Still use fedpkg to build docker images in OSBS?
Hi, What I know so far is that docker images are built in Koji by the container build plugin. I'd like to know if the osbs functionality in fedpkg is still useful for some of you. This could be helpful to determine whether to remove osbs from package tool totally, or just make it a standalone command (separated from container-build command) so that some packagers are still able to use it to build images in OSBS directly. -- Regards, Chenxiong Qi ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: OpenMPI binary only created on 64bit not on 32bit
Am Mon, 28 Nov 2016 21:02:01 -0700
schrieb Orion Poplawski :
> On 11/28/2016 05:29 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
> > On 11/28/2016 04:20 AM, Johannes Lips wrote:
> >>> Am 28.11.2016 09:51, schrieb Johannes Lips:
> >>>
> >>> The pregenerated configure-script looks for libmpi.so in "/usr/lib
> >>> /usr/lib/openmpi /usr/lib64/openmpi/lib", but on i686 it's in
> >>> "/usr/lib/openmpi/lib". Regenerating the configure-script might
> >>> work. Something like "autoreconf --force --install" in %prep after
> >>> %setup. I can not test it at the moment (just windows-machines
> >>> around me at work).
> >> Thanks a lot. I will try to regenerate the configure script, once I
> >> am back home. I also reported it back to upstream, since I am not
> >> sure if that's fedora specific.
> >
> > Usually to compile MPI stuff you just set
> >
> > CC=mpicc
> > CXX=mpic++
> > FC=mpifort
> >
> > since those wrappers handle all the necessary libraries by
> > themselves.
> >
> > Also, note that %{_bindir} is NOT the right place to install OpenMPI
> > binaries - they should go into %{_libdir}/openmpi/bin. They also
> > should have the _openmpi suffix ($MPI_SUFFIX) to distinguish them
> > from the sequential binaries. And the same goes for MPICH vs
> > OpenMPI.
>
> Yes, and see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MPI
>
Seems to be more comlicated,than just the build-error.
Nevertheless, "autoreconf ..." or "autoconf" does not work.
Just for the build-fix:
the newest upstream should have fixed the library-path problem, but the
configure-script does not find mpi.h now.
Here comes the full "%configure-call" (with your sources, not newest
HEAD) that works for me:
%configure --disable-static \
--disable-avx \
%ifarch %{ix86}
--with-mpi-include=/usr/include/openmpi-i386 \
%endif
--with-mpi-lib=%{_libdir}/openmpi/lib
But after reading the two answers above, that might be incorrect or
unneeded. But it looks like the configure-script will fail without the
change regardles of the used compiler.
pgpbn3LkKoLim.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: OpenMPI binary only created on 64bit not on 32bit
On 11/28/2016 05:29 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
On 11/28/2016 04:20 AM, Johannes Lips wrote:
Am 28.11.2016 09:51, schrieb Johannes Lips:
The pregenerated configure-script looks for libmpi.so in "/usr/lib
/usr/lib/openmpi /usr/lib64/openmpi/lib", but on i686 it's in
"/usr/lib/openmpi/lib". Regenerating the configure-script might
work. Something like "autoreconf --force --install" in %prep after
%setup. I can not test it at the moment (just windows-machines
around me at work).
Thanks a lot. I will try to regenerate the configure script, once I
am back home. I also reported it back to upstream, since I am not
sure if that's fedora specific.
Usually to compile MPI stuff you just set
CC=mpicc
CXX=mpic++
FC=mpifort
since those wrappers handle all the necessary libraries by themselves.
Also, note that %{_bindir} is NOT the right place to install OpenMPI
binaries - they should go into %{_libdir}/openmpi/bin. They also should
have the _openmpi suffix ($MPI_SUFFIX) to distinguish them from the
sequential binaries. And the same goes for MPICH vs OpenMPI.
Yes, and see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MPI
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity WG
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity WG on 2016-11-29 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting for the Modularity Working Group. More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki page](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Modularity_Working_Group) The agenda for the meeting is available at [modularity-wg-agendas pad](http://piratepad.nl/modularity-wg-agendas). Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/4697/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: OpenMPI binary only created on 64bit not on 32bit
On 11/28/2016 04:20 AM, Johannes Lips wrote:
Am 28.11.2016 09:51, schrieb Johannes Lips:
The pregenerated configure-script looks for libmpi.so in "/usr/lib
/usr/lib/openmpi /usr/lib64/openmpi/lib", but on i686 it's in
"/usr/lib/openmpi/lib". Regenerating the configure-script might
work. Something like "autoreconf --force --install" in %prep after
%setup. I can not test it at the moment (just windows-machines
around me at work).
Thanks a lot. I will try to regenerate the configure script, once I
am back home. I also reported it back to upstream, since I am not
sure if that's fedora specific.
Usually to compile MPI stuff you just set
CC=mpicc
CXX=mpic++
FC=mpifort
since those wrappers handle all the necessary libraries by themselves.
Also, note that %{_bindir} is NOT the right place to install OpenMPI
binaries - they should go into %{_libdir}/openmpi/bin. They also should
have the _openmpi suffix ($MPI_SUFFIX) to distinguish them from the
sequential binaries. And the same goes for MPICH vs OpenMPI.
