-grunt-contrib-csslint]
nodejs-grunt-contrib-csslint-0.4.0-6.fc24.noarch requires 
npm(strip-json-comments) < 0:2
[nodejs-npm-stats]
nodejs-npm-stats-1.1.0-3.fc24.noarch requires npm(JSONStream) < 0:1
[nodejs-rc]
nodejs-rc-1.1.6-2.fc24.noarch requires npm(strip-json-comments) < 0:2
[php-magickwand]
php-magickwand-1.0.9.2-9.fc24.armv7hl requires php(api) = 0:20131106-32
php-magickwand-1.0.9.2-9.fc24.armv7hl requires php(zend-abi) = 
0:20131226-32
[php-pecl-cairo]
php-pecl-cairo-0.3.2-11.fc25.armv7hl requires php(api) = 0:20131106-32
php-pecl-cairo-0.3.2-11.fc25.armv7hl requires php(zend-abi) = 
0:20131226-32
[php-pecl-parsekit]
php-pecl-parsekit-1.3.0-10.fc25.armv7hl requires php(api) = 
0:20131106-32
php-pecl-parsekit-1.3.0-10.fc25.armv7hl requires php(zend-abi) = 
0:20131226-32
[php-pecl-runkit]
php-pecl-runkit-1.0.4-3.fc25.armv7hl requires php(api) = 0:20131106-32
php-pecl-runkit-1.0.4-3.fc25.armv7hl requires php(zend-abi) = 
0:20131226-32
[php-pecl-sphinx]
php-pecl-sphinx-1.3.2-6.fc24.armv7hl requires php(api) = 0:20131106-32
php-pecl-sphinx-1.3.2-6.fc24.armv7hl requires php(zend-abi) = 
0:20131226-32
[poweradmin]
poweradmin-2.1.7-1.fc24.noarch requires php-pear(MDB2_Driver_mysql)
[pyqtrailer]
pyqtrailer-0.6.2-10.fc25.noarch requires pytrailer >= 0:0.6.0
[python-ironicclient]
python3-ironicclient-1.3.1-3.fc25.noarch requires 
python3-openstackclient >= 0:2.1.0
[python-pysaml2]
python3-pysaml2-3.0.2-3.fc25.noarch requires python3-pycrypto >= 0:2.5
[python-zope-i18n]
python2-zope-i18n-4.1.0-4.fc25.noarch requires python2-zope-schema
[qutim]
qutim-0.3.2-5.git.6f3a98a.fc23.armv7hl requires libhunspell-1.3.so.0
[rOCCI-server]
rOCCI-server-1.1.9-1.fc25.noarch requires rubygem(rails) < 0:4.3
rOCCI-server-1.1.9-1.fc25.noarch requires rubygem(responders) < 0:2.2
[redland-bindings]
php-redland-1.0.16.1-16.fc25.armv7hl requires php(api) = 0:20131106-32
php-redland-1.0.16.1-16.fc25.armv7hl requires php(zend-abi) = 
0:20131226-32
[sahana]
sahana-0.6.3-10.fc24.noarch requires php-mysql
[syck]
syck-php-0.70-7.20130402.fc24.armv7hl requires php(api) = 0:20131106-32
syck-php-0.70-7.20130402.fc24.armv7hl requires php(zend-abi) = 
0:20131226-32
[system-config-kickstart]
system-config-kickstart-2.9.3-3.fc24.noarch requires system-config-date
[trytond-calendar]
trytond-calendar-2.6.1-7.fc25.noarch requires tryt

Re: libkpmcore soname bump in rawhide

[Mattia Verga]

Il 12/11/2016 07:41, Kevin Kofler ha scritto:

Mattia Verga wrote:

I will update kpmcore in rawhide to latest development version, so there
will be a soname bump.

Packages affected are kde-partitionmanager (which I will rebuild) and
calamares.

OK, I can update Calamares in Rawhide to master.

Shall we take commit access to each other's packages in the stack (kpmcore,
kde-partitionmanager, calamares) to coordinate this kind of updates? Also so
that we will also be able to push them to stable releases (at least F25,
which will be out by then) when the new versions get officially released? I
can give you commit access to calamares if you want it. (That said, I am
probably the one who knows best what changes, if any, are needed to the
config files from one release to another, so it's probably best if I take
care of the Rawhide package.)

 Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Hi Kevin,
I've tried to contact you directly to inform of the soname bump, but in 
FAS I found the email ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org which gave me an error of 
nonexistent domain when sending the email... now I will take note of 
this your new email address and I will inform you a week ahead of a new 
soname bump.


There's no problem to give you commit access to kpmcore and 
kde-partitionmanager, if you give me commit access to calamares I can 
chain build it when a new libkpmcore soname bump will happen (if there 
are no other changes required).


Thanks
Mattia
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org