Re: Package owner required for ImageMagick

[Michael Cronenworth]

On 10/14/21 11:17 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:

Also note that ImageMagick is in the unusual position of not actually
being upgraded to the latest version. One of the first things that
you'll probably want to look at is upgrading it to ImageMagick 7.x.
ImageMagick 6.x is not maintained upstream as far as I can tell.


Yes, and the maintainer prior to me had tried to push a 7.x update and then promptly 
abandoned the package after a mess was made.


ImageMagick 7.x has a different API and requires porting apps. Apps are not 
interested in 7.x and will use 6.x until they're forced to change.


@Luya, apologies for not providing you with a little more knowledge of the package. 
It isn't a simple package to maintain. Upgrades require great, great care and lots 
of rebuilds and alignment with other packages on every update.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2014723] New: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.15 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014723

Bug ID: 2014723
   Summary: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.15 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 0.15
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.14-3.fc35
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/JavaScript-Minifier-XS/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3010/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014723
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Change: Ansible 5 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 07:44:12PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 7:29 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia  wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 4:32 PM Ben Cotton  wrote:
> > >
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ansible5
> > >
> > > == Summary ==
> > >
> > > The ansible project has re-organized how they release and distribute
> > > ansible. This change moves Fedora to be in sync with those changes and
> > > retires the old 'ansible classic/2.9.x' package in favor of a
> > > 'ansible' package that pulls in ansible-core (the engine) and includes
> > > all the collections in upstream ansible releases.
> >
> > I wrote to the various upstream bugtrackers about this already. The
> > re-org upstream is confusing and unwelcome, and creates a stack of
> > problems.

Yeah, it's been confusing to people for sure, but it does also help out
a lot with other problems. :( 

> > I would publish ansible-core as just that, with a "Provides: ansible
> > %{version{-%{release}" and even "Obsoletes: ansible >= %{version}".

That would radically diverge from upstream and cause _more_ confusion. 

It's unfortunate that the 'ansible' name meaning has changed, but
ignoring it or overriding the upstream name isn't going to help matters.

> > The new pypi.org tarball published as "ansible" isn't. It's a tarball
> > of components from the Ansible galaxy collection, and it is
> > unnecessary for the basic ansible-core operation, which are much
> > bulkier than the previous "ansible" and contains approximately 145
> > distinct software licenses. That is a sign of a packaging problem
> > that I've discussed on the pypi.org issues pages, at
> 
> I realize I was unclear. The new "ansible" tarball from pypi.org has
> 145 distinct software licenses, and many distinct galaxy collection
> published ansible modules. The new "ansible-core" tarball is much
> smaller, even smaller than the old "ansible" package due to some bulky
> modules being transferred to the galaxy collection.

Right.
 
> Splitting off the variety of add-on modules makes sense. Replacing the
> core package with the add-on modules and moving aside the core seems
> exactly backwards.

Well, I think the thought was that people would find ansible-core too
bare bones after having used ansible-2.9/classic with all it's included
modules.

If you don't want the collections, just install ansible-core.

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: ImageMagick update

[Reon Beon via devel]

Cool. What packages don't use the 7?

This is from 2017, anything new since then?
https://legacy.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?t=32622
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: ImageMagick update

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sat, 2021-10-16 at 06:39 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Michael Catanzaro wrote on 2021/10/16 0:37:
> > On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 10:22:36 AM +0200, Remi Collet <
> > fed...@famillecollet.com> wrote:
> > > Sorry, but such update, with soname change is not acceptable in
> > > stable
> > > branches.
> > 
> > Hi Luya,
> > 
> > Please note that soname changes are allowed in rawhide only after a
> > one-week notice period. Since you did not give other maintainers
> > notice, everything that depends on ImageMagick is now likely broken
> > in rawhide
> > 
> 
> Can we untag rawhide new ImageMagick, create side tag and move new
> ImageMagick to side tag?
> 

I Like the idea , is it possible ? 

> Regards,
> Mamoru
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: ImageMagick update

[Luya Tshimbalanga]

On 2021-10-15 08:37, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 10:22:36 AM +0200, Remi Collet 
 wrote:

Sorry, but such update, with soname change is not acceptable in stable
branches.


Hi Luya,

Please note that soname changes are allowed in rawhide only after a 
one-week notice period. Since you did not give other maintainers 
notice, everything that depends on ImageMagick is now likely broken in 
rawhide




Ah ok. I'll be careful next time.

--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora Design Team
Fedora Design Suite maintainer
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Test-Announce] 2021-10-18 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 35 Blocker Review Meeting

[Adam Williamson]

# F35 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2021-10-18
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat

Hi folks! We have 6 proposed Final blockers and 2 proposed Final freeze
exceptions to review, so let's have a review meeting on Monday.

If you have time this weekend, you can take a look at the proposed or
accepted blockers before the meeting -  the full lists can be found
here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ .

Remember, you can also now vote on bugs outside of review meetings! If
you look at the bug list in the blockerbugs app, you'll see links
labeled "Vote!" next to all proposed blockers and freeze exceptions.
Those links take you to tickets where you can vote.
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review has instructions on how
exactly you do it. We usually go through the tickets shortly before the
meeting and apply any clear votes, so the meeting will just cover bugs
where there wasn't a clear outcome in the ticket voting yet. **THIS
MEANS IF YOU VOTE NOW, THE MEETING WILL BE SHORTER!**

We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the 
Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not 
fixed. Information on the release criteria for F35 can be found on the 
wiki [0].

For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, 
check out these links:
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process

And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting 
works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out 
the SOP on the wiki:
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting

Have a good weekend and see you on Monday!

[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2021-10-18 Fedora QA Meeting

[Adam Williamson]

[re-send with correct date, sorry]

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't
have much for the agenda, and we're in F35 Final crunch mode ATM.
There will be a blocker review meeting.

If you're aware of anything it would be useful to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting.

Thanks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2021-10-11 Fedora QA Meeting

[Adam Williamson]

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't
have much for the agenda, and we're in F35 Final crunch mode ATM.
There will be a blocker review meeting.

If you're aware of anything it would be useful to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting.

Thanks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2014714] New: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.50 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014714

Bug ID: 2014714
   Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.50 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-DateTime-TimeZone
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: iarn...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 2.50
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.49-1.fc36
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-TimeZone/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2801/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014714
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Change: Ansible 5 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Nico Kadel-Garcia]

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 7:29 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia  wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 4:32 PM Ben Cotton  wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ansible5
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > The ansible project has re-organized how they release and distribute
> > ansible. This change moves Fedora to be in sync with those changes and
> > retires the old 'ansible classic/2.9.x' package in favor of a
> > 'ansible' package that pulls in ansible-core (the engine) and includes
> > all the collections in upstream ansible releases.
>
> I wrote to the various upstream bugtrackers about this already. The
> re-org upstream is confusing and unwelcome, and creates a stack of
> problems.
>
> I would publish ansible-core as just that, with a "Provides: ansible
> %{version{-%{release}" and even "Obsoletes: ansible >= %{version}".
> The new pypi.org tarball published as "ansible" isn't. It's a tarball
> of components from the Ansible galaxy collection, and it is
> unnecessary for the basic ansible-core operation, which are much
> bulkier than the previous "ansible" and contains approximately 145
> distinct software licenses. That is a sign of a packaging problem
> that I've discussed on the pypi.org issues pages, at

I realize I was unclear. The new "ansible" tarball from pypi.org has
145 distinct software licenses, and many distinct galaxy collection
published ansible modules. The new "ansible-core" tarball is much
smaller, even smaller than the old "ansible" package due to some bulky
modules being transferred to the galaxy collection.

Splitting off the variety of add-on modules makes sense. Replacing the
core package with the add-on modules and moving aside the core seems
exactly backwards.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Change: Ansible 5 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Nico Kadel-Garcia]

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 4:32 PM Ben Cotton  wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ansible5
>
> == Summary ==
>
> The ansible project has re-organized how they release and distribute
> ansible. This change moves Fedora to be in sync with those changes and
> retires the old 'ansible classic/2.9.x' package in favor of a
> 'ansible' package that pulls in ansible-core (the engine) and includes
> all the collections in upstream ansible releases.

I wrote to the various upstream bugtrackers about this already. The
re-org upstream is confusing and unwelcome, and creates a stack of
problems.

I would publish ansible-core as just that, with a "Provides: ansible
%{version{-%{release}" and even "Obsoletes: ansible >= %{version}".
The new pypi.org tarball published as "ansible" isn't. It's a tarball
of components from the Ansible galaxy collection, and it is
unnecessary for the basic ansible-core operation, which are much
bulkier than the previous "ansible" and contains approximately 145
distinct software licenses. That is a sign of a packaging problem
that I've discussed on the pypi.org issues pages, at

The new "ansible" labeled pypi.org module has no full provenance I've
been able to find. It assembles a number of distinct galaxy collection
published re[ps from https://github.com/orgs/ansible-community/, but
assembled without any reference tool that I can find or detect any
documentation for. I'd say that this is messy and not ready for
bundling, and hope that its authors can clean this up.