--
Susi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Changing the paths on binaries
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 03:52:34PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > I only found one but I have not investigated further: > # dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/sbin/rpcinfo > Local Packages for Fedora 24 30 MB/s | 70 kB 00:00 > nagios-plugins-rpc-0:2.1.1-1.fc24.x86_64 In that case, there's a section on UsrMove in the guidelines which might be relevant here — it suggests putting a virtual provides for the old path: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Effect_of_the_UsrMove_Fedora_Feature -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Nautilus usability
On 11/28/2016 03:22 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 20:23:31 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: An SSD drive might not have this problem, but a spinning disk definitely will. You should never try running multiple copies on the same disk if you want it to finish in a reasonable time. With one copy, you can do long contiguous reads and writes, but if you have multiple copies happening, the read and write head will be bouncing all over the disk. And what does that have to do with the progress window issue? Sorry for taking the thread off-track. I had accidentally deleted the original message and thought there was something about multiple copies taking a long time as well. I agree with you that the progress info window is not so useful and often seems somewhat broken. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: installing RPMs on NFS filesystems
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:04:07PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 08:28:12PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On 23 November 2016 at 19:36, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > On 11/23/2016 07:39 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > >> > > >> Is it supposed to be supported to install RPMs onto NFS filesystems? > > >> Apparently NFSv3 doesn't support capabilities, so I'm not sure what to > > >> do with this bug which happens because cap_net_raw is used for the > > >> fping binaries: > > >> > > > I would expect that isn't supported, although I'm somewhat surprised that > > > it > > > fails instead of just warning. That's a very unusual setup, having the > > > root > > > filesystem on NFS. > > > > I doubt that installing on NFS was supported after we began using > > capabilities on files for security. While installing on NFS was in > > vogue in the 80's and 90's for thin clients and similar environments, > > I think it has fallen to the wayside for current development. [In the > > EPEL environment space I do expect it is still in use for root but > > probably only in EL6 land versus EL7] > > This isn't the first complaint we've gotten, though admittedly it may > have been a while. (And I'm having no luck finding the bugs in > bugzilla.) > > We could add support for capabilities to the NFS protocol, but that > could take a while. > > It'd be nice if rpm installs could fall back on something else instead > of failing, but maybe it's complicated to do that safely. Oh, here's one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648654 --b. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: installing RPMs on NFS filesystems
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 08:28:12PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 23 November 2016 at 19:36, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 11/23/2016 07:39 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > >> > >> Is it supposed to be supported to install RPMs onto NFS filesystems? > >> Apparently NFSv3 doesn't support capabilities, so I'm not sure what to > >> do with this bug which happens because cap_net_raw is used for the > >> fping binaries: > >> > > I would expect that isn't supported, although I'm somewhat surprised that it > > fails instead of just warning. That's a very unusual setup, having the root > > filesystem on NFS. > > I doubt that installing on NFS was supported after we began using > capabilities on files for security. While installing on NFS was in > vogue in the 80's and 90's for thin clients and similar environments, > I think it has fallen to the wayside for current development. [In the > EPEL environment space I do expect it is still in use for root but > probably only in EL6 land versus EL7] This isn't the first complaint we've gotten, though admittedly it may have been a while. (And I'm having no luck finding the bugs in bugzilla.) We could add support for capabilities to the NFS protocol, but that could take a while. It'd be nice if rpm installs could fall back on something else instead of failing, but maybe it's complicated to do that safely. --b. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Stuck PPC64 build
(Two weeks pass...) On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Dan Horák wrote: > and for polymake - it segfaults the same way on s390x > (http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2398862), > likely a big endian issue Thank you Dan, Kevin, Patrick, and Zbigniew. I did not intend to drop out of this email thread, but shortly after I sent this message, the motherboard on my home computer suffered some kind of catastrophic failure. Couldn't even get to the BIOS setup. For me, Black Friday this year was a great day, as it was the day my new computer equipment arrived. After a weekend getting everything set back up, I'm ready to dive back into this issue. Thanks again and regards, -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Changing the paths on binaries
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 11/28/2016 03:41 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Are there any rules regarding changing the > > path of binaries? > > > > rpcbind/rpcinfo has lived in /usr/sbin for > > years but that is because the spec file moves > > the binary from /usr/bin to /usr/sbin during > > the install. Upstream defaults to /usr/bin. > > > > Due to some systemd service file changes > > I would like to just leave rpcbind/rpcinfo > > in /usr/bin which means the path of those > > binaries would change. > > > > It depends on whether you consider that file location to be "API" or not. > Given > that upstream considers them to belong in /usr/bin, I'd guess that probably > there aren't any other packages relying on these executables living in that > location. > I only found one but I have not investigated further: # dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/sbin/rpcinfo Local Packages for Fedora 24 30 MB/s | 70 kB 00:00 nagios-plugins-rpc-0:2.1.1-1.fc24.x86_64 > If there are, you might want to just move them and leave a symlink behind > for > compatibility. > +1 Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Reminder: Fedora 23 End Of Life on 2016-Dec-20
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 08:57:45AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> Fedora 23 support is going to be EOL on Tuesday, December 20th, 2016. >> >> At this day we are going to close all the Fedora 23 bugs which will >> >> remain open [1]. >> > I'd love to see some statistics on number of bugs closed as EOL (vs >> > other resolutions) per release (since we started using the EOL >> > resolution). >> That should be something anyone with bugzilla access can gather > > Yes, and I'll do it if no one else does. :) Sorry, I was intending my comment to point out that it doesn't take anything special to get the stats, so anyone could do it thereby pitching in on an area with clear need. I wasn't trying to tell you to do it yourself in a backhanded way. josh ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Changing the paths on binaries
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 03:57:08PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > It depends on whether you consider that file location to be "API" or > not. Given that upstream considers them to belong in /usr/bin, I'd > guess that probably there aren't any other packages relying on these > executables living in that location. > > If there are, you might want to just move them and leave a symlink > behind for compatibility. And you could release-notes this and eventually drop the symlink. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Review swaps
