Re: Removing unsupported AUTH_DES interfaces in libtirpc.

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 01:21:35PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> About a year ago I stub out the interfaces
> and had them return an error if called. 
> No one has complained... 
> 
> This time I would like to remove interfaces
> so there will be no support whatsoever to 
> pass some upcoming audits... 

Hi,

there are three semi-independent ways how to remove an interface:
1. functional stubbing out (which you said is already done)
2. removal of the function from headers
3. removal of the function from ABI and the resulting required SONAME change

(1. affects programs that use the function at runtime. 2. affects programs
which use the function during compilation. 3. affects all programs that
use the library.)

Part 1. is already done, and we are discussing 3.:

IMHO the best option is not to this at all. SONAME changes in
libraries low in the stack are simply quite problematic. It is OK for
leaf libraries with a limited number of users, but even there barely
so. While we can rebuild distro packages, user programs will still
require relinking, making users angry.

What about just doing 2. instead, so that we can make certain that
*new* builds are not trying to use those functions. 

glibc doesn't change SONAME, libsystemd doesn't change SONAME, etc.
We have symbol versioning, which allows precise dependencies on
specific symbols. Use that instead, just never remove any symbols, but
only add new ones. Symbol versioning is nicely integrated with rpm dependency
autogenerators, so packages get granular dependencies on the specific 
symbols they use.

Returning to the original question: if you absolutely must do an
incompatible SONAME, then please provide a compat package with the old
SONAME. Maybe it could even be built from the same sources.

But it seems that the only motivation in this particular case is legal
pretend-work (since the functions were already stubbed out, just
removing the stub has no functional effect except ticking off a box
somewhere). That just doesn't seem like a good enough motivation to go
through the work for both packagers and users.

> This means I will need to change the SONAME for 
> libtirpc which will effect a large other packages.

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1889575] New: perl-Graph-0.9705 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889575

Bug ID: 1889575
   Summary: perl-Graph-0.9705 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Graph
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: athoscribe...@gmail.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: al...@users.sourceforge.net, athoscribe...@gmail.com,
igor.ra...@gmail.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
w...@gouldfamily.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 0.9705
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.97.04-15.fc33
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Graph/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/7524/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora-33-20201019.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 2/181 (x86_64)

ID: 701335  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/701335
ID: 701345  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/701345

Soft failed openQA tests: 10/181 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

ID: 701287  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/701287
ID: 701306  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/701306
ID: 701333  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/701333
ID: 701346  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_printing
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/701346
ID: 701366  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/701366
ID: 701369  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/701369
ID: 701383  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/701383
ID: 701395  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/701395
ID: 701417  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/701417
ID: 701420  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/701420

Passed openQA tests: 169/181 (x86_64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Re: Mapping tree rework

[William Brown]

> In the first case we could easily mitigate the risk by testing and be fairly 
> confident, in the second case the tests are too complex to achieve the same 
> confidence and we should take this kind of risk only if there were a serious 
> benefit to balance it, but in this case, there are other solutions with less 
> risks.

Actually, I think testing the lib389 tooling would be even harder. You would 
need to recreate the logic of the mapping tree and sorting in python, which may 
have subtle differences compared to the C version. So it would be harder to 
test and gain confidence in. It also doesn't solve the issue that may come 
about from manual misconfiguration.

> I can understand it could seem too conservervative and frustrating but that 
> is the price when working on mature projects. If you do not do that, the 
> product becomes unstable, and users quickly abandon it.

I have worked on this project for a number of years, so I'm well aware of the 
culture in the team. We are a team who values the highest quality of code, with 
customers who demand the very best. To satisfy this as engineers we need to be 
confident in what we do and the work we create. But every day we make changes 
that are bigger than this, or have "more unknowns" and more. It's out attitude 
as a team to quality, our attention to testing, and designs, that make us 
excellent at effectively making changes with confidence.

Because just as easily, when a product has subtle traps, unknown configuration 
bugs and lets people mishandle it, then they also abandon us. Our user 
experience is paramount, and part of that experience is not just stability, but 
reliability and correctness, that changes performed by administrators will work 
and not "silently fail". This bug is just as much a risk for people to abandon 
us because when the server allows misconfiguration to exist that is hard to 
isolate and understand that too can cause a negative user experience.

So here, I think we are going to have to "agree to disagree", but as Mark has 
stated - the fix is created, the PR is open. If you have more configuration 
cases to contribute to the test suite, that would benefit the project 
significantly to ensure the quality of the change, and the quality of the 
mapping tree in general. Our job is to qualify and create scenarios that were 
"unknown" and turn them to "knowns" so we can control changes and have 
confidence in our work.

> On 20 Oct 2020, at 06:10, Mark Reynolds  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> So some of the arguments here is that we are introducing risk for something 
> that is not really a big problem.  Or, simply not worth investing in. From a 
> Red Hat perspective "we" would never fix this, it's just not a problem that 
> comes up enough to justify the work and time.  But...  The initial work has 
> been done by the upstream community (William).

With a corporate interest too, we have a customer at SUSE who has hit this :).

>  So from a RH perspective we are getting this work for free.  Personally I 
> don't see this code change as "very" risky, but this is a very sensitive area 
> of the code.  That being said, I am not opposed to adding it, but...  I think 
> we need much more testing around it to build confidence in the patch.  I 
> would want tests that deal with suffixes of varying size, names, nested 
> levels/complexity:
> 
> o=my_server.com
> 
> dc=example,dc=com
> 
> dc=abcdef,dc=abc  (same length as suffix above - since the patch uses 
> sizing as a way of sorting)
> 
> dc=test,dc=this,dc=patch


Yep, these are some great test ideas. I can add these.

> 
> 
> 
> I want tests that are adding and removing subsuffixes, and sub-subsuffixes, 
> and making sure ldap ops work, and replication, etc.  I want tests that use 
> many different suffixes at the same time and many subsuffixes - some 
> customers have 50 subsuffixes.  Our current CI test suite does not have these 
> kinds of tests, and we need them.

I have already checked with replication suite too, and of course, with ASAN. I 
think that these also are good to have added in general, so I can expand the 
testing to include more suffixes too. 

Do you see 50 subsuffixes in a single level nesting or deeper? I can do some 
shallow nesting and deep nesting hierarchies with that kind of number if you 
want. I think an interesting test would also be to have 

ou=x,ou=y,dc=example,dc=com

dc=example,dc=com

and then add ou=y,dc=example,dc=com in between. Today I think the pre-patched 
MT code would actually not handle this either, but that's a pretty big edge 
case IMO. The real guarantee is that we do assemble the tree correctly.

We thankfully gain confidence already because the CN is already relied on for 
routing and query matching anyway, so we know these values *must* be correct, 
we just need to guarantee the sorting order and tree assembly.

