[Bug 2078560] New: perl-libwww-perl-6.63 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560 Bug ID: 2078560 Summary: perl-libwww-perl-6.63 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-libwww-perl Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: mspa...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: caillon+fedoraproj...@gmail.com, ka...@ucw.cz, mspa...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, rhug...@redhat.com, rstr...@redhat.com, sandm...@redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 6.63 Current version/release in rawhide: 6.62-1.fc37 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/libwww-perl/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3024/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Allow non-packagers to push to dist-git forks without fedpkg
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 03:44:01PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > If I understand correctly, SSH access is a security/legal/whatever > no-go for nonpackagers, but can we offer some kind of standard git > mechanism to authenticate? API tokens maybe? If there is a technical thing we want to do to make Fedora easier to contribute to, we should figure out how to remove any legal (or "whatever") blockers. And mitigate any security concerns. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Rawhide-20220425.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 8/231 (x86_64), 28/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220424.n.0): ID: 1239437 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_printing URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239437 ID: 1239513 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_resize_lvm@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239513 ID: 1239540 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_printing@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239540 ID: 1239541 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gnome_text_editor@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239541 ID: 1239543 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_printing_builtin@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239543 ID: 1239555 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239555 ID: 1239564 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_package_install_remove@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239564 ID: 1239724 Test: aarch64 universal install_multi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239724 ID: 1239798 Test: aarch64 universal support_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239798 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220424.n.0): ID: 1239384 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239384 ID: 1239440 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239440 ID: 1239443 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239443 ID: 1239482 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239482 ID: 1239484 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239484 ID: 1239491 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239491 ID: 1239493 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239493 ID: 1239496 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239496 ID: 1239510 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239510 ID: 1239521 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239521 ID: 1239582 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_fprint URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239582 ID: 1239587 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade upgrade_desktop_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239587 ID: 1239694 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239694 ID: 1239704 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239704 ID: 1239706 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239706 ID: 1239708 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239708 ID: 1239711 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239711 ID: 1239717 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239717 ID: 1239730 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239730 ID: 1239732 Test: x86_64 universal install_serial_console URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239732 ID: 1239733 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239733 ID: 1239794 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239794 ID: 1239797 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239797 ID: 1239799 Test: aarch64 universal install_pxeboot@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239799 ID: 1239801 Test: aarch64 universal install_iscsi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239801 ID: 1239803 Test: aarch64 universal install_serial_console@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239803 ID: 1239919 Test: aarch64 universal install_rescue_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239919 Soft failed openQA tests: 2/161 (aarch64), 11/231 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220424.n.0): ID: 1239556 Test: aarch64
[Bug 2077288] perl-Devel-CheckOS-1.93 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077288 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Devel-CheckOS-1.92 is |perl-Devel-CheckOS-1.93 is |available |available --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Latest upstream release: 1.93 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.87-3.fc36 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-CheckOS/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/2824/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077288 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2068801] Please build perl-Text-CSV for EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068801 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||needinfo?(lkund...@v3.sk) --- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck --- Lubomir, ping? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068801 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2078662] perl-experimental-0.028 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078662
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed. Details below:
GenericError: File upload failed:
cli-build/1650933358.6827047.gTMafpyN/perl-experimental-0.028-1.fc34.src.rpm
Traceback:
File
"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/hotness/use_cases/package_scratch_build_use_case.py",
