package blocked for tag f27-updates-candidate

[Alexander Ploumistos]

Hi,

I've been trying to build a new version of a package (scidavis) and it
fails on f27 every time with the message "FAILED: BuildError: package
scidavis is blocked for tag f27-updates-candidate".
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22657927

Is this because of the Final freeze, or is there some other problem? I
thought that packages without freeze exceptions were supposed to get
stuck in bodhi, not koji.

I took a look and plenty of other packages which don't seem to be
critical path build fine for the same tag.

Best regards
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Mass rebuilds update

[Ben Rosser]

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez
 wrote:
> They are not tagged for fedora 27.
>
> # hostnamectl  | egrep "Operating|CPE"
>   Operating System: Fedora 27 (Workstation Edition)
>CPE OS Name: cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:27
>
> # dnf install quasselc quassel-irssi
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:44 ago on Tue 24 Oct 2017 02:35:19 AM 
> CEST.
> Dependencies resolved.
> ===
>  Package   Arch   
> Version 
> Repository  Size
> ===
> Installing:
>  quassel-irssi x86_64 
> 0-4.20170119git7b034e3.fc26 fedora
>   38 k
> Installing dependencies:
>  irssi x86_64 
> 1.0.4-3.fc27fedora
>  758 k
>  quasselc  x86_64 
> 0-3.20170111gita0a1e6b.fc26 fedora
>   23 k
>
> Transaction Summary
> ===
> Install  3 Packages
>
> Total download size: 819 k
> Installed size: 2.4 M
> Is this ok [y/N]:

Well, that's... interesting. It's not clear to me why; as far as I
knew, they both passed the mass rebuild. Or, rather, the binutils mass
rebuild: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild.
I haven't touched the packages since then.

I'd be interested to know if this has happened to any of the other
packages on the list...

Ben Rosser
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Autumn Elections 2017: Collection of questions for Questionnaire has been started

[Jan Kurik]

For this Election cycle [1] we are going to follow a new way how
Elections are organized. It is an outcome of a discussion on Council
level [2] trying to improve participation of the Fedora Community in
the election process.

Today we are starting collection of questions for Election
Questionnaire [3]. The collection period ends one week after the F27
Final GA date, which means there is a time at least to November 6th to
collect these questions.

For the beginning I have copied the questions from previous Election
cycle. Feel free to add more questions or modify the current questions
of the Questionnaire [3].

The full schedule of the Autumn Elections 2017 is available on the
Elections wiki page [4] and on the detailed schedule for F27 [5].

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections
[2] https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/135#comment-467523
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections/Questionnaire
[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections
[5] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-27/f-27-elections.html

Regards,
Jan
-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Autumn Elections 2017: Collection of questions for Questionnaire has been started

[Jan Kurik]

For this Election cycle [1] we are going to follow a new way how
Elections are organized. It is an outcome of a discussion on Council
level [2] trying to improve participation of the Fedora Community in
the election process.

Today we are starting collection of questions for Election
Questionnaire [3]. The collection period ends one week after the F27
Final GA date, which means there is a time at least to November 6th to
collect these questions.

For the beginning I have copied the questions from previous Election
cycle. Feel free to add more questions or modify the current questions
of the Questionnaire [3].

The full schedule of the Autumn Elections 2017 is available on the
Elections wiki page [4] and on the detailed schedule for F27 [5].

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections
[2] https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/135#comment-467523
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections/Questionnaire
[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections
[5] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-27/f-27-elections.html

Regards,
Jan
-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Mass rebuilds update

[Xose Vazquez Perez]

Ben Rosser wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Xose Vazquez Perez  
> wrote:
>> quasselc-0-3.20170111gita0a1e6b | fc26
>> quassel-irssi-0-4.20170119git7b034e3 | fc26

> Where is this list sourced from? 

I did get it directly from koji:
koji latest-pkg --all f27

> I maintain both of these packages,
> and to my knowledge, they're building fine. (And no FTBFS bugs have
> been filed against them).
> 
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=23320
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=23342
> 
> This makes me slightly dubious about the rest of the list.

They are not tagged for fedora 27.

# hostnamectl  | egrep "Operating|CPE"
  Operating System: Fedora 27 (Workstation Edition)
   CPE OS Name: cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:27

# dnf install quasselc quassel-irssi
Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:44 ago on Tue 24 Oct 2017 02:35:19 AM CEST.
Dependencies resolved.
===
 Package   Arch 
  Version Repository
  Size
===
Installing:
 quassel-irssi x86_64   
  0-4.20170119git7b034e3.fc26 fedora
  38 k
Installing dependencies:
 irssi x86_64   
  1.0.4-3.fc27fedora
 758 k
 quasselc  x86_64   
  0-3.20170111gita0a1e6b.fc26 fedora
  23 k

Transaction Summary
===
Install  3 Packages

Total download size: 819 k
Installed size: 2.4 M
Is this ok [y/N]:
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] updating superlu to 5.x (soname update)

[Mukundan Ragavan]

We would like to update SuperLU to version 5.x in EPEL 7. This would
introduce a soname change for libsuperlu. The packages that depend on
SuperLU are armadillo and hypre.

I have created a COPR [1] where we have built all three packages. They
seem to build fine. If they are issues that others expect due to the
soname bump, please let me know.

Assuming no issues, we are looking to build in the next couple of days.
I will rebuild all the dependent packages.

Thanks,
Mukundan.


[1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nonamedotc/superlu_5_epel/




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Mass rebuilds update

[Ben Rosser]

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Xose Vazquez Perez
 wrote:
> On 10/22/2017 04:08 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>> Mat Booth wrote:
>>
>>> On 7 August 2017 at 15:35, Dennis Gilmore  wrote:
>>>
 [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.html

>>>
>>> This file seems suspiciously small... I somehow don't believe that there
>>> were "0 failed builds" :-)
>> Current status?
>
> Digging a bit deeper, there are ~880 packages with building problems.
> Some of them since fedora 20/21:
>

> quasselc-0-3.20170111gita0a1e6b | fc26
> quassel-irssi-0-4.20170119git7b034e3 | fc26

Where is this list sourced from? I maintain both of these packages,
and to my knowledge, they're building fine. (And no FTBFS bugs have
been filed against them).

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=23320
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=23342

This makes me slightly dubious about the rest of the list.

