[Bug 2099988] Please branch and build perl-Parallel-ForkManager in epel9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099988



--- Comment #1 from Ralf Brunckhorst  ---
Any updates on this?

/Ralf


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099988
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: percona-xtrabackup bundling the kitchen sink in static libs

[Otto Liljalaakso]

Paul Wouters kirjoitti 23.8.2022 klo 3.07:


Hi,

I looked at fixing percona-xtrabackup and noticed it is staticly linking
to a bunch of libraries. These .a files are then removed in %install so
they are not shipped. It bundles a bunch of this stuff from its extra/ dir:

duktape  googletest  icu  libcbor  libedit  libevent  libfido2  libkmip  
lz4  protobuf  rapidjson  robin-hood-hashing  zlib  zstd


On top of that, it pins boost to a specific (older!) version and bundles 
boost

seperate via dist-git / sources :(


The relevant policy is Bundled software policy [1]. Unlike in the past, 
a package does not need a FESCo exception to bundle dependencies. 
However, the requirements of that policy are not being met here: The 
reason for bundling should be recorded in the specfile, and Provides: 
bundled(x) = 1.2.3 should be included.


[1]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Bundled_Software_policy/


I've just fixed it up in the same bad way, making it link to the old
openssl just to get it past F35FailsToInstall for rhbz#1989019. It is
going through rawhide and the branches now. But I think perhaps this
package should be removed from rawhide.

This package clearly breaks a lot of packaging rules, so I was
wondering if there was ever any exception of some kind given to this
package? I will definitely look at $dayjob migrating away from this,
eg see if myhoard or mariabackup can be used instead.

Any feedback would be appreciated, as it seems the maintainer is MIA.


If the maintainer is not responding, you should invoke the 
Non-responsive maintainer policy [2]. This package has CVE bugs open 
[3], so most probably it should eith be retired, or somebody should 
start caring for it.


[2]: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/
[3]: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW_status=ASSIGNED=Fedora=percona-xtrabackup=Fedora=Fedora%20EPEL

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
  34  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-89ad385971   
chromium-103.0.5060.114-1.el8


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing

fastfetch-1.6.4-3.el8
imapsync-2.200-1.el8
pam_radius-2.0.0-2.el8
python-colcon-rerun-0.0.1-1.el8

Details about builds:



 fastfetch-1.6.4-3.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e744c90f60)
 Like neofetch, but much faster because written in c

Update Information:

add support for package detection    initial package build

ChangeLog:

* Mon Aug 22 2022 Jonathan Wright  - 1.6.4-3
- Compile with rpm support for listing package counts
* Mon Aug 22 2022 Jonathan Wright  - 1.6.4-2
- Fix spec for EPEL8 builds
* Tue Aug 16 2022 Jonathan Wright  - 1.6.4-1
- Initial package build
- khbz#2118887




 imapsync-2.200-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2ef6bc66d6)
 Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers

Update Information:

Update to 2.200

ChangeLog:

* Sun Aug 21 2022 Jonathan Wright  - 2.200-1
- Update to 2.200
- Update URL
- Misc minor spec modernization
* Thu Jul 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
2.140-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild




 pam_radius-2.0.0-2.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-08e79dfa59)
 PAM Module for RADIUS Authentication

Update Information:

pam_radius_auth: stop printing password

ChangeLog:

* Mon Aug 22 2022 Iker Pedrosa  - 2.0.0-2
- pam_radius_auth: stop printing password




 python-colcon-rerun-0.0.1-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ddc9838041)
 Extension for colcon to quickly re-run a recently executed verb

Update Information:

Initial build of `python-colcon-rerun`.

