Re: RPM name collisions
przemek klosowski via devel writes: > Is that something we need to worry about? I couldn't think of any new > rules to impose on repositories, but maybe dnf should have more explicit > warnings when it sees multiple versions of the same package, or at least > a way to show such versions. Or how about teaching dnf that only certain repositories are allowed to be used for updates (with an allowedlist for exceptions)? Then microsoft or any other third party repo could put hello-5000-1 into their repo and it could never compromise your system, as dnf would not consider the 3rd party repo a valid update repo for a base system package. That would require dnf to track where it got the package from though and I am not sure if it does that at the moment? Cheers, Dan signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956892] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Carp-Always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956892 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-48f0da6718 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-48f0da6718 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956708] perl-CGI-4.52 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956708 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-98172c21c0 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-98172c21c0` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-98172c21c0 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953617] CVE-2021-22204 perl-Image-ExifTool: improper neutralization of user data in the DjVu file format allows arbitrary code execution when parsing a malicious image [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953617 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Image-ExifTool-12.16-3 |perl-Image-ExifTool-12.16-3 |.fc33 |.fc33 |perl-Image-ExifTool-12.16-3 |perl-Image-ExifTool-12.16-3 |.fc32 |.fc32 ||perl-Image-ExifTool-12.16-3 ||.fc34 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-de850ed71e has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953617] CVE-2021-22204 perl-Image-ExifTool: improper neutralization of user data in the DjVu file format allows arbitrary code execution when parsing a malicious image [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953617 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Image-ExifTool-12.16-3 |perl-Image-ExifTool-12.16-3 |.fc33 |.fc33 ||perl-Image-ExifTool-12.16-3 ||.fc32 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-e3d8833d36 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953616] CVE-2021-22204 perl-Image-ExifTool: improper neutralization of user data in the DjVu file format allows arbitrary code execution when parsing a malicious image
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953616 Bug 1953616 depends on bug 1953617, which changed state. Bug 1953617 Summary: CVE-2021-22204 perl-Image-ExifTool: improper neutralization of user data in the DjVu file format allows arbitrary code execution when parsing a malicious image [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953617 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1918698] Upgrade perl-Image-ExifTool to 12.15
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918698 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Image-ExifTool-12.16-1 |perl-Image-ExifTool-12.16-1 |.fc32 |.fc32 ||perl-Image-ExifTool-12.16-3 ||.fc33 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-88d24aa32b has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953617] CVE-2021-22204 perl-Image-ExifTool: improper neutralization of user data in the DjVu file format allows arbitrary code execution when parsing a malicious image [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953617 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Image-ExifTool-12.16-3 ||.fc33 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-05-05 00:53:30 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-88d24aa32b has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1917309] Please include missing argument files in package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917309 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Image-ExifTool-12.16-1 |perl-Image-ExifTool-12.16-1 |.fc32 |.fc32 ||perl-Image-ExifTool-12.16-3 ||.fc33 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-88d24aa32b has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210425.n.0 changes
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 11:00 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I wondered about that, but it didn't seem like the changes were that > major. They just dropped support for old pythons and dropped a bunch of > cruft they had to support them. ;( For NetworkX, this is the story: https://github.com/networkx/networkx/issues/4718 The good news is they are now saying that decorator 5.0.7 provides a backwards compatible interface, so it should be okay to patch out the < 5.0 requirement. > Sorry about that. No worries. Rawhide is where we discover and fix such issues. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
how to ignore fedora's rawhide repo in the kickstarts file?