I've got a couple of new package dependencies that need reviews: prooftree: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399366 ocaml-ocplib-simplex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399367 I've also got a couple more GAP packages waiting in the wings. These 2 are lower priority than the 2 above: gap-pkg-hapcryst: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378526 gap-pkg-xmod: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399365 Let me know what I can review for you in exchange. Regards, -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Changing the paths on binaries
On 11/28/2016 03:41 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > Are there any rules regarding changing the > path of binaries? > > rpcbind/rpcinfo has lived in /usr/sbin for > years but that is because the spec file moves > the binary from /usr/bin to /usr/sbin during > the install. Upstream defaults to /usr/bin. > > Due to some systemd service file changes > I would like to just leave rpcbind/rpcinfo > in /usr/bin which means the path of those > binaries would change. > It depends on whether you consider that file location to be "API" or not. Given that upstream considers them to belong in /usr/bin, I'd guess that probably there aren't any other packages relying on these executables living in that location. If there are, you might want to just move them and leave a symlink behind for compatibility. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Changing the paths on binaries
Hello, Are there any rules regarding changing the path of binaries? rpcbind/rpcinfo has lived in /usr/sbin for years but that is because the spec file moves the binary from /usr/bin to /usr/sbin during the install. Upstream defaults to /usr/bin. Due to some systemd service file changes I would like to just leave rpcbind/rpcinfo in /usr/bin which means the path of those binaries would change. tia, steved. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: State of LuaTeX in F25/rawhide
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Avram Lubkin wrote: > Forcing the pdftex driver gives an error about missing pdf primitives, > so this is most probably related to the removed pdf primitives in LuaTeX > 0.85 and later. > texlive-luatex85 provides luatex85.sty which might solve your issue. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Planned Outage: Cloud Environment - 2016-12-01 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2016-12-01 21:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-12-01 21:00 UTC' Reason for outage: We have been in a freeze for the release of Fedora 25 and have multiple updates across the systems needed to occur. Part of these are to bring RHEL-7 systems to 7.3 and others are to bring some systems to Fedora 25. Affected Services: Cloud Environment - *.fedorainfracloud.org Unaffected Services: Bodhi - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ Buildsystem - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/ Package Database - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/ BFO - https://boot.fedoraproject.org/ GIT / Source Control DNS - ns1.fedoraproject.org, ns2.fedoraproject.org Docs - https://docs.fedoraproject.org/ Email system Fedora Account System - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ Fedora Community - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/community/ Fedora Hosted - https://fedorahosted.org/ Fedora Insight - https://insight.fedoraproject.org/ Fedora People - https://fedorapeople.org/ Main Website - https://fedoraproject.org/ Mirror List - https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/ Mirror Manager - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/ QA Services Secondary Architectures Spins - https://spins.fedoraproject.org/ Start - https://start.fedoraproject.org/ Torrent - https://torrent.fedoraproject.org/ Translation Services - https://translate.fedoraproject.org/ Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ Staging - .stg.fedoraproject.org, .stg.phx2.fedoraproject.org Ticket Link: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/5581 Contact Information: infrastructure @lists.fedoraproject.org Please join #fedora-admin in irc.freenode.net or add comments to the ticket for this outage above. -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Planned Outage: General Services Environment - 2016-11-30 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2016-11-30 21:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-11-30 21:00 UTC' Reason for outage: We have been in a freeze for the release of Fedora 25 and have multiple updates across the systems needed to occur. Part of these are to bring RHEL-7 systems to 7.3 and others are to bring some systems to Fedora 25. Affected Services: Bodhi - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ Buildsystem - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/ Package Database - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/ BFO - https://boot.fedoraproject.org/ GIT / Source Control DNS - ns1.fedoraproject.org, ns2.fedoraproject.org Docs - https://docs.fedoraproject.org/ Email system Fedora Account System - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ Fedora Community - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/community/ Fedora Hosted - https://fedorahosted.org/ Fedora Insight - https://insight.fedoraproject.org/ Fedora People - https://fedorapeople.org/ Main Website - https://fedoraproject.org/ Mirror List - https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/ Mirror Manager - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/ QA Services Secondary Architectures Spins - https://spins.fedoraproject.org/ Start - https://start.fedoraproject.org/ Torrent - https://torrent.fedoraproject.org/ Translation Services - https://translate.fedoraproject.org/ Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ Unaffected Services: Staging - .stg.fedoraproject.org, .stg.phx2.fedoraproject.org Ticket Link: TBA Contact Information: infrastructure @lists.fedoraproject.org Please join #fedora-admin in irc.freenode.net or add comments to the ticket for this outage above. -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Planned Outage: 2016-11-29 21:00 UTC Build Environment
There will be an outage starting at 2016-11-29 21:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-11-29 21:00 UTC' Reason for outage: We have been in a freeze for the release of Fedora 25 and have multiple updates across the systems needed to occur. Part of these are to bring RHEL-7 systems to 7.3 and others are to bring some systems to Fedora 25. Affected Services: Bodhi - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ Buildsystem - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/ Package Database - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/ Unaffected Services: BFO - https://boot.fedoraproject.org/ GIT / Source Control DNS - ns1.fedoraproject.org, ns2.fedoraproject.org Docs - https://docs.fedoraproject.org/ Email system Fedora Account System - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ Fedora Community - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/community/ Fedora Hosted - https://fedorahosted.org/ Fedora Insight - https://insight.fedoraproject.org/ Fedora People - https://fedorapeople.org/ Main Website - https://fedoraproject.org/ Mirror List - https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/ Mirror Manager - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/ QA Services Secondary Architectures Spins - https://spins.fedoraproject.org/ Start - https://start.fedoraproject.org/ Torrent - https://torrent.fedoraproject.org/ Translation Services - https://translate.fedoraproject.org/ Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ Staging - .stg.fedoraproject.org, .stg.phx2.fedoraproject.org Ticket Link: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/5579 Contact Information: infrastructure @lists.fedoraproject.org