Re: F35 Change: Remove SHA-1 from Sqlite (Self-Contained Change proposal)
Hello, According to the response from upstream [1], it seems I have come up with a solution too quickly. I apologize for this. I will go through a cancellation process of this Change Proposal, as there seems to be no valid reason to remove SHA-1 support in sqlite. Thanks for your help and understanding. Regards, Ondrej [1] https://sqlite.org/forum/forumpost/eec8e1bc739aee7d?raw On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 7:04 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 12:13:20AM +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote: > > > > Am 09.07.21 um 17:45 schrieb Ben Cotton: > > >== Detailed Description == > > >The use of SHA-1 is no longer permitted for Digital Signatures or > > >authentication in RHEL-9. Due to this reason, there is a need to > > >remove SHA-1 extension from sqlite in RHEL-9 and therefore also > > >Fedora. > > > > I don't think that this is a valid logical conclusion. Fedora is > > (should be?) upstream to RHEL 9 so you can disable SHA1 in RHEL 9 > > but keep it enabled in Fedora. There is certainly no "need" for this > > change as demonstrated by the various packaging changes done in > > RHEL. > > > > (FWIW I don't particularly care about SHA1 functionality in sqlite.) > > Also: if it is not the recommended choice, why not just select > something else as the default (which is already the case, iiuc), > and let users use sha-1 to access existing databases? > > Zbyszek > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Retiring python-cliapp and python-coverage-test-runner
Hi all, I'm retiring these two packages - python-cliapp - python-coverage-test-runner Upstream has been dead for three years; they were part of Lars Wirzenius' Obnam backup tool and were meant to be retired with the rest of the stack, and have no other dependent packages. Best regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim profile: https://keyoxide.org/mic...@michel-slm.name signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Packager sponsors site
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 12:54 AM Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > I am happy to announce that I deployed this little site > https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-sponsors/ Thank you for doing this. Anything that reduces the impedance for new people is overwhelming a good thing. It is easy for forget (especially for long timers) that getting started can have a large number of steps, many of which can seem overwhelming for those not steeped into the process. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Packager sponsors site
Jakub Kadlcik kirjoitti 12.7.2021 klo 3.36: Hello, I am happy to announce that I deployed this little site https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-sponsors/ Thank you for doing this. Finding a sponsor if one of the difficult steps in the onboarding process, making is easier is very valuable. Please share the site with new packagers if you get a chance. I suggest you update the relevant wiki page [1] (which is moving to docs.fp.o, just pending a pull request approval [2] — I will check any pages for recent edits and process them after docs.fp.o move goes live.) [1]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group [2]: https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/docs-fp-o/pull-request/171 If you would like to know more about the project, see https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-sponsors Feedback is always appreciated, so don't hesitate to file a new issue or reply here. I filed your first ticket, about how timezones are displayed. Otto ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Packager sponsors site
Hello, I am happy to announce that I deployed this little site https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-sponsors/ Its goal is to help new Fedora packagers find the right sponsor for them (based on the used programming language, domain of the project, native language of the packager, etc). Please share the site with new packagers if you get a chance. If you would like to know more about the project, see https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-sponsors Feedback is always appreciated, so don't hesitate to file a new issue or reply here. Also, if you are a sponsor, please set up your information. Please see this ticket - https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/477 Thank you, Jakub ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Improving Fedora sponsors discoverability
I am so sorry Kevin, I missed the message for some reason. > Looks pretty cool. Not sure it would be something for the first cut, or > later, but it might be nice to have a way to list 'preferred' contact > method? This might be something we could add to the account system also > and you could just get it from there? (ie, IRC, Matrix, email, other) I agree with you, this would be helpful for both sponsors and newcomer packagers. As you suggest, ideally, we should have this information in the accounts system (not defined within the sponsors site). Once the information is available there is no reason why not to display it :-) I created a ticket for it https://github.com/fedora-infra/noggin/issues/685 > There are packager groups... could perhaps look at them and get sponsors > from them? ie, python-sig, graphics-sig, etc? I originally thought so but then I decided to go with custom configuration files because I checked SIG memberships of some sponsors that I know and they never were in the SIG for the thing that I know they are interested in. Taking you for an example, in your config https://kevin.fedorapeople.org/sponsor.yaml you have the following interests - command-line, desktop, mobile, python, and epel but you are not a member of Desktop SIG, Mobility SIG, and Python SIG. But I guess we could take the SIG memberships and use them as one of the sources of configuration (in complement to what we already have). Does this sound reasonable to you? Jakub