[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-05-24 - 93% PASS

[vashirov]

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/05/24/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.22-1.fc29.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora testing-20190523.0 compose check report

[Chris Murphy]

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 6:33 PM Christopher  wrote:
>
> Do these compose reports need to spam devel@ ?
> I don't think most packagers are involved in composes, and it's hard
> to follow devel@ when it's so busy. It's already cross-posting to
> test@, that should be enough... perhaps there can be a composes@ list
> for these? Then folks can opt in.

Matches: from:(rawh...@fedoraproject.org)
Do this: Mark as read, Delete it


-- 
Chris Murphy
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora testing-20190523.0 compose check report

[Christopher]

Do these compose reports need to spam devel@ ?
I don't think most packagers are involved in composes, and it's hard
to follow devel@ when it's so busy. It's already cross-posting to
test@, that should be enough... perhaps there can be a composes@ list
for these? Then folks can opt in.

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 5:44 PM Fedora compose checker
 wrote:
>
> Missing expected images:
>
> Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
> Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
>
> Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
> --
> Mail generated by check-compose:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: pkgdb "Take" replacement?

[Adam Williamson]

On Thu, 2019-05-23 at 17:17 -0400, Christopher wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 7:18 PM Miro Hrončok  wrote:
> > On 23. 05. 19 1:15, Christopher wrote:
> > > Is there ever going to be a replacement for the old pkgdb "Take"
> > > button to take over orphaned packages?
> > > The current process of submitting a releng ticket, and waiting for
> > > somebody to take manual action, seems much worse than the old pkgdb
> > > solution.
> > 
> > Yes: https://pagure.io/pagure/pull-request/4467
> > 
> 
> +1. Unfortunately, I can't log in or comment there, because attempting
> to log in creates an error page with the phrase "discoveryfailure",
> whatever that means.

It means we're in the middle of an infra outage.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Rawhide-20190520.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 47 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** 
below

Failed openQA tests: 11/146 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 403104  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403104
ID: 403132  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403132
ID: 403133  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403133
ID: 403134  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403134
ID: 403143  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403143
ID: 403146  Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403146
ID: 403147  Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403147
ID: 403178  Test: x86_64 universal install_ext3
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403178
ID: 403183  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_ext3
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403183
ID: 403189  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_ext3@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403189
ID: 403202  Test: x86_64 universal install_ext3@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403202
ID: 403211  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403211
ID: 403214  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403214
ID: 403236  Test: i386 universal install_ext3
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403236
ID: 403241  Test: i386 universal install_blivet_ext3
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403241

Soft failed openQA tests: 3/24 (i386), 5/146 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

ID: 403107  Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403107
ID: 403108  Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403108
ID: 403119  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403119
ID: 403126  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403126
ID: 403127  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403127
ID: 403131  Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403131
ID: 403215  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403215
ID: 403217  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403217

Passed openQA tests: 117/146 (x86_64), 17/24 (i386)

Skipped gating openQA tests: 4/146 (x86_64)

ID: 403138  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_update_cli **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403138
ID: 403139  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_system_logging **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403139
ID: 403141  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_terminal **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403141
ID: 403142  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/403142

Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 11 of 172
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora updates-20190523.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64

Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora testing-20190523.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64

Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: pkgdb "Take" replacement?

[Christopher]

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 7:18 PM Miro Hrončok  wrote:
>
> On 23. 05. 19 1:15, Christopher wrote:
> > Is there ever going to be a replacement for the old pkgdb "Take"
> > button to take over orphaned packages?
> > The current process of submitting a releng ticket, and waiting for
> > somebody to take manual action, seems much worse than the old pkgdb
> > solution.
>
> Yes: https://pagure.io/pagure/pull-request/4467
>

+1. Unfortunately, I can't log in or comment there, because attempting
to log in creates an error page with the phrase "discoveryfailure",
whatever that means.
When can this be expected to be pushed to production?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1713499] New: perl-Mojolicious-8.17 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713499

Bug ID: 1713499
   Summary: perl-Mojolicious-8.17 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Mojolicious
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: emman...@seyman.fr,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
robinlee.s...@gmail.com, yan...@declera.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 8.17 Current version/release in rawhide: 8.16-1.fc31
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Mojolicious Please consult the package
updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the
service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoringPlease keep in mind
that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to
be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review
the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no
non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.Based on the
information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/5966/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1710585] Not validating valid IPv6 CIDR addresses