Please join #fedora-admin in irc.freenode.net or add comments to the ticket for this outage above. -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Planned Outage: Staging Environment - 2016-11-28 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2016-11-28 21:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-11-28 21:00 UTC' Reason for outage: We have been in a freeze for the release of Fedora 25 and have multiple updates across the systems needed to occur. Part of these are to bring RHEL-7 systems to 7.3 and others are to bring some systems to Fedora 25. Affected Services: Staging - .stg.fedoraproject.org, .stg.phx2.fedoraproject.org Unaffected Services: BFO - https://boot.fedoraproject.org/ Bodhi - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ Buildsystem - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/ GIT / Source Control DNS - ns1.fedoraproject.org, ns2.fedoraproject.org Docs - https://docs.fedoraproject.org/ Email system Fedora Account System - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ Fedora Community - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/community/ Fedora Hosted - https://fedorahosted.org/ Fedora Insight - https://insight.fedoraproject.org/ Fedora People - https://fedorapeople.org/ Main Website - https://fedoraproject.org/ Mirror List - https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/ Mirror Manager - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/ Package Database - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/ QA Services Secondary Architectures Spins - https://spins.fedoraproject.org/ Start - https://start.fedoraproject.org/ Torrent - https://torrent.fedoraproject.org/ Translation Services - https://translate.fedoraproject.org/ Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ Ticket Link: TBA Contact Information: infrastructure @lists.fedoraproject.org Please join #fedora-admin in irc.freenode.net or add comments to the ticket for this outage above. -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: upcoming build and release developer flag day December 12 2016
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:10 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On su, 27 marras 2016, Ken Dreyer wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Alexander Bokovoy >> wrote: >>> >>> Heimdal does not support MS-KKDCP spec, so you are left with direct >>> Kerberos communication over port 88/tcp or 88/udp, but these are enabled >>> in Fedora infrastructure, yes. >> >> >> I thought direct Kerberos service was going to be disabled, to prevent >> attackers sniffing and brute-forcing the encrypted preauth timestamp? > > This is really a question to Fedora Infra people but last time we > discussed, RHEL 6-based clients and alike were not getting MS-KKDCP > features backported to older MIT Kerberos versions so to support them, > direct access is required. Correct. The Fedora Infrastructure team needs to balance the risk of MitM offline dictionary attacks with the need for RHEL6 client access. IMHO, there should already be a plan to sunset RHEL6 instances. But I can't judge this based upon Fedora's internal needs. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: upcoming build and release developer flag day December 12 2016
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On ma, 21 marras 2016, Florian Weimer wrote: >> >> On 11/21/2016 01:31 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> >> Thanks for your explanation. >> >>> So yes, we have protection against that. FreeIPA (which is backing this >>> solution) requires preauthentication for all user accounts. >> >> >> “That” meaning offline attacks without intercepted packets. With >> intercepted packets, offline attacks are still feasible, right? > > Right -- if you get initial exchange in the traditional Kerberos 5. > We have been working for several years already to reduce these > possibilities via different means: > - enablement for HTTPS-based tunnel for Kerberos flows based on > MS-KKDCP specification; > > - DNS-based announcement of Kerberos MS-KKDCP proxy using DNS URI; > > - SPAKE exchange support in MIT Kerberos (slated for 1.15-1.16) > > Fedora infrastructure uses MS-KKDCP proxy with Fedora certificate to > tunnel Kerberos 5 traffic. If you have recent Fedora, you'll get it used > automatically with the help of DNS URI. For older clients which don't > support DNS-based discovery you can configure MS-KKDCP proxy access > manually by stating 'kdc=https://id.fedoraproject.org/KdcProxy' for > FEDORAPROJECT.ORG realm. For very old clients that don't support > MS-KKDCP (RHEL 6, for example), you are back to use naked Kerberos 5 > traffic. > > Our effort is to get to SPAKE sooner than later. I'll be working with Robbie Harwood to implement SPAKE in the coming months. So let me add some clarification here. 1. Like Stephen said, preauth now prevents offline dictionary attack without interception. This has been true for years. 2. Offline dictionary attack is theoretically possible with MitM (though is somewhat mitigated by the added timestamp entropy). This can be further mitigated by using the HTTPS proxy as stated by Alexander. I am not aware of any successful attacks using this method. 3. SPAKE is a new technique to make this whole problem irrelevant (as well as provide an implicitly trusted tunnel for 2FA without additional trust anchors). The draft is available here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mccallum-kitten-krb-spake-preauth-00. A new draft is forthcoming shortly. SPAKE works like a normal Password-Authenticated Key Exchange, and thus is entirely protected from offline attacks the same way Diffie-Hellman is. There is already a 1FA implementation in an upstream branch which we are going to expand to support 2FA and then merge. The server-side will only land in newer Fedoras. However, should need arise, we might be able to backport the client-side as a plugin. I'm hoping to land this in F26. Nathaniel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: License of perl-Test-Prereq changed from (GPL+ or Artistic) to Artistic 2.0
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 04:19:19PM +, Paul Howarth wrote: > The license of perl-Test-Prereq changed from (GPL+ or Artistic) to > Artistic 2.0. Note that FSF considers Artistic 2.0 to be GPL-compatible. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#ArtisticLicense2 -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
License of perl-Test-Prereq changed from (GPL+ or Artistic) to Artistic 2.0
The license of perl-Test-Prereq changed from (GPL+ or Artistic) to Artistic 2.0. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Reminder: Fedora 23 End Of Life on 2016-Dec-20
Also I have historical data - http://borntobeopen.blogspot.cz/2014/02/end-of-not-my-life.html till Fedora 20 (not in this blog post, I can share it) before EOL resolution was established as I was running the script. Jaroslav On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 08:57:45AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> Fedora 23 support is going to be EOL on Tuesday, December 20th, 2016. >> >> At this day we are going to close all the Fedora 23 bugs which will >> >> remain open [1]. >> > I'd love to see some statistics on number of bugs closed as EOL (vs >> > other resolutions) per release (since we started using the EOL >> > resolution). >> That should be something anyone with bugzilla access can gather > > Yes, and I'll do it if no one else does. :) > > -- > Matthew Miller > > Fedora Project Leader > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Jaroslav Řezník Engineering Program Manager Office: +420 532 294 645 Mobile: +420 602 797 774 Red Hat, Inc. http://www.redhat.com/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Trying not call elfutils functions in ABRT under root