Ben Rosser
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505126] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171020 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505126



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171020-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-7d34256339

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505087] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.40 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505087



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.40-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-4f180d1b5f

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Mass rebuilds update

[Michael Cullen]

I have a PR up for edb - if i get chance I might take a look at a couple
of others on that list.
In in the case of edb it’s looking a lot like the maintainer is
unresponsive - probably like for many of the package on that list.
Thanks,
Michael


On Mon, 23 Oct 2017, at 08:56 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 15:49 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> > On 10/22/2017 04:08 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> > > Mat Booth wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 7 August 2017 at 15:35, Dennis Gilmore 
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failure> > > 
> > > > > > > s.html
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > This file seems suspiciously small... I somehow don't believe
> > > > that there
> > > > were "0 failed builds" :-)
> > >
> > > Current status?
> >
> > Digging a bit deeper, there are ~880 packages with building
> > problems.> > Some of them since fedora 20/21:
>
> maybe more , we got some bug trackers like :
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423041
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305208
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239338
>
>
> > compat-gcc-296-2.96-146.1
> > fedora-package-config-apt-16.00-10
> > ivtv-firmware-20080701-32
> > reinteract-0.5.9-16
> > shim-signed-13-0.7
> > xml2dict-0-0.12.2008.6.1
> > rubygem-dynect_rest-0.4.3-6 | fc20
> > dia-gnomeDIAicons-0.1-5 | fc21
> > diveintopython-5.4-27 | fc21
> > jam-control-1.03-4 | fc21
> > libverto-jsonrpc-0.1.0-9 | fc21
> > NearTree-3.1.1-8 | fc21
> > OpenStego-0.5.2-14 | fc21
> > publican-fedora-4.0-2 | fc21
> > python-pylons-1.0.1-3 | fc21
> > ratbox-services-1.2.1-11 | fc21
> > R-BSgenome-1.32.0-1 | fc21
> > R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2-1.3.19-5 | fc21
> > R-GenomicFeatures-1.14.2-2 | fc21
> > rubygem-arrayfields-4.7.4-10 | fc21
> > rubygem-attributes-5.0.1-14 | fc21
> > rubygem-chunky_png-1.2.7-3 | fc21
> > rubygem-climate_control-0.0.3-5 | fc21
> > rubygem-coercible-1.0.0-3 | fc21
> > rubygem-dotenv-0.8.0-3 | fc21
> > rubygem-facets-2.8.0-9 | fc21
> > rubygem-git-1.2.5-9 | fc21
> > rubygem-gruff-0.3.6-8 | fc21
> > rubygem-hawler-0.3-13 | fc21
> > rubygem-hydra-0.24.0-6 | fc21
> > rubygem-kwalify-0.7.2-10 | fc21
> > rubygem-markaby-0.5-12 | fc21
> > rubygem-mixlib-authentication-1.3.0-6 | fc21
> > rubygem-mixlib-log-1.6.0-3 | fc21
> > rubygem-orm_adapter-0.5.0-2 | fc21
> > rubygem-pervasives-1.1.0-13 | fc21
> > rubygem-picnic-0.8.1-10 | fc21
> > rubygem-rails_autolink-1.1.6-1 | fc21
> > rubygem-resque-1.25.2-4 | fc21
> > rubygem-restr-0.5.0-10 | fc21
> > rubygem-reststop-0.4.0-10 | fc21
> > rubygem-rmail-1.0.0-11 | fc21
> > rubygem-rspec-longrun-0.1.2-4 | fc21
> > rubygem-rufus-scheduler-2.0.4-9 | fc21
> > rubygem-systemu-2.6.4-2 | fc21
> > rubygem-xmpp4r-0.5-11 | fc21
> > rubygem-xmpp4r-simple-0.8.8-11 | fc21
> > R-xtable-1.7.1-4 | fc21
> > umit-1.0-3 | fc21
> > eurephia-1.1.0-9 | fc22
> > gitstats-0-0.7.20141209gitc2310a8 | fc22
> > hail-0.8-0.16.gf9c5b967 | fc22
> > hive-0.12.0-5 | fc22
> > intrace-1.5-6 | fc22
> > ircd-ratbox-2.2.9-3 | fc22
> > kde-plasma-activitymanager-0.5-8 | fc22
> > kguitar-0.5.1-19.926svn | fc22
> > libkdtree++-0.7.0-8 | fc22
> > monodevelop-debugger-gdb-2.8.8.4-6 | fc22
> > oscap-anaconda-addon-0.7-1 | fc22
> > pam_radius-1.4.0-2 | fc22
> > pdfresurrect-0.12-5 | fc22
> > prozilla-2.0.4-18 | fc22
> > python-djvulibre-0.3.9-4 | fc22
> > python-pyblock-0.53-8 | fc22
> > rubygem-authlogic-3.4.2-1 | fc22
> > rubygem-cookiejar-0.3.2-5 | fc22
> > rubygem-facade-1.0.5-3 | fc22
> > rubygem-innertube-1.1.0-4 | fc22
> > rubygem-mono_logger-1.1.0-3 | fc22
> > rubygem-taskjuggler-3.5.0-1 | fc22
> > rubygem-text-format-1.0.0-13 | fc22
> > shim-0.8-1 | fc22
> > sslogger-0.96-13 | fc22
> > steadyflow-0.2.0-4 | fc22
> > telepathy-haze-0.8.0-3 | fc22
> > udev-browse-0.3-5 | fc22
> > auriferous-1.0.1-20 | fc23
> > brewtarget-2.1.0-3 | fc23
> > centerim-4.22.10-19 | fc23
> > cuneiform-1.1.0-20 | fc23
> > escape-200912250-12 | fc23
> > facter-2.4.3-1 | fc23
> > fbdesk-1.4.1-19 | fc23
> > fbreader-0.12.10-18 | fc23
> > fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme-1.0.0-10 | fc23
> > fedora-screensaver-theme-1.0.0-12 | fc23
> > freehdl-0.0.8-12 | fc23
> > gnue-common-0.6.9-16 | fc23
> > golang-github-influxdb-gomdb-0-0.2.git29fe330 | fc23
> > gtkmathview-0.8.0-19 | fc23
> > horst-3.0-6 | fc23
> > ibus-unikey-0.6.1-9 | fc23
> > kawa-2.0-2 | fc23
> > klatexformula-3.2.10-5 | fc23
> > kmplayer-0.11.3c-10 | fc23
> > libexplain-1.4-4 | fc23
> > libmimedir-0.4-14 | fc23
> > libtaginfo-0.2.0-5 | fc23
> > loki-lib-0.1.7-13 | fc23
> > manaplus-1.3.10.27.2-8 | fc23
> > mod_ruid2-0.9.8-3 | fc23
> > opal-3.10.10-9 | fc23
> > ortp-0.23.0-2 | fc23
> > pikdev-0.9.2-21 | fc23
> > piklab-0.16.1-12 | fc23
> > pyrrd-0.1.0-8 | fc23
> > python-jabberbot-0.15-4 | fc23
> > python-kiwi-1.9.38-5 | fc23
> > python-pottymouth-2.2.1-7 | fc23
> > python-subvertpy-0.9.1-6 | fc23
> > qdevelop-0.29-5 | fc23
> > qtoctave-0.10.1-19 | fc23
> > qutim-0.3.2-5.git.6f3a98a | fc23
> > 

[Bug 1505126] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171020 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505126



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171020-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3749a6a7d8

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505087] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.40 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505087



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.40-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-83f341450b

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1503228] perl-Lingua-Translit-0.28 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503228



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Lingua-Translit-0.28-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-beac2c4b27

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours

[nils]

Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
   Modularity Office Hours on 2017-10-24 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern
   At https://meet.jit.si/fedora-modularity

The meeting will be about:
This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to 
answer them)!

