Re: F30 System-Wide Change proposal: Replace Comps Language Group With Langpacks
If I understand the proposal, I'm slightly concerned that the proposed use of Supplements: means that there will be no longer any single place where we declare "this is our recommended font for LangX, this is our recommended input method for LangX" - the history of this will be collectively over all of dist-git and hard to extract. (And it will be necessary to go to packages we stop using and remove Supplemenets) What is the reason for the use of Supplements instead of just adding Recommends: to the langpacks packages? Owen On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 2:58 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > Congratulations to the last System-Wide Change proposal of F30! > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_Comps_Language_Group_With_Langpacks > > == Summary == > Language support groups in Comps file will get replaced by langpacks > package. With this Change we want meta-packages like langpacks-ja to > also install required fonts and input-methods for the given language. > > == Owner == > * Name: [[User:petersen| Jens Petersen]] > * Email: petersen at fedoraproject dot org > * Name: [[User:pnemade| Parag Nemade]] > * Email: pnemade at fedoraproject dot org > > == Detailed Description == > This change will remove the need of having the language specific comps > groups in Fedora. > > We already have ''langpacks-*'' packages in Fedora since F24. > Currently they are installing language packages for translations, > dictionaries etc. but not fonts or input-methods. With this Change we > will try to install fonts and input-methods as well. > E.g. if you net-install Fedora in Japanese language then installation > of any base package like libreoffice-core or man-pages are installing > automatically libreoffice-langpack-ja or man-pages-ja but langpacks-ja > is not installing any Japanese font or input-method. > But now with using RPM tags or weak dependencies like Supplements, we > can get font as well as input-method packages installed as well on the > system. > There is no need of language comps groups to exist, they will be > replaced by langpacks. > > This Change is originally submitted at https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/97 > > == Benefit to Fedora == > Users can install complete language support now using langpacks only. > This will also help to remove the language support groups from the > comps file. > > == Scope == > * Proposal owners: Check all langpacks providing packages (like fonts, > input-methods) add Supplements tag in their SPEC file and build them. > We will track the progress of this Change in > [https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pnemade/langpacks/ Langpacks > Copr] project. > * Other developers: To all other developers of packages who provides > langpacks, they need to add the Supplements tag as given in this > [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Langpacks Langpacks > guideline] to each langpack subpackage. > * Release engineering: none > * Policies and guidelines: none > > == Upgrade/compatibility impact == > None. > > == How To Test == > > * [[QA:Langpacks]] > > == User Experience == > Currently users can get complete language support installed only using > "''dnf group install ''" command. After this Change gets > implemented end users can get language support installed using > meta-packages "''langpacks-"'' only > > == Dependencies == > No Other Change depend on this. > > == Contingency Plan == > * Contingency mechanism: If this change is not completed by final > development freeze then we need to target this for F31. We are just > proposing to add additional information in langpacks packages that is > Supplements tag. This should not affect individual langpacks packages > installation by dnf. > * Contingency deadline: I don't think we will need anything to revert > or apply any contingency plan here if this is not completed by beta > freeze. > * Blocks release? No > * Blocks product? N/A > > == Documentation == > * Need to add about this in the Release notes > > > -- > Ben Cotton > Fedora Program Manager > TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: AMD ROCm
Am 09.01.19 um 11:50 schrieb Germano Massullo: > AMD ROCm - Open Source Platform for HPC and Ultrascale GPU Computing[1] > is packaged by upstream only for RHEL/CentOS and Ubuntu. > Is anybody working on packaging it for Fedora? If not, is anybody > interested in setting up a team to work on it? Just wanted to mention that Tom Stellard has some open review requests for rocminfo and hcc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666836 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479 Reviewers welcome :-) Btw: I terminated perl license checker script after 8h continuous CPU usage (only 1 core though) when running "fedora-review" for hcc. Is that a known problem for bigger software? (hcc bundles llvm). Felix PS: If you want to test on F29, please rebuild hsakmt/rocm-runtime from rawhide before. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1667790] New: perl-Encode-2.99 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1667790 Bug ID: 1667790 Summary: perl-Encode-2.99 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Encode Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 2.99 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.98-6.fc29 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Encode/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/2849/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-devel] Re: [discuss] composable object types in lib389
One small correction here :
using newly created nsUserAccountRole and nsUserAccountRoles ( Will be used
only to create filter role ) , i am creating filter roles only . This is
the confusion here , we should remember filter roles are nothing but
entries with o='something'. I am not touching any user here , but i am
creating roles and these roles are covering the users automatically a
Ludwig Krispenzs said earlier. example-
role=nsUserAccountRole(topo.standalone,'cn=tuser1,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com')
user_props={'cn':'Anuj', 'nsRoleFilter':'cn=*'}
role.create(properties=user_props, basedn=SUFFIX)
In above example just created one filer role which will cover all users
having 'cn=*' in 'ou=People'. Here 'cn=tuser1,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com'
is nothing but a filter role which will cover all users having 'cn=*' in
'ou=People'.