On 28.11.2016 09:47, xmine...@seznam.cz wrote: > Hello, > > im using elfutils in ABRT program specifically when generating > core_backtrace. According to this https://github.com/abrt/abrt/issues/890 > post, it is not a good idea using elfutils under root. So I have tried moving > as much elfutils function calls to non-root process as possible. That means > the parent process is forked and in child process there are opened necessary > files: > > https://github.com/xsulca00/abrt/blob/iss%23890/src/hooks/abrt-hook-ccpp.c#L1321 > https://github.com/xsulca00/satyr/blob/iss%23890/lib/core_unwind_elfutils.c#L242 > > and then UID and GID of child is changed and then I can call elfutils: > > https://github.com/xsulca00/abrt/blob/iss%23890/src/hooks/abrt-hook-ccpp.c#L1361 > https://github.com/xsulca00/satyr/blob/iss%23890/lib/core_unwind_elfutils.c#L392 > > Is there any way how I can pass the opened files to elfutils functions? > Especially for "/etc/[tid]/mem" which is needed in dwfl_linux_proc_find_elf > that is part of Dwfl_Callbacks proc_cb ? I think that this should work: (while being root) 1. open file descriptor 2. call seteuid() 3. pass the file descriptor to the new process I'm not saying that you need to do exactly this in case of elfutils but it should work in the general case. -- Petr Spacek @ Red Hat ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Rawhide-20161128.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 9/79 (x86_64), 3/15 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161127.n.0): ID: 50051 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/50051 Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20161127.n.0): ID: 50049 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/50049 ID: 50050 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/50050 ID: 50052 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/50052 ID: 50065 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/50065 ID: 50078 Test: x86_64 universal install_anaconda_text URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/50078 ID: 50113 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/50113 ID: 50116 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/50116 ID: 50118 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/50118 ID: 50121 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/50121 ID: 50130 Test: x86_64 universal install_rescue_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/50130 ID: 50139 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/50139 ID: 50140 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/50140 Passed openQA tests: 67/79 (x86_64), 12/15 (i386) New passes (same test did not pass in Rawhide-20161127.n.0): ID: 50092 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/50092 ID: 50096 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/50096 Skipped openQA tests: 1 of 96 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Reminder: Fedora 23 End Of Life on 2016-Dec-20
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 08:57:45AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> Fedora 23 support is going to be EOL on Tuesday, December 20th, 2016. > >> At this day we are going to close all the Fedora 23 bugs which will > >> remain open [1]. > > I'd love to see some statistics on number of bugs closed as EOL (vs > > other resolutions) per release (since we started using the EOL > > resolution). > That should be something anyone with bugzilla access can gather Yes, and I'll do it if no one else does. :) -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Reviews Weekly
Start Date: 2016-11-21 10:08:02.016221 End Date: 2016-11-28 10:08:02.016221 Rex Dieter : 6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360255 qt5-qtcharts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397778 qt5-qtgamepad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360284 qt5-qtdeclarative-render2d https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397784 qt5-qtwebview https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397800 qt5-qtdatavis3d https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382681 qt5-qtscxml Shawn Iwinski : 6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358165 php-zendframework-zend-xml2json https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358155 php-zendframework-zend-mvc-i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393934 php-http-interop-http-middleware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358153 php-zendframework-zend-mvc-form https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358164 php-zendframework-zend-mvc-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358149 php-zendframework-zend-json-server gil cattaneo : 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398340 python-trezor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397051 caffeine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374899 quassel-irssi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396636 golang-github-knieriem-markdown Ben Rosser : 3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396216 aalto-xml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395726 apache-commons-configuration2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793 hyperrogue Igor Gnatenko : 3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396232 libkeepalive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397317 graphene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398929 brightnessctl Jitka Plesnikova : 3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394242 perl-Net-DAVTalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394252 perl-Net-CalDAVTalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394262 perl-Net-CardDAVTalk Tim Orling : 3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396273 python3-netifaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384130 python3-sqlalchemy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384249 python3-ply Antonio Trande : 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397140 mrrescue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391334 freeorion Athos Ribeiro : 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395554 python-astral https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395396 python-sphinx-gallery François Kooman : 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391951 php-cs-fixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398355 php-ast Iryna Shcherbina : 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395804 python-batinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383416 python-influxdb Jakub Hrozek : 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394788 lua-mpack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394785 lua-bitop Martin Bříza : 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370792 python-premailer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370735 python-sampledata Daiki Ueno : 1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397030 mingw-libidn2 Fabio Alessandro Locati : 1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373641 setBfree Jakub Jelen : 1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394275 librdkafka Johan Cwiklinski : 1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398799 php-phpiredis Jonny Heggheim : 1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325672 jmxutils Julien Enselme : 1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1365839 python-django-notifications-hq MartinKG : 1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379798 pcsxr Neal Gompa : 1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395955 fatresize Nick Bebout : 1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391487 nextcloud-client Raphael Groner : 1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309909 python3-tornado Stephen Gallagher : 1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394952 python-avocado Tomas Orsava : 1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398432 playitagainsam Tomas Repik : 1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290342 ecc-25519-java Yaakov Selkowitz : 1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.
[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates
Change in package status over the last 168 hours 5 packages were orphaned kompose [el5] was orphaned by orion Tool to move from `docker-compose` to Kubernetes https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/kompose libdnf [f23] was orphaned by ignatenkobrain Library providing simplified C and Python API to libsolv https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/libdnf python-dingus [f23, master, f25, f24] was orphaned by cstratak A record-then-assert mocking library https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-dingus python-django-sorting [f23, master, f25, f24] was orphaned by cstratak A Django application for easy sorting https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-django-sorting python-keyring [el5] was orphaned by ctubbsii Store and access your passwords safely https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-keyring 5 packages were retired fourterm [master] was retired by lzap Lightweight split-screen terminal emulator with vim key mappings https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/fourterm konkretcmpi [master] was retired by rnovacek Tool for rapid CMPI providers development https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/konkretcmpi mono [el5] was retired by tpokorra Cross-platform, Open Source, .NET development framework https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/mono perl-SOAP-Lite [el6] was retired by eseyman Client and server side SOAP implementation https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-SOAP-Lite python-sphinx_gallery [master] was retired by orion Sphinx extension to automatically generate an examples gallery https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-sphinx_gallery 3 packages unorphaned - exonerate [master] was unorphaned by marcusk A generic tool for sequence alignment https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/exonerate rubygem-heroku [f23, master, f25, f24] was unorphaned by marcusk Client library and CLI to deploy apps on Heroku https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rubygem-heroku rubygem-heroku-api [f23, master, f25, f24] was unorphaned by marcusk Ruby Client for the Heroku API https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rubygem-heroku-api 0 packages were unretired 11 packages were given - gphoto2 [f23, master, f25, f24] was given by twaugh to ignatenkobrain Software for accessing digital cameras https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/gphoto2 http-parser [el6, epel7] was given by sgallagh to ignatenkobrain HTTP request/response parser for C https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/http-parser k3b [f23, master, f25, f24] was given by rnovacek to group::kde-sig CD/DVD/Blu-ray burning application https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/k3b kdevplatform [f23, master, f25, f24] was given by rnovacek to group::kde-sig Libraries for use by KDE development tools https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/kdevplatform krazy2 [f23, master, f25, f24] was given by rnovacek to group::kde-sig Krazy is a tool for checking code against the KDE coding guidelines https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/krazy2 libgphoto2 [f23, master, f25, f24] was given by twaugh to ignatenkobrain Library for accessing digital cameras https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/libgphoto2 python-enchant [f23, master, f25, f24] was given by rnovacek to cstratak Python bindings for Enchant spellchecking library https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-enchant python-keyring [f23, master, f25, f24] was given by rtnpro to ctubbsii Store and access your passwords safely https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-keyring python-pynlpl [master, f25] was given by limb to ishcherb A Python library for Natural Language Processing https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-pynlpl quassel-irssi [master, epel7, f24] was given by limb to tc01 An irssi plugin to connect to quassel core https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/quassel-irssi tweepy [f23, master, f25, f24] was given by rtnpro to echevemaster An easy-to-use Python library for accessing the Twitter API https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/tweepy 2 packages had new branches python-pynlpl had a new branch: f24 for ishcherb by limb A Python library for Natural Language Processing https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-pynlpl quassel-irssi had a new branch: f25 for tc01 by limb An irssi plugin to connect to quassel core https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/quassel-irssi Sources: https://github.com/pypingou/fedora-owner-change ___ d
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20161128.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20161127.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20161128.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 25 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 417.55 MiB Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B Size change of upgraded packages: -39.62 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: bugzilla-5.0.3-3.fc26 Old package: bugzilla-5.0.3-2.fc25 Summary: Bug tracking system RPMs: bugzilla bugzilla-contrib bugzilla-doc bugzilla-doc-build Size: 3219956 bytes Size change: -416 bytes Changelog: * Sun Nov 27 2016 Emmanuel Seyman - 5.0.3-3 - Check for perl(JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::CGI) instead of perl(JSON::RPC) Package: devscripts-2.16.10-1.fc26 Old package: devscripts-2.16.9-1.fc26 Summary: Scripts for Debian Package maintainers RPMs: devscripts devscripts-checkbashisms devscripts-compat Size: 3237608 bytes Size change: 4252 bytes Package: docker-2:1.12.3-24.git7b5044b.fc26 Old package: docker-2:1.12.3-22.git7b5044b.fc26 Summary: Automates deployment of containerized applications RPMs: container-selinux docker docker-common docker-devel docker-fish-completion docker-logrotate docker-lvm-plugin docker-novolume-plugin docker-rhel-push-plugin docker-rhsubscription docker-unit-test docker-v1.10-migrator docker-vim docker-zsh-completion Size: 313956540 bytes Size change: 58688 bytes Changelog: * Sun Nov 27 2016 Antonio Murdaca - 2:1.12.3-23.git7b5044b - built docker @projectatomic/docker-1.12 commit 7b5044b - built docker-selinux commit 51001dd - built d-s-s commit c9faba1 - built docker-novolume-plugin commit c521254 - built docker-runc @projectatomic/runc-1.12 commit b8dbc3b - built docker-utils commit - built docker-containerd commit 9f45393 - built docker-v1.10-migrator commit 994c35c * Sun Nov 27 2016 Antonio Murdaca - 2:1.12.3-24.git7b5044b - built docker @projectatomic/docker-1.12 commit 7b5044b - built docker-selinux commit 9de0085 - built d-s-s commit c9faba1 - built docker-novolume-plugin commit c521254 - built docker-runc @projectatomic/runc-1.12 commit b8dbc3b - built docker-utils commit - built docker-containerd commit 9f45393 - built docker-v1.10-migrator commit 994c35c Package: dpkg-1.18.15-1.fc26 Old package: dpkg-1.17.27-1.fc26 Summary: Package maintenance system for Debian Linux RPMs: dpkg dpkg-dev dpkg-devel dpkg-perl dselect Size: 12290320 bytes Size change: -567328 bytes Changelog: * Sat Nov 26 2016 S??rgio Basto - 1.18.15-1 - New major release, 1.18.15, adaptations based on files of debian directory in debian package. Package: ejabberd-16.09-3.fc26 Old package: ejabberd-16.09-2.fc26 Summary: A distributed, fault-tolerant Jabber/XMPP server RPMs: ejabberd Size: 23716290 bytes Size change: 1836 bytes Changelog: * Sun Nov 27 2016 Randy Barlow - 16.09-3 - Use -set-cookie in ejabberdctl so root can attach to the node (#1163812). - Mark ejabberdctl as executable. - Dropped unnecessary gcc-g++ BuildRequires. Package: ethtool-2:4.8-1.fc26 Old package: ethtool-2:4.2-2.fc24 Summary: Settings tool for Ethernet NICs RPMs: ethtool Size: 798940 bytes Size change: 44652 bytes Changelog: * Mon Nov 28 2016 Robert Scheck - 2:4.8-1 - Update to 4.8 (#1317497) Package: gnote-3.22.1-1.fc26 Old package: gnote-3.21.1-1.fc26 Summary: Note-taking application RPMs: gnote Size: 23128524 bytes Size change: -162120 bytes Changelog: * Mon Sep 26 2016 Kalev Lember - 3.22.0-1 - Update to 3.22.0 * Sun Nov 27 2016 Kalev Lember - 3.22.1-1 - Update to 3.22.1 Package: gnu-smalltalk-3.2.5-12.fc26 Old package: gnu-smalltalk-3.2.5-11.fc26 Summary: GNU Smalltalk RPMs: gnu-smalltalk gnu-smalltalk-devel Size: 12630552 bytes Size change: 60 bytes Changelog: * Sun Nov 27 2016 Marcus Karlsson - 3.2.5-12 - Build with --disable-relocatable Package: icaro-1.0.7-1.fc26 Old package: icaro-1.0.6-1.fc26 Summary: Robotic Educational Project RPMs: icaro Size: 336974 bytes Size change: 5852 bytes Changelog: * Sat Nov 12 2016 Omar Berroteran - 1.0.7 - Bump to the new upstream version Package: kexec-tools-2.0.13-9.fc26 Old package: kexec-tools-2.0.13-8.fc26 Summary: The kexec/kdump userspace component RPMs: kexec-tools kexec-tools-anaconda-addon Size: 2613420 bytes Size change: -964 bytes Changelog: * Mon Nov 28 2016 Dave Young - 2.0.13-9 - rename function kdump_to_udev_name - Raw dump: use by-id as persistent policy in 2nd kernel
