Duplicate speedtest-cli packages in the repo.

2019-06-29 Thread Leigh Scott
speedtest-cli and python3-speedtest-cli appear to be the same package.


Downloading Packages:
python3-speedtest-cli-1.0.2-7.fc30.noarch.rpm   364 kB/s |  44 kB 00:00

Total64 kB/s |  44 kB 00:00 
Running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful 
transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
Error: Transaction check error:
  file /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/speedtest.py from install of 
python3-speedtest-cli-1.0.2-7.fc30.noarch conflicts with file from package 
speedtest-cli-1.0.2-6.fc30.noarch
  file /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/speedtest_cli.py from install of 
python3-speedtest-cli-1.0.2-7.fc30.noarch conflicts with file from package 
speedtest-cli-1.0.2-6.fc30.noarch
  file /usr/share/man/man1/speedtest-cli.1.gz from install of 
python3-speedtest-cli-1.0.2-7.fc30.noarch conflicts with file from package 
speedtest-cli-1.0.2-6.fc30.noarch

Error Summary
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-06-30 - 94% PASS

2019-06-29 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/06/30/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.4-20190629git9bf0fc2.fc30.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1725351] New: perl-PDF-API2-2.034 is available

2019-06-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725351

Bug ID: 1725351
   Summary: perl-PDF-API2-2.034 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-PDF-API2
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 2.034
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.033-8.fc31
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PDF-API2/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3202/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1725350] perl-Finance-Quote-1.48 is available

2019-06-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725350



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1585941
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1585941=edit
[patch] Update to 1.48 (#1725350)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1725350] New: perl-Finance-Quote-1.48 is available

2019-06-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725350

Bug ID: 1725350
   Summary: perl-Finance-Quote-1.48 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Finance-Quote
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: nott...@splat.cc
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@splat.cc, p...@city-fan.org,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 1.48
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.47-6.fc31
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Finance-Quote

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/6888/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2019-06-29 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 319  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d   
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
  94  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-d2c1368294   
cinnamon-3.6.7-5.el7
  87  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-50a6a1ddfd   
afflib-3.7.18-2.el7
  60  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c499781e80   
python-gnupg-0.4.4-1.el7
  58  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-bc0182548b   
bubblewrap-0.3.3-2.el7
  30  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-fc63c75ab1   
hostapd-2.8-1.el7
  12  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-24edff97c6   
php-brumann-polyfill-unserialize-1.0.3-1.el7 
php-typo3-phar-stream-wrapper2-2.1.2-1.el7
  12  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f428efb17c   
drupal7-uuid-1.3-1.el7
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-193cafec2e   
GraphicsMagick-1.3.32-1.el7
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-7a3942050d   
nodejs-6.17.1-1.el7
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-a7d80aae2a   
pdns-4.1.10-1.el7
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-b94f559810   
chromium-75.0.3770.100-2.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

SuperLUMT-3.1.0-21.el7
digitemp-3.7.2-1.el7
epel-rpm-macros-7-20
fldigi-4.1.04-1.el7
lynis-2.7.5-1.el7
petsc-3.10.4-1.el7
petsc4py-3.10.1-1.el7
sundials-4.1.0-3.el7

Details about builds:



 SuperLUMT-3.1.0-21.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-1a18c3e4c6)
 Single precision real SuperLU routines for shared memory parallel machines

Update Information:

- Updates to PETSc-3.10.4 - Update to petsc4py-3.10.1 - Update to sundials-4.1.0

ChangeLog:

* Sat Jun 29 2019 Antonio Trande  - 3.1.0-21
- Use devtoolset-8 on epel
- Downgrading Make's jobs
* Tue Feb 19 2019 Antonio Trande  - 3.1.0-20
- Use openblas always
* Thu Jan 31 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
3.1.0-19
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild
* Thu Aug 23 2018 Peter Robinson  3.1.0-18
- Drop group
- Build on all arches
* Thu Jul 12 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
3.1.0-17
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild
* Wed Feb 21 2018 Antonio Trande  - 3.1.0-16
- Add gcc BR
* Thu Feb 15 2018 Antonio Trande  - 3.1.0-15
- Use %ldconfig_scriptlets
* Wed Feb  7 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
3.1.0-14
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild




 digitemp-3.7.2-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-124b149be5)
 Dallas Semiconductor 1-wire device reading console application

Update Information:

DigiTemp 3.7.2 ==* Fix `digitemp.spec` Version in bumpver target
(bcl)   * Make sure strncpy uses are null-terminated (bcl)   * Add a check for
ROM number vs. SENSORS count (bcl)   * Log the scratchpad diagnostics (bcl)   *
Bump Copyright Year to 2018 (bcl)   * Fix strftime use of log_file (bcl)   * Add
strftime formating to logfile name (peje)   * Clean up the start_time switch
statement usage (bcl)   * Add log_type 4 & 5 (peje)   * Check for bad
Get_Temperature result (bcl)   * Fix the return value of Get_Temperature in
`ad26.c` (bcl)   * Display DS2438 temperature even if humidity calculation
fails. (bcl)   * Always include `types.h` and `time.h` (bcl)   * Bump copyright
year to 2016 (bcl)   * Add bumpver target (bcl)   * Spelling corrections (ryan)
DigiTemp 3.7.1 ==* Fix version in digitemp.h (bcl)   DigiTemp
3.7.0 ==* Update the rpm spec and drop CFLAG patch (bcl)   *
Allow CFLAGS to be overridden (bcl)   * Add git tag and archive creation to
Makefile (bcl)   * Update `TODO` list (bcl)   * Remove old python GUI code (bcl)
* Recognize DS2401 variant family 0x81 in DS9490R/DS9490B (ryan)   * Remove
lockfile mentions from `README` (ryan)   * Misc. cleanup and date bumping. (bcl)
* Fix some unused variables found by cppcheck (bcl)   * Fix potential resource
leak in read_rcfile (bcl)   * Update Copyright date to 2015 (bcl)   * Fix typo
(bcl)   * Increase size limit for TTY device names (inguin)   * Clear the usb
buffer before use (bcl)   * Tell git to ignore `.o` files (bcl)   * Platform
adjustments (ryan)   * Properly reset the 1-Wire bus on DS2490 (patrick)   * Fix
SetBaudCOM conflicting parameter types (ryan)   * Replace lockdev usage with
flock (ryan)   * Makefile 

Fedora Rawhide-20190629.n.0 compose check report

2019-06-29 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images.

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 47 required tests failed, 3 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** 
below

Failed openQA tests: 9/145 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test not failed in Rawhide-20190628.n.0):

ID: 416961  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/416961
ID: 417009  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417009
ID: 417013  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417013
ID: 417087  Test: x86_64 universal install_ext3@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417087

Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20190628.n.0):

ID: 416973  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/416973
ID: 416992  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/416992
ID: 417016  Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417016
ID: 417019  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417019
ID: 417046  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417046
ID: 417047  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417047

Soft failed openQA tests: 4/145 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Rawhide-20190628.n.0):

ID: 416967  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/416967

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Rawhide-20190628.n.0):

ID: 416976  Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/416976
ID: 416977  Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/416977
ID: 416988  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/416988
ID: 416995  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/416995
ID: 416996  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/416996
ID: 416999  Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/416999

Passed openQA tests: 127/145 (x86_64), 21/24 (i386)

New passes (same test not passed in Rawhide-20190628.n.0):

ID: 417001  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417001
ID: 417002  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417002
ID: 417003  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417003
ID: 417004  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_selinux
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417004
ID: 417005  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417005
ID: 417006  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_service_manipulation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417006
ID: 417007  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_update_cli
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417007
ID: 417008  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_system_logging
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417008
ID: 417010  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_terminal
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417010
ID: 417011  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417011
ID: 417012  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417012
ID: 417014  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417014
ID: 417015  Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417015
ID: 417065  Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417065
ID: 417081  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417081
ID: 417096  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417096
ID: 417115  Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/417115

Skipped gating openQA tests: 3/145 (x86_64)

New skipped gating tests (same test not skipped in Rawhide-20190628.n.0):

ID: 416959  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_role_deploy_domain_controller **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/416959
ID: 416960  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso 

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190629.n.0 changes

2019-06-29 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190628.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190629.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images:  7
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages:   136
Downgraded packages: 1

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:712.78 KiB
Size of upgraded packages:   6.49 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 11.39 MiB

Size change of upgraded packages:   781.29 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: -11.03 MiB

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Container_Base docker s390x
Path: 
Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20190629.n.0.s390x.tar.xz
Image: Cloud_Base vmdk s390x
Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20190629.n.0.s390x.vmdk
Image: Design_suite live i386
Path: Labs/i386/iso/Fedora-Design_suite-Live-i386-Rawhide-20190629.n.0.iso
Image: Cloud_Base qcow2 s390x
Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20190629.n.0.s390x.qcow2
Image: Cloud_Base raw-xz s390x
Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20190629.n.0.s390x.raw.xz

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: KDE raw-xz armhfp
Path: Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-KDE-armhfp-Rawhide-20190628.n.0-sda.raw.xz
Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree ppc64le
Path: 
Silverblue/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-ppc64le-Rawhide-20190628.n.0.iso
Image: LXDE live i386
Path: Spins/i386/iso/Fedora-LXDE-Live-i386-Rawhide-20190628.n.0.iso
Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree aarch64
Path: 
Silverblue/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-aarch64-Rawhide-20190628.n.0.iso
Image: Python_Classroom vagrant-virtualbox x86_64
Path: 
Labs/x86_64/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Vagrant-Rawhide-20190628.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box
Image: LXDE live x86_64
Path: Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-LXDE-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20190628.n.0.iso
Image: Python_Classroom vagrant-libvirt x86_64
Path: 
Labs/x86_64/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Vagrant-Rawhide-20190628.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-libvirt.box

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: system-config-firewall-1.2.29-21.fc29
Summary: A graphical interface for basic firewall setup
RPMs:system-config-firewall system-config-firewall-base 
system-config-firewall-tui
Size:478.75 KiB

Package: the-new-hotness-0.10.0-5.fc30
Summary: Consume Anitya fedmsg messages to file bugzilla bugs
RPMs:the-new-hotness the-new-hotness-doc
Size:234.02 KiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  apron-0.9.11-25.1104.svn20180624.fc31
Old package:  apron-0.9.11-23.1104.svn20180624.fc30
Summary:  Numerical abstract domain library
RPMs: apron apron-devel japron ocaml-apron ocaml-apron-devel
Size: 22.32 MiB
Size change:  422.99 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Apr 29 2019 Richard W.M. Jones  - 
0.9.11-24.1104.svn20180624
  - OCaml 4.08.0 (beta 3) rebuild.

  * Thu Jun 27 2019 Richard W.M. Jones  - 
0.9.11-25.1104.svn20180624
  - OCaml 4.08.0 (final) rebuild.


Package:  brltty-6.0-4.fc31
Old package:  brltty-5.6-32.fc30
Summary:  Braille display driver for Linux/Unix
RPMs: brlapi brlapi-devel brlapi-java brltty brltty-at-spi2 brltty-docs 
brltty-dracut brltty-espeak brltty-espeak-ng brltty-speech-dispatcher brltty-xw 
ocaml-brlapi python3-brlapi tcl-brlapi
Size: 13.63 MiB
Size change:  1.52 MiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Apr 29 2019 Richard W.M. Jones  - 6.0-2
  - OCaml 4.08.0 (beta 3) rebuild.

  * Fri Jun 07 2019 Jaroslav ??karvada  - 6.0-3
  - Fixed build with alsa-1.1.9
Resolves: rhbz#1716389

  * Thu Jun 27 2019 Richard W.M. Jones  - 6.0-4
  - OCaml 4.08.0 (final) rebuild.


Package:  coin-or-Alps-1.5.7-1.fc31
Old package:  coin-or-Alps-1.5.5-9.fc30
Summary:  COIN-OR High-Performance Parallel Search Framework
RPMs: coin-or-Alps coin-or-Alps-devel coin-or-Alps-doc
Size: 7.24 MiB
Size change:  1.08 MiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Jun 27 2019 Jerry James  - 1.5.7-1
  - Update to latest 1.5.x upstream release (bz 1413567)
  - Update URLs
  - Change License from EPL to EPL-1.0
  - Eliminate unnecessary BRs and Rs
  - Eliminate rpath from the library
  - Force libtool to not defeat -Wl,--as-needed
  - Be explicit about library versions as required by latest guidelines
  - Package doxygen tag file to enable cross-linking


Package:  coin-or-Bcp-1.4.4-1.fc31
Old package:  coin-or-Bcp-1.4.3-9.fc30
Summary:  Branch-Cut-Price Framework
RPMs: coin-or-Bcp coin-or-Bcp-devel coin-or-Bcp-doc
Added RPMs:   coin-or-Bcp-doc
Size: 17.25 MiB
Size change:  15.41 MiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Jun 27 2019 Jerry James  - 1.4.4-1
  - Update to latest upstream release
  - Eliminate unnecessary BRs and Rs
  - Eliminate rpath from the library
  - Force libtool to not defeat -Wl,--as-needed
  - Be explicit about library versions as required by latest guidelines
  - Filter out unnecessary Libs values from pkgconfig files
  - Add -doc subpackage; run doxygen


Package:  coin-or-Bcps-0.94.5-1.fc31
Old package:  coin-or-Bcps-0.94.4-9.fc30
Summary:  Part of the COIN High Performance Parallel Search

Re: always update the bootloader during major upgrades

2019-06-29 Thread Richard Shaw
I don't have the technical expertise in this area to comment on the details
of the implementation, but from a dumb user point of view, could there be a
simple or no-payload package that says "Fedora owns the bootloader" that's
installed by default and power users that wish to maintain it themselves
(or use other bootloaders) and remove the package?

Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Possibly Unresponsive Maintainer: dchen

2019-06-29 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi,

I've been working through the backlog of Java packages / updates that
are pending for the Stewardship SIG packages, and found that dchen
seems to have stopped contributing to fedora in August 2018.

- no responses bugzilla issues assigned to him since then [0],
including CVEs and nagging FTBFS issues and needinfos
- no koji builds since then [1]
- no bodhi activity since then [2]

Looking at BugZilla comments, it seems like he stopped working at Red
Hat around the time his contributions to fedora stopped. The only
activity I could find since August 2018 was one pull request on
src-fp-org [3].

Does anybody know if he is still an an active fedora contributor, or
why he hasn't responded to any bug reports in the last 10 months?

If there's no positive information during the next week, I will open a
FESCo ticket according to the Non-responsive Maintainer policy.

Thanks,
Fabio


[0]: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open___status=__closed__=Fedora=dingyichen%40gmail.com_to1=1=substring_id=10299757=Fedora_format=advanced

[1]: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=465

[2]: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/users/dchen

[3]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/keepass/pull-request/3
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


ODP: adding speech installation to fedora network installation image

2019-06-29 Thread Mmobilea
It should be included orca, and speech dispatcher. I can be a tester of this 
image.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: New Go Packaging Guidelines landed in rawhide (koji) today

2019-06-29 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Hi,

> What should I do at this moment as a packager that maintaining some
> Go packages?
> Should I fix my packages and build against f31-go in Koji?

Yes, sure, if you can that would be appreciated. The vast majority of
packages is easy to clean up (just adapt the templates in go-rpm-
templates or use go2rpm), it's just there is an awful lot of them, so
Robert-André Mauchin (eclipseo) can not do all of them in a single
pass.

If you hit one of the cases where a project needs weird stuff, or if
you do not understand something, there is help available here and in
the #fedora-golang channel.

Please just state here (or tell eclispeo directly) what you will
convert, so you do not end up doing the same work in parallel.

Quite often, eclipseo will have prepared things in his copr, just not
built them in koji yet.
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/eclipseo/golang-ng/

So taking up from where he prepared, and checking the result builds in
koji and works for you, will accelerate things.

@eclipseo: please correct if I wrote something that does not make
things easier your side

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: always update the bootloader during major upgrades

2019-06-29 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le vendredi 28 juin 2019 à 18:49 -0600, Chris Murphy a écrit :
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019, 1:19 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel
>  wrote:
> > Le jeudi 27 juin 2019 à 12:26 -0600, Chris Murphy a écrit :
> > > Yep, small problem. And I'm not even sure how a 'grub2-install'
> > > on
> > > BIOS systems would be initiated only at major upgrade time. But
> > > even
> > > Fedora Rawhide does change versions when fcXX becomes fcXX+1, but
> > > is
> > > that a sane trigger?
> > 
> > It's not, such magic “it's FCX time” break all the time for users
> > that
> > only do dnf update, or use rawhide (which branches before the next
> > version logic is deployed), etc
> 
> Twice a year for Rawhide. And upon initiation of major upgrade on
> release versions. It wouldn't be all the time.
> 
> > >  I'm not sure what the alternatives are.
> > 
> > That's, easy,
> > 
> > 1. add a generic bootctl install command that knows the different
> > variants of bootloader used in Fedora, how to install them, how to
> > identify which variant is appropriate for a system (make grub and
> > other
> > bootloaders packages install the corresponding info in a directory
> > read
> > by this command)
> > 
> > 2. make it write the id, generation, and deployment options used in
> > a
> > lockfile every time it (re)installs the bootloader
> > 
> > 3. add a config file with a variable to inhibit auto-redeployment
> > 
> > 4. add a scriptlet to the bootctl package that calls bootctl
> > install
> > and
> >  – checks the variant in the lockfile is appropriate for the
> > hardware
> > (in case of disk mode or copy)
> >  – checks if the generation is current or unknown (unknown =
> > future, do
> > not touch)
> >  – and if any of those is false, reinstalls the bootloader, unless
> > the
> > inhibit variable is set
> > 
> > 5. add a --force switch to bootctl to allow the operator to force a
> > bootloader rewrite every time somethins else broke it
> 
> I think that's completely out of scope. It's inappropriate to wait 10
> months let alone 10 years to resolve this problem. And it's an overly
> complicated solution. 

It's not an overcomplicated solution it's just putting a single stable
unchanging installation command in front of whatever anaconda does.
Which grubby was not since it was grub-specific with lots of options.

Not making the effort to put this single command in place, is the
reason why Fedora boot problems in 2019, are the same than RHL boot
problems in 2000:

1. no one knows exactly what to call to reinstall the bootloader except
bootloader people (it changes and is badly documented),

2. therefore no one can test the result on the scale needed for the
variety of hardware out there

3. when someone hits a bootloader problem, and tries to fix his system
with whatever lies on the internet (because the documentation is not
here, and the documentation is needed, because the actual commands to
type change), it's never exactly what bootloader people think he should
do, so the result is invalid (positive or negative), and not used to
improve the way Fedora does things

4. because there is no master command, and the actual commands change
over time, there is no incentive to do something in new sets of
commands, that salvages whatever was done in the previous set of
commands

5. it ends up in new full system installs just to get anaconda to the
point it does this part (and RHL supported in-place updates, while
Fedora will insist on blowing up the previous install)

6. and everyone involved insists it's "too complex" to set up an easy
to document master install command

7. something should be put in place "now" and not wait 10 months or 10
years

Well Fedora and RHL have spent 20 years avoiding cleaning up this mess
and it's still the same original mess so at one point 10 months seems
awfully short period to get it done.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org