Self Introduction: Gordon Messmer
Hello, My name is Gordon Messmer. I've been a long-time user of Red Hat systems, starting with Red Hat Linux 4.2 in 1997. I've been packaging software in rpm format for use in business environments for very nearly as long. I've also been a semi-active member of the Red Hat and Fedora mailing lists most of those years. My first contribution will be ansible-bender: a tool that builds container images using ansible playbooks. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714377 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1714419] New: ack-3.0.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714419 Bug ID: 1714419 Summary: ack-3.0.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: ack Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: robinlee.s...@gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, robinlee.s...@gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 3.0.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.999.06-1.fc31 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/ack/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/15/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1714419] ack-3.0.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714419 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Skipping the scratch build because an SRPM could not be built: ['fedpkg', 'sources'] returned 1: b'' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora testing-20190528.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) ID: 406540 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406540 ID: 406541 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406541 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1711460] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.02 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711460 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0fefa5ba85 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1708964] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.00 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708964 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0fefa5ba85 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1712905] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.04 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712905 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0fefa5ba85 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1712909] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190522 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712909 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190524-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2304aab011 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1713817] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190524 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713817 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190524-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2304aab011 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1713815] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713815 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0fefa5ba85 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-05-28 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Modularity Team. More information available at: [Modularity Team Docs](https://docs.pagure.org/modularity/) The agenda for the meeting is available as flagged tickets [in the Modularity repository](https://pagure.io/modularity/issues?status=Open=Meeting). Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9480/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1712905] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.04 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712905 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ae8a88278d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1713815] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713815 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ae8a88278d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1713817] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190524 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713817 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190524-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-d0f1498935 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1708964] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.00 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708964 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ae8a88278d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1711460] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.02 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711460 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ae8a88278d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1712909] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190522 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712909 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190524-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-d0f1498935 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-05-28 - 93% PASS
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/05/28/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.3-20190527git71e2711.fc29.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1708964] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.00 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708964 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0576b2a1f3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1713911] perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.065 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713911 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.065-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ab40840fa8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1712905] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.04 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712905 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0576b2a1f3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1711460] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.02 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711460 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0576b2a1f3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1713815] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713815 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0576b2a1f3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1713817] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190524 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713817 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190524-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-5887d3e6d6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1712909] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190522 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712909 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190524-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-5887d3e6d6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora updates-20190528.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) ID: 406538 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406538 ID: 406539 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406539 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1711066] perl-Net-HTTP-6.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711066 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Net-HTTP-6.19-1.fc31 |perl-Net-HTTP-6.19-1.fc31 |perl-Net-HTTP-6.19-1.fc30 |perl-Net-HTTP-6.19-1.fc30 |perl-Net-HTTP-6.19-1.fc28 |perl-Net-HTTP-6.19-1.fc28 ||perl-Net-HTTP-6.19-1.fc29 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-HTTP-6.19-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1710529] perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.16 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1710529 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.16-1 |perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.16-1 |.fc30 |.fc30 |perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.16-1 |perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.16-1 |.fc28 |.fc28 ||perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.16-1 ||.fc29 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.16-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1711066] perl-Net-HTTP-6.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711066 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Net-HTTP-6.19-1.fc31 |perl-Net-HTTP-6.19-1.fc31 |perl-Net-HTTP-6.19-1.fc30 |perl-Net-HTTP-6.19-1.fc30 ||perl-Net-HTTP-6.19-1.fc28 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-HTTP-6.19-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1710529] perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.16 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1710529 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.16-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1711066] perl-Net-HTTP-6.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711066 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-Net-HTTP-6.19-1.fc31 |perl-Net-HTTP-6.19-1.fc31 ||perl-Net-HTTP-6.19-1.fc30 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-05-28 01:09:52 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-HTTP-6.19-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1710529] perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.16 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1710529 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.16-1 ||.fc30 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-05-28 01:09:47 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.16-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: C++ help needed fixing VXL on 32 bit architectures
https://github.com/vxl/vxl/issues/638
Independent of that particular issue, it is hard to believe the claim
"vxl: A multi-platform collection of C++ software libraries ...".
They're not making a good-faith effort to be portable.
The first hint is that "-Werror" (turn all warnings into errors)
has not been used when compiling.
There are so many basic portability errors, such as:
= portability error 1
v3p/netlib/triangle.c:219: #define TRIANGLE_PTRINT size_t
Using #define is silly when typedef is suitable.
v3p/netlib/triangle.c:3685:23: warning: format '%lx' expects argument of type
'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'unsigned int' [-Wformat=]
printf("triangle x%lx with orientation %d:\n", (TRIANGLE_PTRINT) t->tri,
"%zx" solves this problem and has been available for many years.
= portability error 2
v3p/clipper/clipper.cpp:722:34: warning: 'void* memset(void*, int, size_t)'
clearing an object of non-trivial type 'struct ClipperLib::TEdge'
Learn from the compiler; it is smarter than this programmer.
(Example: if there are any 'virtual' functions [now or later!],
then using memset zaps the vtable pointer.)
== portability error 3
core/vil1/vil1_memory_image_impl.cxx:210:63: warning: suggest parentheses
around assignment used as truth value [-Wparentheses]
return property_value ? (*(bool*)property_value) = true : true;
This is unmaintainable, especially when not explained in a comment.