On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 7:43 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 05:03:36PM +0200, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > > Hello fellow Fedora people, > > > > Inspired by @msuchy's Flock 2016 presentation, I > > would like to tackle one of the topics discussed there - The > > discoverability of Fedora sponsors for newcomers. > > Thanks for taking this on! :) > > > I have a website ready to be deployed. If you are interested in the > > technical details, please see this RFE > > > > https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/470 > > > > and also the code > > > > https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-sponsors > > > > The page design is as simple as possible. You can see some screenshots > > here. > > > > https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/470#comment-735105 > > Looks pretty cool. Not sure it would be something for the first cut, or > later, but it might be nice to have a way to list 'preferred' contact > method? This might be something we could add to the account system also > and you could just get it from there? (ie, IRC, Matrix, email, other) > > > > A very important feature to me is grouping sponsors by their areas of > > interests / expertise, and I would like to ask for your help in this > > matter. > > > > At this moment, I have manually defined areas such as Python, C/C++, > > Haskell, Ruby, Functional programming, Web development, Modularity, > > etc and manually assigned people to them (the small number, that I > > personally know that do these kinds of things). > > > > Do you have any idea if there is a way to generate such areas and tie > > people to them based on some already existing information within the > > Fedora infrastructure? > > There are packager groups... could perhaps look at them and get sponsors > from them? ie, python-sig, graphics-sig, etc? > > kevin > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Macro to smoke-test-import a Python module in %check
On 11. 07. 21 21:05, Richard Shaw wrote: Trying this with python-pyside2... + /usr/bin/python3 -c 'import PySide2' PySide2/__init__.py: Unable to import shiboken2 from , /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-pyside2-5.15.2-4.fc35.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.10/site-packages, /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-pyside2-5.15.2-4.fc35.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages, /usr/lib64/python310.zip, /usr/lib64/python3.10, /usr/lib64/python3.10/lib-dynload, /usr/lib64/python3.10/site-packages, /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in File "/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-pyside2-5.15.2-4.fc35.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/PySide2/__init__.py", line 107, in _setupQtDirectories() File "/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-pyside2-5.15.2-4.fc35.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/PySide2/__init__.py", line 58, in _setupQtDirectories import shiboken2 File "/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-pyside2-5.15.2-4.fc35.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/shiboken2/__init__.py", line 27, in from .shiboken2 import * ImportError: libshiboken2.cpython-310-x86_64-linux-gnu.so.5.15: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Worked fine once installed. The 5.15 file is a symlink to 5.15.2 which is the actual library file name, but I don't see why it would follow symlinks once installed but not here? Is it possible that the symbolic link is absolute and hence not resolvable during the build (because it does not lead to the buildroot)? Not sure how the macro could compensate for that. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Test-Announce] 2021-07-12 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2021-07-12 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on ** irc.libera.chat ** Greetings testers! We didn't meet for a couple of weeks, so let's get together and check in. If anyone has any other items for the agenda, please reply to this email and suggest them! Thanks. == Proposed Agenda Topics == 1. Previous meeting follow-up 2. Fedora 35 status 3. Test Day / community event status 4. Open floor -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Macro to smoke-test-import a Python module in %check
Trying this with python-pyside2... + /usr/bin/python3 -c 'import PySide2' PySide2/__init__.py: Unable to import shiboken2 from , /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-pyside2-5.15.2-4.fc35.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.10/site-packages, /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-pyside2-5.15.2-4.fc35.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages, /usr/lib64/python310.zip, /usr/lib64/python3.10, /usr/lib64/python3.10/lib-dynload, /usr/lib64/python3.10/site-packages, /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in File "/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-pyside2-5.15.2-4.fc35.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/PySide2/__init__.py", line 107, in _setupQtDirectories() File "/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-pyside2-5.15.2-4.fc35.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/PySide2/__init__.py", line 58, in _setupQtDirectories import shiboken2 File "/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-pyside2-5.15.2-4.fc35.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/shiboken2/__init__.py", line 27, in from .shiboken2 import * ImportError: libshiboken2.cpython-310-x86_64-linux-gnu.so.5.15: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Worked fine once installed. The 5.15 file is a symlink to 5.15.2 which is the actual library file name, but I don't see why it would follow symlinks once installed but not here? Here's a scratch build I just kicked off if that helps: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=71716212 Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Current minimal base image for containers?