Join us on [IRC](irc://chat.freenode.net/#fedora-modularity): 
#fedora-modularity on [FreeNode](https://freenode.net)


Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/5910/

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1502214] abi-compliance-checker: behavior changed within f25 release

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1502214



--- Comment #2 from Richard Shaw  ---
Unfortunately upstream didn't mention this in the changelog but the only way to
fix it would be to bump the Epoch and rebuild. 

While inconvenient, I would think the bug fixes and new features are preferable
to downgrading the package at this point.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Mass rebuilds update

[Sérgio Basto]

On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 15:49 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> On 10/22/2017 04:08 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> > Mat Booth wrote:
> > 
> > > On 7 August 2017 at 15:35, Dennis Gilmore 
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > > [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failure
> > > > s.html
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > This file seems suspiciously small... I somehow don't believe
> > > that there
> > > were "0 failed builds" :-)
> > 
> > Current status?
> 
> Digging a bit deeper, there are ~880 packages with building problems.
> Some of them since fedora 20/21:

maybe more , we got some bug trackers like : 

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423041
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305208
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239338


> compat-gcc-296-2.96-146.1
> fedora-package-config-apt-16.00-10
> ivtv-firmware-20080701-32
> reinteract-0.5.9-16
> shim-signed-13-0.7
> xml2dict-0-0.12.2008.6.1
> rubygem-dynect_rest-0.4.3-6 | fc20
> dia-gnomeDIAicons-0.1-5 | fc21
> diveintopython-5.4-27 | fc21
> jam-control-1.03-4 | fc21
> libverto-jsonrpc-0.1.0-9 | fc21
> NearTree-3.1.1-8 | fc21
> OpenStego-0.5.2-14 | fc21
> publican-fedora-4.0-2 | fc21
> python-pylons-1.0.1-3 | fc21
> ratbox-services-1.2.1-11 | fc21
> R-BSgenome-1.32.0-1 | fc21
> R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2-1.3.19-5 | fc21
> R-GenomicFeatures-1.14.2-2 | fc21
> rubygem-arrayfields-4.7.4-10 | fc21
> rubygem-attributes-5.0.1-14 | fc21
> rubygem-chunky_png-1.2.7-3 | fc21
> rubygem-climate_control-0.0.3-5 | fc21
> rubygem-coercible-1.0.0-3 | fc21
> rubygem-dotenv-0.8.0-3 | fc21
> rubygem-facets-2.8.0-9 | fc21
> rubygem-git-1.2.5-9 | fc21
> rubygem-gruff-0.3.6-8 | fc21
> rubygem-hawler-0.3-13 | fc21
> rubygem-hydra-0.24.0-6 | fc21
> rubygem-kwalify-0.7.2-10 | fc21
> rubygem-markaby-0.5-12 | fc21
> rubygem-mixlib-authentication-1.3.0-6 | fc21
> rubygem-mixlib-log-1.6.0-3 | fc21
> rubygem-orm_adapter-0.5.0-2 | fc21
> rubygem-pervasives-1.1.0-13 | fc21
> rubygem-picnic-0.8.1-10 | fc21
> rubygem-rails_autolink-1.1.6-1 | fc21
> rubygem-resque-1.25.2-4 | fc21
> rubygem-restr-0.5.0-10 | fc21
> rubygem-reststop-0.4.0-10 | fc21
> rubygem-rmail-1.0.0-11 | fc21
> rubygem-rspec-longrun-0.1.2-4 | fc21
> rubygem-rufus-scheduler-2.0.4-9 | fc21
> rubygem-systemu-2.6.4-2 | fc21
> rubygem-xmpp4r-0.5-11 | fc21
> rubygem-xmpp4r-simple-0.8.8-11 | fc21
> R-xtable-1.7.1-4 | fc21
> umit-1.0-3 | fc21
> eurephia-1.1.0-9 | fc22
> gitstats-0-0.7.20141209gitc2310a8 | fc22
> hail-0.8-0.16.gf9c5b967 | fc22
> hive-0.12.0-5 | fc22
> intrace-1.5-6 | fc22
> ircd-ratbox-2.2.9-3 | fc22
> kde-plasma-activitymanager-0.5-8 | fc22
> kguitar-0.5.1-19.926svn | fc22
> libkdtree++-0.7.0-8 | fc22
> monodevelop-debugger-gdb-2.8.8.4-6 | fc22
> oscap-anaconda-addon-0.7-1 | fc22
> pam_radius-1.4.0-2 | fc22
> pdfresurrect-0.12-5 | fc22
> prozilla-2.0.4-18 | fc22
> python-djvulibre-0.3.9-4 | fc22
> python-pyblock-0.53-8 | fc22
> rubygem-authlogic-3.4.2-1 | fc22
> rubygem-cookiejar-0.3.2-5 | fc22
> rubygem-facade-1.0.5-3 | fc22
> rubygem-innertube-1.1.0-4 | fc22
> rubygem-mono_logger-1.1.0-3 | fc22
> rubygem-taskjuggler-3.5.0-1 | fc22
> rubygem-text-format-1.0.0-13 | fc22
> shim-0.8-1 | fc22
> sslogger-0.96-13 | fc22
> steadyflow-0.2.0-4 | fc22
> telepathy-haze-0.8.0-3 | fc22
> udev-browse-0.3-5 | fc22
> auriferous-1.0.1-20 | fc23
> brewtarget-2.1.0-3 | fc23
> centerim-4.22.10-19 | fc23
> cuneiform-1.1.0-20 | fc23
> escape-200912250-12 | fc23
> facter-2.4.3-1 | fc23
> fbdesk-1.4.1-19 | fc23
> fbreader-0.12.10-18 | fc23
> fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme-1.0.0-10 | fc23
> fedora-screensaver-theme-1.0.0-12 | fc23
> freehdl-0.0.8-12 | fc23
> gnue-common-0.6.9-16 | fc23
> golang-github-influxdb-gomdb-0-0.2.git29fe330 | fc23
> gtkmathview-0.8.0-19 | fc23
> horst-3.0-6 | fc23
> ibus-unikey-0.6.1-9 | fc23
> kawa-2.0-2 | fc23
> klatexformula-3.2.10-5 | fc23
> kmplayer-0.11.3c-10 | fc23
> libexplain-1.4-4 | fc23
> libmimedir-0.4-14 | fc23
> libtaginfo-0.2.0-5 | fc23
> loki-lib-0.1.7-13 | fc23
> manaplus-1.3.10.27.2-8 | fc23
> mod_ruid2-0.9.8-3 | fc23
> opal-3.10.10-9 | fc23
> ortp-0.23.0-2 | fc23
> pikdev-0.9.2-21 | fc23
> piklab-0.16.1-12 | fc23
> pyrrd-0.1.0-8 | fc23
> python-jabberbot-0.15-4 | fc23
> python-kiwi-1.9.38-5 | fc23
> python-pottymouth-2.2.1-7 | fc23
> python-subvertpy-0.9.1-6 | fc23
> qdevelop-0.29-5 | fc23
> qtoctave-0.10.1-19 | fc23
> qutim-0.3.2-5.git.6f3a98a | fc23
> rapidsvn-0.12.1-7 | fc23
> R-car-2.0.19-3 | fc23
> R-GeneR-2.24.0-11 | fc23
> R-TH-data-1.0.3-3 | fc23
> rubygem-bunny-0.7.9-7 | fc23
> rubygem-hipchat-1.4.0-2 | fc23
> rubygem-net-ssh-multi-1.2.0-4 | fc23
> rubygem-openstack-quantum-client-0.1.5-9 | fc23
> rubygem-pathname2-1.7.3-3 | fc23
> rubygem-puppet-lint-1.1.0-2 | fc23
> rubygem-sanitize-2.1.0-5 | fc23
> rubygem-virtus-1.0.5-1 | fc23
> svnkit-1.8.5-3 | fc23
> synaptic-0.57.2-38 | fc23
> taskjuggler-2.4.3-22 | fc23
> tboot-1.8.2-3 | fc23
> teal-1_40b-14 | fc23
> activemq-cpp-3.8.4-4 | fc24
> apanov-edrip-fonts-20100430-11 | fc24
> 