Thanks for the ideas Mark :) 


> 
> As of today I'm not comfortable with the current CI tests to ack this 

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

[Sam Varshavchik]

Arnoldas Skinderis writes:



I'am also have Thikpads and MSI running BIOS and some of those machines   
still are the beast in some terms. Dropping BIOS would pretty much force me  
to use something else.

I don't want to lose Fedora.


Ditto. My Thinkpad W520 is the best damn Fedora laptop. Ever. I have two  
newer laptops, they run Fedora just fine, but the legendary Thinkpad  
keyboard is generations ahead of the crappy chiclets on the other one.


Laughably easy to maintain. In the ten or so years I had it, I only had to  
replace that keyboard once, that's it. Oh, and put a new touchpad sticker,  
to replace the worn-out membrane cover.


This beast, as long as it can still run Fedora, will likely outlive me, and  
I'll have to will it to someone…




pgpXQY6J1Akw_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Candidate RC-1.2 Available Now!

[rawhide]

According to the schedule [1], Fedora 33 Candidate RC-1.2 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan

Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at:
https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/33

You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
locations, and enter results on the Summary page:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_33_RC_1.2_Summary

The individual test result pages are:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_33_RC_1.2_Installation
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_33_RC_1.2_Base
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_33_RC_1.2_Server
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_33_RC_1.2_Cloud
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_33_RC_1.2_Desktop
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_33_RC_1.2_Security_Lab

All RC priority test cases for each of these test pages [2] must
pass in order to meet the RC Release Criteria [3].

Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [4], or on the
test list [5].

Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs:
http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current

[1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-33/f-33-quality-tasks.html
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_RC_Release_Criteria
[4] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa
[5] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/t...@lists.fedoraproject.org/
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1888395] perl-Mail-Message-3.010 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888395

Tom "spot" Callaway  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Last Closed||2020-10-19 21:58:51



--- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway  ---
3.010 is in rawhide.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

spot pushed to perl-Mail-Message (master). "3.010"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2020-10-19 21:48:11 UTC

From 6559a49ca4ed3b560a5f8e56f0904903ef47f11e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Callaway 
Date: Oct 19 2020 21:48:06 +
Subject: 3.010


---

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index abbe3d9..c69583c 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -6,3 +6,4 @@
 /Mail-Message-3.007.tar.gz
 /Mail-Message-3.008.tar.gz
 /Mail-Message-3.009.tar.gz
+/Mail-Message-3.010.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Mail-Message.spec b/perl-Mail-Message.spec
index b856f00..87cd5c7 100644
--- a/perl-Mail-Message.spec
+++ b/perl-Mail-Message.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-Mail-Message
-Version:   3.009
-Release:   4%{?dist}
+Version:   3.010
+Release:   1%{?dist}
 Summary:   MIME message handling
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   https://metacpan.org/release/Mail-Message
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ BuildRequires:perl(Text::Autoformat)
 BuildRequires: perl(Time::HiRes) >= 1.51
 BuildRequires: perl(Time::Zone)
 BuildRequires: perl(URI) >= 1.23
-BuildRequires: perl(User::Identity) >= 0.94
+BuildRequires: perl(User::Identity) >= 1.00
 BuildRequires: perl(User::Identity::Collection::Emails)
 BuildRequires: perl(utf8)
 BuildRequires: perl(vars)
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ MIME message handling code, formerly part of the Mail::Box 
package.
 
 %prep
 %setup -q -n Mail-Message-%{version}
-# The licensing on these test files is unclear. 
+# The licensing on these test files is unclear.
 # They seem to contain content posted publicly to usenet
 # so there is an argument that the content is distributable
 # but its not under a Free license.
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ rm -rf t/203head-listgroup.t t/204head-spamgroup.t
 
 %{?perl_default_filter}
 
-%build 
+%build
 yes y |%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor NO_PACKLIST=1
 make
 
@@ -126,6 +126,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Oct 19 2020 Tom Callaway  - 3.010-1
+- update to 3.010
+
 * Tue Jul 28 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
3.009-4
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 5413614..c56f2c7 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-SHA512 (Mail-Message-3.009.tar.gz) = 
fbc4a0f57b5616d6bde2f759b7f4c90a1c88f0aa06fcc376d92055fc35e4d64374bd62f4080f3a2a2d2ef56955284970b84f4611620f30cb9b6b1a120c1a3897
+SHA512 (Mail-Message-3.010.tar.gz) = 
aa2d38968cfe55a5688a1aaa3442fd87bc7b216ab43db40053f65f5d9bc6b397427a56662062c5a17dd6e62d86aa56c217a6394298e78fc64377fef03771



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mail-Message/c/6559a49ca4ed3b560a5f8e56f0904903ef47f11e?branch=master
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1889399] Upgrade perl-XML-RSS to 1.62

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889399

Tom "spot" Callaway  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2020-10-19 21:35:01



--- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway  ---
1.62 in rawhide.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Re: Mapping tree rework

[Mark Reynolds]

Hi,

So some of the arguments here is that we are introducing risk for 
something that is not really a big problem.  Or, simply not worth 
investing in. From a Red Hat perspective "we" would _never_ fix this, 
it's just not a problem that comes up enough to justify the work and 
time.  But...  The initial work has been done by the upstream community 
(William).  So from a RH perspective we are getting this work for free.  
Personally I don't see this code change as "very" risky, but this is a 
very sensitive area of the code.  That being said, I am not opposed to 
adding it, but...  I think we need much more testing around it to build 
confidence in the patch.  I would want tests that deal with suffixes of 
varying size, names, nested levels/complexity:


    o=my_server.com

    dc=example,dc=com

    dc=abcdef,dc=abc  (same length as suffix above - since the patch 
uses sizing as a way of sorting)


    dc=test,dc=this,dc=patch


I want tests that are adding and removing subsuffixes, and 
sub-subsuffixes, and making sure ldap ops work, and replication, etc.  I 
want tests that use many different suffixes at the same time and many 
subsuffixes - some customers have 50 subsuffixes. Our current CI test 
suite does not have these kinds of tests, and we need them.


As of today I'm not comfortable with the current CI tests to ack this 
patch, but if we can ramp it up and cover more scenarios it would be a 
step in the right direction.  This is all just my humble opinion, we are 
all still just talking :-)


Mark




On 10/19/20 6:47 AM, Pierre Rogier wrote:

Hi William,

Things are not black and white:
   there is a huge difference between a fix with limited impact (like 
adding some check in configuration tools or in the server) and 
redesigning something that is used in many different contexts for 
every request handled by the server ...