On 7/11/21 12:14, Martin Langhoff wrote: Hi Fedora Devel, is there any current equivalent of Fedora atomic, or the super-compact RHEL-7 minimal container images? IIRC those were _really_ small (ie: ~70MB) in size, had been installed with nodocs, etc. Couldn't find a CoreOS _minimal container_ image either. Current Fedora 34 minimal container image is 120MB. regards, martin Take a look at ubi8-micro. Not Fedora based but downstream of Fedora. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F35 Change: Remove SHA-1 from Sqlite (Self-Contained Change proposal)
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 12:13:20AM +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote: > > Am 09.07.21 um 17:45 schrieb Ben Cotton: > >== Detailed Description == > >The use of SHA-1 is no longer permitted for Digital Signatures or > >authentication in RHEL-9. Due to this reason, there is a need to > >remove SHA-1 extension from sqlite in RHEL-9 and therefore also > >Fedora. > > I don't think that this is a valid logical conclusion. Fedora is > (should be?) upstream to RHEL 9 so you can disable SHA1 in RHEL 9 > but keep it enabled in Fedora. There is certainly no "need" for this > change as demonstrated by the various packaging changes done in > RHEL. > > (FWIW I don't particularly care about SHA1 functionality in sqlite.) Also: if it is not the recommended choice, why not just select something else as the default (which is already the case, iiuc), and let users use sha-1 to access existing databases? Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Current minimal base image for containers?
Hi Fedora Devel, is there any current equivalent of Fedora atomic, or the super-compact RHEL-7 minimal container images? IIRC those were _really_ small (ie: ~70MB) in size, had been installed with nodocs, etc. Couldn't find a CoreOS _minimal container_ image either. Current Fedora 34 minimal container image is 120MB. regards, martin -- martin.langh...@gmail.com - ask interesting questions ~ http://linkedin.com/in/martinlanghoff - don't be distracted~ http://github.com/martin-langhoff by shiny stuff ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Rawhide-20210711.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 26 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 66/138 (aarch64), 107/199 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210710.n.0): ID: 924688 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924688 ID: 924689 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_update_cli@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924689 ID: 924863 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924863 ID: 924896 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924896 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210710.n.0): ID: 924562 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924562 ID: 924564 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924564 ID: 924565 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924565 ID: 924592 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924592 ID: 924593 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924593 ID: 924616 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924616 ID: 924617 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso memory_check@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924617 ID: 924620 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso anaconda_help URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924620 ID: 924621 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924621 ID: 924641 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso anaconda_help URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924641 ID: 924642 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924642 ID: 924662 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso anaconda_help URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924662 ID: 924674 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_reboot_unmount URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924674 ID: 924675 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924675 ID: 924676 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_selinux URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924676 ID: 924677 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_system_logging URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924677 ID: 924678 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_update_cli URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924678 ID: 924679 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_service_manipulation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924679 ID: 924680 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_package_install_remove URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924680 ID: 924681 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924681 ID: 924692 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924692 ID: 924694 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924694 ID: 924695 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924695 ID: 924696 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924696 ID: 924717 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924717 ID: 924748 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924748 ID: 924763 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_reboot_unmount@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924763 ID: 924764 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_package_install_remove@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924764 ID: 924765 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924765 ID: 924766 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_system_logging@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924766 ID: 924767 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_update_cli@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924767 ID: 924768 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924768 ID: 924769 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924769 ID: 924770 Tes