line 56, in build
result = self.builder.build(request.package, request.opts)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line
198, in build
output["build_id"] = self._scratch_build(session, package.name, srpm)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line
451, in _scratch_build
session.uploadWrapper(source, serverdir)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/koji/__init__.py", line 3053, in
uploadWrapper
self.fastUpload(localfile, path, name, callback, blocksize, overwrite,
volume=volume)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/koji/__init__.py", line 2988, in
fastUpload
raise GenericError("File upload failed: %s/%s" % (path, name))
If you think this issue is caused by some bug in the-new-hotness, please report
it on the-new-hotness issue tracker:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078662
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2078662] New: perl-experimental-0.028 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078662 Bug ID: 2078662 Summary: perl-experimental-0.028 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-experimental Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, mspa...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.028 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.027-1.fc37 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/experimental/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/2857/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078662 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Thank You
Your article was very good, and you have given very good information in this article. I regularly read all the articles on your Website https://e-signindia.com/ https://acciojob.com/ https://shukriyasongs.com/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets retired. Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ Full report available at: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2022-04-25.txt grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain. For human readable dependency chains, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change erlang-riak_api bowlofeggs, erlang-maint-sig,1 weeks ago orphan erlang-riak_core bowlofeggs, erlang-maint-sig,1 weeks ago orphan forbidden-apisjvanek, orphan 1 weeks ago gnome-shell-extension-material- atim, orphan 2 weeks ago shell golang-github-astaxie-beego go-sig, orphan 2 weeks ago golang-github-influxdata- go-sig, orphan 1 weeks ago influxdb hd-idle atim, orphan 3 weeks ago jsoup mizdebsk, orphan 0 weeks ago libcxlorphan 1 weeks ago mcrconorphan 3 weeks ago mustache-dorphan 1 weeks ago python-django-auth-ldap orphan 0 weeks ago python-readthedocs-sphinx-ext jjames, orphan, python-sig 0 weeks ago qt5-qtcanvas3dkde-sig, orphan 5 weeks ago qt5-qtenginio kde-sig, lupinix, orphan 5 weeks ago quake2orphan 1 weeks ago rubygem-request_store orphan 3 weeks ago rust-ab_glyph orphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-alsa orphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-alsa-sys orphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-bitreaderorphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-build-envorphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-cgmath orphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-chlorine orphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-claxon orphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-cloudflare-zlib orphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-cloudflare-zlib-sys orphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-cpal orphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-cstr-argumentorphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-diffus-deriveorphan, rust-sig 5 weeks ago rust-fallible_collections orphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-fontconfig-parserorphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-genmesh orphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-glyph_brush_layout orphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-houndorphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-image-roll orphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-imguiorphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-imgui-sysorphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-lewton orphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-libdeflate-sys orphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-libdeflater orphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-libsystemd-sys orphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-libwebp-sys2 orphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-minimp3 orphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-minimp3-sys orphan, rust-sig 0 weeks ago rust-newsblur_api orphan, rust-sig 5 weeks ago rust-ogg orphan, rust-sig 0
Re: The future of FMN (Fedora Messaging Notifications)
On Fri, 2022-04-22 at 11:35 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 22. 04. 22 9:16, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > Hey folks! > > > > We're having a look at FMN these days, and we're trying to design its > > replacement in our Fedora Messaging enabled world. > > The current FMN has the following shortcomings: > > - too slow at runtime > > - slow at startup time (a couple of hours to startup…) > > - complex UI > > > > We think that this all comes from the same root cause: FMN is too flexible. > > It's trying to be everyone's procmail, and as a result the UI is complex > > and performance is hindered. > > > > Also, in the past years we've adopted quite a few external services > > (Discourse, Gitlab, etc) which come with their own notification systems, so > > the needs of FMN users may have changed, and FMN can no longer be the > > one-stop-shop of notifications it aimed to be. > > > > So we're planning to rewrite it as a much more simple notification system, > > with a few pre-defined things you could subscribe to, clearly presented in > > the UI but with less bells and whistles, and for that we're gathering your > > requirements. > > > > What do you want from Fedora's notifications? We have identified the > > following use cases: > > - I want to be notified of what happens on my artifacts (packages, > > containers, modules, flatpaks) > > - I want to be notified of what happens on any artifact by entering its > > type and its name > > - I want to be notified of events referring to my username > > - I want to be able to follow someone (for example, my mentee) > > - I want to be able to block or allow notifications from a particular > > application (koji, bodhi, dist-git, etc) > > - I want to my notifications to be sent via email and/or IRC > > > > Are there other use cases that would make your contributor's life easier? > > Groups. I want to be notified of what happens on group's artifacts, events > referring to the group's name. Replying to a reply because I can't find the original mail, sorry. I want to be easily able to *NOT* be notified of things I just did. In fact this should probably be the default. Right now my FMN notifications are floods of "adamwill did X to Y" - yes, I know, I just did it! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: A way to prepare custom source tarballs from .spec file to improve CI experience
