[Bug 2020636] perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.080 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020636 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|jples...@redhat.com,| |mspa...@redhat.com, | |ppi...@redhat.com | Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020636 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-33-20211108.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211107.0): ID: 1055780 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055780 ID: 1055781 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055781 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] Plan for EPEL-9
As both RHEL-9 Beta and CentOS 9 Stream are available, what are the plan for EPEL-9 ? I really this should be available ASAP to be available to our users at GA time. Regards, Remi ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Rawhide kernel crash
Thanks for your investigations. I will do like you , build a custom kernel. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2020884] perl-PDL-2.059 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020884 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-PDL-2.058 is available |perl-PDL-2.059 is available --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Latest upstream release: 2.059 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.57.0-1.fc36 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PDL/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3205/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020884 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fedora-Rawhide-20211104.n.0 compose check report
On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 15:24 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! > 24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing > openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** > below > > Failed openQA tests: 106/206 (x86_64), 62/141 (aarch64) > > New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211103.n.0): [snip] The large pile of new fail here is all due to a new bug where the kernel crashes as soon as we try to start up a graphics server in a VM with virtio graphics: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020438 I think I found an upstream report and patch, so I'm hoping Justin will be able to fix this soon. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: deltarpm usefulness?
On Saturday, November 6, 2021 11:15:00 PM CST Sumit Bhardwaj wrote: > It is not always about speed. There are still plenty of places in the world > where people are on limited data plans and to them using delta rpms makes a > lot of sense. They can work with slow speeds but not with high data > expenses. So i feel turning it on by default and having a setting to turn > it off is still a sane choice. Just my 2 cents. Having deltarpms turned on by default would seem to make the most sense in the IOT/Edge space, but in order to reap the most benefit these systems would have to download the deltas daily. -- Robby Callicotte He/Him/His TZ: America/Chicago IRC: c4t3l ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Rawhide kernel crash
On Sun, 07 Nov 2021 10:58:56 - "Leigh Scott" wrote: > I think I've found the cause after switching to lightdm. > [snip] > > I've found nothing provides /usr/lib64/dri/simpledrm_dri.so I don't have that file (on rawhide) and my system boots fine with my custom compiled 5.15.0-60.fc36.x86_64. I'm not sure if I actually have the simple framebuffer enabled. I thought I did, but I see there is a configuration option not set (again, I thought I set them all), so now I'm not sure. I followed the help advice in the menuconfig and left the other framebuffers I have used in the past enabled, so it could have done a failover to one of them. CONFIG_SYSFB_SIMPLEFB=y CONFIG_DRM_SIMPLEDRM=m # CONFIG_FB_SIMPLE is not set Even though this is not clear cut, maybe it will help you track your issue down. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: deltarpm usefulness?
On 11/7/21 01:14, Rajeesh K V wrote: Deltarpm did reduce a lot of update download size for many years since 2007 I remember seeing 60-70% reduction really often, and 90+ periodically. I've read Kevin's explanation of why it's not working as well now, but I wonder what changed between the early implementation when results were very good and now, when they really aren't. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
F35 mock w/ nosync broken?
I just upgraded to F35 and I'm trying to build a package via mock and I'm getting the following error: /usr/bin/python3: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.34' not found (required by /var/tmp/tmp.mock.lxb87ex8/lib64/nosync.so) Does it just need a rebuild or something? Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: deltarpm usefulness?
