[Test-Announce] 2020-01-20 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2020-01-20 # Time: 16:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! Sorry for the short notice, I've been traveling and forgot to send this out yesterday. But let's have a quick meeting today to catch up on current status and proposals. If anyone has any other items for the agenda, please reply to this email and suggest them! Thanks. == Proposed Agenda Topics == 1. Previous meeting follow-up 2. Outstanding proposals 3. F32 status 4. Test Day / community event status 5. Open floor -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-devel] Please review: 50831 Add cargo.lock for offline builds
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50832 — Sincerely, William Brown Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server SUSE Labs ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-d2256048ae
python-django-2.2.9-1.el8
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-da5ff125c7
gnulib-0-31.20200107git.el8
10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ea80fd1fc3
rubygem-rack-2.0.8-1.el8
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b03f11686e
chromium-79.0.3945.117-1.el8
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-0d2d3afda2
ImageMagick-6.9.10.86-1.el8
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-1acfe4c236
upx-3.95-5.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
nss-mdns-0.14.1-5.el8
perl-CGI-Compile-0.23-1.el8
xfce4-whiskermenu-plugin-2.3.5-1.el8
Details about builds:
nss-mdns-0.14.1-5.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ea93165071)
glibc plugin for .local name resolution
Update Information:
Properly work with or without authselect
ChangeLog:
* Sun Jan 19 2020 Adam Goode - 0.14.1-5
- Properly work with or without authselect (BZ #1577243)
* Thu Jul 25 2019 Fedora Release Engineering -
0.14.1-4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
References:
[ 1 ] Bug #1577243 - nss-mdns modifies /etc/nsswitch.conf in scriptlets which
conflicts with authselect on Fedora 28
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577243
perl-CGI-Compile-0.23-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-c493c6197a)
Compile .cgi scripts to a code reference like ModPerl::Registry
Update Information:
This update bumps perl-CGI-Compile to the 0.23 version but also adds
dependencies on perl-Plack.
ChangeLog:
* Sun Jan 19 2020 Emmanuel Seyman - 0.23-1
- Update to 0.23
- Replace calls to %{__perl} with /usr/bin/perl
- Remove no-longer-needed patch
xfce4-whiskermenu-plugin-2.3.5-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-11fd15a55b)
An alternate application launcher for Xfce
Update Information:
- Update to 2.3.5
ChangeLog:
* Sun Jan 19 2020 Filipe Rosset - 2.3.5-1
- Update to 2.3.5
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-01-20 - 96% PASS
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/01/20/report-389-ds-base-1.4.3.1-20200120gitcf849cc.fc31.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 523 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d condor-8.6.11-1.el7 265 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c499781e80 python-gnupg-0.4.4-1.el7 263 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-bc0182548b bubblewrap-0.3.3-2.el7 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-75cc3918d1 rubygem-ox-2.4.11-5.el7 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-9ffdf25269 python-django-1.11.27-1.el7 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-12cd208593 gnulib-0-31.20200107git.el7 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-de388d4fd0 chromium-79.0.3945.117-1.el7 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-35e87bab10 perl-Clipboard-0.21-1.el7.1 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a062204588 rubygem-rack-1.6.12-1.el7 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-87fd65eed3 python3-pillow-6.2.2-1.el7 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-345003feba thunderbird-enigmail-2.1.5-1.el7 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-348d34c4c6 elog-3.1.4-1.20190113git283534d97d5a.el7 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-807cf11068 upx-3.95-5.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing links-2.20.2-1.el7 nss-mdns-0.14.1-5.el7 relval-2.4.11-1.el7 Details about builds: links-2.20.2-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a16a109471) Web browser running in both graphics and text mode Update Information: Update to a new version. Security bug fixed: when links was connected to tor, it would send real dns requests outside the tor network when the displayed page contains http://host.domain/;>. Fix reading one byte beyond allocated space in case of corrupted UTF-8 data - CVE-2017-4 ChangeLog: * Sun Jan 19 2020 Lubomir Rintel - 1:2.20.2-1 - New release * Thu Jul 25 2019 Fedora Release Engineering - 1:2.17-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild * Fri Feb 1 2019 Fedora Release Engineering - 1:2.17-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Oct 31 2018 Lubomir Rintel - 1:2.17-1 - New