f28-ppc64le chroots finally working in COPR

[Michal Novotny]

Hello,

the fedora-28-ppc64le chroot was no working up until now due to lack of
compose. This was resolved however in issue.
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7357

clime
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 28 Bodhi Activation Point

[Mohan Boddu]

Hi all,

Today’s an important day on the Fedora 28 schedule[1], with several
significant cut-offs. First of all today is the Bodhi activation point [2].
That means that from now all Fedora 28 packages must be submitted to
updates-testing and pass the relevant requirements[3] before they will be
marked as ‘stable’ and moved to the fedora repository.

Today is also the Software String freeze[4], which means that strings
marked for translation in Fedora-translated projects should not now be
changed for Fedora 28.

Finally, today is the ‘completion deadline’ Change Checkpoint[5], meaning
that Fedora 28 Changes must now be ‘feature complete or close enough to
completion that a majority of its functionality can be tested’.

Regards
Release Engineering.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/28/Schedule
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Bodhi_enabling
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Branched_release
[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/StringFreezePolicy
[5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Policy
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

f28-ppc64le chroots finally working in COPR

[Michal Novotny]

Hello,

the fedora-28-ppc64le chroot was no working up until now due to lack of
compose. This was resolved however in issue.
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7357

clime
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Please test f28-backgrounds package

[Luya Tshimbalanga]

f28-backgrounds just got packaged and ready for beta release. Please
test and give positive if everything works as intended.

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/f28-backgrounds-28.1.0-1.fc28%20desktop-backgrounds-28.0.0-1.fc28

Thanks in advance

-- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.coolest-storm.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1543181] Please provide a package for EPEL7

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543181



--- Comment #5 from Emmanuel Seyman  ---
I'm waiting for the two deps to hit stable (which should be soon).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: branched compose never end

[Kevin Fenzi]

On 03/05/2018 05:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 00:49 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>> Hi,
>> ATM, Fedora-28-20180303.n.1 , Fedora-28-20180304.n.0 and Fedora-28-
>> 20180305.n.0 still running ,
>>
>> I found one notification in Fedora-28-20180303.n.1 [1] that may explain
>> why [2] is waiting for a commit sign for 22 hours. 
> 
> We are already on this.
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551653
> https://pagure.io/pungi/issue/860

Well, actually this case is because we didn't have f28 ostree signing
setup. The previous f28 branched compose all the ostree deliverables
failed, so it didn't need to sign them. Now in these thats fixed and it
needed to wait for them to be signed.

Patrick has set that up and both are moving forward now.

kevin





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: branched compose never end

[Adam Williamson]

On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 00:49 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> ATM, Fedora-28-20180303.n.1 , Fedora-28-20180304.n.0 and Fedora-28-
> 20180305.n.0 still running ,
> 
> I found one notification in Fedora-28-20180303.n.1 [1] that may explain
> why [2] is waiting for a commit sign for 22 hours. 

We are already on this.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551653
https://pagure.io/pungi/issue/860
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

php-facedetect license change (BSD to PHP)

[Adam Williamson]

I've just bumped php-facedetect to the latest git code on Rawhide and
F28 (to make it build against OpenCV 3.4). This comes with a license
change back from BSD to PHP. Don't think this should affect any
dependencies.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

branched compose never end

[Sérgio Basto]

Hi,
ATM, Fedora-28-20180303.n.1 , Fedora-28-20180304.n.0 and Fedora-28-
20180305.n.0 still running ,

I found one notification in Fedora-28-20180303.n.1 [1] that may explain
why [2] is waiting for a commit sign for 22 hours. 

Cheers,

[1]
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-28-20180303.
n.1/logs/global/notifications/notification-2018-03-05_02-36-29.log

[2]
2018-03-05 02:36:30.394652: Commit not signed yet, waiting
(...)
2018-03-05 23:11:20.314618: Commit not signed yet, waiting


-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551819] New: perl-Test2-Suite-0.000104 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551819

Bug ID: 1551819
   Summary: perl-Test2-Suite-0.000104 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Test2-Suite
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com



Latest upstream release: 0.000104
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.000102-1.fc29
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test2-Suite/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/9536/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Bodhi Activation Point

[Mohan Boddu]

Hi all,

Today’s an important day on the Fedora 28 schedule[1], with several
significant cut-offs. First of all today is the Bodhi activation point [2].
That means that from now all Fedora 28 packages must be submitted to
updates-testing and pass the relevant requirements[3] before they will be
marked as ‘stable’ and moved to the fedora repository.

Today is also the Software String freeze[4], which means that strings
marked for translation in Fedora-translated projects should not now be
changed for Fedora 28.

Finally, today is the ‘completion deadline’ Change Checkpoint[5], meaning
that Fedora 28 Changes must now be ‘feature complete or close enough to
completion that a majority of its functionality can be tested’.

Regards
Release Engineering.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/28/Schedule
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Bodhi_enabling
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Branched_release
[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/StringFreezePolicy
[5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Policy
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551806] New: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Authentication-0.23 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551806

Bug ID: 1551806
   Summary: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Authentication-0.23 is
available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Authentication
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: emman...@seyman.fr, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest upstream release: 0.23
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.22-2.fc28
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CGI-Application-Plugin-Authentication/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/13780/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: systemd 238 and sysusers

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 6:28 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 05:16:36PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  writes:
> >
> > ZJ> - various transfiletriggers have been ported from Mageia, for the
> > ZJ>   udev hwdb and rules, the journal catalog, sysctl.d, binfmt.d,
> > ZJ>   sysusers.d, and tmpfiles.d. This means that for many packages,
> > ZJ>   which do not need those rules to be applied immediately,
> > ZJ>   scriptlets can be totally removed.
> >
> > So, could you possibly give the packaging committee a heads up as soon
> > as possible?  Preferably like a few days ago?
> >
> > ZJ> - somewhat independently, systemd-sysusers has been beefed up so it
> > ZJ>   is possible to use it to create system users before any files are
> > ZJ>   installed on disk, but honouring admin overrides. In short, we now
> > ZJ>   recommend the following invocation to create users for an rpm
> > ZJ>   which contains files owned by those users:
> >
> > ZJ> %sysusers_create_package %{name} %SOURCEN
> >
> > But the packaging guidelines _don't_ recommend that.  And they won't
> > until someone gives us a heads up.  Please don't ask folks to change
> > their packages before you've even given the packaging committee a chance
> > to change the guidelines.
>
> Hi,
>
> I was speaking with my upstream hat on, not trying to suggest
> immediate changes to packaging in Fedora. I'm aware the guidelines
> recommend getent/useradd calls right now. There are some idea to change
> this, but my mail wasn't supposed to start that process. I hope this
> will be discussed for F29, in due time.
>
> Sorry, I should have written this like "If you were to use
> systemd-sysusers to create users for an rpm, we would recommend ...".
>
> Zbyszek



Sorry about that, Tibbs. I’ve got it on my TODO list to put together a
guidelines proposal this week. To all reading: this is *not* yet the
recommended approach and will not be until and unless FPC approves new
guidelines.

