[Bug 2080452] perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080452 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07-1.f |perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07-1.f |c37 |c37 |perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07-1.f |perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07-1.f |c35 |c35 ||perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07-1.f ||c34 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-d3f93c62b5 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080452 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2080452] perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080452 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07-1.f |perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07-1.f |c37 |c37 ||perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07-1.f ||c35 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2022-05-01 15:26:41 |2022-05-30 05:34:24 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-3d64d62de3 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080452 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F37 proposal: Install Using GPT on x86_64 BIOS by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 6:56 AM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > > Am 14.05.2022 um 18:45 schrieb Ben Cotton : > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GPTforBIOSbyDefault > > > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > > process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive > > community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved > > by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee. > > > > == Summary == > > This Change makes it so that Fedora Linux systems installed on legacy > > x86 BIOS systems will get GPT partitioning by default instead of > > legacy MBR partitioning. This makes x86 BIOS installs more similar to > > x86 UEFI installs. > > > > == Owner == > > * Name: [[User:Ngompa| Neal Gompa]], [[User:Dcavalca| Davide > > Cavalca]], [[User:Salimma| Michel Alexandre Salim]], > > [[User:Chrismurphy| Chris Murphy]] > > * Email: ngomp...@gmail.com, dcava...@fb.com, mic...@michel-slm.name, > > chrismur...@fedoraproject.org > > > > > > == Detailed Description == > > Once implemented, Anaconda will create a GPT disk table on > > non-partitioned disks or when the disk is being completely reset when > > Fedora x86 install/live media is booted in BIOS mode. > > Fedora Server WG discussed the proposal and insists that the proposal be > deferred until Anaconda can install software raid on biosboot systems with > GPT (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088113 and > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ser...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/VSM473WRHKIIIJYZZCVXAO7XFS4ACHPH/) > - at least for Fedora Server where software raid is a common use. What's the basis for holding up this feature though? Yes it's a bug, but it wouldn't be a release blocking bug because there's no release criteria covering degraded boot. And on UEFI we already have this problem because multiple ESPs aren't created or populated (sync'd). I think it's a worthwhile use case to improve the current behavior so that it works, but I don't think it's OK to hold up a release indefinitely while insisting other people do the work required to bring such functionality to Fedora. -- Chris Murphy ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2091432] perl-Number-Tolerant-1.709 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091432 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Number-Tolerant-1.709-1.fc34.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=87661875 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091432 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2091432] New: perl-Number-Tolerant-1.709 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091432 Bug ID: 2091432 Summary: perl-Number-Tolerant-1.709 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Number-Tolerant Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.709 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.708-19.fc36 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Number-Tolerant/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/6576/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091432 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2091432] perl-Number-Tolerant-1.709 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091432 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1884912 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1884912=edit Update to 1.709 (#2091432) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091432 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2091430] New: perl-MooseX-OneArgNew-0.006 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091430 Bug ID: 2091430 Summary: perl-MooseX-OneArgNew-0.006 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-MooseX-OneArgNew Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: emman...@seyman.fr, iarn...@gmail.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.006 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.005-19.fc36 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-OneArgNew/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/12549/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091430 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Cannot report selinux bug...