Given choices I'd publish the "ansible_collections" tarball as just
such an RPM, since it is installed in
/usr/lib/python3.[subversion]/site-packages/ansible_collections/ and
should have been labeled that way. The "ansible" package could be a
meta package with "Requires: ansible-core ansible_collections" to
avoid the versioning confusion.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: ImageMagick update

[Mamoru TASAKA]

Michael Catanzaro wrote on 2021/10/16 0:37:

On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 10:22:36 AM +0200, Remi Collet 
 wrote:

Sorry, but such update, with soname change is not acceptable in stable
branches.


Hi Luya,

Please note that soname changes are allowed in rawhide only after a one-week 
notice period. Since you did not give other maintainers notice, everything that 
depends on ImageMagick is now likely broken in rawhide



Can we untag rawhide new ImageMagick, create side tag and move new
ImageMagick to side tag?

Regards,
Mamoru
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2014407] perl-Authen-Credential-1.2 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014407



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-23eee77bce has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2021-23eee77bce`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-23eee77bce

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014407
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Change: Ansible 5 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Ben Cotton]

The subject is wrong. This Change proposal is for Fedora Linux *36*. Whoops!

-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

F37 Change: Ansible 5 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Ben Cotton]

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ansible5

== Summary ==

The ansible project has re-organized how they release and distribute
ansible. This change moves Fedora to be in sync with those changes and
retires the old 'ansible classic/2.9.x' package in favor of a
'ansible' package that pulls in ansible-core (the engine) and includes
all the collections in upstream ansible releases.

== Owner ==

* Name: [[User:kevin| Kevin Fenzi]] and [[User:dmsimard]]
* Email: ke...@scrye.com, dmsim...@redhat.com


== Detailed Description ==
The upstream ansible project found that maintaining a single
monolithic ansible package with everything included was not working
well 
([https://www.ansible.com/blog/thoughts-on-restructuring-the-ansible-project
source]). Small changes had to wait for releases, some areas had no
subject matter reviewers, it was difficult to try and handle all the
issues and changes in a timely manner. So, the ansible engine was
split off and then the rest of the content was moved to separate
collections. These collections could then be maintained by communities
that care about that area and could release at their own pace. A
number of collections have agreed to release on the same cadence.
These collections, along with the ansible-core engine comprise a
upstream 'ansible' release.

The engine package (ansible-core) is already in Fedora 35+. Currently
the 'ansible' package is 'ansible classic', ie, the 2.9.x version from
before the reorganization. While Ansible 2.9.x will continue to be
maintained from a security perspective until 2022, it is desireable to
update to the latest release of both ansible-core and ansible in order
to benefit from continued updates, bug fixes and improvements.

This change will modify the existing 'ansible' package to include the
Ansible Collections that are provided in the upstream ansible releases
from PyPi. The ansible package will not include ansible-core but will
have a requirement (dependency) on it.

Having two separate packages will give users the ability to select the
best option based on their needs:

# Install the 'ansible' package to mirror the user experience when
installing ansible from PyPi: it will install ansible-core as well as
the collections as they are included in the upstream ansible release.
# Install just the 'ansible-core' package when no external collections
are necessary
# Install 'ansible-core' and then manually install collections either
from existing 
[https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?match=glob=package=ansible-collection*
packages in Fedora], from [https://galaxy.ansible.com/ Ansible Galaxy]
or elsewhere.


== Benefit to Fedora ==

* On current upstream releases with bugfixes and enhancements.
* Increases flexibility by allowing users to choose which Ansible
collections to install and where they install it from.
* More rapid improvements for Fedora users.

== Scope ==
* Proposal owners: 'ansible' package needs to be modified for this
change (work is in progress already).
* Other developers: N/A
* Release engineering: N/A
* Policies and guidelines: Possibly policies for packaging collections?
* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change
* Alignment with Objectives:

== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==

On upgrade, ansible-2.9.x will be replaced by ansible-core + release
collections. Ansible playbooks will continue to run as before.

== How To Test ==

Playbooks that run as expected under Ansible 2.9 may behave
differently under Ansible 5 which effectively updates the
(ansible-core) runtime from 2.9 to 2.12.

Users are encouraged to take a look at the available porting guides
for both Ansible and ansible-core
(https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/devel/porting_guides/porting_guides.html)
and carefully test the behavior of their roles and playbooks in case
of any adjustments are needed.

The Ansible community package follows semantic versioning rules, so
incompatible changes are only made between major versions.
Unfortunately in this case, there are a number of major versions
between 2.9 and 5.0.

== User Experience ==

Users can remove the release collections and install separately
packaged collections or install from ansible-galaxy.

== Dependencies ==

Might need to conflict with some seperately packaged collections.

== Contingency Plan ==

* Contingency mechanism: Keep shipping ansible classic, but it will go
EOL and updates will become much harder.

* Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System Wide Change)

* Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change)

== Documentation ==

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

== Release Notes ==

Ansible is now shipped as 'ansible-core' (the engine) and a curated
set of Ansible collections.
Users can use 'dnf install ansible' to install ansible-core as well as
the Ansible collections included in the upstream Ansible releases.
Users can also opt to 'dnf install ansible-core' and then install
collections manually from standalone packages or via ansible-galaxy.


-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His

F37 Change: Ansible 5 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Ben Cotton]

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ansible5

== Summary ==

The ansible project has re-organized how they release and distribute
ansible. This change moves Fedora to be in sync with those changes and
retires the old 'ansible classic/2.9.x' package in favor of a
'ansible' package that pulls in ansible-core (the engine) and includes
all the collections in upstream ansible releases.

== Owner ==

* Name: [[User:kevin| Kevin Fenzi]] and [[User:dmsimard]]
* Email: ke...@scrye.com, dmsim...@redhat.com


== Detailed Description ==
The upstream ansible project found that maintaining a single
monolithic ansible package with everything included was not working
well 
([https://www.ansible.com/blog/thoughts-on-restructuring-the-ansible-project
source]). Small changes had to wait for releases, some areas had no
subject matter reviewers, it was difficult to try and handle all the
issues and changes in a timely manner. So, the ansible engine was
split off and then the rest of the content was moved to separate
collections. These collections could then be maintained by communities
that care about that area and could release at their own pace. A
number of collections have agreed to release on the same cadence.
These collections, along with the ansible-core engine comprise a
upstream 'ansible' release.

The engine package (ansible-core) is already in Fedora 35+. Currently
the 'ansible' package is 'ansible classic', ie, the 2.9.x version from
before the reorganization. While Ansible 2.9.x will continue to be
maintained from a security perspective until 2022, it is desireable to
update to the latest release of both ansible-core and ansible in order
to benefit from continued updates, bug fixes and improvements.

This change will modify the existing 'ansible' package to include the
Ansible Collections that are provided in the upstream ansible releases
from PyPi. The ansible package will not include ansible-core but will
have a requirement (dependency) on it.

Having two separate packages will give users the ability to select the
best option based on their needs:

# Install the 'ansible' package to mirror the user experience when
installing ansible from PyPi: it will install ansible-core as well as
the collections as they are included in the upstream ansible release.
# Install just the 'ansible-core' package when no external collections
are necessary
# Install 'ansible-core' and then manually install collections either
from existing 
[https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?match=glob=package=ansible-collection*
packages in Fedora], from [https://galaxy.ansible.com/ Ansible Galaxy]
or elsewhere.


== Benefit to Fedora ==

* On current upstream releases with bugfixes and enhancements.
* Increases flexibility by allowing users to choose which Ansible
collections to install and where they install it from.
* More rapid improvements for Fedora users.

== Scope ==
* Proposal owners: 'ansible' package needs to be modified for this
change (work is in progress already).
* Other developers: N/A
* Release engineering: N/A
* Policies and guidelines: Possibly policies for packaging collections?
* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change
* Alignment with Objectives:

== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==

On upgrade, ansible-2.9.x will be replaced by ansible-core + release
collections. Ansible playbooks will continue to run as before.

== How To Test ==

Playbooks that run as expected under Ansible 2.9 may behave
differently under Ansible 5 which effectively updates the
(ansible-core) runtime from 2.9 to 2.12.

Users are encouraged to take a look at the available porting guides
for both Ansible and ansible-core
(https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/devel/porting_guides/porting_guides.html)
and carefully test the behavior of their roles and playbooks in case
of any adjustments are needed.

The Ansible community package follows semantic versioning rules, so
incompatible changes are only made between major versions.
Unfortunately in this case, there are a number of major versions
between 2.9 and 5.0.

== User Experience ==

Users can remove the release collections and install separately
packaged collections or install from ansible-galaxy.

== Dependencies ==

Might need to conflict with some seperately packaged collections.

== Contingency Plan ==

* Contingency mechanism: Keep shipping ansible classic, but it will go
EOL and updates will become much harder.

* Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System Wide Change)

* Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change)

== Documentation ==

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

== Release Notes ==

Ansible is now shipped as 'ansible-core' (the engine) and a curated
set of Ansible collections.
Users can use 'dnf install ansible' to install ansible-core as well as
the Ansible collections included in the upstream Ansible releases.
Users can also opt to 'dnf install ansible-core' and then install
collections manually from standalone packages or via ansible-galaxy.


-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His

FedoraRespin-34-updates-20211015.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 4/45 (x86_64)

ID: 1029889 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_fprint
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029889
ID: 1029900 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029900
ID: 1029903 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_printing
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029903
ID: 1029910 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029910

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/45 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

ID: 1029891 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gedit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029891

Passed openQA tests: 40/45 (x86_64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2014407] perl-Authen-Credential-1.2 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014407



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-71362580cb has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-71362580cb

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014407
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2014537] Please add perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword for EPEL 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014537

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-3e69333ed8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-3e69333ed8

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014537
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
  28  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f005e1b879   
debmirror-2.35-1.el7
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1c90472b95   
libopenmpt-0.5.12-1.el7
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a3fe2b021b   
python3-pillow-6.2.2-3.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

dehydrated-0.7.0-2.el7
oval-graph-1.3.2-1.el7
perl-Authen-Credential-1.2-1.el7

Details about builds:



 dehydrated-0.7.0-2.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-7b96722946)
 A client for signing certificates with an ACME server

Update Information:

Update trigger to proper version

ChangeLog:

* Tue Jun  1 2021 Paul Wouters  - 0.7.0-2
- Update trigger to proper version
* Tue Jun  1 2021 Paul Wouters  - 0.7.0-1
- Resolved: rhbz#1872621 [RFE] Ship systemd units for auto-renewal
- Resolved: rhbz#1906674 dehydrated-0.7.0 is available
* Tue Jan 26 2021 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.6.5-5
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild
* Mon Jul 27 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.6.5-4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue Jan 28 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.6.5-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
* Wed Jul 24 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.6.5-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1906674 - dehydrated-0.7.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906674




 oval-graph-1.3.2-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a3f2e5e2d1)
 Tool for visualization of SCAP rule evaluation results

Update Information:

1.3.2 (Jan Rodak)

ChangeLog:

* Fri Oct 15 2021 Packit Service  - 
1.3.2-1
- 1.3.2 (Jan Rodak)
- Create test for fix (Jan Rodak)
- Fix bugzilla 2011382 (Jan Rodak)

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2011382 - arf-to-graph, arf-to-json, json-to-graph | Help-sections 
refer to 'oval-graph' as main command
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011382




 perl-Authen-Credential-1.2-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-71362580cb)
 Abstraction of a credential

Update Information:

Updated to upstream version.

ChangeLog:

* Fri Oct 15 2021 Lionel Cons  1.2-1
- Updated to 1.2 (rhbz #2014407)
* Thu Jul 22 2021 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.1-19
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri May 21 2021 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.1-18
- Perl 5.34 rebuild
* Tue Jan 26 2021 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.1-17
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue Jul 28 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.1-16
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue Jun 23 2020 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.1-15
- Perl 5.32 rebuild
* Wed Jan 29 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.1-14
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri Jul 26 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.1-13
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri May 31 2019 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.1-12
- Perl 5.30 rebuild
* Fri Feb  1 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.1-11
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri Jul 13 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.1-10
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri Jun 29 2018 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.1-9
- Perl 5.28 rebuild
* Thu Feb  8 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.1-8
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild
* Thu Jul 27 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.1-7
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild
* Mon Jun  5 2017 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.1-6
- Perl 5.26 rebuild
* Sat Feb 11 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.1-5
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild
* Sun May 15 2016 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.1-4
- Perl 5.24 rebuild
* Thu Feb  

[Bug 2014407] perl-Authen-Credential-1.2 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014407



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1be219cb04 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1be219cb04

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014407
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-dd446b153c   
libopenmpt-0.5.12-1.el8


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing

dehydrated-0.7.0-2.el8
oval-graph-1.3.2-1.el8
packit-0.39.0-1.el8
perl-Authen-Credential-1.2-1.el8
perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword-0.05-17.el8
python-strictyaml-1.3.2-2.el8
targetd-0.10.0-3.el8

Details about builds:



 dehydrated-0.7.0-2.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f36817747d)
 A client for signing certificates with an ACME server

Update Information:

Update trigger to proper version

ChangeLog:

* Tue Jun  1 2021 Paul Wouters  - 0.7.0-2
- Update trigger to proper version
* Tue Jun  1 2021 Paul Wouters  - 0.7.0-1
- Resolved: rhbz#1872621 [RFE] Ship systemd units for auto-renewal
- Resolved: rhbz#1906674 dehydrated-0.7.0 is available
* Tue Jan 26 2021 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.6.5-5
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild
* Mon Jul 27 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.6.5-4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue Jan 28 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.6.5-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
* Wed Jul 24 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.6.5-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild




 oval-graph-1.3.2-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-852b8e4325)
 Tool for visualization of SCAP rule evaluation results

Update Information:

1.3.2 (Jan Rodak)

ChangeLog:

* Fri Oct 15 2021 Packit Service  - 
1.3.2-1
- 1.3.2 (Jan Rodak)
- Create test for fix (Jan Rodak)
- Fix bugzilla 2011382 (Jan Rodak)

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2011382 - arf-to-graph, arf-to-json, json-to-graph | Help-sections 
refer to 'oval-graph' as main command
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011382




 packit-0.39.0-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-b6752e788f)
 A tool for integrating upstream projects with Fedora operating system

Update Information:

New upstream release: 0.39.0

ChangeLog:

* Thu Oct 14 2021 Packit Service  - 
0.39.0-1
- Bug in Packit causing issues with local build when the branch was named with 
prefix rpm has been fixed. (#1380)
- We have added a new option to Packit CLI when creating Bodhi updates, you can 
use `-b` or `--resolve-bugzillas` and specify IDs (separated by comma, e.g. `-b 
1` or `-b 1,2,3`) of bugzillas that are being closed by the update. (#1383)

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1963155 - local_build of a git branch which starts with "rpm" 
fails: utils.py ERROR  RPM was created successfully, but can't be found
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963155




 perl-Authen-Credential-1.2-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1be219cb04)
 Abstraction of a credential

Update Information:

Updated to upstream version.

ChangeLog:

* Fri Oct 15 2021 Lionel Cons  1.2-1
- Updated to 1.2 (rhbz #2014407)
* Thu Jul 22 2021 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.1-19
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri May 21 2021 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.1-18
- Perl 5.34 rebuild
* Tue Jan 26 2021 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.1-17
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue Jul 28 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.1-16
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue Jun 23 2020 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.1-15
- Perl 5.32 rebuild
* Wed Jan 29 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.1-14
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild

[Bug 2014407] perl-Authen-Credential-1.2 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014407



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-06e158dc46 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2021-06e158dc46`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-06e158dc46

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014407
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2010107] Provide perl-Mail-RFC822-Address for EPEL-8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010107

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Mail-RFC822-Address-0.
   ||3-36.el8
Last Closed||2021-10-15 19:41:45



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-40073b9b66 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010107
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2011383] perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Fedora-0.4.4 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011383

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
   Fixed In Version|perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Fedora-0 |perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Fedora-0
   |.4.4-1.fc36 |.4.4-1.fc36
   ||perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Fedora-0
   ||.4.4-1.fc34
Last Closed||2021-10-15 19:22:06



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-c7e5fc5c72 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011383
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2014407] perl-Authen-Credential-1.2 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014407

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-55d8049933 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2021-55d8049933`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-55d8049933

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014407
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Self Introduction: Peter Kotvan

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

Hello, Peter!

On Friday, 15 October 2021 at 00:31, Peter Kotvan wrote:
[...]
> The main reason I'm writing this email is that I miss a retired package (
> scrot ) in Fedora and since I
> already have a copr repo with it I thought why not to go all the way and
> maintain it "officially". Maybe I could take on more packages in the
> future. :)

Welcome to Fedora! Maintaining a package you care about is one of the
best ways to contribute.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora   https://getfedora.org  |  RPM Fusion  http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Fedora Linux 35 Final blocker review summary

[Adam Williamson]

On Fri, 2021-10-15 at 14:04 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> Many fewer blockers than last week. Hooray! Go/No-Go for target date
> #1 is Thursday.
> 
> 
> Action summary
> 
> 
> Accepted blockers
> -
> 
> 3. plasma-discover — Discover shows a misleading state of Flatpak
> repos, can't delete disabled repos — NEW
> ACTION: Maintainers to fix issue
> 
> 4. plasma-discover — Discover doesn't seem to find any RPM packages,
> neither locally installed nor in RPM repos — NEW
> ACTION: Maintainers to fix issue
> 
> 5. plasma-discover — Toggling repo in Discover doesn't redraw the
> checkbox, confusing users — NEW
> ACTION: Maintainers to fix issue

So I'm pretty worried about these. I've spent the last two days trying
to fix 3 and 5 myself, but I'm just not a Qt C++ developer so it's
pretty tough sledding. I basically understand the problems in both
cases, but fixing them is more work. I have put detailed notes in the
upstream bug reports, and I'm happy to compare notes with anyone who
wants to try and help:

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443455
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406295

#4 is odd as it seems to behave differently for different people at
different times; we haven't figured out the condition that causes the
'bad' state yet.