>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: systemd 238 and sysusers

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 05:16:36PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  writes:
> 
> ZJ> - various transfiletriggers have been ported from Mageia, for the
> ZJ>   udev hwdb and rules, the journal catalog, sysctl.d, binfmt.d,
> ZJ>   sysusers.d, and tmpfiles.d. This means that for many packages,
> ZJ>   which do not need those rules to be applied immediately,
> ZJ>   scriptlets can be totally removed.
> 
> So, could you possibly give the packaging committee a heads up as soon
> as possible?  Preferably like a few days ago?
> 
> ZJ> - somewhat independently, systemd-sysusers has been beefed up so it
> ZJ>   is possible to use it to create system users before any files are
> ZJ>   installed on disk, but honouring admin overrides. In short, we now
> ZJ>   recommend the following invocation to create users for an rpm
> ZJ>   which contains files owned by those users:
> 
> ZJ> %sysusers_create_package %{name} %SOURCEN
> 
> But the packaging guidelines _don't_ recommend that.  And they won't
> until someone gives us a heads up.  Please don't ask folks to change
> their packages before you've even given the packaging committee a chance
> to change the guidelines.

Hi,

I was speaking with my upstream hat on, not trying to suggest
immediate changes to packaging in Fedora. I'm aware the guidelines
recommend getent/useradd calls right now. There are some idea to change
this, but my mail wasn't supposed to start that process. I hope this
will be discussed for F29, in due time.

Sorry, I should have written this like "If you were to use
systemd-sysusers to create users for an rpm, we would recommend ...".

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: systemd 238 and sysusers

[Jason L Tibbitts III]

> "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  writes:

ZJ> - various transfiletriggers have been ported from Mageia, for the
ZJ>   udev hwdb and rules, the journal catalog, sysctl.d, binfmt.d,
ZJ>   sysusers.d, and tmpfiles.d. This means that for many packages,
ZJ>   which do not need those rules to be applied immediately,
ZJ>   scriptlets can be totally removed.

So, could you possibly give the packaging committee a heads up as soon
as possible?  Preferably like a few days ago?

ZJ> - somewhat independently, systemd-sysusers has been beefed up so it
ZJ>   is possible to use it to create system users before any files are
ZJ>   installed on disk, but honouring admin overrides. In short, we now
ZJ>   recommend the following invocation to create users for an rpm
ZJ>   which contains files owned by those users:

ZJ> %sysusers_create_package %{name} %SOURCEN

But the packaging guidelines _don't_ recommend that.  And they won't
until someone gives us a heads up.  Please don't ask folks to change
their packages before you've even given the packaging committee a chance
to change the guidelines.

 - J<
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

systemd 238 and sysusers

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

Hi,

systemd 238 has been released [1] and is building in F28 and rawhide.

This release has more bugfixes than new features, but there are some
changes that might be particularly interesting for Fedora:

- cgroups v2 is now supported much better. In particular a long-standing
  conflict between cgroups v2 and systemd-run --user --scope has
  been fixed. Please try systemd-cgtop with a recent kernel and the v2
  hierarchy to check out the improved accounting.

- various transfiletriggers have been ported from Mageia, for the udev
  hwdb and rules, the journal catalog, sysctl.d, binfmt.d, sysusers.d,
  and tmpfiles.d. This means that for many packages, which do not need
  those rules to be applied immediately, scriptlets can be totally
  removed.

- somewhat independently, systemd-sysusers has been beefed up so it is
  possible to use it to create system users before any files are
  installed on disk, but honouring admin overrides. In short, we now
  recommend the following invocation to create users for an rpm which
  contains files owned by those users:

%sysusers_create_package %{name} %SOURCEN

  where %SOURCEN is the tmpfiles.d config file which will be installed
  by package. This expands to

echo "u NAME - -" | systemd-sysusers 
--replace=/usr/lib/sysusers.d/NAME.conf - >/dev/null 2>&1 || :

  and the "u NAME - -" configuration is applied with a priority that
  /usr/lib/sysusers.d/NAME.conf normally has (so e.g.
  /etc/sysusers.d/NAME.conf will override this).

[1] https://raw.githubusercontent.com/systemd/systemd/master/NEWS

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes

[Randy Barlow]

On 03/02/2018 04:04 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Also, how would you handle obsolete forgotten stray packages that linger
> in the repo (because they've not been killed properly, or a tool bug
> resulted in their non removal)? Gating gives any such package the power
> to block all updates in more critical packages

We can probably use it as an opportunity to fix that broken stray
package. Also if we had to, we do have WaiverDB now to just waive the
test failure.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Test gate failures

[Adam Williamson]

On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 17:06 -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Randy Barlow wrote:
> 
> > On 03/03/2018 11:15 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> 
> > > * F27 Wine 3.3
> 
> > >- "The update can not be pushed: no test results found"
> 
> > >- https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fa6f017315
> 
> > > * F26 Wine 3.3
> 
> > >- "The update can not be pushed: 1 of 2 required tests not found"
> 
> > >- https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c5a0e704d6
> 
> > 
> 
> > Both of these seem to have failed rpmdeplint, which I believe indicates
> 
> > that they are missing dependencies.
> 
> 
> Coes not this rather imply that the ** test environment ** 
> needs to be well enough stocked to perform tests?

No.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Test gate failures

[R P Herrold]

On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Randy Barlow wrote:

> On 03/03/2018 11:15 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > * F27 Wine 3.3
> >    - "The update can not be pushed: no test results found"
> >    - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fa6f017315
> > * F26 Wine 3.3
> >    - "The update can not be pushed: 1 of 2 required tests not found"
> >    - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c5a0e704d6
> 
> Both of these seem to have failed rpmdeplint, which I believe indicates
> that they are missing dependencies.

Coes not this rather imply that the ** test environment ** 
needs to be well enough stocked to perform tests?  It MIGHT be 
all right to add a BR for each package, but fixing ONCE by 
stocking the test environment with a test time tool 
(/usr/bin/rpmdeplint), only, and socumenting what one may 
count on being present, seems much more straightforward

I must confess also that I don't see that a BR actually would 
persist over into the test harness environment

-- russ herrold
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity WG (once every two weeks)

[jkurik]

Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
   Modularity WG (once every two weeks) on 2018-03-06 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 
US/Eastern
   At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net

The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Working Group.