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1710585

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Net-CIDR-0.20-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-405d0a9d5c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 281  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d   
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
  89  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f8311ec8a2   
tor-0.3.5.8-1.el7
  57  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-d2c1368294   
cinnamon-3.6.7-5.el7
  50  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-50a6a1ddfd   
afflib-3.7.18-2.el7
  23  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c499781e80   
python-gnupg-0.4.4-1.el7
  21  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-bc0182548b   
bubblewrap-0.3.3-2.el7
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-04c7455f6a   
singularity-3.1.1-1.1.el7
   7  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-0d44655ca3   
mediaconch-18.03.2-7.el7 libmediainfo-19.04-1.el7 mediainfo-19.04-1.el7
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-1605b73a09   
drupal7-7.67-1.el7
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-d96aef0d8f   
rust-1.34.2-1.el7
   3  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-87fa8d93b6   
drupal7-entity-1.9-1.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

RBTools-1.0.2-1.el7
drupal7-footnotes-3.1-2.el7
perl-Net-CIDR-0.20-1.el7
purple-discord-0-23.20190505git8623ec7.el7
purple-hangouts-0-63.20190303hgeffc9b4.el7
purple-libsteam-1.6.1-25.20190117gitfeece3c.el7
purple-skypeweb-1.5-5.20190520git5d29285.el7
python-flit-1.3-2.el7
python-tqdm-4.10.0-2.el7.3
python3-colorama-0.4.1-1.el7

Details about builds:



 RBTools-1.0.2-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-2498e6070f)
 Tools for use with ReviewBoard

Update Information:

# RBTools 1.0.2 Release Notes## Packaging  * The ``backports.shutil``
package is no longer needed or installed on Python   3.x.   Patch by Stephen
Gallagher.   ## New Features  ### rbt post  * Added helpful instructions when
configuring RBTools to use the wrong   Review Board server URL.   When
encountering a bad URL, RBTools will try to determine the mistake   and offer
advice for fixing it. For instance, if it appears to be an   RBCommons_ URL, it
will notify if the URL is constructed correctly or if   the team could not be
found.   Ultimately, this avoids confusion and frustration we've seen when first
getting going with RBTools.  * Reworked Two-Factor Authentication support for
[RBCommons](https://rbcommons.com/).   This release will be needed going forward
in order to support two-factor   authentication with RBCommons accounts.  *
Added a :option:`--no-renames` flag for removing rename information from Git
diffs.   This is used to override the default behavior in which we have Git look
for file changes that could be renames. It's useful when Git is finding
changes that should be seen as entirely new files and turning them into
renamed files.  Patch by Brian LeBlanc.   ## Bug Fixes   ### General   * Fixed
several general Python 3.x compatibility issues.   This includes fixes for
executing external processes and retrieving output,   executing aliases, custom
RBTools commands, iterating through resources in   the API, and errors in some
help output.   ### Aliases  * Fixed parsing of shell-based aliases.   When using
aliases that make use of shell-based commands (ones starting with   ``!``),
RBTools no longer strips any quotes in the command or evaluates   escape
sequences, instead allowing the shell to handle this.   Patch by Barret Rennie.
### API  * Fixed Python 3.x compatibility issues with iterating through pages of
resources.  * Improved error output when encountering missing resources.   ###
Git  * Fixed working with Git clones that don't have an ``origin`` remote.
RBTools will now try to determine an appropriate remote. If
:option:`--tracking-branch` was provided, that remote will be used,   otherwise
the remote configured for the current branch will be used. If   a suitable
remote could not be found, the first configured remote (or   ``origin`` if not
found) will be used, and a warning will be shown.   ### Perforce  * Fixed
including information on binary files in diffs. (:bug:`3659`)   ### rbt diff  *
Fixed Unicode compatibility issues on Python 3.x. (:bug:`4754`)   ### rbt patch
* Fixed applying patches from users with private profiles.   If a user has
marked their profile private, their full name and e-mail   address wouldn't be
available, causing :command:`rbt patch` to crash.  * Fixed :option:`rbt patch
--print` on Python 3.x. (:bug:`4736`)   Patch by Basil Crow.   ### rbt post  *
Fixed compatibility with Python 3.5. (:bug:`4762`)   Patch by David Cain.   ##
Contributors * Barret Rennie * Basil Crow * Brian LeBlanc * Christian Hammond *
David Cain * David Trowbridge * Stephen Gallagher

