[HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Boost 1.78 rebuilds starting in a side tag

[Thomas Rodgers]

We are starting the rebuilds
forhttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F37Boost178
 in the f37-boost
side tag.

If your package depends on Boost, or just if you see a "Rebuilt for
Boost 1.78" commit pushed to your package's dist-git repo, please
co-ordinate with me about any updates to the
package. If you need to push other changes to rawhide then you will
need to build in the side tag, or we'll have to rebuild it multiple
times.

I hope we'll merge the side tag back to rawhide on Friday.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2081541] New: Please branch and build perl-List-Compare for epel8 and epel9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081541

Bug ID: 2081541
   Summary: Please branch and build perl-List-Compare for epel8
and epel9
   Product: Fedora EPEL
   Version: epel8
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-List-Compare
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: mike@sonic.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Please branch and build perl-List-Compare for epel8 and epel9


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081541
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[David Woodhouse]

On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 19:33 +0200, Clemens Lang wrote:
> This is the reason why the proposal contains extensive methods to test
> whether things are going to break by modifying the crypto-policy or using
> bpftrace. Unfortunately there are hundreds of packages that depend on
> cryptographic libraries, and millions of different configurations out there.
> We can’t know ahead of time which ones of them are going to break, but the
> proposal provides tools and a long transition period to identify and fix
> them.

When changes like this broke things for users in the past, we talked
about a way to present the "insufficient crypto/digest/protocol" as
just another failure like server certificate validation failures, so
the application/user can *choose* to accept and proceed, in real time.

I'd like to see that as a *condition* of acceptance of further
restrictions in the policy.

I really don't want us continuing to break things for Fedora users and
driving them back to the proprietary VPN clients.

I am pleased to see some progress on this front with 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnutlsAllowlisting but it isn't
clear to me that this gives us what we need. We *want* to warn users
that their VPN server doesn't meet modern crypto standards. We don't
want to just blindly re-enable ancient crap and have it silently work.
But we also do *need* it to work, after we've warned the user about it.

Which is why handling it like a certificate validation failure seems to
be the right answer, but I'm happy to explore other solutions... but
preferably *not* solutions like "manually set
GNUTLS_SYSTEM_PRIORTY_FILE=/dev/null in your Fedora package to
explicitly override all the Fedora crypto policies". That suggestion 
made me sad... :)



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2068801] Please build perl-Text-CSV for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068801



--- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck  ---
Lubomir, please branch and build perl-Text-CSV in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain perl-Text-CSV in epel9, or do not think you will
be able to do this in a timely manner, the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to
be a co-maintainer of the package; please add the epel-packagers-sig group
through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Text-CSV/addgroup and grant it
commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.

I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: robert).


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068801
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2058821] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.914 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058821



--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.914-1.fc34.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86599540


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058821
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2058821] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.914 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058821



--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1876824
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1876824=edit
Update to 1.914 (#2058821)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058821
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2058821] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.914 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058821

Upstream Release Monitoring  
changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.9 |perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.9
   |13 is available |14 is available



--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Latest upstream release: 1.914
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.912-1.fc37
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-OpenSSL-X509/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2749/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058821
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Third-party repositories and Fedora

[Matthew Miller]

On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 10:51:10PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On a related note:
> I've had a package stuck in package review, because the reviewer
> (rightfully) wanted clarification whether we could ship some files.
> We blocked the FE-Legal bug in bugzilla on the review bug over a month
> ago, but have not received any response yet, either.
> Is that bug even still being monitored? Or is it no longer the correct
> way to request legal review for something? If that is the case, what
> *is* the correct way to do things?

That's still the correct way. We're working on unsticking some things.
Again, I really appreciate your patience. If there are things which are both
immediate and urgent but not getting a response — or anything big or small
that isn't getting a response in an egegiously long time — please escalate
them to the Fedora Council (a ticket is fine) or to me directly (by whatever
channel).


-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Chris Murphy]