More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki 
page](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Modularity_Working_Group)

The agenda for the meeting is available at [modularity-wg-agendas 
pad](https://board.net/p/modularity-wg-agendas).



Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/5249/

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Test gate failures

[Randy Barlow]

On 03/03/2018 11:15 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> * F27 Wine 3.3
>    - "The update can not be pushed: no test results found"
>    - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fa6f017315
> * F26 Wine 3.3
>    - "The update can not be pushed: 1 of 2 required tests not found"
>    - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c5a0e704d6

Both of these seem to have failed rpmdeplint, which I believe indicates
that they are missing dependencies.

> Is there a way to refresh the tests?

Bodhi refreshes the Greenwave decision every 6 hours, and also every
time the Update is edited.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1550526] Upgrade perl-Image-ExifTool to 10.80

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550526



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Image-ExifTool-10.80-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0150540ebe

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1550526] Upgrade perl-Image-ExifTool to 10.80

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550526



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Image-ExifTool-10.80-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL
7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-97782e8897

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1550526] Upgrade perl-Image-ExifTool to 10.80

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550526



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Image-ExifTool-10.80-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL
6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-00e0248288

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1550526] Upgrade perl-Image-ExifTool to 10.80

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550526



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Image-ExifTool-10.80-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-989ad3ad8a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1543181] Please provide a package for EPEL7

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543181



--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Any chance you have a look this wek? This is the last missing package I need to
build ravada on EPEL.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: unresponsive maintainer: nss-mdns

[Adam Goode]

> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 06:45:35PM -, Adam Goode wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Lennart has the flu, so he'll probably wont' reply immediately.
> I'll ping him, but you can expect that he will want to give the
> package away.
> 

Thanks, and I hope he feels better soon.

Adam
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551481] perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.24 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551481



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.24-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d3925e6dd4

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainers - ggillies, vpodzime

[Kevin Fenzi]

Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for these package
maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive
maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in
maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
addresses in FAS).

If they're not interested in maintaining or we can't locate them in 1
week, I'll have FESCo orphan the packages so that others can take them
over.

If you have a way to contact these maintainers, please let them know
that we'd appreciate knowing what to do with their packages. Thanks!

ggillies:

rpms/rubygem-amq-protocol
rpms/rubygem-eventmachine
rpms/rubygem-em-worker
rpms/rubygem-sigdump

vpodzime:

Fedora Documentation/anaconda-addon-development-guide

kevin



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainers - xing, noriko, aortega, jcholast, mzatko

[Kevin Fenzi]

On 02/07/2018 10:27 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for these package
> maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive
> maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in
> maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
> addresses in FAS).
> 
> If they're not interested in maintaining or we can't locate them in 1
> week, I'll have FESCo orphan the packages so that others can take them
> over.
> 
> If you have a way to contact these maintainers, please let them know
> that we'd appreciate knowing what to do with their packages. Thanks!

I've heard back from one of them, but not any of the others.

So, accordingly I have orphaned the following packages:

rpms/perl-Pod-Plainer
rpms/peervpn
rpms/arm-none-eabi-gdb
rpms/rubygem-awesome_print
rpms/rubygem-colored
rpms/rubygem-slim

If you wish to become point of contact for these or any other orphaned
packages, please let this list know and file a releng ticket to reassign
the package(s).

and have also removed the bugzilla component for
rpms/qpidpy as this package no longer existed in Fedora.

kevin
--
> 
> xing:
> 
>   https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/xning
> 
>   Projects:
> 
>   https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-Plainer [product: Fedora]


...snip...
> 
> aortega:
> 
>   Projects:
> 
>   qpidpy [product: Fedora]
> 
>   qpidrb [product: Fedora]
> 
> jcholast:
> 
>   https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/jcholast
> 
>   Projects:
> 
>   peervpn [product: Fedora]
> 
> mzatko:
> 
>   https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/mzatko
> 
>   Projects:
> 
>   arandr [product: Fedora]
>   rubygem-slim [product: Fedora]
>   rubygem-awesome_print [product: Fedora]
>   rubygem-colored [product: Fedora]
>   arm-none-eabi-gdb [product: Fedora]
> 
> kevin
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: unresponsive maintainer: nss-mdns

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 06:45:35PM -, Adam Goode wrote:
> I am following the unresponsive maintainer policy:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
> 
> Bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544608
> 
> Does anyone know how to reach the maintainer?

Hi,

Lennart has the flu, so he'll probably wont' reply immediately.
I'll ping him, but you can expect that he will want to give the
package away.

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: unresponsive maintainer: nss-mdns

[chicago]

That sounds perfect! Thank you for volunteering. 

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551481] perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.24 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551481

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.24-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5eeffd1515

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 965  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168   
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
 855  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb   
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6
 826  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-35e240edd9   
thttpd-2.25b-24.el6
 437  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-e3e50897ac   
libbsd-0.8.3-2.el6
 166  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-4c76ddcc92   
libmspack-0.6-0.1.alpha.el6
  86  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-6aaee32b7e   
optipng-0.7.6-6.el6
  57  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-8c9006d462   
heimdal-7.5.0-1.el6
  52  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-752a7c9ad4   
rootsh-1.5.3-17.el6
  21  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f742513635   
jhead-3.00-9.el6
  14  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c8346d8e5   
mbedtls-2.7.0-1.el6
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-6ac908eac8   
openjpeg2-2.3.0-6.el6
  10  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-2ffe688829   
freexl-1.0.5-1.el6
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-5d12c76136   
drupal7-7.57-1.el6
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-7e91105260   
clamav-0.99.4-1.el6


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing

fedpkg-1.32-1.el6
openblas-0.2.20-5.el6

Details about builds:



 fedpkg-1.32-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-cc294452ac)
 Fedora utility for working with dist-git

Update Information:

- Add requests-tests-repo command (mvadkert) - Use PDC instead of Bodhi to get
the active release branches - #187 (mprahl) - fix broken syntax in bash
completion (tmz) - Fix Python 3 incompatible code in tests (cqi) - Better
mocking.  Return different values for each new request. (rbean) - Typofix.
(rbean) - Add docstrings. (rbean) - Automatically request module for non-
standard branches. (rbean) - Refactor: parameterize the request_repo and
request_branch functionality. (rbean) - Some additions to the gitignore file.
(rbean)




 openblas-0.2.20-5.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-aaa5937830)
 An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Update Information:

64-bit integer interfaces are now enabled, enabling calculations on large
matrices.

