Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
Miroslav Suchý kirjoitti 7.9.2021 klo 19.14: sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync Error: Problem 1: package arduino-core-1:1.8.13-5.fc34.noarch requires mvn(org.ow2.asm:asm-all), but none of the providers can be installed - objectweb-asm-8.0.1-2.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package arduino-core-1:1.8.13-5.fc34.noarch Already reported: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001333 Problem 3: problem with installed package gnuradio-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64 - package gnuradio-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.0.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gnuradio-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository This is already discussed in this thread, but was not in Bugzilla, so I reported it there: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002142 Problem 4: problem with installed package gqrx-2.14.4-1.fc34.x86_64 - package gqrx-2.14.4-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libboost_thread.so.1.75.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gqrx-2.14.4-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - boost-thread-1.75.0-4.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Reported twice already: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991876 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002104 Problem 5: package postgresql-server-devel-13.4-1.fc35.x86_64 requires postgresql-private-devel, but none of the providers can be installed - package postgresql-private-devel-13.4-1.fc35.i686 conflicts with libpq-devel provided by libpq-devel-13.4-1.fc35.x86_64 - package postgresql-private-devel-13.4-1.fc35.x86_64 conflicts with libpq-devel provided by libpq-devel-13.4-1.fc35.x86_64 - problem with installed package postgresql-server-devel-13.4-1.fc34.x86_64 - problem with installed package libpq-devel-13.4-1.fc34.x86_64 - postgresql-server-devel-13.4-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - libpq-devel-13.4-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package postgresql-private-devel-13.4-1.module_f35+12619+a275bc38.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering This is apparently a case where the user just has to pick one or the other: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/postgresql/blob/f35/f/postgresql.spec#_215 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Rawhide-20210907.n.1 compose check report
Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud Failed openQA tests: 37/207 (x86_64), 27/141 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210905.n.0): ID: 971140 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971140 ID: 971165 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971165 ID: 971178 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971178 ID: 971182 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971182 ID: 971183 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfsiso_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971183 ID: 971185 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971185 ID: 971193 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971193 ID: 971215 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971215 ID: 971228 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso anaconda_help URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971228 ID: 971260 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_system_logging@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971260 ID: 971261 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971261 ID: 971262 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_package_install_remove@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971262 ID: 971283 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971283 ID: 971286 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971286 ID: 971287 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso support_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971287 ID: 971291 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971291 ID: 971292 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971292 ID: 971313 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso mediakit_fileconflicts@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971313 ID: 971318 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971318 ID: 971319 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfsiso_variation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971319 ID: 971331 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971331 ID: 971350 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971350 ID: 971354 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_update_cli@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971354 ID: 971356 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971356 ID: 971362 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971362 ID: 971363 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971363 ID: 971370 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971370 ID: 971376 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971376 ID: 971386 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971386 ID: 971392 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971392 ID: 971393 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971393 ID: 971394 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971394 ID: 971395 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971395 ID: 971406 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971406 ID: 971416 Test: x86_64 universal support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971416 ID: 971423 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/971423 ID: 971427 Test: x86_64 universal install_pxeboot URL:
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210907.n.1 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210905.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210907.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 25 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 173 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 68.04 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 8.76 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 1.70 MiB Size change of upgraded packages: 327.40 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 404 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Comp_Neuro live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Comp_Neuro-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210907.n.1.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: deepin-pw-check-5.0.22-1.fc36 Summary: Tool used to check password and manager the configuration for password RPMs:deepin-pw-check deepin-pw-check-devel Size:10.25 MiB Package: deepin-wayland-1.0.0-1.fc36 Summary: Deepin Wayland libraries RPMs:deepin-wayland deepin-wayland-devel Size:310.71 KiB Package: dtkcommon-5.5.17-1.fc36 Summary: DTK common files RPMs:dtkcommon dtkcommon-devel Size:206.63 KiB Package: fasttrack-5.3.3-3.fc36 Summary: Track multiple objects in video recording RPMs:fasttrack fasttrack-cli fasttrack-doc Size:51.25 MiB Package: perl-App-cpanminus-1.7044-12.module_f36+12915+62cde8c9 Summary: Get, unpack, build and install CPAN modules RPMs:perl-App-cpanminus Size:86.59 KiB Package: perl-CGI-4.53-2.module_f36+12896+d2bed66b Summary: Handle Common Gateway Interface requests and responses RPMs:perl-CGI Size:198.12 KiB Package: perl-CPAN-Meta-Check-0.014-15.module_f36+12915+62cde8c9 Summary: Verify requirements in a CPAN::Meta object RPMs:perl-CPAN-Meta-Check Size:20.11 KiB Package: perl-DBD-MySQL-4.050-10.module_f36+12869+74b10a94 Summary: A MySQL interface for Perl RPMs:perl-DBD-MySQL Size:720.89 KiB Package: perl-DBD-Pg-3.14.2-3.module_f36+12880+84c4c75b Summary: A PostgreSQL interface for Perl RPMs:perl-DBD-Pg Size:1.07 MiB Package: perl-DBD-SQLite-1.66-3.module_f36+12884+c5f9f96e Summary: SQLite DBI Driver RPMs:perl-DBD-SQLite Size:955.18 KiB Package: perl-FCGI-1:0.79-6.module_f36+12904+8555a806 Summary: FastCGI Perl bindings RPMs:perl-FCGI Size:234.38 KiB Package: perl-File-pushd-1.016-10.module_f36+12915+62cde8c9 Summary: Change directory temporarily for a limited scope RPMs:perl-File-pushd Size:23.49 KiB Package: perl-IO-stringy-2.113-7.module_f36+12911+ce5db850 Summary: I/O on in-core objects like strings and arrays for Perl RPMs:perl-IO-stringy Size:65.06 KiB Package: perl-Module-CPANfile-1.1004-10.module_f36+12915+62cde8c9 Summary: Parse cpanfile RPMs:perl-Module-CPANfile Size:40.08 KiB Package: perl-Parse-PMFile-0.43-2.module_f36+12915+62cde8c9 Summary: Parses .pm file as PAUSE does RPMs:perl-Parse-PMFile Size:22.58 KiB Package: perl-String-ShellQuote-1.04-32.module_f36+12915+62cde8c9 Summary: Perl module for quoting strings for passing through the shell RPMs:perl-String-ShellQuote Size:18.79 KiB Package: perl-XML-Parser-2.46-7.module_f36+12919+2f2caac6 Summary: Perl module for parsing XML documents RPMs:perl-XML-Parser Size:1.10 MiB Package: perl-YAML-1.30-6.module_f36+12892+054a376f Summary: YAML Ain't Markup Language (tm) RPMs:perl-YAML Size:81.94 KiB Package: python-annexremote-1.5.0-2.fc36 Summary: Git annex special remotes made easy RPMs:python-annexremote-doc python3-annexremote Size:69.57 KiB Package: python-google-cloud-billing-1.3.2-1.fc36 Summary: Python Client for Google Cloud Billing API RPMs:python3-google-cloud-billing python3-google-cloud-billing-doc Size:267.79 KiB Package: python-google-cloud-billing-budgets-1.4.2-1.fc36 Summary: Python Client for Google Cloud Billing Budget API RPMs:python3-google-cloud-billing-budgets python3-google-cloud-billing-budgets-doc Size:268.94 KiB Package: python-google-cloud-build-3.5.0-1.fc36 Summary: Python Client for Google Cloud Build API RPMs:python3-google-cloud-build python3-google-cloud-build-doc Size:318.38 KiB Package: python-mkdocs-redirects-1.0.3-3.fc36 Summary: A MkDocs plugin for dynamic page redirects to prevent broken links RPMs:python3-mkdocs-redirects Size:15.26 KiB Package: rust-curve25519-dalek-3.1.0-1.fc36 Summary: Pure-Rust implementation of group operations on ristretto255 and Curve25519 RPMs:rust-curve25519-dalek+alloc-devel rust-curve25519-dalek+avx2_backend-devel rust-curve25519-dalek+default-devel rust-curve25519-dalek+fiat-crypto-devel rust-curve25519-dalek+fiat_u32_backend-devel rust-curve25519-dalek+fiat_u64_backend-devel rust-curve25519-dalek+nightly-devel rust-curve25519-dalek+packed_simd-devel rust-curve25519-dalek+serde-devel rust-curve25519-dalek+simd_backend-devel rust-curve25519-dalek+std-devel rust-curve25519-dalek+u32_backend-devel rust-curve25519-dalek+u64_backend-devel rust-curve25519-dalek-devel Size:539.97 KiB Package
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
Error: Problem: problem with installed package watchman-2021.04.26.00-1.fc34.x86_64 - watchman-2021.04.26.00-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides libfolly.so.2021.04.12.00()(64bit) needed by watchman-2021.04.12.00-1.fc35.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 10:13 PM wrote: > El mar, 07-09-2021 a las 18:14 +0200, Miroslav Suchý escribió: > > sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ > > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync > > > > Transaction Summary > > > Install 107 Packages > Upgrade 3805 Packages > Remove 13 Packages > Downgrade 32 Packages > > Total download size: 4.9 G > Is this ok [y/N]: > > > thx dev TEAM for make FEDORA better. as always GOOD WORK > > > -- > Héctor Louzao ->@hhlp > He / His / Him > Fedora Project Contributor > TZ=Europe/Madrid > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Hhlp > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > -- *Chedi Toueiti* * Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be responsible for the mental stability of any one member of our staff. ** My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right. *** I always try to go the extra mile at work, but my boss always finds me and brings me back. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000524] Upgrade perl-Digest to 1.20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-7ab47be34a has been pushed to the Fedora 35 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-7ab47be34a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996268] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20210820 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996268 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-7ab47be34a has been pushed to the Fedora 35 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-7ab47be34a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
El mar, 07-09-2021 a las 18:14 +0200, Miroslav Suchý escribió: > sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync Transaction Summary === = Install 107 Packages Upgrade 3805 Packages Remove 13 Packages Downgrade 32 Packages Total download size: 4.9 G Is this ok [y/N]: thx dev TEAM for make FEDORA better. as always GOOD WORK -- Héctor Louzao ->@hhlp He / His / Him Fedora Project Contributor TZ=Europe/Madrid https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Hhlp ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On 07.09.2021 18:14, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run: > > sudo dnf module reset '*' > sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync System 1 (Fedora 34 x86_64 server) System 2 (Fedora 34 / headless Raspberry Pi 3 / aarch64 ) System 3 (Fedora 34 x86_64 workstation) Clean upgrades, yay! System 4 (Fedora 34 x86_64 server) Error: Problem: package php-pecl-apcu-bc-1.0.5-6.fc34.x86_64 requires php(api) = 20190902-64, but none of the providers can be installed - package php-pecl-apcu-bc-1.0.5-6.fc34.x86_64 requires php(zend-abi) = 20190902-64, but none of the providers can be installed - php-common-7.4.23-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package php-pecl-apcu-bc-1.0.5-6.fc34.x86_64 System 5 (Fedora 34 x86_64 workstation w/ a lot of i686 libs) System 6 (Fedora 34 workstation laptop w/no i686 stuff) Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.25-1.fc34.x86_64 - 0ad-0.0.25-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides 0ad-data = 0.0.24b needed by 0ad-0.0.24b-3.fc35.x86_64 Problem 2: problem with installed package gnuradio-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64 - package gnuradio-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.0.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gnuradio-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 3: cannot install both codec2-1.0.0-1.fc35.2.x86_64 and codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64 - package gnuradio-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.0.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package lpcnetfreedv-0.2-9.fc35.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.1.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gr-funcube-1.0.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-audio.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gr-funcube-1.0.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-blocks.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gr-funcube-1.0.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-pmt.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gr-funcube-1.0.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-runtime.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package lpcnetfreedv-0.2-7.fc34.x86_64 - problem with installed package gr-funcube-1.0.0-1.fc34.x86_64 - lpcnetfreedv-0.2-7.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - gr-funcube-1.0.0-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository System 7 (Special Snowflake Fedora 33 server) This one is really bad, with pretty much anything relying on PHP breaking. (Problem 1 is a local site package that just needs rebuilding for F35's perl stuff) Problem 2: package php-horde-horde-lz4-1.0.10-16.fc33.x86_64 requires php(api) = 20190902-64, but none of the providers can be installed - package php-horde-horde-lz4-1.0.10-16.fc33.x86_64 requires php(zend-abi) = 20190902-64, but none of the providers can be installed - php-common-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package php-horde-horde-lz4-1.0.10-16.fc33.x86_64 Problem 3: package dokuwiki-20200729-4.fc35.noarch requires php-json, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both php-common-8.0.10~RC1-1.fc35.x86_64 and php-common-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 - cannot install both php-common-8.0.10-1.fc35.x86_64 and php-common-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 - problem with installed package dokuwiki-20200729-2.fc33.noarch - package php-imap-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 requires php-common(x86-64) = 7.4.23-1.fc33, but none of the providers can be installed - php-json-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - dokuwiki-20200729-2.fc33.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package php-imap-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 Problem 4: package php-pecl-xmlrpc-1.0.0~rc2-3.fc35.x86_64 requires php(api) = 20200930-64, but none of the providers can be installed - package php-pecl-xmlrpc-1.0.0~rc2-3.fc35.x86_64 requires php(zend-abi) = 20200930-64, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both php-common-8.0.10~RC1-1.fc35.x86_64 and php-common-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 - cannot install both php-common-8.0.10-1.fc35.x86_64 and php-common-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 - package php-horde-horde-lz4-1.0.10-16.fc33.x86_64 requires php(api) = 20190902-64, but none of the providers can be installed - package php-horde-horde-lz4-1.0.10-16.fc33.x86_64 requires php(zend-abi) = 20190902-64, but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package php-xmlrpc-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 - package
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
Miroslav Suchý writes: > Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ > > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > > distro-sync All good over here :) Thanks everyone who worked on F35! Dan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
Testing went fine in Virtualbox Updated a Fedora 34 Respin Image to the Fedora 35 from today and it went fine, but took its while as it was a 1,7GB download and 3443 package updates On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 9:53 PM Rex Dieter wrote: > Should be fixed with > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qt5-qtbase/c/70d501d41e08f3f2b18d54367d46c0be81afc73f > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 2:13 PM Marcin Juszkiewicz > wrote: > >> On 07.09.2021 20:47, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> > [root@puchatek hrw]# LANGUAGE=C LC_ALL=C LANG=C dnf --releasever=35 >> > --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 --enablerepo=updates-testing >> > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular distro-sync >> > Last metadata expiration check: 0:28:08 ago on Tue Sep 7 20:16:12 2021. >> > Error: >> > Problem: package qt5-qtbase-ibase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 requires >> > qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.2-16.fc34, but none of the providers can be >> > installed >> >- qt5-qtbase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade >> > repository >> >- problem with installed package >> qt5-qtbase-ibase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 >> > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) >> > >> > >> > Removed "qt5-qtbase-ibase" package and distrosync command went fine: >> >> From qt5-qtbase changelog it looks like this package was disabled due >> to Firebird FTBFS on s390x which was later fixed. >> >> So probably qt5-qtbase maintainers (Cc-ed) need to enable it back. >> >> ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
Should be fixed with https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qt5-qtbase/c/70d501d41e08f3f2b18d54367d46c0be81afc73f On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 2:13 PM Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > On 07.09.2021 20:47, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > > [root@puchatek hrw]# LANGUAGE=C LC_ALL=C LANG=C dnf --releasever=35 > > --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 --enablerepo=updates-testing > > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular distro-sync > > Last metadata expiration check: 0:28:08 ago on Tue Sep 7 20:16:12 2021. > > Error: > > Problem: package qt5-qtbase-ibase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 requires > > qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.2-16.fc34, but none of the providers can be > > installed > >- qt5-qtbase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > > repository > >- problem with installed package > qt5-qtbase-ibase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 > > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) > > > > > > Removed "qt5-qtbase-ibase" package and distrosync command went fine: > > From qt5-qtbase changelog it looks like this package was disabled due > to Firebird FTBFS on s390x which was later fixed. > > So probably qt5-qtbase maintainers (Cc-ed) need to enable it back. > > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
Hi! Everythings seems to be ok. Regards. Le 2021-09-07 18:14, Miroslav Suchý a écrit : Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. If you get this prompt: ... Total download size: XXX M Is this ok [y/N]: you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please report it against the appropriate package. Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 35. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F35FailsToInstall) reports: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1927313_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=12125305# Thank you Miroslav ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On 9/7/21 6:14 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. If you get this prompt: ... Total download size: XXX M Is this ok [y/N]: you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please report it against the appropriate package. I guess I'm lucky, I didn't get any error except a couple of COPR in need of an update. Best regards, Robert-André ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On 9/7/21 11:14 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run: Heck yeah! Sign me up! > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ > > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > > distro-sync > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. > > You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. > > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. Install 89 Packages Upgrade3833 Packages Remove6 Packages Downgrade22 Packages Total download size: 4.1 G Is this ok [y/N]: n Operation aborted. LGTM! Ohhh yeah!! Joe -- Joe Doss j...@solidadmin.com ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 2:24 PM Steven A. Falco wrote: > I get errors mentioning gnuradio and codec2, probably as a result of the > version change in codec2; i.e., codec2-1.0.0-1.fc35.2.x86_64 versus > codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64. > I'll take a look when I have a second, I thought I had already rebuilt gnuradio... Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
I get errors mentioning gnuradio and codec2, probably as a result of the version change in codec2; i.e., codec2-1.0.0-1.fc35.2.x86_64 versus codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64. Full report below. Steve # dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular distro-sync Fedora 35 - x86_64 9.8 MB/s | 78 MB 00:07 Fedora 35 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_645.1 kB/s | 2.5 kB 00:00 Fedora Modular 35 - x86_64 2.8 MB/s | 3.3 MB 00:01 Fedora 35 - x86_64 - Updates490 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Fedora Modular 35 - x86_64 - Updates427 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Fedora 35 - x86_64 - Test Updates 4.9 MB/s | 6.5 MB 00:01 Fedora Modular 35 - x86_64 - Test Updates 656 kB/s | 1.3 MB 00:02 RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Free 1.2 MB/s | 946 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Free - Updates 4.1 kB/s | 1.8 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Nonfree 508 kB/s | 243 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Nonfree - Updates2.1 kB/s | 1.2 kB 00:00 Fedora 35 - x86_64 - Updates Archive194 B/s | 531 B 00:02 Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package gnuradio-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64 - package gnuradio-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.0.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gnuradio-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 2: package gnuradio-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.0.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both codec2-1.0.0-1.fc35.2.x86_64 and codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64 - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-analog.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-audio.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-blocks.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-channels.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-digital.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-fec.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-fft.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-filter.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-network.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-pmt.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-qtgui.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-runtime.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-soapy.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-trellis.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-uhd.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-video-sdl.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-vocoder.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-wavelet.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-zeromq.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires gnuradio(x86-64) = 3.9.2.0-5.fc35, but none of the providers can be installed - package codec2-devel-1.0.0-1.fc35.2.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.1.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package codec2-devel-1.0.0-1.fc35.2.x86_64 requires codec2(x86-64) =
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On 9/7/21 1:57 PM, Digimer wrote: Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package python3-opencensus-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch - python3-opencensus-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides (python3.10dist(google-api-core) < 2 with python3.10dist(google-api-core) >= 1) needed by python3-opencensus-0.7.13-3.fc35.noarch Problem 3: problem with installed package python3-opencensus-ext-azure-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch - package python3-opencensus-ext-azure-0.7.13-3.fc35.noarch requires (python3.10dist(opencensus) < 1 with python3.10dist(opencensus) >= 0.7.13), but none of the providers can be installed - python3-opencensus-ext-azure-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides (python3.10dist(google-api-core) < 2 with python3.10dist(google-api-core) >= 1) needed by python3-opencensus-0.7.13-3.fc35.noarch Problem 4: problem with installed package python3-opencensus-ext-threading-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch - package python3-opencensus-ext-threading-0.7.13-3.fc35.noarch requires (python3.10dist(opencensus) < 1 with python3.10dist(opencensus) >= 0.7.13), but none of the providers can be installed - python3-opencensus-ext-threading-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides (python3.10dist(google-api-core) < 2 with python3.10dist(google-api-core) >= 1) needed by python3-opencensus-0.7.13-3.fc35.noarch (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) The python3-google-api-core fixes are pushed to testing[0] and are waiting for stable. [0] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-942a234915 -- Major Hayden OpenPGP_0x737051E0C1011FB1.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On 07.09.2021 20:47, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: [root@puchatek hrw]# LANGUAGE=C LC_ALL=C LANG=C dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular distro-sync Last metadata expiration check: 0:28:08 ago on Tue Sep 7 20:16:12 2021. Error: Problem: package qt5-qtbase-ibase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 requires qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.2-16.fc34, but none of the providers can be installed - qt5-qtbase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package qt5-qtbase-ibase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) Removed "qt5-qtbase-ibase" package and distrosync command went fine: From qt5-qtbase changelog it looks like this package was disabled due to Firebird FTBFS on s390x which was later fixed. So probably qt5-qtbase maintainers (Cc-ed) need to enable it back. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On 2021-09-07 12:14 p.m., Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. If you get this prompt: ... Total download size: XXX M Is this ok [y/N]: you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. 0 root@gravitar:/home/digimer# dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular distro-sync AnyDesk Fedora - stable 2.1 kB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 Fedora 35 - x86_64 13 MB/s | 78 MB 00:06 Fedora 35 - Source 3.0 MB/s | 7.3 MB 00:02 Fedora 35 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_6 3.1 kB/s | 2.5 kB 00:00 Fedora Modular 35 - x86_64 3.8 MB/s | 3.3 MB 00:00 Fedora 35 - x86_64 - Updates 170 B/s | 257 B 00:01 Fedora 35 - Updates Source 280 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Fedora Modular 35 - x86_64 - Updates 460 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Fedora 35 - x86_64 - Test Updates 6.6 MB/s | 6.5 MB 00:00 Fedora Modular 35 - x86_64 - Test Updat 859 kB/s | 1.3 MB 00:01 google-chrome 2.6 kB/s | 3.5 kB 00:01 RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Free 1.5 MB/s | 946 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Free tainted 8.9 kB/s | 6.1 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Free - Updat 6.0 kB/s | 1.8 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Nonfree 513 kB/s | 243 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Nonfree tain 14 kB/s | 4.2 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Nonfree - Up 3.7 kB/s | 1.2 kB 00:00 Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package python3-opencensus-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch - python3-opencensus-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides (python3.10dist(google-api-core) < 2 with python3.10dist(google-api-core) >= 1) needed by python3-opencensus-0.7.13-3.fc35.noarch Problem 2: package gstreamer-plugins-ugly-0.10.19-40.fc34.x86_64 requires libx264.so.161()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - x264-libs-0.161-6.20210412git55d517b.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gstreamer-plugins-ugly-0.10.19-40.fc34.x86_64 Problem 3: problem with installed package python3-opencensus-ext-azure-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch - package python3-opencensus-ext-azure-0.7.13-3.fc35.noarch requires (python3.10dist(opencensus) < 1 with python3.10dist(opencensus) >= 0.7.13), but none of the providers can be installed - python3-opencensus-ext-azure-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides (python3.10dist(google-api-core) < 2 with python3.10dist(google-api-core) >= 1) needed by python3-opencensus-0.7.13-3.fc35.noarch Problem 4: problem with installed package python3-opencensus-ext-threading-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch - package python3-opencensus-ext-threading-0.7.13-3.fc35.noarch requires (python3.10dist(opencensus) < 1 with python3.10dist(opencensus) >= 0.7.13), but none of the providers can be installed - python3-opencensus-ext-threading-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides (python3.10dist(google-api-core) < 2 with python3.10dist(google-api-core) >= 1) needed by python3-opencensus-0.7.13-3.fc35.noarch (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.com/w/ "I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On 07.09.2021 18:14, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync [root@puchatek hrw]# LANGUAGE=C LC_ALL=C LANG=C dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular distro-sync Last metadata expiration check: 0:28:08 ago on Tue Sep 7 20:16:12 2021. Error: Problem: package qt5-qtbase-ibase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 requires qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.2-16.fc34, but none of the providers can be installed - qt5-qtbase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package qt5-qtbase-ibase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) Removed "qt5-qtbase-ibase" package and distrosync command went fine: Install 118 Packages Upgrade4434 Packages Remove3 Packages Downgrade14 Packages Total download size: 4.3 G Is this ok [y/N]: ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On 7/9/21 13:14, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync I think I proposed this during the last round of updates, can we add "--assumeno" to this command line, to avoid potential unintended updates? This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. If you get this prompt: ... Total download size: XXX M Is this ok [y/N]: you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please report it against the appropriate package. Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 35. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F35FailsToInstall) reports: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1927313_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=12125305# No problems detected here Install 69 Packages Upgrade 2765 Packages Remove 6 Packages Downgrade 18 Packages Total download size: 3.6 G Operation aborted. Thank you Miroslav ___ devel mailing list --devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email todevel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 LGTM :) Install 22 Packages Upgrade 427 Packages Remove 3 Packages Total download size: 451 M Is this ok [y/N]: On Tue, 2021-09-07 at 18:14 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your > time and try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled > again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEumC8IPN+WURNbSUAE2VyCRPS8i0FAmE3qMQACgkQE2VyCRPS 8i3nXRAAhjup1xIRh1nESbMWpOxKq3iMkLOaoThllr6DAZcZlRy0pAgcgZSh5S1I bUWc3z9h9fIZgiSLLormSphezaO9YScWQVUgpA6OtMKdE89VGxV+t+Qbly7JBdpQ CE3zih2AsD2OhVVWuhLc//U1LL4nc57bY7FWnZuun0ynQ0LJI6qdR++wjvNSNczz +Huo7fdYLaijtmnJtOBU5RrUs/iDIP0Ph0iOI4upMyRTGmMESd8DflZ0wVTMsMam DBW0fgRIQFC32SlZsJmdVr2TZVkNuK0bK5YkS7x5eE1S6ClZsVApvWtd7IpuLx0G nzGb8BMx44/H/vJGjbggOLKBAdf0c3Z6DaJ+USrMPPfK5IlUDflF3CsECm+vk2ne XITZLwf8fCzkJkQWo4Bcu3M/pmt6igiNkKdsf+zGRUk2uMux/D4jEjujeB0U2Ki9 yP2Xj3tYBO1+d1roC24gJiWaVFrRbWSAKTb6xb0bs8nLCQDSYHxRKDfRt8eE9F7D v4V1dTosuA1h44BtxxPN6yRv5x7IQwrGwwKmLljVgP3h7PVBK1A6nVSz7aghvbyG Q6NxFqAkPeNs9Deq/xgWr9SCpYD4Zv/X7oVJsF2+QH1zd2rRu4mXa40XMR/J6xKy sal1WSzVssi9cHmvzE05cl+iSzsY9QuRWiemUjhqxeseexUOIn0= =rL+v -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 8:05 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 11:52 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > (...) > > > Package (co)maintainers > Status Change > > > > > cbi-plugins eclipse-sig, kdaniel, mbooth,3 > weeks ago > >orphan, rgrunber > > eclipse-ecf eclipse-sig, kdaniel, mbooth,3 > weeks ago > >orphan, rgrunber > > eclipse-egit eclipse-sig, jerboaa,3 > weeks ago > >jjohnstn, mbooth, orphan, > >rgrunber > > eclipse-emf eclipse-sig, jjohnstn, mbooth, 3 > weeks ago > >orphan, rgrunber > > eclipse-gef eclipse-sig, mbooth, orphan, 3 > weeks ago > >rgrunber > > eclipse-jgit eclipse-sig, jerboaa,3 > weeks ago > >jjohnstn, mbooth, orphan, > >rgrunber > > eclipse-license eclipse-sig, mbooth, orphan 3 > weeks ago > > eclipse-m2e-workspace eclipse-sig, mbooth, mizdebsk, 3 > weeks ago > >orphan > > eclipse-subclipse eclipse-sig, kdaniel, mbooth,3 > weeks ago > >orphan > > eclipse-webtools eclipse-sig, galileo, mbooth,3 > weeks ago > >orphan > > tycho eclipse-sig, kdaniel, mbooth,3 > weeks ago > >mizdebsk, orphan > > I wonder if we should retire the remaining eclipse packages from f35 > before the final freeze, as well? The main "eclipse" package is > already gone, so most of them are not installable anyway and will > probably cause upgrade issues (this may be a case for > fedora-obsolete-packages?). > Yes please! > > Fabio > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > -- Aleksandar Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse Team ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 11:52 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > (...) > Package (co)maintainers Status > Change > > cbi-plugins eclipse-sig, kdaniel, mbooth,3 weeks ago >orphan, rgrunber > eclipse-ecf eclipse-sig, kdaniel, mbooth,3 weeks ago >orphan, rgrunber > eclipse-egit eclipse-sig, jerboaa,3 weeks ago >jjohnstn, mbooth, orphan, >rgrunber > eclipse-emf eclipse-sig, jjohnstn, mbooth, 3 weeks ago >orphan, rgrunber > eclipse-gef eclipse-sig, mbooth, orphan, 3 weeks ago >rgrunber > eclipse-jgit eclipse-sig, jerboaa,3 weeks ago >jjohnstn, mbooth, orphan, >rgrunber > eclipse-license eclipse-sig, mbooth, orphan 3 weeks ago > eclipse-m2e-workspace eclipse-sig, mbooth, mizdebsk, 3 weeks ago >orphan > eclipse-subclipse eclipse-sig, kdaniel, mbooth,3 weeks ago >orphan > eclipse-webtools eclipse-sig, galileo, mbooth,3 weeks ago >orphan > tycho eclipse-sig, kdaniel, mbooth,3 weeks ago >mizdebsk, orphan I wonder if we should retire the remaining eclipse packages from f35 before the final freeze, as well? The main "eclipse" package is already gone, so most of them are not installable anyway and will probably cause upgrade issues (this may be a case for fedora-obsolete-packages?). Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
Problem 1: package arduino-core-1:1.8.13-5.fc34.noarch requires mvn(org.ow2.asm:asm-all), but none of the providers can be installed - objectweb-asm-8.0.1-2.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package arduino-core-1:1.8.13-5.fc34.noarch Problem 2: package dhcp-compat-12:4.4.2-11.b1.fc34.x86_64 requires dhcp-relay = 12:4.4.2-11.b1.fc34, but none of the providers can be installed - dhcp-relay-12:4.4.2-11.b1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package dhcp-compat-12:4.4.2-11.b1.fc34.x86_64 Arduino was orphaned and then retired due to lack of maintainer. Looking at dhcp's pagure repo, the dhcp-compat subpackage was dropped recently. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000524] Upgrade perl-Digest to 1.20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-a5f90eba60 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-a5f90eba60 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996268] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20210820 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996268 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-a5f90eba60 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-a5f90eba60 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1967434] perl-CGI-4.53 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967434 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-3848097ce2 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-3848097ce2 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956708] perl-CGI-4.52 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956708 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-3848097ce2 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-3848097ce2 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000524] Upgrade perl-Digest to 1.20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-92b9d61173 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-92b9d61173 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996268] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20210820 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996268 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-92b9d61173 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-92b9d61173 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
Hey! Started helping out with this now during this evening On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 6:15 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ > > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. > > You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please > report it against the appropriate package. > > Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > Fedora 35. Please check existing reports against > > fedora-obsolete-packages first: > > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > > and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F35FailsToInstall) > reports: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1927313_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=12125305# > > Thank you > Miroslav > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 06:13:32PM +0200, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 5:45 PM Zebediah Figura > wrote: > > On 9/7/21 2:12 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 05:59:41PM -0500, Zebediah Figura wrote: > > >> Thanks everyone for their input. > > >> > > >> There seems to be a consensus that Fedora would prefer that we use > > >> their MinGW dynamic libraries. However, this leaves a couple of > > >> questions: > > >> > > >> * As I described in [1], we *may* be able to hack things in the Wine > > >> loader such that we can use unmodified dynamic libraries. However, > > >> it's not fully clear yet that it's feasible. If it turns out to be > > >> infeasible, what preferences does Fedora have? (Renamed dynamic > > >> libraries shipped separately, shipped as part of Wine, static > > >> libraries, etc...) > > > > > > Adding -static subpackages is the easiest option from our point of > > > view. As I mentioned in the previous email this would mean adjusting > > > an existing spec such as: > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-gnutls/blob/rawhide/f/mingw-gnutls.spec > > > so that it builds the static library. It's a simple and obvious > > > change. > > > > > > But can Wine use the static library built this way unmodified? > > > And are there any other implications versus using a DLL? > > > > I believe we should be able to use unmodified static libraries, yes. > > > > There are the usual implications—more space on disk and in memory; in > > Wine's case it doesn't really matter a lot, but we do still have cases > > of multiple DLLs that use the same library. It may be possible to use > > helper DLLs to avoid that in most cases. > > > > And, of course, I hate developing with static libraries :-( > > Could you perhaps just build a new dynamic library (with the adjusted > name) by linking an empty/dummy object with the Fedora-provided static > library? (Not sure if that's possible, but it's what came to my mind > when reading this thread.) I doubt this is going to be possible. Windows PE DLLs have some complicated machinery for declaring exported symbols. Plus (like ELF) I imagine the compiler needs to generate quite different code for static vs dynamic. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests. http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. If you get this prompt: ... Total download size: XXX M Is this ok [y/N]: you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please report it against the appropriate package. Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 35. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F35FailsToInstall) reports: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1927313_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=12125305# Thank you Miroslav ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 5:45 PM Zebediah Figura wrote: > On 9/7/21 2:12 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 05:59:41PM -0500, Zebediah Figura wrote: > >> Thanks everyone for their input. > >> > >> There seems to be a consensus that Fedora would prefer that we use > >> their MinGW dynamic libraries. However, this leaves a couple of > >> questions: > >> > >> * As I described in [1], we *may* be able to hack things in the Wine > >> loader such that we can use unmodified dynamic libraries. However, > >> it's not fully clear yet that it's feasible. If it turns out to be > >> infeasible, what preferences does Fedora have? (Renamed dynamic > >> libraries shipped separately, shipped as part of Wine, static > >> libraries, etc...) > > > > Adding -static subpackages is the easiest option from our point of > > view. As I mentioned in the previous email this would mean adjusting > > an existing spec such as: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-gnutls/blob/rawhide/f/mingw-gnutls.spec > > so that it builds the static library. It's a simple and obvious > > change. > > > > But can Wine use the static library built this way unmodified? > > And are there any other implications versus using a DLL? > > I believe we should be able to use unmodified static libraries, yes. > > There are the usual implications—more space on disk and in memory; in > Wine's case it doesn't really matter a lot, but we do still have cases > of multiple DLLs that use the same library. It may be possible to use > helper DLLs to avoid that in most cases. > > And, of course, I hate developing with static libraries :-( Could you perhaps just build a new dynamic library (with the adjusted name) by linking an empty/dummy object with the Fedora-provided static library? (Not sure if that's possible, but it's what came to my mind when reading this thread.) -- Ondrej Mosnacek Software Engineer, Linux Security - SELinux kernel Red Hat, Inc. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-09-08 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #meetingname EPEL #topic Intros #topic Old Business #topic EPEL-7 #topic EPEL-8 #topic EPEL-9 #topic Openfloor #endmeeting Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9854/ ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing proftpd-1.3.5e-11.el7 yascreen-1.86-1.el7 Details about builds: proftpd-1.3.5e-11.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-7f33ec2b58) Flexible, stable and highly-configurable FTP server Update Information: This update fixes an issue of memory disclosure to RADIUS servers by mod_radius, particularly where short passwords are used. ChangeLog: * Tue Sep 7 2021 Paul Howarth - 1.3.5e-11 - Fix memory disclosure to RADIUS servers by mod_radius (#2001690) https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/issues/1284 https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/pull/1285 References: [ 1 ] Bug #2001690 - proftpd: memory disclosure to RADIUS servers by mod_radius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001690 yascreen-1.86-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-ffb7118d2f) Yet Another Screen Library (lib(n)curses alternative) Update Information: Update to latest ver 1.86 ChangeLog: * Tue Sep 7 2021 Boian Bonev - 1.86-1 - Update to latest ver 1.86 * Fri Jul 23 2021 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.85-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild * Thu Jan 28 2021 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.85-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-303db869be chromium-93.0.4577.63-1.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing proftpd-1.3.6e-4.el8 sparse-0.6.4-1.el8 yascreen-1.86-1.el8 Details about builds: proftpd-1.3.6e-4.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-0123b5931c) Flexible, stable and highly-configurable FTP server Update Information: This update fixes an issue of memory disclosure to RADIUS servers by mod_radius, particularly where short passwords are used. ChangeLog: * Tue Sep 7 2021 Paul Howarth - 1.3.6e-4 - Fix memory disclosure to RADIUS servers by mod_radius (#2001690) https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/issues/1284 https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/pull/1285 * Tue Jun 29 2021 Paul Howarth - 1.3.6e-3 - Avoid segfaults with TLSv1.3 https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/issues/1063 https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/commit/adf43dd4ddaab0332e74abc86bbcef9cf27ee54a - Use %license unconditionally References: [ 1 ] Bug #2001690 - proftpd: memory disclosure to RADIUS servers by mod_radius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001690 sparse-0.6.4-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-41af5a335e) A semantic parser of source files Update Information: Update to 0.6.4 release. ChangeLog: * Tue Sep 7 2021 Jeff Layton - 0.6.4-1 - Update to 0.6.4 release yascreen-1.86-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-ad220b5e6a) Yet Another Screen Library (lib(n)curses alternative) Update Information: Update to latest ver 1.86 ChangeLog: * Tue Sep 7 2021 Boian Bonev - 1.86-1 - Update to latest ver 1.86 * Fri Jul 23 2021 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.85-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild * Thu Jan 28 2021 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.85-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
On 9/7/21 2:12 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 05:59:41PM -0500, Zebediah Figura wrote: Thanks everyone for their input. There seems to be a consensus that Fedora would prefer that we use their MinGW dynamic libraries. However, this leaves a couple of questions: * As I described in [1], we *may* be able to hack things in the Wine loader such that we can use unmodified dynamic libraries. However, it's not fully clear yet that it's feasible. If it turns out to be infeasible, what preferences does Fedora have? (Renamed dynamic libraries shipped separately, shipped as part of Wine, static libraries, etc...) Adding -static subpackages is the easiest option from our point of view. As I mentioned in the previous email this would mean adjusting an existing spec such as: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-gnutls/blob/rawhide/f/mingw-gnutls.spec so that it builds the static library. It's a simple and obvious change. But can Wine use the static library built this way unmodified? And are there any other implications versus using a DLL? I believe we should be able to use unmodified static libraries, yes. There are the usual implications—more space on disk and in memory; in Wine's case it doesn't really matter a lot, but we do still have cases of multiple DLLs that use the same library. It may be possible to use helper DLLs to avoid that in most cases. And, of course, I hate developing with static libraries :-( * Since most other distributions don't ship any mingw libraries (yet), and since Fedora doesn't ship all of the libraries we need yet either, we will probably need to include code in wine to fall back to imported sources or submodules. Is this acceptable to be used in Fedora, at least on a temporary basis? There is a bundling policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling As a general rule of thumb it's better if the upstream package can be either configured (or maybe automatically) to unbundle those dependencies for which system equivalents exist. eg: ./configure --without-bundled-gnutls would use the system mingw-gnutls. Without that flag it might use a bundled version that it carries along. The bundling policy matters because of security concerns. I would say the other thing about bundling: Please don't add private patches to the bundled libraries! Huge pain for distributors because it effectively means we have no idea what is being bundled, which again has big security implications when someone has to work out if some bundled library is vulnerable to a CVE. Get the patches to the upstream projects. I'm pretty sure we don't want to add any private patches, so at least there's that. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
I'll take php-google-apiclient1, php-pear-OLE, and php-fedora-autoloader to keep Moodle in Fedora, but if someone more involved in PHP wants them instead or wants to be a co-maintainer, please let me know. -- Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, September 7th, 2021 at 4:51 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life > > Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected > > packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package > or > > retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your > > package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets > retired. > > Request package ownership via the Take button in he left column on > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ > > Full report available at: > > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-09-07.txt > > grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain. > > For human readable dependency chains, > > see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ > > For all orphaned packages, > > see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan > > Package (co)maintainers Status Change > = > > ant-contrib java-maint-sig, mizdebsk, 6 weeks ago > > orphan > > apache-ivy java-maint-sig, mizdebsk, 2 weeks ago > > orphan > > apache-rat mizdebsk, orphan 4 weeks ago > > bugzilla2fedmsg orphan 4 weeks ago > > cbi-plugins eclipse-sig, kdaniel, mbooth, 3 weeks ago > > orphan, rgrunber > > ckeditor orphan 1 weeks ago > > dnstracer orphan 0 weeks ago > > drupal7 asrob, jsmith, orphan, 1 weeks ago > > pfrields > > drupal7-active_tags asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-admin_language asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-backup_migrate asrob, orphan, pfrields, 1 weeks ago > > sdodson > > drupal7-boxes asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-cck asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-chosen asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-context asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-crumbs asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-cs_adaptive_image asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-domain asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-domain_locale asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-domain_views asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-drafty orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-drush_language asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-ds asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-entity asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-entity_translation asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-eva asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-features_extra asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-fences asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-field_permissions asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-file_entity asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-file_entity_inline asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-fivestar asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-i18n asrob, orphan, pfrields, 1 weeks ago > > sdodson > > drupal7-i18n_boxes asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-i18nviews asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-jquery_update asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-l10n_client asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-l10n_pconfig asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-l10n_server asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-l10n_update asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-lang_dropdown asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-language_cookie asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-language_switcher asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-languageicons asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-libraries asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-link asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-locale_auto_import asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-locale_cookie asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-markdown asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-menu_token asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-metatag asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-migrate asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-path_breadcrumbs asrob, orphan 1 weeks ago > > drupal7-potx asrob, orphan 1
Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Prioritized bugs and issues
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 7:00 AM wrote: > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-09-08 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00 > America/Indiana/Indianapolis >At fedora-meetin...@libera.chat > > More information available at: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/program_management/prioritized_bugs/ > We will discuss the following nominated bug: * Screen stays black after suspend / logout when used on amd apu laptop. — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988528 As well as the following previously accepted bug: * SELinux is preventing gnome-session-c from 'write' accesses on the sock_file dbus-7hye6voX3Y. — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949712 -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Review swap for new azure-cli dependency
Hey there, I'm in the process of updating azure-cli to 2.28.0, but it added a new requirement for another SDK component called azure-synapse-managedprivateendpoints. That one isn't packaged currently, but I've proposed a package in BZ 2001918[0]. The package is quite simple and matches most of the other python-azure-* SDK components that are already packaged. Would someone be able to do a review swap so I can get azure-cli updated? I'm most familiar reviewing Python, C/C++, and golang, but I can always learn something new. Thank you! [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2001918 -- Major Hayden OpenPGP_0x737051E0C1011FB1.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1967434] perl-CGI-4.53 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967434 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-3848097ce2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34 Modular. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-3848097ce2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956708] perl-CGI-4.52 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956708 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-3848097ce2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34 Modular. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-3848097ce2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Release rpkg-1.63 and fedpkg-1.41
Hi all, a new version rpkg-1.63 together with fedpkg-1.41 are released containing both features and bugfixes. Currently, packages for Fedora 34 are present in stable repositories. Fedora 33, Fedora 35, epel7, epel8 are in the testing repositories. Feel free to try these waiting distributions in Bodhi. Changelog (web documentation): https://docs.pagure.org/rpkg/releases/1.63.html https://docs.pagure.org/fedpkg/releases/1.41.html Updates: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?builds=rpkg-1.63-2.el8=rpkg-1.63-2.el7=rpkg-1.63-2.fc33=rpkg-1.63-2.fc34=rpkg-1.63-2.fc35=rpkg-1.63-2.fc36=fedpkg-1.41-1.el8=fedpkg-1.41-1.el7=fedpkg-1.41-1.fc33=fedpkg-1.41-1.fc34=fedpkg-1.41-1.fc35=fedpkg-1.41-1.fc36 Alternative link: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=rpkg=1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=fedpkg=1 rpkg is also available from PyPI. Thanks to all contributors. Regards ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets retired. Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ Full report available at: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-09-07.txt grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain. For human readable dependency chains, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change ant-contrib java-maint-sig, mizdebsk,6 weeks ago orphan apache-ivyjava-maint-sig, mizdebsk,2 weeks ago orphan apache-ratmizdebsk, orphan 4 weeks ago bugzilla2fedmsg orphan 4 weeks ago cbi-plugins eclipse-sig, kdaniel, mbooth,3 weeks ago orphan, rgrunber ckeditor orphan 1 weeks ago dnstracer orphan 0 weeks ago drupal7 asrob, jsmith, orphan, 1 weeks ago pfrields drupal7-active_tags asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago drupal7-admin_languageasrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-backup_migrateasrob, orphan, pfrields, 1 weeks ago sdodson drupal7-boxes asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-cck asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago drupal7-chosenasrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago drupal7-context asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago drupal7-crumbsasrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-cs_adaptive_image asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-domainasrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-domain_locale asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-domain_views asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-draftyorphan 1 weeks ago drupal7-drush_languageasrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-dsasrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-entityasrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago drupal7-entity_translationasrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-eva asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago drupal7-features_extraasrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-fencesasrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-field_permissions asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago drupal7-file_entity asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-file_entity_inlineasrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-fivestar asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago drupal7-i18n asrob, orphan, pfrields, 1 weeks ago sdodson drupal7-i18n_boxesasrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-i18nviews asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-jquery_update asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago drupal7-l10n_client asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-l10n_pconfig asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-l10n_server asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-l10n_update asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-lang_dropdown asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-language_cookie asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-language_switcher asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-languageicons asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-libraries asrob, orphan, sdodson
Re: perl-Data-Properties License change
* Emmanuel Seyman [25/07/2021 22:42] : > > > Sometime over the coming week, I'm going to update the > perl-Data-Properties package from the current 0.02 to 1.05. > Among other changes, the license changes from ASL 2.0 to the Perl > license (GPL+ or Artistic). Upstream has re-released 0.02 with the version number 1.06 so, in a few days, the changes in the 1.05 version (including the license change) will be reverted. Sorry for the noise, folks. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: perl-Data-Properties License change
* Emmanuel Seyman [25/07/2021 22:42] : > > > Sometime over the coming week, I'm going to update the > perl-Data-Properties package from the current 0.02 to 1.05. > Among other changes, the license changes from ASL 2.0 to the Perl > license (GPL+ or Artistic). Upstream has re-released 0.02 with the version number 1.06 so, in a few days, the changes in the 1.05 version (including the license change) will be reverted. Sorry for the noise, folks. Emmanuel ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Boot menu always displayed again?
Dne 07. 09. 21 v 9:26 Hans de Goede napsal(a): Hi, On 9/6/21 5:13 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Not sure if that is intentional, but if I am not mistaken, boot menu used to be hidden if there were no issues, but it seems to be always on ATM. Is this intentional? What is the output of running: sudo grub2-editenv - list ~~~ $ sudo grub2-editenv - list boot_success=1 boot_indeterminate=0 saved_entry=ec300db9bfdf4776bc07b7f4281374a5-5.14.1-300.fc35.x86_64 $ uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 5.14.1-300.fc35.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Sep 3 16:27:33 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ~~~ Also is this a multi-boot system, or does grub at least think it is a multiboot system? IOW does your grub-menu have a "Windows" boot entry? No, it is not, never was, never will be. I have reported this against grub2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001885 Vít On multiboot systems the menu is always shown so that you can pick Windows at boot. Regards, Hans ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1997397] perl-Data-Properties-1.06 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997397 Johan Vromans changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|unspecified |urgent Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Priority|unspecified |urgent CC||jvrom...@squirrel.nl --- Comment #1 from Johan Vromans --- Version 1.05 has incompatibilites with the preceding version 0.02. Please upgrade to 1.06 ASAP to fix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets retired. Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ Full report available at: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-09-07.txt grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain. For human readable dependency chains, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change ant-contrib java-maint-sig, mizdebsk,6 weeks ago orphan apache-ivyjava-maint-sig, mizdebsk,2 weeks ago orphan apache-ratmizdebsk, orphan 4 weeks ago bugzilla2fedmsg orphan 4 weeks ago cbi-plugins eclipse-sig, kdaniel, mbooth,3 weeks ago orphan, rgrunber ckeditor orphan 1 weeks ago dnstracer orphan 0 weeks ago drupal7 asrob, jsmith, orphan, 1 weeks ago pfrields drupal7-active_tags asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago drupal7-admin_languageasrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-backup_migrateasrob, orphan, pfrields, 1 weeks ago sdodson drupal7-boxes asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-cck asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago drupal7-chosenasrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago drupal7-context asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago drupal7-crumbsasrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-cs_adaptive_image asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-domainasrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-domain_locale asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-domain_views asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-draftyorphan 1 weeks ago drupal7-drush_languageasrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-dsasrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-entityasrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago drupal7-entity_translationasrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-eva asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago drupal7-features_extraasrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-fencesasrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-field_permissions asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago drupal7-file_entity asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-file_entity_inlineasrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-fivestar asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago drupal7-i18n asrob, orphan, pfrields, 1 weeks ago sdodson drupal7-i18n_boxesasrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-i18nviews asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-jquery_update asrob, orphan, sdodson 1 weeks ago drupal7-l10n_client asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-l10n_pconfig asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-l10n_server asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-l10n_update asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-lang_dropdown asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-language_cookie asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-language_switcher asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-languageicons asrob, orphan1 weeks ago drupal7-libraries asrob, orphan, sdodson
Fedora-Cloud-34-20210907.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210906.0): ID: 970565 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/970565 ID: 970571 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/970571 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Review swaps: python-keyrings-alt and python-annexremote
Hi folks, I'd like to get these two Python modules reviewed please. Would anyone like to swap reviews? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001678 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001684 They're required to package datalad, which is required for spikeextractors---both on the Neuro SIG's package queue. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000524] Upgrade perl-Digest to 1.20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-a5f90eba60 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33 Modular. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-a5f90eba60 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996268] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20210820 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996268 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-a5f90eba60 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33 Modular. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-a5f90eba60 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996268] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20210820 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996268 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-92b9d61173 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34 Modular. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-92b9d61173 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000524] Upgrade perl-Digest to 1.20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-92b9d61173 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34 Modular. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-92b9d61173 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996268] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20210820 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996268 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-7ab47be34a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35 Modular. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-7ab47be34a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000524] Upgrade perl-Digest to 1.20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-7ab47be34a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35 Modular. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-7ab47be34a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-33-20210907.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210906.0): ID: 970549 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/970549 ID: 970555 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/970555 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Boot menu always displayed again?
Hi, On 9/6/21 5:13 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Not sure if that is intentional, but if I am not mistaken, boot menu used to > be hidden if there were no issues, but it seems to be always on ATM. Is this > intentional? What is the output of running: sudo grub2-editenv - list Also is this a multi-boot system, or does grub at least think it is a multiboot system? IOW does your grub-menu have a "Windows" boot entry? On multiboot systems the menu is always shown so that you can pick Windows at boot. Regards, Hans ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 05:59:41PM -0500, Zebediah Figura wrote: > Thanks everyone for their input. > > There seems to be a consensus that Fedora would prefer that we use > their MinGW dynamic libraries. However, this leaves a couple of > questions: > > * As I described in [1], we *may* be able to hack things in the Wine > loader such that we can use unmodified dynamic libraries. However, > it's not fully clear yet that it's feasible. If it turns out to be > infeasible, what preferences does Fedora have? (Renamed dynamic > libraries shipped separately, shipped as part of Wine, static > libraries, etc...) Adding -static subpackages is the easiest option from our point of view. As I mentioned in the previous email this would mean adjusting an existing spec such as: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-gnutls/blob/rawhide/f/mingw-gnutls.spec so that it builds the static library. It's a simple and obvious change. But can Wine use the static library built this way unmodified? And are there any other implications versus using a DLL? > * Since most other distributions don't ship any mingw libraries > (yet), and since Fedora doesn't ship all of the libraries we need > yet either, we will probably need to include code in wine to fall > back to imported sources or submodules. Is this acceptable to be > used in Fedora, at least on a temporary basis? There is a bundling policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling As a general rule of thumb it's better if the upstream package can be either configured (or maybe automatically) to unbundle those dependencies for which system equivalents exist. eg: ./configure --without-bundled-gnutls would use the system mingw-gnutls. Without that flag it might use a bundled version that it carries along. The bundling policy matters because of security concerns. I would say the other thing about bundling: Please don't add private patches to the bundled libraries! Huge pain for distributors because it effectively means we have no idea what is being bundled, which again has big security implications when someone has to work out if some bundled library is vulnerable to a CVE. Get the patches to the upstream projects. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