Re: Nautilus usability
Michael Schwendt píše v Ne 27. 11. 2016 v 00:53 +0100: > This is about F25 and F24, but likely applies to older releases, too, > since I haven't noticed any improvements about it. > > Have you ever made Nautilus copy/move a huge directory tree and then > started a similar task for other directories while Nautilus was still > working on the first task? > > What happens here is that there is this small progress icon, and if > you > click on it, a tiny window pops up showing the progress of each > Nautilus > task. It's tiny window that cannot be made larger. Try to scroll > down, but > Nautilus interferes and jumps to the top again frequently. Have you > ever... No, probably not the developers of Nautilus. That should > answer > the question raised above. > > And how to remove completed tasks or empty that window? Impossible > while > Nautilus is busy working on tasks. There only is a 'X' button to > cancel > running tasks and a non-clickable icon for completed and cancelled > tasks. Not helpful. Worse, cancelled tasks remain in the list, too. > > What am I missing? I'm missing a link to a bug report here. JE signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Reminder: Fedora 23 End Of Life on 2016-Dec-20
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Matthew Miller > wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:25:50AM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: >>> Fedora 23 support is going to be EOL on Tuesday, December 20th, 2016. >>> At this day we are going to close all the Fedora 23 bugs which will >>> remain open [1]. >> >> I'd love to see some statistics on number of bugs closed as EOL (vs >> other resolutions) per release (since we started using the EOL >> resolution). > > That should be something anyone with bugzilla access can gather I am going to publish these statistics as a blogpost on the Community Blog, once F23 is EOL. Regards, Jan > josh > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Jan Kuřík Platform & Fedora Program Manager Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Reminder: Fedora 23 End Of Life on 2016-Dec-20
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:25:50AM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: >> Fedora 23 support is going to be EOL on Tuesday, December 20th, 2016. >> At this day we are going to close all the Fedora 23 bugs which will >> remain open [1]. > > I'd love to see some statistics on number of bugs closed as EOL (vs > other resolutions) per release (since we started using the EOL > resolution). That should be something anyone with bugzilla access can gather josh ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Reminder: Fedora 23 End Of Life on 2016-Dec-20
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:25:50AM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: > Fedora 23 support is going to be EOL on Tuesday, December 20th, 2016. > At this day we are going to close all the Fedora 23 bugs which will > remain open [1]. I'd love to see some statistics on number of bugs closed as EOL (vs other resolutions) per release (since we started using the EOL resolution). -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
State of LuaTeX in F25/rawhide
Hi there,
I have some strange doc-build failures in F25 and rawhide. The
pertaining TeX-files work nicely with both pdfTeX and LuaTeX in F24 as
well as with pdfTeX in F25. Upstream builds the doc with LuaTeX.
Is LuaTeX in F25 known in to be in a working state?
More specifically, I'm trying to build pdf output, the doc uses hyperref
(and other packages) with the pdftex driver loaded automatically on F24
and hluatex driver loaded automatically on F25 - lualatex aborts at
\begin{document}:
Package hyperref Message: Driver (autodetected): hluatex.
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/hyperref/hluatex.def
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/oberdiek/rerunfilecheck.sty)))
(./config.tex)
Writing index file bibtool.idx
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/listings/listings.sty
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/listings/lstmisc.sty)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/listings/listings.cfg))
(./bibtool.aux
)
! Missing number, treated as zero.
p
l.160 \begin{document}
%%%...
Forcing the pdftex driver gives an error about missing pdf primitives,
so this is most probably related to the removed pdf primitives in LuaTeX
0.85 and later.
Michael
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: OpenMPI binary only created on 64bit not on 32bit
> Am 28.11.2016 09:51, schrieb Johannes Lips: > > The pregenerated configure-script looks for libmpi.so in "/usr/lib > /usr/lib/openmpi /usr/lib64/openmpi/lib", but on i686 it's in > "/usr/lib/openmpi/lib". > Regenerating the configure-script might work. > Something like "autoreconf --force --install" in %prep after %setup. > I can not test it at the moment (just windows-machines around me at > work). Thanks a lot. I will try to regenerate the configure script, once I am back home. I also reported it back to upstream, since I am not sure if that's fedora specific. Johannes > > Jens ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Nautilus usability
On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 20:23:31 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > An SSD drive might not have this problem, but a spinning disk definitely > will. You should never try running multiple copies on the same disk if > you want it to finish in a reasonable time. With one copy, you can do > long contiguous reads and writes, but if you have multiple copies > happening, the read and write head will be bouncing all over the disk. And what does that have to do with the progress window issue? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Nautilus usability
On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 20:58:45 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Chris Murphy > > wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Michael Schwendt > >> wrote: > >>> On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 15:07:20 +, Chris Murphy wrote: > >>> > A directory containing 10,000 1MiB files moved to another directory > completes immediately. > >>> > >>> The target directory may be a different partition or a network mount. > >> > >> In that case it's a copy followed by deletion of the original. > > > > And in that case, it's not "completed immediately", is it? > > Nope, and in that case it's not completely a move either, is it? And your point is what? "Move" is just another term for cut'n'paste. Any file operation that takes some time is enough to reproduce the problem in Nautilus. Add a couple of tasks that are completed quickly, and they add to cluttering up the progress window further. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Nautilus usability