Another example as given bellow:
dn: cn=FILTERROLEENGROLE,o=acivattr1,dc=example,dc=com
cn: FILTERROLEENGROLE
nsRoleFilter: cn=*
objectClass: top
objectClass: LDAPsubentry
objectClass: nsRoleDefinition
objectClass: nsComplexRoleDefinition
objectClass: nsFilteredRoleDefinition
This above entry is nothing but filter role entry , which will cover all
users in 'o=acivattr1' which has sub entries that begins with 'cn'. And
this is the property of filter role .
Yes , i must say that newly created nsUserAccountRole and
nsUserAccountRoles which i renamed to nsFilterAccountRole and
nsFilterAccountRoles will only cover filter role as you cant create Filter
role and other roles like Manage role all together . For my porting stuff
newly created nsFilterAccountRole and nsFilterAccountRoles is more than
enough because i need filter roles only .
Hope it clears all of your doubts.
Regards
Anuj Borah
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 4:24 AM William Brown wrote:
>
>
> > On 17 Jan 2019, at 19:40, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
> >
> >
> > Maybe I do not understand how it works because of some lib389 magic, but
> I think this is not how roles work.
> >
> > You are creating cn=tuser1 and cn=Anju and they will have the role
> objectclasses, but the benefit of roles is that you do NOT have to touch
> the useres to assign roles to them. There is a class of users and a class
> of role definitions and ONLY the change in the role definition will
> determine if a user has a role or not.
>
> I think lib389 probably isn’t helping, but Ludwig’s description here is
> correct.
>
> Maybe a good approach is to “setup” roles by hand, then once you have a
> process in mind, then you can make the lib389 parts? I generally approach
> things this way to understand them well.
>
> Would that help?
>
>
> —
> Sincerely,
>
> William Brown
> Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
> SUSE Labs
> ___
> 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-01-21 - 92% PASS
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/01/21/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.20-20190121gite08b20c.fc29.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 175 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f9d6ff695a bibutils-6.6-1.el7 ghc-hs-bibutils-6.6.0.0-1.el7 pandoc-citeproc-0.3.0.1-4.el7 159 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d condor-8.6.11-1.el7 33 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6fa6cebc3 game-music-emu-0.6.2-1.el7 30 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b43fdd19c3 vcftools-0.1.16-1.el7 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-8e5fe375cf php-horde-Horde-Form-2.0.19-1.el7 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-01cf520c0b python-django-1.11.18-1.el7 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-4d365dad3c gitolite3-3.6.11-1.el7 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-7c5121f71d golang-1.11.4-1.el7 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-a6100f3df6 nodejs-6.16.0-1.el7 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-d661b588d2 nagios-4.4.3-1.el7 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-17b3c81533 cacti-1.2.0-1.el7 cacti-spine-1.2.0-2.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing rust-1.32.0-1.el7 Details about builds: rust-1.32.0-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-17065aabb9) The Rust Programming Language Update Information: New versions of Rust and related tools -- see the release notes for [1.32.0](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2019/01/17/Rust-1.32.0.html). ChangeLog: * Thu Jan 17 2019 Josh Stone - 1.32.0-1 - Update to 1.32.0. * Mon Jan 7 2019 Josh Stone - 1.31.1-9 - Update to 1.31.1 for RLS fixes. ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1667749] New: perl-Code-TidyAll-0.73 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1667749 Bug ID: 1667749 Summary: perl-Code-TidyAll-0.73 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Code-TidyAll Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.73 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.72-1.fc30 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Code-TidyAll/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/8650/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Attempt to update ispc
Hello team,
Upstream ispc updated to 1.10.0. Unfortunately, the build failed with
broken clang++ compiler according to koji
(https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32150411)
Can someone investigate the issue? This package is needed by embree, a
dependency for both Blender, luxcorerender and Yafaray.