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

[Ville Skyttä]

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Francisco J. Tsao Santin
 wrote:
> I can take netmask :-)

Transferred, thanks.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

[Francisco J. Tsao Santin]

I can take netmask :-)

On Mon, 23 Oct 2017, Ville Skyttä wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> The following packages are looking for new maintainers, ping me if
> you're able to help out.
> 
> 1) No co-maintainers at the moment:
> 
> - git-bz
> - isrcsubmit
> - jing-trang
> - kid3
> - mbox2eml
> - modplugtools
> - netmask
> - portecle
> - python-flake8-import-order
> - vdr-epgfixer
> - vdr-ttxtsubs
> 
> 2) Needs new main admin, co-maintainers pinged some time ago but no
> reply received/noticed:
> 
> - ccache
> - libmodplug
> - pyflakes
> - python-libdiscid
> - reptyr
> - rpmdevtools
> - zopfli
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 

-- 
Francisco Javier Tsao Santín
http://gattaca.es
1024D/71CF4D62  42 F1 53 35 EF 98 98 8A FC 6C 56 B3 4C A7 7D FB___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Modular bikeshed compose report: 20171023.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171017.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:11
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  15
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   23
Downgraded packages: 11

Size of added packages:  60.71 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages:   813.19 MiB
Size of downgraded packages: 54.18 MiB

Size change of upgraded packages:   -1.20 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 11.31 KiB

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Server boot x86_64
Path: 
Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Modular-Server-netinst-x86_64-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0.iso
Image: Server raw-xz x86_64
Path: 
Server/x86_64/images/Fedora-Modular-Server-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0.x86_64.raw.xz
Image: Server raw-xz aarch64
Path: 
Server/aarch64/images/Fedora-Modular-Server-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz
Image: Server qcow2 x86_64
Path: 
Server/x86_64/images/Fedora-Modular-Server-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0.x86_64.qcow2
Image: Server boot i386
Path: 
Server/i386/iso/Fedora-Modular-Server-netinst-i386-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0.iso
Image: Server qcow2 aarch64
Path: 
Server/aarch64/images/Fedora-Modular-Server-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0.aarch64.qcow2
Image: Server boot aarch64
Path: 
Server/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Modular-Server-netinst-aarch64-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0.iso
Image: Server dvd i386
Path: Server/i386/iso/Fedora-Modular-Server-dvd-i386-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0.iso
Image: Server dvd aarch64
Path: 
Server/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Modular-Server-dvd-aarch64-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0.iso
Image: Server dvd x86_64
Path: 
Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Modular-Server-dvd-x86_64-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0.iso
Image: Server boot ppc64
Path: 
Server/ppc64/iso/Fedora-Modular-Server-netinst-ppc64-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: gperftools-2.6.1-5.module_4b5f94c2
Summary: Very fast malloc and performance analysis tools
RPMs:gperftools gperftools-devel gperftools-libs pprof
Size:4970652 bytes

Package: pyOpenSSL-17.3.0-2.module_aeca2e51
Summary: Python wrapper module around the OpenSSL library
RPMs:pyOpenSSL-doc python3-pyOpenSSL
Size:1297404 bytes

Package: pyserial-3.1.1-5.module_aeca2e51
Summary: Python serial port access library
RPMs:python2-pyserial python3-pyserial
Size:343464 bytes

Package: python-asn1crypto-0.23.0-1.module_aeca2e51
Summary: Fast Python ASN.1 parser and serializer
RPMs:python2-asn1crypto python3-asn1crypto
Size:360128 bytes

Package: python-cffi-1.11.0-2.module_aeca2e51
Summary: Foreign Function Interface for Python to call C code
RPMs:python-cffi-doc python3-cffi
Size:1959088 bytes

Package: python-chardet-3.0.4-3.module_aeca2e51
Summary: Character encoding auto-detection in Python
RPMs:python2-chardet python3-chardet
Size:392100 bytes

Package: python-configobj-5.0.6-9.module_aeca2e51
Summary: Config file reading, writing, and validation
RPMs:python3-configobj
Size:68468 bytes

Package: python-cryptography-vectors-2.1-2.module_aeca2e51
Summary: Test vectors for the cryptography package
RPMs:python2-cryptography-vectors python3-cryptography-vectors
Size:49525660 bytes