= portability error 4
core/vil1/file_formats/vil1_pnm.cxx:360:11: warning: this 'if' clause does not
guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
if ((t&=7)==0) *++ib=0; int a; (*vs_) >> a; if (a) *ib|=static_cast(1<<(7-t)); }
Such code is an abomination for lack of clarity.
Also, the preceding line
for (int x=0,t=0; xhttps://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: C++ help needed fixing VXL on 32 bit architectures
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 2:54 PM Jerry James wrote: > It looks like the first few errors, at least, were fixed the day after > the last release, in this commit: > > https://github.com/vxl/vxl/commit/c3fd27959f51e0469a7a6075e975f245ac306f3d > > You might try adding that as a patch and see if that is sufficient, or > if there are more problems. I did a local mock build for i386 with that patch, and it succeeded. FYI. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Replacing glibc langpacks
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 5:36 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > I'm investigating whether it makes sense to switch to a scheme where the > glibc locale data is built from source, during package installation, > based on the langpack configuration system. This is similar to what > Debian does. May I wildly discourage this? It's too sensitive to local libraries and binary updates, and reduces stability for what should be a very stable package. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1714366] New: perl-bareword-filehandles-0.007 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714366 Bug ID: 1714366 Summary: perl-bareword-filehandles-0.007 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-bareword-filehandles Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: iarn...@gmail.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.007 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.006-4.fc30 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/bareword-filehandles/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/10743/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: C++ help needed fixing VXL on 32 bit architectures
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 10:14 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > After spending quite a bit of time fixing VXL to build, I've now run > into errors with it building on 32 bit arches. > > Unfortunately, I don't foresee myself having enough cycles in the near > future to debug the C++ bits to see what's happening here, and while I > have filed a ticket upstream, they seem to be even busier than us (all > issues seem to get a "A PR would be welcome" response) > > https://github.com/vxl/vxl/issues/638 > > Any chance any C++ ninjas here would have some time to look into this > please? A PR fixing the issue upstream would be absolutely fantastic. It looks like the first few errors, at least, were fixed the day after the last release, in this commit: https://github.com/vxl/vxl/commit/c3fd27959f51e0469a7a6075e975f245ac306f3d You might try adding that as a patch and see if that is sufficient, or if there are more problems. Regards, -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Replacing glibc langpacks
On Mon, 27 May 2019 at 20:13, Florian Weimer wrote: [.,] > > In other words your proposition is *not* about not any kind of > > reduction size but increase size of installed resources because those > > binary files which needs to be present will be increased by source of > > those binary files. Other thing is that generating those files on > > install-time elongates install time. > > 2.9 MiB (compiled en_US.utf8 locale) plus 3.4 MiB (compressed locale > sources without charmaps) is 6.3 MiB, which is less than 6.7 MiB > (current installed glibc-langpack-en size). It should be possible to minimise this size by use proper %lang(en_US) tagging. Only this and nothing more. Nevertheless Fedora is not using rpm as it is designed .. shame but that is only cause of what is seen as the issue in this context. kloczek -- Tomasz Kłoczko | LinkedIn: http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Replacing glibc langpacks
* Tomasz Kłoczko: > On Mon, 27 May 2019 at 10:41, Florian Weimer wrote: >> I'm investigating whether it makes sense to switch to a scheme where the >> glibc locale data is built from source, during package installation, >> based on the langpack configuration system. This is similar to what >> Debian does. >> >> The reason is that the compressed locale source code (without the >> charmaps, which are not strictly needed once we patch localedef) is >> smaller than the subset of locales of a langpack package which people >> actually. For example, glibc-langpack-en on Fedora 29 is 6.7 MiB when >> installed, but en_US.utf8 is 2.9 MiB, and the locale sources are >> 3.4 MiB, so even the common case realizes a small saving. >> >> For the installer, the savings might be much larger. If we can teach >> anaconda to generate the appropriate locale only after the user has >> selected the language, then we no longer need the full locale archive in >> the installation image (and in RAM). > > In other words your proposition is *not* about not any kind of > reduction size but increase size of installed resources because those > binary files which needs to be present will be increased by source of > those binary files. Other thing is that generating those files on > install-time elongates install time. 2.9 MiB (compiled en_US.utf8 locale) plus 3.4 MiB (compressed locale sources without charmaps) is 6.3 MiB, which is less than 6.7 MiB (current installed glibc-langpack-en size). Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Rawhide-20190527.