Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?
On 8/14/21 12:29 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 8/14/2021 10:19 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 09:34:11PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: Have there been any recent changes to the arm (32bit) builders? It seems like I'm having much more issues there with builds likely running out of memory or similar. Yes. They were mistakenly running the normal kernel (so they had ~3GB memory available). I moved them back to the lpae kernel (so they see 40GB memory), but this causes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920183 basically OOM kills kojid, which restarts kojid, which restarts the build, which kills kojid, etc... I've tried all kinds of things here, but haven't been able to find any way to make it work. Arm folks can't duplicate it on non koji builders. I suspect the number of people using lpae on 32bit arm is... low. We could just go back to non lpae, but that breaks building some other packages (llvm fails to build for example). It makes me wonder if we should consider letting 32bit arm go... (insert pitchforks and torches). Anyhow, if anyone has any ideas, let me know. Letting 32bit arm go would have my support. I suspect it's less and less interesting as a platform every day and it causes nothing but headaches. Jeff I would certainly be in favor of it. Many of the large C++ based packages I maintain take forever to build on it (and are now failing apparently due to various platform issues). Or perhaps at least a statement that support for it is "best effort" only to make it more acceptable to ExcludeArch it on some packages. -- Orion Poplawski he/him/his - surely the least important thing about me Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
23 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1b74f2e3ca
tor-0.4.5.9-1.el8
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-3c32bc85f8
putty-0.76-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
lua-sec-1.0.2-1.el8
odfpy-1.4.1-1.el8
Details about builds:
lua-sec-1.0.2-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-183042e2ba)
Lua binding for OpenSSL library
Update Information:
LuaSec 1.0.2 * Fix handle `SSL_send` SYSCALL error without
`errno` * Fix off by one in `cert:validat(notafter)` * Fix
`meth_get_{sinagure => signature}_name` function name * Fix update the Lua
state reference on the selected SSL context after SNI * Fix ignore
`SSL_OP_BIT(n)` macro and update `option.c`
ChangeLog:
* Sun Aug 15 2021 Robert Scheck 1.0.2-1
- Upgrade to 1.0.2 (#1993641)
* Thu Jul 22 2021 Fedora Release Engineering -
1.0.1-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild
References:
[ 1 ] Bug #1993641 - lua-sec-1.0.2 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993641
odfpy-1.4.1-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-247076f266)
Python library for manipulating OpenDocument files
Update Information:
New build for EPEL8
ChangeLog:
* Sat Aug 14 2021 Paul W. Frields - 1.4.1-1
- New upstream release 1.4.1
* Thu Jul 22 2021 Fedora Release Engineering -
1.4.0-8
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild
References:
[ 1 ] Bug #1950659 - EPEL8 Branch Request: odfpy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950659
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1989862] perl-enum-1.12 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989862 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version||perl-enum-1.12-1.fc34 Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2021-08-15 01:11:26 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-3cdbfdc66f has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
78 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1f259a45ef
openjpeg2-2.3.1-11.el7
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1405677543
putty-0.76-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
httpie-1.0.3-1.el7
lua-sec-1.0.2-1.el7
Details about builds:
httpie-1.0.3-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-0383a9978e)
A Curl-like tool for humans
Update Information:
Security fix for CVE-2019-10751
ChangeLog:
* Mon Aug 9 2021 Mikel Olasagasti - 1.0.3-1
- Update to latest possible version for EPEL7
- Remove Fedora bits
- Remove python2 bits
References:
[ 1 ] Bug #1751042 - CVE-2019-10751 httpie: url redirection vulnerability
allows attacker to write arbitrary file [epel-7]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751042
lua-sec-1.0.2-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-e34f0453dc)
Lua binding for OpenSSL library
Update Information:
LuaSec 1.0.2 * Fix handle `SSL_send` SYSCALL error without
`errno` * Fix off by one in `cert:validat(notafter)` * Fix
`meth_get_{sinagure => signature}_name` function name * Fix update the Lua
state reference on the selected SSL context after SNI * Fix ignore
`SSL_OP_BIT(n)` macro and update `option.c`
ChangeLog:
* Sun Aug 15 2021 Robert Scheck 1.0.2-1
- Upgrade to 1.0.2 (#1993641)
* Thu Jul 22 2021 Fedora Release Engineering -
1.0.1-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild
References:
[ 1 ] Bug #1993641 - lua-sec-1.0.2 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993641
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Running rawhide mockbuild on Fedora 33 fails with GPG check
Hi, I'm seeing the same problem, for a quick fix, we need update /etc/mock/templates/fedora-rawhide.tpl line 12 with config_opts['releasever'] = '36', as reference [1] ... We need a new mock-core-configs package with configurations for "Fedora 35 branched" some work in progress here [2] [2] https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/pull/763 [1] https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/commit/3480b06be2ab86133ade765619ffd3b21d7e7d60#diff-6d85f049d29a9ebeda1e02d48fb369982d6410ba63c64306001e1f41f8a3c4dd On Sun, 2021-08-15 at 02:02 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello. I've tried to run a rawhide mockbuild on Fedoa 33 and I get GPG > failures. It worked yesterday. > > I have the following packages installed: > > fedora-release-33-4 > fedora-repos-33-5 > mock-2.12-1.fc33 > mock-core-configs-34.6-1.fc33 > fedora-gpg-keys-33-5 > > > $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --scrub=all > ... > > $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --init > ... > Importing GPG key 0x9867C58F: > Userid : "Fedora (35) " > Fingerprint: 787E A6AE 1147 EEE5 6C40 B30C DB46 3971 9867 C58F > From : > /usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary > Key imported successfully > fedora > 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 > GPG key at > file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35- > primary > (0x9867C58F) is already installed > fedora > 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 > Importing GPG key 0x45719A39: > Userid : "Fedora (34) " > Fingerprint: 8C5B A699 0BDB 26E1 9F2A 1A80 1161 AE69 4571 > 9A39Importing GPG > key 0x9867C58F: > Userid : "Fedora (35) " > Fingerprint: 787E A6AE 1147 EEE5 6C40 B30C DB46 3971 9867 C58F > From : > /usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary > Key imported successfully > fedora > 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 > GPG key at > file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35- > primary > (0x9867C58F) is already installed > fedora > 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 > Importing GPG key 0x45719A39: > Userid : "Fedora (34) " > Fingerprint: 8C5B A699 0BDB 26E1 9F2A 1A80 1161 AE69 4571 9A39 > From : > /usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-primary > Key imported successfully > Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)? > Public key for alternatives-1.19-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm is not installed. > Failing > package is: alternatives-1.19-1.fc35.x86_64 > GPG Keys are configured as: > file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35- > primary, > file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35- > primary, > file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34- > primary > Public key for audit-libs-3.0.5-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm is not installed. > Failing > package is: audit-libs-3.0.5-1.fc36.x86_64 > GPG Keys are configured as: > file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35- > primary, > file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35- > primary, > file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34- > primary > Public key for basesystem-11-12.fc35.noarch.rpm is not installed. > Failing > package is: basesystem-11-12.fc35.noarch > GPG Keys are configured as: > file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35- > primary, > file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35- > primary, > file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34- > primary > Public key for bash-5.1.8-2.fc35.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing > package > is: bash-5.1.8-2.fc35.x86_64 > GPG Keys are configured as: > file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35- > primary, > file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35- > primary, > file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34- > primary > Public key for bzip2-libs-1.0.8-9.fc35.x86_64.rpm is not installed. > Failing > package is: bzip2-libs-1.0.8-9.fc35.x86_64 > GPG Keys are configured as: > file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35- > primary, > file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35- > primary, > file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34- > primary > ... > Public key for ca-certificates-2021.2.50-3.fc35.noarch.rpm is not > installed. > > Public key for zchunk-libs-1.1.15-2.fc35.x86_64.rpm is not installed. > Failing > package is: zchunk-libs-1.1.15-2.fc35.x86_64 > GPG Keys are configured as: > file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35- > primary, > file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35- > primary, > file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34- > primary > Public key for zlib-1.2.11-30.fc35.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing > package > is: zlib-1.2.11-30.fc35.x86_64 > GPG
Re: All COPR rawhide builds have failed
On 14. 08. 21 21:09, Paweł Marciniak wrote: All COPR rawhide builds have failed. It seems to be related to GPG keys. Importing GPG key 0x9867C58F: Userid : "Fedora (35) " Fingerprint: 787E A6AE 1147 EEE5 6C40 B30C DB46 3971 9867 C58F From : /usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary Key imported successfully fedora 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 GPG key at file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary (0x9867C58F) is already installed fedora 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 Importing GPG key 0x45719A39: Userid : "Fedora (34) " Fingerprint: 8C5B A699 0BDB 26E1 9F2A 1A80 1161 AE69 4571 9A39 From : /usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-primary Key imported successfully Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)? Public key for alternatives-1.19-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: alternatives-1.19-1.fc35.x86_64 I have the same problem with local mockbuild: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/ZPOZNHVHDZEEMDE6F3DGXY6SL5W6UXBO/ -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Running rawhide mockbuild on Fedora 33 fails with GPG check
Hello. I've tried to run a rawhide mockbuild on Fedoa 33 and I get GPG failures. It worked yesterday. I have the following packages installed: fedora-release-33-4 fedora-repos-33-5 mock-2.12-1.fc33 mock-core-configs-34.6-1.fc33 fedora-gpg-keys-33-5 $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --scrub=all ... $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --init ... Importing GPG key 0x9867C58F: Userid : "Fedora (35) " Fingerprint: 787E A6AE 1147 EEE5 6C40 B30C DB46 3971 9867 C58F From : /usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary Key imported successfully fedora 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 GPG key at file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary (0x9867C58F) is already installed fedora 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 Importing GPG key 0x45719A39: Userid : "Fedora (34) " Fingerprint: 8C5B A699 0BDB 26E1 9F2A 1A80 1161 AE69 4571 9A39Importing GPG key 0x9867C58F: Userid : "Fedora (35) " Fingerprint: 787E A6AE 1147 EEE5 6C40 B30C DB46 3971 9867 C58F From : /usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary Key imported successfully fedora 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 GPG key at file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary (0x9867C58F) is already installed fedora 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 Importing GPG key 0x45719A39: Userid : "Fedora (34) " Fingerprint: 8C5B A699 0BDB 26E1 9F2A 1A80 1161 AE69 4571 9A39 From : /usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-primary Key imported successfully Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)? Public key for alternatives-1.19-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: alternatives-1.19-1.fc35.x86_64 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-primary Public key for audit-libs-3.0.5-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: audit-libs-3.0.5-1.fc36.x86_64 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-primary Public key for basesystem-11-12.fc35.noarch.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: basesystem-11-12.fc35.noarch GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-primary Public key for bash-5.1.8-2.fc35.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: bash-5.1.8-2.fc35.x86_64 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-primary Public key for bzip2-libs-1.0.8-9.fc35.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: bzip2-libs-1.0.8-9.fc35.x86_64 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-primary ... Public key for ca-certificates-2021.2.50-3.fc35.noarch.rpm is not installed. Public key for zchunk-libs-1.1.15-2.fc35.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: zchunk-libs-1.1.15-2.fc35.x86_64 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-primary Public key for zlib-1.2.11-30.fc35.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: zlib-1.2.11-30.fc35.x86_64 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-primary Error: GPG check FAILED -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: requesting help to update spyder