On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 00:16, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote: > > It is not always about speed. There are still plenty of places in the world > where people are on limited data plans and to them using delta rpms makes a > lot of sense. They can work with slow speeds but not with high data expenses. > So i feel turning it on by default and having a setting to turn it off is > still a sane choice. Just my 2 cents. > To me this entire conversation is a tradeoff argument Project issues 1. Having delta rpms allows for groups of people who could not work with Fedora to have some ability to do so on limited data lines. 2. Each broken delta causes frustration and various 'why does this tech suck' emails/irc pings/discussion threads which eats energy from volunteers. Infrastructure issues 1. The build infrastructure is a limited resource with limited disk space, cpu, and a goal of composing updated artifacts for consumption at least once a day. 2. Each delta takes disk space on our download and mirror system which is also a limited resource. Infrastructure can only do deltas between N package deltas 3. Each delta uses a large amount of compression which takes a long time/energy on the servers to generate. This slows down the ability to produce artifacts. Consumer issues 1. Each delta can save the consumer download times on their limited resource 2. Each delta uses a large amount of compression which means that applying on low power devices can be much slower than just downloading the entire package. 3. Because Fedora composes at least once a day, consumers require constant downloads to Fedora so that they can get 'working' deltas. Only download once a week, and find that the downloaded deltas aren't useful. Does having to download deltas every day outweigh the savings of the deltas? How does one measure that? How does one know what packages deltas make sense for and how many of them need to be generated? -- Stephen J Smoogen. Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: protobuf 3.19.0 update coming to rawhide
On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 09:38:00PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Adrian Reber wrote on 2021/11/07 7:25: > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 05:59:15PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > > > Just after the protobuf update to 3.18.1 last week finished protobuf > > > 3.19.0 was released and a request to update to that version was made. > > > > > > > All builds have finished and the side tag was merged. > > > > Although everything was built successful in COPR for the real rebuild > > two rebuilds failed: > > > * riemann-c-client (ppc64le only) > > Looks like parallel make issue, for now I disabled parallel make > and now build is successful: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1852908 Thanks for fixing this. Adrian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2020192] perl-DateTime-Tiny-1.07-12.fc36 FTBFS: Failed test '->locale ok' at t/02_main.t line 82.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020192 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|extras-orphan@fedoraproject |jples...@redhat.com |.org| CC||jples...@redhat.com Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-Tiny-1.07-13. ||fc36 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED Last Closed||2021-11-07 14:50:55 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020192 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Rawhide-20211107.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 111/206 (x86_64), 65/141 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211106.n.0): ID: 1055220 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055220 ID: 1055221 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_package_install_remove@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055221 ID: 1055228 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_update_cli@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055228 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211106.n.0): ID: 1055115 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055115 ID: 1055118 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055118 ID: 1055158 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055158 ID: 1055160 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso memory_check@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055160 ID: 1055161 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso anaconda_help URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055161 ID: 1055169 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055169 ID: 1055185 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso anaconda_help URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055185 ID: 1055187 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055187 ID: 1055207 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso anaconda_help URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055207 ID: 1055245 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055245 ID: 1055326 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055326 ID: 1055327 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055327 ID: 1055330 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055330 ID: 1055344 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055344 ID: 1055370 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055370 ID: 1055371 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055371 ID: 1055379 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055379 ID: 1055382 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055382 ID: 1055394 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055394 ID: 1055397 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055397 ID: 1055399 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055399 ID: 1055401 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055401 ID: 1055421 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055421 ID: 1055426 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055426 ID: 1055434 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055434 ID: 1055436 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055436 ID: 1055446 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055446 ID: 1055447 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055447 ID: 1055448 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055448 ID: 1055449 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055449 ID: 1055450 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055450 ID: 1055451 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055451 ID: 1055452 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055452 ID: 1055453 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055453 ID: 1055454 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata@uefi **GATING**
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20211107.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211106.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211107.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 133 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:165.84 KiB Size of upgraded packages: 4.01 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 26.25 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: python-graphene-sqlalchemy-2.3.0-4.fc35 Summary: Graphene SQLAlchemy integration RPMs:python3-graphene-sqlalchemy Size:87.61 KiB Package: python-graphql-server-3.0.0-12.b4.fc36 Summary: GraphQL Server tools for powering your server RPMs:python3-graphql-server python3-graphql-server+aiohttp python3-graphql-server+flask python3-graphql-server+webob Size:78.23 KiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: CuraEngine-1:4.11.0-4.fc36 Old package: CuraEngine-1:4.11.0-3.fc36 Summary: Engine for processing 3D models into G-code instructions for 3D printers RPMs: CuraEngine Size: 3.43 MiB Size change: -12.44 KiB Changelog: * Sat Nov 06 2021 Adrian Reber - 1:4.11.0-4 - Rebuilt for protobuf 3.19.0 Package: android-tools-1:31.0.2-3.fc36 Old package: android-tools-1:31.0.2-2.fc36 Summary: Android platform tools(adb, fastboot) RPMs: android-tools Size: 5.61 MiB Size change: -372 B Changelog: * Sat Nov 06 2021 Adrian Reber - 1:31.0.2-3 - Rebuilt for protobuf 3.19.0 Package: bear-3.0.16-2.fc36 Old package: bear-3.0.15-4.fc36 Summary: Tool that generates a compilation database for clang tooling RPMs: bear Size: 2.81 MiB Size change: -3.21 KiB Changelog: * Fri Nov 05 2021 Adrian Reber 3.0.15-5 - Rebuilt for protobuf 3.19.0 * Sat Nov 06 2021 Dan ??erm??k 3.0.15-6 - Enable unit tests & add optional test dependencies * Sat Nov 06 2021 Dan ??erm??k 3.0.16-1 - New upstream release 3.0.16, fixes rhbz#2007711 * Sat Nov 06 2021 Adrian Reber 3.0.16-2 - Rebuilt for protobuf 3.19.0 Package: bind-32:9.16.22-2.fc36 Old package: bind-32:9.16.22-1.fc36 Summary: The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) DNS (Domain Name System) server RPMs: bind bind-chroot bind-devel bind-dlz-filesystem bind-dlz-ldap bind-dlz-mysql bind-dlz-sqlite3 bind-dnssec-doc bind-dnssec-utils bind-doc bind-libs bind-license bind-pkcs11 bind-pkcs11-devel bind-pkcs11-libs bind-pkcs11-utils bind-utils python3-bind Size: 26.25 MiB Size change: -22.68 KiB Changelog: * Sat Nov 06 2021 Adrian Reber - 32:9.16.22-2 - Rebuilt for protobuf 3.19.0 Package: bloaty-1.1-12.fc36 Old package: bloaty-1.1-11.fc36 Summary: A size profiler for binaries RPMs: bloaty Size: 841.04 KiB Size change: -657 B Changelog: * Sun Nov 07 2021 Mamoru TASAKA - 1.1-12 - rebuild for new protobuf Package: clementine-1.4.0-7.rc1.20210104git479f1d4.fc36.5 Old package: clementine-1.4.0-7.rc1.20210104git479f1d4.fc36.4 Summary: A music player and library organizer RPMs: clementine Size: 24.45 MiB Size change: -14.07 KiB Changelog: * Sat Nov 06 2021 Adrian Reber - 1.4.0-7.rc1.20210104git479f1d4.5 - Rebuilt for protobuf 3.19.0 Package: cockatrice-2.8.0-4.fc36 Old package: cockatrice-2.8.0-3.fc36 Summary: A cross-platform virtual tabletop software for multi-player card games RPMs: cockatrice cockatrice-langpack-cs cockatrice-langpack-de cockatrice-langpack-en cockatrice-langpack-es cockatrice-langpack-et cockatrice-langpack-fr cockatrice-langpack-it cockatrice-langpack-ja cockatrice-langpack-ko cockatrice-langpack-nb cockatrice-langpack-nl cockatrice-langpack-pl cockatrice-langpack-pt cockatrice-langpack-pt_BR cockatrice-langpack-ru cockatrice-langpack-sr cockatrice-langpack-sv cockatrice-langpack-zh-Hans Size: 34.08 MiB Size change: -62.65 KiB Changelog: * Sat Nov 06 2021 Adrian Reber - 2.8.0-4 - Rebuilt for protobuf 3.19.0 Package: collectd-5.12.0-11.fc36 Old package: collectd-5.12.0-10.fc36 Summary: Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files RPMs: collectd collectd-amqp collectd-amqp1 collectd-apache collectd-ascent collectd-bind collectd-ceph collectd-chrony collectd-curl collectd-curl_json collectd-curl_xml collectd-dbi collectd-disk collectd-dns collectd-drbd collectd-email collectd-generic-jmx collectd-gps collectd-hugepages collectd-infiniband collectd-ipmi collectd-iptables collectd-ipvs collectd-java collectd-log_logstash collectd-lua collectd-mcelog collectd-mdevents collectd-memcachec collectd-modbus collectd-mysql collectd-netlink collectd-nginx collectd-notify_desktop collectd-notify_email collectd-nut collectd-onewire collectd-openldap collectd-ovs_events collectd-ovs_stats collectd-pinba collectd-
Re: protobuf 3.19.0 update coming to rawhide
Adrian Reber wrote on 2021/11/07 7:25: On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 05:59:15PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: Just after the protobuf update to 3.18.1 last week finished protobuf 3.19.0 was released and a request to update to that version was made. All builds have finished and the side tag was merged. Although everything was built successful in COPR for the real rebuild two rebuilds failed: * riemann-c-client (ppc64le only) Looks like parallel make issue, for now I disabled parallel make and now build is successful: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1852908 Regards, Mamoru ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
IQmol isn't compatible with openbabel3. Latest 2.15.0 release (compiled in Fedora) is missing in upstream's repository (but available for Windows/Mac, Linux abandoned?) On 11/6/21 14:01, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: side-tag: f36-build-side-47471 On 11/5/21 21:33, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 9:23 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: On 10/24/21 15:11, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Hello Antonio, On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:05 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: We are ready to push openbabel3 in Rawhide Will it be just Rawhide? Will you please let us know when the build is done in order to rebuild dependent packages? Within 24 hours i will create a side-tag in Rawhide. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2020194] perl-Date-Tiny-1.07-16.fc36 FTBFS: Failed test '->locale ok' at t/02_main.t line 65.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020194 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Date-Tiny-1.07-17.fc36 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2021-11-07 11:00:45 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Fixed in perl-Date-Tiny-1.07-17.fc36: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1853176 Note that Debian's perl team has submitted a pull-request upstream: https://github.com/dagolden/Date-Tiny/pull/1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020194 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Rawhide kernel crash
I think I've found the cause after switching to lightdm. X.Org X Server 1.20.11 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating System: 5.12.13-300.fc34.x86_64 Current Operating System: Linux localhost.localdomain 5.15.0-60.fc36.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Nov 1 15:11:25 UTC 2021 x86_64 Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=(hd3,gpt2)/vmlinuz-5.15.0-60.fc36.x86_64 root=UUID=fe89b9fa-7cee-40bd-912f-4caa21ccdda0 ro resume=UUID=3a00d179-9c86-43a0-87a2-fed4dad7cdb5 rhgb quiet rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau modprobe.blacklist=nouveau nvidia-drm.modeset=1 libahci.ignore_sss=1 plymouth.enable=0 selinux=0 Build Date: 23 July 2021 12:00:00AM Build ID: xorg-x11-server 1.20.11-2.fc35 Current version of pixman: 0.40.0 Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Sun Nov 7 10:37:03 2021 (==) Using config directory: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d" (==) Using system config directory "/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d" MESA-LOADER: failed to open simpledrm: /usr/lib64/dri/simpledrm_dri.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory (search paths /usr/lib64/dri, suffix _dri) failed to load driver: simpledrm (II) modeset(G0): Initializing kms color map for depth 24, 8 bpc. (EE) event2 - CYKB16 USB Keyboard: client bug: event processing lagging behind by 17ms, your system is too slow I've found nothing provides /usr/lib64/dri/simpledrm_dri.so ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2020898] perl-Moose-2.2201 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020898 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Moose-2.2201-1.fc36 Last Closed||2021-11-07 10:45:09 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1853162 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020898 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: protobuf 3.19.0 update coming to rawhide
Am Sonntag, dem 07.11.2021 um 16:48 +0900 schrieb Mamoru TASAKA: > Adrian Reber wrote on 2021/11/07 7:25: > > All builds have finished and the side tag was merged. > > > > Although everything was built successful in COPR for the real rebuild > > two rebuilds failed: > > > > * qgis > > This is recently upgraded grass 7.8.6 packaging mistake which causes > qgis to fail to detect grass, and grass modules not built, so %files in > qgis.spec complains about missng files, filed against grass: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020907 That has been fixed and the qgis build [1] should finish soon. Björn [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=78468505 > signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-35-20211107.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211106.0): ID: 1055076 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055076 ID: 1055077 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055077 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-34-20211107.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211106.0): ID: 1055092 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055092 ID: 1055093 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055093 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: deltarpm usefulness?
> > It is not always about speed. There are still plenty of places in the > > world where people are on limited data plans and to them using delta > > rpms makes a lot of sense. They can work with slow speeds but not with > > high data expenses. So i feel turning it on by default and having a > > setting to turn it off is still a sane choice. Just my 2 cents. > > Did you read the other replies? It doesn't save much and some have said > it causes even more downloading. And it's even worse if there's a long > time between updates, which is more likely for someone in that situation. The problem is with ‘discarding generated deltarpm data’ every day; please see earlier discussions where Kevin Fenzi et al. explains the **implementation/policy** issues, for instance at [1]. Deltarpm, if implemented to meet its original purpose, will be very useful to a lot of people. It might even be useful to all Fedora users in general as it should reduce network transfer overall. Deltarpm did reduce a lot of update download size for many years since 2007; it would be fantastic to fix the implementation shortcomings and maybe make it useful in other use cases (Edge/IoT) and prepare it for a better future? [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TCDRL4A57BXPBFA3YZ4S5BHJEMTVGNAD/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: protobuf 3.19.0 update coming to rawhide
Adrian Reber wrote on 2021/11/07 7:25: All builds have finished and the side tag was merged. Although everything was built successful in COPR for the real rebuild two rebuilds failed: * qgis This is recently upgraded grass 7.8.6 packaging mistake which causes qgis to fail to detect grass, and grass modules not built, so %files in qgis.spec complains about missng files, filed against grass: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020907 * riemann-c-client (ppc64le only) Not looked yet Adrian Regards, Mamoru ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-33-20211107.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211106.0): ID: 1055060 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055060 ID: 1055061 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055061 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Rawhide kernel crash
You are right. Thanks. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