Hi, Ny kickstart file has the following: %include /usr/share/spin-kickstarts/fedora-live-base.ks %include /usr/share/spin-kickstarts/fedora-live-minimization.ks But I have noticed that it wants to go into the rawhide repo. That is because /usr/share/spin-kickstarts/fedora-live-base.ks has fedora-repo-rawhide.ks as the repo by default. Now, I know that I can comment it out but I dont want to do this everytime. Is it possible to require the repo to be set at fedora-repo-not-rawhide.ks by default without modifying the system file? TIA. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1957021] New: perl-Mozilla-PublicSuffix-1.0.4 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1957021 Bug ID: 1957021 Summary: perl-Mozilla-PublicSuffix-1.0.4 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Mozilla-PublicSuffix Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: yan...@declera.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, yan...@declera.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.0.4 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.0.3-1.fc35 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mozilla-PublicSuffix/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7540/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956892] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Carp-Always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956892 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-48f0da6718 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-48f0da6718 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Planned Outage - mbs.fedoraproject.org - 2021-05-05 17:00 UTC
Planned Outage - mbs.fedoraproject.org - 2021-05-05 17:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2021-05-05 17:00 UTC which will last approximately 1 hour. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-05-05 17:00UTC' Reason for outage: Fedora's module build service will be upgraded to the latest upstream version. During the upgrade, modules will not be possible to build. Affected Services: mbs.fedoraproject.org Ticket Link: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9929 Please join #fedora-admin or #fedora-noc on irc.freenode.net or add comments to the ticket for this outage above. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Planned Outage - mbs.fedoraproject.org - 2021-05-05 17:00 UTC
Planned Outage - mbs.fedoraproject.org - 2021-05-05 17:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2021-05-05 17:00 UTC which will last approximately 1 hour. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-05-05 17:00UTC' Reason for outage: Fedora's module build service will be upgraded to the latest upstream version. During the upgrade, modules will not be possible to build. Affected Services: mbs.fedoraproject.org Ticket Link: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9929 Please join #fedora-admin or #fedora-noc on irc.freenode.net or add comments to the ticket for this outage above. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956892] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Carp-Always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956892 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33798 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Proposed Release Schedule for 12.0.1 and 13.0.0
On 5/4/21 9:35 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 07:58:16PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: Here is the proposed release schedule for the next 2 releases: I assume from the Cc line that this is clang/llvm, right? Yes, but I did not mean to send this email to the Fedora list. Sorry for the noise. July 27: release/13.x branch created July 30: 13.0.0-rc1 Aug 24: 13.0.0-rc2 Sep 7: 13.0.0-rc3 Sep 21: 13.0.0-final The Fedora Linux 35 mass rebuild is scheduled to start one week before the branch creation here (July 21). OK, thanks. We have not usually pushed new versions of clang before the mass rebuilds. If there is interest in changing this, maybe we can start a discussion in another thread. -Tom ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2021-05-04)
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2021-05-04) === Meeting started by mhroncok at 17:00:05 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2021-05-04/fesco.2021-05-04-17.00.log.html . Meeting summary --- * init process (mhroncok, 17:00:14) * #2597 F35 Change: Debuginfod By Default (mhroncok, 17:02:00) * there is now a warning with sleep on the first time you run this (mhroncok, 17:04:36) * the Council agreed that this is a technical matter for FESCo (mhroncok, 17:05:27) * LINK: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/council/council.2021-04-29-17.00.log.html#l-230 (bcotton, 17:05:53) * AGREED: The change is approved with the warning in https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2597#comment-730463 (+5,0,-0) (mhroncok, 17:10:04) * Next week's chair (mhroncok, 17:10:29) * ACTION: mhroncok will chair next meeting (mhroncok, 17:11:14) * Open Floor (mhroncok, 17:11:23) * LINK: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt (mhroncok, 17:14:05) * LINK: https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan (mhroncok, 17:14:41) * FESCo nominations are open until 2021-05-12 (mhroncok, 17:27:19) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development/SteeringCommittee/Nominations (mhroncok, 17:27:25) Meeting ended at 17:28:55 UTC. Action Items * mhroncok will chair next meeting Action Items, by person --- * mhroncok * mhroncok will chair next meeting * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --- * mhroncok (73) * dcantrell (20) * Eighth_Doctor (17) * zodbot (16) * decathorpe (11) * zbyszek (8) * nirik (6) * bcotton (6) * ignatenkobrain (0) * Conan_Kudo (0) * sgallagh (0) * cverna (0) * Sir_Gallantmon (0) * King_InuYasha (0) * Son_Goku (0) * Pharaoh_Atem (0) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1913148] perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit-0.13 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1913148 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit-0. |perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit-0. |12 is available |13 is available --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Latest upstream release: 0.13 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.11-18.fc34 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/TAP-Formatter-JUnit/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3359/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956816] Package perl-Mojolicious with broken dependencies from EPEL Repository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956816 --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar --- (In reply to Bahruz Mechtiyev from comment #2) > there is a Package in Perl Streams 5.30, but not in Perl Streams 5.26: > That's right. And that's correct. There is no package in perl:5.26 