Re: gnome boxes image folder should be marked nodatacow?
On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 10:42 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > > Before I submit a BZ I figured maybe some discussion was in order. > > As the default fs is now btrfs and it's well known to be bad for VMs, I'm > surprised this wasn't already implemented. > It is implemented. https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2020-July/msg01377.html Applies to virt-install, virt-manager, GNOME Boxes, and Cockpit. If you do a clean install and haven't setup a storage pool yet before copying over VM images from some other source, they won't be nodatacow because the enclosing directory isn't yet nodatacow. -- Chris Murphy ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Heads up] python-sqlobject upgrade from 3.3.0 to 3.9.1
Hello! Turned out that some basic functionality no longer wiorks even with python3.9 available in Fedora 33 (see rhbz #1896975). I am going to upgrade it up to 3.9.1 version where compatibility with Python3 is ensured. I will upgrade Rawhide, F-34 branches. Despite of a version gap should be a compatible upgrade but still. Looks like we don't have any affected packages in a repo. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[heads up] libgsasl upgrade from 1.8.1 to 1.10.0
Hello! I am going to upgrade libgsasl for Fedora 35. The last version available in Fedora 1.8.1 is more than 9 years old so it's time to move up. It should be backwards-compatible upgrade but still it's a 9 years gap so beware. Potentially affected packages: erlang-esasl-0:0.1-29.20120116git665cc80.fc32.x86_64 exim-0:4.94-3.fc33.x86_64 gsignond-plugin-sasl-0:0-0.10.2017.git671022f.fc33.x86_64 jabberd-0:2.6.1-15.fc33.x86_64 jreen-0:1.2.1-18.fc33.x86_64 libinfinity-0:0.7.1-10.fc33.x86_64 msmtp-0:1.8.10-2.fc33.x86_64 pokerth-0:1.1.2-13.fc33.x86_64 tin-0:2.4.5-3.fc33.x86_64 -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-34-20210403.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 6/189 (x86_64), 12/127 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210401.n.0): ID: 841407 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841407 ID: 841413 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841413 ID: 841419 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841419 ID: 841426 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841426 ID: 841429 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841429 ID: 841430 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841430 ID: 841431 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841431 ID: 841488 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841488 ID: 841493 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841493 ID: 841494 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841494 ID: 841497 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841497 ID: 841498 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841498 ID: 841501 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_system_logging@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841501 ID: 841511 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841511 ID: 841589 Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_disabled@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841589 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-34-20210401.n.0): ID: 841398 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841398 ID: 841510 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841510 ID: 841585 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841585 Soft failed openQA tests: 3/189 (x86_64), 6/127 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-34-20210401.n.0): ID: 841321 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841321 ID: 841362 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841362 ID: 841425 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841425 ID: 841438 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841438 ID: 841463 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841463 ID: 841478 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841478 ID: 841500 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841500 ID: 841559 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841559 ID: 841614 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841614 Passed openQA tests: 180/189 (x86_64), 109/127 (aarch64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-34-20210401.n.0): ID: 841408 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841408 ID: 841409 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841409 ID: 841410 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_terminal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841410 ID: 841411 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso base_reboot_unmount URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841411 ID: 841412 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso base_service_manipulation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841412 ID: 841414 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso base_system_logging URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841414 ID: 841415 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso base_selinux URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841415 ID: 841416 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_background URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841416 ID: 841417 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso
Fedora-Rawhide-20210403.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 9/189 (x86_64), 16/127 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210331.n.0): ID: 841036 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_updates URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841036 ID: 841050 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841050 ID: 841056 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841056 ID: 841144 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841144 ID: 841164 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841164 ID: 841165 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841165 ID: 841166 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841166 ID: 841168 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841168 ID: 841271 Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841271 ID: 841279 Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841279 ID: 841280 Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841280 ID: 841631 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_update_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841631 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210331.n.0): ID: 841015 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841015 ID: 841016 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841016 ID: 841033 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841033 ID: 841046 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841046 ID: 841081 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841081 ID: 841109 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841109 ID: 841112 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841112 ID: 841113 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841113 ID: 841114 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841114 ID: 841151 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841151 ID: 841193 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841193 ID: 841268 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841268 ID: 841298 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841298 Soft failed openQA tests: 69/189 (x86_64), 50/127 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210331.n.0): ID: 841047 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841047 ID: 841121 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841121 ID: 841126 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841126 ID: 841130 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841130 ID: 841146 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841146 ID: 841300 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841300 ID: 841311 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841311 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210331.n.0): ID: 840996 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/840996 ID: 840997 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/840997 ID: 841003 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841003 ID: 841004 Test: x86_64
gnome boxes image folder should be marked nodatacow?
Before I submit a BZ I figured maybe some discussion was in order. As the default fs is now btrfs and it's well known to be bad for VMs, I'm surprised this wasn't already implemented. Since the folder is created on the fly in the user's home directory this can't be easily fixed through packaging. In fact the only way I can think of is to create a bash script wrapper for the gnome-boxes executable and check for the directory, create it if needed and chattr +C the directory. Is there a better solution? Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-IoT-35-20210403.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 6/15 (aarch64), 2/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210331.0): ID: 841673 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841673 ID: 841677 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_rebase@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841677 ID: 841685 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841685 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210331.0): ID: 841668 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841668 ID: 841670 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841670 ID: 841674 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841674 ID: 841679 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841679 ID: 841683 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841683 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210331.0): ID: 841657 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841657 Passed openQA tests: 13/16 (x86_64), 9/15 (aarch64) Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: Used mem changed from 170 MiB to 192 MiB Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/838345#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841656#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload: Used mem changed from 169 MiB to 190 MiB Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/838347#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841658#downloads Installed system changes in test aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi: Used mem changed from 183 MiB to 205 MiB System load changed from 0.38 to 0.77 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/838361#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841672#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora 34 compose report: 20210403.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-34-20210401.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210403.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 7 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:4 Upgraded packages: 110 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 7.44 MiB Size of dropped packages:160.37 KiB Size of upgraded packages: 1.29 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 2.82 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Silverblue/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-34-20210403.n.0.iso Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree ppc64le Path: Silverblue/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-ppc64le-34-20210403.n.0.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Cloud_Base qcow2 s390x Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-34-20210401.n.0.s390x.qcow2 Image: Server dvd s390x Path: Server/s390x/iso/Fedora-Server-dvd-s390x-34-20210401.n.0.iso Image: Server boot s390x Path: Server/s390x/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-s390x-34-20210401.n.0.iso Image: Container_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Base-34-20210401.n.0.s390x.tar.xz Image: Cloud_Base raw-xz s390x Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-34-20210401.n.0.s390x.raw.xz Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-34-20210401.n.0.s390x.tar.xz Image: Everything boot s390x Path: Everything/s390x/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-s390x-34-20210401.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: containers-common-4:1-13.fc34 Summary: Common configuration and documentation for containers RPMs:containers-common Size:59.03 KiB Package: dmtcp-2.6.1~rc1-0.1.fc34 Summary: Checkpoint/Restart functionality for Linux processes RPMs:dmtcp dmtcp-devel Size:1.39 MiB Package: libtraceevent-1.1.1-1.fc34 Summary: Library to parse raw trace event formats RPMs:libtraceevent libtraceevent-devel Size:1.24 MiB Package: libtracefs-1.0.2-2.fc34 Summary: Library for access kernel tracefs RPMs:libtracefs libtracefs-devel Size:231.52 KiB Package: python-pyunicorn-0.6.1-1.fc34 Summary: Unified complex network and recurrence analysis toolbox RPMs:python3-pyunicorn Size:2.36 MiB Package: rpi-imager-1.6-1.fc34 Summary: Graphical user-interface to write disk images and format SD cards RPMs:rpi-imager Size:2.16 MiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: gnome-shell-extension-activities-configurator-89-3.fc34 Summary: Configure the top bar and Activities button in GNOME Shell RPMs:gnome-shell-extension-activities-configurator Size:51.93 KiB Package: gnome-shell-extension-do-not-disturb-button-39-4.fc34 Summary: Hide desktop notifications until you're ready to look at them RPMs:gnome-shell-extension-do-not-disturb-button Size:40.84 KiB Package: gnome-shell-extension-historymanager-prefix-search-12-7.fc34 Summary: Use PageUp and PageDown to search for previous GNOME Shell commands RPMs:gnome-shell-extension-historymanager-prefix-search Size:26.43 KiB Package: gnome-shell-extension-windowoverlay-icons-37-2.fc34 Summary: Show app icons on top of the windows thumbnails in Activities Overview RPMs:gnome-shell-extension-windowoverlay-icons Size:41.17 KiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: NetworkManager-openvpn-1:1.8.14-1.fc34 Old package: NetworkManager-openvpn-1:1.8.12-1.fc34.2 Summary: NetworkManager VPN plugin for OpenVPN RPMs: NetworkManager-openvpn NetworkManager-openvpn-gnome Size: 1.57 MiB Size change: -11.30 KiB Changelog: * Tue Mar 30 2021 Beniamino Galvani - 1:1.8.14-1 - Update to 1.8.14 release Package: R-qtl-1.48.1-1.fc34 Old package: R-qtl-1.47.9-1.fc34 Summary: Tools for analyzing QTL experiments RPMs: R-qtl Size: 26.22 MiB Size change: -3.50 KiB Changelog: * Sun Mar 28 2021 