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 15/137 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) ID: 406384 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406384 ID: 406385 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406385 ID: 406386 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406386 ID: 406392 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406392 ID: 406411 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406411 ID: 406423 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_selinux URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406423 ID: 406424 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406424 ID: 406425 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_service_manipulation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406425 ID: 406428 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406428 ID: 406432 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406432 ID: 406433 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406433 ID: 406435 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406435 ID: 406474 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406474 ID: 406486 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406486 ID: 406501 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406501 ID: 406503 Test: x86_64 universal install_shrink_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406503 Soft failed openQA tests: 3/24 (i386), 5/137 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 406395 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406395 ID: 406396 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406396 ID: 406407 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406407 ID: 406414 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406414 ID: 406415 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406415 ID: 406419 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406419 ID: 406494 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406494 ID: 406496 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/406496 Passed openQA tests: 117/137 (x86_64), 21/24 (i386) Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 1 of 163 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Replacing glibc langpacks
On Mon, 27 May 2019 at 10:41, Florian Weimer wrote: > I'm investigating whether it makes sense to switch to a scheme where the > glibc locale data is built from source, during package installation, > based on the langpack configuration system. This is similar to what > Debian does. > > The reason is that the compressed locale source code (without the > charmaps, which are not strictly needed once we patch localedef) is > smaller than the subset of locales of a langpack package which people > actually. For example, glibc-langpack-en on Fedora 29 is 6.7 MiB when > installed, but en_US.utf8 is 2.9 MiB, and the locale sources are > 3.4 MiB, so even the common case realizes a small saving. > > For the installer, the savings might be much larger. If we can teach > anaconda to generate the appropriate locale only after the user has > selected the language, then we no longer need the full locale archive in > the installation image (and in RAM). In other words your proposition is *not* about not any kind of reduction size but increase size of installed resources because those binary files which needs to be present will be increased by source of those binary files. Other thing is that generating those files on install-time elongates install time. Remember that dpkg does not have any kind equivalent of rpm %lang() tagging in packages descriptions. In that exactly context Fedora still does not properly setups /etc/rpm/macros::%_install_langs macro and instead setting that macro during install-time provides langpack packages (which IMO is at least engendering/design mistake/misunderstanding). kloczek -- Tomasz Kłoczko | LinkedIn: http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Nonresponsive maintainer: salimma
Sorry for the late reply! Trying to avoid using my work computers for personal open source work but that makes it hard to juggle when traveling. On Mon, May 27, 2019, 02:00 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 23. 06. 18 13:38, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589077 > > > > Does anyone know how to contact the maintainer? > > Once again, the same question. > > -- > Miro Hrončok > -- > Phone: +420777974800 > IRC: mhroncok > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190527.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190524.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190527.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 11 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 55 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 43.77 MiB Size of dropped packages:12.77 KiB Size of upgraded packages: 2.15 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 61.90 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Server raw-xz armhfp Path: Server/armhfp/images/Fedora-Server-armhfp-Rawhide-20190527.n.0-sda.raw.xz Image: KDE raw-xz armhfp Path: Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-KDE-armhfp-Rawhide-20190527.n.0-sda.raw.xz = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Astronomy_KDE live i386 Path: Labs/i386/iso/Fedora-Astronomy_KDE-Live-i386-Rawhide-20190524.n.1.iso Image: Python_Classroom vagrant-libvirt i386 Path: Labs/i386/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Vagrant-Rawhide-20190524.n.1.i386.vagrant-libvirt.box Image: Cloud_Base raw-xz s390x Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20190524.n.1.s390x.raw.xz Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree aarch64 Path: Silverblue/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-aarch64-Rawhide-20190524.n.1.iso Image: Python_Classroom raw-xz armhfp Path: Labs/armhfp/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-armhfp-Rawhide-20190524.n.1-sda.raw.xz Image: Cloud_Base qcow2 s390x Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20190524.n.1.s390x.qcow2 Image: Python_Classroom vagrant-virtualbox i386 Path: Labs/i386/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Vagrant-Rawhide-20190524.n.1.i386.vagrant-virtualbox.box Image: Cloud_Base vmdk s390x Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20190524.n.1.s390x.vmdk Image: LXDE live x86_64 Path: Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-LXDE-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20190524.n.1.iso Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Silverblue/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20190524.n.1.iso Image: LXDE live i386 Path: Spins/i386/iso/Fedora-LXDE-Live-i386-Rawhide-20190524.n.1.