Nobody else appears to be trying to help. I'm not confident we are
going to have these fixed in time.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Fedora Linux 35 Final blocker review summary

[Ben Cotton]

Many fewer blockers than last week. Hooray! Go/No-Go for target date
#1 is Thursday.


Action summary


Accepted blockers
-
1. geoclue2 — time is transiently incorrect when Automatic Time Zone
is enabled — MODIFIED
ACTION: QA to verify FEDORA-2021-14f2ed62fd

2. selinux-policy — The switch for Fedora Third Party repositories
does not switch them on. — MODIFIED
ACTION: QA to verify FEDORA-2021-d3cb1609c8

3. plasma-discover — Discover shows a misleading state of Flatpak
repos, can't delete disabled repos — NEW
ACTION: Maintainers to fix issue

4. plasma-discover — Discover doesn't seem to find any RPM packages,
neither locally installed nor in RPM repos — NEW
ACTION: Maintainers to fix issue

5. plasma-discover — Toggling repo in Discover doesn't redraw the
checkbox, confusing users — NEW
ACTION: Maintainers to fix issue

6. uboot-tools — RK3399 - SPL: failed to boot from all boot devices — POST
ACTION: Maintainers to submit an update with problematic patch reverted

Proposed blockers
-

1. kernel — Fedora 35 aarch64 cloud image based openstack VM hangs — NEW
ACTION: Maintainers to diagnose and fix issue

2. clevis-pin-tpm2 — clevis - thread 'main' panicked at 'called
`Option::unwrap() — ASSIGNED
ACTION: Maintainers to fix issue
NEEDINFO: pbrobinson

3. dracut — 5.14.9-200.fc34 kernel will not boot on AWS EC2 t2.small
instance — NEW
ACTION: Maintainers to submit an update that includes upstream fix

4. gnome-initial-setup — Online Accounts setup does not appear when
wifi is configured through Gnome Initial Setup — MODIFIED
ACTION: QA to verify FEDORA-2021-14f2ed62fd

5. kscreenlocker — KScreenLocker segfaults when screen dims — NEW
ACTION: Maintainers to fix issue

6. spin-kickstarts — resolv.conf on Cloud images are not empty,
causing cloud-init automatic network configuration to fail  — NEW
ACTION: QA to verify kickstarts commit 32b03e0

Bug-by-bug detail
=

Accepted blockers
-
1.  geoclue2 — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991075 — MODIFIED
time is transiently incorrect when Automatic Time Zone is enabled

The displayed time is incorrect in some cases when Automatic Time Zone
is enabled. Both `timedatectl` and the GNOME display show the wrong
time. Update FEDORA-2021-532f05d2e3 contained a partial fix.
Subsequent investigation discovered a change in NetworkManager 1.32
broke glib's network connectivity detection code, which broke geoclue.
Update FEDORA-2021-14f2ed62fd contains a candidate fix.

2. selinux-policy — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001837 — POST
The switch for Fedora Third Party repositories does not switch them on.

Enabling third party repos failed, which was sort of fixed in
gnome-initial-setup-41~rc-3.fc35. However, when running SELinux in
enforcing mode, it still fails. Several updates to the policy
configuration have been added. Update FEDORA-2021-d3cb1609c8 for
fedora-third-party removes an unneeded chcon call.

3. plasma-discover — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011291 — NEW
Discover shows a misleading state of Flatpak repos, can't delete disabled repos

4. plasma-discover — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011322 — NEW
Discover doesn't seem to find any RPM packages, neither locally
installed nor in RPM repos

Discover shows updates in the "Installed" tab, but when no updates are
available, only flatpaks are listed. This isn't universally
reproducible. Updated installations from Beta media seem to work, but
nightlies do not (as least as of 20211011.n.0.iso).

5. plasma-discover — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011333 — NEW
Toggling repo in Discover doesn't redraw the checkbox, confusing users

When clicking on the checkbox, repo enablement is toggled, but that is
not reflected in the UI. This could lead to users putting the repos in
an undesired state. This is not fixed in Discover 5.23.

6. uboot-tools — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014182 — POST
RK3399 - SPL: failed to boot from all boot devices

uboot-tools releases 2021.{07,10} do not boot on rk3399 devices.
pbrobinson identified the responsible patch and is testing reversion
on key devices.

Proposed blockers
-

1. kernel — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011928 — NEW
Fedora 35 aarch64 cloud image based openstack VM hangs

OpenStack aarch64 VMs hang on boot. With the same kernel, this does
not happen on F34 cloud images, so this may implicate the BTRFS
change.

2. clevis-pin-tpm2 —
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012758 — ASSIGNED
clevis - thread 'main' panicked at 'called `Option::unwrap()

A crash in clevis presents unlocking TPM2 storage, which is part of
the key IoT security functionality. QA tests are passing on F35 and
failing on Rawhide, however the user report came from F35.

3. dracut — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010058 — NEW
5.14.9-200.fc34 kernel will not boot on AWS EC2 t2.small instance

Fedora-35-20211015.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 6/141 (aarch64), 2/204 (x86_64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20211014.n.0):

ID: 1029362 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029362
ID: 1029503 Test: aarch64 universal install_software_raid@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029503
ID: 1029515 Test: aarch64 universal install_xfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029515
ID: 1029641 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029641

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-35-20211014.n.0):

ID: 1029298 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029298
ID: 1029344 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029344
ID: 1029501 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029501
ID: 1029601 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029601

Soft failed openQA tests: 4/204 (x86_64), 3/141 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-35-20211014.n.0):

ID: 1029318 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029318
ID: 1029399 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gedit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029399

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-35-20211014.n.0):

ID: 1029279 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gedit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029279
ID: 1029319 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso gedit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029319
ID: 1029328 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029328
ID: 1029395 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029395
ID: 1029412 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029412

Passed openQA tests: 198/204 (x86_64), 132/141 (aarch64)

New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-35-20211014.n.0):

ID: 1029296 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029296
ID: 1029427 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029427
ID: 1029460 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029460
ID: 1029491 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029491
ID: 1029502 Test: aarch64 universal install_blivet_lvmthin@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029502

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi: 
System load changed from 0.02 to 0.16
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1027871#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029202#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso 
install_default_upload: 
System load changed from 0.55 to 0.83
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1027933#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029263#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso 
install_default@uefi: 
Used swap changed from 6 MiB to 5 MiB
1 services(s) added since previous compose: geoclue.service
System load changed from 0.25 to 0.39
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1027931#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029276#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload: 
System load changed from 0.89 to 1.09
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1027958#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029289#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default@uefi: 
Used mem changed from 934 MiB to 818 MiB
Used swap changed from 5 MiB to 2 MiB
1 services(s) added since previous compose: fwupd.service
System load changed from 0.64 to 0.29
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1027975#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029307#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default_upload: 
Used swap changed from 5 MiB to 0 MiB
1 services(s) added since previous compose: fwupd.service
System load changed from 0.64 to 0.49
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1027977#downloads
Current test data: 

Fedora-IoT-35-20211015.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20211014.0):

ID: 1029617 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029617
ID: 1029623 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029623

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20211014.0):

ID: 1029627 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029627

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20211014.0):

ID: 1029607 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029607

Passed openQA tests: 13/15 (aarch64), 14/16 (x86_64)

New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-IoT-35-20211014.0):

ID: 1029625 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029625

Installed system changes in test aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default_upload@uefi: 
System load changed from 0.33 to 0.50
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028436#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029622#downloads
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

guava 31.0.1 update in rawhide

[Mikolaj Izdebski]

Hello,

In one week guava package will be updated from version 30.1 to version
31.0.1 in rawhide. The new version changes API/ABI, so an action may
be required to update packages that depend on guava.

Upstream release notes: https://github.com/google/guava/releases/tag/v31.0
Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=77257569
Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556627
Pull request: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/guava/pull-request/2

Packages that depend on guava:

auto
caffeine
clojure-maven-plugin
compile-command-annotations
google-guice
jackson-dataformats-text
libidn
maven-shade-plugin
plexus-containers
protobuf
xmvn

--
Mikolaj Izdebski
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: ImageMagick update

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 10:22:36 AM +0200, Remi Collet 
 wrote:

Sorry, but such update, with soname change is not acceptable in stable
branches.


Hi Luya,

Please note that soname changes are allowed in rawhide only after a 
one-week notice period. Since you did not give other maintainers 
notice, everything that depends on ImageMagick is now likely broken in 
rawhide


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Non-responsive packager: kasong

[Pierre-Yves Chibon]

Good Morning Everyone,

The packager listed here has been receiving a daily email asking them to
either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS
matches an existing bugzilla account.

Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Create_a_Bugzilla_Account


kasong has received daily emails since September 28th.

kasong is main admin of rpms/kdump-anaconda-addon
kasong has a bugzilla override on rpms/kdump-anaconda-addon
kasong is maintainer of rpms/kexec-tools
kasong is main admin of rpms/memstrack
kasong has a bugzilla override on rpms/memstrack
kasong is watching rpms/systemd


Does anyone know how to contact them?


Thanks,

Pierre
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Rawhide-20211015.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Xfce raw-xz armhfp

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required test results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** 
below

Failed openQA tests: 11/141 (aarch64), 3/206 (x86_64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211014.n.0):

ID: 1028889 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028889
ID: 1028912 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028912
ID: 1029033 Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029033
ID: 1029059 Test: aarch64 universal install_multi_empty@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029059
ID: 1029071 Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029071
ID: 1029140 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029140
ID: 1029141 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029141

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211014.n.0):

ID: 1028823 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028823
ID: 1028911 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028911
ID: 1028926 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gedit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028926
ID: 1028937 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_printing@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028937
ID: 1029028 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029028
ID: 1029037 Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029037
ID: 1029067 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029067

Soft failed openQA tests: 6/206 (x86_64), 1/141 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211014.n.0):

ID: 1028970 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028970
ID: 1029005 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029005

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211014.n.0):

ID: 1028804 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gedit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028804
ID: 1028843 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028843
ID: 1028844 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso gedit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028844
ID: 1028849 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028849
ID: 1028939 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028939

Passed openQA tests: 129/141 (aarch64), 197/206 (x86_64)

New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211014.n.0):

ID: 1028880 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_role_deploy_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028880
ID: 102 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/102
ID: 1028893 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso mediakit_repoclosure@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028893

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi: 
Used mem changed from 215 MiB to 242 MiB
System load changed from 0.03 to 0.14
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1027326#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028727#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default: 
System load changed from 0.15 to 0.36
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1027325#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028728#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi: 
System load changed from 0.24 to 0.11
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1027331#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028735#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Everything-boot-iso 
install_default@uefi: 
Used mem changed from 191 MiB to 213 MiB
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1027381#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028783#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default: 
Used mem changed from 179 MiB to 204 MiB
System load changed from 

Re: crypto-policies and a certain usage of SHA-1

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 10:10:38 AM +0200, Björn Persson 
 wrote:

My question is: Is it true that this usage of SHA-1 makes the TLS
session weak, so that it's correct to forbid it in the crypto policy?


Hm, I think Fedora's crypto policy should not be stricter than upstream 
Firefox. This should probably be allowed.


Enterprise distros are intentionally trying to be stricter and 
completely remove SHA-1, but Fedora is not an enterprise distro and 
breaking websites that work fine everywhere else is not OK for Fedora.


Or could it be that Qualys is right? Perhaps SHA-1 is fine for this 
use

case, even though it's too weak for other use cases, and the crypto
policy should allow it?


SHA-1 is blocked in certificate signatures because those can be 
attacked offline. Signatures in the TLS handshake are entirely 
different. I'm hardly an expert, but I think the attacker only has a 
few seconds to generate a hash collision before the user gives up and 
closes the browser tab. Spending several months trying to find a 
collision is not an option here. Am I wrong?


Michael

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2014537] Please add perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword for EPEL 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014537

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-3e69333ed8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-3e69333ed8


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014537
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: jq issue with integer handling logic

[Neal Gompa]

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 11:20 AM Davide Cavalca  wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 22:41 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > I've gone ahead and done it, it needs karma:
> >
> > * F35:
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ab44a1d0c9
> >
> > * F34:
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-cdc2cb4c5a
> >
> > * F33:
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f727442f9b
> >
>
> Thanks! These all look good to me.
>

The F35 one needs additional karma to queue for stable.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: jq issue with integer handling logic

[Davide Cavalca via devel]

On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 22:41 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> I've gone ahead and done it, it needs karma:
> 
> * F35:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ab44a1d0c9
>  
> * F34:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-cdc2cb4c5a
>  
> * F33:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f727442f9b
>  

Thanks! These all look good to me.

Cheers
Davide
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2014537] Please add perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword for EPEL 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014537

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman  ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/37247


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014537
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-IoT-36-20211015.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 4/15 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20211014.0):

ID: 1029558 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029558
ID: 1029570 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029570
ID: 1029576 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029576

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20211014.0):

ID: 1029548 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029548
ID: 1029564 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029564
ID: 1029568 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029568

Passed openQA tests: 14/16 (x86_64), 11/15 (aarch64)

Installed system changes in test aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default_upload@uefi: 
System load changed from 0.85 to 0.59
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028231#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1029563#downloads
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2014537] New: Please add perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword for EPEL 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014537

Bug ID: 2014537
   Summary: Please add perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword for EPEL 8
   Product: Fedora EPEL
   Version: epel8
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword
  Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
  Reporter: heinrich.mis...@univie.ac.at
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: emman...@seyman.fr, msu...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Please add for EPEL8: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014537
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora 35 compose report: 20211015.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-35-20211014.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20211015.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   3
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   21.77 MiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   -15.12 KiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  gnome-session-40.1.1-3.fc35
Old package:  gnome-session-40.1.1-2.fc35
Summary:  GNOME session manager
RPMs: gnome-session gnome-session-wayland-session gnome-session-xsession
Size: 1.94 MiB
Size change:  -16.77 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Oct 12 2021 Ray Strode  - 40.1.1-3
  - Install gnome-wayland session


Package:  gnome-shell-41.0-4.fc35
Old package:  gnome-shell-41.0-3.fc35
Summary:  Window management and application launching for GNOME
RPMs: gnome-shell
Size: 7.98 MiB
Size change:  561 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Oct 12 2021 Ray Strode  - 41.0-4
  - Fix StPasswordEntry crash
Resolves: #2009637


Package:  httpd-2.4.51-2.fc35
Old package:  httpd-2.4.49-1.fc35
Summary:  Apache HTTP Server
RPMs: httpd httpd-devel httpd-filesystem httpd-manual httpd-tools 
mod_ldap mod_lua mod_proxy_html mod_session mod_ssl
Size: 11.85 MiB
Size change:  1.10 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Sep 22 2021 Lubo?? Uhliarik  - 2.4.49-3
  - Rebuilt for CI testing

  * Tue Oct 05 2021 Lubo?? Uhliarik  - 2.4.50-1
  - new version 2.4.50

  * Thu Oct 07 2021 Patrick Uiterwijk  - 2.4.51-1
  - new version 2.4.51

  * Tue Oct 12 2021 Joe Orton  - 2.4.51-2
  - mod_ssl: updated patch for OpenSSL 3.0 compatibility (#2007178)
  - mod_deflate/core: add two brigade handling correctness fixes



= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-local-lib] PR #1: Tests

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-local-lib` that 
you are following:
``
Tests
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-local-lib/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: libcurl-minimal

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 12:47:44PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 16:49 +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > As I understand it, Zbyszek is now proposing to make changes to other 
> > packages 
> > and/or distribution metadata in order to make (lib)curl-minimal actually 
> > used 
> > on some Fedora installations by default.
> 
> This sounds interesting. For elfutils-debuginfod-client we really only
> support http(s):// and file:// so replacing our dependency from full
> libcurl to libcurl-minimal seems a good idea (assuming those 3
> protocols are in libcurl-minimal). Please let us know what we should
> do/test to see if this works as intended.

You should also probably do:
curl_easy_setopt(c, CURLOPT_PROTOCOLS, CURLPROTO_HTTPS|CURLPROTO_FILE)
(copied from https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/55b90ee00b).

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2014407] perl-Authen-Credential-1.2 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014407



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-23eee77bce has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-23eee77bce


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014407
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2014407] perl-Authen-Credential-1.2 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014407

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-55d8049933 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-55d8049933


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014407
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20211015.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211014.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211015.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images:  3
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   85
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   2.23 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   2.45 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker aarch64
Path: 
Container/aarch64/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20211015.n.0.aarch64.tar.xz
Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker armhfp
Path: 
Container/armhfp/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20211015.n.0.armhfp.tar.xz

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Design_suite live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Design_suite-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20211014.n.0.iso
Image: Mate live x86_64
Path: Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-MATE_Compiz-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20211014.n.0.iso
Image: Cinnamon live x86_64
Path: Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Cinnamon-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20211014.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  ImageMagick-1:6.9.12.25-1.fc36
Old package:  ImageMagick-1:6.9.11.27-8.fc36
Summary:  An X application for displaying and manipulating images
RPMs: ImageMagick ImageMagick-c++ ImageMagick-c++-devel 
ImageMagick-devel ImageMagick-djvu ImageMagick-doc ImageMagick-libs 
ImageMagick-perl
Size: 40.98 MiB
Size change:  110.64 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Oct 04 2021 Fedora Release Monitoring 
 - 1:6.9.12-25
  - Update to 6.9.12-25 (#1869912)
  - New url address
  - Use pkgconfig for depending packages