In the first case we could easily mitigate the risk by testing and be 
fairly confident, in the second case the tests are too complex to 
achieve the same confidence and we should take this kind of risk only 
if there were a serious benefit to balance it, but in this case, there 
are other solutions with less risks.


I can understand it could seem too conservervative and frustrating but 
that is the price when working on mature projects. If you do not do 
that, the product becomes unstable, and users quickly abandon it.


Regards,
   Pierre


On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 1:27 AM William Brown > wrote:




> On 16 Oct 2020, at 17:48, Pierre Rogier mailto:prog...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi William,
> I agree with your architecture points and that is why I said my
proposal is a less appealing trade off.
>
> My real concern is your last point:
>  we just do not know and IMHO we are unable to predict what (or
if) config will cause problems, and I am afraid we will only
discover it when people start to complain.
> So I still think that the benefit/risk ratio is bad)
>

I think this wasn't my point. The thing is *any* change will have
that "unknown" risk. Our job is to qualify and identify as many of
those risks as we can, to remove them as unknowns. Think about the
work recently to merge the changelog to the main db, or BDB to
LMDB work, even changing from perl to python for installation.
These are all significantly larger changes, which would be "much
riskier" but all of them have been managed effectively by the team
communicating, coordinating, analysing, designing and testing changes.

So I really don't accept this "unknown" risk argument. I have laid
out a design that explores the configuration, how it works today
and how the values are currently trusted, and a process to manage
and understand this change in a way to minimise the risk. There
are associated tests, and it passes with address sanitiser, and
other test cases for mapping trees, replication and others.

If we just say "unknown risk" at every change we make we'd never
progress. We may as well packup and go home, the project is completed.

So I still stand by my design and the PR I have submitted in this
case, and if there are concerns about esoteric configurations,
then we should identify and understand them too beyond the testing
I have already provided.

—
Sincerely,

William Brown

Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs, Australia
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

To unsubscribe send an email to
389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

[PGNet Dev]

On 10/19/20 11:33 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:

I guess those machines are more or less the cut-off point and slower machines
are not worth keeping around. But that means that there still are a ton
of BIOS machines worth keeping around.

Note that even most sandy bridge machines do not support UEFI and those
machines are still very capable.



I've got ~30 non-EFI Acer TimelineX Aspire 3820Ts, circa ~ 2009-10 still in 
'production' across the enterprise. e.g.,

dmesg | grep DMI:
[0.00] DMI: Acer Aspire 3820/JM31_CP, BIOS V1.19 
10/27/2010

They currently run (recently migrated)

grep _NAME /etc/os-release
PRETTY_NAME="Fedora 32 (Server Edition)"
CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:32"

uname -rm
5.8.15-201.fc32.x86_64 x86_64

**ALL* have

cat /proc/cpuinfo |grep "^model name"
model name  : Intel(R) Core(TM) i3 CPU   M 370  @ 
2.40GHz

, 8GB RAM

free
totalusedfree  shared  
buff/cache   available
Mem:7806944  673488 3105532  102896 4027924 
6733392
Swap:   8388604   0 8388604

, 500GB ssds,

hwinfo --disk | grep Device:
Device: "CT1000MX500SSD1"

and run

libreoffice-x11-6.4.7.2-1.fc32.x86_64
VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.14_140239_fedora32-1.x86_64 (Win10 guests)
Firefox 81.0.2
Thunderbird 78.3.3

as well as

java --version
openjdk 15 2020-09-15
OpenJDK Runtime Environment 20.9 (build 15+36)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 20.9 (build 15+36, mixed mode, sharing)

a number run

PhpStorm 2020.3 EAP
Build #PS-203.4818.52, built on October 15, 2020

&/or

Eclipse Platform
Version: 2020-03 (4.15)
Build id: I20200305-0155

My own manages nginx/php & mariadb quite nicely as well.

Are these screamin' fast?  Do they have 8K screens to play video games on?  No. 
 Of course not.

But they are *perfectly* serviceable/functional; and that's just one model of 
'oldies' around here.


All that^ is _still_ more 'juice' than many a VPS ... what it requires to make 
old boxes 'serve well' is some due diligence on right-sizing your 
kernel/app/server/tool/etc configs.  AND a distro (even if it's a DIY LFS ...) 
that makes it possible.



It really just is way too early / too soon to cut of BIOS booting support.


big emphasis on the 'way'.

i for one am certainly glad that that's the decision that's been taken, and 
that i won't have to face migrating to yet-another-OS because of bad enterprise 
policy decisions.

esp, since Fedora's grown on me  ...
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1889499] New: perl-Future-0.46 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889499

Bug ID: 1889499
   Summary: perl-Future-0.46 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Future
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: emman...@seyman.fr, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 0.46
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.45-3.fc33
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Future/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/11795/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1889390] Upgrade perl-Authen-Radius to 0.32

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889390

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Authen-Radius-0.32-1.f
   ||c34
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
   Assignee|andr...@bawue.net   |p...@city-fan.org
Last Closed||2020-10-19 19:00:27



--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth  ---
Build done:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=53779834


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1888288] perl-EV in epel8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888288

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-da3639cc2e has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-da3639cc2e


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 10/19/20 6:47 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> The issue is that while 'moore's' law was no longer doubling every 18months 
> it was still working and tasks had to be rewritten to work with more 
> cores/threads/etc. As that happened the software's need for more CPU power 
> has increased to the point were a 10+ year computer isn't very useful for 
> 'modern' software (browser and various applications). Instead if you want to 
> have something work on a 2012 system well.. just use software from 2012.  It 
> is still available. Sure you can install Linux on that 15 year old computer 
> but if you have to tell the user well you can't actually use a browser, an 
> editor or half the things you can do on your cheapest smart-phone.. what use 
> is that computer? 

My daughter actually took a 12+ years old (one of the first 64 bit core 2 duo
models) laptop (Dell Latitude E6400) with her to school for a project last week
and happily ran a browser (latest firefox) and libreoffice on it without issues.

Sure I've probably upgraded the RAM a bit at some point (I don't remember
when I did that, so a long time ago) and I dropped in a SSD something like
5 years ago I guess. But with those 2 upgrades it still is a fine machine
for a lot of things.

And the PC in the living room used for netflix, disney+ and primevideo
is another core 2 duo (one of the later gens) models happily doing what
we ask of it; and my wife's home-office machine is another ...

I guess those machines are more or less the cut-off point and slower machines
are not worth keeping around. But that means that there still are a ton
of BIOS machines worth keeping around.

Note that even most sandy bridge machines do not support UEFI and those
machines are still very capable.

It really just is way too early / too soon to cut of BIOS booting support.

Regards,

Hans
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

[Peter Robinson]

> >> This proposal was soundly rejected, so don't worry about it.
> >
> > That's great news. Thank you!
> I am not thrilled that this has been rejected since efi support is not
> so good on Fedora.