Thanks
Luya
%global with_snapshot 0
%global commit e338aaaebcf0193e194b13267bc69e7a0ec4fa4d
%global shortcommit %(c=%{commit}; echo ${c:0:7})
Name: ispc
Version: 1.10.0
%if %{with_snapshot}
Release: 0.5.git.20190102.%{shortcommit}%{?dist}
%else
Release: 1%{?dist}
%endif
Summary: C-based SPMD programming language compiler
License: BSD
URL: https://ispc.github.io/
%if %{with_snapshot}
Source0: https://github.com/%{name}/%{name}/archive/%{commit}/%{name}-%{shortcommit}.tar.gz
%else
Source0: https://github.com/%{name}/%{name}/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
%endif
BuildRequires: llvm-devel
BuildRequires: clang-devel
BuildRequires: gcc-c++
BuildRequires: cmake
BuildRequires: bison
BuildRequires: doxygen
BuildRequires: flex
BuildRequires: ncurses-devel
ExclusiveArch: %{arm} %{ix86} x86_64
# Hardcoded path from 32-bit glibc-devel needed to build
# See https://github.com/ispc/ispc/wiki/Building-ispc:-Linux-and-Mac-OS-X
%ifarch x86_64
BuildRequires: /usr/lib/crt1.o
%endif
BuildRequires: zlib-devel
# Conditional build for f24 and less
%if 0%{?fedora} < 25 || 0%{?rhel} < 7
BuildRequires: python2-devel
%else
BuildRequires: python3-devel
%endif
# Set verbose compilation and remove -Werror on Makefile
# Patch0: Makefile.patch
# Patch1: 0001-Remove-uses-of-LLVM-dump-functions.patch
%description
A compiler for a variant of the C programming language, with extensions for
"single program, multiple data" (SPMD) programming.
%prep
%if %{with_snapshot}
%autosetup -n %{name}-%{commit}
%else
%autosetup -n %{name}-%{version}
%endif
%build
mkdir build
pushd build
%cmake -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++ ..
popd
%make_build gcc OPT="%{optflags}" LDFLAGS="%{__global_ldflags}"
%install
install -Dpm 0755 %{name} %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name}
%files
%license LICENSE.txt
%{_bindir}/%{name}
%changelog
* Sat Jan 19 2019 Luya Tshimbalanga - 1.10.0
- Update to 1.10.0
* Wed Dec 26 2018 Luya Tshimbalanga - 1.9.3-0.5.git.20190102.e338aaa
- Git snasphot 20190102
* Wed Dec 26 2018 Luya Tshimbalanga - 1.9.3-0.4.git.20181220.1e4bfb7
- Git snasphot 20181220
* Tue Nov 06 2018 Luya Tshimbalanga - 1.9.3-0.3.git.20181106.3d846b
- Git snasphot 1.9.3
* Fri Jul 13 2018 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.9.3-0.3.git.20180222.07fe054
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild
* Thu Mar 15 2018 Iryna Shcherbina - 1.9.3-0.2.git.20180222.07fe054
- Update Python 2 dependency declarations to new packaging standards
(See https://fedoraproject.org/wikiComponents/FinalizingFedoraSwitchtoPython3)
* Sat Mar 03 2018 Luya Tshimbalanga - 1.9.3-0.1.git.20180222.07fe054
- Update to 1.9.3 git snapshot
- Use new guideline versioning semantique for snapshot
* Fri Mar 02 2018 Luya Tshimbalanga - 1.9.2-1
- Update to 1.9.2
* Wed Feb 07 2018 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.9.1-18.git.20171023.6dc0ccc
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue Oct 24 2017 Tom Stellard - 1.9.1-17.git.20171023.6dc0ccc
- Rebase to more current snapshot for LLVM 5.0 support.