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: librealsense-2.21.0-1.module_f31+4383+13ff1bee Summary: Cross-platform camera capture for Intel RealSense RPMs:librealsense librealsense-devel librealsense-doc Size:43.55 MiB Package: remotely-1.0-1.fc31 Summary: Simple VNC viewer for the GNOME desktop environment RPMs:remotely Size:231.61 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: php-phpass-0.3-12.fc30 Summary: Portable password hashing framework for use in PHP applications RPMs:php-phpass Size:12.77 KiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: CImg-1:2.6.4-1.fc31 Old package: CImg-1:2.6.2-1.fc31 Summary: C++ Template Image Processing Toolkit RPMs: CImg-devel Size: 11.07 MiB Size change: 14.02 KiB Changelog: * Sat May 25 2019 josef radinger - 1:2.6.4-1 - bump version Package: R-gtable-0.3.0-1.fc31 Old package: R-gtable-0.2.0-3.fc30 Summary: Arrange 'Grobs' in Tables RPMs: R-gtable Size: 411.72 KiB Size change: 314.75 KiB Changelog: * Sun May 26 2019 Elliott Sales de Andrade - 0.3.0-1 - Update to latest version Package: R-nanotime-0.2.4-1.fc31 Old package: R-nanotime-0.2.3-2.fc30 Summary: Nanosecond-Resolution Time for R RPMs: R-nanotime Size: 122.35 KiB Size change: 176 B Changelog: * Sun May 26 2019 Elliott Sales de Andrade - 0.2.4-1 - Update to latest version Package: R-repr-1.0.1-1.fc31 Old package: R-repr-1.0.0-1.fc31 Summary: Serializable Representations RPMs: R-repr Size: 127.87 KiB Size change: -1.75 KiB Changelog: * Sun May 26 2019 Elliott Sales de Andrade - 1.0.1-1 - Update to latest version Package: R-reprex-0.3.0-1.fc31 Old package: R-reprex-0.2.1-2.fc30 Summary: Prepare Reproducible Example Code via the Clipboard RPMs: R-reprex Size: 430.00 KiB Size change: 23.91 KiB Changelog: * Sun May 26 2019 Elliott Sales de Andrade - 0.3.0-1 - Update to latest version Package: acpica-tools-20190509-4.fc31 Old package: acpica-tools-20190509-2.fc31 Summary: ACPICA tools for the development and debug of ACPI tables RPMs: acpica-tools Size: 5.88 MiB Size change: 1.10 KiB Changelog: * Sun May 26 2019 Peter Robinson 20190509-4 - Bump release for clean upgrade from F-29 Package: asv-0.4-1.fc31 Old package: asv-0.3.1-7.fc30 Summary: Airspeed Velocity: A simple Python history benchmarking tool RPMs: asv asv-doc Size: 7.15 MiB Size change: -6.81 KiB Package: balsa-2.5.7-1.fc31 Old package: balsa-2.5.6-4.fc30 Summary: Mail Client RPMs: balsa Size: 17.79 MiB Size change: 494.93 KiB Changelog: * Sat May 25 2019 Pawel Salek - 2.5.7-1 - Update to upstream balsa-2.5.7 Package: conspy-1.14-1.fc31 Old package: conspy-1.8-16.fc30 Summary: Remote control for text mode virtual consoles RPMs: conspy Size: 194.24 KiB Size change: 47.16 KiB
C++ help needed fixing VXL on 32 bit architectures
Hi everyone, After spending quite a bit of time fixing VXL to build, I've now run into errors with it building on 32 bit arches. Unfortunately, I don't foresee myself having enough cycles in the near future to debug the C++ bits to see what's happening here, and while I have filed a ticket upstream, they seem to be even busier than us (all issues seem to get a "A PR would be welcome" response) https://github.com/vxl/vxl/issues/638 Any chance any C++ ninjas here would have some time to look into this please? A PR fixing the issue upstream would be absolutely fantastic. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Planning on retiring alot and python-urwidtrees
Small update (well, actually big update :D).
No retirement is happening since python3-urwid{,trees} is also needed
for sen, which is my baby and I won't let it go.
Given all of that, I just updated python-urwid, python-urwidtrees and
alot to their latest upstream versions in rawhide and 30, feel free to
test the updates out. All of them are python 3 only.
Tomas
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 12:45 PM Tomas Tomecek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I packaged alot [1] for Fedora a long time ago. Alot is a terminal MUA
> built on top of notmuch. I stopped using it a year+ ago (OT: now I'm
> thinking of using neomutt).
>
> Given that, I'm planning to retire alot (and also python-urwidtrees
> which is a direct dep).
>
> The main problem here is that alot needs python-urwid [2] which is also
> retired.
>
> If anyone wants to step in, please let me know and I can transfer the
> ownership to you, otherwise, I'll retire it by the end of this week.
>
> Miro, thanks for heads-up.
>
> [1] https://github.com/pazz/alot
> [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-urwid
>
>
> Tomas
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Nonresponsive maintainer: salimma
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 3:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Once again, the same question. I have sent an email to Michel's gmail.com address. I will let you know if I get a reply. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Trouble logging into pagure.io
Hi, My FAS account is "submachine". I just tried logging into pagure.io, and while the login succeeded, immediately after, I got a 404 error page with the error 'No user "submachine" found'. All pagure.io URLs lead to the same 404, so I can't file a pagure issue for this either (which is why I'm writing to this list after a failed attempt at asking for help on #fedora-admin). How can this be fixed? Best Regards, Arjun ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unresponsive maintainer: mflobo
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 9:56 AM Matthias Runge wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 06:40:34PM +0200, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso wrote: > > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 9:37 AM Didier Fabert > > wrote: > > > > > Le 21/05/2019 à 15:13, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso a écrit : > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I've been trying to contact mflobo in order to get some packages > updated > > > > but didn't get any response: > > > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711394 > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711395 > > > > > > > > Output of fedora_active_user.py: > > I believe, I am Marcos sponsor; thus I went ahead and merged the PRs. > > Thanks. > IIRC, he moved on to something unrelated to OpenStack, thus I'd make > sense to at least grant commit access to the OpenStack related packages. > > Yeah, i'll follow unresponsive maintainer process to become owner of them. > Matthias > > -- > Matthias Runge > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Replacing glibc langpacks