How do you mean, it's supported quite well IMO with support for things
like secure boot and UEFI capsule updates for updating system firmware
I feel it's in quite good state with people improving on things
constantly.

> Devices that are BIOS can IIRC still use efi using a boot tool
> installed to the MBR which emulates EFI
> and than loads the EFI loader. This would be a one time step.

Why bother, just adds an extra layer of complexity with no added
benefits that UEFI provides.

> Hopefully Fedora will have enough resources to support systemd-boot on
> Fedora Silverblue,
> which has never worked so far due to ostree naming conventions

I see that less likely because of the need to have a already stretched
team supporting yet another boot path.

> https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/1951
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

[Gary Buhrmaster]

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 5:46 PM Damian Ivanov  wrote:
>
> >> This proposal was soundly rejected, so don't worry about it.
> >
> > That's great news. Thank you!
> I am not thrilled that this has been rejected since efi support is not
> so good on Fedora.
> Devices that are BIOS can IIRC still use efi using a boot tool
> installed to the MBR which emulates EFI
> and than loads the EFI loader. This would be a one time step.

I believe EFI emulation would be too big to fit in the
446 bytes available in the MBR, so one would need
a biosboot partition for that EFI emulator, but the
other issue (as I recall) was that the EFI emulation
had been using IP that may not be appropriately
"free" (fat32?).  Perhaps now that that IP has been
contributed to OIN (and the various legal reviews
and processes for Fedora to properly utilize those
patents are complete) there may be a future path
forward (if someone is so motivated).
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1889027] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.42 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889027



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-f4aa4d4e97 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-f4aa4d4e97`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f4aa4d4e97

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1888513] perl-Math-FFT-1.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888513



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-c36042162b has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-c36042162b`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c36042162b

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1882957] perl-Unicode-Collate-1.29 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882957



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881518] perl-Unicode-Collate-1.28 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881518



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1882958] perl-MIME-Base64-3.16 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882958



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1879600] perl-DB_File-1.854 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879600



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1885368] perl-Digest-MD5-2.58 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885368



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1887366] perl-Pod-Usage-2.01 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887366



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-4483df847e has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-4483df847e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1879217] perl-IO-Socket-IP-0.41 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879217



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883498] perl-Module-Load-0.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883498



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1884870] perl-File-Temp-0.2311 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884870



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1880857] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200920 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880857



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-4483df847e has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-4483df847e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1882938] perl-File-Temp-0.2310 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882938



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1887366] perl-Pod-Usage-2.01 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887366



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870878] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200820 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870878



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870861] perl-version-0.9927 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870861



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1871053] perl-Module-Load-Conditional-0.74 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871053



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881646] perl-version-0.9928 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881646



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1880857] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200920 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880857



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1884931] perl-Pod-Checker-1.74 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884931



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1888006] perl-DB_File-1.855 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888006



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-0c453a3f10

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881518] perl-Unicode-Collate-1.28 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881518



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1880857] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200920 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880857



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-bd107721fe has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-bd107721fe

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883498] perl-Module-Load-0.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883498



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1884931] perl-Pod-Checker-1.74 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884931

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1884870] perl-File-Temp-0.2311 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884870

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1882957] perl-Unicode-Collate-1.29 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882957



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1885368] perl-Digest-MD5-2.58 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885368

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1887366] perl-Pod-Usage-2.01 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887366

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1888006] perl-DB_File-1.855 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888006

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881646] perl-version-0.9928 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881646



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1882958] perl-MIME-Base64-3.16 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882958



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870878] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200820 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870878



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

[Damian Ivanov]

>> This proposal was soundly rejected, so don't worry about it.
>
> That's great news. Thank you!
I am not thrilled that this has been rejected since efi support is not
so good on Fedora.
Devices that are BIOS can IIRC still use efi using a boot tool
installed to the MBR which emulates EFI
and than loads the EFI loader. This would be a one time step.

Hopefully Fedora will have enough resources to support systemd-boot on
Fedora Silverblue,
which has never worked so far due to ostree naming conventions
https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/1951
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870861] perl-version-0.9927 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870861



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1880857] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200920 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880857



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1882938] perl-File-Temp-0.2310 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882938



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1879217] perl-IO-Socket-IP-0.41 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879217



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1879600] perl-DB_File-1.854 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879600



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1871053] perl-Module-Load-Conditional-0.74 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871053



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-6e1fd68a2e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

[Arnoldas Skinderis]

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 8:27 PM Michael Catanzaro 
wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 8:16 pm, Arnoldas Skinderis
>  wrote:
> > I'am also have Thikpads and MSI running BIOS and some of those
> > machines  still are the beast in some terms. Dropping BIOS would
> > pretty much force me to use something else.
> > I don't want to lose Fedora.
>
> This proposal was soundly rejected, so don't worry about it.
>

That's great news. Thank you!


>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 8:16 pm, Arnoldas Skinderis 
 wrote:
I'am also have Thikpads and MSI running BIOS and some of those 
machines  still are the beast in some terms. Dropping BIOS would 
pretty much force me to use something else.

I don't want to lose Fedora.


This proposal was soundly rejected, so don't worry about it.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1889089] perl-Tk-TableMatrix-1.25 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889089

Upstream Release Monitoring  
changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|perl-Tk-TableMatrix-1.24 is |perl-Tk-TableMatrix-1.25 is
   |available   |available



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Latest upstream release: 1.25
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.23-40.fc33
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Tk-TableMatrix/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/14404/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Removing unsupported AUTH_DES interfaces in libtirpc.

[Steve Dickson]

Hello,

About a year ago I stub out the interfaces
and had them return an error if called. 
No one has complained... 

This time I would like to remove interfaces
so there will be no support whatsoever to 
pass some upcoming audits... 

This means I will need to change the SONAME for 
libtirpc which will effect a large other packages.

The last time I did this all hell broke out so
I'm trying to avoid that this time.

So can someone please point me to the correct
way to change a SONAME without cause total chaos

tia,

steved.