Mattias Ellert - 1.48.1-1 - Update to 1.48-1 Package: accel-config-3.1-1.fc34 Old package: accel-config-3.0.1-1.fc34 Summary: Configure accelerator subsystem devices RPMs: accel-config accel-config-devel accel-config-libs Size: 369.27 KiB Size change: 185.56 KiB Changelog: * Mon Mar 29 2021 Yunying Sun - 3.1-1 - Added ix86 support back as 3.1 release fixed it - Updated to 3.1 release Package: adwaita-qt-1.2.1-1.fc34 Old package: adwaita-qt-1.2.0-2.fc34 Summary: Adwaita theme for Qt-based applications RPMs: adwaita-qt5 libadwaita-qt5 libadwaita-qt5-devel Size: 1.46 MiB Size change: -1.27 KiB Changelog: * Mon Mar 22 2021 Jan Grulich - 1.2.1-1 - 1.2.1 Package: ansible-lint-1:5.0.6-1.fc34 Old package: ansible-lint-1:5.0.4-1.fc34 Summary: Best practices checker for Ansible RPMs: python3-ansible-lint Size: 171.93 KiB Size change: 862 B Changelog: * Thu Mar 25 2021 Parag Nemade - 1:5.0.6-1 - Update to 5.0.6 version (#1942976) Package: ardour6-6.6.0-1.fc34 Old package: ardour6-6.5.0-3
Re: Depict: package dependency visualizer
On 2021-04-01 at 15:54 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 9:13 AM Łukasz Posadowski > wrote: > > Thank You. It should be really helpful with VM migrations, by > > tracking 3rd party packages and leftover dependencies. I'm > > trying to > > run it on RHEL 8 and it is working on Python 3.8, but not on > > 3.6. I > > think I'll have to rebuild python-rpm for 3.8 first, then. > > I've just checked in a fix for a bug in the rpm input that might > have > affected RHEL 8. I have not actually tested on RHEL 8 at all, so > maybe not. In any case, if it still fails to work, would you mind > filing an issue on pagure and I'll look into it? > > I also just checked in a dnf input for depict, which may be more > to > your liking anyway. For the moment it has exactly the same set of > options as the rpm input, but that will change in the not too > distant > future as I start to leverage some of dnf's features. Thank, but nope. :) Python 3.6 is just too old for Your codebase. For example, You're using Final from typing module, which was introduced on 3.8. I will have to rebuild rpm bindings for Python 3.8, but python-rpm module is "buried" inside source package for rpm itself. I think I'll just use it with Fedora. Dependencies should be similar enough. -- Łukasz Posadowski ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-32-20210403.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210401.0): ID: 840824 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/840824 ID: 840831 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/840831 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Outreachy Applicant Introduction
Hello everyone, I am Shreya Gupta, a sophomore at IIT Patna, India. I am having a keen interest in Open Source. I am highly interested in your Outreachy project 'Improve Fedora QA dashboard'. I am primarily interested in Web development. I have the knowledge and prior experience of developing websites in Nodejs, React, and Javascript. I have gone through the project Readme file and project details where there is information about system requirements. I am using Ubuntu and all other system requirements are satisfied by my PC. will I be able to set up this project on ubuntu? Kindly reply. Thank you. ___ qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-33-20210403.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210401.0): ID: 840821 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/840821 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210401.0): ID: 840810 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/840810 ID: 840817 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/840817 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 5/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F35 Change proposal: Smaller Container Base Image (remove sssd-client, util-linux, shadow-utils) (Self-Contained Change)
Dnia Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 05:30:30PM -0400, Neal Gompa napisał(a):
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 5:18 PM Lars Seipel wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 02:36:48PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >Unless OpenShift and RKE recently changed so that containers can run
> > >as root by default (as of yesterday, they didn't), this is solidly a
> > >bad idea, since it makes it much more unintuitive to set up secure
> > >containers conforming with the guidelines for these Kubernetes
> > >platforms.
> >
> > In my experience, containers trying to run stuff from shadow-utils in
> > their entrypoint/startup scripts tend to be a reason for containers to
> > *not* run on OpenShift/OKD without additional adjustments.
> >
> > A related (and more common) issue are images that expect to run with a
> > particular named user (or UID) determined during the build process
> > (again, most likely created using shadow-utils).
> >
> > I'm not familiar with Rancher but at least for OpenShift, I don't think
> > the availability of shadow-utils is very useful. At run time, you can't
> > use the shadow-utils at all and whatever you do with it during build
> > time is unlikely to be helpful (and actively harmful more often than
> > not) at run time when OpenShift assigns you an arbitrary UID.
>
> It's basically required for building containers that will work at
> runtime where OpenShift assigns an arbitrary UID.
>
> For example, in my containers, I *build* and create a "runtime user"
> with the UID 1000, and then set things up to use that context at the
> end. OpenShift uses that for its dynamic UID assignment.
But you do not need shadow-utils for that. Even OpenShift
documentation shows simple echo is enough:
if ! whoami &> /dev/null; then
if [ -w /etc/passwd ]; then
echo "${USER_NAME:-default}:x:$(id -u):0:${USER_NAME:-default}
user:${HOME}:/sbin/nologin" >> /etc/passwd
fi
fi
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.10/creating_images/guidelines.html
(yeah, I know it's an old and obsolete version of docs)
--
Tomasz Torcz RIP is irrevelant. Spoofing is futile.
to...@pipebreaker.pl Your routes will be aggreggated. -- Alex Yuriev
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