Package:  adobe-mappings-cmap-20190730-1.fc36
Old package:  adobe-mappings-cmap-20171205-11.fc35
Summary:  CMap resources for Adobe's character collections
RPMs: adobe-mappings-cmap adobe-mappings-cmap-deprecated 
adobe-mappings-cmap-devel
Size: 2.22 MiB
Size change:  259.81 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Oct 13 2021 Benjamin A. Beasley  - 20190730-1
  - Update to 20190730 (close RHBZ#2013684)


Package:  american-fuzzy-lop-3.14c-6.fc36
Old package:  american-fuzzy-lop-3.14c-5.fc36
Summary:  Practical, instrumentation-driven fuzzer for binary formats
RPMs: american-fuzzy-lop american-fuzzy-lop-clang
Size: 1.20 MiB
Size change:  -1.92 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Oct 12 2021 Tom Stellard  - 3.14c-6
  - Rebuild for llvm-13.0.0


Package:  ansible-collection-ansible-netcommon-2.2.0-2.fc36
Old package:  ansible-collection-ansible-netcommon-2.2.0-1.fc35
Summary:  Ansible Network Collection for Common Code
RPMs: ansible-collection-ansible-netcommon
Size: 180.66 KiB
Size change:  195 B
Changelog:
  * Wed Oct 13 2021 Sagi Shnaidman  - 2.2.0-2
  - Use ansible or ansible-core as BuildRequires


Package:  ansible-collection-ansible-posix-1.3.0-2.fc36
Old package:  ansible-collection-ansible-posix-1.3.0-1.fc36
Summary:  Ansible Collection targeting POSIX and POSIX-ish platforms
RPMs: ansible-collection-ansible-posix
Size: 120.57 KiB
Size change:  -757 B

Package:  ansible-collection-ansible-utils-2.3.0-3.fc36
Old package:  ansible-collection-ansible-utils-2.3.0-2.fc35
Summary:  Ansible Network Collection for Common Code
RPMs: ansible-collection-ansible-utils
Size: 89.87 KiB
Size change:  39 B
Changelog:
  * Thu Oct 14 2021 Sagi Shnaidman  - 2.3.0-3
  - Use ansible or ansible-core as BuildRequires


Package:  ansible-collection-containers-podman-1.6.1-3.fc36
Old package:  ansible-collection-containers-podman-1.6.1-2.fc35
Summary:  Podman Ansible collection for Podman containers
RPMs: ansible-collection-containers-podman
Size: 228.90 KiB
Size change:  144 B
Changelog:
  * Thu Oct 14 2021 Sagi Shnaidman  - 1.6.1-3
  - Use ansible or ansible-core as BuildRequires


Package:  awscli-1.20.62-1.fc36
Old package:  awscli-1.20.61-1.fc36
Summary:  Universal Command Line Environment for AWS
RPMs: awscli
Size: 2.11 MiB
Size change:  -11 B
Changelog:
  * Thu Oct 14 2021 Gwyn Ciesla  - 1.20.62-1
  - 1.20.62


Package:  bluez-5.62-1.fc36
Old package:  bluez-5.61-1.fc36
Summary:  Bluetooth utilities
RPMs: bluez bluez-cups bluez-deprecated bluez-hid2hci bluez-libs 
bluez-libs-devel bluez-mesh bluez-obexd
Size: 10.78 MiB
Size change:  93.43 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Oct 13 2021 Peter Robinson  - 5.62-1
  - Update to 5.62


Package:  castxml-0.4.3-7.fc36
Old package:  castxml-0.4.3-6.fc36
Summary:  C-family abstract syntax tree XML output tool
RPMs: castxml
Size: 4.66 MiB
Size change:  6.09 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Oct 07 2021 Tom Stellard  - 0.4.3-7
  - Rebuild for llvm-13.0.0


Package:  clang-13.0.0-3.fc36
Old package:  clang-13.0.0~rc1-1.fc35
Summary:  A C language family front-end for LLVM
RPMs: clang clang-analyzer clang-devel

Re: libcurl-minimal

[Kamil Dudka]

On Friday, October 15, 2021 12:47:44 PM CEST Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 16:49 +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> 
> > As I understand it, Zbyszek is now proposing to make changes to other
> > packages  and/or distribution metadata in order to make
> > (lib)curl-minimal actually used on some Fedora installations by default.
> 
> 
> This sounds interesting. For elfutils-debuginfod-client we really only
> support http(s):// and file:// so replacing our dependency from full
> libcurl to libcurl-minimal seems a good idea (assuming those 3
> protocols are in libcurl-minimal). Please let us know what we should
> do/test to see if this works as intended.

I think that no changes are needed in the elfutils-debuginfod-client package 
for now.  libcurl-minimal provides libcurl, so you should be able to simply 
swap the packages and use libcurl-minimal with elfutils-debuginfod-client:

# yum install --allowerasing libcurl-minimal

Actually, putting a strict requirement on libcurl-minimal to any package
would be counterproductive because it would prevent users from "upgrading"
to libcurl-full.

We would rather need it the other way around -- explicitly tag the packages 
that would *not* work properly with libcurl-minimal for some reason.

Kamil

> Thanks,
> 
> Mark

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL package and Java 11 requirement.

[Mikolaj Izdebski]

On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 10:41 AM Stefan Bluhm
 wrote:
>
> When opening a Buzilla, these common issues popped up:
>
> java-11-openjdk-headless RPM does not provide java-headless capability
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797054
> - "Hi. This is intentional. It will be added once jdk8 will stop to be the 
> system JDK."
>
> javapackages-tools: wrong generated Requires: `java-headless >= 11`
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993879
> - "The culprint *may* be xmvn, as there is (at least) one pkg in rhel8 which 
> is jdk11 based but is build by Makefile, and do not suffer the issue."
> - "A proper long-term fix would mean redesigning how provides and 
> auto-requires are supposed to work. There are several possibilities."
> - "Another possibility is removing auto-requires on java-headless altogether 
> - they add little value and cause much trouble."
>
> Is it possible to disable the auto-require generation in xmvn?
> Otherwise it seems I have to skip usage of xmvn just for that.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Stefan
>
>
> - Ursprüngliche Mail -
> Von: "fedoraproject org" 
> An: "epel-devel" 
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2021 09:05:13
> Betreff: [EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL package and Java 11 requirement.
>
> Hello Mike,
>
> I thought (!) I read somewhere that this difference between java-headless and 
> java-11-headless was intentional (or at least I understood it that way).
> Let me open a Bugzilla against Java 11.
>
>
>
> How did others tackle this issue in the past/currently though? I can't be the 
> first one creating an rpm with an autogenerated java-headless >= 1:9 tag.
>
> Is there a way to disable/remove this autogeneration or force it to be 
> something different?
> Also I noticed some packages where the headless tag was not generated at all. 
> So maybe I could just remove the trigger for that.

It is possible to filter generated requires.
This was described in a comment in one of the bugs you referred to:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993879#c10

--
Mikolaj Izdebski

>
> I tried removing maven-compiler-plugin from the pom and adding the 
> compiler.target=11 line in the build section but that gave the same result.
>
> Thanks and best wishes,
>
> Stefan
>
> - Ursprüngliche Mail -
> Von: "Mike Rochefort" 
> An: "epel-devel" 
> Gesendet: Montag, 4. Oktober 2021 22:57:09
> Betreff: [EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL package and Java 11 requirement.
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 3:50 PM Stefan Bluhm
>  wrote:
> >
> > it provides "java-11-headless". Not "java-headless". At least not on my 
> > machine
>
> Doing my own checks on CentOS Stream 8 and RHEL 8.4, this sounds like a Fedora
> change that didn't make its way back to RHEL. Worth opening a Bugzilla
> report on?
>
> For posterity, only java-1.8.0 returns when checking for java-headless
> on EL8 (latest
> versions on RHEL for 1.8 and 11 as of writing).
>
> $ rpm -qp --provides
> java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4.x86_64.rpm
> /usr/bin/jjs
> config(java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless) = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
> java-1.8.0-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
> java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
> java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless(x86-64) = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
> java-headless = 1:1.8.0
> java-openjdk-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
> jre-1.8.0-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
> jre-1.8.0-openjdk-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
> jre-headless = 1:1.8.0
> jre-openjdk-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
> libjava.so()(64bit)
> libjava.so(SUNWprivate_1.1)(64bit)
> libjsig.so()(64bit)
> libjvm.so()(64bit)
> libjvm.so(SUNWprivate_1.1)(64bit)
> libverify.so()(64bit)
> libverify.so(SUNWprivate_1.1)(64bit)
>
> $ rpm -qp --provides java-11-openjdk-headless-11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4.x86_64.rpm
> config(java-11-openjdk-headless) = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4
> java-11-headless = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4
> java-11-openjdk-headless = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4
> java-11-openjdk-headless(x86-64) = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4
> jre-11-headless = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4
> jre-11-openjdk-headless = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4
>
> --
> Mike
> ___
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> ___
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> 

Re: libcurl-minimal

[Mark Wielaard]

Hi,

On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 16:49 +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> As I understand it, Zbyszek is now proposing to make changes to other 
> packages 
> and/or distribution metadata in order to make (lib)curl-minimal actually used 
> on some Fedora installations by default.