On 25/04/2022 14:54, Fabio Valentini wrote: How would the program know if this Source is one that should be executed, or not? We can execute SourceX files with chmod 0755 and .sh extension. Which is why I suggested to use a marker comment like "# SourceScript: foo.sh". It will not be included into SRPM. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: A way to prepare custom source tarballs from .spec file to improve CI experience
Dne 25. 04. 22 v 10:41 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): 1) Standalone script is kind of against RPM philosophy, where the idea always was that the .spec file should contain everything. We already have signature of source files as additional source. But the additional section as suggested by Marián works for me too. I just want to take the script and paste it somewhere without worrying about escaping or wrapping. Miroslav ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Allow non-packagers to push to dist-git forks without fedpkg
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 11:01:27AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 9:54 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > Hello folks, > > > > what would it take to allow non-packagers to push to dist-git forks without > > fedpkg? > > > > The instructions at > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/pull-requests/#_you_are_not_a_packager > > assume they run Fedora (or another distro with fedpkg), but this is > > extremely > > unfriendly to contributors who run other distros. > > > > The alternative is external pull request which is awesome in theory but > > quite > > tedious in practice. E.g. as a package maintainer, I cannot push my changes > > to > > a proposed external pull request. > > > > If I understand correctly, SSH access is a security/legal/whatever no-go for > > nonpackagers, but can we offer some kind of standard git mechanism to > > authenticate? API tokens maybe? > > > > If not, can we at least extract the fedpkg bits that do this and release > > that > > as a standalone easy-to-install software that we can offer or even package > > to > > other distributions? > > > > We should just turn on Pagure's ability to let you create API tokens > that can do HTTPS auth for git push on src.fedoraproject.org. The > janky setup we have now predates introducing support in Pagure itself. We have, but it's incompatible with the existing oauth setup, so we need to figure out how we can transition that without breaking everyone or get them both to work. :( kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: "The system is going down for suspend NOW!" broadcast messages
On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 16:28 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > V Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 12:54:10PM +0200, Sandro Mani napsal(a): > > Since some recent update (can't pinpoint which exactly), everytime the > > system suspends, it sends a "The system is going down for suspend NOW!" > > broadcast message to all terminals. Any idea anyone how to switch this off? > > (Running up-to-date rawhide). > > > What's wrong with the message? Do you not want to notify all the users of your > system that it will be powered down? On a workstation? No, you already know you are suspending and there is no need to spam terminals, you want them to stay as they are so when yo un-suspend the output is not "corrupted". > This message is emitted by shutdown tool. That tool has --no-wall option to > disable the message. You need to find out what executes that command and then > patch it. It could be e.g. systemd/logind. Is this an upstream change? Simo. -- Simo Sorce RHEL Crypto Team Red Hat, Inc ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon] PR #13: Remove dependency to Module::Build::Tiny (patched by patch0)
ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Remove dependency to Module::Build::Tiny (patched by patch0)` that you are following: `` Good catch. One writes so many patches to remove the unwanted dependencies and then he forgets to remove a declaration of the dependency. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/13 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2076894] Add perl-List-AllUtils to EPEL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076894 Bug 2076894 depends on bug 2078462, which changed state. Bug 2078462 Summary: Add perl-Scalar-List-Utils to EPEL8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078462 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076894 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2078462] Add perl-Scalar-List-Utils to EPEL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078462 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX CC||jples...@redhat.com Last Closed||2022-04-25 14:42:32 --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- perl-Scalar-List-Utils can't be added to EPEL because perl-Scalar-List-Utils-1.49 is in RHEL 8 repositories. Add perl-List-AllUtils-0.18 maybe is enough. There is required only perl-Scalar-List-Utils >= 1.45. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078462 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: "The system is going down for suspend NOW!" broadcast messages
V Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 12:54:10PM +0200, Sandro Mani napsal(a): > Since some recent update (can't pinpoint which exactly), everytime the > system suspends, it sends a "The system is going down for suspend NOW!" > broadcast message to all terminals. Any idea anyone how to switch this off? > (Running up-to-date rawhide). > What's wrong with the message? Do you not want to notify all the users of your system that it will be powered down? This message is emitted by shutdown tool. That tool has --no-wall option to disable the message. You need to find out what executes that command and then patch it. It could be e.g. systemd/logind. -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon] PR #16: Remove dependency to Module::Build::Tiny (patched by patch0)