Package: python-idna-2.5-2.module_aeca2e51
Summary: Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA)
RPMs:python3-idna
Size:97796 bytes

Package: python-ply-3.9-5.module_aeca2e51
Summary: Python Lex-Yacc
RPMs:python3-ply
Size:109284 bytes

Package: python-prettytable-0.7.2-12.module_aeca2e51
Summary: Python library to display tabular data in tables
RPMs:python2-prettytable python3-prettytable
Size:86536 bytes

Package: python-pycparser-2.14-12.module_aeca2e51
Summary: C parser and AST generator written in Python
RPMs:python3-pycparser
Size:149836 bytes

Package: python-pysocks-1.6.7-1.module_aeca2e51
Summary: A Python SOCKS client module
RPMs:python3-pysocks
Size:33240 bytes

Package: python-urllib3-1.22-2.module_aeca2e51
Summary: Python HTTP library with thread-safe connection pooling and file post
RPMs:python3-urllib3
Size:191260 bytes

Package: xmlrpc-c-1.49.02-2.module_271836b6
Summary: A lightweight RPC library based on XML and HTTP
RPMs:xmlrpc-c xmlrpc-c-apps xmlrpc-c-c++ xmlrpc-c-client xmlrpc-c-client++ 
xmlrpc-c-devel
Size:4074252 bytes


= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  389-ds-base-1.4.0.1-1.module_4b5f94c2
Old package:  389-ds-base-1.3.7.4-1.module_506864e9
Summary:  389 Directory Server (base)
RPMs: 389-ds-base 389-ds-base-devel 389-ds-base-libs 389-ds-base-snmp 
python3-389-ds-base-tests
Size: 22700528 bytes
Size change:  10592 bytes
Changelog:
  * Fri Sep 22 2017 Mark Reynolds <mreyno...@redhat.com> - 1.4.0.0-1
  - Bump version to 1.4.0.0-1

  * Mon Oct 09 2017 Mark Reynolds <mreyno...@redhat.com> - 1.4.0.1-1
  - Bump version to 1.4.0.1-1
  - Ticket 49038 - remove legacy replication - change cleanup script precedence
  - Ticket 49392 - memavailable n

Packages looking for new maintainers

[Ville Skyttä]

Hello,

The following packages are looking for new maintainers, ping me if
you're able to help out.

1) No co-maintainers at the moment:

- git-bz
- isrcsubmit
- jing-trang
- kid3
- mbox2eml
- modplugtools
- netmask
- portecle
- python-flake8-import-order
- vdr-epgfixer
- vdr-ttxtsubs

2) Needs new main admin, co-maintainers pinged some time ago but no
reply received/noticed:

- ccache
- libmodplug
- pyflakes
- python-libdiscid
- reptyr
- rpmdevtools
- zopfli
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505420] Upgrade perl-Test-Simple to 1.302106

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505420

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Simple-1.302106-1
   ||.fc28
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2017-10-23 14:22:09



--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth  ---
Build done:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22652747

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505411] Upgrade perl-IO-Socket-SSL to 2.052

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505411

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-IO-Socket-SSL-2.052-1.
   ||fc28
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2017-10-23 14:08:57



--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth  ---
Build done:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22652652

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 27-20171023.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Workstation live i386
Kde live i386

Failed openQA tests: 16/137 (x86_64), 2/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171021.n.0):

ID: 160907  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160907
ID: 160922  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160922
ID: 160967  Test: x86_64 Atomic-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160967
ID: 160980  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160980
ID: 161008  Test: x86_64 universal install_shrink_ntfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161008
ID: 161010  Test: x86_64 universal install_multi_empty@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161010
ID: 161032  Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161032
ID: 161035  Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161035
ID: 161051  Test: i386 universal install_lvmthin
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161051
ID: 161072  Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161072

Old failures (same test failed in 27-20171021.n.0):

ID: 160911  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160911
ID: 160935  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160935
ID: 160937  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160937
ID: 160956  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160956
ID: 160964  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160964
ID: 160966  Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start_arm
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160966
ID: 160971  Test: x86_64 Workstation Ostree-dvd_ostree-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160971
ID: 160973  Test: x86_64 Workstation Ostree-dvd_ostree-iso 
base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160973
ID: 161020  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161020

Soft failed openQA tests: 5/137 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in 27-20171021.n.0):

ID: 160982  Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160982
ID: 161007  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161007
ID: 161015  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161015
ID: 161023  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161023
ID: 161025  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161025

Passed openQA tests: 115/137 (x86_64), 20/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

New passes (same test did not pass in 27-20171021.n.0):

ID: 160951  Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160951
ID: 160953  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160953
ID: 160975  Test: x86_64 Workstation Ostree-dvd_ostree-iso 
base_system_logging
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160975

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload: 
System load changed from 0.22 to 0.10
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160049#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160908#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso 
install_default_upload: 
System load changed from 0.59 to 0.79
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160074#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160933#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso 
install_default@uefi: 
System load changed from 0.47 to 0.73
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160075#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160934#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default: 
System load changed from 0.78 to 0.67
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160209#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160946#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso 
install_default@uefi: 
System load changed from 0.39 to 0.59
Previous test data: 

[Bug 1505088] perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.12 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505088

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.12-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ea5694ddf6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505117] perl-App-Cme-1.024 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505117

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-App-Cme-1.024-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-422cd3ce18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505141] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000082 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505141

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Test2-Suite-0.82-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-90fc5e1d14

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505135] perl-PAR-Packer-1.040 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505135

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-PAR-Packer-1.040-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ac922c636c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505087] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.40 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505087

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.40-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-267e79bae2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505126] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171020 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505126

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171020-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-cc3cfc0d2f

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171013.n.0 changes

[Fedora Branched Report]

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =

= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Improving Linux laptop battery life: Testers Wanted

[Chris Murphy]