On 11/28/2016 07:53 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 11/27/2016 10:40 PM, drago01 wrote: >> On Monday, November 28, 2016, Py mailto:p...@luyten.fr>> >> wrote: >> >An SSD drive might not have this problem, but a spinning disk >> >definitely >> >will. You should never try running multiple copies on the same disk if >> > >> >you want it to finish in a reasonable time. With one copy, you can do >> >long contiguous reads and writes, but if you have multiple copies >> >happening, the read and write head will be bouncing all over the disk. >> >> So ideally this is the file manager job to queue copy operations. >> This allows to do right even when the user is wrong, or wants to >> launch big copy before coffee. >> >> >> No. The kernel (io scheduler) is supposed to order requests to avoid >> this scenario. Also sequential reads / writes only happen for large >> files if there is no fragmentation. >> > How could the kernel ever schedule this nicely? Is it going to hold up > one process until the other one is finished? one thing the kernel knows reasonably well but user-space has to work out with some effort is which of the multiple copy operations the user has started are actually working on completely independent storage devices, in which case there is no penalty to doing them in parallel. is there an implementation of an heuristic to determine that from user-space? i'm quite sure it's more complicated than it appears at first glance, what with DM, MD, eCryptFS, FUSE, iSCSI, NFS etc. complicating things, not to mention you could be running in a VM where you have no idea where your "sda" and "sdb" actually are. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Reminder: Fedora 23 End Of Life on 2016-Dec-20
Fedora 23 support is going to be EOL on Tuesday, December 20th, 2016. At this day we are going to close all the Fedora 23 bugs which will remain open [1]. You have last few weeks to submit your updates to the Fedora 23, if you have any, before the Fedora 23 release becomes unsupported. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora25#Fedora_23_EOL_Closure Regards, Jan -- Jan Kuřík Platform & Fedora Program Manager Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: OpenMPI binary only created on 64bit not on 32bit
Am 28.11.2016 09:51, schrieb Johannes Lips: Hi all, I've been trying to build gretl with mpi support and I followed the guidelines in the wiki [1]. It apparently works, since I was able to build it on 64bit, which worked every time, but the 32bit build always fails to find the openmpi libraries, as can be seen from the build.log from the build in [2]. I would like to know if someone could check the spec file, if it's correct and tell me what's the issue with openmpi and why it can't be found on 32bit. The spec file I've been using can be found on my github.[3] Thanks, johannes [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MPI [2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16646986 [3] https://github.com/hannes101/gretl/blob/master/gretl.spec The pregenerated configure-script looks for libmpi.so in "/usr/lib /usr/lib/openmpi /usr/lib64/openmpi/lib", but on i686 it's in "/usr/lib/openmpi/lib". Regenerating the configure-script might work. Something like "autoreconf --force --install" in %prep after %setup. I can not test it at the moment (just windows-machines around me at work). Jens ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
ABI changes analysis for the Linux kernel
Hello, This is a tracker of ABI changes in the new upstream releases of the Linux kernel (defconfig, x86_64): https://abi-laboratory.pro/tracker/timeline/linux/ The tracker performs backward binary compatibility analysis of all public exported symbols and data types (declared in the ".ksymtab" and ".ksymtab_gpl" sections of the vmlinux binary + system calls) and lists all added/removed symbols. The source code of the tool is published on github: https://github.com/lvc/kernel-abi-tracker The tool can be used to analyze downstream kernels as well. See README of the project. It's better to use ABICC 2.0 Beta or newer to improve performance of the analysis. Enjoy! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
OpenMPI binary only created on 64bit not on 32bit
Hi all, I've been trying to build gretl with mpi support and I followed the guidelines in the wiki [1]. It apparently works, since I was able to build it on 64bit, which worked every time, but the 32bit build always fails to find the openmpi libraries, as can be seen from the build.log from the build in [2]. I would like to know if someone could check the spec file, if it's correct and tell me what's the issue with openmpi and why it can't be found on 32bit. The spec file I've been using can be found on my github.[3] Thanks, johannes [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MPI [2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16646986 [3] https://github.com/hannes101/gretl/blob/master/gretl.spec ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Trying not call elfutils functions in ABRT under root
Hello, im using elfutils in ABRT program specifically when generating core_backtrace. According to this https://github.com/abrt/abrt/issues/890 post, it is not a good idea using elfutils under root. So I have tried moving as much elfutils function calls to non-root process as possible. That means the parent process is forked and in child process there are opened necessary files: https://github.com/xsulca00/abrt/blob/iss%23890/src/hooks/abrt-hook-ccpp.c#L1321 https://github.com/xsulca00/satyr/blob/iss%23890/lib/core_unwind_elfutils.c#L242 and then UID and GID of child is changed and then I can call elfutils: https://github.com/xsulca00/abrt/blob/iss%23890/src/hooks/abrt-hook-ccpp.c#L1361 https://github.com/xsulca00/satyr/blob/iss%23890/lib/core_unwind_elfutils.c#L392 Is there any way how I can pass the opened files to elfutils functions? Especially for "/etc/[tid]/mem" which is needed in dwfl_linux_proc_find_elf that is part of Dwfl_Callbacks proc_cb ? Thank you ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Java/OpenJDK enforces the system-wide crypto policy
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 12:07 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: >> On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 18:13 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: >> > >> > As it is now, the System-wide crypto policy in F25 is enforced by >> > the >> > OpenSSL, GnuTLS and NSS TLS libraries. To harmonize crypto across >> > all >> > applications in Fedora, including the Java ones, OpenJDK is >> > enhanced >> > to respect the settings of the system-wide crypto policy as well. >> >> This is no longer true. I just got a questionable F24 stable release >> update that implemented this change, so I presume F25 will have it >> soon >> enough. We probably don't want an F26 change proposal for a feature >> that's implemented in a zero-day F25 update. > > That wasn't the plan, but it could have been a mistake. Could you add > more info at: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249083 Hi, as required by the Change process, after a week since the proposal was announced, I have put this on the FESCo meeting agenda for the upcoming Friday. However, reading the discussion in this email thread and in the tracking bug [2] I am puzzled what the current state is. Is it already delivered, or is it delivered but disabled, or is it in any other state ? May I ask the maintainer, or any engineer who is working on this to clarify the current state of implementation before the FESCo meeting, so the FESCo has clear information they can use to make a decision ? [1] https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1635#comment-43494 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249083 Thanks and Best Regards, Jan __ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Jan Kuřík Platform & Fedora Program Manager Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: upcoming build and release developer flag day December 12 2016
On su, 27 marras 2016, Ken Dreyer wrote: On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: Heimdal does not support MS-KKDCP spec, so you are left with direct Kerberos communication over port 88/tcp or 88/udp, but these are enabled in Fedora infrastructure, yes. I thought direct Kerberos service was going to be disabled, to prevent attackers sniffing and brute-forcing the encrypted preauth timestamp? This is really a question to Fedora Infra people but last time we discussed, RHEL 6-based clients and alike were not getting MS-KKDCP features backported to older MIT Kerberos versions so to support them, direct access is required. -- / Alexander Bokovoy ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