release * Fri Jul 13 2018 Fedora Release Engineering - 1:2.14-5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Feb 7 2018 Fedora Release Engineering - 1:2.14-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild * Thu Aug 3 2017 Fedora Release Engineering - 1:2.14-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Jul 26 2017 Fedora Release Engineering - 1:2.14-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild * Tue Mar 21 2017 Lubomir Rintel - 1:2.14-1 - New release * Fri Feb 10 2017 Fedora Release Engineering - 1:2.13-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild References: [ 1 ] Bug #1480633 - CVE-2017-4 links: Global-based 1 byte buffer over-read in put_chars function in html_r.c [epel-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480633 nss-mdns-0.14.1-5.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b5e1d863a8) glibc plugin for .local name resolution Update Information: Properly work with or without authselect ChangeLog: * Sun Jan 19 2020 Adam Goode - 0.14.1-5 - Properly work with or without authselect (BZ #1577243) * Thu Jul 25 2019 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.14.1-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild * Fri Feb 1 2019 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.14.1-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild * Fri Jul 13 2018 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.14.1-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild References: [ 1 ] Bug #1577243 - nss-mdns modifies /etc/nsswitch.conf in scriptlets which conflicts with authselect on Fedora 28 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577243
[Bug 1792672] perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.90126 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792672 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.901 |perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.901 |25 is available |26 is available --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Latest upstream release: 5.90126 Current version/release in rawhide: 5.90124-4.fc31 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Runtime/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/5865/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1789498] perl-Swim-0.1.48 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789498 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Swim-0.1.48-1.fc32 |perl-Swim-0.1.48-1.fc32 |perl-Swim-0.1.48-1.fc30 |perl-Swim-0.1.48-1.fc30 ||perl-Swim-0.1.48-1.fc31 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Swim-0.1.48-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1786801] perl-Encode-3.02 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786801 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Encode-3.02-440.fc32 |perl-Encode-3.02-440.fc32 |perl-Encode-3.02-11.fc30|perl-Encode-3.02-11.fc30 ||perl-Encode-3.02-440.fc31 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Encode-3.02-440.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: qpid-proton removal impact
On 20. 01. 20 1:05, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 19. 01. 20 23:45, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 13. 01. 20 17:19, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:34:15PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: qpid-proton is orphaned with a lot of impacted packages: ...snip... This section is not very accurate. It is not Koji that gets broken, only python3-koji-hub-plugins and the dependent packages just need koji, not the kojihub plugins. Either way, I think somebody should pay attention to the broken and orphaned qpid-proton package -- there are some real packages impacted by this. I looked at this a while back and thought about taking qpid-proton, but then I decided that I would wait and see if anyone actually interested in it would take it, and if not, look at just dropping the koji dependency. Looks like somebody took it and orphaned it again yesterday, restarting the counter. Or maybe pagure just stopped providing the proper info here. Will re-check. OK, it was just some temporary glitch. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: qpid-proton removal impact
On 19. 01. 20 23:45, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 13. 01. 20 17:19, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:34:15PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: qpid-proton is orphaned with a lot of impacted packages: ...snip... This section is not very accurate. It is not Koji that gets broken, only python3-koji-hub-plugins and the dependent packages just need koji, not the kojihub plugins. Either way, I think somebody should pay attention to the broken and orphaned qpid-proton package -- there are some real packages impacted by this. I looked at this a while back and thought about taking qpid-proton, but then I decided that I would wait and see if anyone actually interested in it would take it, and if not, look at just dropping the koji dependency. Looks like somebody took it and orphaned it again yesterday, restarting the counter. Or maybe pagure just stopped providing the proper info here. Will re-check. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Review Swap Request
Hello, I have two packages for a review swap - they should be fairly straightforward. python3-userpath is a python module for manipulating the $PATH variable for several shells; also it is a dependency of pipx : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790232 pipx is a tool for installing various python scripts/commands (and their dependencies) in their own local virtualenvs. It is similar to pipsi (which is also in the archive; pipsi upstream recommends pipx instead - https://github.com/mitsuhiko/pipsi): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790241 Thanks! Marty ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 32 system-wide change proposal: reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 8:41 AM Bohdan Khomutskyi wrote: > > Hello, > > Thanks everyone for posting feedback. > More benchmarking results are available at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Changes/OptimizeSquashFS, including > the 'plain' SquashFS filesystem. > After performing the tests, I personally recommend to use xz compression with > 1MiB block size, without bcj, on a 'plain' squash filesystem -- this will > lead to a reduction of 142MiB on the ISO, compared to the stock Fedora 31 > Workstation x86_64 image. > Alternative compression options, such as Zstd, are also mentioned in the > change proposal. Thanks for all the tests. While I see the meaningfully reduced CPU hit of xz compressed images, the proposal leaves a lot of performance improvement on the table by not also enabling zstd as an option in the compose process. The tests show zstd results, but the proposal doesn't mention zstd at all. In particular for Workstation ISO, the CPU hit isn't worth the size savings for regular users, let alone the recurring hit for releng composes and QA's automated installation tests. It's a lot of CPU burn at both ends of the candle, for not a lot of size savings. I'm not convinced it's worth the extra hit on the create side for Zstd level 22, compared to Zstd 15 or 17. I admit I'm biased toward the two endpoints: create and consume, not distribution ,i.e the mirror donors. Their storage and bandwidth concerns were evaluated with the RPM change from xz to zstd. So I'm mystified by the bias for image size. Anyway, I approve of the change but disappointed if it really doesn't let Fedora release engineering the ability to choose (possibly based on image type - maybe there's some benefit to using xz for raw and qcow2 images). -- Chris Murphy ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: qpid-proton removal impact
On 13. 01. 20 17:19, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:34:15PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: qpid-proton is orphaned with a lot of impacted packages: ...snip... This section is not very accurate. It is not Koji that gets broken, only python3-koji-hub-plugins and the dependent packages just need koji, not the kojihub plugins. Either way, I think somebody should pay attention to the broken and orphaned qpid-proton package -- there are some real packages impacted by this. I looked at this a while back and thought about taking qpid-proton, but then I decided that I would wait and see if anyone actually interested in it would take it, and if not, look at just dropping the koji dependency. Looks like somebody took it and orphaned it again yesterday, restarting the counter. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [F32] Avogadro moves to Avogadro2
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020, 20:51 Antonio Trande wrote:
>
>
> On 19/01/20 19:51, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 7:47 PM Antonio Trande
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all.
> >>
> >> Avogadro(1) package supports Python2 only.
> >> My intention is to retire this package on Fedora 32+; at the same time,
> >> Avogadro2 will be the replacement of Avogadro(1) on Fedora 32+ by moving
> >> up the Epoch to 1, and obsoleting the old Avogadro(1).
> >>
> >> Summarizing, starting from Fedora 32:
> >> Avogadro(1) --> retired
> >> Avogadro2 will have (avogadro-1.3.0 does not exist but will obsolete
> >> any 1.2.0 release):
> >>
> >> %if 0%{?fedora} > 31
> >> `Epoch: 1`
> >> `Obsoletes: avogadro < 0:1.3.0-1`
> >> `Provides: avogadro = 1:%{version}-%{release}`
> >> %endif
> >
> > Two questions:
> >
> > - is avogadro2 compatible with avogadro? if not, it should not provide
> > the old package, and if it is parallel installable, also not obsolete
> > it.
>
> They will not be installable together, not for compatibility issue but
> because avogadro(1) (without Python2) will not be available anymore.
>
> > - does avogadro2 have a smaller version than avogadro(1)? looking at
> > its homepage, that does not seem to be the case. so ... why do you
> > need Epoch?
> >
>
> None smaller version than avogadro(1). Epoch should make Avogadro2 the
> new Avogadro since the v2 release (like upstream wrote) is a re-writed
> Avogadro project under development.
>
Ok, good, then Providing and Obsoleting the old package should be the right
thing, and you don't need Epoch if the version is higher anyway.
Fabio
>
> --
> ---
> Antonio Trande
> Fedora Project
> mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
> GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
> GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [F32] Avogadro moves to Avogadro2
On 19/01/20 19:51, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 7:47 PM Antonio Trande wrote:
>>
>> Hi all.
>>
>> Avogadro(1) package supports Python2 only.
>> My intention is to retire this package on Fedora 32+; at the same time,
>> Avogadro2 will be the replacement of Avogadro(1) on Fedora 32+ by moving
>> up the Epoch to 1, and obsoleting the old Avogadro(1).
>>
>> Summarizing, starting from Fedora 32:
>> Avogadro(1) --> retired
>> Avogadro2 will have (avogadro-1.3.0 does not exist but will obsolete
>> any 1.2.0 release):
>>
>> %if 0%{?fedora} > 31
>> `Epoch: 1`
>> `Obsoletes: avogadro < 0:1.3.0-1`
>> `Provides: avogadro = 1:%{version}-%{release}`
>> %endif
>
> Two questions:
>
> - is avogadro2 compatible with avogadro? if not, it should not provide
> the old package, and if it is parallel installable, also not obsolete
> it.
They will not be installable together, not for compatibility issue but
because avogadro(1) (without Python2) will not be available anymore.
> - does avogadro2 have a smaller version than avogadro(1)? looking at
> its homepage, that does not seem to be the case. so ... why do you
> need Epoch?
>
None smaller version than avogadro(1). Epoch should make Avogadro2 the
new Avogadro since the v2 release (like upstream wrote) is a re-writed
Avogadro project under development.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mock build Fedora package on CentOS 7
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 2:08 PM Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Thursday, January 16, 2020 4:50:09 PM CET Ian Pilcher wrote: > > On 1/16/20 9:39 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Feature-container-for-bootstrap > > > > Right, but it still doesn't work. > > The latest mock/mock-core-configs packages have broken > --use-bootstrap-container > option, you'd have to step one release back to mock 1.4.20, because of this: > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/issues/394 > > It is also a good chance to try pre-release mock from, it contains many > fixes related to dnf/yum (non-)compatibility: > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/mock/mock/ > > Pavel Ian, you may want to borrow my mockrepo building tools to build a local copy of mock itself for version 1.4.20. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mock build Fedora package on CentOS 7
On Thursday, January 16, 2020 4:50:09 PM CET Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 1/16/20 9:39 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Feature-container-for-bootstrap > > Right, but it still doesn't work. The latest mock/mock-core-configs packages have broken --use-bootstrap-container option, you'd have to step one release back to mock 1.4.20, because of this: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/issues/394 It is also a good chance to try pre-release mock from, it contains many fixes related to dnf/yum (non-)compatibility: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/mock/mock/ Pavel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [F32] Avogadro moves to Avogadro2
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 7:47 PM Antonio Trande wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> Avogadro(1) package supports Python2 only.
> My intention is to retire this package on Fedora 32+; at the same time,
> Avogadro2 will be the replacement of Avogadro(1) on Fedora 32+ by moving
> up the Epoch to 1, and obsoleting the old Avogadro(1).
>
> Summarizing, starting from Fedora 32:
> Avogadro(1) --> retired
> Avogadro2 will have (avogadro-1.3.0 does not exist but will obsolete
> any 1.2.0 release):
>
> %if 0%{?fedora} > 31
> `Epoch: 1`
> `Obsoletes: avogadro < 0:1.3.0-1`
> `Provides: avogadro = 1:%{version}-%{release}`
> %endif
Two questions:
- is avogadro2 compatible with avogadro? if not, it should not provide
the old package, and if it is parallel installable, also not obsolete
it.
- does avogadro2 have a smaller version than avogadro(1)? looking at
its homepage, that does not seem to be the case. so ... why do you
need Epoch?
Fabio
> --
> ---
> Antonio Trande
> Fedora Project
> mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
> GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
> GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[F32] Avogadro moves to Avogadro2
Hi all.
Avogadro(1) package supports Python2 only.
My intention is to retire this package on Fedora 32+; at the same time,
Avogadro2 will be the replacement of Avogadro(1) on Fedora 32+ by moving
up the Epoch to 1, and obsoleting the old Avogadro(1).
Summarizing, starting from Fedora 32:
Avogadro(1) --> retired
Avogadro2 will have (avogadro-1.3.0 does not exist but will obsolete
any 1.2.0 release):
%if 0%{?fedora} > 31
`Epoch: 1`
`Obsoletes: avogadro < 0:1.3.0-1`
`Provides: avogadro = 1:%{version}-%{release}`
%endif
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1792742] perl-Mojolicious-8.32 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792742 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Mojolicious-8.32-1.fc3 ||2 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Last Closed||2020-01-19 18:17:08 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1430654 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mock build Fedora package on CentOS 7
On 1/18/20 12:57 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: This is turning into a "debug mock on CentOS" discussion, not a Fedora discussion per se. Please let me know if it should be over in the mock github.com issues instead. Indeed. My original hope was that I was simply missing something that was obvious to folks who do this more often. (I only started on this path because the thunderbird RPM takes so painfully long to rebuild, and my CentOS 7 server is much more powerful than my Fedora workstation.) OTOH, this issue is probably(?) fairly specific to building Fedora packages. I think you're missing some of the options I've suggested for dnf based operating systems, or fedora-31.tmpl in particular in my published mock-core-configs.spec file. And is you "mock" up to the latest reason from EPEL I'll urge you to publish a diff between the RPM published fedora-31.tmpl and yours to isolate the issue. AFAIK, I have the latest version of mock: [root@breadbox templates]# rpm -q mock mock-core-configs mock-1.4.21-1.el7.noarch mock-core-configs-31.7-1.el7.noarch Here is the diff: [root@breadbox templates]# diff -u fedora-31.tpl.orig fedora-31.tpl --- fedora-31.tpl.orig 2019-11-01 09:17:14.0 -0500 +++ fedora-31.tpl 2020-01-18 16:49:47.973139724 -0600 @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ config_opts['releasever'] = '31' config_opts['package_manager'] = 'dnf' config_opts['bootstrap_image'] = 'fedora:31' +config_opts['use_bootstrap_image'] = True +config_opts['use_bootstrap_container'] = True config_opts['yum.conf'] = """ [main] -- In Soviet Russia, Google searches you! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Bubblemail: looking for package maintainer
Hi, I'm the author of Bubblemail, a mail notification service providing a D-Bus interface : http://bubblemail.free.fr Git Repo : https://framagit.org/razer/bubblemail It's a brand new project coming from the fork of the mailnag project, with first goal to get it running on python3. Since then, I have rewritten almost all the code in a more modern and simplest way, get it pep8 compliant, improve stability, features and tests, and build a more modern gtk3 interface on it. On top of that, I make the same work on the gnome-shell extension, already available on the gnome-shell extension website : https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/2458/bubblemail/ https://framagit.org/razer/bubblemail-gnome-shell I currently maintain myself rpm and deb packages, and I'm looking for someone for the rpm part of the task, hopping for proper Fedora integration. It's almost pure python3 code using setuptools, I suppose it should be easy to build and maintain an rpm package for someone used with the task. Please contact me: razerraz AT free DOT fr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: coq build failure with OCaml 4.10
... Or maybe not. That patch fixes the first problem, but then there's a seemingly much harder problem: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5534/40745534/build.log I'm going to leave Coq alone for now. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: coq build failure with OCaml 4.10
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 01:10:28PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=40738495 > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8495/40738495/build.log > > To save a bit of time I'll tell you what's going on: Coq is trying to > use char *young_limit which is an internal OCaml garbage collector > field. This worked in older OCaml, but will not work in OCaml 4.10 > since GC state is now kept in an indirect structure (because of > multicore GC). So Coq upstream is going to need to be fixed so > whatever it's trying to do with the GC internals it stops doing :-/ > > As I doubt this is going to be an easy fix, I blocked coq + dependent > packages from the mass rebuild. I found a PR upstream which fixes this: https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/11358/commits/4af1f7ec60b442ef815c056ce95519cfe1621ca3 I will add this and restart the build on the Coq packages + deps. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 32 system-wide change proposal: reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem
Hello, Thanks everyone for posting feedback. More benchmarking results are available at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Changes/OptimizeSquashFS, including the 'plain' SquashFS filesystem. After performing the tests, I personally recommend to use xz compression with 1MiB block size, without bcj, on a 'plain' squash filesystem -- this will lead to a reduction of 142MiB on the ISO, compared to the stock Fedora 31 Workstation x86_64 image. Alternative compression options, such as Zstd, are also mentioned in the change proposal. Select re-packaged ISOs of Fedora 31 Workstation x86-64 is available for download at https://khomutsky.com/fedora-dvd/ On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 5:34 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 5:46 PM Bohdan Khomutskyi > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I posted more benchmark results in this article: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Changes/OptimizeSquashFS >> >> In short, bigger block size and higher compression ratio does not >> increase the installation time for Fedora Workstation. I saw the >> opposite effect. >> The Zstd compression performed worse than XZ in the compression test. On >> the other hand, 40% lower installation time for Zstd, was documented. Along >> with the CPU consumption 37% lower. >> All installation tests were performed from and to local NVMe storage. >> Which I consider far from real life scenario. >> > > This is very interesting, thank you! > > The "CPU user time" should be independent on the number of CPU cores you > have, is that correct? I.e. the number should be always roughly the same, > whether you run it on 1 core, 2 cores or 8 cores, right? I'm asking because > our QA tests often use 1-2 cores for installation, and I assume you used > all your available cores (if I read it correctly, you seem to have a 4 core > system), therefore the "real time" value is applicable just to your system, > but the "cpu user time" should be better comparable to other systems. > > How exactly did you measure those numbers, can you please provide > reproduction steps? > > I'm quite surprised that plain squashfs is a bit smaller, but also a bit > slower than squashfs+ext4. Our expectations were that it would be faster. > > Looking at compressions, the most interesting results for me are: > -comp xz, without -Xbcj x86 --- cutting CPU time by 50% at the expense of > 30MB is awesome > -Xdict-size 1M -b 1M, without -Xbcj x86 (optionally with hardlinking) --- > 33% speedup while also saving 110 MB > -comp zstd -Xcompression 15 -b 1M --- blazing fast installation with > cutting CPU time by 80%, but also increasing the size by 150 MB > > I'm sure different people will have different priorities regarding size > and installation time, but these are really interesting numbers, thanks for > benchmarking. > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Bohdan Khomutskyi, RHCE Release configuration management engineer, PnT DevOps Red Hat Czech s.r.o T: +420532270289 IRC: bkhomuts ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1792742] New: perl-Mojolicious-8.32 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792742 Bug ID: 1792742 Summary: perl-Mojolicious-8.32 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Mojolicious Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: emman...@seyman.fr, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, robinlee.s...@gmail.com, yan...@declera.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 8.32 Current version/release in rawhide: 8.31-1.fc32 URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Mojolicious Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/5966/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1792689] perl-IO-Tty-1.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792689 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-IO-Tty-1.14-1.fc32 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Assignee|tcall...@redhat.com |p...@city-fan.org Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Last Closed||2020-01-19 14:57:55 --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth --- Build done: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=40742312 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1792508] perl-Test-Simple-1.302171 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792508 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Simple-1.302171-1 ||.fc32 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Last Closed||2020-01-19 14:39:36 --- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth --- Build done: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=40741648 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
How to debugging i-nex
Hi, can someone tell me how to debug the programm i-nex (gambas3 based) ? Regards Martin ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
coq build failure with OCaml 4.10
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=40738495 https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8495/40738495/build.log To save a bit of time I'll tell you what's going on: Coq is trying to use char *young_limit which is an internal OCaml garbage collector field. This worked in older OCaml, but will not work in OCaml 4.10 since GC state is now kept in an indirect structure (because of multicore GC). So Coq upstream is going to need to be fixed so whatever it's trying to do with the GC internals it stops doing :-/ As I doubt this is going to be an easy fix, I blocked coq + dependent packages from the mass rebuild. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests. http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: FYI: OCaml 4.10.0 beta1 will go into Fedora 32 soonish
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 11:32:30PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 10:30 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > About the current rebuild: I finally fixed a bunch of problems with my > > rebuild script (which I'm writing at the same time, see [2]) - but now > > Koji seems to be actually broken ... > > Sounds interesting! > > [2] > > https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2020/01/14/goals-an-experimental-new-tool-which-generalizes-make/ I just realized this is by default submitting up to builds in parallel, which on my local machine is 24. Oops. I've dialed it back so it will only submit at most 4 at a time. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: FYI: OCaml 4.10.0 beta1 will go into Fedora 32 soonish
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 12:02:34PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 11:32:30PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > defolos: ocaml-bin-prot, ocaml-deriving > > I believe these two were accidentally unorphaned. Actually see Jerry James's more accurate answer. > ocaml-ulex FTBFS, needs investigation. This is one of the ones which depended on camlp4 and should be orphaned or retired. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: FYI: OCaml 4.10.0 beta1 will go into Fedora 32 soonish
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 11:32:30PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > andyli: ocaml-benchmark, ocaml-rope ocaml-benchmark should be rebuilt in the current round. ocaml-rope was missing from my mass rebuild tool, now added. > avsej: utop Was missing from my mass rebuild too, now added. > defolos: ocaml-bin-prot, ocaml-deriving I believe these two were accidentally unorphaned. > orion: ocaml-plplot The source package is plplot which will be rebuilt this round. > rjones: ocaml-curl, ocaml-json-wheel, ocaml-ocamlnet, ocaml-pxp, > ocaml-ulex, ocaml-xmlrpc-light ocaml-curl: Not sure what happened there. It is in the mass rebuild list so let's see if it rebuilds this time. ocaml-json-wheel should be orphaned. ocaml-ocamlnet was rebuilt last in November and is on the current list. ocaml-pxp should be orphaned. ocaml-ulex FTBFS, needs investigation. ocaml-xmlrpc-light is on the list. > tc01: ocaml-dose3, ocaml-lambda-term, ocaml-lwt-log I added the last two to the mass rebuild list now. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1792672] perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.90125 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792672 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||CPAN 131513 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-Cloud-31-20200119.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: RFC: Python minimization in Fedora
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 03:35:29PM -0500, James Cassell wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020, at 5:16 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > A quick benchmark: > > $ time python3 -c 'import importlib as i, pydoc_data.topics as t; > > [i.reload(t) for _ in range(1)]' > > python3 -c 4.16s user 0.45s system 99% cpu 4.646 total > [...] > > sudo rm /usr/lib64/python3.7/pydoc_data/__pycache__/topics.cpython-37.* > > > > $ time python3 -c 'import importlib as i, pydoc_data.topics as t; > > [i.reload(t) for _ in range(1000)]' > > python3 -c 13.73s user 0.46s system 96% cpu 14.728 total > [...] > > But the effect of having *some* .pyc file is not. For this file (which > > is 600+kb), the difference is 147.28/4.646 ≈ 30 times. So we clearly > > need to keep the possibility of installing .pyc files, at least optionally. > > > > Thanks for doing these benchmarks! I think you misplaced a decimal in the > analysis, though; it's closer to 3 times performance difference, not 30 > times. (Unless I missed something.) The number of loops is different (10k vs 1k), so the ratio I posted is correct. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-Cloud-30-20200119.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1792699] New: perl-CDB_File-1.00 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792699 Bug ID: 1792699 Summary: perl-CDB_File-1.00 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-CDB_File Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: mmcki...@umich.edu Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: mmcki...@umich.edu, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.00 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.99-11.fc31 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CDB_File/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/2685/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1792699] perl-CDB_File-1.00 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792699 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- An HTTP error occurred downloading the package's new Source URLs: Getting https://cpan.metacpan.org/authors/id/M/MS/MSERGEANT/CDB_File-1.00.tar.gz to ./CDB_File-1.00.tar.gz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