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017, 3:13 PM Hans de Goede  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 21-10-17 20:50, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On 09/14/2017 04:22 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> My next project for Red Hat is to work on improving Linux laptop battery
> >> life.
> >> Part of the (hopefully) low hanging fruit here is using kernel tunables
> to
> >> enable more runtime powermanagement. My first target here is SATA Link
> >> Power
> >> Management (LPM) which, as Matthew Garrett blogged about 2 years ago:
> >> https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/34868.html
> >> can lead to a significant improvement in battery life.
> >>
> >> There is only one small problem, there have been some reports that some
> >> disks/SSDs don't play well with Linux' min_power LPM policy and that
> this
> >> may lead to system crashes and even data corruption.
> >>
> >> As such I've written a new LPM policy, which matches the
> power-management
> >> defaults from the Intel RST Windows drivers. Since it mimicks Windows,
> >> this new policy will hopefully not hit any SSD firmware bugs like
> min_power
> >> sometimes does.
> >>
> >> So now I'm looking for people with a laptop with a SATA SSD or HDD to
> help
> >> me test this to make sure this won't cause any issues when we enable
> this
> >> by default for F28, for more details and test instructions see:
> >>
> >> https://hansdegoede.livejournal.com/18412.html
> >
> > Hey Hans. I had marked this to try and do to help gather info, but
> > things have been busy and I haven't ever gotten to it.
> >
> > I thought before I did I might ask if you already have the info you were
> > looking for since it's been over a month now.
> >
> > How have reports been? Is it perhaps time to enable this in rawhide?
>
> I've had successful test reports from 10 people, of which 1 person
> was actually seeing data corruption on his ssd with min_power and not
> with the new med_power_with_dipm policy my patches add, which is good
> news really :)
>
> But 10 testers is not that much, so if you still feel like testing this,
> then some more testing would definitely be welcome.
>

I'm curious what the manifestation of corruption is, and whether any on the
10 were using Btrfs?


Chris Murphy

>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: GCL and SELinux: help requested

[Lukas Vrabec]

On 10/21/2017 08:48 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:

On 10/20/2017 05:12 AM, Lukas Vrabec wrote:


Hello community,


Hey Lukas. Thanks for chiming in here.


We, as Red Hat SELinux team, apologise for recent delays with our
answers to your requests and questions related to SELinux. We have been
quite busy last couple of weeks so we decided to set a lower priority
for Fedora work. We already responded and resolved what was needed and
we are ready to react more flexibly in the future.


Perhaps you could outline the best ways for people to contribute/get
attention? bugzilla bugs? github issues? PR's?

Also, perhaps it would make sense to move to a more normal looking
release flow instead of a massive patch? I think that might make it
easier to see whats going on and how to contribute.



This "massive" patch is here because, we diverted from Upsteam policy. 
Because Upstream policy is much more strict, you cannot even boot F26+ 
just with upstream policy. We confine more services then upstream and 
we're more benevolent.


This should change, and we're trying to focus on technical solution 
which should decrease amount of maintenance of selinux-policy. We'll 
inform you about this project.




Note: If you are interested in writing custom SELinux policy for your
package, you can follow the
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux/IndependentPolicy documentation
on wiki.


Perhaps you could submit this to the FPC and get it reviewed and moved
under the normal packaging space?



Will do.

Lukas.


Thanks again,

kevin



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org




--
Lukas Vrabec
Software Engineer, Security Technologies
Red Hat, Inc.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Mass rebuilds update

[Xose Vazquez Perez]

On 10/23/2017 04:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:

>> rbldnsd-0.998-3 | fc26
> 
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=3720
> 
> 1 through 46 of 46
> NVR Built by Finished descending sort State
> rbldnsd-0.998-4.fc27 releng 2017-07-29 15:10:37 complete
> rbldnsd-0.998-3.fc26 releng 2017-02-12 07:20:00 complete
> rbldnsd-0.998-2.fc24 releng 2016-02-05 04:28:54 complete

rbldnsd-0.998-4.fc27 is not tagged for fedora 27.


# hostnamectl  | egrep "Operating|CPE"
  Operating System: Fedora 27 (Workstation Edition)
   CPE OS Name: cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:27

# dnf install rbldnsd
Last metadata expiration check: 1:31:34 ago on Mon 23 Oct 2017 03:13:25 PM CEST.
Dependencies resolved.
===
 Package  ArchVersion   
 Repository   Size
===
Installing:
 rbldnsd  x86_64  0.998-3.fc26  
 fedora  115 k

Transaction Summary
===
Install  1 Package

Total download size: 115 k
Installed size: 213 k
Is this ok [y/N]:
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Rawhide-20171023.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386

Failed openQA tests: 17/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171022.n.1):

ID: 160760  Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160760
ID: 160813  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160813
ID: 160840  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160840

Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20171022.n.1):

ID: 160742  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160742
ID: 160749  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160749
ID: 160763  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160763
ID: 160765  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160765
ID: 160771  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160771
ID: 160782  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160782
ID: 160788  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160788
ID: 160790  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160790
ID: 160791  Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160791
ID: 160796  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160796
ID: 160797  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160797
ID: 160809  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160809
ID: 160824  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160824
ID: 160832  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160832
ID: 160837  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160837

Soft failed openQA tests: 6/128 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft failures (same test did not soft fail in Rawhide-20171022.n.1):

ID: 160780  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160780
ID: 160842  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160842

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Rawhide-20171022.n.1):

ID: 160779  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160779
ID: 160799  Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160799
ID: 160819  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160819
ID: 160841  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160841

Passed openQA tests: 101/128 (x86_64)

New passes (same test did not pass in Rawhide-20171022.n.1):

ID: 160747  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160747
ID: 160762  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160762
ID: 160778  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160778
ID: 160789  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160789
ID: 160838  Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160838

Skipped openQA tests: 1 of 130

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi: 
System load changed from 0.12 to 0.33
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160585#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160737#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default: 
System load changed from 0.05 to 0.21
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160586#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160738#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default: 
System load changed from 1.15 to 0.73
Average CPU usage changed from 38.67142857 to 27.35238095
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160622#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160774#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso 

[Bug 1505420] New: Upgrade perl-Test-Simple to 1.302106

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505420

Bug ID: 1505420
   Summary: Upgrade perl-Test-Simple to 1.302106
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Test-Simple
  Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, p...@city-fan.org,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com



Latest Fedora delivers 1.302103 version. Upstream released 1.302106. When you
have free time, please upgrade it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505413] New: Upgrade perl-File-LibMagic to 1.16

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505413

Bug ID: 1505413
   Summary: Upgrade perl-File-LibMagic to 1.16
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-File-LibMagic
  Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
rob.my...@gtri.gatech.edu



Latest Fedora delivers 1.15 version. Upstream released 1.16. When you have free
time, please upgrade it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505411] New: Upgrade perl-IO-Socket-SSL to 2.052

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505411

Bug ID: 1505411
   Summary: Upgrade perl-IO-Socket-SSL to 2.052
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-IO-Socket-SSL
  Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: al...@redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproj...@gmail.com,
caol...@redhat.com, jose.p.oliveira@gmail.com,
mbar...@fastmail.com, p...@city-fan.org,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
rhug...@redhat.com, rstr...@redhat.com,
sandm...@redhat.com



Latest Fedora delivers 2.051 version. Upstream released 2.052. When you have
free time, please upgrade it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Improving Linux laptop battery life: Testers Wanted

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 21-10-17 20:50, Kevin Fenzi wrote:

On 09/14/2017 04:22 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:

Hi All,

My next project for Red Hat is to work on improving Linux laptop battery
life.
Part of the (hopefully) low hanging fruit here is using kernel tunables to
enable more runtime powermanagement. My first target here is SATA Link
Power
Management (LPM) which, as Matthew Garrett blogged about 2 years ago:
https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/34868.html
can lead to a significant improvement in battery life.