This sounds interesting. For elfutils-debuginfod-client we really only
support http(s):// and file:// so replacing our dependency from full
libcurl to libcurl-minimal seems a good idea (assuming those 3
protocols are in libcurl-minimal). Please let us know what we should
do/test to see if this works as intended.

Thanks,

Mark
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: final link failed: memory exhausted on armv7l

[Iñaki Ucar]

On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 09:43, Iñaki Ucar  wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 06:15, Jeff Law  wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10/13/2021 10:37 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 13 2021 at 06:06:50 PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser
> > >  wrote:
> > >> What you describe as lto requires a lot of memory is caused by building
> > >> lto along with non-lto in the same object file requires significantly
> > >> more memory.  For that reason one can disable building non-lto along
> > >> with lto using the `-f-no-fat-lto-objects` compiler flags instead of
> > >> `-f-fat-lto-objects`, if and *only IF* the package in question does
> > >> *NOT* ship static libraries.
> > >
> > > More background: this default is, of course, backwards. Fedora
> > > packages do not generally ship static libraries, so it makes more
> > > sense for the few packages that do to opt-in instead of opt-out. Jeff
> > > proposed a change to improve that here:
> > >
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LTOBuildImprovements
> > >
> > > but he left Red Hat, so it hasn't been implemented.
> > I'd still like to tackle this but my time is limited.
> >
> > However, I strongly suspect fat-lto-objects is not the problem here.  If
> > the build is running out of memory at link time, that is the LTO phase.
> > The best solution for that is to either disable LTO on the arm target,
> > or (better) limit the parallelism at link time. There was a change to
> > redhat-rpm-config that I think made it into f35 to allow a package to
> > throttle the link-time parallelism.
>
> This makes sense, because f34 builds consistently succeed in exactly
> the same hardware. How do I limit just the link-time parallelism?

Could this be related to this [1] commit?

[1] 
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/c/bc8fa85e907d4b2b88760da8d23c9e17663c44fa?branch=rawhide

-- 
Iñaki Úcar
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2013643] perl-Net-STOMP-Client-2.5 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013643

lionel.c...@cern.ch changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013643
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: guava 31.0.1 update in rawhide

[Mat Booth]

On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 11:12, Mikolaj Izdebski  wrote:
>
> The new version changes API/ABI

Honestly it would be more noteworthy if guava did NOT break its API/ABI ;-)


-- 
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2014447] perl-Config-Validator-1.4 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014447

lionel.c...@cern.ch changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014447
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2013631] perl-Messaging-Message-1.7 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013631

lionel.c...@cern.ch changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013631
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2014446] perl-Config-Generator-1.1 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014446

lionel.c...@cern.ch changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014446
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2014407] perl-Authen-Credential-1.2 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014407

lionel.c...@cern.ch changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014407
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2014403] perl-No-Worries-1.7 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014403

lionel.c...@cern.ch changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014403
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2013637] perl-Directory-Queue-2.1 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013637

lionel.c...@cern.ch changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013637
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Cloud-34-20211015.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

ID: 1028639 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028639
ID: 1028647 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028647

Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2014447] New: perl-Config-Validator-1.4 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014447

Bug ID: 2014447
   Summary: perl-Config-Validator-1.4 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Config-Validator
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: lionel.c...@cern.ch
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: alexandre.be...@gmail.com, lionel.c...@cern.ch,
massimo.pala...@gmail.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 1.4
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.3-19.fc35
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Config-Validator/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/8031/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014447
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2014446] New: perl-Config-Generator-1.1 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014446

Bug ID: 2014446
   Summary: perl-Config-Generator-1.1 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Config-Generator
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: lionel.c...@cern.ch
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: ade...@gmail.com, alexandre.be...@gmail.com,
lionel.c...@cern.ch,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 1.1
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.0-16.fc35
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Config-Generator/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/8030/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014446
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: ImageMagick update

[Remi Collet]

Le 15/10/2021 à 10:22, Remi Collet a écrit :

This list is not complete, at least php-pecl-imagick is missing
and this one is broken by recent changes...



# dnf repoquery --whatrequires ImageMagick-libs

ImageMagick
R-magick
WINGs-libs
autotrace
chafa
converseen
digikam-libs
dmtx-utils
dvdauthor
eom
gtatool-imagemagick
inkscape
libopenshot
php-pecl-imagick
psiconv
pstoedit
q-magick
rss-glx
rubygem-rmagick
synfig
synfigstudio
vips
xine-lib-extras
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: ImageMagick update

[Remi Collet]

Le 15/10/2021 à 10:05, Luya Tshimbalanga a écrit :

Hello everyone,

ImageMagick is now pushed to 6.9.12.25 as a long-overdue update [1] for 
all releases except EPEL8 branch, which I do not use (co-maintainer 
welcome). Affected packages below may need to rebuild:


Sorry, but such update, with soname change is not acceptable in stable 
branches.


If really wanted, you have to create a grouped update for all packages


NsCDE
a2ps
anyremote
c-graph
caja-image-converter
chordpro-abc
conky-manager
darktable-tools-noise
devedeng
dvd-slideshow
epix
fbida
ffmulticonverter
freewrl
geeqie
gscan2pdf
gyazo
jumpnbump-menu
latex2rtf
libpst
lives
lyx
mediawiki
mtpaint
nautilus-image-converter
nemo-image-converter
perl-Graphics-TIFF-tests
perl-PDF-API2-tests
perl-PDF-Builder-tests
perl-Panotools-Script
playonlinux
rubygem-mini_magick
rubygem-rmagick
shutter
texlive-graphicxpsd
variety
vfrnav-utils
w3m-img
wdune


This list is not complete, at least php-pecl-imagick is missing
and this one is broken by recent changes...


Remi
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

crypto-policies and a certain usage of SHA-1

[Björn Persson]

Hello, I have a question for someone with deep knowledge about
cryptology. The question regards Fedora's crypto policies and a certain
usage of SHA-1 in TLS.

I encountered a web server that Seamonkey and Firefox refuse to talk
to. Both give me the error SSL_ERROR_UNSUPPORTED_SIGNATURE_ALGORITHM.

In an attempt to find out more, I checked the server with Qualys' SSL
Server Test (https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/). Qualys gave it an A+,
which is supposed to mean that its security is excellent.

Next I used Wireshark to inspect the TLS handshake. Wireshark reported
usage of SHA-1, not in the certificate but in a signature associated
with elliptic curve parameters:

| TLSv1.2 Record Layer: Handshake Protocol: Server Key Exchange
| Content Type: Handshake (22)
| Version: TLS 1.2 (0x0303)
| Length: 333
| Handshake Protocol: Server Key Exchange
| Handshake Type: Server Key Exchange (12)
| Length: 329
| EC Diffie-Hellman Server Params
| Curve Type: named_curve (0x03)
| Named Curve: secp256r1 (0x0017)
| Pubkey Length: 65
| Pubkey: 
041f840f40a2178f875274097092ca2549138f8a7bd52df895ea413b742d1714a6cf873e…
| Signature Algorithm: rsa_pkcs1_sha1 (0x0201)
| Signature Hash Algorithm Hash: SHA1 (2)
| Signature Hash Algorithm Signature: RSA (1)
| Signature Length: 256
| Signature: 
09147d81aa601dc402e62cf7f943196c89822a0c8bbe07d8443654519b0e04f51b0b8e72…

To check whether this was the problem, I temporarily added "SHA1" to
/etc/crypto-policies/back-ends/nss.config. This made the error go away,
and the browser happily loaded the page.

My question is: Is it true that this usage of SHA-1 makes the TLS
session weak, so that it's correct to forbid it in the crypto policy?
Or could it be that Qualys is right? Perhaps SHA-1 is fine for this use
case, even though it's too weak for other use cases, and the crypto
policy should allow it?

The website where I saw this is https://www.euroclear.com/ in case
anyone wants to test things themself.

Björn Persson


pgptX2bBu9PZE.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

ImageMagick update

[Luya Tshimbalanga]

Hello everyone,

ImageMagick is now pushed to 6.9.12.25 as a long-overdue update [1] for 
all releases except EPEL8 branch, which I do not use (co-maintainer 
welcome). Affected packages below may need to rebuild:


NsCDE
a2ps
anyremote
c-graph
caja-image-converter
chordpro-abc
conky-manager
darktable-tools-noise
devedeng
dvd-slideshow
epix
fbida
ffmulticonverter
freewrl
geeqie
gscan2pdf
gyazo
jumpnbump-menu
latex2rtf
libpst
lives
lyx
mediawiki
mtpaint
nautilus-image-converter
nemo-image-converter
perl-Graphics-TIFF-tests
perl-PDF-API2-tests
perl-PDF-Builder-tests
perl-Panotools-Script
playonlinux
rubygem-mini_magick
rubygem-rmagick
shutter
texlive-graphicxpsd
variety
vfrnav-utils
w3m-img
wdune


References:

--

[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=77256767

[2] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=ImageMagick

--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora Design Team
Fedora Design Suite maintainer
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Building docs of compiled extensions with new macros

[Miro Hrončok]

On 19. 08. 21 15:45, Miro Hrončok wrote:

On 19. 08. 21 10:25, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:

It seems that pip may be changing to in-tree builds?
https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/7555
Are we moving towards that as well? It seems like that would make it
simpler to build the docs for cases like this.