Fedora-IoT-35-20210711.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210710.0): ID: 925166 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/925166 ID: 925182 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/925182 ID: 925197 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/925197 ID: 925211 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/925211 ID: 925212 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/925212 Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 26 of 31 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-IoT-34-20210711.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210710.0): ID: 925134 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/925134 ID: 925144 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/925144 ID: 925146 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/925146 ID: 925149 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/925149 ID: 925160 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/925160 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210710.0): ID: 925130 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/925130 Passed openQA tests: 13/16 (x86_64), 12/15 (aarch64) Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.23 to 0.08 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/924530#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/925131#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210711.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210710.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210711.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 106 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 125.14 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 1.55 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: -2.79 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Minimal raw-xz aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/images/Fedora-Minimal-Rawhide-20210711.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz Image: Container_Base docker aarch64 Path: Container/aarch64/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20210711.n.0.aarch64.tar.xz = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Path: Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-Xfce-Rawhide-20210710.n.0.armhfp.raw.xz = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: python-ijson-3.1.4-1.fc35 Summary: Iterative JSON parser RPMs:python3-ijson Size:46.65 KiB Package: rust-assert-impl-0.1.3-1.fc35 Summary: Macro for static assert types implement a trait or not RPMs:rust-assert-impl+default-devel rust-assert-impl-devel Size:17.41 KiB Package: rust-cfg-expr-0.7.4-1.fc35 Summary: Parser and evaluator for Rust `cfg()` expressions RPMs:rust-cfg-expr+default-devel rust-cfg-expr+target-lexicon-devel rust-cfg-expr+targets-devel rust-cfg-expr-devel Size:61.08 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: abrt-2.14.6-6.fc35 Old package: abrt-2.14.6-5.fc35 Summary: Automatic bug detection and reporting tool RPMs: abrt abrt-addon-ccpp abrt-addon-kerneloops abrt-addon-pstoreoops abrt-addon-upload-watch abrt-addon-vmcore abrt-addon-xorg abrt-atomic abrt-cli abrt-console-notification abrt-dbus abrt-desktop abrt-devel abrt-gui abrt-gui-devel abrt-gui-libs abrt-libs abrt-plugin-bodhi abrt-plugin-machine-id abrt-retrace-client abrt-tui python3-abrt python3-abrt-addon python3-abrt-container-addon python3-abrt-doc Size: 6.66 MiB Size change: -267.91 KiB Changelog: * Sat Jul 10 2021 Bj??rn Esser - 2.14.6-6 - Rebuild for versioned symbols in json-c Package: accel-config-3.2-2.fc35 Old package: accel-config-3.2-1.fc35 Summary: Configure accelerator subsystem devices RPMs: accel-config accel-config-devel accel-config-libs Size: 287.27 KiB Size change: 918 B Changelog: * Sat Jul 10 2021 Bj??rn Esser - 3.2-2 - Rebuild for versioned symbols in json-c Package: ahven-2.8-1.fc35 Old package: ahven-2.7-10.fc35 Summary: A unit testing framework for Ada 95 RPMs: ahven ahven-devel Size: 1.96 MiB Size change: -17.09 KiB Changelog: * Fri Jul 09 2021 Bj??rn Persson - 2.8-1 - Upgraded to 2.8. Package: ansible-2.9.23-2.fc35 Old package: ansible-2.9.23-1.fc35 Summary: SSH-based configuration management, deployment, and task execution system RPMs: ansible ansible-doc ansible-test Size: 25.91 MiB Size change: 1.50 MiB Changelog: * Sat Jul 10 2021 Kevin Fenzi - 2.9.23-2 - Fix FTBFS with sphinx 4.x. Fixes rhbz#1977303 Package: ansible-collection-community-general-3.3.2-1.fc35 Old package: ansible-collection-community-general-3.2.0-1.fc35 Summary: Modules and plugins supported by Ansible community RPMs: ansible-collection-community-general Size: 1.40 MiB Size change: 12.64 KiB Changelog: * Sat Jul 10 2021 Kevin Fenzi - 3.3.2-1 - Update to 3.3.2. Fixes rhbz#1977438 Package: antlr-2.7.7-65.fc35 Old package: antlr-2.7.7-64.fc34 Summary: ANother Tool for Language Recognition RPMs: antlr-C++ antlr-javadoc antlr-manual antlr-tool Dropped RPMs: antlr-C++-doc Size: 1.98 MiB Size change: -7.06 MiB Changelog: * Mon Jun 28 2021 Mikolaj Izdebski - 2.7.7-65 - Remove Python runtime Package: apache-commons-net-3.6-12.fc35 Old package: apache-commons-net-3.6-11.fc34 Summary: Internet protocol suite Java library RPMs: apache-commons-net apache-commons-net-javadoc Size: 990.59 KiB Size change: 2.68 KiB Changelog: * Mon Jun 28 2021 Mikolaj Izdebski - 3.6-12 - Remove build-dependency on exec-maven-plugin Package: bcel-6.4.1-6.fc35 Old package: bcel-6.4.1-5.fc34 Summary: Byte Code Engineering Library RPMs: bcel bcel-javadoc Size: 1.50 MiB Size change: 6.24 KiB Changelog: * Mon Jun 28 2021 Mikolaj Izdebski - 6.4.1-6 - Remove dependency on jna Package: bear-3.0.13-2.fc35 Old package: bear-3.0.13-1.fc35 Summary: Tool that generates a compilation database for clang tooling RPMs: bear Size: 2.80 MiB Size change: 207.98 KiB Changelog: * Mon Jul 05 2021 Richard Shaw - 3.0.13-2 - Rebuild for new fmt version. Package: bind-32:9.16.18-4.fc35 Old package: bind-32:9.16.18-1.fc35 Summary: The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) DNS (Domain Name System) server RPMs: bind bind-chroot bind