stream. The 5.26 packages live outside any perl stream. # dnf -q repoquery perl-Time-HiRes perl-Time-HiRes-0:1.9758-1.el8.x86_64 (from RHEL-8.0) perl-Time-HiRes-4:1.9758-2.el8.x86_64 (from RHEL-8.4) > ~]# dnf module list perl > Updating Subscription Management repositories. > Unable to read consumer identity > This system is receiving updates from Red Hat Satellite or Spacewalk server. > Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:50 ago on Tue 04 May 2021 04:50:26 PM > CEST. > Name Stream > Profiles Summary > perl 5.24 > common [d], minimal Practical Extraction > and Report Language > perl 5.26 [d] > common [d], minimal Practical Extraction > and Report Language > perl 5.30 [e] > common [d], minimal Practical Extraction > and Report Language > > dnf info perl-Time-HiRes > Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:33 ago on Tue 04 May 2021 04:50:26 PM > CEST. > Available Packages > Name : perl-Time-HiRes > Version : 1.9760 > Release : 439.module+el8.3.0+6718+7f269185 > Architecture : x86_64 > Size : 62 k > Source : > perl-Time-HiRes-1.9760-439.module+el8.3.0+6718+7f269185.src.rpm > Repository : rhel-8-appstream > Summary : High resolution alarm, sleep, gettimeofday, interval timers > License : GPL+ or Artistic > Description : The Time::HiRes module implements a Perl interface to the > usleep, nanosleep, > : ualarm, gettimeofday, and setitimer/getitimer system calls, > in other words, > : high resolution time and timers. > > I have switch to Perl Streams 5.30 That's a result of enabling perl:5.30 stream. The non-modular 5.26 perl-Time-HiRes disappears and a modular package built for perl:5.30 is visible instead. , but i cannot still install > perl-Mojolicious from this Stream, because it needs lib from Perl Stream > 5.26: Because EPEL packages, where perl-Mojolicous belongs to, are built only against the default perl stream. I.e. perl:5.26. I recommend you resetting perl module back the the default stream: # dnf module reset perl This will give you perl:5.26 and you should see the non-modular perl-Time-HiRes again. If it does not, then something is wrong with your repositories (or mirrors where you download them from). Finally, I also recommend running: # dnf --allowerasing distro-sync after changing module streams. This will synchronized the installed packaged to the ones available from the currently active module stream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: New RPM submission
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 10:09:09AM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote: > Could you comment on the status of repository > package-maintainer-docs at pagure.io [1]? It looks like it is > intended to be that migration, I wanted to contribute and started > with a tiny pull request (to be followed by more substantial ones), > but there has been no reaction from you or other admins. I am the nominal owner of that repo by happenstance. I'm happy to just give ownership of it to you, if you like, or a new one could be started. (We'd want to migrate it to antora rather than pelican, I think!) -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Proposed Release Schedule for 12.0.1 and 13.0.0
On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 07:58:16PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > Here is the proposed release schedule for the next 2 releases: I assume from the Cc line that this is clang/llvm, right? > July 27: release/13.x branch created > July 30: 13.0.0-rc1 > Aug 24: 13.0.0-rc2 > Sep 7: 13.0.0-rc3 > Sep 21: 13.0.0-final The Fedora Linux 35 mass rebuild is scheduled to start one week before the branch creation here (July 21). -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-05-05 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #meetingname EPEL #topic Intros #topic Old Business #topic EPEL-7 #topic EPEL-8 #topic EPEL-9 #topic Openfloor #endmeeting Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9854/ ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-05-05 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #meetingname EPEL #topic Intros #topic Old Business #topic EPEL-7 #topic EPEL-8 #topic EPEL-9 #topic Openfloor #endmeeting Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9854/ ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956892] New: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Carp-Always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956892 Bug ID: 1956892 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Carp-Always Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Carp-Always Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter: igor.ra...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: emman...@seyman.fr, lkund...@v3.sk, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, It would be great if you could build perl-Carp-Always for the EPEL8. Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Prioritized bugs and issues
On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 7:05 AM wrote: > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-05-05 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00 > America/Indiana/Indianapolis >At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net > There are no nominated bugs and 1 previously accepted bug to be discussed: * Cpu usage very high until touchpad is touched — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847627 -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956816] Package perl-Mojolicious with broken dependencies from EPEL Repository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956816 --- Comment #2 from Bahruz Mechtiyev --- Hi, there is a Package in Perl Streams 5.30, but not in Perl Streams 5.26: ~]# dnf module list perl Updating Subscription Management repositories. Unable to read consumer identity This system is receiving updates from Red Hat Satellite or Spacewalk server. Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:50 ago on Tue 04 May 2021 04:50:26 PM CEST. Name Stream Profiles Summary perl 5.24 common [d], minimal Practical Extraction and Report Language perl 5.26 [d] common [d], minimal Practical Extraction and Report Language perl 5.30 [e] common [d], minimal Practical Extraction and Report Language dnf info perl-Time-HiRes Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:33 ago on Tue 04 May 2021 04:50:26 PM CEST. Available Packages Name : perl-Time-HiRes Version : 1.9760 Release : 439.module+el8.3.0+6718+7f269185 Architecture : x86_64 Size : 62 k Source : perl-Time-HiRes-1.9760-439.module+el8.3.0+6718+7f269185.src.rpm Repository : rhel-8-appstream Summary : High resolution alarm, sleep, gettimeofday, interval timers License : GPL+ or Artistic Description : The Time::HiRes module implements a Perl interface to the usleep, nanosleep, : ualarm, gettimeofday, and setitimer/getitimer system calls, in other words, : high resolution time and timers. I have switch to Perl Streams 5.30, but i cannot still install perl-Mojolicious from this Stream, because it needs lib from Perl Stream 5.26: [root@devbib8 ~]# dnf install perl-Mojolicious Updating Subscription Management repositories. This system is receiving updates from Red Hat Satellite or Spacewalk server. Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:40 ago on Tue 04 May 2021 04:50:26 PM CEST. Error: Problem: package perl-Mojolicious-8.42-1.el8.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.26.3), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best candidate for the job - package perl-libs-4:5.26.3-416.el8.i686 is filtered out by modular filtering - package perl-libs-4:5.26.3-416.el8.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering - package perl-libs-4:5.26.3-417.el8_3.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering - package perl-libs-4:5.26.3-417.el8_3.i686 is filtered out by modular filtering (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) Can you check please dependencies for the package? I want to install the perl-Mojolicious Package from Perl Stream 5.26. Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Orphaning and retiring couple of packages
Hello! I've orphaned - python-flask-principal - python-flask-rstpages - transfered ownership of python-flask-login to jkaluza Retired - sidc - clearlooks-phenix Best regards, -- sorki ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Schedule for Tuesdays's FESCo Meeting (2021-05-04)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-05-04 17:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be discussed can be found at: https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket = Nonresponsive maintainer: Neil Horman / nhorman https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2587 APPROVED (+2, 0, -0) = Followups = #2597 F35 Change: Debuginfod By Default https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2597 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual issue. The report of the agenda items can be found at https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to this e-mail, file a new issue at https://pagure.io/fesco, e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956708] perl-CGI-4.52 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956708 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-98172c21c0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-98172c21c0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Storing package metadata in ELF objects
On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 19:57 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 18:44 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > [I'm forwarding the mail from Luca who is not subscribed to fedora- > > devel] > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 01:38:31PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > Cross-posting to the mailing lists of a few relevant projects. > > Note that in this version of the email the [N] references in your email > don't seem to point anywhere. I found an older variant of the same > email which contained: > > [0] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/18433 > [1] https://systemd.io/COREDUMP_PACKAGE_METADATA/ > [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Package_information_on_ELF_objects > [3] https://github.com/systemd/package-notes Sorry about that! Must have messed up the copy > > After an initial discussion [0], recently we have been working on a new > > specification [0] to encode rich package-level metadata inside ELF > > objects, so that it can be included automatically in generated coredump > > files. The prototype to parse this in systemd-coredump and store the > > information in systemd-journal is ready for testing and merged > > upstream. We are now seeking further comments/opinions/suggestions, as > > we have a few months before the next release and thus there's plenty of > > time to make incompatible changes to the format and implementation, if > > required. > > > > A proposal to use this by default for all packages built in Fedora 35 > > has been submitted [1]. > > > > The Fedora Wiki and the systemd.io document have more details, but to > > make a long story short, a new .notes.package section with a JSON > > payload will be included in ELF objects, encoding various package- > > build-time information like distro name, package > > name, > > etc. > > Is there a list of default keys (and their canonical spelling, upper- > lower-Camel_Case, etc.)? If there is, could we have a "debuginfod" key > with as value an URL pointing to the debuginfod server URL where the > embedded build-id executable, debuginfo and sources can be found? > https://sourceware.org/elfutils/Debuginfod.html The "Implementation" section of the spec lists the "main" fields: https://systemd.io/COREDUMP_PACKAGE_METADATA/ (source for that is https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/main/docs/COREDUMP_PACKAGE_METADATA.md ) Would you like to send a PR to update it and add that field? > > To summarize from the discussion, the main reasons why we believe this > > is useful are as following: > > > > 1) minimal containers: the rpm database is not installed in the > > containers. The information about build-ids needs to be stored > > externally, so package name information is not available immediately, > > but only after offline processing. The new note doesn't depend on the > > rpm db in any way. > > > > 2) handling of a core from a container, where the container and host > > have different distros > > > > 3) self-built and external packages: unless a lot of care is taken to > > keep access to the debuginfo packages, this information may be lost. > > The new note is available even if the repository metadata gets lost. > > Users can easily provide equivalent information in a format that makes > > sense in their own environment. It should work even when rpms and debs > > and other formats are mixed, e.g. during container image creation. > > > > Other than in Fedora, we are already making the required code changes > > at Microsoft to use the same format for internally-built > > binaries, and for tools that parse core files and logs. > > > > Tools for RPM and DEB (debhelper) integration are also available [3]. > > > > > -- > > > Kind regards, > > > Luca Boccassi -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956708] perl-CGI-4.52 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956708 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-CGI-4.52-1.fc35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956816] Package perl-Mojolicious with broken dependencies from EPEL Repository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956816 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||robinlee.s...@gmail.com, ||yan...@declera.com Component|perl-JSON-Any |perl-Mojolicious Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com |emman...