Eventually yes.


Coming to rawhide with pip 21.3:

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/DWQ32E5TULDKYOKB3UTJU76XDN7MWHAI/

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

HEADS UP: pip 21.3 does in-tree builds by default now, %{_pyproject_builddir}/ .pyproject-builddir will be empty

[Miro Hrončok]

Hello Pythonistas.

We are about to update pip in rawhide to 21.3. It does in-tree builds by 
default and hence if your package sues pyproject-rpm-macros, you won't find it 
the built stuff in %{_pyproject_builddir} anymore.


The following packages will need changes:

python-numcodecs.spec
72:PYTHONPATH=$(ls -d 
%{_pyproject_builddir}/pip-req-build-*/build/lib.%{python3_platform}-%{python3_version}) 
sphinx-build-3 docs html


python-pikepdf.spec
60:PYTHONPATH=$(ls -d 
%{_pyproject_builddir}/pip-req-build-*/build/lib.%{python3_platform}-%{python3_version}) 
sphinx-build-3 . ../html


python-matplotlib.spec
302:PYTHONPATH=$(ls -d 
%{_pyproject_builddir}/pip-req-build-*/build/lib.%{python3_platform}-%{python3_version}) 
\


rpm-specs/python-pydata-sphinx-theme.spec
81:PYTHONPATH=$(ls -1d $PWD/.pyproject-builddir/pip-req-build-*) make -C docs 
html

Note that %{_pyproject_builddir} was prefixed with underscore exactly for this 
reason (packages that use it might need changes).


With pip 21.3+, replacing %{_pyproject_builddir}/pip-req-build-*/build with 
${PWD}/build should do. However, that will loose compatibility with older pip.


We only plan to do this change in rawhide.

You can use this copr for testing:

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/pip-21.3/

(Pull Request integration is set, so if you send a PR to your pckage, you can 
observe the results in 
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/pip-21.3/builds/?dirname=pip-21.3:pr:


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2014407] New: perl-Authen-Credential-1.2 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014407

Bug ID: 2014407
   Summary: perl-Authen-Credential-1.2 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Authen-Credential
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: lionel.c...@cern.ch
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: lionel.c...@cern.ch, massimo.pala...@gmail.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
steve.tray...@cern.ch
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 1.2
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.1-19.fc35
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Authen-Credential/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/5855/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014407
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: final link failed: memory exhausted on armv7l

[Iñaki Ucar]

On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 06:15, Jeff Law  wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/13/2021 10:37 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 13 2021 at 06:06:50 PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser
> >  wrote:
> >> What you describe as lto requires a lot of memory is caused by building
> >> lto along with non-lto in the same object file requires significantly
> >> more memory.  For that reason one can disable building non-lto along
> >> with lto using the `-f-no-fat-lto-objects` compiler flags instead of
> >> `-f-fat-lto-objects`, if and *only IF* the package in question does
> >> *NOT* ship static libraries.
> >
> > More background: this default is, of course, backwards. Fedora
> > packages do not generally ship static libraries, so it makes more
> > sense for the few packages that do to opt-in instead of opt-out. Jeff
> > proposed a change to improve that here:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LTOBuildImprovements
> >
> > but he left Red Hat, so it hasn't been implemented.
> I'd still like to tackle this but my time is limited.
>
> However, I strongly suspect fat-lto-objects is not the problem here.  If
> the build is running out of memory at link time, that is the LTO phase.
> The best solution for that is to either disable LTO on the arm target,
> or (better) limit the parallelism at link time. There was a change to
> redhat-rpm-config that I think made it into f35 to allow a package to
> throttle the link-time parallelism.

This makes sense, because f34 builds consistently succeed in exactly
the same hardware. How do I limit just the link-time parallelism?

-- 
Iñaki Úcar
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Cloud-33-20211015.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211014.0):

ID: 1028568 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028568
ID: 1028576 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028576

Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Woah! [Thanks, Nest sponsors]

[Graham White]

Adding my thanks too, it's a great package of bits and bobs - the conference 
was pretty good too 

 - in case anybody does want to see 
https://twitter.com/graham_alton/status/1448564676162424832 

Mine arrived to the UK yesterday.

Regards and thanks again,

Graham


From: Luna Jernberg 
Sent: 14 October 2021 10:50
To: Development discussions related to Fedora ; 
riecat...@fedoraproject.org ; 
mat...@fedoraproject.org ; bcot...@redhat.com 
; Luna Jernberg ; Martin Jernberg 
; j...@almalinux.org ; 
davd...@amazon.com 
Subject: Re: Woah! [Thanks, Nest sponsors]

Got mine now, so a big thanks for me too :)

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 10:35 AM Luna Jernberg 
mailto:droidbit...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Mine is now on a Fedex truck from the airport here in Stockholm :)
So thanks Fedora and Red Hat :) looking forward to see what it all is, when i 
get it later today

On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 3:00 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 
mailto:domi...@greysector.net>> wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 October 2021 at 14:39, Stephen Snow wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-10-13 at 14:33 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:

[...]
> I got the email with tracking info two days prior to arrival of swag.
> but in between reg and ship, no communication.

Alright, I'll remain patient then. Thanks for sharing your story.

> > Nothing yet. :(
>
> Hope it arrives for you soon,

Thanks! I'll keep my fingers crossed. :)

Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora   https://getfedora.org  |  RPM Fusion  http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
___
devel mailing list -- 
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 
devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2014403] New: perl-No-Worries-1.7 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014403

Bug ID: 2014403
   Summary: perl-No-Worries-1.7 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-No-Worries
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: lionel.c...@cern.ch
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: lionel.c...@cern.ch, massimo.pala...@gmail.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 1.7
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.6-9.fc35
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/No-Worries/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/8034/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014403
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Package owner required for ImageMagick

[Peter Boy]

> Am 15.10.2021 um 06:17 schrieb Neal Gompa :
> 
> you'll probably want to look at is upgrading it to ImageMagick 7.x.
> ImageMagick 6.x is not maintained upstream as far as I can tell.

https://imagemagick.org/index.php: "We continue to maintain the legacy release 
of ImageMagick, version 6, at https://legacy.imagemagick.org.“ Last update of 
rpm files: 2021-10-10
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Fedora minimum hardware requirements

[Benson Muite]

On 10/15/21 5:13 AM, Michal Schorm wrote:

Thinking about this more, I always get to a question:
"Who are the consumers of that information and what do they actually
use it for?"

My personal idea is that the _ recommended _ requirements (of any OS)
are seeked by people that
1/ are going to install the system on some hardware on which that OS
wasn't previously present
2/ are looking up values with which they expect fluent, smooth,
experience both today and few year into the future
3/ _ want _ to install that OS, but have to purchase the HW yet, so
they are looking at recommendations on what HW to buy

The _ recommended _ HW requirements could be reviewed periodically
also based on the current market offering.
The market surely can differ through the world, as well as the average
purchase power.
However I wouldn't recommend anyone to e.g. go with less than 8GB of
RAM today, when considering what new HW to buy or what HW to use for a
setup intended to be used for years.
This is useful for development, however much RAM intensive work can be 
done on the cloud or in some institutional settings a shared high 
capacity local server. For most people, largest daily use would come 
from spreadsheets and internet browsing. Many programs are sufficient on 
4Gb of RAM, though many lightweight electron Javascript applications can 
slow performance compared to similar C/C++/GO alternative applications.

Perhaps, we - as a community - might be able to gather our
expectations and make some average for those values?


The _ minimal _ requirements on the other hand are IMO seeked by an
entirely different group of people that
1/ are looking up the minimal requirements on recent HW for e.g. IOT
edition, or other use-cases in which you need to get the most of a not
really powerful but recent HW
2/ are looking up whether some HW from a XYZ years or decades ago
could run the Fedora Linux

Main issue is hardware security.


I understand it may be hard to check whether the HW meets the pure
technical limitations.
Though if we know how to do that, we may automate that and prepare
some package, some script purely for the purpose of this check. We
would also need to think about where to put it - the server edition
maybe, or the net installer, or could we patch the GRUB2 itself with
it, providing a custom call which could be selected as a separate boot
entry in all the bootable media we provide ?


What do you folks think - does the idea of defining the values based
on the use cases of people that are _  actually likely to seek those
values _ make sense as I tried to explain it?
It may be better to ask people using/developing different spins what 
they find works for their spin. Bare OS is probably fine on 512MB - 1GB 
of RAM.  Applications and data used are more important - if you are 
building software locally, doing image processing, video editing, doing 
engineering simulation and design, doing communication, browsing the 
web, gaming, or office applications, your needs will be quite different. 
Possibly one can measure RAM use during CI tests for the applications.



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure