License change for poezio

2022-04-23 Thread Casper 
Hi,

Poezio's upstream has changed the license of poezio in the 0.14
version, from zlib to GPLv3+.

The change in the package is under the commit:

  
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/poezio/c/7bf30c4268f743389e523d91e9d42fe44ad9f65d?branch=rawhide

The package update (F36) is:

  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-16b9ac5491

Regards,
Casper
-- 
GnuPG: AE157E0B29F0BEF2 at keys.openpgp.org
CA Cert: https://dl.casperlefantom.net/pub/ssl/root.der
Jabber/XMPP Messaging: cas...@casperlefantom.net


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

License change: python-starlette is now “BSD and MIT”

2022-04-23 Thread Ben Beasley 
In release 0.19.1, python-starlette adds one Python module under the MIT 
license (bundling a subset of python-pep562, which I have handled 
according to the relevant guidelines).


The License field therefore changes from “BSD” to “BSD and MIT”.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Modello update in rawhide

2022-04-23 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel 
Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> Using side tags for single build updates is an overkill.

If the update includes ABI or even API breaks that may require rebuilding 
other packages, possibly even with patches, then it is NOT a "single build 
update".

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Modello update in rawhide

2022-04-23 Thread Fabio Valentini 
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 7:26 PM Mikolaj Izdebski  wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 9:32 AM Mattia Verga via devel
>  wrote:
> >
> > Il 22/04/22 19:14, Mikolaj Izdebski ha scritto:
> > > In one week modello package will be updated in rawhide (Fedora 37)
> > > from version 1.11 to version 2.0.0.
> > >
> > > Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053953
> > > PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/modello/pull-request/4
> > >
> > > The new major version introduces API break and packages may need to be
> > > ported to work with the new version.
> > >
> > > Packages that build-require modello and are possibly affected by this 
> > > update:
> > >
> > > antlr-maven-plugin
> > > maven
> > > maven-archetype
> > > maven-assembly-plugin
> > > maven-doxia
> > > maven-doxia-sitetools
> > > maven-file-management
> > > maven-invoker-plugin
> > > maven-plugin-tools
> > > maven-remote-resources-plugin
> > > maven-scm
> > > maven2
> > > plexus-sec-dispatcher
> > > xmvn
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mikolaj Izdebski
> >
> > Please build it in a side-tag, so that affected package maintainers can
> > try to rebuild their packages there and the final update can be delayed
> > until you're sure to not break anything.
>
> Using side tags for single build updates is an overkill. There are
> many different ways of testing packages, most of them don't involve
> using sidetags. But if anyone actually wants to test modello update in
> a sidetag, let me know and I will create one.

I think Mattia wanted to say that this should not be a single-build
update at all, given that it breaks API and probably requires changes
in dependent packages. Hence, the update + all required adaptations
should only be pushed together, as a single update.

Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Help with packaging golang binary: resolving dependencies

2022-04-23 Thread Mikel Olasagasti 
Hi Mark,

Hau idatzi du Mark E. Fuller (ful...@fedoraproject.org) erabiltzaileak
(2022 api. 23, lr. (20:06)):
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking to submit a first golang package for review, but I'm running
> into some confusion as to whether there's a way to download/import all
> the linked source dependencies without having to package all of those
> projects, too.
>
> To make this more concrete:
>
> My spec is at
> https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fuller/test-builds/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04306641-golang-github-task/task.spec
>
> There are three other sources on which it depends, none of which are
> already packaged for Fedora, so the build log
> (https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fuller/test-builds/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04306641-golang-github-task/builder-live.log.gz)
> shows:
>
> No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/go-task/slim-sprig)'
> No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/mattn/go-zglob)'
> No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/radovskyb/watcher)'
> Not all dependencies satisfied
> Error: Some packages could not be found.
>
> Copr build error: Build failed
>
>
> I tried also explicitly adding the other repos as sources, but this
> didn't seem to fix the problem either, i.e.:
>
> ...
> Source0:%{gosource}
> Source1:https://github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/archive/master.tar.gz
> Source2:
> https://github.com/radovskyb/watcher/archive/refs/tags/v1.0.7.tar.gz
> Source3:https://github.com/mattn/go-zglob/archive/master.tar.gz
> ...