___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposal to increase the beta freeze to 3 weeks

[Adam Williamson]

On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 11:35 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> 
> We do freezes so that people don't suddenly make an unneeded change to
> the base content which causes a new release-blocking bug.
> 
> If we don't have freezes, we run the risk of getting to the point where
> we're almost done, there's just one more blocker to fix, andsomeone
> lands a new version of glibc that breaks everything. (Etc.)

Sorry for the thread necro, didn't notice I had a filter applied :)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 1092  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087   
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
 855  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f   
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
 437  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-04bc9dd81d   
libbsd-0.8.3-1.el7
 334  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-d241156dfe   
mod_cluster-1.3.3-10.el7
 166  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-e27758bd23   
libmspack-0.6-0.1.alpha.el7
 104  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-e64eeb6ece   
nagios-4.3.4-5.el7
  53  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-73ee944e65   
rootsh-1.5.3-17.el7
  27  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-7134fc92a1   
jhead-3.00-7.el7
  14  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-525417d3d4   
mbedtls-2.7.0-1.el7
  14  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-cee77fc9b3   
knot-resolver-2.1.0-1.el7
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b7a74678b1   
openjpeg2-2.3.0-6.el7
  12  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-50566f0a39   
uwsgi-2.0.16-1.el7
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-0296296d7c   
mingw-wavpack-5.1.0-4.el7
  10  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-9111777f91   
freexl-1.0.5-1.el7
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3e70a38ad4   
drupal7-7.57-1.el7
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-aacf1b47d6   
clamav-0.99.4-1.el7
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-815e0064e9   
tor-0.2.9.15-1.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

argbash-2.6.1-2.el7
fedpkg-1.32-1.el7
mirrormanager2-0.8.4-2.el7
openssl-pkcs11-0.4.7-4.el7
python-flask-sqlalchemy-2.3.2-1.el7
srecord-1.64-14.el7
znc-1.6.6-1.el7

Details about builds:



 argbash-2.6.1-2.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-193b444e50)
 Bash argument parsing code generator

Update Information:

Update to 2.6.1  Adds preliminary bash-completion support




 fedpkg-1.32-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-1c29125e93)
 Fedora utility for working with dist-git

Update Information:

- Add requests-tests-repo command (mvadkert) - Use PDC instead of Bodhi to get
the active release branches - #187 (mprahl) - fix broken syntax in bash
completion (tmz) - Fix Python 3 incompatible code in tests (cqi) - Better
mocking.  Return different values for each new request. (rbean) - Typofix.
(rbean) - Add docstrings. (rbean) - Automatically request module for non-
standard branches. (rbean) - Refactor: parameterize the request_repo and
request_branch functionality. (rbean) - Some additions to the gitignore file.
(rbean)




 mirrormanager2-0.8.4-2.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-a405370a32)
 Mirror management application

Update Information:

Upgrade to 0.8.4    Update to 0.8.4




 openssl-pkcs11-0.4.7-4.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-9cae9216a4)
 A PKCS#11 engine for use with OpenSSL

Update Information:

Package renamed from libp11 to openssl-pkcs11




 python-flask-sqlalchemy-2.3.2-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-80aa78a5e0)
 Adds SQLAlchemy support to Flask application

Update Information:

Latest upstream.




 srecord-1.64-14.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-33a5097bf2)
 Manipulate EPROM load files

Update Information:

Build for EPEL7.




 

Re: unresponsive maintainer: nss-mdns

[Adam Goode]

> It looks like you'll be "it" if the maintainers don't respond. Do you
> want to be a maintainer?

Yes, I can be the maintainer.

I'm currently the main upstream contributor:
https://github.com/lathiat/nss-mdns/graphs/contributors
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposal to increase the beta freeze to 3 weeks

[Adam Williamson]

On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 10:05 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 4:22 AM, Jan Kurik  wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Stephen John Smoogen  
> > wrote:
> > > On 17 November 2017 at 13:30, Randy Barlow  
> > > wrote:
> > > > Greetings fellow Fedorans!
> > > > 
> > > > During today's FESCo meeting[0], there was discussion around a proposal
> > > > to increase the freeze period from 2 weeks to 3 weeks[1]. Several
> > > > members of FESCo thought this proposal might be unpopular with Fedora
> > > > developers, so a compromise proposal was made: increase the beta freeze
> > > > to 3 weeks, but keep the stable freeze at 2 weeks[2].
> > > > 
> > > > We would like to ask for feedback from the Fedora community about this
> > > > proposal. Feel free to reply here, or comment on the FESCo ticket.
> > > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts!
> > > 
> > > How many of the last "long" freezes have happened because of bad
> > > software and how much has happened because other issues caused
> > > composes to actually test not to be created? We "seem" to spend a lot
> > > of the freeze working for an actual working compose before we can
> > > actually see what is going on in with the software that people want.
> > > 
> > > Would it make more sense to just have the Freeze not start until we
> > > have a bootable compose? [I realize this is a overflowing stack
> > > recursive loop if not defined adequetely define bootable but if QA
> > > can't test an install until week 2 of the freeze.. we weren't ready to
> > > freeze for packages.
> > 
> > I do not think this is the case.
> > 
> > In general there are two types of composes. We have nightly composes
> > and we have RC composes. The nightly composes are built on daily basis
> > and even these fail from time to time, we mostly have a new "bootable
> > compose" every day. The reason why we spent most of the time of a
> > Freeze period waiting for an RC compose is a condition that an RC
> > compose must not contain any known blocker. So, it is not matter of
> > the compose it self, it is a matter of fixing know blockers before QA
> > can ask for and RC compose. Also the reason why a Freeze period is
> > prolonged is typically an unresolved blocker(s). From outside it might
> > look like an issue with an RC compose it self, but in fact the RC
> > compose is typically blocked by a blocker bug(s).
> > 
> > Note: what I wrote above does not apply to Fedora Modular Server,
> > which is a special case due to extensive changes in development
> > infrastructure.
> > 
> 
> So then my question is, *why* do we do freezes at all then? Can't we
> just cherry-pick updates into compose trees independently?

We do freezes so that people don't suddenly make an unneeded change to
the base content which causes a new release-blocking bug.

If we don't have freezes, we run the risk of getting to the point where
we're almost done, there's just one more blocker to fix, andsomeone
lands a new version of glibc that breaks everything. (Etc.)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: unresponsive maintainer: nss-mdns

[chicago]

It looks like you'll be "it" if the maintainers don't respond. Do you want to 
be a maintainer? 

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

unresponsive maintainer: nss-mdns

[Adam Goode]

I am following the unresponsive maintainer policy:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers

Bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544608

Does anyone know how to reach the maintainer?