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

[Arnoldas Skinderis]

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 7:48 PM Stephen John Smoogen 
wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 02:15, Subsentient 
> wrote:
>
>> I figure I'll add my two cents for as little as that's worth.
>>
>> Personally, I use extlinux with a custom, barebones configuration. On my
>> EFI systems, I use syslinux EFI. I like the simplicity of syntax for
>> syslinux's configuration and how small it is, but that's me, and it's not
>> going to be everyone's preference.
>>
>> I also own several legacy BIOS based systems that cannot support EFI, and
>> they work fine, including my daily driver Thinkpad T410.
>> While I know it will still be possible for *very* advanced Linux users
>> such as me to get Fedora working on BIOS systems with my own bootloader of
>> choice even if Fedora drops support, it would create a maintenance nuisance
>> if I need to boot a recovery ISO etc or reinstall Fedora from scratch, e.g.
>> in drive failure. And, of course, most Fedora users can't easily swap out a
>> bootloader, they just haven't spent the energy learning those parts of the
>> OS.
>>
>> Though, that would hardly be my concern. As sad as I was to see i686
>> support dropped, I could at least understand the reasoning behind it, given
>> how few people used it and how large of a maintenance task it was. I myself
>> didn't really use any systems that needed it. This, however, is different.
>>
>> Personally, I despise GRUB2, that's why I switched to syslinux when
>> distros dropped GRUB1. I find GRUB2 very bloated, needlessly complicated,
>> with too many magic black boxes.
>> That said, dropping BIOS support simply to adopt another bootloader in
>> its place is a deeply disturbing proposition. There are many BIOS based
>> systems still in service, and there will be for quite some time.
>>
>> My Thinkpad was manufactured in 2011 and still only supports BIOS. In
>> 2012, I started seeing EFI-based PCs on the market due to Windows 8 and
>> MSFT's push for secure boot. Apple was an exception, they started using EFI
>> as soon as they switched to Intel. The rest of the world remained on BIOS
>> until 2012.
>>
>> Are you seriously considering dropping support for all systems older than
>> 8 years of age? Even if I could mostly work around such a decision, it
>> would anger me and I imagine a great many other users, purely on
>> ideological grounds. I would consider switching distributions, and I've
>> been a Fedora loyalist since 2009.
>>
>> Do you remember when Linux was touted as a lightweight alternative for
>> older PCs, and you could install flagship distros on grandma's PC to
>> breathe new life into it? I do. I don't want to live in the timeline where
>> the only distros that run on such things are puppy linux and similar.
>>
>
>
I'am also have Thikpads and MSI running BIOS and some of those machines
still are the beast in some terms. Dropping BIOS would pretty much force me
to use something else.
I don't want to lose Fedora.


> I think the issue is that people have rose coloured glasses about how much
> 'life' we could get out of someone's older PC... and how old that desktop
> was. In the 30 years I have worked in PC/Unix, I would say that before
> 2004, it was rare that it breathed new life into 2+ year old technology as
> much as that the Linux kernel worked with all the hardware by then. Working
> on an 1985 i386 in 1993 with Linux was great, but it was not any faster
> than Windows 3.11 for a lot of things. A i486 with Linux was not running as
> 'fast' as a i586 with Windows 95 in 1997. You could get some better usage
> from older hardware as long as you kept the tasks run meant to run in such
> a 'limited' environment. But as soon as Grandpa wanted to open Netscape or
> Staroffice.. you would watch a mouse crawl as you ran out of swap.
>
> Having upgraded lots of "Grand-pa's" computer for 2 decades, I can say
> that their computers were rarely older than 4-5 years old until after 2008.
> It is only after Moore's law 'broke' after 2003 stopped seeing doubling cpu
> speeds every 18 months that trying to keep hardware useful longer than 5
> years has been possible. When clock speeds were no longer doubling and
> 'standard' hardware memory bought came in a window of 2GB to 4 GB for a
> decade, being able to keep hardware longer really started happening. At
> that point, most of the time there was no giant performance boost for most
> things people did on the computer and unless you were into gaming, or
> professions using a CPU to its max... most people stuck with the old stuff.
>
> The issue is that while 'moore's' law was no longer doubling every
> 18months it was still working and tasks had to be rewritten to work with
> more cores/threads/etc. As that happened the software's need for more CPU
> power has increased to the point were a 10+ year computer isn't very useful
> for 'modern' software (browser and various applications). Instead if you
> want to have something work on a 2012 system well.. just use software from
> 2012.  It 

[Bug 1888513] perl-Math-FFT-1.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888513

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-259124334a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-259124334a`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-259124334a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1889027] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.42 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889027

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-856d9e8b4a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-856d9e8b4a`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-856d9e8b4a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883530] Add perl-Curses-UI to EPEL8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883530

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com   |david.hanneq...@gmail.com



--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar  ---
The package owner is hvad. hvad, could you please reset the EPEL default
assignee at ? Could you also
please grant me commit or admin access to this package, if you are not
interested in EPEL?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1889341] perl-Test-Run-CmdLine-0.0132 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889341



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-53e7947f45 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-53e7947f45


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1889341] perl-Test-Run-CmdLine-0.0132 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889341



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-c565d127ca has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c565d127ca


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 02:15, Subsentient  wrote:

> I figure I'll add my two cents for as little as that's worth.
>
> Personally, I use extlinux with a custom, barebones configuration. On my
> EFI systems, I use syslinux EFI. I like the simplicity of syntax for
> syslinux's configuration and how small it is, but that's me, and it's not
> going to be everyone's preference.
>
> I also own several legacy BIOS based systems that cannot support EFI, and
> they work fine, including my daily driver Thinkpad T410.
> While I know it will still be possible for *very* advanced Linux users
> such as me to get Fedora working on BIOS systems with my own bootloader of
> choice even if Fedora drops support, it would create a maintenance nuisance
> if I need to boot a recovery ISO etc or reinstall Fedora from scratch, e.g.
> in drive failure. And, of course, most Fedora users can't easily swap out a
> bootloader, they just haven't spent the energy learning those parts of the
> OS.
>
> Though, that would hardly be my concern. As sad as I was to see i686
> support dropped, I could at least understand the reasoning behind it, given
> how few people used it and how large of a maintenance task it was. I myself
> didn't really use any systems that needed it. This, however, is different.
>
> Personally, I despise GRUB2, that's why I switched to syslinux when
> distros dropped GRUB1. I find GRUB2 very bloated, needlessly complicated,
> with too many magic black boxes.
> That said, dropping BIOS support simply to adopt another bootloader in its
> place is a deeply disturbing proposition. There are many BIOS based systems
> still in service, and there will be for quite some time.
>
> My Thinkpad was manufactured in 2011 and still only supports BIOS. In
> 2012, I started seeing EFI-based PCs on the market due to Windows 8 and
> MSFT's push for secure boot. Apple was an exception, they started using EFI
> as soon as they switched to Intel. The rest of the world remained on BIOS
> until 2012.
>
> Are you seriously considering dropping support for all systems older than
> 8 years of age? Even if I could mostly work around such a decision, it
> would anger me and I imagine a great many other users, purely on
> ideological grounds. I would consider switching distributions, and I've
> been a Fedora loyalist since 2009.
>
> Do you remember when Linux was touted as a lightweight alternative for
> older PCs, and you could install flagship distros on grandma's PC to
> breathe new life into it? I do. I don't want to live in the timeline where
> the only distros that run on such things are puppy linux and similar.
>

I think the issue is that people have rose coloured glasses about how much
'life' we could get out of someone's older PC... and how old that desktop
was. In the 30 years I have worked in PC/Unix, I would say that before
2004, it was rare that it breathed new life into 2+ year old technology as
much as that the Linux kernel worked with all the hardware by then. Working
on an 1985 i386 in 1993 with Linux was great, but it was not any faster
than Windows 3.11 for a lot of things. A i486 with Linux was not running as
'fast' as a i586 with Windows 95 in 1997. You could get some better usage
from older hardware as long as you kept the tasks run meant to run in such
a 'limited' environment. But as soon as Grandpa wanted to open Netscape or
Staroffice.. you would watch a mouse crawl as you ran out of swap.