* Wed Aug 02 2017 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.9.1-16.git.20170324.a618ad4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild
* Wed Jul 26 2017 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.9.1-15.git.20170324.a618ad4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild
* Thu May 25 2017 Peter Robinson 1.9.1-14.git.20170324.a618ad4
- Rebuild clang/llvm-4
* Mon May 15 2017 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.9.1-13.git.20170324.a618ad4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_27_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri Mar 24 2017 Igor Gnatenko - 1.9.1-12.git.20170324.a618ad4
- Update to git snapshot which support LLVM4
* Thu Mar 16 2017 Luya Tshimbalanga - 1.9.1-11
- Rebuild for llvm 3.9
* Fri Feb 10 2017 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.9.1-10
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild
* Sun Nov 06 2016 Luya Tshimbalanga - 1.9.1-9
- Rebuilt agaisnt llvm
* Fri Aug 26 2016 Dan Horák 1.9.1-8
- set ExclusiveArch
* Tue Aug 23 2016 Luya Tshimbalanga 1.9.1-7
- Added conditional build for Fedora 24- and rhel7-
* Tue Aug 23 2016 Luya Tshimbalanga 1.9.1-6
- Included OPT and LDFLAGS on build line
* Tue Aug 23 2016 Luya Tshimbalanga 1.9.1-5
- Improved patch to remove -Werror line
- Removed unecesary CXXFLAGS and LDFLAGS on make_build line
- Removed useless llvm-config
* Sat Aug 20 2016 Luya Tshimbalanga 1.9.1-4
- Added gcc into make_build line
- Added patch against Makefile for verbose dialog
- Use llvm-config
* Sun Aug 14 2016 Luya Tshimbalanga 1.9.1-3
- Fixed spec
- Added missing cflags for build
- Added zlib-devel for dependency
* Sun Aug 14 2016 Luya
[Bug 1667735] perl-JSON-4.01 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1667735 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-JSON-4.01-1.fc30 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2019-01-20 18:42:53 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1180991 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Orphaning ROS packages
Hi, A while ago I set forth trying to package the come components of the Robot Operating System for use in fedora[1]. It never got to a point where the effort was usable, and I don't have the time to advance the effort anymore, so I'm orphaning the following packages: catkin python-gencpp python-genlisp python-genmsg python-genpy rospack ros-release Thanks, Rich [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Robotics/ROS_Packaging ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1667735] New: perl-JSON-4.01 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1667735 Bug ID: 1667735 Summary: perl-JSON-4.01 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-JSON Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: emman...@seyman.fr, jonstan...@gmail.com, p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 4.01 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.00-1.fc30 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/JSON/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/12847/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Self-Introduction: Michael Zhang
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 02:55:44PM +, Till Hofmann wrote: > > > On 1/20/19 2:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > Also, please attach your spec file and srpm to the bug. Don't use url > > obfuscators and don't use external hosting (people want to see where > > the links go without following them, and we want those files to be > > available infinitely, and external file hosting goes against this). > > > > I did not know that we shouldn't use external hosting, the wiki [1] also > doesn't require that, it only says: > > > Put your spec file and SRPM somewhere on the Internet where it can be > > directly downloaded (just HTTP(s), no registration pages or special > > download methods, please). > > > While I see that having them available infinitely has a benefit, it's > not enforced anywhere (and actually uncommon for the reviews I've seen). You're right, I misspoke and there is no guideline against external hosting. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Self-Introduction: Michael Zhang
On 1/20/19 2:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Also, please attach your spec file and srpm to the bug. Don't use url > obfuscators and don't use external hosting (people want to see where > the links go without following them, and we want those files to be > available infinitely, and external file hosting goes against this). > I did not know that we shouldn't use external hosting, the wiki [1] also doesn't require that, it only says: > Put your spec file and SRPM somewhere on the Internet where it can be > directly downloaded (just HTTP(s), no registration pages or special download > methods, please). While I see that having them available infinitely has a benefit, it's not enforced anywhere (and actually uncommon for the reviews I've seen). Maybe the guidelines need an update, if that's actually something we want to have? Kind regards Till [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Self-Introduction: Michael Zhang