You need to create a package for each of the dependencies first and
you need to submit them first for review. The Source method you're
trying to use won't work.

You can use `go2rpm -r $name` to create the specs for each of the
packages easily and adapt in case of need.

As you're using copr, create a package for each dependency and you
should be able to build the final package once everything is ready.

Kind regards,
Mikel
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2078127] New: Please build csv for EPEL8

2022-04-23 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078127

Bug ID: 2078127
   Summary: Please build csv for EPEL8
   Product: Fedora EPEL
   Version: epel8
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-App-CSV
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: stefano.biagio...@gtn.it
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, m...@fale.io,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



The package is already included in EPEL7.
https://download-ib01.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/x86_64/Packages/c/csv-0.08-5.el7.noarch.rpm

Thanks.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078127
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2022-04-23 Thread updates 
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   3  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e7404b9cd7   
zchunk-1.2.2-1.el7
   3  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1e126c870e   
stb-0-0.8.20211022gitaf1a5bc.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

python-bloom-0.11.1-1.el7

Details about builds:



 python-bloom-0.11.1-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2dbb87348b)
 Bloom is a release automation tool

Update Information:

Update to `bloom` 0.11.1

ChangeLog:

* Thu Apr 21 2022 Scott K Logan  - 0.11.1-1
- Update to 0.11.1 (rhbz#2077274)

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2077274 - python-bloom-0.11.1 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077274


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: "Conditional recommends" for packages

2022-04-23 Thread Marcin Zajączkowski 
On 2022-04-23 21:06, Igor Raits wrote:
> Or exactly opposite:
> 
> Supplements: (NetworkManager-sstp and gnome-shell)
> 
> … from within NetworkManager-sstp-gnome subpackage

Thanks Igor, that could be also an option, especially for the
independent 3rd party extensions. Good to know.

However, in my case all the three packages have the same (upstream)
author and the same packager, so forward hint in sstp-client is not a
problem and seems more natural.


Marcin


> 
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 8:51 PM Neal Gompa  wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 2:32 PM Marcin Zajączkowski  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi. My package sstp-client (a SSTP VPN client) can be used on it's own,
>>> but usually it is recommended to have also the NetworkManager-sstp
>>> plugin. "Recommends" seems to be a good idea here as NM is usually
>>> available by default.
>>>
>>> However, there is also NetworkManager-sstp-gnome which adds an applet
>>> for Gnome Shell. I'm reluctant to use "Recommends" here, as it would
>>> propose an user to install the whole GNOME ecosystem (assuming LXQT or
>>> something else it already used instead).
>>>
>>> Is there a way to use "conditional recommends" to only propose
>>> NetworkManager-sstp-gnome (e.g. when NetworkManager-sstp itself is
>>> installed) if gnome-shell is already installed?
>>>
>>
>> Recommends: (NetworkManager-sstp-gnome if (NetworkManager-sstp and 
>> gnome-shell))
>>


-- 
https://blog.solidsoft.pl/ - Working code is not enough
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: "Conditional recommends" for packages

2022-04-23 Thread Marcin Zajączkowski 
On 2022-04-23 20:40, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 2:32 PM Marcin Zajączkowski  wrote:
>>
>> Hi. My package sstp-client (a SSTP VPN client) can be used on it's own,
>> but usually it is recommended to have also the NetworkManager-sstp
>> plugin. "Recommends" seems to be a good idea here as NM is usually
>> available by default.
>>
>> However, there is also NetworkManager-sstp-gnome which adds an applet
>> for Gnome Shell. I'm reluctant to use "Recommends" here, as it would
>> propose an user to install the whole GNOME ecosystem (assuming LXQT or
>> something else it already used instead).
>>
>> Is there a way to use "conditional recommends" to only propose
>> NetworkManager-sstp-gnome (e.g. when NetworkManager-sstp itself is
>> installed) if gnome-shell is already installed?
>>
> 
> Recommends: (NetworkManager-sstp-gnome if (NetworkManager-sstp and 
> gnome-shell))

That's exactly what I wanted! Big thanks!

Sadly, I wasn't able to find it before in the documentation. I will have
to check how to contribute to:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/WeakDependencies/#_weak_dependencies


Marcin

-- 
https://blog.solidsoft.pl/ - Working code is not enough
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: "Conditional recommends" for packages

2022-04-23 Thread Igor Raits 
Or exactly opposite:

Supplements: (NetworkManager-sstp and gnome-shell)

… from within NetworkManager-sstp-gnome subpackage

On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 8:51 PM Neal Gompa  wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 2:32 PM Marcin Zajączkowski  wrote:
> >
> > Hi. My package sstp-client (a SSTP VPN client) can be used on it's own,
> > but usually it is recommended to have also the NetworkManager-sstp
> > plugin. "Recommends" seems to be a good idea here as NM is usually
> > available by default.
> >
> > However, there is also NetworkManager-sstp-gnome which adds an applet
> > for Gnome Shell. I'm reluctant to use "Recommends" here, as it would
> > propose an user to install the whole GNOME ecosystem (assuming LXQT or
> > something else it already used instead).
> >
> > Is there a way to use "conditional recommends" to only propose
> > NetworkManager-sstp-gnome (e.g. when NetworkManager-sstp itself is
> > installed) if gnome-shell is already installed?
> >
>
> Recommends: (NetworkManager-sstp-gnome if (NetworkManager-sstp and 
> gnome-shell))
>
>
>
>
> --
> 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure



-- 
— Igor Raits.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: "Conditional recommends" for packages

2022-04-23 Thread Neal Gompa 
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 2:32 PM Marcin Zajączkowski  wrote:
>
> Hi. My package sstp-client (a SSTP VPN client) can be used on it's own,
> but usually it is recommended to have also the NetworkManager-sstp
> plugin. "Recommends" seems to be a good idea here as NM is usually
> available by default.
>
> However, there is also NetworkManager-sstp-gnome which adds an applet
> for Gnome Shell. I'm reluctant to use "Recommends" here, as it would
> propose an user to install the whole GNOME ecosystem (assuming LXQT or
> something else it already used instead).
>
> Is there a way to use "conditional recommends" to only propose
> NetworkManager-sstp-gnome (e.g. when NetworkManager-sstp itself is
> installed) if gnome-shell is already installed?
>

Recommends: (NetworkManager-sstp-gnome if (NetworkManager-sstp and gnome-shell))




--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

"Conditional recommends" for packages

2022-04-23 Thread Marcin Zajączkowski 
Hi. My package sstp-client (a SSTP VPN client) can be used on it's own,
but usually it is recommended to have also the NetworkManager-sstp
plugin. "Recommends" seems to be a good idea here as NM is usually
available by default.

However, there is also NetworkManager-sstp-gnome which adds an applet
for Gnome Shell. I'm reluctant to use "Recommends" here, as it would
propose an user to install the whole GNOME ecosystem (assuming LXQT or
something else it already used instead).

Is there a way to use "conditional recommends" to only propose
NetworkManager-sstp-gnome (e.g. when NetworkManager-sstp itself is
installed) if gnome-shell is already installed?

Marcin

-- 
https://blog.solidsoft.pl/ - Working code is not enough
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2078112] New: perl-DateTime-Locale-1.35 is available

2022-04-23 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078112

Bug ID: 2078112
   Summary: perl-DateTime-Locale-1.35 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-DateTime-Locale
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: iarn...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 1.35
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.34-1.fc37
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Locale/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/6477/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078112
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Help with packaging golang binary: resolving dependencies

2022-04-23 Thread Mark E. Fuller 

Hi all,

I'm looking to submit a first golang package for review, but I'm running 
into some confusion as to whether there's a way to download/import all 
the linked source dependencies without having to package all of those 
projects, too.


To make this more concrete:

My spec is at 
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fuller/test-builds/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04306641-golang-github-task/task.spec


There are three other sources on which it depends, none of which are 
already packaged for Fedora, so the build log 
(https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fuller/test-builds/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04306641-golang-github-task/builder-live.log.gz) 
shows:


No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/go-task/slim-sprig)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/mattn/go-zglob)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/radovskyb/watcher)'
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.

Copr build error: Build failed


I tried also explicitly adding the other repos as sources, but this 
didn't seem to fix the problem either, i.e.:


...
Source0:%{gosource}
Source1:https://github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/archive/master.tar.gz
Source2: 
https://github.com/radovskyb/watcher/archive/refs/tags/v1.0.7.tar.gz

Source3:https://github.com/mattn/go-zglob/archive/master.tar.gz
...

Any help is very appreciated,

Regards,

--
Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.
ful...@fedoraproject.org
ful...@stossrohr.net
@fuller:one.ems.host
https://www.stossrohr.net
PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Rawhide-20220423.n.0 compose check report

2022-04-23 Thread Fedora compose checker 
Missing expected images:

Minimal raw-xz armhfp

Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed

Failed openQA tests: 9/231 (x86_64), 28/161 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220422.n.0):

ID: 1236814 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 
base_service_manipulation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236814
ID: 1236840 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_role_deploy_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236840
ID: 1236867 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236867
ID: 1236875 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236875
ID: 1237042 Test: aarch64 universal install_xfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237042
ID: 1237051 Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237051
ID: 1237058 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237058
ID: 1237069 Test: aarch64 universal install_blivet_btrfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237069
ID: 1237071 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237071
ID: 1237475 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gnome_text_editor@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237475
ID: 1237489 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237489

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220422.n.0):

ID: 1236734 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236734
ID: 1236755 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236755
ID: 1236763 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236763
ID: 1236790 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236790
ID: 1236793 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236793
ID: 1236832 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236832
ID: 1236834 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236834
ID: 1236843 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236843
ID: 1236860 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236860
ID: 1236871 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236871
ID: 1236927 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236927
ID: 1236932 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_fprint
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236932
ID: 1236937 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade upgrade_desktop_64bit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236937
ID: 1237038 Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237038
ID: 1237044 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237044
ID: 1237054 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237054
ID: 1237056 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237056
ID: 1237061 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237061
ID: 1237067 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237067
ID: 1237080 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237080
ID: 1237471 Test: x86_64 universal install_serial_console
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237471
ID: 1237494 Test: aarch64 universal install_pxeboot@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237494
ID: 1237496 Test: aarch64 universal install_iscsi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237496
ID: 1237498 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_repository_hd_variation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237498
ID: 1237499 Test: aarch64 universal install_serial_console@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237499
ID: 1237509 Test: aarch64 universal install_rescue_encrypted@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237509

Soft failed openQA tests: 2/161 (aarch64), 11/231 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft

Fedora-36-20220423.n.0 compose check report

2022-04-23 Thread Fedora compose checker 
No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 5/161 (aarch64), 5/229 (x86_64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220422.n.0):

ID: 1237249 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_freeipa_replication_master@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237249
ID: 1237338 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_printing_builtin@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237338
ID: 1237436 Test: aarch64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237436
ID: 1237539 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237539

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-36-20220422.n.0):

ID: 1237147 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237147
ID: 1237182 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237182
ID: 1237281 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gnome_text_editor@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237281
ID: 1237317 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237317
ID: 1237336 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237336
ID: 1237538 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237538

Soft failed openQA tests: 16/229 (x86_64), 10/161 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-36-20220422.n.0):

ID: 1237150 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237150
ID: 1237154 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237154
ID: 1237165 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso eog
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237165
ID: 1237175 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237175
ID: 1237197 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237197
ID: 1237199 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237199
ID: 1237200 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237200
ID: 1237206 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237206
ID: 1237295 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237295
ID: 1237296 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz eog@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237296
ID: 1237300 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237300
ID: 1237305 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237305
ID: 1237308 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237308
ID: 1237327 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade upgrade_desktop_64bit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237327
ID: 1237330 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_browser@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237330
ID: 1237343 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade eog@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237343
ID: 1237365 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237365
ID: 1237389 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237389
ID: 1237390 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237390
ID: 1237392 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237392
ID: 1237416 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237416
ID: 1237433 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_64bit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237433
ID: 1237434 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237434
ID: 1237444 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237444
ID: 1237451 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237451
ID: 1237537 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso eog
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237537

Passed openQA tests: 146/161 (aarch64), 208/229 (x86_64)

New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-36-20220422.n.0):

ID: 1237257 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1237257
ID: 1237258 Test:

Re: Modello update in rawhide

2022-04-23 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski 
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 9:32 AM Mattia Verga via devel
 wrote:
>
> Il 22/04/22 19:14, Mikolaj Izdebski ha scritto:
> > In one week modello package will be updated in rawhide (Fedora 37)
> > from version 1.11 to version 2.0.0.
> >
> > Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053953
> > PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/modello/pull-request/4
> >
> > The new major version introduces API break and packages may need to be
> > ported to work with the new version.
> >
> > Packages that build-require modello and are possibly affected by this 
> > update:
> >
> > antlr-maven-plugin
> > maven
> > maven-archetype
> > maven-assembly-plugin
> > maven-doxia
> > maven-doxia-sitetools
> > maven-file-management
> > maven-invoker-plugin
> > maven-plugin-tools
> > maven-remote-resources-plugin
> > maven-scm
> > maven2
> > plexus-sec-dispatcher
> > xmvn
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mikolaj Izdebski
>
> Please build it in a side-tag, so that affected package maintainers can
> try to rebuild their packages there and the final update can be delayed
> until you're sure to not break anything.

Using side tags for single build updates is an overkill. There are
many different ways of testing packages, most of them don't involve
using sidetags. But if anyone actually wants to test modello update in
a sidetag, let me know and I will create one.

>
> Mattia
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2076017] perl-Net-GitHub-1.03 is available

2022-04-23 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076017

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-9087dbd41c has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-9087dbd41c`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-9087dbd41c

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076017
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Fedora Contributor Tee Shirt Giveaway

2022-04-23 Thread Marcin Zajączkowski 
On 2022-04-22 20:52, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 3:45 AM Vipul Siddharth
>  wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 12:49 PM Leigh Scott  wrote:
>>>
>>> Why post something that has expired?
>> Hi leigh, When I shared the email, the giveaway was still active :)
>> given it was just for 24 hours, It had to expire after some time (This
>> is mentioned in the blog)
>> I definitely could have highlighted in the email as well!
>> Hope it was useful to some
> 
> 
> I tried it 15 hours after the email was posted, and it was already expired.

I had a similar behavior. Maybe the limit of items were reached before
that time.


Marcin

-- 
https://blog.solidsoft.pl/ - Working code is not enough
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2075768] selecting the 'Component' at the end, cleares the 'Description'

2022-04-23 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075768



--- Comment #2 from cornel panceac  ---
Then maybe the easy thing to do is prevent completing Description before a
valid component is selected?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075768
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220423.n.0 changes

2022-04-23 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report 
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220422.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220423.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  3
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages:   32
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  326.24 KiB
Size of dropped packages:14.75 KiB
Size of upgraded packages:   1.39 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   38.90 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: python-google-cloud-common-1.0.1-2.fc37
Summary: Python Client for Google Cloud Common
RPMs:python3-google-cloud-common
Size:26.40 KiB

Package: python-hatch-vcs-0.2.0-1.fc37
Summary: Hatch plugin for versioning with your preferred VCS
RPMs:python3-hatch-vcs
Size:16.58 KiB

Package: rubygem-scanf-1.0.0-1.fc37
Summary: A Ruby implementation of the C function scanf(3)
RPMs:rubygem-scanf rubygem-scanf-doc
Size:283.27 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: python-ots-8.2.1-3.fc37
Summary: Python wrapper for the OpenType Sanitizer
RPMs:python3-ots
Size:14.75 KiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  NetworkManager-sstp-1:1.3.0-2.fc37
Old package:  NetworkManager-sstp-1:1.3.0-1.fc37
Summary:  NetworkManager VPN plugin for SSTP
RPMs: NetworkManager-sstp NetworkManager-sstp-gnome
Size: 927.97 KiB
Size change:  4.19 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Apr 22 2022 Marcin Zajaczkowski  - 1:1.3.0-2
  - Switch build/install to macros
  - Mention upstream changes for 1.3.0 ?
  - Fixes for IPv6 handling
  - Support for EAP authentication
- EAP-MSCHAPv2 is now supported in pppd >= 2.4.9
- EAP-TLS is supported in pppd 2.4.9, but patches for MPPE keys may be 
needed
  - Added support to configure TLS authentication
  - Improved support for handling of MPPE during authentication.
  - New Translation updates supported by the Gnome community
  - Added support for GTK4
  - Lots of bug fixes


Package:  autowrap-0.22.8-1.fc37
Old package:  autowrap-0.22.7-1.fc36
Summary:  Generates Python Extension modules from [Cython] PXD files
RPMs: python3-autowrap
Size: 100.07 KiB
Size change:  1.87 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Apr 22 2022 Antonio Trande  - 0.22.8-1
  - Release 0.22.8


Package:  awscli-1.22.101-1.fc37
Old package:  awscli-1.22.100-1.fc37
Summary:  Universal Command Line Environment for AWS
RPMs: awscli
Size: 2.17 MiB
Size change:  -3 B
Changelog:
  * Fri Apr 22 2022 Gwyn Ciesla  - 1.22.101-1
  - 1.22.101


Package:  babel-2.10.1-1.fc37
Old package:  babel-2.9.1-5.fc36
Summary:  Tools for internationalizing Python applications
RPMs: babel babel-doc python3-babel
Size: 6.62 MiB
Size change:  524.40 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Apr 22 2022 Felix Schwarz  - 2.10.1-1
  - update to 2.10.1


Package:  dummy-test-package-gloster-0-8257.fc37
Old package:  dummy-test-package-gloster-0-8249.fc37
Summary:  Dummy Test Package called Gloster
RPMs: dummy-test-package-gloster
Size: 483.79 KiB
Size change:  -123 B
Changelog:
  * Fri Apr 22 2022 packagerbot  - 0-8250
  - rebuilt

  * Fri Apr 22 2022 packagerbot  - 0-8251
  - rebuilt

  * Fri Apr 22 2022 packagerbot  - 0-8252
  - rebuilt

  * Fri Apr 22 2022 packagerbot  - 0-8253
  - rebuilt

  * Sat Apr 23 2022 packagerbot  - 0-8254
  - rebuilt

  * Sat Apr 23 2022 packagerbot  - 0-8255
  - rebuilt

  * Sat Apr 23 2022 packagerbot  - 0-8256
  - rebuilt

  * Sat Apr 23 2022 packagerbot  - 0-8257
  - rebuilt


Package:  elementary-planner-1:3.0.7-1.fc37
Old package:  elementary-planner-1:2.7-2.fc35
Summary:  Task manager with Todoist support designed for GNU/Linux
RPMs: elementary-planner
Dropped RPMs: elementary-planner-devel
Size: 2.95 MiB
Size change:  -4.81 MiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Jan 20 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1:2.7-3
  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild

  * Fri Apr 22 2022 Artem Polishchuk  - 1:3.0.7-1
  - build(update): 3.0.7


Package:  esptool-3.3-1.fc37
Old package:  esptool-3.2-2.fc36
Summary:  A utility to communicate with the ROM bootloader in Espressif 
ESP8266 & ESP32
RPMs: esptool
Size: 273.76 KiB
Size change:  12.59 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Apr 11 2022 Karolina Surma  - 3.3-1
  - Update to 3.3
  Resolves: rhbz#2066963


Package:  foot-1.12.0-1.fc37
Old package:  foot-1.11.0-1.fc36
Summary:  Fast, lightweight and minimalistic Wayland terminal emulator
RPMs: foot foot-terminfo
Size: 1.16 MiB
Size change:  41.46 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Apr 22 2022 Aleksei Bavshin  - 1.12.0-1
  - Update to 1.12.0 (#2077953)
  - Example config was moved to /etc/xdg/foot/foot.ini (upstream change)
  - Install systemd unit files for foot --server


Package:  gap-pkg-semigroups-4.0.1-1.fc37
Old package:  gap-pkg-semigroups-4.0.0-1.fc37
Summary:  GAP methods for semigrou

Fedora 36 compose report: 20220423.n.0 changes

2022-04-23 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report 
OLD: Fedora-36-20220422.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220423.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   0 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   0 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =

= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Proposal: separate out gettext-tools from the main package

2022-04-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 09:04:31AM -, Sundeep Anand wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This proposal[1] is to extract the heavier part "tools" from the gettext main 
> package into a separate sub-package.
> Inline with upstream packaging hints[2].
> 
> pros: smaller footprint of the gettext main package.
> cons: a large numbers of packagers may get affected directly or indirectly. 
> (may require some initial changes) 
> 
> thoughts? they are very welcome.

I think this is reasonable. gettext is directly required by a
not-too-large number of packages, but grub2-tools is one of them. If
its dependency is reduced from ~5 MB to ~0.8 MB, we'll get this saving
on most normal installations.

I'd say go for it, make sure that both packages are installed on upgrades (*),
and publicize the change to all affected packagers.

(*) I.e. both packages after the split should have Obsoletes on the old
package with a version before the split.

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: grub2 BIOS booting iso and code

2022-04-23 Thread Thomas Schmitt 
Hi,

i uploaded a new GNU xorriso development tarball for the next experiment
with the Dell XPS 15 L502X of Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski.

The program will not interfere with the libraries or the /usr/bin/xorriso
binary which gets installed by Fedora from the xorriso package.
There are no special hard dependencies.
But i assume that the Fedora xorriso gets built with these optional
dependencies:
- libreadline development package
- zlib development package
- libacl development package
None of them should be needed for the experiment.

Download:

  https://www.gnu.org/software/xorriso/xorriso-1.5.5.tar.gz

MD5:
  e622b2547202529fbee6c9186fe39c40
  (This might change with future uploads of the xorriso-1.5.5 snapshot.
   The next stable release will be 1.5.6.)

Build:

  cd /...some.../...playground.../...directory...
  tar xzf /...where_it_was_downloaded.../xorriso-1.5.5.tar.gz
  cd xorriso-1.5.5
  ./configure --prefix=/usr
  make

This will produce a binary named
  ./xorriso/xorriso

Installation is not necessary. Just execute the path that is given by
  ls $(pwd)/xorriso/xorriso

Check whether it is willing to run:

  /...path.../xorriso/xorriso -version

It should report:

  GNU xorriso 1.5.5 : RockRidge filesystem manipulator, libburnia project.

  GNU xorriso 1.5.5
  ISO 9660 Rock Ridge filesystem manipulator and CD/DVD/BD burn program
  Copyright (C) 2021, Thomas Schmitt , libburnia project.
  xorriso version   :  1.5.5
  Version timestamp :  2022.04.22.113324
  Build timestamp   :  -none-given-
  libisofs   in use :  1.5.5  (min. 1.5.5)
  libjte in use :  2.0.0  (min. 2.0.0)
  libburnin use :  1.5.5  (min. 1.5.5)
  libburn OS adapter:  internal GNU/Linux SG_IO adapter sg-linux
  libisoburn in use :  1.5.5  (min. 1.5.5)
  License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later .
  This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
  There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.

The "libjte" line will only appear if zlib development was present at
compile time. All reported libraries are part of the tarball and linked
statically.

-

Now for the partition layout with GRUB which comes nearest to the layout
that was produced with ISOLINUX (quite like the result of isoybrid --uefi).
Begin like with the last experiment:

  # Extract the EFI partition
  dd if=boot-grub2-f36.iso bs=512 skip=1313268 count=20288 of=test_efi.img

  # Extract the MBR code
  dd if=boot-grub2-f36.iso bs=1 count=446 of=test_mbr.img

  # Pad MBR up to 32768 bytes, so that it overwrites the loaded system area
  dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=32322 >>test_mbr.img

The xorriso run shall bring the ISO as near to the old layout as possible:

  xorriso=/...path.../xorriso/xorriso

  new_iso=test_oldlayout.iso

  # xorriso in its native mode does not truncate -outdev
  test -e "$new_iso" && rm "$new_iso"

  "$xorriso" \
-indev boot-grub2-f36.iso \
-outdev "$new_iso" \
-map test_efi.img /images/efiboot.img \
-as mkisofs \
  -part_like_isohybrid \
  --grub2-mbr test_mbr.img \
  --boot-catalog-hide \
  -b /images/eltorito.img \
 -no-emul-boot -boot-load-size 4 -boot-info-table \
 --grub2-boot-info \
  -eltorito-alt-boot \
  -e images/efiboot.img \
-no-emul-boot -isohybrid-gpt-basdat \
  -R -J \
-- \
-padding included \
-compliance no_emul_toc \
-stdio_sync off

Inspect the resulting boot equipment and partition layout:

  "$xorriso" -indev "$new_iso" -report_el_torito plain -report_system_area plain

This should report:

  El Torito catalog  : 71  1
  El Torito images   :   N  Pltf  B   Emul  Ld_seg  Hdpt  Ldsiz LBA
  El Torito boot img :   1  BIOS  y   none  0x  0x00  4  72
  El Torito boot img :   2  UEFI  y   none  0x  0x00  20288  328252
  El Torito img path :   1  /images/eltorito.img
  El Torito img opts :   1  boot-info-table grub2-boot-info
  El Torito img path :   2  /images/efiboot.img
  System area options: 0x4a00
  System area summary: MBR grub2-mbr cyl-align-off GPT
  ISO image size/512 : 1333960
  Partition offset   : 0
  MBR heads per cyl  : 64
  MBR secs per head  : 32
  MBR partition table:   N Status  TypeStart   Blocks
  MBR partition  :   1   0x80  0x000  1333960
  MBR partition  :   2   0x00  0xef  131300820288
  MBR partition path :   2  /images/efiboot.img
  GPT:   N  Info
  GPT disk GUID  :  2040609c42db0e43ad879c51ee608215
  GPT entry array:  2  248  separated
  GPT lba range  :  64  1333896  1333959
  GPT partition name :   1  490053004f004800790062007200690064003100
  GPT partname local :   1  ISOHybrid1
  GPT partition GUID :   1  2040609c42db0e43ad869c51ee608215
  GPT type GUID  :   1  a2a0d0ebe5b9334487c068b6b72699c7
  GPT partition flags:   1  0x1001
  GPT start and size

Re: Modello update in rawhide

2022-04-23 Thread Mattia Verga via devel 
Il 22/04/22 19:14, Mikolaj Izdebski ha scritto:
> In one week modello package will be updated in rawhide (Fedora 37)
> from version 1.11 to version 2.0.0.
>
> Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053953
> PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/modello/pull-request/4
>
> The new major version introduces API break and packages may need to be
> ported to work with the new version.
>
> Packages that build-require modello and are possibly affected by this update:
>
> antlr-maven-plugin
> maven
> maven-archetype
> maven-assembly-plugin
> maven-doxia
> maven-doxia-sitetools
> maven-file-management
> maven-invoker-plugin
> maven-plugin-tools
> maven-remote-resources-plugin
> maven-scm
> maven2
> plexus-sec-dispatcher
> xmvn
>
>
> --
> Mikolaj Izdebski

Please build it in a side-tag, so that affected package maintainers can
try to rebuild their packages there and the final update can be delayed
until you're sure to not break anything.

Mattia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Rawhide-20220422.n.0 compose check report

2022-04-23 Thread Fedora compose checker 
Missing expected images:

Minimal raw-xz armhfp

Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed

Failed openQA tests: 12/231 (x86_64), 26/161 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220421.n.0):

ID: 1236236 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso anaconda_help
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236236
ID: 1236250 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236250
ID: 1236330 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236330
ID: 1236332 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236332
ID: 1236335 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236335
ID: 1236420 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236420
ID: 1236426 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade upgrade_desktop_64bit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236426
ID: 1236491 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236491
ID: 1236515 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236515
ID: 1236527 Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236527
ID: 1236533 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236533
ID: 1236542 Test: aarch64 universal install_package_set_minimal@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236542
ID: 1236543 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236543
ID: 1236545 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236545
ID: 1236550 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236550
ID: 1236554 Test: aarch64 universal install_blivet_xfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236554
ID: 1236556 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236556
ID: 1236557 Test: aarch64 universal install_multi_empty@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236557
ID: 1236569 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236569
ID: 1236571 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236571
ID: 1236591 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_repository_hd_variation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236591
ID: 1236593 Test: aarch64 universal support_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236593
ID: 1236594 Test: aarch64 universal install_pxeboot@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236594
ID: 1236595 Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_nfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236595

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220421.n.0):

ID: 1236221 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236221
ID: 1236242 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236242
ID: 1236277 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236277
ID: 1236280 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236280
ID: 1236323 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236323
ID: 1236349 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236349
ID: 1236360 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236360
ID: 1236416 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236416
ID: 1236421 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_fprint
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236421
ID: 1236570 Test: x86_64 universal install_serial_console
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236570
ID: 1236592 Test: aarch64 universal install_serial_console@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236592
ID: 1236596 Test: aarch64 universal install_iscsi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236596
ID: 1236625 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236625
ID: 1236627 Test: aarch64 universal install_rescue_encrypted@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1236627

Soft failed openQA tests: 11/231 (x86_64), 1/161