Hi, On 27-05-19 14:49, Florian Weimer wrote: * Hans de Goede: Interesting idea, my first thoughts on this are that doing this during installation time feels wrong. How are you going to figure out for which languages to generate the locale data ? The language can differ per user. e.g. on my system the system language is nl_NL, for testing purposed, but I greatly prefer to have my apps in English, so for the hans user it is en_US. Today, you need to install multiple langpacks to cover this case. If we can detect the requested langpacks at %post time (or in a trigger), then we could mirror the current behavior. True (determine languages from installed langpacks), but that does not cover the anaconda and livecd cases. If we do this ondemand, we could also gain some space on the livecd. Thinking out loud here, if we go this route I think the data should be under say /var/cache/locale and be generated on demand. E.g. /var/cache/locale could be owned by a locale user/group and the binary to generate these files could be suid or sgid locale; then glibc could start this helper on demand if necessary. This would also remove the need to add some support / hack to anaconda for this. That looks a bit overengineered to me, and it would drive up installation size again. How would this driver up installation size, we need a tool for generating the data anyways and whether the files live under /usr/share/locale or under /var/cache/local does not change their size. We would also end up with diverging approaches for container images (where the D-Bus daemon might not even run) and other use cases. I admit that the on demand approach has issues for containers and atomic. Anyways if you go this route, I do have 2 requests: 1) Please put the files under /var/cache/local, we really need to stop putting generated files under /usr 2) Please use a trigger for generating the files rather then %post scripts, AFAIK we are working towards eliminating scripts as much as possible. Regards, Hans ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmlint warning: crypto-policy-non-compliance-gnutls-1
Anderson, FYI. Could you please answer the question below? On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 17:58 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > libnbd.x86_64: W: crypto-policy-non-compliance-gnutls-1 > > /usr/lib64/libnbd.so.0.0.0 gnutls_priority_set_direct > > This application package calls a function to explicitly set crypto > > ciphers for > > SSL/TLS. That may cause the application not to use the system-wide > > set > > cryptographic policy and should be modified in accordance to: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:CryptoPolicies > > The library does call gnutls_priority_set_direct, but in a way which > I > believe still uses the system policies: > > %prep > ./configure --with-tls-priority=@LIBNBD,SYSTEM > > sets ... > > #define TLS_PRIORITY "@LIBNBD,SYSTEM" > > which calls ... > > err = gnutls_priority_set_direct (session, TLS_PRIORITY, NULL); > > So we're good and we can ignore this warning, right? > > I should note that I copied this coding pattern from libvirt. > > Rich. -- Tomáš Mráz No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back. Turkish proverb [You'll know whether the road is wrong if you carefully listen to your conscience.] ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Replacing glibc langpacks
* Vít Ondruch: > Because Fedora is binary distribution, I think we should have everything > prebuilt and packaged. If we followed the path you propose, we would end > up with Gentoo. We do not pre-package the contents of /etc/ld.so.cache, either. And /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive in glibc-all-langpacks is generated at installation time, too. Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Replacing glibc langpacks
* Hans de Goede: > Interesting idea, my first thoughts on this are that doing this > during installation time feels wrong. How are you going to figure > out for which languages to generate the locale data ? The language > can differ per user. e.g. on my system the system language is nl_NL, > for testing purposed, but I greatly prefer to have my apps in English, > so for the hans user it is en_US. Today, you need to install multiple langpacks to cover this case. If we can detect the requested langpacks at %post time (or in a trigger), then we could mirror the current behavior. > Thinking out loud here, if we go this route I think the data should be > under say /var/cache/locale and be generated on demand. E.g. > /var/cache/locale could be owned by a locale user/group and the binary > to generate these files could be suid or sgid locale; then glibc could > start this helper on demand if necessary. This would also remove the > need to add some support / hack to anaconda for this. That looks a bit overengineered to me, and it would drive up installation size again. We would also end up with diverging approaches for container images (where the D-Bus daemon might not even run) and other use cases. Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Nonresponsive maintainer Frédéric Lepied (flepied)
Hey, I was told that Frédéric Lepied (flepied) has left Red Hat. His FAS account however only has a @redhat.com e-mail address. Any idea how to reach him? We'd like to have one of his two packages retired: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711724 Thanks, -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Replacing glibc langpacks
Because Fedora is binary distribution, I think we should have everything prebuilt and packaged. If we followed the path you propose, we would end up with Gentoo. Vít Dne 27. 05. 19 v 11:34 Florian Weimer napsal(a): > I'm investigating whether it makes sense to switch to a scheme where the > glibc locale data is built from source, during package installation, > based on the langpack configuration system. This is similar to what > Debian does. > > The reason is that the compressed locale source code (without the > charmaps, which are not strictly needed once we patch localedef) is > smaller than the subset of locales of a langpack package which people > actually. For example, glibc-langpack-en on Fedora 29 is 6.7 MiB when > installed, but en_US.utf8 is 2.9 MiB, and the locale sources are > 3.4 MiB, so even the common case realizes a small saving. > > For the installer, the savings might be much larger. If we can teach > anaconda to generate the appropriate locale only after the user has > selected the language, then we no longer need the full locale archive in > the installation image (and in RAM). > > Thanks, > Florian > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Node.js 12.x Plans for F31+
Dne 24. 05. 19 v 21:00 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 5:40 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> Today, the Node.js upstream released 12.0.0, the next in its line of >> long-term support releases. I plan to make this the default version of >> Node.js in Fedora 31+, but not immediately. I'm currently working on >> getting a modular version of 12.x built for F29, F30 and Rawhide. I'll >> get that out to updates-testing this week. I'll send out an update >> once it's pushed to updates-testing. >> >> Once that's available, I encourage all NPM packagers in Fedora to >> start testing their build and runtime with the 12.x module. I will be >> filing a Change Proposal and plan to switch the system interpreter for >> Rawhide over to 12.x around the end of May or beginning of June. >> >> The exact timing may depend on the current status of the >> modules-in-the-non-modular-buildroot work in Fedora. If that's >> available by this time, I will retire the non-modular Node.js >> interpreter package and make the 12.x module the default stream for >> F31+. If it's not available, I'll continue to do what I've been doing >> in F29 and F30; building both the modular and non-modular packages. >> >> If you discover that you own NPM packages that are critical and do not >> work with Node.js 12.x, please inform me immediately. We'll talk with >> upstream and see what we can do about it. > I plan to make this switch on Friday, May 31st, so if you have > packages that may break, now would be a good time to let me know. > > Since the buildroot work isn't yet completely ready, I'm going to take > the stop-gap approach and merge the '12' branch to master and do a > non-modular build of Node.js 12.x in Rawhide on that day. I might be missing something, but you promised "I will be filing a Change Proposal" in your original email above. Was it filled? Was it approved? Vít ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Replacing glibc langpacks
Hi, On 27-05-19 11:34, Florian Weimer wrote: I'm investigating whether it makes sense to switch to a scheme where the glibc locale data is built from source, during package installation, based on the langpack configuration system. This is similar to what Debian does. The reason is that the compressed locale source code (without the charmaps, which are not strictly needed once we patch localedef) is smaller than the subset of locales of a langpack package which people actually. For example, glibc-langpack-en on Fedora 29 is 6.7 MiB when installed, but en_US.utf8 is 2.9 MiB, and the locale sources are 3.4 MiB, so even the common case realizes a small saving. For the installer, the savings might be much larger. If we can teach anaconda to generate the appropriate locale only after the user has selected the language, then we no longer need the full locale archive in the installation image (and in RAM). Interesting idea, my first thoughts on this are that doing this during installation time feels wrong. How are you going to figure out for which languages to generate the locale data ? The language can differ per user. e.g. on my system the system language is nl_NL, for testing purposed, but I greatly prefer to have my apps in English, so for the hans user it is en_US. Even if you check the lang setting for all users during install time, it may change later at a per user level an new users may be added after install time. Thinking out loud here, if we go this route I think the data should be under say /var/cache/locale and be generated on demand. E.g. /var/cache/locale could be owned by a locale user/group and the binary to generate these files could be suid or sgid locale; then glibc could start this helper on demand if necessary. This would also remove the need to add some support / hack to anaconda for this. Regards, Hans p.s. An alternative to a suid/sgid helper would be a dbus activated service, with an idle timeout to make it stop after it has been unused for a while. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-devel] Re: On the command line tools ....
Hi William, I am not expert of CLI/UI so I would just comment as novice user. 389-ds 1.4, brings a brand new CLI/UI. To be less disruptive, the web UI reuse a lot the ideas of former java console. It allows fine tuning and shows some nasty internal details that in the future we may want to hide to make it more user friendly. UI using CLI, the CLI need to support those nasty details and UI relies low-level CLI I agree to create high-level CLI that will hide the complexity of 389-ds internals. But I do not feel it should be one or the other, we could have both and high-level CLI could be based on a robust set of low-level CLI. It is both too early and too late to change the CLI. Too early because 389-ds 1.4 is just out of the door and we have not yet feedback from users to know what should be imporve. It is too late because users will adopt this new CLI/UI, create their own scripts and we will need to be backward compatible. So IMHO there is only one way to go, fix the CLI bugs and extend the CLI set following your approach. Simon proposed an action plan (update design, review/agreement of the team, coding/deprecation) that looks quite good to me. best regards thierry On 5/27/19 2:12 AM, William Brown wrote: Of course, I am opened for the discussion on the plan and the vision. As Mark has pointed out, we should really gather here and decide as a team. :) Yeah, I think this is the important point. In the past I did not do well with this, so I think it's important we do it as a team. We really also should engage with people (but some mailing list feedback has already been positive though). Something to keep in mind, is that confusion about how a tool is used, is possibly a point of usability issue we could resolve. With a weekend of reflection, I think that Mark's suggestion of leaving what we have, and maybe adding a dstask or something in parallel may be the easiest way to achieve this with the least disruption. There is plenty on my plate for now, so I think there is no rush to make changes here ... Thank you all Regards, Simon — Sincerely, William Brown Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server SUSE Labs ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Modularity component ref: behavior
Ping. Any update here? Vít Dne 23. 04. 19 v 18:14 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > It is not mentioned anywhere in the official packager documentation, > but the modulemd format for packages includes a default[1] for the > `ref:` attribute of RPM components. Essentially, if you leave the > `ref:` out of the YAML, the Module Build Service will interpret that > as a reference to the HEAD of the `master` branch in the git > repository. > > Recently, Vit Ondruch raised a request[2] that we change this behavior > such that instead of matching `master`, it should instead reference > the HEAD of a branch of that component that matches a prefixed branch > of the module. > > So, for example, if we were building the `nodejs:10` module stream, if we had: > ``` > data: > ... > components: > nodejs: > rationale: Javascript runtime and npm package manager. > buildorder: 10 > ``` > (lacking a `ref:`) > > This would be interpreted as `ref: stream-nodejs-10` instead of `ref: > master`, as now. > > > In today's Modularity Working Group Meeting[3], those present > generally agreed that this was a better approach and lends itself to a > better packager experience. We did not, however, come to an agreement > on how to transition to this new default. > > There are two possible approaches we can take: > 1) Allow MBS to look first for the branch of the component matching > the module stream (`stream-nodejs-master`) and then fall back to > 'master'. > 2) Interrogate all of the modules in Fedora, migrate any components > missing a `ref:` explicitly to be `ref: master`, then change MBS to > treat the unset value as above. > > Arguments for 1) are that it won't break backwards-compatibility, but > on the other hand it could lead to subtle misbehavior, such as if MBS > did a shallow or otherwise incomplete `git clone` that misses the > proper branch. > > Arguments for 2) are that it lends itself to hard failures, forcing > packagers to correct their YAML documents, at the cost of some (as yet > unspecced) initial effort. > > > So I'm asking for opinions on which route we should take. > > > [1] > https://github.com/fedora-modularity/libmodulemd/blob/master/spec.v2.yaml#L270 > [2] https://github.com/fedora-modularity/libmodulemd/issues/269 > [3] > https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-3/2019-04-23/modularity.2019-04-23-15.01.log.html ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Replacing glibc langpacks
I'm investigating whether it makes sense to switch to a scheme where the glibc locale data is built from source, during package installation, based on the langpack configuration system. This is similar to what Debian does. The reason is that the compressed locale source code (without the charmaps, which are not strictly needed once we patch localedef) is smaller than the subset of locales of a langpack package which people actually. For example, glibc-langpack-en on Fedora 29 is 6.7 MiB when installed, but en_US.utf8 is 2.9 MiB, and the locale sources are 3.4 MiB, so even the common case realizes a small saving. For the installer, the savings might be much larger. If we can teach anaconda to generate the appropriate locale only after the user has selected the language, then we no longer need the full locale archive in the installation image (and in RAM). Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your package will be retired when the affected package gets retired. This report is online at: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2019-05-27.txt Packages retired today but still in this report: rubygem-sprite-factory Request package ownership via: https://pagure.io/releng/issues Package (co)maintainers Status Change aeskulap orphan 6 weeks ago apache-commons-discovery lkundrak, mizdebsk, orphan, 0 weeks ago spike ceph-deploy branto, fsimonce, ktdreyer, 3 weeks ago orphan, trhoden checkstyledbhole, greghellings, lef, 1 weeks ago mizdebsk, nsantos, orphan, rmyers clpbardcantrel, orphan 3 weeks ago cmdtest orphan 0 weeks ago compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helperorphan, rdieter 2 weeks ago dvdbackup cicku, orphan6 weeks ago emacs-pymacs orphan 6 weeks ago flr orphan 0 weeks ago genbackupdata orphan 0 weeks ago gnome-dvb-daemon orphan 6 weeks ago gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd orphan 6 weeks ago gnumed-server orphan 0 weeks ago gpart dcantrel, orphan 3 weeks ago gscribble orphan 0 weeks ago h2akurtakov, dchen, lef, orphan3 weeks ago jwebunit orphan 2 weeks ago kimchijcapik, orphan 0 weeks ago librtfcomporphan 0 weeks ago loopabull orphan 0 weeks ago lrbd orphan 0 weeks ago ltspfsenslaver, orphan 5 weeks ago monkeysphere ctubbsii, orphan 1 weeks ago ninja-ide echevemaster, orphan 5 weeks ago nodejs-array-uniq nodejs-sig, orphan 0 weeks ago pdc-updater orphan 0 weeks ago plaguedcbw, orphan 4 weeks ago pyqt-mail-checker orphan 0 weeks ago python-cachy orphan 1 weeks ago python-larch orphan 0 weeks ago python-mandrill orphan 0 weeks ago python-psphereimcleod, orphan 0 weeks ago python-pylev orphan 1 weeks ago python-pytest-testmon orphan, python-sig 1 weeks ago pywebkitgtk ivazquez, orphan, walters5 weeks ago repoview orphan 0 weeks ago rubygem-chunky_pngmmorsi, orphan 6 weeks ago rubygem-codemirror-rails orphan 5 weeks ago rubygem-commander maxamillion, orphan, tdawson 3 weeks ago rubygem-compass-960-pluginorphan 6 weeks ago rubygem-jquery-ui-rails orphan 3 weeks ago rubygem-paranoia orphan 2 weeks ago rubygem-sprite-factory * orphan 7 weeks ago rubygem-webratmmorsi, orphan 6 weeks ago system-config-firewallorphan, twoerner 3 weeks ago testoob orphan 2 weeks ago totpcgi herlo, kevin, orphan 0 weeks ago transmission-remote-cli orphan
[Bug 1714152] New: perl-SVG-TT-Graph-1.01 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714152 Bug ID: 1714152 Summary: perl-SVG-TT-Graph-1.01 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-SVG-TT-Graph Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: emman...@seyman.fr, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.01 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.00-1.fc31 URL: https://metacpan.org/release/SVG-TT-Graph Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/17952/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Nonresponsive maintainer: salimma
On 23. 06. 18 13:38, Miro Hrončok wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589077 Does anyone know how to contact the maintainer? Once again, the same question. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Intent to drop python2-tornado
On 20. 05. 19 11:26, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I intend to drop python2-tornado. There are following dependent packages:
- python-httpretty
build time, for Python 2 tests, tests can be disabled
- python-pika
build time, for Python 2 tests, one file can be skipped
- python-urllib3
build time, for Python 2 tests, tests can be disabled
- salt (and salt-{api,cloud,syndic,ssh,master,minion})
runtime, python 3 switch is blocked by a fixable bug
https://github.com/saltstack/salt/issues/51883
salt is not required by anything
- uwsgi-plugin-python2-tornado (from uwsgi)
runtime, but not required by anything
- bup and bup-web
runtime and buildtime, but not required by anything
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F31_Mass_Python_2_Package_Removal#Removing_Python_2_parts
7 days have passed.
$ repoquery --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires python2-tornado
bup-0:0.29.2-3.fc30.src
bup-web-0:0.29.2-3.fc30.x86_64
python-httpretty-0:0.9.5-5.fc30.src
python-pika-0:1.0.1-1.fc31.src
python-urllib3-0:1.24.2-1.fc31.src
salt-0:2019.2.0-1.fc31.noarch
uwsgi-plugin-python2-tornado-0:2.0.17.1-10.fc31.x86_64
If anybody wants to package python2-tornado before we drop it, let me know in 2
weeks.
Reasons below:
Forwarded Message
Subject: Let's update tornado to 6 and drop python2-torando
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 16:57:57 +0200
From: Miro Hrončok
Reply-To: Fedora Python SIG
Organisation: Red Hat
To: Fedora Python SIG ,
abomp...@fedoraproject.org, or...@fedoraproject.org, toms...@fedoraproject.org
Hi.
Tornado 6 doesn't support Python 2. Let's update the python-torando package to
Python 3 only. There are several consumers of python2-torando and if their
maintainers are interested, they can package it separately.
$ dnf repoquery --repo=compose{,-source} --whatrequires python2-tornado
bup-0:0.29.2-3.fc30.src
bup-web-0:0.29.2-3.fc30.x86_64
python-httpretty-0:0.9.5-5.fc30.src
python-pika-0:1.0.1-1.fc31.src
python-urllib3-0:1.24.2-1.fc31.src
salt-0:2019.2.0-1.fc31.noarch
uwsgi-plugin-python2-tornado-0:2.0.17.1-10.fc31.x86_64
Note that tornado is often used to test things. We can (and should) just skip
such tests from Python 2 httpretty, pika and urllib3.
Is the plan OK? I'll talk to the dependent packages maintainers, but wanted to
check with torando co-maintainers first.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unresponsive maintainer: mflobo
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 06:40:34PM +0200, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 9:37 AM Didier Fabert > wrote: > > > Le 21/05/2019 à 15:13, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso a écrit : > > > Hello, > > > > > > I've been trying to contact mflobo in order to get some packages updated > > > but didn't get any response: > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711394 > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711395 > > > > > > Output of fedora_active_user.py: I believe, I am Marcos sponsor; thus I went ahead and merged the PRs. IIRC, he moved on to something unrelated to OpenStack, thus I'd make sense to at least grant commit access to the OpenStack related packages. Matthias -- Matthias Runge ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1712795] Upgrade perl-Config-Model-TkUI to 1.370
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712795 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Config-Model-TkUI-1.37 ||0-1.fc31 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2019-05-27 07:34:09 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1713911] perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.065 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713911 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.065-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ab40840fa8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1708964] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.00 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708964 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ae8a88278d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1713815] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713815 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ae8a88278d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1712905] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.04 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712905 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ae8a88278d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1711460] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.02 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711460 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ae8a88278d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1713815] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713815 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0fefa5ba85 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1708964] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.00 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708964 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0fefa5ba85 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1711460] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.02 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711460 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0fefa5ba85 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1712905] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.04 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712905 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0fefa5ba85 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1712905] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.04 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712905 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0576b2a1f3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1713911] perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.065 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713911 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.065-1.fc ||31 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- A bug-fix release suitable for Fedora ≥ 30. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1711460] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.02 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711460 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0576b2a1f3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1708964] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.00 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708964 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0576b2a1f3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1713815] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713815 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0576b2a1f3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1713815] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.06 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713815 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.0 ||6-1.fc31 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1713805] perl-SQL-Shell-1.17 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713805 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-SQL-Shell-1.17-1.fc31 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2019-05-27 06:55:38 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- A bug-fix release suitable for Fedora ≥ 31. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1712909] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190522 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712909 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190524-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-d0f1498935 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1713817] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190524 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713817 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190524-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-d0f1498935 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1712909] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190522 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712909 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190524-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2304aab011 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1713817] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190524 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713817 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190524-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2304aab011 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1712909] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190522 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712909 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190524-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-5887d3e6d6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1713817] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190524 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713817 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190524-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-5887d3e6d6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1713920] perl-XML-LibXML-2.0201 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713920 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-XML-LibXML-2.0201-1.fc ||31 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2019-05-27 06:51:33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1713817] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190524 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713817 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-Module-CoreList-5.2019 ||0524-1.fc31 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- An enhancement release suitable for all Fedoras. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