Thanks,

Adam
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Test-Announce] 2018-03-05 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

[Adam Williamson]

On Sat, 2018-03-03 at 19:32 +, Silvia Sánchez wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I've been talking with other people and apparently is quite common to
> have issues with HP laptops.  F25 works but F27 doesn't, with an
> extreme case of not booting at all.
> In my case I suspect of Wayland, provided other desktops/spins did
> work. But maybe I'm wrong or it's not the only one in fault. I can
> provide hardware details in the meeting.

Hi Silvia! As we discussed in the meeting, I think the best thing to do
is check with a recent compose - once one finally completes - and see
if this is still a problem, as there were some changes to Workstation
in the last few days which may have fixed it. If it's still a problem,
please file a bug against mutter and propose it as a Beta blocker.
Thanks a lot!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Call for testing of xserver 1.20 release candidates

[Adam Jackson]

On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 18:03 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 03/05/2018 05:48 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > Short version:
> > 
> > $ sudo dnf copr enable ajax/upstream
> > $ sudo dnf upgrade
> > 
> > Long version:
> > 
> > I've set up a copr containing a rebuild of the X server and drivers for
> > the upstream 1.20 release candidates. Unfortunately the upstream and
> > Fedora schedules didn't line up as well as I'd have liked, so I'm not
> > going to try to land this for F28 GA. But I would _very_ much like to 
> > push this as an update, and would appreciate any and all testing and
> > feedback.
> 
> I would say the opposite: land this today so that it can get in F28 Beta
> (tomorrow starts package freeze for the beta release), and don't do a
> post release update that changes the drivers ABI.

Much as I would like to, the change process does exist, and says it's
far too late for that for F28 gold.

- ajax
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Call for testing of xserver 1.20 release candidates

[William Moreno]

>
>
> I would say the opposite: land this today so that it can get in F28 Beta
> (tomorrow starts package freeze for the beta release), and don't do a
> post release update that changes the drivers ABI.
>
>
This should have happened via the System Wide Changes proces, isn´t? At
less a Freeze exception should be requested, even with WorkStation using
wayland by default the Xserver is critical for the others spins, in the
works case can land in F29.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Call for testing of xserver 1.20 release candidates

[Kalev Lember]

On 03/05/2018 05:48 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Short version:
> 
> $ sudo dnf copr enable ajax/upstream
> $ sudo dnf upgrade
> 
> Long version:
> 
> I've set up a copr containing a rebuild of the X server and drivers for
> the upstream 1.20 release candidates. Unfortunately the upstream and
> Fedora schedules didn't line up as well as I'd have liked, so I'm not
> going to try to land this for F28 GA. But I would _very_ much like to 
> push this as an update, and would appreciate any and all testing and
> feedback.

I would say the opposite: land this today so that it can get in F28 Beta
(tomorrow starts package freeze for the beta release), and don't do a
post release update that changes the drivers ABI.

This way, you get all the Fedora QA testing that's done as part of the
release with the new xserver code, and avoid a disruptive post release
update that invalidates all the QA testing + creates a problematic ABI
change.

-- 
Kalev
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: -z defs linker flag activated in Fedora rawhide

[Sérgio Basto]

On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 16:24 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> ### Disable strict symbol checks in the link editor (ld)
> 
> By default, the link editor will refuse to link shared objects which
> contain undefined symbols.  In some cases (such as when a DSO is
> loaded as a plugin and is expected to bind to symbols in the main
> executable), undefined symbols are expected.  In this case, you can
> add
> 
>  %undefine _strict_symbol_defs_build
> 
> to the RPM spec file to disable these strict checks.  Alternatively,
> you can pass `-z undefs` to ld (written as `-Wl,-z,undefs` on the gcc
> command line).  The latter needs binutils 2.29.1-12.fc28 or later.
> 
> 
> This is also part of the build flags documentation at:
> 
>  uildflags.md>

Hello, 
IMHO, also in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS2291 or
should link to  https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/bl
ob/master/f/buildflags.md or should mention that we may use: 
%undefine _strict_symbol_defs_build

Thanks,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Call for testing of xserver 1.20 release candidates

[Adam Jackson]

Short version:

$ sudo dnf copr enable ajax/upstream
$ sudo dnf upgrade

Long version:

I've set up a copr containing a rebuild of the X server and drivers for
the upstream 1.20 release candidates. Unfortunately the upstream and
Fedora schedules didn't line up as well as I'd have liked, so I'm not
going to try to land this for F28 GA. But I would _very_ much like to 
push this as an update, and would appreciate any and all testing and
feedback.

- ajax
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551656] perl-Unix-Mknod-0.04-9.fc29 FTBFS: Mknod.so: undefined symbol: minor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551656

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Unix-Mknod-0.04-10.fc2
   ||9
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-03-05 11:36:35



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551668] New: perl-Verilog-Perl-3.448-1.fc29 FTBFS: t/ 35_sigparser.t crashes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551668

Bug ID: 1551668
   Summary: perl-Verilog-Perl-3.448-1.fc29 FTBFS: t/35_sigparser.t
crashes
   Product: Fedora
   Version: 28
 Component: perl-Verilog-Perl
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: chitl...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



perl-Verilog-Perl-3.448-1.fc29 fails to build in F29 because a test fails:

t/35_sigparser.t . 
Failed 3/6 subtests 
t/36_sigmany.t ... ok
[...]
Test Summary Report
---
t/35_sigparser.t   (Wstat: 134 Tests: 3 Failed: 0)
  Non-zero wait status: 134
  Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 6 tests but ran 3.

Fedora 28 is affected too.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551284] perl-Math-PlanePath-126 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551284

Miro Hrončok  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Math-PlanePath-126-1.f
   ||c29,
   ||perl-Math-PlanePath-126-1.f
   ||c28
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2018-03-05 11:35:56



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551656] perl-Unix-Mknod-0.04-9.fc29 FTBFS: Mknod.so: undefined symbol: minor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551656

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
External Bug ID||CPAN 124687
   Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551656] New: perl-Unix-Mknod-0.04-9.fc29 FTBFS: Mknod.so: undefined symbol: minor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551656

Bug ID: 1551656
   Summary: perl-Unix-Mknod-0.04-9.fc29 FTBFS: Mknod.so: undefined
symbol: minor
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Unix-Mknod
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



perl-Unix-Mknod-0.04-9.fc29 fails to build in F29 because a test fails:

+ make test
"/usr/bin/perl" -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e 'cp_nonempty' -- Mknod.bs
blib/arch/auto/Unix/M
knod/Mknod.bs 644
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 "/usr/bin/perl" "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-MTest::Harness"
"-e" "undef 
*Test::Harness::Switches; test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
Can't load
'/home/test/fedora/perl-Unix-Mknod/Unix-Mknod-0.04/blib/arch/auto/Unix/Mknod/Mk
nod.so' for module Unix::Mknod:
/home/test/fedora/perl-Unix-Mknod/Unix-Mknod-0.04/blib/arc
h/auto/Unix/Mknod/Mknod.so: undefined symbol: minor at
/usr/lib64/perl5/DynaLoader.pm line
 193.
 at t/Unix-Mknod.t line 10.
Compilation failed in require at t/Unix-Mknod.t line 10.