Having upgraded lots of "Grand-pa's" computer for 2 decades, I can say that
their computers were rarely older than 4-5 years old until after 2008. It
is only after Moore's law 'broke' after 2003 stopped seeing doubling cpu
speeds every 18 months that trying to keep hardware useful longer than 5
years has been possible. When clock speeds were no longer doubling and
'standard' hardware memory bought came in a window of 2GB to 4 GB for a
decade, being able to keep hardware longer really started happening. At
that point, most of the time there was no giant performance boost for most
things people did on the computer and unless you were into gaming, or
professions using a CPU to its max... most people stuck with the old stuff.

The issue is that while 'moore's' law was no longer doubling every 18months
it was still working and tasks had to be rewritten to work with more
cores/threads/etc. As that happened the software's need for more CPU power
has increased to the point were a 10+ year computer isn't very useful for
'modern' software (browser and various applications). Instead if you want
to have something work on a 2012 system well.. just use software from
2012.  It is still available. Sure you can install Linux on that 15 year
old computer but if you have to tell the user well you can't actually use a
browser, an editor or half the things you can do on your cheapest
smart-phone.. what use is that computer?



> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an 

[Bug 1889341] perl-Test-Run-CmdLine-0.0132 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889341

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |MODIFIED
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar  ---
An enhancement release suitable for all Fedoras.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883530] Add perl-Curses-UI to EPEL8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883530

Dave Johansen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|davejohan...@gmail.com  |ppi...@redhat.com




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Orphaned packages (including pdc-client) looking for new maintainers

[Miro Hrončok]

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or
retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
package will be retired when the affected package gets retired.

Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/

This report is available at:
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2020-10-19.txt
grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.

For human readable dependency chains, see https://packager.fedorainfracloud.org/
For all orphaned packages, see https://packager.fedorainfracloud.org/orphan

  Package   (co)maintainersStatus Change

apache-commons-configuration   fnasser, mizdebsk, orphan, spike1 weeks ago
celt071orphan  0 weeks ago
huborphan, ralph, sgallagh 2 weeks ago
jboss-interceptors-1.2-api orphan  5 weeks ago
jboss-jsf-2.1-api  orphan  1 weeks ago
log4j12mizdebsk, orphan5 weeks ago
metadata-extractor2cquad, orphan   1 weeks ago
nodejs-http-signature  nodejs-sig, orphan, patches 5 weeks ago
nodejs-node-static nodejs-sig, orphan, tdawson 5 weeks ago
nodejs-noptnodejs-sig, orphan, patches 5 weeks ago
pdc-client bliu, chcao, cheng, chuzhang,   1 weeks ago
   lholecek, lsedlar, nphilipp,
   orphan
perl-Math-FFT  orphan  0 weeks ago
pipsi  orphan, python-sig  3 weeks ago
powermock  dchen, jerboaa, lef, neugens,   2 weeks ago
   orphan
pyqtrailer orphan  1 weeks ago
python-XStatic-jQuery  openstack-sig, orphan, rdopiera 2 weeks ago
python-beanbag orphan  1 weeks ago
python-dpath   orphan  1 weeks ago
python-libsass orphan  1 weeks ago
pytrailer  orphan  1 weeks ago
vdr-skinsoppalusikka   orphan  4 weeks ago
vtun   orphan  3 weeks ago

The following packages require above mentioned packages:
Depending on: celt071 (1), status change: 2020-10-17 (0 weeks ago)
mumble (maintained by: carlwgeorge)
mumble-1.3.2-2.fc34.src requires celt071-devel = 0.7.1-20.fc33
mumble-1.3.2-2.fc34.x86_64 requires celt071(x86-64) = 
0.7.1-20.fc33

Depending on: jboss-interceptors-1.2-api (1), status change: 2020-09-13 (5 weeks 
ago)

geronimo-jcdi-1.1-api (maintained by: jjelen)
		geronimo-jcdi-1.1-api-1.0-10.fc33.src requires 
mvn(org.jboss.spec.javax.interceptor:jboss-interceptors-api_1.2_spec) = 1.0.1.Final


Depending on: jboss-jsf-2.1-api (1), status change: 2020-10-06 (1 weeks ago)
apache-commons-chain (maintained by: jjelen)
		apache-commons-chain-1.2-24.fc33.noarch requires 
mvn(org.jboss.spec.javax.faces:jboss-jsf-api_2.1_spec) = 2.0.2.Final
		apache-commons-chain-1.2-24.fc33.src requires 
mvn(org.jboss.spec.javax.faces:jboss-jsf-api_2.1_spec) = 2.0.2.Final


Depending on: log4j12 (3), status change: 2020-09-13 (5 weeks ago)
apache-commons-configuration (maintained by: fnasser, mizdebsk, orphan, 
spike)
		apache-commons-configuration-1.10-15.fc32.src requires mvn(log4j:log4j:1.2.17) 
= 1.2.17


apache-log4j-extras (maintained by: coolsvap, gil, moceap)
		apache-log4j-extras-1.2.17.1-18.fc33.noarch requires mvn(log4j:log4j:1.2.17) = 
1.2.17

apache-log4j-extras-1.2.17.1-18.fc33.src requires 
mvn(log4j:log4j:1.2.17) = 1.2.17

azureus (maintained by: djuran)
azureus-5.7.6.0-13.fc34.noarch requires log4j12 = 1.2.17-30.fc34
azureus-5.7.6.0-13.fc34.src requires log4j12 = 1.2.17-30.fc34

Depending on: nodejs-nopt (2), status change: 2020-09-08 (5 weeks ago)
nodejs-markdown (maintained by: nodejs-sig, patches, sdgathman)
nodejs-markdown-0.5.0-13.fc32.noarch requires npm(nopt) = 3.0.6

nodejs-touch (maintained by: jsmith)
 

Re: F33 beta: where are my Rust packages?

[Artur Frenszek-Iwicki]

Big thanks, these were very helpful.