There is only one small problem, there have been some reports that some
disks/SSDs don't play well with Linux' min_power LPM policy and that this
may lead to system crashes and even data corruption.

As such I've written a new LPM policy, which matches the power-management
defaults from the Intel RST Windows drivers. Since it mimicks Windows,
this new policy will hopefully not hit any SSD firmware bugs like min_power
sometimes does.

So now I'm looking for people with a laptop with a SATA SSD or HDD to help
me test this to make sure this won't cause any issues when we enable this
by default for F28, for more details and test instructions see:

https://hansdegoede.livejournal.com/18412.html


Hey Hans. I had marked this to try and do to help gather info, but
things have been busy and I haven't ever gotten to it.

I thought before I did I might ask if you already have the info you were
looking for since it's been over a month now.

How have reports been? Is it perhaps time to enable this in rawhide?


I've had successful test reports from 10 people, of which 1 person
was actually seeing data corruption on his ssd with min_power and not
with the new med_power_with_dipm policy my patches add, which is good
news really :)

But 10 testers is not that much, so if you still feel like testing this,
then some more testing would definitely be welcome.

Regards,

Hans
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Mass rebuilds update

[Xose Vazquez Perez]

On 10/22/2017 04:08 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> Mat Booth wrote:
> 
>> On 7 August 2017 at 15:35, Dennis Gilmore  wrote:
>>
>>> [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.html
>>>
>>
>> This file seems suspiciously small... I somehow don't believe that there
>> were "0 failed builds" :-)
> Current status?

Digging a bit deeper, there are ~880 packages with building problems.
Some of them since fedora 20/21:

compat-gcc-296-2.96-146.1
fedora-package-config-apt-16.00-10
ivtv-firmware-20080701-32
reinteract-0.5.9-16
shim-signed-13-0.7
xml2dict-0-0.12.2008.6.1
rubygem-dynect_rest-0.4.3-6 | fc20
dia-gnomeDIAicons-0.1-5 | fc21
diveintopython-5.4-27 | fc21
jam-control-1.03-4 | fc21
libverto-jsonrpc-0.1.0-9 | fc21
NearTree-3.1.1-8 | fc21
OpenStego-0.5.2-14 | fc21
publican-fedora-4.0-2 | fc21
python-pylons-1.0.1-3 | fc21
ratbox-services-1.2.1-11 | fc21
R-BSgenome-1.32.0-1 | fc21
R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2-1.3.19-5 | fc21
R-GenomicFeatures-1.14.2-2 | fc21
rubygem-arrayfields-4.7.4-10 | fc21
rubygem-attributes-5.0.1-14 | fc21
rubygem-chunky_png-1.2.7-3 | fc21
rubygem-climate_control-0.0.3-5 | fc21
rubygem-coercible-1.0.0-3 | fc21
rubygem-dotenv-0.8.0-3 | fc21
rubygem-facets-2.8.0-9 | fc21
rubygem-git-1.2.5-9 | fc21
rubygem-gruff-0.3.6-8 | fc21
rubygem-hawler-0.3-13 | fc21
rubygem-hydra-0.24.0-6 | fc21
rubygem-kwalify-0.7.2-10 | fc21
rubygem-markaby-0.5-12 | fc21
rubygem-mixlib-authentication-1.3.0-6 | fc21
rubygem-mixlib-log-1.6.0-3 | fc21
rubygem-orm_adapter-0.5.0-2 | fc21
rubygem-pervasives-1.1.0-13 | fc21
rubygem-picnic-0.8.1-10 | fc21
rubygem-rails_autolink-1.1.6-1 | fc21
rubygem-resque-1.25.2-4 | fc21
rubygem-restr-0.5.0-10 | fc21
rubygem-reststop-0.4.0-10 | fc21
rubygem-rmail-1.0.0-11 | fc21
rubygem-rspec-longrun-0.1.2-4 | fc21
rubygem-rufus-scheduler-2.0.4-9 | fc21
rubygem-systemu-2.6.4-2 | fc21
rubygem-xmpp4r-0.5-11 | fc21
rubygem-xmpp4r-simple-0.8.8-11 | fc21
R-xtable-1.7.1-4 | fc21
umit-1.0-3 | fc21
eurephia-1.1.0-9 | fc22
gitstats-0-0.7.20141209gitc2310a8 | fc22
hail-0.8-0.16.gf9c5b967 | fc22
hive-0.12.0-5 | fc22
intrace-1.5-6 | fc22
ircd-ratbox-2.2.9-3 | fc22
kde-plasma-activitymanager-0.5-8 | fc22
kguitar-0.5.1-19.926svn | fc22
libkdtree++-0.7.0-8 | fc22
monodevelop-debugger-gdb-2.8.8.4-6 | fc22
oscap-anaconda-addon-0.7-1 | fc22
pam_radius-1.4.0-2 | fc22
pdfresurrect-0.12-5 | fc22
prozilla-2.0.4-18 | fc22
python-djvulibre-0.3.9-4 | fc22
python-pyblock-0.53-8 | fc22
rubygem-authlogic-3.4.2-1 | fc22
rubygem-cookiejar-0.3.2-5 | fc22
rubygem-facade-1.0.5-3 | fc22
rubygem-innertube-1.1.0-4 | fc22
rubygem-mono_logger-1.1.0-3 | fc22
rubygem-taskjuggler-3.5.0-1 | fc22
rubygem-text-format-1.0.0-13 | fc22
shim-0.8-1 | fc22
sslogger-0.96-13 | fc22
steadyflow-0.2.0-4 | fc22
telepathy-haze-0.8.0-3 | fc22
udev-browse-0.3-5 | fc22
auriferous-1.0.1-20 | fc23
brewtarget-2.1.0-3 | fc23
centerim-4.22.10-19 | fc23
cuneiform-1.1.0-20 | fc23
escape-200912250-12 | fc23
facter-2.4.3-1 | fc23
fbdesk-1.4.1-19 | fc23
fbreader-0.12.10-18 | fc23
fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme-1.0.0-10 | fc23
fedora-screensaver-theme-1.0.0-12 | fc23
freehdl-0.0.8-12 | fc23
gnue-common-0.6.9-16 | fc23
golang-github-influxdb-gomdb-0-0.2.git29fe330 | fc23
gtkmathview-0.8.0-19 | fc23
horst-3.0-6 | fc23
ibus-unikey-0.6.1-9 | fc23
kawa-2.0-2 | fc23
klatexformula-3.2.10-5 | fc23
kmplayer-0.11.3c-10 | fc23
libexplain-1.4-4 | fc23
libmimedir-0.4-14 | fc23
libtaginfo-0.2.0-5 | fc23
loki-lib-0.1.7-13 | fc23
manaplus-1.3.10.27.2-8 | fc23
mod_ruid2-0.9.8-3 | fc23
opal-3.10.10-9 | fc23
ortp-0.23.0-2 | fc23
pikdev-0.9.2-21 | fc23
piklab-0.16.1-12 | fc23
pyrrd-0.1.0-8 | fc23
python-jabberbot-0.15-4 | fc23
python-kiwi-1.9.38-5 | fc23
python-pottymouth-2.2.1-7 | fc23
python-subvertpy-0.9.1-6 | fc23
qdevelop-0.29-5 | fc23
qtoctave-0.10.1-19 | fc23
qutim-0.3.2-5.git.6f3a98a | fc23
rapidsvn-0.12.1-7 | fc23
R-car-2.0.19-3 | fc23
R-GeneR-2.24.0-11 | fc23
R-TH-data-1.0.3-3 | fc23
rubygem-bunny-0.7.9-7 | fc23
rubygem-hipchat-1.4.0-2 | fc23
rubygem-net-ssh-multi-1.2.0-4 | fc23
rubygem-openstack-quantum-client-0.1.5-9 | fc23
rubygem-pathname2-1.7.3-3 | fc23
rubygem-puppet-lint-1.1.0-2 | fc23
rubygem-sanitize-2.1.0-5 | fc23
rubygem-virtus-1.0.5-1 | fc23
svnkit-1.8.5-3 | fc23
synaptic-0.57.2-38 | fc23
taskjuggler-2.4.3-22 | fc23
tboot-1.8.2-3 | fc23
teal-1_40b-14 | fc23
activemq-cpp-3.8.4-4 | fc24
apanov-edrip-fonts-20100430-11 | fc24
arm-none-eabi-gdb-7.6.2-4 | fc24
avr-gdb-7.1-13 | fc24
ayttm-0.6.3-14 | fc24
blitz-0.10-10 | fc24
blobby-1.0-11.svn1541 | fc24
blobwars-1.19-13 | fc24
buildbot-0.8.12-2 | fc24
bwm-ng-0.6.1-2 | fc24
claws-mail-plugins-3.13.1-1 | fc24
clojure-1.7.0-1 | fc24
conserver-8.2.1-3 | fc24
dcmtk-3.6.1-4 | fc24
deo-0.5.1-2 | fc24
dumbster-1.6-20 | fc24
edb-0.9.18-17 | fc24
elasticsearch-1.7.1-3 | fc24
emacs-auctex-11.89-3 | fc24
emacs-evil-1.2.9-1 | fc24
emacs-php-mode-1.17.0-6 | fc24
ExchangeIR-0.0.8.2-4 | fc24
fes-0.1-9 | fc24
festival-1.96-32 | fc24
font-manager-0.7.2-4 | fc24
forbidden-apis-1.7-3 | fc24