On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 11:32 AM Jeremy Linton  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 5/2/22 22:53, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 5:29 PM Jeremy Linton 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/6/22 12:57, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> (trimming)
> >>> * NVIDIA graphics
> >>> * Broadcom wireless
> >>>
> >>> The former case is excessively common, and the latter case is fairly
> >>> common with HP and Dell machines as well as some smaller OEMs. I
> >>> literally helped someone this past week with both[1][2][3]. The
> >>> Workstation WG has been tracking both issues for years now[4][5]. This
> >>> situation is *worse* now because we have Fedora Linux preloaded on
> >>> computers, and OEMs basically have to disable Secure Boot to make
> >>> things "work". How's that for improving security?
> >>
> >> I too have been a bit surprised at some of the difficulties of
> >> hibernate/secure boot on recent fedora releases. It seems people are
> >> entirely unaware that ACPI/S3 standby is gone from most consumer
> >> laptops, and the modern standby replacement implementations tend to work
> >> very poorly WRT conserving battery with the lid closed in Linux.
> >
> > It's a kernel problem. I'm not sure to what degree upstream is aware
> > of it. But there's not a lot we can do about it except file bugs and
> > ask for improvement.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> So, on a recent fedora machine, it took me more than 4 hours to get a
> >> hibernation file on btrfs plus LUKS encrypted partition working. The
> >> documentation for that wasn't to be found anywhere on the fedora/RH
> >> sites and required compiling a tool to do the block offset calculations
> >> and manually adding the resume_offset options to grub/etc. All while
> >> avoiding the mass of incorrect information found on the internet. And of
> >> course it also requires disabling swap on zram (which was nonsense on
> >> the machine anyway, given the disks are faster than it can
> >> compress/decompress pages).
> >
> > I don't think it requires disabling swap on zram per se - from what
> > I've been told the hibernation code knows it can't use it for the
> > hibernation image, not least of which is it's not big enough for a
> > contiguous write of the image. The issue might be that so much needs
> > to be swapped out, to free ~50% RAM, which is used to create the
> > hibernation image in memory before it's written out. We need a clear
> > reproducer with logs and get it posted to the Linux memory management
> > mailing list to see what's going wrong. Since zram is threaded, it's
> > pretty unlikely drive writes are faster than memory writes with
> > compression. LZO+RLE is computationally pretty cheap.
>
> DMA is computationally free. and at >3GB/sec on modern hw with
> sufficient queue depth or contiguous. And the RLE improvements only help
> when the page is basically empty. AKA its a great chrome benchmark tool,
> less so for real workloads.
>

Quite a lot of folks in the Fedora community do not have NVMe drives. If
you have a real workload that's straightforward to reproduce better
performance when swap on NVME plain partition vs zram, I'd like to give it
a go. There'a always tradeoffs, the goal is to do a good job for most use
cases, not optimize for a few.



> >
> >
> >>
> >> And of course the lockdown patches in the kernel still aren't smart
> >> enough to be able to detect that the swapfile is actually encrypted, so
> >> it also requires disabling secure boot (this IMHO is frankly
> >> unacceptable, that one can't have both options enabled at the same
> time).
> >
> > Encryption isn't enough to ensure the image is valid. It needs to be
> > signed. But in any case this is also upstream effort required,
> > including discovering the offset via a standard API for all file
> > systems.
>
> Yes, I'm aware much of this is a kernel problem, but the point being
> that in the meantime, most random machines people are buying at retail
> won't last more than a day or so without being plugged in using fedora,
> vs many days with windows because its hibernating with secure boot
> turned on.
>

On a recently purchased Lenovo, s2idle is what's used with Windows 10 sleep
set in the firmware setup. I see about 1% battery drop per hour. When
switching it to Linux sleep, it uses ACPI S3, and I see maybe 1% battery
drop per 8 hours. I don't know why. But until there's
authenticated+encrypted hibernation images, I think there's not much to be
done out of the box. Even once we have hibernation images, we can't depend
on hibernation working for various reasons:

https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/blob/master/f/hibernationstatus.md

It's not good that hibernation doesn't work well right now. But it's
possible to give users an even worse experience, including a false sense of
security regarding their data when hibernation is used.




-- 
Chris Murphy
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

rdkit package re-review

[Antonio T. sagitter]

Hi all.

rdkit package is under re-review for unretiring.
Please, take a look if you can.

Bug ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081113

Regards
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE
GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Splitting alternative Python packages into subpackages, e.g. python3.11{,libs,devel,...}

[Miro Hrončok]

On 16. 03. 22 17:12, Tomáš Orsava wrote:

Hi Python-devel,
we are considering splitting the alternative Python versions from a 
single-package format (e.g. python3.11) to multiple subpackages (e.g. 
python3.11{,-libs,-devel,-tkinter,-test,-idle}). We do this already with the 
main `python3` package: it requires less disk space to install and speeds up 
download times, because you can chose which bits are important to you. For 
example, if you decide you don't need python3-tkinter, you save yourself ~18 
dependent packages leading to a total savings of ~20MBs, while skipping 
python3-test saves you further ~10MBs.


What do you think?

The push came from [BZ#2063227] where the reporters would welcome to have a 
smaller python3.11 package for containers and VMs for local testing, CI 
purposes and more.
This would be a larger amount of work, so our initial reaction was hesitant. 
We'll have to change the already complicated spec file %bcond logic, and adjust 
the ecosystem to work with the new subpackages. For example tox would need to 
Recommend `python3.11-devel`, as `python3.11` would bring in only the bare 
interpreter. And of course a thorough integration testing would be in order.


However, we already do separate subpackages for alternative stacks in 
Enterprise Linux (CentOS /Stream, RHEL, EPEL) and as a general rule we consider 
it good to have fewer differences between Fedora and EL. This helps to test 
things earlier, and there are fewer surprises in user experience. So perhaps 
the effort in doing this would be well spent.


To cut down on the amount of work, we're considering changing only the 
`python3.11` package (and any future newer versions) right now. If later we 
consider it worth it, we could switch the older alternative interpreters as 
well, or we might let them die out as they are.


We're currently in the brainstorming stage, so you're feedback is welcome.

[BZ#2063227] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063227


This is now in rawhide and updates testing, for Python 3.11.

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-69ac59
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-a6cb44ffeb
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-77db03acc5
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-be990fe88f

If all goes well, we plan to make Python 3.10 the same in Fedora 37 when the 
main Python will be 3.11.


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2022-05-03)

[Miro Hrončok]

===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2022-05-03)
===


Meeting started by mhroncok at 17:00:04 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-05-03/fesco.2022-05-03-17.00.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---
* init process  (mhroncok, 17:00:23)

* #2772 Change proposal: Drop i686 builds of jdk8,11,17 and latest (18)
  rpms from f37  (mhroncok, 17:04:33)

* Next week's chair  (mhroncok, 17:05:28)
  * ACTION: mhroncok will chair next meeting  (mhroncok, 17:05:40)

* Open Floor  (mhroncok, 17:05:48)

Meeting ended at 17:13:08 UTC.




Action Items

* mhroncok will chair next meeting




Action Items, by person
---
* mhroncok
  * mhroncok will chair next meeting
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---
* mhroncok (25)
* zodbot (11)
* nirik (4)
* mboddu (4)
* decathorpe (2)
* Eighth_Doctor (2)
* zbyszek (1)
* bcotton (1)
* sgallagh (0)
* dcantrell (0)
* tstellar (0)
* Conan_Kudo (0)
* Pharaoh_Atem (0)
* Son_Goku (0)
* King_InuYasha (0)
* Sir_Gallantmon (0)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Alexander Sosedkin]

On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 1:20 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
 wrote:
>
> Ian Pilcher wrote:
> > It sure feels like we're reaching the point where anyone who has to work
> > with any sort of older equipment or servers is going to to forced to
> > switch their entire system to the LEGACY policy, which seems really
> > unfortunate.
>
> Even worse is that even the LEGACY policy is getting stricter and stricter
> (more or less silently, because it is documented only in passing as part of
> the general crypto policy tightening, and the focus of the documentation is
> on DEFAULT).
>
> I think we need a REALLY_LEGACY that continues allowing MD5 and the like.

A resounding no from me.
If you want one, write a custom one
that's at least tailored to what exactly you want enabled.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2076894] Add perl-List-AllUtils to EPEL8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076894

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b98bbf4fb3 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b98bbf4fb3

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076894
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2081143] perl-Hash-Merge-Simple for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081143

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1909b3f616 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1909b3f616


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081143
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-36-20220503.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 7/229 (x86_64), 12/161 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220501.n.0):

ID: 1252415 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252415
ID: 1252431 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso base_service_manipulation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252431
ID: 1252474 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_repository_hd_variation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252474
ID: 1252480 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252480
ID: 1252485 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_role_deploy_database_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252485
ID: 1252491 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252491
ID: 1252495 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252495
ID: 1252496 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_database_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252496
ID: 1252530 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252530
ID: 1252639 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252639
ID: 1252682 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252682
ID: 1252819 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252819
ID: 1252820 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252820

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-36-20220501.n.0):

ID: 1252377 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252377
ID: 1252412 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252412
ID: 1252511 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gnome_text_editor@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252511
ID: 1252544 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252544
ID: 1252547 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252547
ID: 1252566 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252566

Soft failed openQA tests: 10/229 (x86_64), 5/161 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-36-20220501.n.0):

ID: 1252380 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252380
ID: 1252384 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252384
ID: 1252395 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso eog
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252395
ID: 1252405 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252405
ID: 1252422 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso eog
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252422
ID: 1252427 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252427
ID: 1252429 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252429
ID: 1252430 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252430
ID: 1252436 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252436
ID: 1252487 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252487
ID: 1252525 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252525
ID: 1252526 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz eog@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252526
ID: 1252538 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252538
ID: 1252560 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_browser@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252560
ID: 1252573 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade eog@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252573

Passed openQA tests: 144/161 (aarch64), 211/229 (x86_64)

New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-36-20220501.n.0):

ID: 1252457 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso support_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252457
ID: 1252486 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252486
ID: 1252535 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252535
ID: 

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Jeremy Linton]

Hi,

On 5/2/22 22:53, Chris Murphy wrote:

On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 5:29 PM Jeremy Linton  wrote:


On 4/6/22 12:57, Neal Gompa wrote:
(trimming)

* NVIDIA graphics
* Broadcom wireless

The former case is excessively common, and the latter case is fairly
common with HP and Dell machines as well as some smaller OEMs. I
literally helped someone this past week with both[1][2][3]. The
Workstation WG has been tracking both issues for years now[4][5]. This
situation is *worse* now because we have Fedora Linux preloaded on
computers, and OEMs basically have to disable Secure Boot to make
things "work". How's that for improving security?


I too have been a bit surprised at some of the difficulties of
hibernate/secure boot on recent fedora releases. It seems people are
entirely unaware that ACPI/S3 standby is gone from most consumer
laptops, and the modern standby replacement implementations tend to work
very poorly WRT conserving battery with the lid closed in Linux.


It's a kernel problem. I'm not sure to what degree upstream is aware
of it. But there's not a lot we can do about it except file bugs and
ask for improvement.




So, on a recent fedora machine, it took me more than 4 hours to get a
hibernation file on btrfs plus LUKS encrypted partition working. The
documentation for that wasn't to be found anywhere on the fedora/RH
sites and required compiling a tool to do the block offset calculations
and manually adding the resume_offset options to grub/etc. All while
avoiding the mass of incorrect information found on the internet. And of
course it also requires disabling swap on zram (which was nonsense on
the machine anyway, given the disks are faster than it can
compress/decompress pages).


I don't think it requires disabling swap on zram per se - from what
I've been told the hibernation code knows it can't use it for the
hibernation image, not least of which is it's not big enough for a
contiguous write of the image. The issue might be that so much needs
to be swapped out, to free ~50% RAM, which is used to create the
hibernation image in memory before it's written out. We need a clear
reproducer with logs and get it posted to the Linux memory management
mailing list to see what's going wrong. Since zram is threaded, it's
pretty unlikely drive writes are faster than memory writes with
compression. LZO+RLE is computationally pretty cheap.


DMA is computationally free. and at >3GB/sec on modern hw with 
sufficient queue depth or contiguous. And the RLE improvements only help 
when the page is basically empty. AKA its a great chrome benchmark tool, 
less so for real workloads.







And of course the lockdown patches in the kernel still aren't smart
enough to be able to detect that the swapfile is actually encrypted, so
it also requires disabling secure boot (this IMHO is frankly
unacceptable, that one can't have both options enabled at the same time).


Encryption isn't enough to ensure the image is valid. It needs to be
signed. But in any case this is also upstream effort required,
including discovering the offset via a standard API for all file
systems.


Yes, I'm aware much of this is a kernel problem, but the point being 
that in the meantime, most random machines people are buying at retail 
won't last more than a day or so without being plugged in using fedora, 
vs many days with windows because its hibernating with secure boot 
turned on.









So, this is really less about BIOS/EFI and more about some pretty basic
functionality being broken in the distro.




___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2080418] perl-Socket-2.033 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080418

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-e3049aff11 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-e3049aff11`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-e3049aff11

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080418
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 08:56:06AM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> It sure feels like we're reaching the point where anyone who has to work
> with any sort of older equipment or servers is going to to forced to
> switch their entire system to the LEGACY policy, which seems really
> unfortunate.

See also:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064740

Rich.

> IMO, there's a rather desperate need to be able to override the system-
> wide policy for individual processes, maybe via some sort of wrapper
> around one of the containerization technologies.
> 
> -- 
> 
> Google  Where SkyNet meets Idiocracy
> 
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

HEADS UP: podofo-0.9.8 coming to rawhide

[Sandro Mani]

Hi

I'm landing podofo 0.9.8 which carries a soname bump. I'll build it and 
rebuild the following dependent packages in f37-build-side-53387:


calibre
gimagereader
krename
pdfsign
scribus
vfrnav

Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Rawhide-20220503.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Minimal raw-xz armhfp

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** 
below

Failed openQA tests: 23/231 (x86_64), 22/161 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220502.n.0):

ID: 1251905 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_role_deploy_domain_controller **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251905
ID: 1251911 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_updates
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251911
ID: 1251913 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251913
ID: 1251954 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251954
ID: 1251958 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251958
ID: 1251979 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251979
ID: 1252001 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252001
ID: 1252013 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_update_cli@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252013
ID: 1252015 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_services_start@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252015
ID: 1252031 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252031
ID: 1252036 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_role_deploy_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252036
ID: 1252071 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252071
ID: 1252101 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252101
ID: 1252114 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252114
ID: 1252120 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252120
ID: 1252136 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_browser@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252136
ID: 1252142 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252142
ID: 1252175 Test: x86_64 universal support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252175
ID: 1252198 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252198
ID: 1252200 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252200
ID: 1252221 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252221
ID: 125 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/125
ID: 1252227 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252227
ID: 1252263 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252263
ID: 1252270 Test: aarch64 universal install_multi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252270
ID: 1252276 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252276

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220502.n.0):

ID: 1251951 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251951
ID: 1251986 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251986
ID: 1251989 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251989
ID: 1252028 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252028
ID: 1252030 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252030
ID: 1252037 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252037
ID: 1252039 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252039
ID: 1252056 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252056
ID: 1252067 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252067
ID: 1252087 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gnome_text_editor@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252087
ID: 1252123 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252123
ID: 1252128 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_fprint
URL: 

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Clemens Lang]

Hi,

Kevin Kofler via devel  wrote:


I think we need a REALLY_LEGACY that continues allowing MD5 and the like.


According to https://github.com/corkami/collisions#chosen-prefix-collisions,
a chosen-prefix collision on MD5 took 72 hours to compute in 2009. 13 years
later, you really should treat anything that still uses MD5 as if it was
completely unsigned. I’m almost tempted to invest some CPU/GPU time to
compute a MD5 hash collision of your message to prove the point.

I don’t believe this would be in the best interest of our users. Setting a
crypto-policy to REALLY_LEGACY would basically mean “I don’t care about
encryption”. In these cases, why not just use plain HTTP, or other
unencrypted protocols instead?


--
Clemens Lang
RHEL Crypto Team
Red Hat


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora 36 compose report: 20220503.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-36-20220501.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220503.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   6
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   730.07 MiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   70.43 KiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: KDE raw-xz aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/images/Fedora-KDE-36-20220503.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  kernel-5.17.5-300.fc36
Old package:  kernel-5.17.3-302.fc36
Summary:  The Linux kernel
RPMs: kernel kernel-core kernel-debug kernel-debug-core 
kernel-debug-devel kernel-debug-devel-matched kernel-debug-modules 
kernel-debug-modules-extra kernel-debug-modules-internal kernel-devel 
kernel-devel-matched kernel-doc kernel-lpae kernel-lpae-core kernel-lpae-devel 
kernel-lpae-devel-matched kernel-lpae-modules kernel-lpae-modules-extra 
kernel-lpae-modules-internal kernel-modules kernel-modules-extra 
kernel-modules-internal
Size: 679.92 MiB
Size change:  101.34 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Apr 20 2022 Justin M. Forbes  [5.17.4-0]
  - Add F34 and F35 as release targets (Justin M. Forbes)
  - Revert "net: bcmgenet: Use stronger register read/writes to assure 
ordering" (Justin M. Forbes)

  * Thu Apr 28 2022 Justin M. Forbes  [5.17.5-0]
  - Linux v5.17.5

  * Thu Apr 28 2022 Justin M. Forbes  [5.17.5-300]
  - Update changelog (Justin M. Forbes)


Package:  selinux-policy-36.8-1.fc36
Old package:  selinux-policy-36.7-1.fc36
Summary:  SELinux policy configuration
RPMs: selinux-policy selinux-policy-devel selinux-policy-doc 
selinux-policy-minimum selinux-policy-mls selinux-policy-sandbox 
selinux-policy-targeted
Size: 20.04 MiB
Size change:  7.08 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Apr 26 2022 Zdenek Pytela  - 36.8-1
  - Allow nm-dispatcher chronyc plugin append to init stream sockets
  - Allow tmpreaper the sys_ptrace userns capability
  - Label /usr/libexec/vdsm/supervdsmd and vdsmd with virtd_exec_t
  - Allow nm-dispatcher tlp plugin read/write the wireless device
  - Allow nm-dispatcher tlp plugin append to init socket
  - Allow nm-dispatcher tlp plugin be client of a system bus
  - Allow nm-dispatcher list its configuration directory
  - Ecryptfs-private support
  - Allow colord map /var/lib directories
  - Allow ntlm_auth read the network state information
  - Allow insights-client search rhnsd configuration directory


Package:  snapper-0.10.1-1.fc36
Old package:  snapper-0.8.16-4.fc35
Summary:  Tool for filesystem snapshot management
RPMs: pam_snapper snapper snapper-devel snapper-libs snapper-tests
Size: 4.89 MiB
Size change:  247.57 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Jan 22 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.8.16-5
  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild

  * Thu Apr 28 2022 Neal Gompa  - 0.10.1-1
  - Rebase to 0.10.1


Package:  sssd-2.7.0-1.fc36
Old package:  sssd-2.6.3-1.fc36
Summary:  System Security Services Daemon
RPMs: libipa_hbac libipa_hbac-devel libsss_autofs libsss_certmap 
libsss_certmap-devel libsss_idmap libsss_idmap-devel libsss_nss_idmap 
libsss_nss_idmap-devel libsss_simpleifp libsss_simpleifp-devel libsss_sudo 
python3-libipa_hbac python3-libsss_nss_idmap python3-sss python3-sss-murmur 
python3-sssdconfig sssd sssd-ad sssd-client sssd-common sssd-common-pac 
sssd-dbus sssd-idp sssd-ipa sssd-kcm sssd-krb5 sssd-krb5-common sssd-ldap 
sssd-nfs-idmap sssd-proxy sssd-tools sssd-winbind-idmap
Added RPMs:   sssd-idp
Size: 20.33 MiB
Size change:  -216.42 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Apr 14 2022 Pavel B??ezina  - 2.7.0-1
  - Rebase to SSSD 2.7.0


Package:  xdg-desktop-portal-1.12.4-1.fc36
Old package:  xdg-desktop-portal-1.12.3-1.fc36
Summary:  Portal frontend service to flatpak
RPMs: xdg-desktop-portal xdg-desktop-portal-devel
Size: 2.24 MiB
Size change:  3.42 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Apr 05 2022 Debarshi Ray  - 1.12.3-2
  - Fix the GLib dependency

  * Sat Apr 16 2022 David King  - 1.12.4-1
  - Update to 1.12.4


Package:  xz-5.2.5-9.fc36
Old package:  xz-5.2.5-8.fc36
Summary:  LZMA compression utilities
RPMs: xz xz-devel xz-libs xz-lzma-compat xz-static
Size: 2.66 MiB
Size change:  -72.56 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Apr 16 2022 Todd Zullinger  - 5.2.5-9
  - verify upstream GPG signature
  - xzgrep: arbitrary-file-write vulnerability (#2073310, CVE-2022-1271)



= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedorap

Fedora-IoT-36-20220503.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220429.0):

ID: 1252295 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252295
ID: 1252301 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252301

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220429.0):

ID: 1252293 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252293

Passed openQA tests: 15/15 (x86_64), 12/15 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Kevin Kofler via devel]

Ian Pilcher wrote:
> It sure feels like we're reaching the point where anyone who has to work
> with any sort of older equipment or servers is going to to forced to
> switch their entire system to the LEGACY policy, which seems really
> unfortunate.

Even worse is that even the LEGACY policy is getting stricter and stricter 
(more or less silently, because it is documented only in passing as part of 
the general crypto policy tightening, and the focus of the documentation is 
on DEFAULT).

I think we need a REALLY_LEGACY that continues allowing MD5 and the like.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220503.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220502.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220503.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  9
Dropped packages:9
Upgraded packages:   78
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  49.19 MiB
Size of dropped packages:348.98 KiB
Size of upgraded packages:   2.80 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   113.83 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker ppc64le
Path: 
Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20220503.n.0.ppc64le.tar.xz

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: koko-22.04-1.fc37
Summary: An Image gallery application
RPMs:koko koko-devel
Size:36.17 MiB

Package: ks-install-0-0.1.20220502git06d4402.fc37
Summary: Take a Fedora/CentOS/RHEL kickstart file and make a VM
RPMs:ks-install
Size:32.99 KiB

Package: ktrip-22.04-1.fc37
Summary: Public transport navigation, allows you to find journeys between 
specified locations, departures for a specific station and shows real-time 
delay and disruption information.
RPMs:ktrip
Size:342.66 KiB

Package: perl-Authen-WebAuthn-0.001-2.fc37
Summary: Library to add Web Authentication support to server applications
RPMs:perl-Authen-WebAuthn
Size:28.34 KiB

Package: plasma-mobile-sounds-0.1-1.fc37
Summary: Plasma Mobile Sound Theme
RPMs:plasma-mobile-sounds
Size:9.49 MiB

Package: plasma-settings-22.04-1.fc37
Summary: Convergent Plasma Mobile settings application
RPMs:plasma-settings
Size:2.41 MiB

Package: python-niaarm-0.1.6-1.fc37
Summary: A minimalistic framework for numerical association rule mining
RPMs:python-niaarm-doc python3-niaarm
Size:510.54 KiB

Package: python-sklearn-genetic-0.5.1-1.fc37
Summary: A genetic feature selection module for scikit-learn
RPMs:python-sklearn-genetic-doc python3-sklearn-genetic
Size:202.83 KiB

Package: rust-yansi-0.5.1-1.fc37
Summary: Dead simple ANSI terminal color painting library
RPMs:rust-yansi+default-devel rust-yansi-devel
Size:30.81 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: rust-cssparser-macros-0.6.0-6.fc36
Summary: Procedural macros for cssparser
RPMs:rust-cssparser-macros+default-devel rust-cssparser-macros-devel
Size:23.06 KiB

Package: rust-delta_e-0.2.1-12.fc36
Summary: DeltaE is a pure-Rust implementation of the CIEDE2000 algorithm
RPMs:rust-delta_e+default-devel rust-delta_e-devel
Size:22.18 KiB

Package: rust-dns-parser-0.8.0-8.fc36
Summary: Pure-rust DNS protocol parser library
RPMs:rust-dns-parser+default-devel rust-dns-parser+serde-devel 
rust-dns-parser+serde_derive-devel rust-dns-parser+with-serde-devel 
rust-dns-parser-devel
Size:64.64 KiB

Package: rust-dtoa-short-0.3.3-4.fc36
Summary: Serialize float number and truncate to certain precision
RPMs:rust-dtoa-short+default-devel rust-dtoa-short-devel
Size:24.45 KiB

Package: rust-enum_primitive-0.1.1-13.fc36
Summary: Macro to generate num::FromPrimitive instances for enum that works in 
Rust 1.0
RPMs:rust-enum_primitive+default-devel rust-enum_primitive-devel
Size:21.45 KiB

Package: rust-errln-0.1.0-12.fc36
Summary: Utility macros to write to stderr
RPMs:rust-errln+default-devel rust-errln-devel
Size:18.56 KiB

Package: rust-euclid-0.22.6-3.fc36
Summary: Geometry primitives
RPMs:rust-euclid+arbitrary-devel rust-euclid+default-devel 
rust-euclid+libm-devel rust-euclid+mint-devel rust-euclid+serde-devel 
rust-euclid+std-devel rust-euclid+unstable-devel rust-euclid-devel
Size:125.43 KiB

Package: rust-extend-0.1.2-8.fc36
Summary: Create extensions for types you don't own
RPMs:rust-extend+default-devel rust-extend-devel
Size:26.98 KiB

Package: rust-extprim_literals_macros-2.0.3-12.fc36
Summary: Internal crate to support `extprim_literals`
RPMs:rust-extprim_literals_macros+default-devel 
rust-extprim_literals_macros-devel
Size:22.23 KiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  awscli-1.23.5-1.fc37
Old package:  awscli-1.23.4-1.fc37
Summary:  Universal Command Line Environment for AWS
RPMs: awscli
Size: 2.17 MiB
Size change:  -77 B
Changelog:
  * Mon May 02 2022 Gwyn Ciesla  - 1.23.5-1
  - 1.23.5


Package:  azure-cli-2.36.0-2.fc37
Old package:  azure-cli-2.36.0-1.fc37
Summary:  Microsoft Azure Command-Line Tools
RPMs: azure-cli python3-azure-cli-core python3-azure-cli-telemetry 
python3-azure-cli-testsdk
Size: 4.01 MiB
Size change:  122 B
Changelog:
  * Mon May 02 2022 Major Hayden  2.36.0-2
  - Get required Python packages from setup.py files


Package:  baresip-2.3.0-1.fc37
Old package:  baresip-2.0.2-1.fc37
Summary:  Modular SIP user-agent with audio and video support
RPMs: baresip baresip-aac baresip-alsa baresip-av1 baresip-codec2 
baresip-ctrl_dbus baresip-g722 baresip-g726 baresip-gsm baresip-gst 
baresip-gst_video baresip

[Test-Announce] Fedora-IoT 36 RC 20220503.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

[rawhide]

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 36 RC 20220503.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan

Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/testcase_stats/36iot

You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
locations, and enter results on the Summary page:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora-IoT_36_RC_20220503.0_Summary

The individual test result pages are:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora-IoT_36_RC_20220503.0_General

Thank you for testing!
-- 
Mail generated by relvalconsumer: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relvalconsumer
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-IoT-37-20220503.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 4/15 (aarch64)

ID: 1251815 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251815
ID: 1251817 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251817
ID: 1251823 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251823
ID: 1251828 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251828

Passed openQA tests: 15/15 (x86_64), 11/15 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2072968] Review Request: perl-Alien-libmaxminddb - Find libmaxminddb

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072968

Michal Josef Spacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||mspa...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mspa...@redhat.com




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072968
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2078464] Add perl-List-UtilsBy to EPEL8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078464

Michal Josef Spacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-List-UtilsBy-0.11-14.e
   ||l8




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078464
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2081264] foo/* glob in %files sometimes packages the directory and sometimes does not

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081264

Panu Matilainen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|rpm |perl-Test-Fake-HTTPD
 CC||de...@fateyev.com
   Assignee|mdomo...@redhat.com |de...@fateyev.com



--- Comment #4 from Panu Matilainen  ---
> %{perl_privlib} expands to "/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl".

Except that it doesn't, at least here on F35:

[pmatilai︎localhost]$ rpm --eval "%{perl_privlib}"
/usr/share/perl5
[pmatilai︎localhost]$ rpm --eval "%{perl_vendorlib}"
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl

And that's why %{perl_privlib}/* ends up packaging
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl. I don't know the alleged difference between
%{perl_privlib} and %{perl_vendorlib} but this is not an rpm bug, this is a
packaging issue.

Reassigning to perl-Test-Fake-HTTPD but if more packages are using
%{perl_privlib} when they should be using %{perl_vendorlib} then then maybe
there's a more generic issue, maybe one with packaging guidelines?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081264
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2081264] foo/* glob in %files sometimes packages the directory and sometimes does not

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081264

Michal Domonkos  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mdomo...@redhat.com
   Assignee|packaging-team-maint@redhat |mdomo...@redhat.com
   |.com|



--- Comment #3 from Michal Domonkos  ---
Yeah, %files globbing is janky at the moment, we have a PR pending that should
help with that, although it remains to be seen if this is related.  Assigning
to self as I'm currently looking into that piece of code anyway.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081264
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2081264] foo/* glob in %files sometimes packages the directory and sometimes does not

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081264



--- Comment #2 from Panu Matilainen  ---
Indeed /path/* should not package /path itself, so something's amiss here. 
Good spotting, thanks for the report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081264
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2081264] foo/* glob in %files sometimes packages the directory and sometimes does not

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081264

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||perl-devel@lists.fedoraproj
   ||ect.org



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
Compare to perl-HTTP-Message-6.36-2.fc37 has a very similar %files section:

%files
%license LICENSE
%doc Changes CONTRIBUTING.md README.md
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*

but the /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl directory is not packaged:

$ rpm -qlp noarch/perl-HTTP-Message-6.36-2.fc37.noarch.rpm | sort   
/usr/share/doc/perl-HTTP-Message
/usr/share/doc/perl-HTTP-Message/Changes
/usr/share/doc/perl-HTTP-Message/CONTRIBUTING.md
/usr/share/doc/perl-HTTP-Message/README.md
/usr/share/licenses/perl-HTTP-Message
/usr/share/licenses/perl-HTTP-Message/LICENSE
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Config.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Headers.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Headers::Auth.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Headers::ETag.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Headers::Util.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Message.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Request.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Request::Common.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Response.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Status.3pm.gz
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Config.pm
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Headers
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Headers/Auth.pm
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Headers/ETag.pm
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Headers.pm
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Headers/Util.pm
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Message.pm
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Request
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Request/Common.pm
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Request.pm
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Response.pm
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Status.pm

I found that many Perl packages now package that directory and they should not.
At least that is not in intention of current Perl packaging guidelines
.
This is how I discovered this issue.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081264
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2076894] Add perl-List-AllUtils to EPEL8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076894

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-List-AllUtils-0.18-2.e
   ||l8




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076894
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: A way to prepare custom source tarballs from .spec file to improve CI experience

[Miroslav Suchý]

Dne 26. 04. 22 v 12:40 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):

Dne 25. 04. 22 v 10:41 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):

We already have signature of source files as additional source.

Do you mean the 'sources' file?


I mean 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_verifying_signatures

Miroslav
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2081143] perl-Hash-Merge-Simple for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081143

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth  ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/44142


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081143
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2081210] perl-PDL-2.079 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081210

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 CC|caillon+fedoraproject@gmail |
   |.com,   |
   |jakub.jedel...@gmail.com,   |
   |jples...@redhat.com,|
   |ka...@ucw.cz,   |
   |lkund...@v3.sk, |
   |rhug...@redhat.com, |
   |rstr...@redhat.com, |
   |sandm...@redhat.com,|
   |tjczep...@gmail.com |




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081210
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-36-20220502.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 6/229 (x86_64), 7/161 (aarch64)

ID: 1251048 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251048
ID: 1251053 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso evince
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251053
ID: 1251083 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251083
ID: 1251158 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251158
ID: 1251182 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gnome_text_editor@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251182
ID: 1251215 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251215
ID: 1251218 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251218
ID: 1251237 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251237
ID: 1251275 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_btrfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251275
ID: 1251335 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251335
ID: 1251345 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251345
ID: 1251355 Test: aarch64 universal install_scsi_updates_img@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251355
ID: 1251358 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251358

Soft failed openQA tests: 10/229 (x86_64), 5/161 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

ID: 1251051 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251051
ID: 1251055 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251055
ID: 1251066 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso eog
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251066
ID: 1251076 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251076
ID: 1251093 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso eog
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251093
ID: 1251098 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251098
ID: 1251100 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251100
ID: 1251101 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251101
ID: 1251107 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251107
ID: 1251196 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251196
ID: 1251197 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz eog@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251197
ID: 1251201 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251201
ID: 1251209 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251209
ID: 1251231 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_browser@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251231
ID: 1251244 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade eog@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251244

Passed openQA tests: 213/229 (x86_64), 148/161 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure