[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-08-22 - 95% PASS

[vashirov]

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/08/22/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.4-20200821gitb8e9773.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870775] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870775

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-9a73ffdc46 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-9a73ffdc46

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870760] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-MooseX-Types-LoadableClass

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870760

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-MooseX-Types-LoadableC
   ||lass-0.015-11.el8
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-08-22 01:23:54



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4f493efeb9 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870780] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-DeepAbstractSearch

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870780

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-088769a4d0 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-088769a4d0

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870776] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870776

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-750fbd57b1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-750fbd57b1

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870757] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Pg

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870757

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-3accd15340 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-3accd15340

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 738  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d   
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
 477  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-bc0182548b   
bubblewrap-0.3.3-2.el7
 187  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-fa8a2e97c6   
python-waitress-1.4.3-1.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

blis-0.7.0-6.el7

Details about builds:



 blis-0.7.0-6.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-c1ecb8de85)
 BLAS-like Library Instantiation Software Framework

Update Information:

Fix the libblas64 soname.

ChangeLog:

* Sun Aug 16 2020 Dave Love  - 0.7.0-6
- Fix libblas64 soname
* Sat Aug  1 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.7.0-5
- Second attempt - Rebuilt for
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
* Mon Jul 27 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.7.0-4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
* Mon Jul  6 2020 Dave Love  - 0.7.0-4
- Change conditional BR of memkind-devel
* Wed Jul  1 2020 Dave Love  - 0.7.0-3
- Patch to build 64-, not 32-bit version on s390x (#1852549)
* Wed May 27 2020 Dave Love  - 0.7.0-2
- Revert build for arches that don't actually have memkind packages
* Wed May 20 2020 Dave Love  - 0.7.0-1
- New version
- Drop patch
- Maybe use devtoolset-9
* Sun Mar 15 2020 Dave love  - 0.6.0-5
- Use cortexa9 config on arm32, rather than generic
* Tue Jan 28 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.6.0-5
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870766] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Devel-ArgNames

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870766

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-40a176c83b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-40a176c83b

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870778] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-IO-Interactive

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870778

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-80a523b54f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-80a523b54f

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870758] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Math-Base36

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870758

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-565586fd7c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-565586fd7c

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870770] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Package-Variant

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870770

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-51f65279cb has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-51f65279cb

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870779] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-VM-EC2-Security-CredentialCache

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870779

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-24815a2900 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-24815a2900

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1823368] Please add perl-Curses to EPEL8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823368

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-dece13793c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-dece13793c

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870752] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Context-Preserve

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870752

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-48e1c57c53 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-48e1c57c53

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870765] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Directory-Scratch

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870765

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-5cd1c5b2c7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-5cd1c5b2c7

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870747] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Class-Accessor-Grouped

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870747

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bad9bf2bf1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bad9bf2bf1

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870748] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Class-C3-Componentised

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870748

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-9bbd5eef31 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-9bbd5eef31

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870739] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-VM-EC2

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870739

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-99cfb64cf3 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-99cfb64cf3

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870741] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-AnyEvent-CacheDNS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870741

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-af2bd45610 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-af2bd45610

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [HEADS UP] Sphinx updated to 3.2

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On Sat, 2020-08-22 at 01:13 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 22. 08. 20 0:18, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 16:43 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > I've updated python-sphinx to 3.2.1 in rawhide and f33.
> > > 
> > Ah, it's one of those packages I'm technically the primary
> > maintainer
> > of that I'm trying to offload.
> > 
> > Can I give it to you, or to the SIG?
> 
> Hi!
> 
> The SIG cannot be the main admin, feel free to give it to me.
> 
Done, thanks!

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keybase.io/michel_slm
chat via email: https://delta.chat/
GPG key: 5DCE 2E7E 9C3B 1CFF D335 C1D7 8B22 9D2F 7CCC 04F2


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1867692] airscan driver crashes in mock during wsdd_cleanup()

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867692

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||sane-airscan-0.99.13-2.fc32
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-08-22 01:42:59



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-841f4ce8df has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 33 blocker status

[Ben Cotton]

Action summary


Accepted blockers
-
1. libreport — abrt-server errors when processing zstd compressed core
dumps produced by systemd-246~rc1-1.fc33 — POST
ACTION: abrt maintainers to make a new release containing the fix

2. resteasy — FreeIPA deployment fails in current Rawhide due to
various issues with Java 11 — NEW
ACTION: resteasy maintainers to diagnose issue and fix or pass the
buck as appropriate

3. sddm — login stuck when changing users repeatedly (log out, log in
a different one) — NEW
ACTION: sddm maintainers to diagnose issue and fix or pass the buck as
appropriate

4. selinux-policy — SELinux is preventing systemd-machine from
'create' accesses on the sock_file io.systemd.Machine. — POST
ACTION: selinux-policy maintainers to make a new release containing the fixes

5. tomcat — FreeIPA server deployment fails in
Fedora-Rawhide-20200714.n.0 — MODIFIED
ACTION: tomcat maintainers to investigate failed upgrade test

6. distribution — Workstation live x86_64 image exceeds maximum size — NEW
ACTION: Workstation WG to determine whether or not to remove packages
or increase size limit.

7. distribution — Everything boot x86_64 image exceeds maximum size — ASSIGNED
ACTION: bcotton to get someone to determine whether or not to remove
packages or increase size limit.

8. distribution — Server boot x86_64 image exceeds maximum size — NEW
ACTION: Server WG to determine whether or not to remove packages or
increase size limit.

9. distribution — Release-blocking Fedora 33 images have Fedora 32
backgrounds — NEW
ACTION: kde-settings maintainers to update package to use new backgrounds

Proposed blockers
-

1. systemd  — systemd-resolved.service not work with DNS server placed
behind VPN (openconnect) — NEW
ACTION: systemd maintainers to diagnose issue



Bug-by-bug detail
=

Accepted blockers
-
1. libreport — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860616 — POST
abrt-server errors when processing zstd compressed core dumps produced
by systemd-246~rc1-1.fc33

abrt doesn't support core dumps compressed with zstd, which is now
used by systemd. Merged upstream PR uses libarchive to add support for
zstd (and other compression formats):
https://github.com/abrt/libreport/pull/656.

2. resteasy — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1866570 — NEW
FreeIPA deployment fails in current Rawhide due to various issues with Java 11

Deploying FreeIPA fails with a traceback in pki-tomcat. This appears
to be a dependency chain issue that (currently) ends at resteasy via
dogtag-pki. This may not be the last layer in the Java 11 onion.

3. sddm — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861700 — NEW
login stuck when changing users repeatedly (log out, log in a different one)

This is now a blocker based on a recent approval-in-principle of a
release criterion related to logout and user switching. User processes
linger after logout which blocks logging in when another user has
logged in between the two sessions. Or when the second user logs back
in. Or when a single user logs in repeatedly. Using
KillUserProcesses=Yes helps the first problem, but raises on of its
own. It appears to be a race condition of some kind as the behavior is
not fully consistent.

4. selinux-policy — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862686 — POST
SELinux is preventing systemd-machine from 'create' accesses on the
sock_file io.systemd.Machine.

librvirt VMs and systemd-machined service fail with AVC denials.
Merged upstream PRs should fix the denials mentioned in this bug:
https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy/pull/405 and
https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy/pull/407

5. tomcat — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857043 — MODIFIED
FreeIPA server deployment fails in Fedora-Rawhide-20200714.n.0 due to
pki-tomcat failing to run with "java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.apache.tomcat.util.modeler.modules.MbeansDescriptorsIntrospectionSource"

An upstream commit resulted in tomcat-coyote.jar missing packages. A
previous fix (FEDORA-2020-f897a68801) moved the goalposts.
tomcat-9.0.37-3 should fix this. Verification is blocked on BZ1866570,
but Adam's most recent upgrade test still fails with a
ClassNotFoundException for
com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2.ContextFactory.

6. distribtution — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827915 — NEW
Workstation live x86_64 image exceeds maximum size

Workstation WG is evaluating whether they can reduce the size and if
not will bump the threshold.

7. distribtution — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849430
— ASSIGNED
Everything boot x86_64 image exceeds maximum size

Who owns this anyway? I'll try to get someone to figure out how we can
save ~14 MB.

8. distribtution — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849431
— ASSIGNED
Server boot x86_64 image exceeds maximum size

We need to slim it down by ~14 MB.

9. distribution — 

[Bug 1870740] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-String-Approx

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870740

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-String-Approx-3.28-13.
   ||el8
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-08-22 01:24:01



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-c33aca3847 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870749] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Class-DBI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870749
Bug 1870749 depends on bug 1870768, which changed state.

Bug 1870768 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Ima-DBI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870768

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870745] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-DBIx-Class

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870745
Bug 1870745 depends on bug 1870760, which changed state.

Bug 1870760 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-MooseX-Types-LoadableClass
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870760

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870773] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Class-DBI-Plugin

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870773

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-0.03-
   ||42.el8
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-08-22 01:24:06



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bbfeccb146 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870768] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Ima-DBI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870768

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Ima-DBI-0.35-30.el8
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-08-22 01:23:59



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-eadc1fdd84 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870769] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Text-RecordParser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870769
Bug 1870769 depends on bug 1870774, which changed state.

Bug 1870774 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Text-TabularDisplay
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870774

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870749] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Class-DBI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870749

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Class-DBI-3.0.17-38.el
   ||8
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-08-22 01:24:04



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bbfeccb146 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870773] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Class-DBI-Plugin

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870773
Bug 1870773 depends on bug 1870749, which changed state.

Bug 1870749 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Class-DBI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870749

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870739] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-VM-EC2

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870739
Bug 1870739 depends on bug 1870740, which changed state.

Bug 1870740 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-String-Approx
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870740

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870774] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Text-TabularDisplay

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870774

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Text-TabularDisplay-1.
   ||38-18.el8
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-08-22 01:23:56



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4f493efeb9 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870756] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Date-Simple

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870756

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Date-Simple-3.03-29.el
   ||8
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-08-22 01:23:34



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-8d51be5225 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870745] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-DBIx-Class

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870745
Bug 1870745 depends on bug 1870759, which changed state.

Bug 1870759 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-MooseX-Types-JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870759

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870749] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Class-DBI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870749
Bug 1870749 depends on bug 1870764, which changed state.

Bug 1870764 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Time-Piece-MySQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870764

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870749] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Class-DBI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870749
Bug 1870749 depends on bug 1870750, which changed state.

Bug 1870750 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Class-Trigger
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870750

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870759] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-MooseX-Types-JSON

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870759

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-MooseX-Types-JSON-1.00
   ||-17.el8
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-08-22 01:23:51



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4f493efeb9 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870750] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Class-Trigger

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870750

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Class-Trigger-0.15-1.e
   ||l8
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-08-22 01:23:39



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-d381b4f2e8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870742] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870742

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-MooseX-StrictConstruct
   ||or-0.21-12.el8
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-08-22 01:23:49



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4f493efeb9 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870764] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Time-Piece-MySQL

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870764

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Time-Piece-MySQL-0.06-
   ||13.el8
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-08-22 01:23:37



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-574c1c015c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870768] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Ima-DBI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870768
Bug 1870768 depends on bug 1870753, which changed state.

Bug 1870753 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-DBIx-ContextualFetch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870753

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870767] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-UNIVERSAL-moniker

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870767

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-UNIVERSAL-moniker-0.08
   ||-34.el8
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-08-22 01:23:44



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-211b67f868 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870753] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-DBIx-ContextualFetch

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870753

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-DBIx-ContextualFetch-1
   ||.03-40.el8
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-08-22 01:23:46



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bf910f5c43 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870748] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Class-C3-Componentised

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870748
Bug 1870748 depends on bug 1870772, which changed state.

Bug 1870772 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Class-C3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870772

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870749] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Class-DBI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870749
Bug 1870749 depends on bug 1870756, which changed state.

Bug 1870756 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Date-Simple
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870756

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870749] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Class-DBI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870749
Bug 1870749 depends on bug 1870767, which changed state.

Bug 1870767 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-UNIVERSAL-moniker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870767

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870772] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Class-C3

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870772

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Class-C3-0.34-1.el8
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-08-22 01:23:41



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-702f5c237d has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce] 2020-08-24 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

[Adam Williamson]

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2020-08-24
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net

Greetings testers!

Fedora 33 has branched, and we have a couple of criteria proposals to
discuss, so let's have a meeting on Monday!

If anyone has any other items for the agenda, please reply to this
email and suggest them! Thanks.

== Proposed Agenda Topics ==

1. Previous meeting follow-up
2. Fedora 33 status
3. Criteria proposals: log in/out, networking...
4. Test Day / community event status
5. Open floor
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870875] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200820 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870875



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-da747bb571 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-da747bb571`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-da747bb571

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870878] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200820 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870878



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-1e54e92bc5 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-1e54e92bc5`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1e54e92bc5

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1871053] perl-Module-Load-Conditional-0.74 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871053



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-d47661bf9a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-d47661bf9a`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d47661bf9a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce] 2020-08-24 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 33 Blocker Review Meeting

[Adam Williamson]

# F33 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2020-08-24
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net

Hi folks! We have only 1 proposed Beta blocker to review at present,
but more may well show up over the weekend, so let's have a Fedora 33
blocker review meeting on Monday!

If you have time this weekend, you can take a look at the proposed or
accepted blockers before the meeting -  the full lists can be found
here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ .

We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the 
Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not 
fixed. Information on the release criteria for F33 can be found on the 
wiki [0].

For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, 
check out these links:
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process

And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting 
works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out 
the SOP on the wiki:
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting

Have a good weekend and see you on Monday!

[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870875] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200820 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870875

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-b27df1c13f has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-b27df1c13f`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b27df1c13f

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870878] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200820 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870878

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-a58110a2db has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-a58110a2db`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a58110a2db

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1871053] perl-Module-Load-Conditional-0.74 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871053

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-edd8d15a38 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-edd8d15a38`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-edd8d15a38

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Release criteria proposal: networking requirements

[Adam Williamson]

On Sat, 2020-08-22 at 00:23 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 12:12 AM Adam Williamson
>  wrote:
> 
> > It must be possible to establish both IPv4 and IPv6 network connections
> > using DHCP and static addressing.
> 
> For IPV6, SLAAC is more common than DHCP(v6)
> (especially) in the consumer space.  I would like
> to see a SLAAC requirement be added (for IPv6).

Oh, yeah, of course, that was silly of me. Thanks for pointing it out.
Will amend in the next version.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Release criteria proposal: networking requirements

[Gary Buhrmaster]

On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 12:12 AM Adam Williamson
 wrote:

> It must be possible to establish both IPv4 and IPv6 network connections
> using DHCP and static addressing.

For IPV6, SLAAC is more common than DHCP(v6)
(especially) in the consumer space.  I would like
to see a SLAAC requirement be added (for IPv6).
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Release criteria proposal: networking requirements

[Adam Williamson]

Hi folks!

So at this week's blocker review meeting, the fact that we don't have
explicit networking requirements in the release criteria really started
to bite us. In the past we have squeezed networking-related issues in
under other criteria, but for some issues that's really difficult,
notably VPN issues. So, we agreed we should draft some explicit
networking criteria.

This turns out to be a big area and quite hard to cover (who'd've
thought!), but here is at least a first draft for us to start from. My
proposal would be to add this to the Basic criteria. I have left out
some wikitext stuff from the proposal for clarity; I'd add it back in
on actually applying the proposed changes. It's just formatting stuff,
nothing that'd change the meaning. Anyone have thoughts, complaints,
alternative approaches, supplements? Thanks!

=== Network requirements ===

Each of these requirements apply to both installer and installed system
environments. For any given installer environment, the 'default network
configuration tools' are considered to be those the installer documents
as supported ways to configure networking (e.g. for anaconda-based
environments, configuration via kernel command line options, a
kickstart, or interactively in anaconda itself are included).

 Basic networking 

It must be possible to establish both IPv4 and IPv6 network connections
using DHCP and static addressing. The default network configuration
tools for the console and for release-blocking desktops must work well
enough to allow typical network connection configuration operations
without major workarounds. Standard network functions such as address
resolution and connections with common protocols such as ping, HTTP and
ssh must work as expected.

Footnote titled "Supported hardware": Supported network hardware is
hardware for which the Fedora kernel includes drivers and, where
necessary, for which a firmware package is available. If support for a
commonly-used piece or type of network hardware that would usually be
present is omitted, that may constitute a violation of this criterion,
after consideration of the [[Blocker_Bug_FAQ|hardware-dependent-
issues|normal factors for hardware-dependent issues]]. Similarly,
violations of this criteria that are hardware or configuration
dependent are, as usual, subject to consideration of those factors when
determining whether they are release-blocking

 VPN connections 

Using the default network configuration tools for the console and for
release-blocking desktops, it must be possible to establish a working
connection to common OpenVPN, openconnect-supported and vpnc-supported
VNC servers with typical configurations.

Footnote title "Supported servers and configurations": As there are
many different VPN server applications and configurations, blocker
reviewers must use their best judgment in determining whether
violations of this criterion are likely to be encountered commonly
enough to block a release, and if so, at which milestone. As a general
principle, the more people are likely to use affected servers and the
less complicated the configuration required to hit the bug, the more
likely it is to be a blocker.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [HEADS UP] Sphinx updated to 3.2

[Miro Hrončok]

On 22. 08. 20 0:18, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:

Hi Miro,

On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 16:43 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:

I've updated python-sphinx to 3.2.1 in rawhide and f33.


Ah, it's one of those packages I'm technically the primary maintainer
of that I'm trying to offload.

Can I give it to you, or to the SIG?


Hi!

The SIG cannot be the main admin, feel free to give it to me.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [HEADS UP] Sphinx updated to 3.2

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

Hi Miro,

On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 16:43 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> I've updated python-sphinx to 3.2.1 in rawhide and f33.
> 
Ah, it's one of those packages I'm technically the primary maintainer
of that I'm trying to offload.

Can I give it to you, or to the SIG?

Regards,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keybase.io/michel_slm
chat via email: https://delta.chat/
GPG key: 5DCE 2E7E 9C3B 1CFF D335 C1D7 8B22 9D2F 7CCC 04F2


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Continuing playground discussion

[Troy Dawson]