[Bug 1505088] perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.12 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505088



--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok  ---
Thank You, Jitka.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505088] perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.12 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505088

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED
 CC||jples...@redhat.com
   Fixed In Version||perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.12
   ||-1.fc28
   Assignee|mhron...@redhat.com |jples...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: missing protobuf-c-devel in ppc64

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

On Monday, 23 October 2017 at 12:05, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:49:29 +0200
> Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos  wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >  It seems that the ppc64 buildroot of epel does not contain
> > protobuf-c- devel. Error during installation (from [0]) is:
> > Error: No Package found for protobuf-c-devel
> > 
> > That issue does not exist in the ppc64le, nor any other architecture.
> > Is there an issue with the ppc64 architecture?
> 
> most likely protobuf-c is a dependency of a product that's not
> made available on ppc64, thus neither protobuf-c is available

And you might need to submit (or ask Fedora maintainer to submit)
protobuf as a limited-arch package for ppc64:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging#Limited_Arch_Packages

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora   https://getfedora.org  |  RPMFusion   http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Self introduction: Aivar Annamaa

[Benson Muite]

Hi Aivar,

Welcome to Fedora.  Python special interest group may have helpful 
suggestions as well:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Python
They have a separate mailing list.

Regards,
Benson

On 10/20/2017 02:53 PM, Aivar Annamaa wrote:

Hi!

I am computer science teaching assistant in University of Tartu, 
Estonia. I'm on my way to get a PhD in CS education. Over the last few 
years I've developed a nice tool for teaching (Python) programming to 
the beginners -- Thonny IDE (http://thonny.org). It's main strength is 
its program run-time visualization capabilities (see the homepage for 
screenshots and video).


Thonny is growing in popularity (I'm proud that Raspberry Pi education 
team has chosen it to be Raspberry's default Python IDE), but it's not 
in the Fedora repository yet.


I've prepared the package (SPEC 
, SRPM 
) 
and I was able to build 
 
it for Fedora 27, Rawhide and Mageia 6. I haven't found the sponsor yet 
(review request ).


I'm willing to take care of Thonny in Fedora for long time.

I've written (or contributed to) some other open-source tools, mostly in 
Python (eg. virtual robot library for teaching programming 
) but also in Java (statical 
checker for SQL strings in Java code ).


best regards,
Aivar



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505141] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000082 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505141



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Test2-Suite-0.82-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-90fc5e1d14

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505141] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000082 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505141

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Test2-Suite-0.82-1
   ||.fc28
   Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com   |jples...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505199] perl-PPIx-EditorTools-0.20 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505199

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-PPIx-EditorTools-0.20-
   ||1.fc28
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2017-10-23 07:23:39



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505135] perl-PAR-Packer-1.040 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505135

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-PAR-Packer-1.040-1.fc2
   ||8



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505117] perl-App-Cme-1.024 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505117



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-App-Cme-1.024-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-422cd3ce18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505117] perl-App-Cme-1.024 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505117

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-App-Cme-1.024-1.fc28



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505126] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171020 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505126



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171020-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-7d34256339

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505126] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171020 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505126

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Module-CoreList-5.2017
   ||1020-1.fc28
   Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com   |jples...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505087] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.40 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505087



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.40-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-267e79bae2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505087] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.40 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505087

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.4
   ||0-1.fc28



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org