It seems something has changes in glibc header files and the minor() macro is
not defined anymore. Maybe Mknod.xs should include  as
minor(3) manual page documents.

A difference between passing and failing build root is
.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

[Charalampos Stratakis]

- Original Message -
> From: "Igor Gnatenko" 
> To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:09:40 PM
> Subject: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and
> gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to
> random
> reasons and I grepped all logs for some common errors found by analyzing
> hundreds of build logs.
> 
> Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:C_and_C%2B%2B#BuildRequire
> s_and_Requies
> 
> The grep output is located here:
> https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal.txt
> 
> Some packages might be missed due to short koji outage, broken dependencies
> and
> so on, but majority of real failures is below.
> 
> If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list
> or anything else -- please let me know.
> 
> Note to packages which use CMake buildsystem. When you have project(xxx) in
> CMakeLists.txt it checks both for C and CXX compilers. So you might encounter
> packages where you have BuildRequires: gcc and it fails on CXX compiler (even
> you think you don't need it). Solution for this is to send patch to upstream
> switching to something like project(xxx C), or if problem is opposite to
> project(xxx CXX).
> 
> List of packages and respective maintainers:
> https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt
> 
> - --
> - -Igor Gnatenko
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlqJs1QACgkQaVcUvRu8
> X0xxkRAAj56QZYSxzDXiMyvM9eLdVS0Qrt9jiNa66rasIbDVciTym7WQoV2CXxM+
> ZxaOCYU8eyxOhE1rx36KITJ7SgU6ugLu2dVZlG/QR8vH3RTqJPV/GWhM/WUAgaon
> f/SPwTIMk31qvEuKwlqLgNH1rwpRH2NfWVelZChwi1zXOglMvIHakV7sSedYy2i9
> bmVvf/1ylj/NbaI6FaLUqg81UQhUulD8RYeZi1cyxSpit/4aysP7ixCb4MLizmwH
> uNUO0y//xxL0hMSShmfTlsPXowU+NpkzV+lFQ/k2X4KcCZWMabfCt69TdyTbYlj5
> ai8oFGNI94Tv6rrzR/Rirfl/eODtdaaeNqyg/MBze6hYpS2w2oezOEmdYvlpJ7Xo
> z0fN/vIus1SeeyIKWo4KYHZYRX6g2nTCUeGYJqvCIRVxS9UJsy45C/HlnIWTtedn
> Dyp9O/0aSDhY+ErPQi64+HloZrY7p+KsCzPNc9HdzLbhnfM5IUn2TmO+qHngBSlY
> zGNfpOsBmmllSuBftWDfiayh8C9sBUpGT9693iyQYXPIwjZkQSHAclDZa7naN3Oy
> NKQaqVOsDmgDDP9xVOyr/Aue3jQk/8QHraM5DgO05L6lXHwdm+rjIdbb7CU2rFF7
> Gl14+kSFP7yufRQiS6Gt96eN4ePxSuD7XjiT/9GicztDXypNeX8=
> =KRiO
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> ___
> devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 

Fixed for python-ethtool, python-peewee, python-protocols, qbittorrent

python35 seems to be a false positive as it has gcc-c++ BR's (but it may be 
redundant and only require gcc).

-- 
Regards,

Charalampos Stratakis
Software Engineer
Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551555] perl-Mail-Box-POP3-3.004 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551555

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Mail-Box-POP3-3.004-1.
   ||fc29
   ||perl-Mail-Box-POP3-3.004-1.
   ||fc28
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-03-05 07:59:55



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik pushed to perl-Mail-Box-POP3 (f28). "3.004 bump"

[notifications]

From aa524ded2471f8d694f0048187297a0fd47c2363 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Mar 05 2018 12:57:12 +
Subject: 3.004 bump


---

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index db7ac91..7fae6ea 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 /Mail-Box-POP3-3.002.tar.gz
 /Mail-Box-POP3-3.003.tar.gz
+/Mail-Box-POP3-3.004.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Mail-Box-POP3.spec b/perl-Mail-Box-POP3.spec
index 4141937..1b887e8 100644
--- a/perl-Mail-Box-POP3.spec
+++ b/perl-Mail-Box-POP3.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Mail-Box-POP3
-Version:3.003
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Version:3.004
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Handle POP3 folders as client
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-Box-POP3/
@@ -76,6 +76,9 @@ MARKOV_DEVEL=1 make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Mar 05 2018 Jitka Plesnikova  - 3.004-1
+- 3.004 bump
+
 * Thu Feb 08 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
3.003-3
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index ab1e191..e569b6b 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-SHA512 (Mail-Box-POP3-3.003.tar.gz) = 
be63f85abbf78e1497eb6d6d3f87e80a3fd6d58fa6469f8732435cc740f72c2ffc6da8f5d98907e2dd4b7d0412c15f94abb994fc9274701ee050f4a3e1f50397
+SHA512 (Mail-Box-POP3-3.004.tar.gz) = 
dd3c3172cc3e589df448d92c2beb150017312f571bc2a11b64e8d7326eb2d0e685412e03ed66106d7c8be920d4653d2dc96c09809a9efd075a5e18a02660b8ce



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mail-Box-POP3/c/aa524ded2471f8d694f0048187297a0fd47c2363?branch=f28
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik pushed to perl-Mail-Box-POP3 (master). "3.004 bump"

[notifications]

From aa524ded2471f8d694f0048187297a0fd47c2363 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Mar 05 2018 12:57:12 +
Subject: 3.004 bump


---

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index db7ac91..7fae6ea 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 /Mail-Box-POP3-3.002.tar.gz
 /Mail-Box-POP3-3.003.tar.gz
+/Mail-Box-POP3-3.004.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Mail-Box-POP3.spec b/perl-Mail-Box-POP3.spec
index 4141937..1b887e8 100644
--- a/perl-Mail-Box-POP3.spec
+++ b/perl-Mail-Box-POP3.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Mail-Box-POP3
-Version:3.003
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Version:3.004
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Handle POP3 folders as client
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-Box-POP3/
@@ -76,6 +76,9 @@ MARKOV_DEVEL=1 make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Mar 05 2018 Jitka Plesnikova  - 3.004-1
+- 3.004 bump
+
 * Thu Feb 08 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
3.003-3
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index ab1e191..e569b6b 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-SHA512 (Mail-Box-POP3-3.003.tar.gz) = 
be63f85abbf78e1497eb6d6d3f87e80a3fd6d58fa6469f8732435cc740f72c2ffc6da8f5d98907e2dd4b7d0412c15f94abb994fc9274701ee050f4a3e1f50397
+SHA512 (Mail-Box-POP3-3.004.tar.gz) = 
dd3c3172cc3e589df448d92c2beb150017312f571bc2a11b64e8d7326eb2d0e685412e03ed66106d7c8be920d4653d2dc96c09809a9efd075a5e18a02660b8ce



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mail-Box-POP3/c/aa524ded2471f8d694f0048187297a0fd47c2363?branch=master
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Compile Fedora with auto-vectorization

[Florian Weimer]

On 03/05/2018 12:58 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:

On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 12:07:40PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:

Should we start compiling Fedora with auto-vectorization, either
using -O3 or -O2 -ftree-loop-vectorize?


What's the performance impact?


You mean, on build time?  Difficult to tell.  Simple things like Lua do 
not show build time change with -O3.


We didn't observe a substantial reduction in overall build time when we 
switched Fedora glibc from -O3 to -O2 because build time is mostly 
dominated by testing anyway (and discounting testing, a lot of time is 
spent in make).


For run-time impact, the performance changes you'd observe depend on 
whether you pick a benchmark which happens to be vectorized or not.



What are the risks?


The usual.  Different compiler bugs.  Additional warnings (both true 
positives and false positives) which break -Werror builds.


Furthermore, -O3 slightly changes ABI because it enables 
-finline-functions, which can break symbol interposition.  That's why 
-O2 -ftree-loop-vectorize -ftree-slp-vectorize might be the better 
choice, perhaps with other bits from -O3.


Thanks,
Florian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551554] perl-Mail-Box-IMAP4-3.003 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551554

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Mail-Box-IMAP4-3.003-1
   ||.fc29
   ||perl-Mail-Box-IMAP4-3.003-1
   ||.fc28
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-03-05 07:48:36



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551555] New: perl-Mail-Box-POP3-3.004 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551555

Bug ID: 1551555
   Summary: perl-Mail-Box-POP3-3.004 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Mail-Box-POP3
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest upstream release: 3.004
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.003-3.fc28
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-Box-POP3/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/13813/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551554] New: perl-Mail-Box-IMAP4-3.003 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551554

Bug ID: 1551554
   Summary: perl-Mail-Box-IMAP4-3.003 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Mail-Box-IMAP4
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest upstream release: 3.003
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.002-3.fc28
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-Box-IMAP4/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/13812/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551548] New: perl-Email-Address-1.909 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551548

Bug ID: 1551548
   Summary: perl-Email-Address-1.909 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Email-Address
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jose.p.oliveira@gmail.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
rob.my...@gtri.gatech.edu, tcall...@redhat.com



Latest upstream release: 1.909
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.908-7.fc28
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Email-Address/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2848/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Compile Fedora with auto-vectorization

[Matthew Miller]

On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 12:07:40PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Should we start compiling Fedora with auto-vectorization, either
> using -O3 or -O2 -ftree-loop-vectorize?

What's the performance impact? What are the risks?

-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

perl-Test-PostgreSQL license change

[Petr Pisar]

I missed a license change in perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.06 (2015 year). The
old license was "Artistic 2.0 and (GPL+ or Artistic)", the new one is
"Artistic 2.0". An updated package heads to all Fedoras that will fix
it.

-- Petr
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551481] perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.24 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551481



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.24-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5eeffd1515

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551480] perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod-0.100004 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551480

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod-
   ||0.14-1.fc28
   ||perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod-
   ||0.14-1.fc29
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-03-05 06:43:00



--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth  ---
F-28: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25498621
F-29: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25498386

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551481] perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.24 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551481

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.24-1
   ||.fc29



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
An enhancement release suitable for all Fedoras.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Patching JSON tag without hardcoding library path (package firefox-pkcs11-loader)

[Florian Weimer]

On 03/05/2018 11:43 AM, Germano Massullo wrote:

Il 05/03/2018 08:25, Florian Weimer ha scritto:

On 03/04/2018 03:02 PM, Germano Massullo wrote:

This tag is wrong and for example on x86_64 CPU architecture systems, it
must be
"path": "/usr/lib64/pkcs11/onepin-opensc-pkcs11.so"

How could I patch this file without having to hardcode the /usr/lib64
path?


I'm not entirely sure what you mean, but if you install the library in
/usr/lib or /usr/lib64 (say /usr/lib64/onepin-opensc-pkcs11.so), you
can dlopen it using just its soname (onepin-opensc-pkcs11.so).


dlopen cannot be applied to my case


How is the library loaded on a non-standard path, then?

Thanks,
Florian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Appstream metadata compose failures

[Richard Hughes]

On 4 March 2018 at 12:25, Michael Schwendt  wrote:
> This new opt-in style has never been a good idea. The software features
> an "All" button, which doesn't show all packages, which is misleading.

It's not misleading; gnome-software is an application installed, not a
package installer. To anyone that says we should just show all
installed packages I just say "texlive".

> And then there's category "Communication & News", and an Email client is
> stored within the "Chat" subcategory. Ouch.

I'm not sure what "ouch" means in this context. If you file a bug we
can discuss the proper category for this specific application, but I
don't think adding snide remarks is going to achieve anything.

Richard.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Compile Fedora with auto-vectorization

[Florian Weimer]

Should we start compiling Fedora with auto-vectorization, either using 
-O3 or -O2 -ftree-loop-vectorize?


Downstream experimented with that for POWER 7 (the ppc64p7 packages). 
But if auto-vectorization is beneficial on POWER, it likely helps on 
other CPUs as well, given that SIMD support is quite common nowadays.


I really want to avoid a package-specific flag because I don't think 
discussions about per-package build policies are a good use of our time, 
and dependency changes invalidate previous decisions based on package 
use all the time.  (We saw a lot of that when we still had 
package-specific hardening flags.)


We currently have the RPM macro _performance_build for that: It's used 
in some Fedora spec files, but the redhat-rpm-config support have never 
be contributed to Fedora.  If we enable auto-vectorization globally, 
those packages could remove the _performance_build setting, a minor cleanup.