I was told to report an selinux bug. I clicked the report bug button and was asked for my API key. Then I created the API key and plugged that in and hit OK. Now I am being asked to unlock a keyring (?) with the name "default". It is not locked with my password. I'm on KDE. Is this "default" a gnome thing? If so how do I set it up under KDE. Then I can get back to reporting the selinux bug. Barry ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Rawhide-20220529.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 10/231 (x86_64), 13/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220528.n.0): ID: 1283030 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso anaconda_help URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283030 ID: 1283039 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283039 ID: 1283054 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283054 ID: 1283056 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso anaconda_help URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283056 ID: 1283066 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283066 ID: 1283120 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283120 ID: 1283131 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283131 ID: 1283156 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283156 ID: 1283169 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283169 ID: 1283226 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_printing@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283226 ID: 1283231 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_terminal@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283231 ID: 1283357 Test: aarch64 universal install_blivet_lvmthin@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283357 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220528.n.0): ID: 1283064 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283064 ID: 1283069 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283069 ID: 1283118 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283118 ID: 1283149 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283149 ID: 1283151 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283151 ID: 1283206 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283206 ID: 1283207 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_fprint URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283207 ID: 1283222 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283222 ID: 1283239 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283239 ID: 1283315 Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283315 ID: 1283355 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283355 Soft failed openQA tests: 7/231 (x86_64), 7/161 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220528.n.0): ID: 1283036 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso eog URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283036 ID: 1283089 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso gnome_text_editor URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283089 ID: 1283125 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283125 ID: 1283362 Test: aarch64 universal install_serial_console@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283362 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220528.n.0): ID: 1283082 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283082 ID: 1283083 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso eog URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283083 ID: 1283088 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283088 ID: 1283097 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283097 ID: 1283112 Test: aarch64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283112 ID: 1283191 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283191 ID: 1283232 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade eog@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283232 ID: 1283288 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283288 ID: 1283314 Test: aarch64 universal install_anaconda_text@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1283314 ID: 1283344 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_64bit@uefi URL:
Re: F37 proposal: Install Using GPT on x86_64 BIOS by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)
> Am 14.05.2022 um 18:45 schrieb Ben Cotton : > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GPTforBIOSbyDefault > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive > community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved > by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee. > > == Summary == > This Change makes it so that Fedora Linux systems installed on legacy > x86 BIOS systems will get GPT partitioning by default instead of > legacy MBR partitioning. This makes x86 BIOS installs more similar to > x86 UEFI installs. > > == Owner == > * Name: [[User:Ngompa| Neal Gompa]], [[User:Dcavalca| Davide > Cavalca]], [[User:Salimma| Michel Alexandre Salim]], > [[User:Chrismurphy| Chris Murphy]] > * Email: ngomp...@gmail.com, dcava...@fb.com, mic...@michel-slm.name, > chrismur...@fedoraproject.org > > > == Detailed Description == > Once implemented, Anaconda will create a GPT disk table on > non-partitioned disks or when the disk is being completely reset when > Fedora x86 install/live media is booted in BIOS mode. Fedora Server WG discussed the proposal and insists that the proposal be deferred until Anaconda can install software raid on biosboot systems with GPT (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088113 and https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ser...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/VSM473WRHKIIIJYZZCVXAO7XFS4ACHPH/) - at least for Fedora Server where software raid is a common use. The issue is known to all server WG members at least since F32 and is mentioned in the server user documentation. A hybrid boot configuration may be useful for cloud because the same image is to be used for different runtime environments. For physical servers it is irrelevant and for VMs in a libvirt virtualization it is completely pointless. It would only introduce an additional potential source of errors for Fedora servers, without any benefit at all. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220529.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220528.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220529.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 32 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 294.63 MiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 4.98 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Workstation live ppc64le Path: Workstation/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-ppc64le-Rawhide-20220528.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: GitPython-3.1.27-1.fc37 Old package: GitPython-3.1.26-1.fc37 Summary: Python Git Library RPMs: python3-GitPython Size: 275.45 KiB Size change: 218 B Changelog: * Sat May 28 2022 Kevin Fenzi - 3.1.27-1 - Update to 3.1.27. Fixes rhbz#2056218 Package: atari800-5.0.0-1.fc37 Old package: atari800-4.2.0-4.fc36 Summary: An emulator of 8-bit Atari personal computers RPMs: atari800 Size: 2.06 MiB Size change: 108.26 KiB Changelog: * Sat May 28 2022 J??n ONDREJ (SAL) - 5.0.0-1 - Update to upstream. Package: binutils-2.38-14.fc37 Old package: binutils-2.38-13.fc37 Summary: A GNU collection of binary utilities RPMs: binutils binutils-devel binutils-gold Size: 74.48 MiB Size change: 379.72 KiB Changelog: * Fri May 27 2022 Nick Clifton - 2.38-14 - Fix bug in binutils.spec file that was causing the wrong linker flags to be used. Package: cinnamon-desktop-5.2.1-1.fc37 Old package: cinnamon-desktop-5.2.0-2.fc36 Summary: Shared code among cinnamon-session, nemo, etc RPMs: cinnamon-desktop cinnamon-desktop-devel Size: 1.20 MiB Size change: -1.94 KiB Changelog: * Sat May 28 2022 Leigh Scott - 5.2.1-1 - Update to 5.2.1 release Package: cinnamon-screensaver-5.2.1-1.fc37 Old package: cinnamon-screensaver-5.2.0-2.fc36 Summary: Cinnamon Screensaver RPMs: cinnamon-screensaver Size: 704.79 KiB Size change: -1.55 KiB Changelog: * Sat May 28 2022 Leigh Scott - 5.2.1-1 - Update to 5.2.1 release Package: dummy-test-package-gloster-0-8852.fc37 Old package: dummy-test-package-gloster-0-8836.fc37 Summary: Dummy Test Package called Gloster RPMs: dummy-test-package-gloster Size: 499.50 KiB Size change: 569 B Changelog: * Sat May 28 2022 packagerbot - 0-8837 - rebuilt * Sat May 28 2022 packagerbot - 0-8838 - rebuilt * Sat May 28 2022 packagerbot - 0-8839 - rebuilt * Sat May 28 2022 packagerbot - 0-8840 - rebuilt * Sat May 28 2022 packagerbot - 0-8841 - rebuilt * Sat May 28 2022 packagerbot - 0-8842 - rebuilt * Sat May 28 2022 packagerbot - 0-8843 - rebuilt * Sat May 28 2022 packagerbot - 0-8844 - rebuilt * Sat May 28 2022 packagerbot - 0-8845 - rebuilt * Sat May 28 2022 packagerbot - 0-8846 - rebuilt * Sat May 28 2022 packagerbot - 0-8847 - rebuilt * Sat May 28 2022 packagerbot - 0-8848 - rebuilt * Sat May 28 2022 packagerbot - 0-8849 - rebuilt * Sun May 29 2022 packagerbot - 0-8850 - rebuilt * Sun May 29 2022 packagerbot - 0-8851 - rebuilt * Sun May 29 2022 packagerbot - 0-8852 - rebuilt Package: gnome-shell-42.2-1.fc37 Old package: gnome-shell-42.1-1.fc37 Summary: Window management and application launching for GNOME RPMs: gnome-shell Size: 6.61 MiB Size change: -13.00 KiB Changelog: * Sat May 28 2022 Florian M??llner - 42.2-1 - Update to 42.2 Package: gnome-shell-extensions-42.2-1.fc37 Old package: gnome-shell-extensions-42.1-1.fc37 Summary: Modify and extend GNOME Shell functionality and behavior RPMs: gnome-classic-session gnome-shell-extension-apps-menu gnome-shell-extension-auto-move-windows gnome-shell-extension-common gnome-shell-extension-drive-menu gnome-shell-extension-launch-new-instance gnome-shell-extension-native-window-placement gnome-shell-extension-places-menu gnome-shell-extension-screenshot-window-sizer gnome-shell-extension-user-theme gnome-shell-extension-window-list gnome-shell-extension-windowsNavigator gnome-shell-extension-workspace-indicator Size: 334.68 KiB Size change: 1.01 KiB Changelog: * Fri May 27 2022 Florian M??llner - 42.2-1 - Update to 42.2 Package: grpc-1.46.3-3.fc37 Old package: grpc-1.46.3-2.fc37 Summary: RPC library and framework RPMs: grpc grpc-cli grpc-cpp grpc-data grpc-devel grpc-doc grpc-plugins python3-grpcio python3-grpcio+protobuf python3-grpcio-admin python3-grpcio-channelz python3-grpcio-csds python3-grpcio-health-checking python3-grpcio-reflection python3-grpcio-status python3-grpcio-testing python3-grpcio-tools Size: 27.47 MiB Size change: 676 B Changelog: * Fri May 27 2022
Fedora-Cloud-34-20220529.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220528.0): ID: 1282957 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1282957 ID: 1282965 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1282965 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-IoT-36-20220529.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220523.0): ID: 1282931 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1282931 ID: 1282938 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1282938 ID: 1282939 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1282939 ID: 1282946 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1282946 ID: 1282953 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1282953 Passed openQA tests: 13/15 (x86_64), 12/15 (aarch64) Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi: System load changed from 0.02 to 0.15 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1276944#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1282925#downloads Installed system changes in test aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi: System load changed from 0.26 to 0.06 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1276959#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1282940#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)
On 29/05/2022 02:57, Gerald Henriksen wrote: There is no indication that the JDK is such a thing - in fact given the packagers are struggling that is a good indication that the JDK is being regularly updated. Every 3 months in a patch release. I don't think maintainers will manually backport patches to the bundled libraries. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-36-20220529.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220528.0): ID: 1282911 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1282911 ID: 1282919 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1282919 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 2:57 AM Gerald Henriksen wrote: > > On Sat, 28 May 2022 20:52:51 +0200, you wrote: > > >On 28/05/2022 19:31, drago01 wrote: > >> That's incorrect. They can be outdated, but there is no inherit reason > >> why they have to be. > > > >Most upstreams don't care about bundled libraries. They bundle them once > >and then forget. > > But most != all as you claimed. > > There is no indication that the JDK is such a thing - in fact given > the packagers are struggling that is a good indication that the JDK is > being regularly updated. It could also imply the opposite (that is, the bundled libraries are *not* being updated), if TCK failures are occurring simply because we're dynamically linking those libraries. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