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 4:52 PM Miro Hrončok  wrote:
>
> On 01. 08. 20 0:13, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > We were having a good discussion about epel8-playground in the
> > Steering Committee meeting this week.  Since we ran out of time I'd
> > like to continue it via email.
> >
> > Most everyone agreed that playground is currently a bit of a mess and
> > it's hard to explain to end users what it is for, or when to use it.
> > It was also agreed that we need to decide on a plan of "this is what
> > playground is for" and then work to setup/cleanup/document things.
> >
> > There seemed to be two main opinions of what to set the plan to.
> >
> > A) epel8-playground is meant for package development and testing for
> > major changes.  We stop doing the "build on both epel8 and
> > epel8-playground", and epel8-playground packages only get built from
> > the epel8-playground dist-git branch.
> >
> > B) epel8-playground is meant for future RHEL/CentOS testing, and thus
> > everything built in epel8-playground get's built off CentOS Stream.
> > We would continue the "build on both epel8 and epel8-playground" and
> > this would make sure packages would be able to build on the newer
> > RHEL.
> >
> > Both of these plans would require epel8-playground cleanup, and
> > re-implementation.  Both would require work.  But the work would be
> > quite different with the different plans.  So until we decide which
> > way to go, we don't know what to do.
> >
> > Thoughts on which plan to choose?  Or if there is something different?
>
> Whatever you do, please get rid of the package.cfg file. It is very confusing
> and very annoying.
>
> See for example
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/P2Z7WDHN567XD5PCLDJ2U63WA2ECUWD2/
>

C) Drop playground.  Say it was an interesting experiment and we
learned stuff, but shut it down.
(and clean up the package.cfg files as part of shutting it down)

D)
1 - Manual builds only.  No package.cfg files.  No automatic builds.
2 - Assume playground depends on epel8.
3 - Use CentOS 8 Stream to build against.

I am leaning towards option D.
We've already got all the playground infrastructure setup.  I don't
want to waste that.  So, although I said option C in the meeting, that
doesn't mean I want it, I was just stating it was an option.

I'd like to get this decided by the end of August so we can start
working on whichever steps we need to take.
And, above all, there is one step we didn't say, but it applied to all
Step 0 - Document it.
Whatever we do, we need to start by documenting it, agreeing on that,
and then do the work to make it that way.

Troy
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: non-verbose %ctest

[Neal Gompa]

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 4:55 PM Christoph Junghans  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The new %ctest macro generates so much output, it sometimes makes it
> hard to find the actual failure. Especially with gtest, where you have
> many tests in one executable and multiple executables run at the same
> time..
>
> Is there a way to drop the "--verbose" option?
> "%ctest --quiet" works but suppresses all outputs.
> "%ctest --no-verbose" does nothing.
> I would just like the normal "ctest --output-on-failure" behavior back.
>

Originally, there was no --verbose option passed to ctest when I added
the %ctest macro precisely because of that reason, but CMake
maintainers added it afterward. I suspect they prefer it that way,
since it's all typically just stuffed into a log and they want *all
the output*.

Maybe file a bug report asking for the option to removed from the
default parameters passed to ctest?




--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

non-verbose %ctest

[Christoph Junghans]

Hi,

The new %ctest macro generates so much output, it sometimes makes it
hard to find the actual failure. Especially with gtest, where you have
many tests in one executable and multiple executables run at the same
time..

Is there a way to drop the "--verbose" option?
"%ctest --quiet" works but suppresses all outputs.
"%ctest --no-verbose" does nothing.
I would just like the normal "ctest --output-on-failure" behavior back.

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Junghans
Web: http://www.compphys.de
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870771] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Graph

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870771

Athos Ribeiro  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Athos Ribeiro  ---
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=49834340


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870771] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Graph

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870771

Athos Ribeiro  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #1 from Athos Ribeiro  ---
Branches requested at

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/27795
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/27796


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: fedora-review fails due to no annobin in mock

[Sérgio Basto]

On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 17:09 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 10:19 +, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> > > - Do you have custom mock configuration in ~/.config/mock.cfg?
> > No, I don't even have that file.
> > 
> > > - Are files in /etc/mock/ up-to-date, or are there lots of
> > > .rpmnew
> > > files?
> > mock-core-configs is up to date (32.7-1.fc32), there's no .rpmnew
> > files.
> > 
> > > - Does running "mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 clean --scrub all"
> > > help?
> > Yes, that helped. I tried nuking /var/lib/mock before, which didn't
> > help, so I guess clean+scrub-all does something more. Or maybe I
> > nuked that before updating the mock-core-configs package, so it got
> > rebuilt using the outdated config.
> 
> So it is fixed ? 

Is not the first time that we need [1] , specially when rawhide bump
the number (f33 -> f34), I guess , is one thing that maybe fedora-
review should take care ... or mock itself :) 

[1] 
mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --scrub all

> 
> -- 
> Sérgio M. B.
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposed Modular Policy for Fedora ELN

[Miro Hrončok]

On 21. 08. 20 10:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:

Josh listed some of the key reasons behind default streams: that
enterprise customers don't like to learn new commands. So default
streams allowed us to package content with shorter-than-RHEL-lifetime
and still `yum install foo` would install something the customer could
use.

I guess that "shorter-than-RHEL-lifetime" is the big differentiator, i.e.
normal rpms cannot be yanked from the distribution, but a module can be.


Actually AFAIK modules shipped at GA cannot be yanked from the distribution 
either. Certainly not in Fedora.


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: fedora-review fails due to no annobin in mock

[Sérgio Basto]

On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 10:19 +, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> > - Do you have custom mock configuration in ~/.config/mock.cfg?
> No, I don't even have that file.
> 
> > - Are files in /etc/mock/ up-to-date, or are there lots of .rpmnew
> > files?
> mock-core-configs is up to date (32.7-1.fc32), there's no .rpmnew
> files.
> 
> > - Does running "mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 clean --scrub all"
> > help?
> Yes, that helped. I tried nuking /var/lib/mock before, which didn't
> help, so I guess clean+scrub-all does something more. Or maybe I
> nuked that before updating the mock-core-configs package, so it got
> rebuilt using the outdated config.

So it is fixed ? 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: CPE Feedback Survey

[Ant Carroll]

Hey all,

First of all, thanks to everyone that has taken the time to complete the
survey for us already. It will remain open until the end of August, so if
you haven't had the chance to fill it in yet, we'd really appreciate you
taking the few minutes to do so before it closes.

Thanks again,

Ant

On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 6:23 PM Ant Carroll  wrote:

> Hey folks,
>
> CPE need your help :)
>
> Over the last several months we've been trying to improve how we interact
> and share information with you all. From the blog posts, to mails and how
> we work on the tickets you send us.
>
> Here is a link to a very short survey we've put together to learn how we
> can give you the best experience possible going forward by understanding
> the experiences you've had recently.
> If you could take the time (5mins max) to complete it for us it would be
> hugely valuable as we work on this continuous improvement -
> https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/696793?lang=en
> 
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ant
> --
>
> Ant Carroll
>
> Associate Manager, CPE Team
>
> Red Hat Waterford 
>
> Communications House
>
> Cork Road, Waterford City
>
> ancar...@redhat.com
> M: +353876213163 IM: ancarrol
> @redhatjobs    redhatjobs
>  @redhatjobs
> 
> 
>


-- 

Ant Carroll

Associate Manager, Software Engineering

Red Hat Waterford 

Communications House

Cork Road, Waterford City

ancar...@redhat.com
M: +353876213163 IM: ancarrol
@redhatjobs    redhatjobs
 @redhatjobs


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposed Modular Policy for Fedora ELN

[Miro Hrončok]

On 21. 08. 20 16:38, Stephen Gallagher wrote:

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 9:41 AM Miro Hrončok  wrote:

I want a policy for Fedora (and I see ELN as part of Fedora) that says: "Default
streams are not allowed."

We already have that policy. In the IRC meeting line you quoted I expressed my
feeling that the policy also applies (and should continue to apply) to ELN,
because ELN **is** Fedora.

This has been my view on this topic since the original FESCo ticket.

I don't understand how should I be more ingenuous.


If my previous email was not clear enough: I accept complete
responsibility for my misunderstanding and I apologize for my
accusation of disingenuousness. I understand your position properly
now and will proceed accordingly.


Thank you.


That said, I (obviously) disagree with the assertion that ELN must not
have default streams and I stand by this proposal as a reasonable way
of defining and controlling how that will work.


I would not expect anything different.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[HEADS UP] Sphinx updated to 3.2

[Miro Hrončok]

I've updated python-sphinx to 3.2.1 in rawhide and f33.

It only breaks one package (python-graphql-core) -- all other packages either 
build fine with new Sphinx or FTBFS for unrelated reasons.


I'll have a look at python-graphql-core to see how it can be fixed.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[HEADS UP] Sphinx updated to 3.2

[Miro Hrončok]

I've updated python-sphinx to 3.2.1 in rawhide and f33.

It only breaks one package (python-graphql-core) -- all other packages either 
build fine with new Sphinx or FTBFS for unrelated reasons.


I'll have a look at python-graphql-core to see how it can be fixed.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870780] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-DeepAbstractSearch

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870780

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-088769a4d0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-088769a4d0


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposed Modular Policy for Fedora ELN

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 9:41 AM Miro Hrončok  wrote:
> I want a policy for Fedora (and I see ELN as part of Fedora) that says: 
> "Default
> streams are not allowed."
>
> We already have that policy. In the IRC meeting line you quoted I expressed my
> feeling that the policy also applies (and should continue to apply) to ELN,
> because ELN **is** Fedora.
>
> This has been my view on this topic since the original FESCo ticket.
>
> I don't understand how should I be more ingenuous.

If my previous email was not clear enough: I accept complete
responsibility for my misunderstanding and I apologize for my
accusation of disingenuousness. I understand your position properly
now and will proceed accordingly.

That said, I (obviously) disagree with the assertion that ELN must not
have default streams and I stand by this proposal as a reasonable way
of defining and controlling how that will work.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870775] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870775

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simpl
   ||e-0.03-20.el8
   ||perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simpl
   ||e-0.03-20.epel8.playground




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870775] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870775



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-9a73ffdc46 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-9a73ffdc46


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870757] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Pg

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870757



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-3accd15340 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-3accd15340


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870776] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870776



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-750fbd57b1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-750fbd57b1


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870770] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Package-Variant

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870770

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-51f65279cb has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-51f65279cb


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870776] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870776

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet
   ||-0.31-20.el8
   ||perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet
   ||-0.31-20.epel8.playground




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870779] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-VM-EC2-Security-CredentialCache

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870779



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-24815a2900 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-24815a2900


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870779] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-VM-EC2-Security-CredentialCache

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870779

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-VM-EC2-Security-Creden
   ||tialCache-0.25-16.el8
   ||perl-VM-EC2-Security-Creden
   ||tialCache-0.25-16.epel8.pla
   ||yground




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

RFC7919 Diffie-Hellman parameters in Fedora

[Christopher Engelhard]

Hi,
tl;dr should we make it easier/automatic for users to use the 
Diffie-Hellman parameters defined in RFC7919?


For a long time, the general recommendation for Finite-Field 
Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral Parameters (FFDHE, for use with 
non-elliptic-curve DH, i.e. the dhparam-file many server configs ask us 
to specify) used in TLS was to generate your own. However, RFC7919 
specifies fixed, auditable parameters with lengths of 2048-8102 bits 
[1], Mozilla has switched their recommendation from 'generate your own' 
to 'use ffdhe2048' [2] and IIRC TLSv3 mandates their use.


Main advantage in using them is a) since they're fixed & well-defined, 
they can be and are audited, b) clients don't have to check whether 
parameters they're given by a server are legit or meddled with 
(something that usually any client program would have to but few 
actually do).


So, questions:
1) do we already ship these groups somewhere, e.g. via a package that I 
don't know about? If not, should we maybe add one?
2) Many programs either ship their own dhparam files (on my systems at 
least proftpd, certbot & openssh, via the moduli file) or expect the 
user to point them to one (like webservers, dovecot, postfix etc.) + 
some for sure hardcode some defaults if the user does not specify 
parameters. Would it make sense to change their defaults - if possible - 
to use (one of the) RFC7919 groups? One could even integrate this with 
crypto-policies, if at some point one wants to e.g. change the desired 
group size.


Best,
Christopher

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7919
[2] https://wiki.mozilla.org/index.php?title=Security/Server_Side_TLS
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870758] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Math-Base36

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870758

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-565586fd7c has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-565586fd7c


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870778] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-IO-Interactive

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870778



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-80a523b54f has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-80a523b54f


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870778] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-IO-Interactive

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870778

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-IO-Interactive-1.022-1
   ||4.el8
   ||perl-IO-Interactive-1.022-1
   ||4.epel8.playground




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870766] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Devel-ArgNames

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870766



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-40a176c83b has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-40a176c83b


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870766] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Devel-ArgNames

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870766

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Devel-ArgNames-0.03-19
   ||.el8
   ||perl-Devel-ArgNames-0.03-19
   ||.epel8.playground




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870757] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Pg

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870757

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-Format-Pg-0.1
   ||6013-12.el8
   ||perl-DateTime-Format-Pg-0.1
   ||6013-12.epel8.playground




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870752] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Context-Preserve

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870752



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-48e1c57c53 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-48e1c57c53


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870752] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Context-Preserve

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870752

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Context-Preserve-0.03-
   ||11.el8
   ||perl-Context-Preserve-0.03-
   ||11.epel8.playground




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposed Modular Policy for Fedora ELN

[Miro Hrončok]

On 21. 08. 20 15:29, Stephen Gallagher wrote:

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 5:08 AM Miro Hrončok  wrote:


On 20. 08. 20 20:17, Stephen Gallagher wrote:

Yet despite all this, we got a proposal to allow default modular streams in ELN.
The messaging about this proposal suggests that later, default modular streams
might be proposed for Fedora as well.


It was written that way*at your request*. You specifically asked for
a proposal for "Fedora" that we could initially apply only to "Fedora
ELN". It seems disingenuous to now use that as an argument against it.


I would appreciate if you could stop saying what I have done or requested when
in fact this was not the case. If it was, please provide quotes.

Never have I requested a proposal for "Fedora" that we could initially apply
only to "Fedora ELN".

I requested that if you want default modular streams in ELN, that you propose it
via regular channels and discuss this with the wider community. You have
volunteered to do a Fedora change proposal. You did (except the proposal said
nothing about default modular streams in ELN). The conversation was logged and
is already posted elsewhere in this thread.

I am genuinely insulted by your false claim. It is hard enough to argue about
the technical side of things, but impossible when you paint me as the
unreasonable troll that just changes the narrative every time you make a step
forward. I understand that your position is complicated and I block you. But
please use fair discussion over calumny.




So, I did some digging through the FESCo meeting notes, and I think I
found the source of the confusion. It originally stems from this
statement:

15:18:41  I don't understand why the Fedora policy for
default modular streams should nto apply to eln, sorry

I think I misread that (and internalized it) as saying that you wanted
a common policy for "Fedora" and that we could then ask for it to be
approved just for ELN. So, I apologize for misrepresenting your
stance.


I want a policy for Fedora (and I see ELN as part of Fedora) that says: "Default 
streams are not allowed."


We already have that policy. In the IRC meeting line you quoted I expressed my 
feeling that the policy also applies (and should continue to apply) to ELN, 
because ELN **is** Fedora.


This has been my view on this topic since the original FESCo ticket.

I don't understand how should I be more ingenuous.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposed Modular Policy for Fedora ELN

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 5:08 AM Miro Hrončok  wrote:
>
> On 20. 08. 20 20:17, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> Yet despite all this, we got a proposal to allow default modular streams 
> >> in ELN.
> >> The messaging about this proposal suggests that later, default modular 
> >> streams
> >> might be proposed for Fedora as well.
> >>
> > It was written that way*at your request*. You specifically asked for
> > a proposal for "Fedora" that we could initially apply only to "Fedora
> > ELN". It seems disingenuous to now use that as an argument against it.
>
> I would appreciate if you could stop saying what I have done or requested when
> in fact this was not the case. If it was, please provide quotes.
>
> Never have I requested a proposal for "Fedora" that we could initially apply
> only to "Fedora ELN".
>
> I requested that if you want default modular streams in ELN, that you propose 
> it
> via regular channels and discuss this with the wider community. You have
> volunteered to do a Fedora change proposal. You did (except the proposal said
> nothing about default modular streams in ELN). The conversation was logged and
> is already posted elsewhere in this thread.
>
> I am genuinely insulted by your false claim. It is hard enough to argue about
> the technical side of things, but impossible when you paint me as the
> unreasonable troll that just changes the narrative every time you make a step
> forward. I understand that your position is complicated and I block you. But
> please use fair discussion over calumny.
>


So, I did some digging through the FESCo meeting notes, and I think I
found the source of the confusion. It originally stems from this
statement:

15:18:41  I don't understand why the Fedora policy for
default modular streams should nto apply to eln, sorry

I think I misread that (and internalized it) as saying that you wanted
a common policy for "Fedora" and that we could then ask for it to be
approved just for ELN. So, I apologize for misrepresenting your
stance.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870779] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-VM-EC2-Security-CredentialCache

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870779

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/27771
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/27772


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ldc soname bump in f33 and rawhide

[Kalev Lember]

Hi all,

I am about to build new ldc 1.23.0 that comes with a soname bump for 
both f33 and rawhide. I'll handle rebuilds of dependencies, with the 
exception of the following two packages that were already FTBFS prior to 
the ldc bump:


appstream-generator
glibd

(Maintainers for the two failing packages are BCC'd.)

--
Kalev
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: hundred percent cpu load

[Wells, Roger K. via devel]

On 8/20/20 6:47 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> As tedious as it is, my suggestion is kernel bisect.
>
> Various strategies abound. I'd probably go for course to fine
> granularity: start with Fedora Live ISOs, and see clearly where it
> does and doesn't happen. It sounds like the problem manifests quickly
> so you don't need to reinstall or compile. Once you've got a good vs
> bad kernel based on ISOs, you probably will need to compile because
> koji kernels aren't kept around more than (eek! I don't know but maybe
> a couple months?). I suggest not bothering with stable updates. Just
> work on the mainline kernel git. 5.3.0 good, 5.7.0 bad.
>
> make localmodconfig will significantly reduce the cost of compile time
>
> If it's not fixed already in 5.8 or 5.9, easy to test because both are
> in koji, I wouldn't assume it's just going to get fixed somehow.
> Someone would have to do a bisect and report it. In very rare cases if
> it's not fixed soonish (a kernel release or two) insist on lkml that
> the change that caused the regression is reverted. Of course, if it's
> hardware related, you won't likely find a good kernel.
>
> --
> Chris Murphy

Thanks for your time & suggestions. 
I have already started trying older live ISO's just don't have but one
right now but I'll find some more

> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


-- 
Roger Wells, P.E.
leidos
221 Third St
Newport, RI 02840
401-847-4210 (voice)
401-849-1585 (fax)
roger.k.we...@leidos.com

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870777] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Time-Duration-Parse

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870777

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||ppi...@redhat.com
   Fixed In Version||perl-Time-Duration-Parse-0.
   ||15-5.el8
 Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
   Assignee|rc040...@freenet.de |ppi...@redhat.com
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Last Closed||2020-08-21 13:09:45



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
This package is already available in EPEL 8.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870775] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870775

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/27769
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/27770


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870776] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870776

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/27767
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/27768


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870778] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-IO-Interactive

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870778

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/27765
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/27766


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org