@seyman.fr Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Strange, I could have sworn perl-Time-HiRes was provided by the RHEL/CentOS AppStream repository. Can you run the command "dnf repolist" and show us the result? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Rawhide-20210504.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 15/193 (x86_64), 9/123 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210503.n.2): ID: 877913 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_package_install_remove URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877913 ID: 877916 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_update_cli **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877916 ID: 877929 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877929 ID: 877940 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877940 ID: 877942 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877942 ID: 878020 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/878020 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210503.n.2): ID: 877859 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877859 ID: 877897 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877897 ID: 877919 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877919 ID: 877933 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877933 ID: 877936 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_terminal **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877936 ID: 877984 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877984 ID: 878015 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/878015 ID: 878018 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/878018 ID: 878044 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/878044 ID: 878082 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/878082 ID: 878084 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/878084 ID: 878111 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/878111 ID: 878112 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/878112 ID: 878120 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/878120 ID: 878139 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/878139 ID: 878147 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/878147 ID: 878156 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/878156 ID: 878161 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/878161 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/193 (x86_64), 2/123 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210503.n.2): ID: 877957 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877957 ID: 877964 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877964 ID: 878035 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/878035 Passed openQA tests: 177/193 (x86_64), 99/123 (aarch64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210503.n.2): ID: 877921 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877921 ID: 877981 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877981 ID: 877983 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877983 ID: 878012 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_resize_lvm@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/878012 Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 13 of 316 Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 1.19 to 0.60 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877169#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877906#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload: Used swap changed from 5 MiB to 4 MiB System load changed from 1.76 to 1.16 Previous
[Bug 1956708] perl-CGI-4.52 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956708 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|jples...@redhat.com,| |mmasl...@redhat.com,| |mspa...@redhat.com | Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956767] perl-Sys-Virt-7.3.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956767 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Sys-Virt-7.3.0-1.fc35 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2021-05-04 13:26:29 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956816] New: Package perl-Mojolicious with broken dependencies from EPEL Repository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956816 Bug ID: 1956816 Summary: Package perl-Mojolicious with broken dependencies from EPEL Repository Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: perl-JSON-Any Severity: urgent Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: mechti...@lrz.de QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: emman...@seyman.fr, iarn...@gmail.com, lkund...@v3.sk, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: I cannot install Package perl-Mojolicious. ]# dnf install --nobest perl-Mojolicious Updating Subscription Management repositories. Last metadata expiration check: 1:37:10 ago on Mon 03 May 2021 03:17:06 PM CEST. Error: Problem: conflicting requests - package perl-Mojolicious-8.26-1.el8.noarch requires perl(Time::HiRes), but none of the providers can be installed - package perl-Mojolicious-8.42-1.el8.noarch requires perl(Time::HiRes), but none of the providers can be installed - package perl-Time-HiRes-1.9760-439.module+el8.3.0+6718+7f269185.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) it is Perl Streams 5.26 as default installed: ]# dnf module list perl Updating Subscription Management repositories. Last metadata expiration check: 1:43:46 ago on Mon 03 May 2021 03:17:06 PM CEST. rhel-8-appstream Name StreamProfiles Summary perl 5.24 common [d], minimal Practical Extraction and Report Language perl 5.26 [d] common [d], minimal Practical Extraction and Report Language perl 5.30 common [d], minimal Practical Extraction and Report Language please adjust the dependencies for the package. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): RHEL 8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
orphaning some packages
Dear Fedorans, I'm orphaning a couple of packages due to lack of time to maintain them: ming - Packaged as an optional dependency of wxmacmolplt, has several open security vulnerabilities and FTBFS against PHP 8. Upstream unresponsive. vecmath - Packaged as part of unfinished effort to get SweetHome3D into Fedora. No issues except the Javapocalypse. ;) Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956767] perl-Sys-Virt-7.3.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956767 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|berra...@redhat.com,| |crobi...@redhat.com,| |jples...@redhat.com,| |st...@silug.org | Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Linux 5.13 To Allow Zstd Compressed Modules, Zstd Update Pending With Faster Performance
On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 12:46 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 08:51:15PM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote: > > LINUX KERNEL -- > > Adding to the variety of places where the Linux kernel supports making use > > of Zstd compression, kernel modules moving forward can now enjoy size > > reductions with Zstd. > > Is this email a proposed Fedora change? Might be best to follow the > process: I read it as a wish list > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/program_management/changes_policy/ > > This change, while probably welcome, isn't entirely confined to the > kernel package. Various other packages consume/create kernel modules > and so will be affected. (In my case, supermin will require small > changes to cope.) So it should be submitted as a system-wide change > IMHO. It needs quite a few changes and someone with the time and ability to do all the work. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210504.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210503.n.2 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210504.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 19 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.17 GiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 1.19 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 684.85 KiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Server raw-xz aarch64 Path: Server/aarch64/images/Fedora-Server-Rawhide-20210503.n.2.aarch64.raw.xz = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: community-mysql-8.0.24-1.module_f35+11955+f40a443a Summary: MySQL client programs and shared libraries RPMs:community-mysql community-mysql-common community-mysql-devel community-mysql-errmsg community-mysql-libs community-mysql-server community-mysql-test Size:1.17 GiB Package: rust-derive_builder_core0.9-0.9.0-1.fc35 Summary: Internal helper library for the derive_builder crate RPMs:rust-derive_builder_core0.9+default-devel rust-derive_builder_core0.9+log-devel rust-derive_builder_core0.9+logging-devel rust-derive_builder_core0.9-devel Size:49.29 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: ansible-2.9.21-1.fc35 Old package: ansible-2.9.20-1.fc35 Summary: SSH-based configuration management, deployment, and task execution system RPMs: ansible ansible-doc ansible-test Size: 25.73 MiB Size change: -5.69 KiB Changelog: * Mon May 03 2021 Kevin Fenzi - 2.9.21-1 - Update to 2.9.21. Fixes rhbz#1956584 Package: chatterino2-2.3.1-1.fc35 Old package: chatterino2-2.3.0-1.fc35 Summary: Chat client for twitch.tv RPMs: chatterino2 Size: 11.90 MiB Size change: 174.82 KiB Changelog: * Tue May 04 2021 Artem Polishchuk - 2.3.1-1 - build(update): 2.3.1 Package: dummy-test-package-gloster-0-3607.fc35 Old package: dummy-test-package-gloster-0-3604.fc35 Summary: Dummy Test Package called Gloster RPMs: dummy-test-package-gloster Size: 223.79 KiB Size change: 228 B Changelog: * Mon May 03 2021 packagerbot - 0-3605 - rebuilt * Tue May 04 2021 packagerbot - 0-3606 - rebuilt * Tue May 04 2021 packagerbot - 0-3607 - rebuilt Package: gparted-1.3.0-1.fc35 Old package: gparted-1.2.0-1.fc34 Summary: Gnome Partition Editor RPMs: gparted Size: 10.08 MiB Size change: 233.22 KiB Changelog: * Mon May 03 2021 Mukundan Ragavan - 1.3.0-1 - Update to 1.3.0 Package: kf5-kdav-1:5.82.0-1.fc35 Old package: kf5-kdav-1:5.81.0-1.fc35 Summary: A DAV protocol implementation with KJobs RPMs: kf5-kdav kf5-kdav-devel Size: 830.05 KiB Size change: 641 B Changelog: * Mon May 03 2021 Rex Dieter - 1:5.82.0-1 - 5.82.0 Package: kf5-kdeclarative-5.82.0-1.fc35 Old package: kf5-kdeclarative-5.81.0-1.fc35 Summary: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 addon for Qt declarative RPMs: kf5-kdeclarative kf5-kdeclarative-devel Size: 2.04 MiB Size change: 7.55 KiB Changelog: * Mon May 03 2021 Rex Dieter - 5.82.0-1 - 5.82.0 Package: kf5-kdesignerplugin-5.82.0-1.fc35 Old package: kf5-kdesignerplugin-5.81.0-1.fc35 Summary: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 integration module for Qt Designer RPMs: kf5-kdesignerplugin Size: 528.19 KiB Size change: 12.58 KiB Changelog: * Mon May 03 2021 Rex Dieter - 5.82.0-1 - 5.82.0 Package: kf5-kinit-5.82.0-1.fc35 Old package: kf5-kinit-5.81.0-1.fc35 Summary: KDE Frameworks 5 tier 3 solution for process launching RPMs: kf5-kinit kf5-kinit-devel Size: 1.13 MiB Size change: -133 B Changelog: * Mon May 03 2021 Rex Dieter - 5.82.0-1 - 5.82.0 Package: kf5-kio-5.82.0-1.fc35 Old package: kf5-kio-5.81.0-1.fc35 Summary: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 solution for filesystem abstraction RPMs: kf5-kio kf5-kio-core kf5-kio-core-libs kf5-kio-devel kf5-kio-doc kf5-kio-file-widgets kf5-kio-gui kf5-kio-ntlm kf5-kio-widgets kf5-kio-widgets-libs Size: 17.26 MiB Size change: 32.70 KiB Changelog: * Mon May 03 2021 Rex Dieter - 5.82.0-1 - 5.82.0 Package: kf5-knewstuff-5.82.0-1.fc35 Old package: kf5-knewstuff-5.81.0-1.fc35 Summary: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 module for downloading application assets RPMs: kf5-knewstuff kf5-knewstuff-devel Size: 5.38 MiB Size change: -4.00 KiB Changelog: * Mon May 03 2021 Rex Dieter - 5.82.0-1 - 5.82.0 Package: kf5-knotifyconfig-5.82.0-1.fc35 Old package: kf5-knotifyconfig-5.81.0-1.fc35 Summary: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 module for KNotify configuration RPMs: kf5-knotifyconfig kf5-knotifyconfig-devel Size: 756.09 KiB Size change: 49 B Changelog: * Mon May 03 2021 Rex Dieter - 5.82.0-1 - 5.82.0 Package: kf5-kparts-5.82.0-1.fc35 Old package: kf5-kparts-5.81.0-1.fc35 Summary
Re: Linux 5.13 To Allow Zstd Compressed Modules, Zstd Update Pending With Faster Performance
On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 08:51:15PM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote: > LINUX KERNEL -- > Adding to the variety of places where the Linux kernel supports making use of > Zstd compression, kernel modules moving forward can now enjoy size reductions > with Zstd. Is this email a proposed Fedora change? Might be best to follow the process: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/program_management/changes_policy/ This change, while probably welcome, isn't entirely confined to the kernel package. Various other packages consume/create kernel modules and so will be affected. (In my case, supermin will require small changes to cope.) So it should be submitted as a system-wide change IMHO. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956767] New: perl-Sys-Virt-7.3.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956767 Bug ID: 1956767 Summary: perl-Sys-Virt-7.3.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Sys-Virt Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: berra...@redhat.com, crobi...@redhat.com, jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, st...@silug.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 7.3.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 7.2.0-1.fc35 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Sys-Virt/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3355/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Remove old GPG keys?
Miroslav Suchý writes: Dne 03. 05. 21 v 17:06 Sam Varshavchik napsal(a): Yeah, so: 1) Someone has to remember to do this as part of every release 2) This doesn't do anything about add-on repositories' keys 3) I had pgp keys going all the way to F19, etc… My approach is slightly awkward *nod* would you mind add clean-rpm-gpg-pubkey to Fedora? Then I can simply call it. It's been a long, long time since I packaged something. Life happens, etc… We'll see, can't make any promises… pgp0CuKvhQlxa.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956575] perl-PDL-2.046 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956575 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-PDL-2.46.0-1.fc35 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Last Closed||2021-05-04 11:05:20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: plocate?
On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 03:07:47PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 8:21 PM Dominique Martinet > wrote: > > > > (added mlocate maintainer msekleta in Ccs; hopefully that's a still > > valid address) > > > > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 02:06:00PM +: > > > Debian is apparently switching to plocate as the the default > > > locate/mlocate provider [0], a bit faster and more disk-efficient. > > > Would it make sense to do the same in Fedora? > > > > > > I prepared a package [1, 2]. The code seems nice and clean enough. > > > I'd be happy to take it through review, but I'm not particular keen > > > on long-term maintenance… > > > > Having just tried I think it'd make sense, the difference is striking. > > Small db update is a bit slower but that's a background activity, and > > search really feels instant (tens of ms) compared to a handful of > > seconds. > > > > > > I think that'll require a bit more work though, and we can start by just > > having the package available it doesn't have to be the default right > > away (I remembered that there was a discussion but not where it had > > ended, so was surprised to find no package in main repos!) > > Unless there's a significant impediment to making it the default in > Fedora 35, I think we should just move forward. I agree. Plocate/mlocate is useful technology, but it's not important enough to justify maintaining two or three different implementations. If we can make plocate cover all bases, and it's faster, I'd just make it *the* implementation. Let's get the agreement of mlocate maintainer first though. Michal, wdyt? > updatedb does not index /home when /home is a bind mount (75 comments) > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906591 > > Summary: Upstream sets PRUNE_BIND_MOUNTS to "no". For some reason > Fedora has it set to "yes". Because both rpm-ostree and Btrfs make use > of bind mounts, updatedb doesn't index /home at all. Silverblue setups > comment the PRUNE_BIND_MOUNTS = "yes" line out, so the problem doesn't > happen on Silverblue. But it still is a problem on default desktops, > and I still don't know why we don't just do either what upstream or > Silverblue are doing. > > So I'm kinda curious if plocate will have issues related to bind > mounts or if it does things differently. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: fuse2 vs fuse3
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 4:27 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Is there any preference for fuse3 over fuse2? I moved a package over
> to fuse3 yesterday[1]. The API[2] seems a bit cleaner, but it's no
> big deal. However it's not really feasible to support both. Since I
> maintain several other fuse-using packages in Fedora, we have to pick
> one or the other.
>
> I notice also that almost no other packages have moved to fuse3:
>
> $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libfuse.so.2()(64bit)' --qf '%{name}'
> | sort -u | wc -l
> 62
>
> $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libfuse3.so.3()(64bit)' --qf '%{name}'
> | sort -u | wc -l
> 7
>
> Are we going to deprecate fuse2 at some point? Encourage upstreams to
> upgrade?
I think we should encourage upgrade/migration because I'm not sure
fuse2 is particularly actively being maintianed.
> One other minor point: BSDs can emulate fuse (which is essentially a
> Linux-only API), but their emulation seems to be of fuse2 only.
Probably not a huge concern from a Fedora PoV?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: fuse2 vs fuse3
Hi,
On 28/04/2021 16:27, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 11:27 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Is there any preference for fuse3 over fuse2? I moved a package over
to fuse3 yesterday[1]. The API[2] seems a bit cleaner, but it's no
big deal. However it's not really feasible to support both. Since I
maintain several other fuse-using packages in Fedora, we have to pick
one or the other.
I notice also that almost no other packages have moved to fuse3:
$ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libfuse.so.2()(64bit)' --qf '%{name}' |
sort -u | wc -l
62
$ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libfuse3.so.3()(64bit)' --qf '%{name}'
| sort -u | wc -l
7
Are we going to deprecate fuse2 at some point? Encourage upstreams to
upgrade?
One other minor point: BSDs can emulate fuse (which is essentially a
Linux-only API), but their emulation seems to be of fuse2 only.
Rich.
[1]
https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/commit/c74c7d7f01975e708b510e518895088fc61b5623
[2] https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/releases/tag/fuse-3.0.0
I think we eventually want everything moving to fuse3, but that's a
*slow* process...
Miklos, is that your eventual plan?
Steve.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956708] New: perl-CGI-4.52 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956708 Bug ID: 1956708 Summary: perl-CGI-4.52 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-CGI Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com, mspa...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 4.52 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.51-3.fc35 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CGI/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/2687/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-32-20210504.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210503.0): ID: 877801 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877801 ID: 877809 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877809 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210503.0): ID: 877802 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_package_install_remove URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877802 ID: 877810 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_package_install_remove@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877810 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-IoT-35-20210504.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210502.0): ID: 877816 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877816 ID: 877819 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877819 ID: 877826 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877826 ID: 877832 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877832 ID: 877835 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877835 Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 26 of 31 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956091] perl-Template-Tiny-1.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956091 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Template-Tiny-1.14-1.f ||c35 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2021-05-04 08:09:58 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Remove old GPG keys?
Dne 03. 05. 21 v 17:06 Sam Varshavchik napsal(a): Yeah, so: 1) Someone has to remember to do this as part of every release 2) This doesn't do anything about add-on repositories' keys 3) I had pgp keys going all the way to F19, etc… My approach is slightly awkward *nod* would you mind add clean-rpm-gpg-pubkey to Fedora? Then I can simply call it. Miroslav ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-Template-Tiny] PR #1: Tests
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Template-Tiny` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Template-Tiny/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-Template-Tiny] PR #1: Tests
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Template-Tiny` that you are following: `` Tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Template-Tiny/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-33-20210504.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210503.0): ID: 877461 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877461 ID: 877469 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877469 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210503.0): ID: 877462 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_package_install_remove URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877462 ID: 877470 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_package_install_remove@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877470 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: New RPM submission
Matthew Miller kirjoitti 3.5.2021 klo 17.36: On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 04:29:54PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: Right, but this sub- thread it about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers Ah, sorry. I got lost. :) But now that you mention it, I'd like to see that migrated to the new docs system too. Matthew, Could you comment on the status of repository package-maintainer-docs at pagure.io [1]? It looks like it is intended to be that migration, I wanted to contribute and started with a tiny pull request (to be followed by more substantial ones), but there has been no reaction from you or other admins. If the repository has been abandoned, it would be great to mark it as such. In that case we need a new repository. Maybe it would be better to start by moving all wiki pages that are still relevant to docs and publish, then incrementally improve from there. The package-maintainer-docs repository sets a discouraging precedent for the "let's move Package Maintainer docs to docs.fp.o AND rewrite them completely at the same time" approach. [1]: https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/package-maintainer-docs ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956091] perl-Template-Tiny-1.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956091 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|jples...@redhat.com,| |mmasl...@redhat.com | Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Rawhide-20210503.n.2 compose check report
Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 11/193 (x86_64), 12/132 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210502.n.0): ID: 877199 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_terminal **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877199 ID: 877244 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877244 ID: 877246 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877246 ID: 877275 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_resize_lvm@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877275 ID: 877281 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877281 ID: 877285 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_package_install_remove@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877285 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210502.n.0): ID: 877122 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877122 ID: 877160 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877160 ID: 877182 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877182 ID: 877184 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877184 ID: 877196 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877196 ID: 877247 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877247 ID: 877278 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877278 ID: 877354 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877354 ID: 877356 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877356 ID: 877383 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877383 ID: 877384 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877384 ID: 877392 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877392 ID: 877411 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877411 ID: 877419 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877419 ID: 877428 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877428 ID: 877433 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877433 ID: 877437 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877437 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/193 (x86_64), 3/132 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210502.n.0): ID: 877220 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877220 ID: 877227 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877227 ID: 877283 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877283 ID: 877307 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877307 Passed openQA tests: 181/193 (x86_64), 117/132 (aarch64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210502.n.0): ID: 877148 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_package_install_remove URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877148 ID: 877176 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_package_install_remove URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877176 ID: 877197 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_package_install_remove URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877197 ID: 877203 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877203 ID: 877221 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_package_install_remove URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877221 ID: 877235 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_package_install_remove@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877235 ID: 877260 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877260 ID: 877264 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso base_package_install_remove@uefi URL:
