Re: Minimum fonts required for Fedora en_US

[Jens-Ulrik Petersen]

On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:22 PM Danishka Navin  wrote:

> What are the minimum fonts required for Fedora 28/29 with en_US locale?
>

Danishka, can you give more context for your question?

Over 450 fonts available in the fonts group.
>

The @fonts group only installs 36 fonts by default. ;) :)

Are you asking what default installed fonts can safely be removed for
English only (Latin script) usage??
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 200  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6c663378c   
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el6
  26  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-61fe7c6e70   
nagios-4.4.2-3.el6
  12  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b7556983e8   
tomcat-7.0.92-1.el6
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-a0ddb153b8   
game-music-emu-0.6.2-1.el6
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-d7155a4675   
wordpress-5.0.2-1.el6


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing

php-smbclient-1.0.0-1.el6

Details about builds:



 php-smbclient-1.0.0-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-51e55584f8)
 PHP wrapper for libsmbclient

Update Information:

**Version 1.0.0**  * Support for PHP 7.3 added, duplicate symbol and Travis
setup fixes.

ChangeLog:

* Wed Dec 26 2018 Remi Collet  - 1.0.0-1
- update to 1.0.0


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1470542] PAR::Packer requires the same perl version it was built against

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470542



--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-PAR-Packer-1.047-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-be97e1e1f1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainer

[Robert Mayr]

Il giorno mer 26 dic 2018 alle ore 22:44 Gwyn Ciesla 
ha scritto:

> I can take torbrowser-launcher.
>
> fas: limb
>
> -Gwyn
> On 12/26/18 2:53 PM, Luis Enrique Bazán De León wrote:
>


There you go, it's yours. Just for the record, this package needs an
immediate update to the latest release.
Thank you.
Best regards.
Robert
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainer

[Robert Mayr]

Il giorno mer 26 dic 2018, 21:55 Luis Enrique Bazán De León <
bazanlui...@gmail.com> ha scritto:

> Hi Robert --
>
> I can take this:
> python-parsley
> python-txsocksx
>
> fas: lbazan
>
> Cheers,
>
>
Ok, done, you have them. I also dropped myself.
Cheers.
Robert
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainer

[Gwyn Ciesla]

I can take torbrowser-launcher.

fas: limb

-Gwyn

On 12/26/18 2:53 PM, Luis Enrique Bazán De León wrote:
> Hi Robert --
>
> I can take this:  
> python-parsley
> python-txsocksx
>
> fas: lbazan
>
> Cheers,
>
> El mié., 26 dic. 2018 a las 15:44, Robert Mayr
> (mailto:robyd...@fedoraproject.org>>)
> escribió:
>
> Hi all,
> I had to take a break from Fedora for the last months and I'm
> slowly restarting with some contributions, but I need to limit my
> activity to a few things.
> That's the reason why I want to give up packaging and to hand over
> my few packages to someone else who is able to keep them up to
> date better than me.
> Some of them also have co-maintainers, my short list is here:
>
> * autotrash
> * python-parsley
> * python-txsocksx
> * torbrowser-launcher
> * wifi-radar
>
> For others I am just admin or committer, so I guess I can just
> unwatch them.
> Let me know if anyone wants them.
>
> Kind regards.
>
> -- 
> Robert Mayr
> (robyduck)
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
>
> -- 
> Luis Enrique Bazán De León
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

-- 
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers

in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainer

[Luis Enrique Bazán De León]

Hi Robert --

I can take this:
python-parsley
python-txsocksx

fas: lbazan

Cheers,

El mié., 26 dic. 2018 a las 15:44, Robert Mayr ()
escribió:

> Hi all,
> I had to take a break from Fedora for the last months and I'm slowly
> restarting with some contributions, but I need to limit my activity to a
> few things.
> That's the reason why I want to give up packaging and to hand over my few
> packages to someone else who is able to keep them up to date better than me.
> Some of them also have co-maintainers, my short list is here:
>
> * autotrash
> * python-parsley
> * python-txsocksx
> * torbrowser-launcher
> * wifi-radar
>
> For others I am just admin or committer, so I guess I can just unwatch
> them.
> Let me know if anyone wants them.
>
> Kind regards.
>
> --
> Robert Mayr
> (robyduck)
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>


-- 
Luis Enrique Bazán De León
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainer

[Robert Mayr]

Hi all,
I had to take a break from Fedora for the last months and I'm slowly
restarting with some contributions, but I need to limit my activity to a
few things.
That's the reason why I want to give up packaging and to hand over my few
packages to someone else who is able to keep them up to date better than me.
Some of them also have co-maintainers, my short list is here:

* autotrash
* python-parsley
* python-txsocksx
* torbrowser-launcher
* wifi-radar

For others I am just admin or committer, so I guess I can just unwatch them.
Let me know if anyone wants them.

Kind regards.

-- 
Robert Mayr
(robyduck)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1661697] java-openjdk have wrong description

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661697

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed||2018-12-26 20:25:26



--- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman  ---
The fedora components in Bugzilla are managed by the Fedora infrastructure
team, you will need to open a ticket with them to have it changed.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1470542] PAR::Packer requires the same perl version it was built against

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470542



--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-PAR-Packer-1.047-2.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-be97e1e1f1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Minimum fonts required for Fedora en_US

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le 2018-12-25 15:21, Danishka Navin a écrit :

Hi,

What are the minimum fonts required for Fedora 28/29 with en_US
locale?

Over 450 fonts available in the fonts grouo


Minimal font set is a hugely subjective question that depends on whether 
you care about missing glyphs on internet pages or not, if you feel 
emoticons are a must have or useless frills, if you just want to display 
text in app windows, or compose and print documents, if you want 
math/tech/symbols, if you want coding/monospace glyphs, if you want a 
wide selection of font faces or just bold/italic, if you want windows 
compatibility or not and so on.


That's why the default Fedora font set is so big. If you try to cut it 
down, you'll also sacrifice some usages.


You can try to install just the dejavu set (good all-purpose european 
set), or just cantarell (if you only want to do a few app screenshots 
and do not care about coverage), but it will almost certainly be 
unsatisfactory in some cases.


--
Nicolas Mailhot
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: WHINE: Can we please stop breaking firewalld with fail2ban?

[Richard Shaw]

Comment added to BZ which was supposed to be "fixed"...

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533760

For some reason fail2ban is not creating the ipset set... I ran fail2ban
manually with DEBUG log level and I can see where it sets everything up,
says it's OK, but I never see it call ipset to create the set so firewalld
obviously complains about not being able to find it because fail2ban DOES
create the rule (from DEBUG output:

firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter INPUT_direct 0 -p tcp -m
multiport --dports ssh -m set --match-set f2b-sshd src -j REJECT
--reject-with icmp-port-unreachable

Ok, I just tried running:

fail2ban-server -xf --loglevel 5 --logtarget STDOUT | grep ipset

And this time it DID create the ipset...

New theory... fail2ban only creates the set if it has an ip to add to it?

Spent too much time on this today.

Thanks,
Richard
Thanks,
Richard

>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: WHINE: Can we please stop breaking firewalld with fail2ban?

[Richard Shaw]

Found part of the problem:

In /etc/firewalld/direct.xml:

-p tcp -m
multiport --dports ssh -m set --match-set fail2ban-sshd src -j REJECT
--reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
---

But even after fixing that to f2b-sshd, if "ipset list" is empty I still
get the error.

Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

WHINE: Can we please stop breaking firewalld with fail2ban?

[Richard Shaw]

It seems at least once a year I look through my logs to find that fail2ban
is no longer functioning ever since the switch from iptables to firewalld...

I've spent way too much time on this but I really do try to fix things
myself and learn more about the innards of linux.

Currently I'm getting:
ERROR: '/usr/sbin/iptables-restore -w -n' failed: iptables-restore v1.8.0
(legacy): Set fail2ban-sshd doesn't exist. Error occurred at line: 2 Try
`iptables-restore -h' or 'iptables-restore --help' for more information.

Well I had switched back to iptables from ipset due to this some time ago:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533760

Which was "fixed' so I switched back to firewallcmd-ipset from
iptables-multiport but the error persists.

Here's where it gets weird. I finally figured out I'm assuming that ipset
is what's calling iptables (which is not intuitive by the error) and I see
two things:

the "-n" option is supposed to have a number of seconds after it I'm not
sure what effect just "-n" has.

It's looking for fail2ban-sshd, however...

Running "ipset list" I saw only one set, but it was called "f2b-sshd"
instead... Ah HAH!

Except when I ran it again it there was no output so the set is "gone"???

Ok, funny how working on writing all this down sometimes helps... Found
what I think it part of the problem.

Comparing firewallcmd-ipset.conf.old and firewallcmd-ipset.conf I see

[Definition][Definition]

actionstart = ipset create fail2ban- hash:ip timeout  hash:ip timeout 
  firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter  filte
---

And then later in the new conf file:

ipmset = f2b-
familyopt =
---

So the ipset create call was changed...

So how does firewalld know which set name to look for?

Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20181226.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20181225.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20181226.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images:  2
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages:   13
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:38.85 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   675.60 MiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   140.47 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Container_Base docker aarch64
Path: 
Container/aarch64/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20181226.n.0.aarch64.tar.xz

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: AtomicHost vagrant-virtualbox x86_64
Path: 
AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-Vagrant-Rawhide-20181225.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box
Image: AtomicHost vagrant-libvirt x86_64
Path: 
AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-Vagrant-Rawhide-20181225.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-libvirt.box

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: Canna-3.7p3-56.fc30
Summary: A Japanese character set input system.
RPMs:Canna Canna-devel Canna-libs
Size:38.85 MiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  Carla-2.0.0-0.5.20181225git2f3a442.fc30
Old package:  Carla-2.0.0-0.4.20181212git51f2073.fc30
Summary:  Audio plugin host
RPMs: Carla Carla-devel Carla-vst lv2-carla
Size: 52.79 MiB
Size change:  -20.39 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Dec 25 2018 Martin Gansser  - 
2.0.0-0.5.20181225git2f3a442
  - Update to 2.0.0-0.5.20181225git2f3a442
  - Rework of Carla-bswap.patch


Package:  alsa-lib-1.1.7-3.fc30
Old package:  alsa-lib-1.1.7-2.fc30
Summary:  The Advanced Linux Sound Architecture (ALSA) library
RPMs: alsa-lib alsa-lib-devel alsa-topology alsa-ucm
Size: 8.14 MiB
Size change:  -4.22 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Dec 25 2018 Hans de Goede  - 1.1.7-3
  - Fix broken chtrt5645 UCM profile, fixing mic input on chtrt5645 devices


Package:  ceres-solver-1.13.0-10.fc30
Old package:  ceres-solver-1.13.0-9.fc30
Summary:  A non-linear least squares minimizer
RPMs: ceres-solver ceres-solver-devel
Size: 4.11 MiB
Size change:  3.70 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Dec 26 2018 Sandro Mani  - 1.13.0-10
  - Rebuild (eigen3)


Package:  chafa-1.0.1-1.fc30
Old package:  chafa-0.9.0-1.fc29
Summary:  Image-to-text converter for terminal
RPMs: chafa chafa-devel chafa-doc chafa-libs chafa-static
Size: 874.27 KiB
Size change:  133.84 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Dec 25 2018 Miro Hron??ok  - 1.0.1-1
  - Update to 1.0.1 (soversion 0.0.0 -> 0.1.1)
  - Rebuilt for new ImageMagick 6.9.10 (#1623249)


Package:  eigen3-3.3.7-1.fc30
Old package:  eigen3-3.3.6-1.fc30
Summary:  A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math
RPMs: eigen3-devel eigen3-doc
Size: 22.34 MiB
Size change:  21.34 MiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Dec 25 2018 Sandro Mani  - 3.3.7-1
  - Update to 3.3.7
  - Modernize spec
  - Add doc


Package:  fuse-zip-0.5.0-1.fc30
Old package:  fuse-zip-0.4.5-3.fc29
Summary:  Filesystem to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives
RPMs: fuse-zip
Size: 335.02 KiB
Size change:  4.70 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Dec 25 2018 Vasiliy N. Glazov  - 0.5.0-1
  - Update to 0.5.0


Package:  kernel-4.20.0-1.fc30
Old package:  kernel-4.20.0-0.rc7.git1.1.fc30
Summary:  The Linux kernel
RPMs: kernel kernel-core kernel-debug kernel-debug-core 
kernel-debug-devel kernel-debug-modules kernel-debug-modules-extra kernel-devel 
kernel-lpae kernel-lpae-core kernel-lpae-devel kernel-lpae-modules 
kernel-lpae-modules-extra kernel-modules kernel-modules-extra
Added RPMs:   kernel-debug kernel-debug-core kernel-debug-devel 
kernel-debug-modules kernel-debug-modules-extra
Size: 525.69 MiB
Size change:  118.69 MiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Dec 19 2018 Peter Robinson 
  - Initial support for Raspberry Pi model 3A+
  - Stability fixes for Raspberry Pi MMC (sdcard) driver

  * Thu Dec 20 2018 Justin M. Forbes  - 
4.20.0-0.rc7.git2.1
  - Linux v4.20-rc7-202-g1d51b4b1d3f2

  * Fri Dec 21 2018 Justin M. Forbes  - 
4.20.0-0.rc7.git3.1
  - Linux v4.20-rc7-214-g9097a058d49e

  * Mon Dec 24 2018 Peter Robinson 
  - Another fix for issue affecting Raspberry Pi 3-series WiFi (rhbz 1652093)

  * Mon Dec 24 2018 Justin M. Forbes  - 4.20.0-1
  - Linux v4.20.0


Package:  libs3-4.1-0.3.20181203git111dc30.fc30
Old package:  libs3-4.1-0.2.20180821gita4d873f.fc30
Summary:  C Library and Tools for Amazon S3 Access
RPMs: libs3 libs3-devel
Size: 617.77 KiB
Size change:  34.70 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Dec 25 2018 Mattias Ellert  - 
4.1-0.3.20181203git111dc30
  - New github snapshot
  - Drop patch libs3-curl-7.62.patch (merged upstream)
  - Update License tag


Package:  mingw-eigen3-3.3.7-1.fc30
Old package:  mingw-eigen3-3.3.6-1.fc30
Summary:  MinGW lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math
RPMs: mingw32-eigen3 mingw64-eigen3
S

Fedora Rawhide-20181226.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 47 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** 
below

Failed openQA tests: 15/131 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test not failed in Rawhide-20181225.n.0):

ID: 322532  Test: x86_64 universal install_rescue_encrypted
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322532

Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20181225.n.0):

ID: 322403  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_role_deploy_domain_controller **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322403
ID: 322404  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322404
ID: 322415  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322415
ID: 322417  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322417
ID: 322425  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322425
ID: 322426  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322426
ID: 322441  Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322441
ID: 322443  Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322443
ID: 322458  Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322458
ID: 322489  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322489
ID: 322494  Test: x86_64 universal support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322494
ID: 322518  Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322518
ID: 322519  Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322519
ID: 322520  Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322520
ID: 322521  Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322521
ID: 322528  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322528
ID: 322529  Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322529

Soft failed openQA tests: 5/24 (i386), 2/131 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Rawhide-20181225.n.0):

ID: 322420  Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322420
ID: 322421  Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322421
ID: 322438  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322438
ID: 322439  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322439
ID: 322442  Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322442
ID: 322538  Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322538
ID: 322541  Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322541

Passed openQA tests: 105/131 (x86_64), 17/24 (i386)

New passes (same test not passed in Rawhide-20181225.n.0):

ID: 322445  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322445
ID: 322503  Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322503
ID: 322525  Test: x86_64 universal install_lvmthin@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322525
ID: 322530  Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_nfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322530

Skipped gating openQA tests: 4/131 (x86_64)

Old skipped gating tests (same test skipped in Rawhide-20181225.n.0):

ID: 322428  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_update_cli **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322428
ID: 322429  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_system_logging **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322429
ID: 322433  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_terminal **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322433
ID: 322434  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322434

Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 6 of 157

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default: 
System load changed from 1.44 to 1.16
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/322209#downloads
Current test data: 

Re: Minimum fonts required for Fedora en_US

[Ernestas Kulik]

On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 6:04 PM John Reiser  wrote:

> > What are the minimum fonts required for Fedora 28/29 with en_US locale?
>
> Please ask a better question.
>
> It depends on which subset of Fedora (Workstation using GNOME,
> Server, Minimal, etc.) and what data you ask it to process.
> Some servers which run Fedora never render any fonts at all.
> Or, under Fedora Workstation using GNOME desktop environment,
> then you might try to view a web page, or print a .pdf file
> to an attached non-Postscript printer, that could "require"
> an arbitrary font regardless of locale.
>
> Here's how to get one useful answer: Download Fedora Workstation Live,
> boot it from a USB flash memory drive (or in a Virtual Machine, etc.),
> login and run
>  rpm -ql $(rpm -qa  |  grep font);
> in a Terminal session.
>

 Another useful answer: GNOME uses Cantarell by default.

-- 
Ernestas Kulik
Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org