new pkgtreediff tool

2019-06-09 Thread Jens-Ulrik Petersen
Hi, I made a little tool called pkgtreediff to compare package trees
(directories of rpm files).
See https://github.com/juhp/pkgtreediff#readme for more details.
I hope some people here may find it useful.

Fedora and Epel7 builds are available in <
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/pkgtreediff/>.

Feedback and suggestions are welcome (particularly other than "why did you
write in Haskell again?";-)

Thanks, Jens
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-06-10 - 95% PASS

2019-06-09 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/06/10/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.3-20190609git3ca307d.fc30.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2019-06-09 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 299  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d   
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
 107  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f8311ec8a2   
tor-0.3.5.8-1.el7
  74  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-d2c1368294   
cinnamon-3.6.7-5.el7
  67  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-50a6a1ddfd   
afflib-3.7.18-2.el7
  40  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c499781e80   
python-gnupg-0.4.4-1.el7
  38  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-bc0182548b   
bubblewrap-0.3.3-2.el7
  15  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-9cab93353c   
drupal7-ds-2.16-1.el7
  15  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-2c1ec539fd   
drupal7-uuid-1.2-1.el7
  15  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f614c9a4bc   
drupal7-xmlsitemap-2.6-1.el7
  15  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-8278894e4d   
drupal7-context-3.10-1.el7
  15  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-de5e3216ff   
drupal7-path_breadcrumbs-3.4-1.el7
  15  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-748b40598c   
drupal7-module_filter-2.2-1.el7
  15  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-53f9189a5e   
drupal7-views-3.23-1.el7
  15  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-043371cfab   
rust-1.35.0-1.el7
  10  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-fc63c75ab1   
hostapd-2.8-1.el7
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-58a16a4811   
python-django-1.11.21-1.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

ansible-2.8.1-1.el7
asdcplib-2.10.32-3.el7
zimg-2.8-3.el7

Details about builds:



 ansible-2.8.1-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-8b0a066052)
 SSH-based configuration management, deployment, and task execution system

Update Information:

Update to 2.8.1 bugfix release.  Sync up dependencies from upstream.  Fix
CVE-2019-10156

ChangeLog:

* Sun Jun  9 2019 Kevin Fenzi  - 2.8.1-1
- Update to 2.8.1. Fixes bug #1718131
- Sync up Requires/Buildrequires with upstream.
- Add patch for python 3.8 building. Fixes bug #1712531
- Add patch for CVE-2019-10156.

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1717312 - CVE-2019-10156 ansible: unsafe template evaluation of 
returned module data can lead to information disclosure [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1717312
  [ 2 ] Bug #1718131 - ansible-2.8.1 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718131




 asdcplib-2.10.32-3.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f311a442f2)
 AS-DCP file access libraries

Update Information:

New asdcplib library.

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1713852 - Review Request: asdcplib - AS-DCP file access libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713852




 zimg-2.8-3.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-dbbd42f2ec)
 Scaling, color space conversion, and dithering library

Update Information:

New library.

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1713851 - Review Request: zimg - Scaling, color space conversion, 
and dithering library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713851


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Procedure to get keytable included in official console and X and wayland keytables.

2019-06-09 Thread stan via devel
I use a custom keymapping that I developed to save my hands, and
because it is very efficient.  It's strength is that the most used keys
are under the strongest fingers, and that for my typing about 80% of
what I type is on the home row.  

The problem is that whenever I have issues with my system, it reverts
to qwerty, and I have to hunt and peck to do things.  If it was
official, this wouldn't be a problem, because I could just select it,
the same as one can select dvorak or colemak.  Unlike those, I really
rearranged the keys for efficiency, and there are only 2 or 3 keys the
same as qwerty.  I used to use qwerty as a touch typist, and I suppose
I could learn to switch back and forth, but qwerty is just so clumsy,
and my hands don't like it.

Does anyone know how I would go about getting my keytable, which I
call uneaf after the left home row, included? Is there an official
procedure, or is it just a submission with a request to a programmer
somewhere.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: How to consume fedora-messaging?

2019-06-09 Thread Tristan Cacqueray

On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 01:24 Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been trying to write some script which would listen on
> generation of new repository / successful build is tagged in Koji and
> do some actions locally. Or basically whenever someone pushes commits,
> I want to fetch repo locally.
>
> I was reading 
> https://fedora-messaging.readthedocs.io/en/latest/consuming.html,
> but it is not very clear to me where I can find list of topics and
> what data messages will contain...
>

Hi Igor,

you can find the list of topics and their associated schema here:
https://fedora-fedmsg.readthedocs.io/en/latest/topics.html

And you can also find samples on this website:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/datagrepper/raw


> Bonus point who can tell me how does it know which messages should be
> re-queued and how to manipulate that.
>

It doesn't seems like you have to worry about re-queue when consuming
the bus.

Regards,
-Tristan


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


How to consume fedora-messaging?

2019-06-09 Thread Igor Gnatenko
Hello,

I have been trying to write some script which would listen on
generation of new repository / successful build is tagged in Koji and
do some actions locally. Or basically whenever someone pushes commits,
I want to fetch repo locally.

I was reading https://fedora-messaging.readthedocs.io/en/latest/consuming.html,
but it is not very clear to me where I can find list of topics and
what data messages will contain...

Bonus point who can tell me how does it know which messages should be
re-queued and how to manipulate that.

Thanks!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Do people not care about broken dependencies?

2019-06-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019, 19:59 Igor Gnatenko 
wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 7:03 PM Fabio Valentini 
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 9, 2019, 18:06 Igor Gnatenko <
> ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I've noticed that people keep pushing updates which have broken
> dependencies.
> >>
> >> For example, python-kombu was updated from 4.6.0 to 4.6.1. Both of
> >> those versions have broken dependency "python3.7dist(amqp) >= 2.5.0 ".
> >> However, it was built both for F30 and F31 and even submitted to
> >> bodhi.
> >>
> >> I have more examples…
> >
> >
> > Hi Igor,
> >
> > I have some additional examples of this as well. I think this is most
> often caused by automatically generated unsatisfied dependencies of binary
> packages - which don't break the build, but make the package uninstallable.
>
> If you mean Rust ones, those are intentional because we do not indent
> to ship them to the users... However, we need to build them somewhere.
>

No, I didn't attempt to be passive-aggressive here ;) My issues were caused
by python package updates, as well.


> But yeah, people just don't notice this.
>
> > Fabio
> >
> >> ___
> >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> >> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >
> > ___
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Do people not care about broken dependencies?

2019-06-09 Thread Igor Gnatenko
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 7:03 PM Fabio Valentini  wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2019, 18:06 Igor Gnatenko  
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've noticed that people keep pushing updates which have broken dependencies.
>>
>> For example, python-kombu was updated from 4.6.0 to 4.6.1. Both of
>> those versions have broken dependency "python3.7dist(amqp) >= 2.5.0 ".
>> However, it was built both for F30 and F31 and even submitted to
>> bodhi.
>>
>> I have more examples…
>
>
> Hi Igor,
>
> I have some additional examples of this as well. I think this is most often 
> caused by automatically generated unsatisfied dependencies of binary packages 
> - which don't break the build, but make the package uninstallable.

If you mean Rust ones, those are intentional because we do not indent
to ship them to the users... However, we need to build them somewhere.

But yeah, people just don't notice this.

> Fabio
>
>> ___
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives: 
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2019-06-10 Fedora QA Meeting

2019-06-09 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow. I don't have
anything urgent for the agenda. If you're aware of anything important
we have to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail and we can
go ahead and run the meeting.

Thanks, everyone!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Do people not care about broken dependencies?

2019-06-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019, 18:06 Igor Gnatenko 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I've noticed that people keep pushing updates which have broken
> dependencies.
>
> For example, python-kombu was updated from 4.6.0 to 4.6.1. Both of
> those versions have broken dependency "python3.7dist(amqp) >= 2.5.0 ".
> However, it was built both for F30 and F31 and even submitted to
> bodhi.
>
> I have more examples…
>

Hi Igor,

I have some additional examples of this as well. I think this is most often
caused by automatically generated unsatisfied dependencies of binary
packages - which don't break the build, but make the package uninstallable.

Fabio

___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Do people not care about broken dependencies?

2019-06-09 Thread Brian (bex) Exelbierd
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 5:18 PM Igor Gnatenko
 wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed that people keep pushing updates which have broken dependencies.
>
> For example, python-kombu was updated from 4.6.0 to 4.6.1. Both of
> those versions have broken dependency "python3.7dist(amqp) >= 2.5.0 ".
> However, it was built both for F30 and F31 and even submitted to
> bodhi.

This looks like a low-hanging fruit job for CI Gating - if the package
can't be installed, gate it, barring override.

regards,

bex

>
> I have more examples…
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



-- 
Brian "bex" Exelbierd (he/him/his)
Fedora Community Action & Impact Coordinator
@bexelbie | http://www.winglemeyer.org
bexel...@redhat.com | b...@pobox.com
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Do people not care about broken dependencies?

2019-06-09 Thread Igor Gnatenko
Hello,

I've noticed that people keep pushing updates which have broken dependencies.

For example, python-kombu was updated from 4.6.0 to 4.6.1. Both of
those versions have broken dependency "python3.7dist(amqp) >= 2.5.0 ".
However, it was built both for F30 and F31 and even submitted to
bodhi.

I have more examples…
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Tagging commit hashes of Koji builds in dist-git

2019-06-09 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 02:07:18PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 7:11 AM Neal Gompa  wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 7:53 AM Florian Weimer  wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there a reason why we do not tag dist-git commits, using a name which
> > > is derived from the NEVR from a Koji build?
> > >
> > > How well does Git scale with thousands of tags?
> > >
> >
> > We used to back in the CVS days, because we needed it for plague. Koji
> > blocks duplicate submissions anyway, so it stopped being needed when
> > we transitioned to Git.
> 
> it was not plague that needed it, using tags was the only way to
> cjeckout the intended output, they had the problem that they were not
> immutable, if you made a typo you forced in a new tag so you did not
> need to bump the nvr
> 
> > We're going to probably introduce it for some automation in the near
> > future, though.
> >
> > Git is not great with thousands of any kind of refs, be it branches or
> > tags. It still works, it's just things like 'git log' get kind of
> > expensive.
> 
> koji stores the git hash for all builds, writing a script to get the
> hash for a given nvr would be trivial. it just means you have to be
> online to retrieve the data than being able to get the date while
> disconnected, if it was stored in git.

I'd also point out that the link is also made in pagure, for example: 
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kernel/c/ead55fdbc7606e96fb1436249e4d121c5119218b?branch=master

Basically, we listen for koji build results and "flag" the commit which was used
for the build with the outcome (success/failure) of the build.
Here is another example who both succeeded and failed to build in koji:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/0ad/c/d43ffc4721e7c5d6af33e9bc26b739ec6802cb76?branch=master

If this needs to be made more easily discoverable via the API, we can adjust
pagure for this.


Pierre
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1718129] perl-DBIx-Class-DeploymentHandler-0.002232 is available

2019-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718129

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-DBIx-Class-DeploymentH
   ||andler-0.002232-1.fc31
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2019-06-09 10:05:01



--- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman  ---
Built for rawhide:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1283073

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org