Thanks,
Florian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1550520] Upgrade perl-Crypt-SMIME to 0.25

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550520

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Crypt-SMIME-0.25-1.fc2
   ||9
   ||perl-Crypt-SMIME-0.25-1.fc2
   ||8
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
   Assignee|steve.tray...@cern.ch   |jples...@redhat.com
Last Closed||2018-03-05 06:08:08



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Patching JSON tag without hardcoding library path (package firefox-pkcs11-loader)

[Germano Massullo]

Il 05/03/2018 08:25, Florian Weimer ha scritto:
> On 03/04/2018 03:02 PM, Germano Massullo wrote:
>> This tag is wrong and for example on x86_64 CPU architecture systems, it
>> must be
>> "path": "/usr/lib64/pkcs11/onepin-opensc-pkcs11.so"
>>
>> How could I patch this file without having to hardcode the /usr/lib64
>> path?
>
> I'm not entirely sure what you mean, but if you install the library in
> /usr/lib or /usr/lib64 (say /usr/lib64/onepin-opensc-pkcs11.so), you
> can dlopen it using just its soname (onepin-opensc-pkcs11.so).
>
dlopen cannot be applied to my case
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Appstream metadata compose failures

[Kalev Lember]

On 03/05/2018 10:25 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> AppData packaging guidelines [1] requires every package to run
> "appstream-util validate-relax". Does this check fail when the icon has
> not valid size?

No, because the icon comes from the .desktop file and 'appstream-util
validate ... appdata.xml' only works on appdata.xml files. To have a
chance of checking the icon sizes we'd need to replace it with
'appstream-util check-root' which then checks the .desktop file and
.appdata.xml and possibly icon files as well (not entirely sure it does
icon file checks right now, but at least it's possible by design then).

> Of course moving this into BRP script would be probably better ...

Agreed.

-- 
Kalev
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Release fedpkg-1.32

[Chenxiong Qi]

Hi all,

A new version fedpkg-1.32 is released.

Changelog

- Add requests-tests-repo command (mvadkert)
- Use PDC instead of Bodhi to get the active release branches - #187 (mprahl)
- fix broken syntax in bash completion (tmz)
- Fix Python 3 incompatible code in tests (cqi)
- Better mocking. Return different values for each new request. (rbean)
- Typofix. (rbean)
- Add docstrings. (rbean)
- Automatically request module for non-standard branches. (rbean)
- Refactor: parameterize the request_repo and request_branch
functionality. (rbean)
- Some additions to the gitignore file. (rbean)


Updates: 
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?builds=fedpkg-1.32-1.fc27=fedpkg-1.32-1.fc26=fedpkg-1.32-1.el6=fedpkg-1.32-1.el7

-- 
Regards,
Chenxiong Qi
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551174] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000102 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551174

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-Test2-Suite-0.000102-1 |perl-Test2-Suite-0.000102-1
   |.fc29   |.fc28
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2018-03-05 05:23:55



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1548600] perl-DBIx-RunSQL-0.17 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548600

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||jples...@redhat.com
   Fixed In Version||perl-DBIx-RunSQL-0.17-1.fc2
   ||9
   ||perl-DBIx-RunSQL-0.17-1.fc2
   ||8
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
   Assignee|de...@fateyev.com   |jples...@redhat.com
Last Closed||2018-03-05 05:17:02



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551174] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000102 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551174

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Test2-Suite-0.000102-1
   ||.fc29



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
An enhancement release suitable for Fedora ≥ 28.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [RFC] Packages which are not installable (obsoleted by other pacakges)

[Mat Booth]

On 1 March 2018 at 16:46, Igor Gnatenko 
wrote:

> can't install jackson-dataformat-cbor-javadoc-2.7.6-3.fc27.noarch:
>   package is obsoleted by jackson-dataformats-binary-javadoc-2.9.4-
> 3.fc28.noarch
> can't install jackson-dataformat-smile-javadoc-2.7.6-3.fc27.noarch:
>   package is obsoleted by jackson-dataformats-binary-javadoc-2.9.4-
> 3.fc28.noarch
> can't install jackson-dataformat-csv-javadoc-2.7.6-3.fc27.noarch:
>   package is obsoleted by jackson-dataformats-text-javadoc-2.9.4-
> 3.fc28.noarch
> can't install jackson-dataformat-yaml-javadoc-2.7.6-3.fc27.noarch:
>   package is obsoleted by jackson-dataformats-text-javadoc-2.9.4-
> 3.fc28.noarch
> can't install jackson-module-jaxb-annotations-javadoc-2.7.6-
> 3.fc27.noarch:
>   package is obsoleted by jackson-modules-base-javadoc-2.9.4-
> 2.fc28.noarch
>
>
These individual jackson packages were merged upstream into fewer repos
(and correspondingly fewer source RPMs in Fedora)

jackson-dataformat-{cbor,smile,csv,yaml} and jackson-module-jaxb-annotations
should all be retired.

-- 
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551481] New: perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.24 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551481

Bug ID: 1551481
   Summary: perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.24 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Test-PostgreSQL
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com



Latest upstream release: 1.24
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.23-4.fc28
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-PostgreSQL/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/5748/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Appstream metadata compose failures

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 2.3.2018 v 16:13 Kalev Lember napsal(a):
> On 03/02/2018 03:59 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> El vie, 02-03-2018 a las 11:28 +0100, Kalev Lember escribió:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> hughsie just did a new appstream-data compose for F29 and I noticed
>>> there's quite a large number of packages failing in the logs:
>>>
>>> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/screenshots/f29/failed.html
>>>
>>> Would be awesome if maintainers could have a look and see if they can
>>> make their packages pass!
>>>
>> We were supposed to make builds fail if the appstream metadata failed,
>> why has that not been done?
> Sorry, I dropped the ball on this. I believe we need a brp script for
> rpmbuild that runs:
>
>   DESTDIR=%{buildroot} appstream-util check-root
>
> and errors out if it fails.
>
>

AppData packaging guidelines [1] requires every package to run
"appstream-util validate-relax". Does this check fail when the icon has
not valid size?

Of course moving this into BRP script would be probably better ...

Vít



[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AppData#app-data-validate%20usage
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551480] New: perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod-0.100004 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551480

Bug ID: 1551480
   Summary: perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod-0.14 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: iarn...@gmail.com, p...@city-fan.org,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest upstream release: 0.14
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.13-9.fc28
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Pod-Coverage-TrustPod/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/16967/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2018-03-02)

[Vít Ondruch]

Zbyszek,

Next time, could you please include the meeting minutes in the email
body. It would provide more information and save me some clicks.

Thx


Vít


Dne 2.3.2018 v 18:06 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> Minutes: 
> https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-03-02/fesco.2018-03-02-15.00.html
> Minutes (text): 
> https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-03-02/fesco.2018-03-02-15.00.txt
> Log: 
> https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-03-02/fesco.2018-03-02-15.00.log.html
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551282] perl-App-cpm-0.962 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551282

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-App-cpm-0.962-1.fc29
   ||perl-App-cpm-0.962-1.fc28
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-03-05 03:23:54



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org