[Bug 1705666] please add perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite to epel7

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1705666

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite
   ||-0.11-22.el7
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2019-05-23 20:41:45



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite-0.11-22.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1713481] perl-SQL-Shell-1.16 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713481



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Skipping the scratch build because an SRPM could not be built: ['git', 'clone',
'https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/perl-SQL-Shell.git',
'/var/tmp/thn-b_9_ute0'] returned 128: b"Cloning into
'/var/tmp/thn-b_9_ute0'...\nfatal: repository
'https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/perl-SQL-Shell.git/' not found\n"

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1713481] New: perl-SQL-Shell-1.16 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713481

Bug ID: 1713481
   Summary: perl-SQL-Shell-1.16 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-SQL-Shell
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 1.16 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.15-9.fc30
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/SQL-Shell/ Please consult the package updates
policy before you issue an update to a stable branch:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the
service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoringPlease keep in mind
that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to
be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review
the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no
non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.Based on the
information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project//

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Disable Root Password Login in SSH

[Adam Williamson]

On Thu, 2019-05-23 at 12:13 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 7:24 AM Stephen Gallagher  wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 2:54 PM Ben Cotton  wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DisableRootPasswordLoginInSshd
> > > 
> > > == Summary ==
> > > The upstream OpenSSH disabled password logins for root back in 2015.
> > > The Fedora should follow to keep security expectation and avoid users
> > > surprises with this configuration.
> > > 
> > > == Owner ==
> > > * Name: [[User:jjelen| Jakub Jelen]], OpenSSH maintainer
> > > * Email: jje...@redhat.com
> > > 
> > > == Detailed Description ==
> > > 
> > > The OpenSSH server configuration contains a configuration option
> > > `PermitRootLogin`, which controls whether the root user is allowed to
> > > login using passwords or using public key authentication. The root
> > > login is target of most of the random or targeted attack on Linux
> > > systems and password is usually the weakest part. For that reason, the
> > > upstream OpenSSH changed this option in 2015 to `prohibit-password`,
> > > which still allows public-key authentication, but prevents the
> > > password logins. Fedora was for many practical reasons keeping the old
> > > configuration since then, but the difference is no longer bearable and
> > > might confuse users expecting the root logins will not be enabled out
> > > of the box.
> > > 
> > > On the other hand, there is still a lot of infrastructure, installers
> > > and test instances that simply might depend on this configuration and
> > > therefore this change needs to go through the system-wide change so
> > > everyone is onboard.
> > > 
> > > == Benefit to Fedora ==
> > > 
> > > This will provide more secure Fedora installations out of the box and
> > > prevent inadvertently accessible root logins in the wild.
> > > 
> > 
> > I'm not particularly *opposed* to this change in behavior, but in the
> > Fedora Server case, SSH is the primary mechanism for gaining access to
> > the system. If we disallow password logins for root, then many
> > installs will be inaccessible and users will get... grumpy.
> 
> I usually ssh in and enroll my machines to my ipa server, I am not
> sure how we can do that in the arm cases where we use pre-generated
> images. I know I can use cockpit,  however, the socket is generally
> disabled, and them seems to randomly get disabled post install.

Cockpit is supposed to be accessible and working out of the box in all
Server installs, it's in the release criteria. If you're hitting a case
where that isn't working, please do file a bug and mark it as a release
blocker...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] please review: PR 50372 - Properly request and process NSS SSL version range

[Mark Reynolds]

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50372
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1712905] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.04 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712905



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.04-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ca53886ba5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1712909] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190522 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712909



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190522-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3e7271cf9f

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1708964] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.00 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708964



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.04-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ca53886ba5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1711460] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.02 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711460



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.04-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ca53886ba5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1711460] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.02 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711460

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.04-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1a774fc0aa

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1712802] Upgrade perl-Time-Duration-Parse to 0.15

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712802

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Time-Duration-Parse-0.15-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c2aa168a4b

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1712909] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190522 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712909

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190522-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-f11cbdf9d6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1708964] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.00 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708964

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.04-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1a774fc0aa

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1712905] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.04 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712905



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.04-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1a774fc0aa

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1709725] perl-Log-Report-1.28 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1709725

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Log-Report-1.28-1.fc31 |perl-Log-Report-1.28-1.fc31
   |perl-Log-Report-1.28-1.fc30 |perl-Log-Report-1.28-1.fc30
   ||perl-Log-Report-1.28-1.fc28



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Log-Report-1.28-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: pkgdb new package fedmsg replacement

[Brian (bex) Exelbierd]

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 7:58 PM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
>
> On 5/23/19 3:22 AM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > What is now sending fedmsg events when a new package is added to
> > Fedora?  Amongst other thigns, we have a badge that isn't being
> > awarded and I can't even figure out how to easily audit to catch it
> > up.
>
> Should be:
>
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/datagrepper/raw?topic=org.fedoraproject.prod.pagure.project.new

This seems to solve signalling the new package, but it doesn't
actually show us who the contributor was.

regards,

bex

>
> kevin
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



-- 
Brian "bex" Exelbierd (he/him/his)
Fedora Community Action & Impact Coordinator
@bexelbie | http://www.winglemeyer.org
bexel...@redhat.com | b...@pobox.com
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: pkgdb new package fedmsg replacement

[Kevin Fenzi]

On 5/23/19 3:22 AM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> What is now sending fedmsg events when a new package is added to
> Fedora?  Amongst other thigns, we have a badge that isn't being
> awarded and I can't even figure out how to easily audit to catch it
> up.

Should be:

https://apps.fedoraproject.org/datagrepper/raw?topic=org.fedoraproject.prod.pagure.project.new

kevin



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1709868] perl-Devel-PatchPerl-1.60 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1709868

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Devel-PatchPerl-1.60-1 |perl-Devel-PatchPerl-1.60-1
   |.fc31   |.fc31
   ||perl-Devel-PatchPerl-1.60-1
   ||.fc30
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Devel-PatchPerl-1.60-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1709725] perl-Log-Report-1.28 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1709725

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-Log-Report-1.28-1.fc31 |perl-Log-Report-1.28-1.fc31
   ||perl-Log-Report-1.28-1.fc30
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2019-05-23 17:48:12



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Log-Report-1.28-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1520948] Upgrade perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI to 0.38

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520948

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSG
   ||I-0.39-1.fc30
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2019-05-23 17:48:06



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI-0.39-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: please remove me from list

[Jakub Jelen]

This is a wrong email to write such a request.

On Thu, 2019-05-23 at 12:51 -0400, xtify wrote:
> 
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

^^ This is the one you should try.

> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- 
Jakub Jelen
Senior Software Engineer
Security Technologies
Red Hat, Inc.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Disable Root Password Login in SSH

[Dennis Gilmore]

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 7:24 AM Stephen Gallagher  wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 2:54 PM Ben Cotton  wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DisableRootPasswordLoginInSshd
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > The upstream OpenSSH disabled password logins for root back in 2015.
> > The Fedora should follow to keep security expectation and avoid users
> > surprises with this configuration.
> >
> > == Owner ==
> > * Name: [[User:jjelen| Jakub Jelen]], OpenSSH maintainer
> > * Email: jje...@redhat.com
> >
> > == Detailed Description ==
> >
> > The OpenSSH server configuration contains a configuration option
> > `PermitRootLogin`, which controls whether the root user is allowed to
> > login using passwords or using public key authentication. The root
> > login is target of most of the random or targeted attack on Linux
> > systems and password is usually the weakest part. For that reason, the
> > upstream OpenSSH changed this option in 2015 to `prohibit-password`,
> > which still allows public-key authentication, but prevents the
> > password logins. Fedora was for many practical reasons keeping the old
> > configuration since then, but the difference is no longer bearable and
> > might confuse users expecting the root logins will not be enabled out
> > of the box.
> >
> > On the other hand, there is still a lot of infrastructure, installers
> > and test instances that simply might depend on this configuration and
> > therefore this change needs to go through the system-wide change so
> > everyone is onboard.
> >
> > == Benefit to Fedora ==
> >
> > This will provide more secure Fedora installations out of the box and
> > prevent inadvertently accessible root logins in the wild.
> >
>
> I'm not particularly *opposed* to this change in behavior, but in the
> Fedora Server case, SSH is the primary mechanism for gaining access to
> the system. If we disallow password logins for root, then many
> installs will be inaccessible and users will get... grumpy.

I usually ssh in and enroll my machines to my ipa server, I am not
sure how we can do that in the arm cases where we use pre-generated
images. I know I can use cockpit,  however, the socket is generally
disabled, and them seems to randomly get disabled post install.

Dennis

> There aren't really any major problems for interactive installs where
> the user has direct console access, so I'll disregard that case for
> the moment. For kickstart-based installs, I suppose users would
> normally know to put their SSH public keys in place, so that's also
> less of a concern.
>
> The problematic case I see is the remote VNC headless install. The
> installation is interactive, but there may not be a way to gain direct
> access to the installed system after that. We need to ensure that the
> resulting system is always accessible. Right now, the interactive
> installer would allow us (even encourage us) to set up that machine
> with only a root user and password, which after this Change would mean
> that the system is not reachable.
>
> I see some possible options here, all requiring Anaconda changes:
> 1) Provide a checkbox in the root user creation spoke (defaulting to
> "off") to enable root password logins over SSH. Ideally with notes
> about why it's recommended not to do this.
> 2) Allow users to provide a public SSH key for the root user. Since
> this is generally not performed in an environment where the keys can
> be copy-pasted, we'd probably need to allow specifying a [tiny]URL for
> an authorized_keys file.
> 3) Force Anaconda to require the creation of a non-root user that is a
> member of the `wheel` group, so that this user can be used to SSH in
> and administer the system. Essentially, remove the root user creation
> spoke as an option from the interactive install.
> 4) Force Cockpit to be installed and available on any system that
> doesn't select a non-root user at installation time. This will allow a
> password-based login and allows the root user to set up their SSH keys
> via the "Accounts" tab.
>
> I'm all for hearing what other options we may have here, but those are
> the simplest ones I can think of.
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

please remove me from list

[xtify]

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Disable Root Password Login in SSH

[Przemek Klosowski]

On 5/23/19 10:24 AM, stan via devel wrote:

On Mon, 20 May 2019 14:33:57 -0400
Przemek Klosowski via devel  wrote:
  

Right, but it's just a stepping stone to a world with universal
authentication, and granular authorization based on credentials from
that universal authentication.

I hope that world never arrives.  That would be absolutely terrible for
privacy.


Well, I am all for privacy as well. Here, however, we're talking about 
our activity in the open forum: our hobbies or jobs. Right now , to use 
my favorite analogy, we treat our computer accounts as pets---but the 
technology results in so many  of them that we need to learn to treat 
them as cattle. I DO want to federate all (or at least most) of my 
computer accounts under my 'official' identity. If I wanted to hide my 
crocheting activities hidden from the world at large, I should still be 
able to create a separate identity.




And if, heaven forbid, the universal authentication became
compromised, it would destroy an individual.


The single authentication does not have to be a single point of failure: 
access to individual resources could still be  gated by per-resource 
passwords or other secret identifiers. This is all still in flux : 
nobody knows how to do it correctly in a way that is both secure and 
convenient---maybe it'll take some sort of hardware security tokens like 
Yubico or RSA, or maybe software credential stores that use built-in 
security mechanisms like TPM and/or ARM TrustZone.


The current situation of completely separate authentication schemes is 
unsustainable, and has to change into some more-like-herding-cattle scheme.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: mflobo

[Alfredo Moralejo Alonso]

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 9:37 AM Didier Fabert 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> It's a little off topic, but where your fedora_active_user.py script
> come from ?
>
> I have the same problem and according to the
> Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers[1], the "official" repo is
> on github[2].
>
>
That's the one i used and works fine for me.