If anyone's interested, here are the bodhi updates for the packages:
- copydeps: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6b5ea5655a
- desed: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-bbc06105dd

A.FI.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1889399] New: Upgrade perl-XML-RSS to 1.62

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889399

Bug ID: 1889399
   Summary: Upgrade perl-XML-RSS to 1.62
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-XML-RSS
  Assignee: spo...@gmail.com
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, spo...@gmail.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest Fedora delivers 1.61 version. Upstream released 1.62. When you have free
time, please upgrade it.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1889396] New: Upgrade perl-Term-Shell to 0.12

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889396

Bug ID: 1889396
   Summary: Upgrade perl-Term-Shell to 0.12
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Term-Shell
  Assignee: steve.tray...@cern.ch
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
steve.tray...@cern.ch
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest Fedora delivers 0.11 version. Upstream released 0.12. When you have free
time, please upgrade it.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1889392] New: Upgrade perl-Curses to 1.37

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889392

Bug ID: 1889392
   Summary: Upgrade perl-Curses to 1.37
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Curses
  Assignee: steve.tray...@cern.ch
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
steve.tray...@cern.ch
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest Fedora delivers 1.36 version. Upstream released 1.37. When you have free
time, please upgrade it.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1889390] New: Upgrade perl-Authen-Radius to 0.32

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889390

Bug ID: 1889390
   Summary: Upgrade perl-Authen-Radius to 0.32
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Authen-Radius
  Assignee: andr...@bawue.net
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: andr...@bawue.net, p...@city-fan.org,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest Fedora delivers 0.31 version. Upstream released 0.32. When you have free
time, please upgrade it.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora-IoT-33-20201019.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201016.0):

ID: 700991  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700991

Passed openQA tests: 15/16 (x86_64)

Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default_upload: 
System load changed from 0.05 to 0.23
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/698471#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700992#downloads
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora-33-20201019.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 10/181 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-33-20201018.n.0):

ID: 700715  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700715
ID: 700734  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700734
ID: 700761  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700761
ID: 700774  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_printing
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700774
ID: 700794  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700794
ID: 700797  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700797
ID: 700811  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700811
ID: 700823  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700823
ID: 700845  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700845
ID: 700848  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700848

Passed openQA tests: 171/181 (x86_64)

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi: 
System load changed from 0.06 to 0.18
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/73#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700723#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso 
install_default_upload: 
Used swap changed from 32 MiB to 18 MiB
System load changed from 0.76 to 0.64
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700038#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700758#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso 
install_default@uefi: 
Used swap changed from 33 MiB to 18 MiB
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700040#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700760#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload: 
Used mem changed from 1198 MiB to 909 MiB
Used swap changed from 36 MiB to 9 MiB
System load changed from 0.93 to 1.43
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700057#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700777#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi: 
Used swap changed from 10 MiB to 9 MiB
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700198#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700778#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default_upload: 
Used swap changed from 23 MiB to 28 MiB
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700074#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700794#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default@uefi: 
System load changed from 0.33 to 0.50
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700077#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700797#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde: 
Used swap changed from 5 MiB to 5 MiB
Average CPU usage changed from 7.62857143 to 22.2667
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700118#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700838#downloads


-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora-Rawhide-20201019.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** 
below

Failed openQA tests: 95/181 (x86_64)

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20201018.n.0):

ID: 700379  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700379
ID: 700380  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700380
ID: 700386  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700386
ID: 700398  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700398
ID: 700417  Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso memory_check@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700417
ID: 700418  Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700418
ID: 700421  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700421
ID: 700439  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700439
ID: 700480  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700480
ID: 700507  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700507
ID: 700508  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700508
ID: 700525  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700525
ID: 700528  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700528
ID: 700541  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700541
ID: 700611  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700611
ID: 700612  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700612
ID: 700613  Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700613
ID: 700614  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700614
ID: 700615  Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700615
ID: 700616  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700616
ID: 700632  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_resize_lvm
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700632
ID: 700633  Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700633
ID: 700634  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700634
ID: 700641  Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700641
ID: 700647  Test: x86_64 universal install_multi **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700647
ID: 700652  Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700652
ID: 700653  Test: x86_64 universal install_sata **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700653
ID: 700654  Test: x86_64 universal install_resize_lvm
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700654
ID: 700655  Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700655
ID: 700656  Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_partial
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700656
ID: 700657  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700657
ID: 700658  Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_graphical 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700658
ID: 700659  Test: x86_64 universal install_sata@uefi **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700659
ID: 700660  Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700660
ID: 700661  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700661
ID: 700662  Test: x86_64 universal install_multi_empty
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700662
ID: 700663  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700663
ID: 700688  Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/700688
ID: 700690  Test: x86_64 universal install_multi@uefi **GATING**
URL: 

[Test-Announce] Fedora-IoT 33 RC 20201019.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

[rawhide]

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 33 RC 20201019.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan

Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at:
https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/33iot

You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
locations, and enter results on the Summary page:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora-IoT_33_RC_20201019.0_Summary

The individual test result pages are:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora-IoT_33_RC_20201019.0_General

Thank you for testing!
-- 
Mail generated by relvalconsumer: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relvalconsumer
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Package downgrades from fedora 32 -> fedora 33 (updated + annotated list inside)

[Eugene Syromiatnikov]

On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 12:53:28AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> - strace is newer in 32 than in 33:
>   0:5.8-1.fc32 > 0:5.7.0.6.7ab6-1.fc33

FWIW, the 5.9-1 version is available (but not in stable).
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1889341] perl-Test-Run-CmdLine-0.0132 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889341

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Run-CmdLine-0.013
   ||2-1.fc34
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
   Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com   |jples...@redhat.com
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Last Closed||2020-10-19 13:13:02




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 33 compose report: 20201019.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-33-20201018.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20201019.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   0 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   0 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =

= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1888513] perl-Math-FFT-1.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888513



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-c36042162b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c36042162b


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1888513] perl-Math-FFT-1.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888513



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-259124334a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-259124334a


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1888513] perl-Math-FFT-1.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888513



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-5a8de7186f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5a8de7186f


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20201019.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201018.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201019.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   41
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   1.56 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   407.56 KiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  adobe-afdko-3.5.1-1.fc34
Old package:  adobe-afdko-3.4.0-3.fc33
Summary:  Adobe Font Development Kit for OpenType
RPMs: adobe-afdko
Size: 4.63 MiB
Size change:  10.51 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 16 2020 Vishal Vijayraghavan  - 3.5.1-1
  - Build for latest release 3.5.1


Package:  apitrace-9.0-0.10.git1aa8391.fc34
Old package:  apitrace-9.0-0.9.git433f99b.fc33
Summary:  Tools for tracing OpenGL
RPMs: apitrace apitrace-gui apitrace-libs
Size: 17.83 MiB
Size change:  150.89 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Oct 18 2020 Sandro Mani  - 9.0-0.10.git1aa8391
  - Update to git 1aa8391


Package:  bpytop-1.0.43-1.fc34
Old package:  bpytop-1.0.42-1.fc34
Summary:  Linux/OSX/FreeBSD resource monitor
RPMs: bpytop
Size: 64.55 KiB
Size change:  286 B
Changelog:
  * Sun Oct 18 2020 Artem Polishchuk  - 1.0.43-1
  - build(update): 1.0.43


Package:  chisel-1.7.2-1.fc34
Old package:  chisel-1.7.1-1.fc34
Summary:  TCP tunnel over HTTP
RPMs: chisel golang-github-jpillora-chisel-devel
Size: 14.17 MiB
Size change:  -9.22 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Oct 18 2020 Fabian Affolter  - 1.7.2-1
  - Update ot latest upstream release 1.7.2 (#1889172)


Package:  chromium-86.0.4240.75-1.fc34
Old package:  chromium-85.0.4183.121-2.fc34
Summary:  A WebKit (Blink) powered web browser
RPMs: chrome-remote-desktop chromedriver chromium chromium-common 
chromium-headless
Size: 420.07 MiB
Size change:  445.46 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Oct 14 2020 Tom Callaway  - 86.0.4240.75-1
  - update to 86.0.4240.75


Package:  cockpit-230-1.fc34
Old package:  cockpit-229-1.fc34
Summary:  Web Console for Linux servers
RPMs: cockpit cockpit-bridge cockpit-dashboard cockpit-doc 
cockpit-kdump cockpit-machines cockpit-networkmanager cockpit-packagekit 
cockpit-pcp cockpit-selinux cockpit-sosreport cockpit-storaged cockpit-system 
cockpit-tests cockpit-ws
Size: 19.54 MiB
Size change:  150.76 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Oct 14 2020 Sanne Raymaekers  - 230-1
  - storage: List entries from /etc/crypttab that are still locked


Package:  dlib-19.20-7.fc34
Old package:  dlib-19.20-6.fc33
Summary:  A modern C++ toolkit containing machine learning algorithms
RPMs: dlib dlib-devel dlib-doc python3-dlib
Size: 27.75 MiB
Size change:  -3.71 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 02 2020 Miro Hron??ok  
 - 19.20-7
  - Changes/Python Upstream Architecture Names


Package:  dummy-test-package-crested-0-1925
Old package:  dummy-test-package-crested-0-1912
Summary:  Dummy Test Package called Crested
RPMs: dummy-test-package-crested
Size: 124.98 KiB
Size change:  844 B
Changelog:
  * Sun Oct 18 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1913
  - rebuilt

  * Sun Oct 18 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1914
  - rebuilt

  * Sun Oct 18 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1915
  - rebuilt

  * Sun Oct 18 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1916
  - rebuilt

  * Sun Oct 18 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1917
  - rebuilt

  * Sun Oct 18 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1918
  - rebuilt

  * Sun Oct 18 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1919
  - rebuilt

  * Sun Oct 18 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1920
  - rebuilt

  * Sun Oct 18 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1921
  - rebuilt

  * Sun Oct 18 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1922
  - rebuilt

  * Sun Oct 18 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1923
  - rebuilt

  * Mon Oct 19 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1924
  - rebuilt

  * Mon Oct 19 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1925
  - rebuilt


Package:  dummy-test-package-gloster-0-1811.fc34
Old package:  dummy-test-package-gloster-0-1797.fc34
Summary:  Dummy Test Package called Gloster
RPMs: dummy-test-package-gloster
Size: 116.83 KiB
Size change:  921 B
Changelog:
  * Sun Oct 18 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1798
  - rebuilt

  * Sun Oct 18 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1799
  - rebuilt

  * Sun Oct 18 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1800
  - rebuilt

  * Sun Oct 18 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1801
  - rebuilt

  * Sun Oct 18 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1802
  - rebuilt

  * Sun Oct 18 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1803
  - rebuilt

  * Sun Oct 18 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1804
  - rebuilt

  * Sun Oct 18 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1805
  - rebuilt

  * Sun Oct 18 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1806
  - rebuilt

  * Sun Oct 18 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1807
  - rebuilt

  * Sun Oct 18 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1808
  - rebuilt

  * Mon Oct 19 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1809
  - rebuilt

  * Mon Oct 19 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1810
  - rebuilt

[Bug 1888513] perl-Math-FFT-1.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888513

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED
 CC||ppi...@redhat.com
   Fixed In Version||perl-Math-FFT-1.36-1.fc34
   Assignee|extras-orphan@fedoraproject |ppi...@redhat.com
   |.org|
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar  ---
An enhancement release suitable for all Fedoras.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1889097] perl-Test-Run-0.0305 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889097

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||jples...@redhat.com
   Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Run-0.0305-1.fc34
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
   Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com   |jples...@redhat.com
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Last Closed||2020-10-19 12:36:44




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1889341] perl-Test-Run-CmdLine-0.0132 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889341



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
An unexpected error occurred while creating the scratch build and has been
automatically reported. Sorry!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1889341] New: perl-Test-Run-CmdLine-0.0132 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889341

Bug ID: 1889341
   Summary: perl-Test-Run-CmdLine-0.0132 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Test-Run-CmdLine
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 0.0132
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.0131-15.fc33
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Run-CmdLine/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/6333/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple license change : Public Domain -> BSD

[Xavier Bachelot]

Hi,

perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple was previously tagged as Public Domain, 
but upstream added a LICENSE file to 1.26 release, so I changed the 
License tag to BSD accordingly.


Regards,
Xavier
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1887101] perl-Crypt-Rijndael-1.15 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887101

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2020-10-19 12:09:02




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1887101] perl-Crypt-Rijndael-1.15 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887101

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jples...@redhat.com
   Fixed In Version||perl-Crypt-Rijndael-1.15-1.
   ||fc34
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #3 from Jitka Plesnikova  ---
Built by xavierb.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1888897] perl-Text-Format-0.62 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||jples...@redhat.com
   Fixed In Version||perl-Text-Format-0.62-1.fc3
   ||4
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Last Closed||2020-10-19 12:05:49



--- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova  ---
Built by xavierb


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1889027] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.42 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889027



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-4c709aaaf3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-4c709aaaf3


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1889027] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.42 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889027



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-f4aa4d4e97 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f4aa4d4e97


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1889198] perlbrew-0.89 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889198



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-d41c37dd89 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d41c37dd89


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1889027] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.42 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889027

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.42
   ||-1.fc34




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1889027] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.42 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889027

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC|iarn...@gmail.com   |
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org