ChangeLog:

* Wed Mar 16 2022 Scott K Logan  - 0.0.1-1
- Initial package (rhbz#2064943)

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2064943 - Review Request: python-colcon-rerun - Extension for 
colcon to quickly re-run a recently executed verb
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064943


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119903] Please branch and build perl-Net-Patricia for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119903

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-dc0bb994f4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-dc0bb994f4

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119903
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2120004] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20220820 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120004



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-8812197fab has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-8812197fab`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8812197fab

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120004
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119901] perl-Business-CreditCard-0.39 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119901



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-7cb6b062ff has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-7cb6b062ff`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-7cb6b062ff

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119901
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2120008] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20220820 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120008



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-1ba6349ff3 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-1ba6349ff3`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-1ba6349ff3

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120008
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2120008] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20220820 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120008

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-b0b60a5adc has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-b0b60a5adc`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-b0b60a5adc

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120008
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119882] perl-Socket-2.036 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119882

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-abcd05d959 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-abcd05d959`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-abcd05d959

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119882
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119994] perl-DateTime-Locale-1.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119994



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-8cc1dd31a1 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-8cc1dd31a1`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8cc1dd31a1

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119994
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2120004] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20220820 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120004

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-34c4578f7d has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-34c4578f7d`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-34c4578f7d

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120004
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119901] perl-Business-CreditCard-0.39 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119901

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-95464637b9 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-95464637b9`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-95464637b9

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119901
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: gsl soversion bump

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 09:23:51AM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote on 2022/08/23 5:54:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 12:08 PM Susi Lehtola
> >  wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > 
> > > gsl will be updated from version 2.6 to 2.7.1 which changes the
> > > soversion from .25 to .27 in one week. List of dependent packages
> > > 
> > > $ for rpm in $(repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide
> > > --whatrequires "libgsl.so.25()(64bit)"); do repoquery --disablerepo=*
> > > --enablerepo=rawhide --source $rpm;done|sort|uniq
> > > 
> > 
> > Did you just build directly in Rawhide after listing *61* packages
> > that would break from the update?
> > Please please use a side tag next time.
> > 
> 
> Untagging requested.
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10984

Untagged. You can make a side tag and tag it into there... 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: gsl soversion bump

[Mamoru TASAKA]

Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote on 2022/08/23 5:54:

On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 12:08 PM Susi Lehtola
 wrote:


Hello,


gsl will be updated from version 2.6 to 2.7.1 which changes the
soversion from .25 to .27 in one week. List of dependent packages

$ for rpm in $(repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide
--whatrequires "libgsl.so.25()(64bit)"); do repoquery --disablerepo=*
--enablerepo=rawhide --source $rpm;done|sort|uniq



Did you just build directly in Rawhide after listing *61* packages
that would break from the update?
Please please use a side tag next time.



Untagging requested.
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10984

Mamoru
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

java-latest-openjdk-18.0.2.0.9-1.rolling.el7
python-colcon-rerun-0.0.1-1.el7

Details about builds:



 java-latest-openjdk-18.0.2.0.9-1.rolling.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-21ae60f43a)
 OpenJDK 18 Runtime Environment

Update Information:

CPU update for JDK latest

ChangeLog:

* Fri Jul 22 2022 Andrew Hughes  - 1:18.0.2.0.9-1.rolling
- Update to jdk-18.0.2 release
- Update release notes to 18.0.2




 python-colcon-rerun-0.0.1-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1433a64143)
 Extension for colcon to quickly re-run a recently executed verb

Update Information:

Initial build of `python-colcon-rerun`.

ChangeLog:

* Wed Mar 16 2022 Scott K Logan  - 0.0.1-1
- Initial package (rhbz#2064943)

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2064943 - Review Request: python-colcon-rerun - Extension for 
colcon to quickly re-run a recently executed verb
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064943


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

percona-xtrabackup bundling the kitchen sink in static libs

[Paul Wouters]

Hi,

I looked at fixing percona-xtrabackup and noticed it is staticly linking
to a bunch of libraries. These .a files are then removed in %install so
they are not shipped. It bundles a bunch of this stuff from its extra/ dir:

duktape  googletest  icu  libcbor  libedit  libevent  libfido2  libkmip  lz4  
protobuf  rapidjson  robin-hood-hashing  zlib  zstd

On top of that, it pins boost to a specific (older!) version and bundles boost
seperate via dist-git / sources :(

I've just fixed it up in the same bad way, making it link to the old
openssl just to get it past F35FailsToInstall for rhbz#1989019. It is
going through rawhide and the branches now. But I think perhaps this
package should be removed from rawhide.

This package clearly breaks a lot of packaging rules, so I was
wondering if there was ever any exception of some kind given to this
package? I will definitely look at $dayjob migrating away from this,
eg see if myhoard or mariabackup can be used instead.

Any feedback would be appreciated, as it seems the maintainer is MIA.

Paul
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Wine/FAudio & self introduction.

[Jonathan Wright via devel]

Welcome to Fedora :)

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 5:53 PM Aaron Stern via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> Greetings all.
>
> My name is Aaron, I contribute packages for openSUSE (
> https://build.opensuse.org/users/ukbeast89) and am looking to help bring
> updates to wine and FAudio.
> I have already created a PR for FAudio (
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/FAudio/pull-request/2) as a way to get
> my feet wet with Fedora's way of packaging.
>
> If anyone has any questions about me or my experience in Linux, please ask.
>
> Regards. Aaron.
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>


-- 
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Wine/FAudio & self introduction.

[Aaron Stern via devel]

Greetings all. 

My name is Aaron, I contribute packages for openSUSE 
(https://build.opensuse.org/users/ukbeast89) and am looking to help bring 
updates to wine and FAudio.
I have already created a PR for FAudio 
(https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/FAudio/pull-request/2) as a way to get my 
feet wet with Fedora's way of packaging.

If anyone has any questions about me or my experience in Linux, please ask.

Regards. Aaron.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: SPDX migration progress

[Jilayne Lovejoy]

That would be a bit hard since a large number of the SPDX ids are the same as 
the Fedora short names. That being said, some of the more commonly found 
licenses are not the same. 

It might be interesting to see how many packages have had a license update 
since this change, which could indicate updating to SPDX, as well as updating 
the license information more generally, as we've seen some cases of already.

To be honest, I've been thinking more about how to efficiently deal with some 
of the "category" Fedora short names specifically (need more brainstorming on 
that), than overall progress. 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: ksh license change

[Jilayne Lovejoy]

looks good!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Poco soname bump in rawhide/f37

[Carl George]

The updates policy requires that you notify this list and the
maintainers whose packages depend on poco a week in advance.

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#_rawhide

I found out about this due to the mumble FailsToInstall bugs that were
filed earlier today.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120237
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120233

In the future, please follow the policy so everyone has a chance to
adapt to stuff like this in time. It's especially painful for this to
happen on the day before the change code completion deadline.

On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 9:40 PM Robin Lee  wrote:
>
> Poco 1.12.2 landed in rawhide/f37 with a soname bump.
>
> -robin
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



-- 
Carl George
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2120427] perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO-1.16 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120427



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO-1.16-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=91154013


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120427
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2120427] New: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO-1.16 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120427

Bug ID: 2120427
   Summary: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO-1.16 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: or...@nwra.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jakub.jedel...@gmail.com, or...@nwra.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
scitech-b...@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 1.16
Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.16
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.15-8.fc37
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Astro-FITS-CFITSIO/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/11580/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120427
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2120427] perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO-1.16 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120427



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1907023
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1907023=edit
Update to 1.16 (#2120427)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120427
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119903] Please branch and build perl-Net-Patricia for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119903

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-dc0bb994f4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-dc0bb994f4


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119903
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps

[Artur Frenszek-Iwicki]

Hey all, 

I have two packages which have been sitting in review for some time now:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095732
daniel-wikholm-segment16-fonts - collection of 3 font families.
Bit problematic because of missing license text, not having an official source 
website, nor a way to contact the author.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098373
gearhead2 - an RPG game, written in Pascal, using SDL1.2.
Fairly straight-forward. The prequel, gearhead1, is already in the repos, and 
the spec files are very similar.

If anyone could take a look at one of these, I'd be grateful.
I'm willing to review some C, C++, Pascal or shell stuff in return.

A.FI.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: gsl soversion bump

[Elliott Sales de Andrade]

On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 12:08 PM Susi Lehtola
 wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> gsl will be updated from version 2.6 to 2.7.1 which changes the
> soversion from .25 to .27 in one week. List of dependent packages
>
> $ for rpm in $(repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide
> --whatrequires "libgsl.so.25()(64bit)"); do repoquery --disablerepo=*
> --enablerepo=rawhide --source $rpm;done|sort|uniq
>

Did you just build directly in Rawhide after listing *61* packages
that would break from the update?
Please please use a side tag next time.

-- 
Elliott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2120413] New: perl-Locale-Maketext-1.32 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120413

Bug ID: 2120413
   Summary: perl-Locale-Maketext-1.32 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Locale-Maketext
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, mspa...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 1.32
Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.32
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.31-490.fc37
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Locale-Maketext/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3034/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Locale-Maketext


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120413
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

[Kevin Fenzi]

I just edited the f38 tag at Mon Aug 22 08:29:51 PM UTC 2022 to switch
to nspawn. 

If you have detected a issue that seems like it might be related to this
change, please file a releng ticket and we will dig into it. 

Thanks, 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] duplicates

[Madeline Reilly-Watson]

Hi,

We are getting this on many servers and so I was asked to report. Any ideas

Thank you


Update notice CEEA-2019:2270 (from epel7-centos7-x86_64) is broken, or a bad 
duplicate, skipping.



You should report this problem to the owner of the epel7-centos7-x86_64 
repository.



yum updateinfo -verbose

Loading "rhnplugin" plugin

Loading "fastestmirror" plugin

Loading "fusioninventory-agent" plugin Loading "tmprepo" plugin

Config

time: 0.046

*Note* Spacewalk repositories are not listed below. You must run this command 
as root to access Spacewalk repositories.

Yum version: 3.4.3

rpmdb time: 0.000

Setting up Package Sacks

updateinfo time: 0.000

Building updates object

Setting up Package Sacks

Setting up Package Sacks

up:Obs Init time: 0.000

up:simple updates time: 0.000

up:obs time: 0.000

up:condense time: 0.000

updates time: 0.006

updateinfo summary done

sudo yum updateinfo -verbose

[sudo] password for

Loading "rhnplugin" plugin

Loading "fastestmirror" plugin

Loading "fusioninventory-agent" plugin Loading "tmprepo" plugin

 Config

time: 0.045 This system is receiving updates from RHN Classic or Red

 Hat Satellite.

Looking for repo options for [main]

Looking for repo options for [centos7-x86_64] Repo 'centos7-x86_64'

setting option 'enabled' = '1'

Repo 'centos7-x86_64' setting option 'gpgcheck' = '1'

Repo 'centos7-x86_64' setting option 'timeout' = '120'

Looking for repo options for [main]

Looking for repo options for [centos7-x86_64-updates] Repo

centos7-x86_64-updates' setting option 'enabled' = '1'

Repo 'centos7-x86_64-updates' setting option 'gpgcheck' = '1'

Repo 'centos7-x86_64-updates' setting option 'timeout' = '120'

Looking for repo options for [main]

Looking for repo options for [centos7-x86_64-extras] Repo

 'centos7-x86_64-extras' setting option 'enabled' = '1'

Repo 'centos7-x86_64-extras' setting option 'gpgcheck' = '1'

Repo 'centos7-x86_64-extras' setting option 'timeout' = '120'

Looking for repo options for [main]

Looking for repo options for [epel7-centos7-x86_64] Repo

'epel7-centos7-x86_64' setting option 'enabled' = '1'

Repo 'epel7-centos7-x86_64' setting option 'gpgcheck' = '1'

Repo 'epel7-centos7-x86_64' setting option 'timeout' = '120'

Looking for repo options for [main]

Looking for repo options for [spacewalk29-client-centos7-x86_64]

Repo 'spacewalk29-client-centos7-x86_64' setting option 'enabled' = '1'

Repo 'spacewalk29-client-centos7-x86_64' setting option 'gpgcheck' = '1'

Repo 'spacewalk29-client-centos7-x86_64' setting option 'timeout' = '120'

Looking for repo options for [main]

Looking for repo options for [trasher-fusioninventory-agent] Repo

'trasher-fusioninventory-agent' setting option 'enabled' = '1'

Repo 'trasher-fusioninventory-agent' setting option 'gpgcheck' = '1'

Repo 'trasher-fusioninventory-agent' setting option 'timeout' = '120'

Looking for repo options for [main]

Looking for repo options for [openldap-tb] Repo 'openldap-tb'

setting option 'enabled' = '1'

Repo 'openldap-tb' setting option 'gpgcheck' = '1'

Repo 'openldap-tb' setting option 'timeout' = '120'

Yum version: 3.4.3

rpmdb time: 0.000

Setting up Package Sacks

Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile pkgsack time: 0.054

Duplicate of CEEA-2019:2270 differs in some fields:

<<< epel7-centos7-x86_64:issued

'2019-08-30 03:47:24'

===

'2019-01-30 00:08:00'

>>> centos7-x86_64:issued

Update notice CEEA-2019:2270 (from epel7-centos7-x86_64) is broken, or a bad 
duplicate, skipping.

You should report this problem to the owner of the epel7-centos7-x86_64 
repository.

To help pinpoint the issue, please attach the output of "yum updateinfo 
--verbose" to the report.

updateinfo time: 1.551

Building updates object

up:Obs Init time: 0.525

up:simple updates time: 0.011

up:obs time: 0.006

up:condense time: 0.000

updates time: 1.378

Updates Information Summary: updates

8 Security notice(s)

3 Bugfix notice(s)

1 Enhancement notice(s)

> > updateinfo summary done


Lynn Reilly-Watson
Systems Administrator, Information Security
P: 516-431-4441 x 3468
mreilly-wat...@lancerinsurance.com
www.lancerinsurance.com

[cid:image001.png@01D83548.71B5B1C0]

[cid:image002.png@01D83548.71B5B1C0]

 Core Specialty, through its subsidiary insurers, offers a diversified range of 
property,
casualty and marine insurance products for small to mid-sized companies.
Check out our website at www.corespecialty.com.



This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential 
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent 
responsible for delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail 
message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message 

Re: Packaging a cross-compilation environment (wasi-libc)

[Josh Stone]

On 8/22/22 5:35 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Jan Staněk:
> 
>> Hi list,
>> in order to be able to compile WASM natively on Fedora,
>> I'm trying to package wasi-libc[1] to provide the Web Assembly System
>> Interface.
>>
>> [1]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/wasi-libc
>>
>> My trouble is that this is in essence a cross-compilation environment,
>> and I have zero experience in trying to package these.
>> Also, I did not have much luck in trying to find any related
>> documentation.
> 
> Cc:ing Josh because Rust apparently already builds wasi-libc.
> 
> I doubt that right now, one static build of wasi-libc will be able to
> support both the Rust use cases and the NodeJS use case.  The versions
> will likely be different, and the WASI interfaces are still evolving.
> So if you package this separately, you probably should use paths with
> “nodejs” in the name.

It might be fine to share this, as long as you are not patching upstream
wasi-libc in some weird way. Rust's use is pretty minimal from vanilla
sources, and mostly only updated when we need compatibility to build
with a new Clang, in wasi-libc's Makefile "check-symbols" target.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Imagefactory always uses uefi to create the vm for image creation

[Peter Boy]

> Am 22.08.2022 um 18:03 schrieb Neal Gompa :
> 
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 11:57 AM Peter Boy  wrote:
>> 
> …..
> libvirt supports UEFI VMs just fine too. That said, you probably would
> want to make it a hybrid boot system to support both.
> 
> You can see how it's done in Fedora Cloud.
> 

Neal, I was just about to write you an email asking for support.

I have already tried this, and followed the cloud kickstart example. But 2 
problems:
a) BiosBoot does not work, despite the separate grub2 installation step.
b) The UEFI boot screen looks horrible.

Any idea about this?