> I cannot run successfully this script with python2 or python3,and with
> the latest fedora_cert[3] lib.
>
> 
> [1]
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/
> [2] https://github.com/pypingou/fedora-active-user
> [3] https://pagure.io/fedora-packager/blob/master/f/src/fedora_cert
>
> Le 21/05/2019 à 15:13, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've been trying to contact mflobo in order to get some packages updated
> > but didn't get any response:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711394
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711395
> >
> > Output of fedora_active_user.py:
> >
> > Last login in FAS:
> > mflobo 2017-02-23
> > Last action on koji:
> > Tue, 15 Jan 2019 package list entry revoked: python-muranoclient in
> > trashcan by oscar
> > Last package update on bodhi:
> > 2016-04-15 15:26:46 on package python-muranoclient-0.8.4-1.fc24
> > Last actions performed according to fedmsg:
> >- amora...@redhat.com  updated nothing
> on
> > RHBZ#1711395 'Update to latest release upstream 1.12.0' on 2019-05-17
> > 18:58:33 ()
> >- amora...@redhat.com  updated nothing
> on
> > RHBZ#1711394 'Update to latest released upstream 3.8.0' on 2019-05-17
> > 18:55:32 ()
> >- upstream-release-monitoring updated 'short_desc' on RHBZ#1445107
> > 'python-mistralclient-3.9.0 is available' on 2019-05-16 11:14:55 ()
> >- upstream-release-monitoring updated 'short_desc' on RHBZ#1445107
> > 'python-mistralclient-3.8.1 is available' on 2019-05-14 17:11:52 ()
> >- upstream-release-monitoring updated 'short_desc' on RHBZ#1445107
> > 'python-mistralclient-3.8.0 is available' on 2019-03-08 22:12:32 ()
> >- zbys...@in.waw.pl  updated 'bug_status',
> > 'cf_fixed_in', and 'resolution' on RHBZ#1579356 'python-mistralclient
> > has no dist tag' on 2019-02-15 18:02:32 ()
> >- mhron...@redhat.com  updated
> > 'bug_status', 'flag.needinfo', and 'resolution' on RHBZ#1560485
> > 'python-muranoclient: Switch to Python 3 ...' on 2019-01-09 15:27:54 ()
> >- mhron...@redhat.com  updated
> > 'flag.needinfo' on RHBZ#1560485 'python-muranoclient: Switch to Python 3
> > ...' on 2019-01-09 15:27:53 ()
> >- mhron...@redhat.com  updated 'status',
> > 'cf_fixed_in', 'resolution', and 'cf_last_closed' on RHBZ#1649010
> > 'python-vitrageclient: Remove (sub)packag...' on 2018-11-19 14:36:19 ()
> >- mhron...@redhat.com  updated 'status'
> > and 'assigned_to' on RHBZ#1649010 'python-vitrageclient: Remove
> > (sub)packag...' on 2018-11-19 14:29:14 ()
> >
> >
> > According to https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/mflobo he's the only
> > maintainer for python-mistralclient, python-congressclient and
> > python-yaql. As these three are somehow related to OpenStack packages,
> > i'd be happy to take them as maintainer.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Alfredo
> >
> > ___
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: How to maintain python-urwid orphaned package

[Dridi Boukelmoune]

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 3:22 PM Tomas Tomecek  wrote:
>
> This is still on my backlog, ideally, to also add python2 support and
> add it to epel7. Miro was so nice and fixed the package in rawhide so
> it works with python3.

Why add python2 support? epel7 has python3 support nowadays.

> Feel free to open pull requests via
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-urwid, all the help is very
> welcome! Feel free to drop me an e-mail (or open a bugzilla) for the
> work you'd like to do.
>
>
> Tomas
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 6:42 PM Miro Hrončok  wrote:
> >
> > On 21. 05. 19 18:23, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> > > I am interested in supporting the python-urwid package. How do I do 
> > > this?I am
> > > able to compile without errors and create the rpm locally. I have an FAS 
> > > account
> > > called aarem.
> >
> > Tomáš is already the maintainer.
> >
> > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8369
> >
> > Talk to him if you want to offer help.
> >
> > --
> > Miro Hrončok
> > --
> > Phone: +420777974800
> > IRC: mhroncok
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Disable Root Password Login in SSH

[stan via devel]

On Mon, 20 May 2019 14:33:57 -0400
Przemek Klosowski via devel  wrote:
 
> Right, but it's just a stepping stone to a world with universal 
> authentication, and granular authorization based on credentials from 
> that universal authentication.

I hope that world never arrives.  That would be absolutely terrible for
privacy.  And if, heaven forbid, the universal authentication became
compromised, it would destroy an individual.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: How to maintain python-urwid orphaned package

[Tomas Tomecek]

This is still on my backlog, ideally, to also add python2 support and
add it to epel7. Miro was so nice and fixed the package in rawhide so
it works with python3.

Feel free to open pull requests via
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-urwid, all the help is very
welcome! Feel free to drop me an e-mail (or open a bugzilla) for the
work you'd like to do.