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 10:14:27PM +, Michael Zhang wrote: > Hi, my name is > Michael.I’m currently working on the OpenLiberty project and would > like to add it as a package into the Fedora main repositories. This is my > very first time packaging a rpm and would appreciate all the support I can > get. I would like to find a sponsor to aid me in critiquing/uploading the > package within 2 months.Link to the bugzilla - href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666493; target="_blank" > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666493pub > 4096R/C4DB6583 2019-01-10 Key fingerprint = 03C6 > 619E 6EF4 73DA 7DF2 6005 872F 850A C4DB 6583uid > Michael Zhang > michael.zh...@ibm.comYouYours Sincerely,Michael > Zhang Hi Michael, welcome! My first suggestion would be to not send html email to the public mailing lists, it's generally considered unnecessary and a lot of people will skip such mails as spam. Also, please attach your spec file and srpm to the bug. Don't use url obfuscators and don't use external hosting (people want to see where the links go without following them, and we want those files to be available infinitely, and external file hosting goes against this). Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1667611] perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.90124 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1667611 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.901 ||24-1.fc30 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2019-01-20 11:16:15 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1180914 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666229] Upgrade perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu to 1.36
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666229 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu-1.36 ||-1.fc30 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2019-01-20 11:15:04 --- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1180912 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
geoipupdate rewritten, new license
Just a heads-up: Upstream has rewritten geoipupdate, a utility for fetching new versions of GeoIP databases. It was formerly written in C and GPLv2 licensed; the new version is written in Go and is (ASL 2.0 or MIT) licensed. Whilst updating, I have also dropped and obsoleted the geoipupdate-cron6 sub-package, as the database files it was fetching are no longer distributed by upstream. The new version has been built in Rawhide only. Cheers, Paul. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666229] Upgrade perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu to 1.36
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666229 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||upstream-release-monitoring ||@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman --- *** Bug 1667473 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1667473] perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu-1.36 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1667473 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2019-01-20 11:13:52 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1666229 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666228] Upgrade perl-Sentinel to 0.06
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666228 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Sentinel-0.06-1.fc30 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2019-01-20 11:12:26 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1180910 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1667454] perl-Sentinel-0.06 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1667454 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2019-01-20 11:11:03 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1666228 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666228] Upgrade perl-Sentinel to 0.06
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666228 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||upstream-release-monitoring ||@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- *** Bug 1667454 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1667714] New: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190120 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1667714 Bug ID: 1667714 Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190120 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Module-CoreList Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jose.p.oliveira@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com, st...@silug.org, tcall...@redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 5.20190120 Current version/release in rawhide: 5.20181218-1.fc30 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-CoreList/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3080/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1667713] New: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.88 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1667713 Bug ID: 1667713 Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.88 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: iarn...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 3.88 Current version/release in rawhide: 3.86-1.fc30 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPAN-Perl-Releases/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/5881/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Non-responsive maintainer - Mosaab Alzoubi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello! According Non-responsive Maintainer Policy I'm asking the maintainer to respond second time and resolve issues with package goldendict. RHBZ tickets: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1667084 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594569 Proposed PR with fix: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/goldendict/pull-request/1 - -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEGFSlHDlYR1Xq8pxov5n8bdRauQoFAlxEPjsACgkQv5n8bdRa uQpOLhAAlqcuEaRpsKkdO27Qi3XIq6BH2cmUzshQKqW98uYoP3QxepI2X1jaZ5sJ IbbROzvu2ZyOQYlWAecV1LSNgO9zDuHSC2SKhOThGa5HguGZJRtrCyILLU0w3IeD cCOpRaTy1Zg1MfaqsEqb9bZe/Fz7dzOpuVTE2HQ/YDDlwe6iA1iqAIpD1CBK2yNT qcghrpQQtZweFb72fbPbSgnE8k4GBvzYaTtbxxP1ZaXoiZqKTgwUFrFVecT9+CuR /5ffcFh38o4mb1pP8c0VjJCioSv9qf7achY0IlaZhQsC7XB+VkUH11hdoKlUC1az 9Ws8g+DFHB0Z8roUBrSQWM2hX8m+jPQqTAjE5QtGgdveggdUvII7dMIIbSLjr3hw /SrfKin6ALNvanumma02eZw93tv+YXR+uvT1HzMC/iaFwoclbFMsbUYn5gbr4viR ukJLJgN/L1w/NNI63BU3JYsuH9LC9GOY/bmyeK4w1L7zkIdL3atCyUv2QrJ+JI4e IXvmO6eIwJOENLcT9D8YUA6GSftE4nUeiWU7QT02/51vm6BLJSu53KiW8BMtD0Ij W5+oltdb6X0PRm+mzDfkgweh1kn26bHCMTM/SZUVtKxPHVHW6VYKombXDtJgwbDt BLTdGcGKBhCpcdr41EWt8BzzzcnQMnJIXNQwCThccYtXyAJn9zA= =fkRA -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