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Remove dependency to Module::Build::Tiny (patched by patch0) `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/16 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2076894] Add perl-List-AllUtils to EPEL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076894 --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar --- Then consider adding an older perl-List-AllUtils which does not need incompatible perl-List-SomeUtils. At the end, perl-List-AllUtils does nothing except from importing (almost) all functions from the three modules. So an exact version of perl-List-AllUtils shouldn't matter. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076894 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon] PR #16: Remove dependency to Module::Build::Tiny (patched by patch0)
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that you are following: `` Remove dependency to Module::Build::Tiny (patched by patch0) `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/16 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: A way to prepare custom source tarballs from .spec file to improve CI experience
+1 to using an rpm macro to avoid adding an external script, if spectool can work with it. Something like: %global source0_generate_script ( \ curl ... \ rm -rf ... \ tar ... ) I'm not sure if that syntax is correct.___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2078251] perl-Text-Bidi-2.16 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078251 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||CPAN 142417 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078251 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon] PR #15: Remove dependency to Module::Build::Tiny (patched by patch0)
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Remove dependency to Module::Build::Tiny (patched by patch0) `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/15 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Non-responsive maintainer check for icon
Hello. Anyone know how to contact with Konstantin Ryabitsev, FAS: icon? - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078516 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1742343 - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pyotp/pull-request/2 cc: mri...@gmail.com ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2078251] perl-Text-Bidi-2.16 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078251
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ---
The newly added t/get_mirror_char.t test fails on s390x only (big-endian?):
t/00-version.t . ok
# Failed test 'Wrong mirror for 0x0029 (LEFT PARENTHESIS)'
# at t/get_mirror_char.t line 18.
# got: '('
# expected: ''
# Failed test 'Wrong mirror for 0x0028 (RIGHT PARENTHESIS)'
# at t/get_mirror_char.t line 18.
# got: ')'
# expected: ''
[...]
# Looks like you failed 428 tests of 428.
t/get_mirror_char.t
Dubious, test returned 254 (wstat 65024, 0xfe00)
Failed 428/428 subtests
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078251
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2078251] perl-Text-Bidi-2.16 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078251
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ---
Or because of an unsigned char:
--- Text-Bidi-2.15/swig/fribidi.i 2018-09-24 18:08:52.0 +0200
+++ Text-Bidi-2.16/swig/fribidi.i 2022-04-24 22:30:38.0 +0200
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@
%}
%apply const FriBidiChar* str { const FriBidiCharType* bidi_types }
+%apply unsigned long { FriBidiChar ch }
%apply unsigned long *OUTPUT { FriBidiChar *mirrored_ch }
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078251
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon] PR #15: Remove dependency to Module::Build::Tiny (patched by patch0)
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that you are following: `` Remove dependency to Module::Build::Tiny (patched by patch0) `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/15 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon] PR #14: Remove dependency to Module::Build::Tiny (patched by patch0)
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Remove dependency to Module::Build::Tiny (patched by patch0) `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/14 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2078251] perl-Text-Bidi-2.16 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078251 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- A bug-fix release suitable for all Fedoras. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078251 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon] PR #14: Remove dependency to Module::Build::Tiny (patched by patch0)
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that you are following: `` Remove dependency to Module::Build::Tiny (patched by patch0) `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/14 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: A way to prepare custom source tarballs from .spec file to improve CI experience
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 2:46 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 25/04/2022 13:42, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > For example, we could use something like:
> > # SourceScript: gen_clean_tarball.sh
>
> Source1: gen_clean_tarball.sh
Well, doing that alone wouldn't work. How would the program know if
this Source is one that should be executed, or not?
So, even if the script is included as a Source file for the SRPM, we'd
still need to specify *which* file to actually execute (if any).
Which is why I suggested to use a marker comment like "# SourceScript: foo.sh".
> > That would make it easy for spectool to parse this information from
> > the .spec file, and then execute the program with that name.
>
> Can be easily parsed even with regular expression.
Sure. script_path = if line.startswith("# SourceScript:"): line.split(" \t")[1]
That's not a problem. But we still need to specify *which* source file
is actually the script to run (if any).
Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon] PR #13: Remove dependency to Module::Build::Tiny (patched by patch0)
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Remove dependency to Module::Build::Tiny (patched by patch0) `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/13 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: A way to prepare custom source tarballs from .spec file to improve CI experience
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 7:51 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 10:51 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > 2) Standalone script does not solve the main issue and that is a way CI > > could obtain the tarball. Of course you mentioned "with support for > > extraction in spectool", but that is also part of the issue, because that > > would need the "spectool" changes as well as CI changes. My proposal does > > not need that. Of course, this is proof of concept, while the part of the > > script you point out could be possibly improved and abstracted by some > > macro. > > This has come up before, but given that the current maintainer of > spectool (which is me) has offered to implement support for this, I > don't see this as a problem. > I also assume that the CI you're talking about already calls spectool > to download package sources for new versions, so doing this would > actually make any changes to the CI environment entirely unnecessary. > > We'd just need to agree on a way to specify the path to the script > that needs to be run for generating source X. > For example, we could use something like: > # SourceScript: gen_clean_tarball.sh > > That would make it easy for spectool to parse this information from > the .spec file, and then execute the program with that name. > We could possibly also supply some variables as command line arguments > to that script, for example, the current "Version" from the .spec > file, so it doesn't have to be modified in two places. > The "easy" thing to do would be to define a config file to check into Dist-Git to run source services. We could even reuse the ones that the openSUSE community wrote for the Open Build Service. I could easily write a harness to run them inside the Koji task for producing the SRPM. I already did something similar for my workplace, for example. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: A way to prepare custom source tarballs from .spec file to improve CI experience
On 25/04/2022 13:42, Fabio Valentini wrote: For example, we could use something like: # SourceScript: gen_clean_tarball.sh Source1: gen_clean_tarball.sh That would make it easy for spectool to parse this information from the .spec file, and then execute the program with that name. Can be easily parsed even with regular expression. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon] PR #13: Remove dependency to Module::Build::Tiny (patched by patch0)
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that you are following: `` Remove dependency to Module::Build::Tiny (patched by patch0) `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/13 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2078464] New: Add perl-List-UtilsBy to EPEL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078464 Bug ID: 2078464 Summary: Add perl-List-UtilsBy to EPEL8 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-List-UtilsBy Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de Reporter: mspa...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, rc040...@freenet.de Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora I need perl-List-UtilsBy (min 0.11) for perl-List-AllUtils in EPEL 8. Could you add it there? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078464 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220425.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220424.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220425.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:30 Upgraded packages: 56 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 4.36 MiB Size of dropped packages:12.81 MiB Size of upgraded packages: 4.57 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 1.36 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: golang-github-pelletier-toml-2-2.0.0~beta.8-3.fc37 Summary: Go library for the TOML file format RPMs:golang-github-pelletier-toml-2 golang-github-pelletier-toml-2-devel Size:4.36 MiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: rust-clipboard-0.5.0-6.fc36 Summary: a library for getting and setting the contents of the clipboard RPMs:rust-clipboard+default-devel rust-clipboard-devel Size:26.67 KiB Package: rust-diffus-0.10.0-2.fc36 Summary: Finds the difference between two instances of any data structure RPMs:rust-diffus+default-devel rust-diffus+derive-devel rust-diffus+diffus-derive-devel rust-diffus+indexmap-devel rust-diffus+indexmap-impl-devel rust-diffus+serde-devel rust-diffus+serialize-impl-devel rust-diffus+snake_case-devel rust-diffus+snake_case-impl-devel rust-diffus+uuid-devel rust-diffus+uuid-impl-devel rust-diffus-devel Size:101.15 KiB Package: rust-enum-repr-0.2.6-5.fc36 Summary: Derive enum repr conversions compatible with type aliases RPMs:rust-enum-repr+default-devel rust-enum-repr-devel Size:25.39 KiB Package: rust-fontdb-0.9.1-1.fc37 Summary: Simple, in-memory font database with CSS-like queries RPMs:rust-fontdb+default-devel rust-fontdb+fontconfig-devel rust-fontdb+fontconfig-parser-devel rust-fontdb+fs-devel rust-fontdb+memmap-devel rust-fontdb+memmap2-devel rust-fontdb-devel Size:65.68 KiB Package: rust-fontdue-0.7.2-1.fc37 Summary: Simple no_std font parser and rasterizer RPMs:rust-fontdue+default-devel rust-fontdue+freetype-rs-devel rust-fontdue+freetype_benchmark-devel rust-fontdue+parallel-devel rust-fontdue+rayon-devel rust-fontdue+simd-devel rust-fontdue-devel Size:182.75 KiB Package: rust-imgui-winit-support-0.8.2-2.fc37 Summary: Winit support code for the imgui crate RPMs:rust-imgui-winit-support+default-devel rust-imgui-winit-support+no-warn-on-multiple-devel rust-imgui-winit-support+winit-26-devel rust-imgui-winit-support-devel Size:46.31 KiB Package: rust-kurbo-0.8.3-2.fc37 Summary: 2D curves library RPMs:rust-kurbo+default-devel rust-kurbo+mint-devel rust-kurbo+serde-devel rust-kurbo-devel Size:95.84 KiB Package: rust-libwebp-0.1.2-4.fc36 Summary: Binding to libwebp RPMs:rust-libwebp+0_5-devel rust-libwebp+0_6-devel rust-libwebp+1_1-devel rust-libwebp+__doc_cfg-devel rust-libwebp+default-devel rust-libwebp+demux-devel rust-libwebp+extern-types-devel rust-libwebp+mux-devel rust-libwebp+static-devel rust-libwebp-devel Size:89.20 KiB Package: rust-macroquad_macro-0.1.7-2.fc36 Summary: Proc macro for macroquad RPMs:rust-macroquad_macro+default-devel rust-macroquad_macro-devel Size:23.71 KiB Package: rust-mp4parse-0.12.0-2.fc36 Summary: Parser for ISO base media file format (mp4) RPMs:rust-mp4parse+3gpp-devel rust-mp4parse+default-devel rust-mp4parse+meta-xml-devel rust-mp4parse+missing-pixi-permitted-devel rust-mp4parse+mp4v-devel rust-mp4parse+unstable-api-devel rust-mp4parse-devel Size:342.34 KiB Package: rust-msgbox-0.7.0-1.fc37 Summary: Multi-platform message box modal, which runs synchronously RPMs:rust-msgbox+default-devel rust-msgbox-devel Size:22.08 KiB Package: rust-obj-0.10.2-6.fc36 Summary: Package for loading Wavefront .obj files RPMs:rust-obj+default-devel rust-obj+genmesh-devel rust-obj-devel Size:38.31 KiB Package: rust-oxipng-5.0.1-6.fc37 Summary: Lossless PNG compression optimizer RPMs:oxipng rust-oxipng+binary-devel rust-oxipng+clap-devel rust-oxipng+default-devel rust-oxipng+filetime-devel rust-oxipng+libdeflater-devel rust-oxipng+parallel-devel rust-oxipng+rayon-devel rust-oxipng+stderrlog-devel rust-oxipng+wild-devel rust-oxipng+zopfli-devel rust-oxipng-devel Size:2.73 MiB Package: rust-pistoncore-window-0.47.1-1.fc37 Summary: Library for window abstraction RPMs:rust-pistoncore-window+default-devel rust-pistoncore-window-devel Size:22.47 KiB Package: rust-psd-0.3.0-2.fc36 Summary: Rust API for parsing and working with PSD files RPMs:rust-psd+default-devel rust-psd-devel Size:86.49 KiB Package: rust-quad-rand-0.2.1-4.fc36 Summary: Pseudo random implementation with std atomics RPMs:rust-quad-rand+default-devel rust-quad-rand+rand-devel rust-quad-rand-devel Size:25.72 KiB Package: rust-radix64-0.6.2-3.fc36 Summary: Base64 library by another name RPMs:rust-radix64+default-devel rust-radix64+simd-devel rust-radix64-devel Size:57.40 KiB Package
[Bug 2076894] Add perl-List-AllUtils to EPEL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076894 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||2078462 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078462 [Bug 2078462] Add perl-Scalar-List-Utils to EPEL8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076894 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2076894] Add perl-List-AllUtils to EPEL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076894 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||2078464 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078464 [Bug 2078464] Add perl-List-UtilsBy to EPEL8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076894 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2078462] Add perl-Scalar-List-Utils to EPEL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078462 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2076894 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076894 [Bug 2076894] Add perl-List-AllUtils to EPEL8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078462 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2078462] New: Add perl-Scalar-List-Utils to EPEL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078462 Bug ID: 2078462 Summary: Add perl-Scalar-List-Utils to EPEL8 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Scalar-List-Utils Assignee: jpazdzi...@redhat.com Reporter: mspa...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: iarn...@gmail.com, jpazdzi...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora I need perl-Scalar-List-Utils (min 1.56) for perl-List-AllUtils in EPEL 8. Could you add it there? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078462 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2078464] Add perl-List-UtilsBy to EPEL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078464 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2076894 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076894 [Bug 2076894] Add perl-List-AllUtils to EPEL8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078464 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: A way to prepare custom source tarballs from .spec file to improve CI experience
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 10:51 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > 2) Standalone script does not solve the main issue and that is a way CI could > obtain the tarball. Of course you mentioned "with support for extraction in > spectool", but that is also part of the issue, because that would need the > "spectool" changes as well as CI changes. My proposal does not need that. Of > course, this is proof of concept, while the part of the script you point out > could be possibly improved and abstracted by some macro. This has come up before, but given that the current maintainer of spectool (which is me) has offered to implement support for this, I don't see this as a problem. I also assume that the CI you're talking about already calls spectool to download package sources for new versions, so doing this would actually make any changes to the CI environment entirely unnecessary. We'd just need to agree on a way to specify the path to the script that needs to be run for generating source X. For example, we could use something like: # SourceScript: gen_clean_tarball.sh That would make it easy for spectool to parse this information from the .spec file, and then execute the program with that name. We could possibly also supply some variables as command line arguments to that script, for example, the current "Version" from the .spec file, so it doesn't have to be modified in two places. Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: A way to prepare custom source tarballs from .spec file to improve CI experience
I would also be interested in this. In our set of java packages we have
a few cases where upstream releases .jars with bundled binary files
which either cannot be stored within .src.rpm files because of licensing
issues or because they would be unreasonably large. Example here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/byte-buddy/blob/rawhide/f/generate-tarball.sh
Our scripts are mostly copy-paste with some additional removals where
needed. This is in addition to the %prep step where we tend to remove
some parts as well. I never questioned this approach but I agree that I
would like to have it automated.
When repackaging, there are issues that need to be addressed and decided
whether they pose a real problem like file attributes, file sorting,
timestamps for example.
It looks like we would want some %pre-prep step :)
On 25. 4. 2022 10:41, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 21. 04. 22 v 14:58 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
Dne 21. 04. 22 v 13:20 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Now I am looking for feedback about general approach. Of course it
could be somehow polished and improved to hide some boiler plate.
This part:
%{echo:%(
[ ! -e %{S:1} ] &&
Looks really clumsy. After reading the
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1132#comment-769233
I like
# Script: gen_clean_tarball.sh
approach. Whether it will be special comment, macro (with support for
extraction in spectool) or new tag in RPM - I do not care. The
important part is that it is standalone file, which can be easily
locally executed. That would ease development and debugging.
1) Standalone script is kind of against RPM philosophy, where the idea
always was that the .spec file should contain everything.
2) Standalone script does not solve the main issue and that is a way
CI could obtain the tarball. Of course you mentioned "with support for
extraction in spectool", but that is also part of the issue, because
that would need the "spectool" changes as well as CI changes. My
proposal does not need that. Of course, this is proof of concept,
while the part of the script you point out could be possibly improved
and abstracted by some macro.
Vít
Miroslav
___
devel mailing list --devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email todevel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List
Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report
it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
devel mailing list --devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email todevel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List
Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report
it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
--
Marián Konček
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Modello update in rawhide
Il 24/04/22 22:06, Mikolaj Izdebski ha scritto: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 1:56 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 7:26 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: >>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 9:32 AM Mattia Verga via devel >>> wrote: Il 22/04/22 19:14, Mikolaj Izdebski ha scritto: > In one week modello package will be updated in rawhide (Fedora 37) > from version 1.11 to version 2.0.0. > > Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053953 > PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/modello/pull-request/4 > > The new major version introduces API break and packages may need to be > ported to work with the new version. > > Packages that build-require modello and are possibly affected by this > update: > > antlr-maven-plugin > maven > maven-archetype > maven-assembly-plugin > maven-doxia > maven-doxia-sitetools > maven-file-management > maven-invoker-plugin > maven-plugin-tools > maven-remote-resources-plugin > maven-scm > maven2 > plexus-sec-dispatcher > xmvn > > > -- > Mikolaj Izdebski Please build it in a side-tag, so that affected package maintainers can try to rebuild their packages there and the final update can be delayed until you're sure to not break anything. >>> Using side tags for single build updates is an overkill. There are >>> many different ways of testing packages, most of them don't involve >>> using sidetags. But if anyone actually wants to test modello update in >>> a sidetag, let me know and I will create one. >> I think Mattia wanted to say that this should not be a single-build >> update at all, given that it breaks API and probably requires changes >> in dependent packages. Hence, the update + all required adaptations >> should only be pushed together, as a single update. > I've just built Modello 2.0.0 in Koji: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1955290 > Anyone interested can test dependent packages against this build. > If dependent packages need to be fixed to work with updated Modello, > their builds can be submitted together with Modello as a multi-build update. > Otherwise I'll submit Modello 2.0.0 as a single-build Bodhi update on Friday. > > -- > Mikolaj Izdebsk > > As said before, you should (must) not submit the update as a single build update, because this will break dependent packages in rawhide. You must build your package in a side-tag and coordinate with maintainers of dependent packages OR take care of rebuild those packages in the side-tag OR ask any provenpackager to do so (if the primary maintainer is unresponsive). See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Update_Guide/#updating_inter_dependent_packages Mattia ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
"The system is going down for suspend NOW!" broadcast messages
Hi Since some recent update (can't pinpoint which exactly), everytime the system suspends, it sends a "The system is going down for suspend NOW!" broadcast message to all terminals. Any idea anyone how to switch this off? (Running up-to-date rawhide). Thanks Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2078251] perl-Text-Bidi-2.16 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078251 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|ppi...@redhat.com | Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078251 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-34-20220425.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220424.0): ID: 1239325 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239325 ID: 1239334 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239334 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2076894] Add perl-List-AllUtils to EPEL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076894 --- Comment #2 from Michal Josef Spacek --- In case of build of this module we need: * Update perl-List-SomeUtils to 0.58 (with incopatible changes) * Build perl-Scalar-List-Utils on EPEL8 * Build perl-List-UtilsBy on EPEL8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076894 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2071455] perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.103 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071455 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On|2069002 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069002 [Bug 2069002] zlib-1.2.12 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071455 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-IoT-36-20220425.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220422.0): ID: 1239250 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239250 Passed openQA tests: 15/15 (x86_64), 14/15 (aarch64) Installed system changes in test aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi: System load changed from 0.12 to 0.33 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1234300#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239251#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: A way to prepare custom source tarballs from .spec file to improve CI experience
Dne 21. 04. 22 v 14:58 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
Dne 21. 04. 22 v 13:20 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Now I am looking for feedback about general approach. Of course it
could be somehow polished and improved to hide some boiler plate.
This part:
%{echo:%(
[ ! -e %{S:1} ] &&
Looks really clumsy. After reading the
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1132#comment-769233
I like
# Script: gen_clean_tarball.sh
approach. Whether it will be special comment, macro (with support for
extraction in spectool) or new tag in RPM - I do not care. The
important part is that it is standalone file, which can be easily
locally executed. That would ease development and debugging.
1) Standalone script is kind of against RPM philosophy, where the idea
always was that the .spec file should contain everything.
2) Standalone script does not solve the main issue and that is a way CI
could obtain the tarball. Of course you mentioned "with support for
extraction in spectool", but that is also part of the issue, because
that would need the "spectool" changes as well as CI changes. My
proposal does not need that. Of course, this is proof of concept, while
the part of the script you point out could be possibly improved and
abstracted by some macro.
Vít
Miroslav
___
devel mailing list --devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email todevel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List
Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report
it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2077027] perl-local-lib-2.000029 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077027 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value CC|iarn...@gmail.com, | |jples...@redhat.com,| |mspa...@redhat.com | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077027 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2071438] perl-IO-Compress-2.106 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071438 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-IO-Compress-2.106-1.fc ||37 Last Closed||2022-04-25 08:13:39 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071438 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-IoT-37-20220425.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (aarch64) ID: 1239220 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239220 ID: 1239233 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1239233 Passed openQA tests: 15/15 (x86_64), 13/15 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2071455] perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.103 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071455 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version||perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.10 ||3-1.fc37 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Last Closed||2022-04-25 07:13:01 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071455 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2071438] perl-IO-Compress-2.106 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071438 Bug 2071438 depends on bug 2071455, which changed state. Bug 2071455 Summary: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.103 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071455 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071438 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2071455] perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.103 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071455 --- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova --- (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #1) > Any reason for blocking perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.103 on zlib-1.2.12? > perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.103 works with both old and new zlib. I have > prepared an update. Can I push it to rawhide? Finishing this upgrade would > unblock other packages. I have also prepared update. However, perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.103 has bundled zlib 1.2.12, so I want to build it with this version. There is some problems with zlib update, so I will not wait for it and update the package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071455 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