On 14. 08. 21 18:06, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: Hi, I am trying to update spyder on rawhide and F35. The main issue I have is that pyqt requirements are strict. From the setup file, 'pyqt5<5.13', 'pyqtwebengine<5.13', Fedora has 5.15.x. If I relax QT versions, built and launch spyder, I get this error and spyder fails to launch. scaled(self, int, int, aspectRatioMode: Qt.AspectRatioMode = Qt.IgnoreAspectRatio, transformMode: Qt.TransformationMode = Qt.FastTransformation): argument 1 has unexpected type 'float' scaled(self, QSize, aspectRatioMode: Qt.AspectRatioMode = Qt.IgnoreAspectRatio, transformMode: Qt.TransformationMode = Qt.FastTransformation): argument 1 has unexpected type 'float' Do you know where is this error triggered? Try explicitly converting the floats to integers. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: After branching F36, under Rawhide I can not build packages for F35 for i386 arch, instead of it mock builded packages for F36.
On 8/14/21 7:48 PM, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote: After branching F36, under Rawhide I can not build packages for F35 for i386 arch, instead of it mock builded packages for F36. Mock rebuild output: https://pastebin.com/LmQxFBUN From your log it seems the mock config file "fedora-35-i386.cfg" is still symlinked to /etc/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386.cfg. I've checked mine and it is the same, it looks like it was not branched yet in mock-core-configs. Sergio opened a bug report yesterday regarding this: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/issues/762 I've sent a PR: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/pull/763 Either you wait until all of this is merged and built or you do the modifications manually if this is urgent. Best regards, Robert-André ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: All COPR rawhide builds have failed
I ran into the same thing, but I assumed it was me doing something wrong since I'm just starting out learning the Fedora Build process, The failures I am seeing are exactly the same as yours: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/q5sys/Fedora-Jam/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02521113-fedora-jam-backgrounds/builder-live.log.gz GPG key at file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary (0x9867C58F) is already installed fedora 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 GPG key at file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary (0x9867C58F) is already installed fedora 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 GPG key at file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-primary (0x45719A39) is already installed The GPG keys listed for the "fedora" repository are already installed but they are not correct for this package. Public key for basesystem-11-12.fc35.noarch.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: basesystem-11-12.fc35.noarch GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-primary 1. Public key for basesystem-11-12.fc35.noarch.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: basesystem-11-12.fc35.noarch GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-primary 2. 1. Public key for basesystem-11-12.fc35.noarch.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: basesystem-11-12.fc35.noarch GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-primary 2. On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 3:09 PM Paweł Marciniak wrote: > All COPR rawhide builds have failed. It seems to be related to GPG keys. > > Importing GPG key 0x9867C58F: > Userid : "Fedora (35) " > Fingerprint: 787E A6AE 1147 EEE5 6C40 B30C DB46 3971 9867 C58F > From : > /usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary > Key imported successfully > fedora 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB > 00:00 > GPG key at > file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary > (0x9867C58F) is already installed > fedora 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB > 00:00 > Importing GPG key 0x45719A39: > Userid : "Fedora (34) " > Fingerprint: 8C5B A699 0BDB 26E1 9F2A 1A80 1161 AE69 4571 9A39 > From : > /usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-primary > Key imported successfully > Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)? > Public key for alternatives-1.19-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm is not installed. > Failing package is: alternatives-1.19-1.fc35.x86_64 > > Build log: > > https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/sunwire/python-icmplib/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02521102-python-icmplib/builder-live.log.gz > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
All COPR rawhide builds have failed
All COPR rawhide builds have failed. It seems to be related to GPG keys. Importing GPG key 0x9867C58F: Userid : "Fedora (35) " Fingerprint: 787E A6AE 1147 EEE5 6C40 B30C DB46 3971 9867 C58F From : /usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary Key imported successfully fedora 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 GPG key at file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary (0x9867C58F) is already installed fedora 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 Importing GPG key 0x45719A39: Userid : "Fedora (34) " Fingerprint: 8C5B A699 0BDB 26E1 9F2A 1A80 1161 AE69 4571 9A39 From : /usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-primary Key imported successfully Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)? Public key for alternatives-1.19-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: alternatives-1.19-1.fc35.x86_64 Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/sunwire/python-icmplib/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02521102-python-icmplib/builder-live.log.gz ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: requesting help to update spyder
On 8/14/21 6:06 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: Hi, I am trying to update spyder on rawhide and F35. The main issue I have is that pyqt requirements are strict. From the setup file, 'pyqt5<5.13', 'pyqtwebengine<5.13', Fedora has 5.15.x. If I relax QT versions, built and launch spyder, I get this error and spyder fails to launch. scaled(self, int, int, aspectRatioMode: Qt.AspectRatioMode = Qt.IgnoreAspectRatio, transformMode: Qt.TransformationMode = Qt.FastTransformation): argument 1 has unexpected type 'float' scaled(self, QSize, aspectRatioMode: Qt.AspectRatioMode = Qt.IgnoreAspectRatio, transformMode: Qt.TransformationMode = Qt.FastTransformation): argument 1 has unexpected type 'float' Spec and patches can be seen here - https://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/nonamedotc/spyder5dev/spyder.git/tree/ Any help to get this sorted out will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Mukundan. It doesn't seem to be possible until upstream dedicate the time to migrate to 5.15: https://github.com/spyder-ide/spyder/issues/12829 ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?
On 8/14/2021 10:19 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 09:34:11PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: Have there been any recent changes to the arm (32bit) builders? It seems like I'm having much more issues there with builds likely running out of memory or similar. Yes. They were mistakenly running the normal kernel (so they had ~3GB memory available). I moved them back to the lpae kernel (so they see 40GB memory), but this causes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920183 basically OOM kills kojid, which restarts kojid, which restarts the build, which kills kojid, etc... I've tried all kinds of things here, but haven't been able to find any way to make it work. Arm folks can't duplicate it on non koji builders. I suspect the number of people using lpae on 32bit arm is... low. We could just go back to non lpae, but that breaks building some other packages (llvm fails to build for example). It makes me wonder if we should consider letting 32bit arm go... (insert pitchforks and torches). Anyhow, if anyone has any ideas, let me know. Letting 32bit arm go would have my support. I suspect it's less and less interesting as a platform every day and it causes nothing but headaches. Jeff ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1584474] Need version update for perl-Razor-Agent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584474 --- Comment #4 from Philip Prindeville --- Please update to 2.86. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1584474] Need version update for perl-Razor-Agent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584474 Philip Prindeville changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Version|29 |33 Resolution|EOL |--- Keywords||Reopened -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
After branching F36, under Rawhide I can not build packages for F35 for i386 arch, instead of it mock builded packages for F36.
After branching F36, under Rawhide I can not build packages for F35 for i386 arch, instead of it mock builded packages for F36. Mock rebuild output: https://pastebin.com/LmQxFBUN ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[389-devel] please review: PR 4873 - Move EntryUUID Plugin to subpackage
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4873 -- Directory Server Development Team ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Rawhide-20210814.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 4 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud Failed openQA tests: 32/206 (x86_64), 28/140 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210813.n.0): ID: 948023 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948023 ID: 948026 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_package_install_remove URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948026 ID: 948056 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_update_cli **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948056 ID: 948057 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948057 ID: 948063 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948063 ID: 948098 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948098 ID: 948152 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948152 ID: 948157 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_printing@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948157 ID: 948161 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gedit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948161 ID: 948163 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_update_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948163 ID: 948190 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_minimal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948190 ID: 948230 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948230 ID: 948231 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948231 ID: 948238 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948238 ID: 948242 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948242 ID: 948249 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948249 ID: 948263 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948263 ID: 948264 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948264 ID: 948290 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948290 ID: 948291 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948291 ID: 948298 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948298 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210813.n.0): ID: 947965 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/947965 ID: 947978 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/947978 ID: 947982 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/947982 ID: 947983 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/947983 ID: 947986 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/947986 ID: 947996 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/947996 ID: 948002 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_updates URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948002 ID: 948005 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948005 ID: 948007 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948007 ID: 948030 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948030 ID: 948031 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948031 ID: 948046 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948046 ID: 948050 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948050 ID: 948067 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948067 ID: 948108 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948108 ID: 948110 Test:
Fedora-35-20210814.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 23/204 (x86_64), 22/140 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210813.n.0): ID: 948316 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948316 ID: 948370 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948370 ID: 948427 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948427 ID: 948438 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso support_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948438 ID: 948462 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfsiso_variation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948462 ID: 948506 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gedit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948506 ID: 948508 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_update_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948508 ID: 948559 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_with_swap URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948559 ID: 948624 Test: aarch64 universal install_anaconda_text@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948624 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-35-20210813.n.0): ID: 948312 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948312 ID: 948325 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948325 ID: 948330 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948330 ID: 948333 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948333 ID: 948343 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948343 ID: 948352 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948352 ID: 948354 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948354 ID: 948381 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_background URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948381 ID: 948390 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_background URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948390 ID: 948393 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948393 ID: 948413 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_background URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948413 ID: 948453 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948453 ID: 948455 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948455 ID: 948461 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948461 ID: 948469 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948469 ID: 948471 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948471 ID: 948476 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948476 ID: 948480 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948480 ID: 948483 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948483 ID: 948504 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_background@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948504 ID: 948538 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948538 ID: 948545 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948545 ID: 948556 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948556 ID: 948557 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948557 ID: 948561 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948561 ID: 948565 Test: x86_64 universal memtest URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948565 ID: 948583 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948583 ID: 948589 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948589 ID: 948594 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/948594 ID: 948608 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL:
Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?
Kevin Fenzi writes: > It makes me wonder if we should consider letting 32bit arm go... > (insert pitchforks and torches). ... or go back to an F32 kernel? - FChE ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 09:34:11PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Have there been any recent changes to the arm (32bit) builders? It seems > like I'm having much more issues there with builds likely running out of > memory or similar. Yes. They were mistakenly running the normal kernel (so they had ~3GB memory available). I moved them back to the lpae kernel (so they see 40GB memory), but this causes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920183 basically OOM kills kojid, which restarts kojid, which restarts the build, which kills kojid, etc... I've tried all kinds of things here, but haven't been able to find any way to make it work. Arm folks can't duplicate it on non koji builders. I suspect the number of people using lpae on 32bit arm is... low. We could just go back to non lpae, but that breaks building some other packages (llvm fails to build for example). It makes me wonder if we should consider letting 32bit arm go... (insert pitchforks and torches). Anyhow, if anyone has any ideas, let me know. kevin ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
requesting help to update spyder
Hi, I am trying to update spyder on rawhide and F35. The main issue I have is that pyqt requirements are strict. From the setup file, 'pyqt5<5.13', 'pyqtwebengine<5.13', Fedora has 5.15.x. If I relax QT versions, built and launch spyder, I get this error and spyder fails to launch. scaled(self, int, int, aspectRatioMode: Qt.AspectRatioMode = Qt.IgnoreAspectRatio, transformMode: Qt.TransformationMode = Qt.FastTransformation): argument 1 has unexpected type 'float' scaled(self, QSize, aspectRatioMode: Qt.AspectRatioMode = Qt.IgnoreAspectRatio, transformMode: Qt.TransformationMode = Qt.FastTransformation): argument 1 has unexpected type 'float' Spec and patches can be seen here - https://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/nonamedotc/spyder5dev/spyder.git/tree/ Any help to get this sorted out will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Mukundan. -- GPG Key: E5C8BC67 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Intention to obtain ownership of retired packages
On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 10:32 AM JT wrote: > > All, > > The following packages have been orphaned and retired: > fedora-jam-backgrounds: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-jam-backgrounds/blob/rawhide/f/dead.package > fedora-jam-kde-theme: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-jam-kde-theme/blob/rawhide/f/dead.package > > I took over the Maintainership of the Fedora Jam Lab in April, but taking > over these packages seems to have fallen through the cracks. As the Lab > requires them to exist, I'm stepping forward to take up ownership of them. > > I will read through the process to un-retire a package and follow the steps > needed. If anyone has any concerns, issues, or advice, I'm all ears. > I'd be happy to help you get these back, just let me know the BZs for the package reviews and I'll take them. :) -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora 35 compose report: 20210814.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-35-20210813.n.0 NEW: Fedora-35-20210814.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 146 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.82 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 1.09 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 1.77 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Server raw-xz aarch64 Path: Server/aarch64/images/Fedora-Server-35-20210814.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz Image: Server raw-xz armhfp Path: Server/armhfp/images/Fedora-Server-35-20210814.n.0.armhfp.raw.xz Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker ppc64le Path: Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-35-20210814.n.0.ppc64le.tar.xz = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Security live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-35-20210813.n.0.iso Image: Cloud_Base tar-gz x86_64 Path: Cloud/x86_64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-GCP-35-20210813.n.0.x86_64.tar.gz Image: KDE raw-xz armhfp Path: Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-KDE-35-20210813.n.0.armhfp.raw.xz Image: Games live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Games-Live-x86_64-35-20210813.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: golang-github-dennwc-varint-1.0.0-2.fc35 Summary: Fast varint library for Go RPMs:golang-github-dennwc-varint-devel Size:12.98 KiB Package: gp2c-0.0.12-1.fc35 Summary: PARI/GP script to C program translator RPMs:gp2c gp2c-doc Size:1.07 MiB Package: iotools-1.7~pre0-1.fc35 Summary: Set of command line tools to access hardware device registers RPMs:iotools Size:160.05 KiB Package: pari-nflistdata-20210527-1.fc35 Summary: PARI/GP Computer Algebra System nflist extensions RPMs:pari-nflistdata Size:601.63 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: apt-2.3.7-1.fc35 Old package: apt-2.3.6-2.fc35 Summary: Command-line package manager for Debian packages RPMs: apt apt-apidoc apt-devel apt-doc apt-libs apt-utils Size: 16.67 MiB Size change: 12.04 KiB Changelog: * Thu Jul 29 2021 Fedora Release Monitoring - 2.3.7-1 - Update to 2.3.7 (#1987763) Package: awscli-1.20.21-1.fc35 Old package: awscli-1.20.17-1.fc35 Summary: Universal Command Line Environment for AWS RPMs: awscli Size: 2.09 MiB Size change: -805 B Changelog: * Tue Aug 10 2021 Gwyn Ciesla - 1.20.18-1 - 1.20.18 * Wed Aug 11 2021 Gwyn Ciesla - 1.20.19-1 - 1.20.19 * Thu Aug 12 2021 Gwyn Ciesla - 1.20.20-1 - 1.20.20 * Fri Aug 13 2021 Gwyn Ciesla - 1.20.21-1 - 1.20.21 Package: breeze-icon-theme-5.85.0-1.fc35 Old package: breeze-icon-theme-5.83.0-2.fc35 Summary: Breeze icon theme RPMs: breeze-icon-theme breeze-icon-theme-rcc Size: 8.75 MiB Size change: 102.47 KiB Changelog: * Thu Aug 12 2021 Rex Dieter - 5.85.0-1 - 5.85.0 Package: certbot-1.18.0-1.fc35 Old package: certbot-1.14.0-3.fc35 Summary: A free, automated certificate authority client RPMs: certbot python3-certbot Size: 416.42 KiB Size change: 13.64 KiB Changelog: * Wed Aug 04 2021 Felix Schwarz - 1.18.0-1 - Update to 1.18.0 (#1966771) Package: debconf-1.5.77-1.fc35 Old package: debconf-1.5.76-4.fc35 Summary: Debian configuration management system RPMs: debconf debconf-LDAP debconf-doc debconf-gnome debconf-i18n debconf-utils python3-debconf Size: 767.36 KiB Size change: 753 B Changelog: * Fri Aug 13 2021 S??rgio Basto - 1.5.77-1 - Update debconf to 1.5.77 (#1970631) Package: edid-decode-0-37.20210813git4fdf6f2d.fc35 Old package: edid-decode-0-8.20210629git9ca84336.fc35 Summary: Decode EDID data in human-readable format RPMs: edid-decode Size: 636.70 KiB Size change: -1.07 KiB Package: evolution-3.41.2-1.fc35 Old package: evolution-3.41.1-2.fc35 Summary: Mail and calendar client for GNOME RPMs: evolution evolution-bogofilter evolution-devel evolution-devel-docs evolution-help evolution-langpacks evolution-pst evolution-spamassassin Size: 28.39 MiB Size change: 88.84 KiB Changelog: * Fri Aug 13 2021 Milan Crha - 3.41.2-1 - Update to 3.41.2 Package: evolution-data-server-3.41.2-1.fc35 Old package: evolution-data-server-3.41.1-2.fc35 Summary: Backend data server for Evolution RPMs: evolution-data-server evolution-data-server-devel evolution-data-server-doc evolution-data-server-langpacks evolution-data-server-perl evolution-data-server-tests Size: 22.53 MiB Size change: 42.47 KiB Changelog: * Fri Aug 13 2021 Milan Crha - 3.41.2-1 - Update to 3.41.2 Package: evolution-ews-3.41.2-1.fc35 Old package: evolution-ews-3.41.1-2.fc35 Summary: Evolution extension for Exchange Web Services RPMs: evolution-ews evolution-ews-langpacks Size: 3.05 MiB Size change: 251 B Changelog: * Fri Aug 13
Intention to obtain ownership of retired packages
All, The following packages have been orphaned and retired: fedora-jam-backgrounds: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-jam-backgrounds/blob/rawhide/f/dead.package fedora-jam-kde-theme: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-jam-kde-theme/blob/rawhide/f/dead.package I took over the Maintainership of the Fedora Jam Lab in April, but taking over these packages seems to have fallen through the cracks. As the Lab requires them to exist, I'm stepping forward to take up ownership of them. I will read through the process to un-retire a package and follow the steps needed. If anyone has any concerns, issues, or advice, I'm all ears. Respectfully, JT Pennington ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210814.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210813.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210814.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 149 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 2.04 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 2.60 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 1.14 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: KDE raw-xz armhfp Path: Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-KDE-Rawhide-20210814.n.0.armhfp.raw.xz Image: Server raw-xz aarch64 Path: Server/aarch64/images/Fedora-Server-Rawhide-20210814.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz Image: Server raw-xz armhfp Path: Server/armhfp/images/Fedora-Server-Rawhide-20210814.n.0.armhfp.raw.xz = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Astronomy_KDE live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Astronomy_KDE-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210813.n.0.iso Image: Comp_Neuro live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Comp_Neuro-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210813.n.0.iso Image: Xfce live x86_64 Path: Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Xfce-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210813.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: golang-github-dennwc-varint-1.0.0-2.fc36 Summary: Fast varint library for Go RPMs:golang-github-dennwc-varint-devel Size:12.98 KiB Package: gp2c-0.0.12-1.fc36 Summary: PARI/GP script to C program translator RPMs:gp2c gp2c-doc Size:1.28 MiB Package: iotools-1.7~pre0-2.fc36 Summary: Set of command line tools to access hardware device registers RPMs:iotools Size:160.55 KiB Package: pari-nflistdata-20210527-1.fc36 Summary: PARI/GP Computer Algebra System nflist extensions RPMs:pari-nflistdata Size:601.67 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: COPASI-4.34.251-1.fc36 Old package: COPASI-4.33.246-3.fc35 Summary: Biochemical network simulator RPMs: COPASI COPASI-data COPASI-doc COPASI-gui python3-COPASI Size: 66.72 MiB Size change: 98.17 KiB Changelog: * Fri Aug 13 2021 Antonio Trande - 4.34.251-1 - Release 4.34 build-251 Package: applet-window-buttons-0.9.0-3.fc36 Old package: applet-window-buttons-0.9.0-3.fc35 Summary: Plasma 5 applet to show window buttons in panels RPMs: applet-window-buttons Size: 688.02 KiB Size change: -59 B Package: apt-2.3.7-1.fc36 Old package: apt-2.3.6-2.fc35 Summary: Command-line package manager for Debian packages RPMs: apt apt-apidoc apt-devel apt-doc apt-libs apt-utils Size: 16.67 MiB Size change: 13.82 KiB Changelog: * Thu Jul 29 2021 Fedora Release Monitoring - 2.3.7-1 - Update to 2.3.7 (#1987763) Package: awscli-1.20.21-1.fc36 Old package: awscli-1.20.20-1.fc36 Summary: Universal Command Line Environment for AWS RPMs: awscli Size: 2.09 MiB Size change: -1.04 KiB Changelog: * Fri Aug 13 2021 Gwyn Ciesla - 1.20.21-1 - 1.20.21 Package: certbot-1.18.0-1.fc36 Old package: certbot-1.14.0-3.fc35 Summary: A free, automated certificate authority client RPMs: certbot python3-certbot Size: 416.34 KiB Size change: 13.57 KiB Changelog: * Wed Aug 04 2021 Felix Schwarz - 1.18.0-1 - Update to 1.18.0 (#1966771) Package: cli11-2.0.0-1.fc36 Old package: cli11-1.9.1-5.fc35 Summary: Command line parser for C++11 RPMs: cli11-devel cli11-docs Size: 5.00 MiB Size change: 35.52 KiB Changelog: * Thu Jul 29 2021 Ryan Curtin - 2.0.0-1 - Upgrade to latest stable version. Package: cowsay-3.7.0-1.fc36 Old package: cowsay-3.04-17.fc35 Summary: Configurable speaking/thinking cow RPMs: cowsay Size: 45.42 KiB Size change: 2.88 KiB Changelog: * Fri Aug 13 2021 Gwyn Ciesla - 3.7.0-1 - 3.7.0i, new upstream. Package: debconf-1.5.77-1.fc36 Old package: debconf-1.5.76-4.fc35 Summary: Debian configuration management system RPMs: debconf debconf-LDAP debconf-doc debconf-gnome debconf-i18n debconf-utils python3-debconf Size: 767.14 KiB Size change: 526 B Changelog: * Fri Aug 13 2021 S??rgio Basto - 1.5.77-1 - Update debconf to 1.5.77 (#1970631) Package: drat2er-0-0.8.20190307.521caf1.fc36 Old package: drat2er-0-0.7.20190307.521caf1.fc35 Summary: Proof transformer for propositional logic RPMs: drat2er drat2er-devel drat2er-tools Size: 1.03 MiB Size change: 19.65 KiB Changelog: * Thu Aug 12 2021 Ryan Curtin - 0-0.8.20190307.521caf1 - Updated for newer CLI11-2.0.0 dependency. Package: dummy-test-package-gloster-0-5031.fc36 Old package: dummy-test-package-gloster-0-5014.fc36 Summary: Dummy Test Package called Gloster RPMs: dummy-test-package-gloster Size: 308.67 KiB Size change: 1.06 KiB Changelog: * Fri Aug 13 2021 packagerbot - 0-5015 - rebuilt * Fri Aug 13 2021 packagerbot - 0-5016 - rebuilt * Fri Aug 13 2021 packagerbot - 0-5017 - rebuilt * Fri Aug 13
Re: pypy3 renamed to pypy3.7 on Fedora 35+, also available in Fedora 33/34
On 14. 08. 21 8:53, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: Is there a reason it's not 7.3.5, which was out in May? The reason is simple, release monitoring was broken (used bitbucket URL), so we were unaware. This has been fixed and a bugzilla for 7.3.5 is open (component pypy): We will eventually get to it, but you can speed it up by submitting a PR. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: The Death of Java (packages)
* Vitaly Zaitsev via devel: > Building Java apps in your home directory with Internet access is a > trivial task. The official Fedora builds has no network access, so you > need to unbundle all dependencies into a separate packages first. This > is the main problem. In the build-on-demand Java case, there is no expectation that everything (including dependencies) is built from source. There is long-term backwards compatibility with existing bytecode, so sources are not technically required. The Go and Rust models are superficially similar, but the compiler does not provide anything comparable to bytecode stability, so everything *has* to be compiled from source using the installed compiler. Fedora's policy is to build from source. The problem is not so much that there is no network access on the builders, but that there are no immediately usable sources to build many Java packages. If it were just network access, it would be relatively straightforward to mirror everything into RPMs (like Go and Rust do), or perhaps use some other technology. But there is no general technical solution to the lack of viable source code. Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-34-20210814.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210812.0): ID: 947937 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/947937 ID: 947948 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/947948 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: The Death of Java (packages)
Jack Frost wrote: > >I tried to "take" an orphaned package ... can't not a packager, so I > >tried to do a review, and even though I appear to be part of the group, > >I couldn't even access the review build because apparently I don't have > >the rights. [I think this is a misunderstanding. There are no private builds in Fedora infra. Anyone (even without logging in) should be able to access any build. What was the build that you couldn't access?] > >My point is yes, it is requiring effort and it should but not to the > >extent of stonewalling contributions, and largely because the > >guidelines are confusing, it is a bit like reading a hand drawn map > >while driving IMO. Yeah, I think the sponsorship process, with unclear and unequal rules is one of the most antiquated parts of Fedora. > >So, back to orphaned packages, if a person from the community is signed > >up, signed the CA, the CoC, is a member of the appropriate groups, that > >person should be able to volunteer to take on orphaned packages, at > >least on a trila basis till they need no handholding. The deesire to > >contribute should be the bar to contribute is my point. On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 01:57:15PM -0400, Ben Beasley wrote: > In my opinion, rescuing orphaned packages tends to be one of the > harder packaging tasks. Many packages are orphaned for lack of time, > so they often have lingering obsolete practices that ought to be > brought into compliance with current guidelines. Many others are > orphaned because they have problems the previous packager found too > difficult, time-consuming, or frustrating to fix. Working on > orphaned packages can be a good way to learn quickly and a great way > to contribute, but I think new packagers are likely to need more > mentoring for these packages, not less. I think there's some idea to rescue here. I agree that adopting orphaned packages can be harder than it seems, but OTOH, it's a task that has big benefits for the community. In the past, the recommended way to become a packager, and the way that had the easiest process, was to add a new package. This made a lot of sense when the distro was smaller and there were always new things that could be reasonably added. Nowadays, we either have most upstream projects packaged, or they are very big and complex to package, or have many dependencies, or legal issues, or there just isn't that much need to have them packaged. And all other things being equal, I it's better to have one package maintained continuously, than a package maintained for some time and then dropped, and another package maintained. While we may have a constant of 1 package maintained, the second case disappoints users. tl;dr: I think we should change the guidelines [1] to explicitly recommend opening a pull request for an orphaned package as one of the ways. Maybe even describe it first. And describe the steps that need to be done in detail, so that it's easy to unexperienced folks to follow. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Convincing_someone_to_sponsor_you Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Eclipse IDE packages and friends orphaned
On 8/11/21 1:35 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: *snip* > *List of packages orphaned (all were maintained for the sake of Eclipse > stack):* > * eclipse > * cbi-plugins > * eclipse-ecf > * eclipse-egit > * eclipse-emf > * eclipse-gef > * eclipse-jgit > * eclipse-license > * eclipse-m2e-core > * eclipse-m2e-workspace > * eclipse-mpc > * eclipse-subclipse > * eclipse-webtools > * felix-gogo-command > * felix-gogo-parent > * felix-gogo-runtime > * felix-gogo-shell > * felix-scr > * icu4j > * jsch > * lucene > * rhino > * takari-polyglot > * tycho Hi, I took jsch, it seems to affect couple of important packages. Also noticed kawa being orphaned, I took that too. BR, Markku > -- > Aleksandar Kurtakov > Red Hat Eclipse Team > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-33-20210814.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210813.0): ID: 947772 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/947772 ID: 947783 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/947783 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: pypy3 renamed to pypy3.7 on Fedora 35+, also available in Fedora 33/34
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 at 08:50, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello PyPyistas, > > we have renamed the pypy3 package to pypy3.7 (both the component and the > "binary" package) on Fedora 35+. The package no longer installs to > /usr/lib64/pypy3-7.x/ but rather to /usr/lib64/pypy3.7/. > > *What is this good for?* > > When PyPy 3 was updated from Python 3.N to 3.N+1, traditionally we have only > updated it in Rawhide (and Branched), not to do a backward-incompatible update > in stable Fedoras. > With this renaming, you can now¹ install pypy3.7 on all Fedoras, despite pypy3 > being 3.6 on Fedora 33 and 34. > > ¹ (The builds are still running, expect an update in Bodhi later today.) > > Once PyPy 3.8 is released, we can introduce it to all Fedora versions. > > > *Warning to Rawhide/Fedora 35 users* > > If you already used the pypy3 package with PyPy 3.7, the pypy3.7 package will > obsolete it. However, the installation paths are different, so you will need > to > re-create your PyPy 3 virtual environments. > > > *Details* (feel free to ignore the rest of this email) > > During a lifetime of one stable Fedora release, you will get: > > - pypy3.N that provides pypy3 and has /usr/bin/pypy3 > - pypy3.N+c introduced later in the lifetime > > E.g. for Fedora 35: > > - pypy3.7 that provides pypy3 and has /usr/bin/pypy3 > - pypy3.8 (or newer) might be introduced in the future > > For Fedora 33 and 34, there is a transition period: > > - pypy3 provides pypy3.6 and has /usr/bin/pypy3 > - pypy3.7 was just introduced > - pypy3.8 (or newer) might be introduced in the future > > See for example on Fedora 33: > > $ rpm -qa | grep pypy3 > pypy3-libs-7.3.1-6.fc33.x86_64 > pypy3-7.3.1-6.fc33.x86_64 > pypy3-devel-7.3.1-6.fc33.x86_64 > pypy3.7-libs-7.3.4-4.fc33.x86_64 > pypy3.7-7.3.4-4.fc33.x86_64 > pypy3.7-devel-7.3.4-4.fc33.x86_64 > > $ pypy3.6 --version > Python 3.6.9 (831ff17f8cd1, May 26 2021, 11:41:48) > [PyPy 7.3.1 with GCC 10.3.1 20210422 (Red Hat 10.3.1-1)] > > $ pypy3.7 --version > Python 3.7.10 (8dd9fc18a6f0, Aug 11 2021, 06:30:36) > [PyPy 7.3.4 with GCC 10.3.1 20210422 (Red Hat 10.3.1-1)] > Is there a reason it's not 7.3.5, which was out in May? > $ pypy3 --version > Python 3.6.9 (831ff17f8cd1, May 26 2021, 11:41:48) > [PyPy 7.3.1 with GCC 10.3.1 20210422 (Red Hat 10.3.1-1)] > > Note that we *do not* plan to maintain old PyPy versions indefinitely, we plan > to retire them from Rawhide/Branched as soon as new versions arrive and only > keep them alive until stable Fedoras goes EOL. > > -- > Miro Hrončok -- Elliott ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