Tomas

On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 6:42 PM Miro Hrončok  wrote:
>
> On 21. 05. 19 18:23, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> > I am interested in supporting the python-urwid package. How do I do this?I 
> > am
> > able to compile without errors and create the rpm locally. I have an FAS 
> > account
> > called aarem.
>
> Tomáš is already the maintainer.
>
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8369
>
> Talk to him if you want to offer help.
>
> --
> Miro Hrončok
> --
> Phone: +420777974800
> IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1713173] perl-Perl-Critic-1.134 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713173

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2019-05-23 11:36:36



--- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth  ---
Build done:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35008280

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

pkgdb new package fedmsg replacement

[Brian (bex) Exelbierd]

Hi,

What is now sending fedmsg events when a new package is added to
Fedora?  Amongst other thigns, we have a badge that isn't being
awarded and I can't even figure out how to easily audit to catch it
up.

thanks,

bex
-- 
Brian "bex" Exelbierd (he/him/his)
Fedora Community Action & Impact Coordinator
@bexelbie | http://www.winglemeyer.org
bexel...@redhat.com | b...@pobox.com
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: glassfish-jsp needs new permanent maintainer(s)

[Fabio Valentini]

On Thu, May 23, 2019, 01:31 Sérgio Basto  wrote:

> On Wed, 2019-05-22 at 23:56 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > If nobody claims the package within the next two weeks, we will
> > orphan
> > it again, setting it on its course towards retirement in about two
> > months.
>
> Why ? IMHO if package is not FTBFS or have unresolved bugs , it should
> remain on Fedora , I believe some packages don't need much attention
> for a long time ...
>

But they *do desperately* need attention - more than we can give them.

Most packages are severely outdated or suffer from bitrot - and it didn't
help that eclipse dropped support for 32bit architectures, which broke
almost half our packages on 32bit arches. We still don't have a solution
for that.

And concerning FTBFS issues - we fixed those, but there's no guarantee that
we can manage to do that for fedora 32 again.

Fabio


> --
> Sérgio M. B.
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: glassfish-jsp needs new permanent maintainer(s)

[Fabio Valentini]

On Thu, May 23, 2019, 01:01 Christopher  wrote:

> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 5:56 PM Fabio Valentini 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello packagers,
> >
> > The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
> > maintenance for the glassfish-jsp package, and none of our packages
> > depend on it. So, we're looking for someone to take better care of it,
> > preferably someone who actively uses glassfish-jsp or maintains a
> > package that depends on it.
> >
> > For reference, the following packages have a direct dependency on
> > glassfish-jsp, either at build- or at install-time:
> >
> > - eclipse
> > - hadoop
> > - jspc
> >
> >
> > If you received this email directly, you're a (co-)maintainer of one
> > of these packages, and would probably be best qualified to take care
> > of glassfish-jsp.
> >
> > If you want to take glassfish-jsp off our hands, fill out the
> > "package_adoption_request" template here:
> > https://www.pagure.io/stewardship-sig/new_issue
> >
> > If nobody claims the package within the next two weeks, we will orphan
> > it again, setting it on its course towards retirement in about two
> > months.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Fabio (decathorpe), for the Stewardship SIG
>

Hi Christopher,


> It seems to me that the steady flow of orphaning happening by the
> Stewardship SIG is not much better than the previous mass orphaning,
> especially for casual packagers who depend on these.


We never promised more than a "life extension" for these packages. The SIG
can act as glue so that the foundation other packagers depend on doesn't
crumble over night. But if the foundations don't settle and these packages
get permanent maintainers, glue won't be enough to keep it together.

I understand the
> Stewardship SIG can't maintain these indefinitely, but I was kinda
> hoping for at least one or two Fedora releases...


*Two* fedora releases? That's a bit optimistic.

to have enough time
> to come to terms with the missing deps and to try to understand
> modularity. At the current rate, it seems we're still headed for mass
> orphaning and/or many one-package-each modules in the near future.
>

No. I outlined the procedure were following multiple times, and at the
current rate, it will take 1-2 years to go through all our packages. So
actually, for packages deeper in the stack, 2 years isn't so optimistic
after all.


It's just that we started the cleanup procedure at the top of the stack,
and you're affected by that already.

Fabio

>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1713020] perl-Pod-Simple-3.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713020



--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar  ---
*** Bug 1713019 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1713019] perl-Pod-Simple-3.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713019

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Last Closed||2019-05-23 07:08:15



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1713020 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1713020] perl-Pod-Simple-3.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713020

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Pod-Simple-3.36-1.fc31
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2019-05-23 07:07:06



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
Some fixes and some enhancementes. Because it makes a nested L<> tag a fatal
error, suitable for Rawhide only.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org