Thanks
Peter






--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org

Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2)


Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
Fedora docs team contributor
Java developer and enthusiast


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Imagefactory always uses uefi to create the vm for image creation

[Peter Boy]

> Am 22.08.2022 um 18:12 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé :
> 
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 12:03:21PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 11:57 AM Peter Boy  wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Does anyone know how I can configure ImageFactory / OZ to use a BIOS VM  
>>> for image generation? Unfortunately I haven't found any documentation on 
>>> this.
>>> 
>>> ….
>> 
>> libvirt supports UEFI VMs just fine too. That said, you probably would
>> want to make it a hybrid boot system to support both.
> 
> Yes, ideally any cloud images will be built such that they can boot on
> both BIOS and UEFI, to maximise cloud compatibility.

I agree, and I tried that at first, but run into issues (see my previous post)

Just for clarification:
That ServerVM is dedicated not for use in the cloud. It lacks to many features 
for that usage. It is specifically a Fedora Server Edition workalike to be used 
as a VM in a Fedora Server Installation (or any other server) with libvirt/KVM 
and has some features which cloud images removed (because of cloud 
requirements). 

And *currently*, libvirt/KVM defaults to biosboot, therefore this needs to work 
flawlessly. 






___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 22. 08. 22 v 19:03 Michel Alexandre Salim napsal(a):



rubygem-asciidoctor-pdfabradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
fale, orphan, snecker
rubygem-chunky_png mmorsi, orphan, snecker 0 weeks ago
rubygem-css_parser abradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
fale, orphan, snecker
rubygem-font-awesome-rails abradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
fale, orphan, snecker
rubygem-prawn-icon abradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
fale, orphan, snecker
rubygem-prawn-manual_builder   abradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
fale, orphan, snecker
rubygem-prawn-svg  abradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
fale, orphan, snecker
rubygem-prawn-templatesabradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
fale, orphan, snecker

^ these will probably break a lot of documentation builds - one of my
package (nickle) is affected. Not sure I have the bandwith to help fix
this though.



Just FTR, according to the original email, only nickle seems to be affected.

Also rubygem-font-awesome-rails with rubygem-prawn-manual_builder 
appears to be leaf packages.



Vít



Best regards,


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 01:07:26PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
> 
> mailman3   infra-sig, orphan, salimma  0 weeks ago
> monkeytype orphan  0 weeks ago

Picked these back up - will try and address the issues this week, sorry
for the delay.

> rubygem-asciidoctor-pdfabradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
>fale, orphan, snecker
> rubygem-chunky_png mmorsi, orphan, snecker 0 weeks ago
> rubygem-css_parser abradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
>fale, orphan, snecker
> rubygem-font-awesome-rails abradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
>fale, orphan, snecker
> rubygem-prawn-icon abradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
>fale, orphan, snecker
> rubygem-prawn-manual_builder   abradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
>fale, orphan, snecker
> rubygem-prawn-svg  abradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
>fale, orphan, snecker
> rubygem-prawn-templatesabradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
>fale, orphan, snecker
^ these will probably break a lot of documentation builds - one of my
package (nickle) is affected. Not sure I have the bandwith to help fix
this though.

Best regards,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2120022] perl-GraphViz-2.25 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120022

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-GraphViz-2.25-1.fc38
   ||perl-GraphViz-2.25-1.fc37
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Last Closed||2022-08-22 16:37:16




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120022
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-GraphViz] PR #1: Tests

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-GraphViz` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
Tests
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-GraphViz/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2120008] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20220820 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120008



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-b0b60a5adc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-b0b60a5adc


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120008
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2120008] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20220820 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120008



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-1ba6349ff3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-1ba6349ff3


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120008
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-GraphViz] PR #1: Tests

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-GraphViz` that 
you are following:
``
Tests
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-GraphViz/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Imagefactory always uses uefi to create the vm for image creation

[Daniel P . Berrangé]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 12:03:21PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 11:57 AM Peter Boy  wrote:
> >
> >
> > Does anyone know how I can configure ImageFactory / OZ to use a BIOS VM  
> > for image generation? Unfortunately I haven't found any documentation on 
> > this.
> >
> >
> > For explanation:
> >
> > ImageFactory  uses a temporary VM to create a virtual machine disk image.
> >
> > At least since F36 it uses UEFI for this. If you want to create a biosboot 
> > image (which is the default in libvirt), this image cannot be booted in a 
> > UEFI VM. The build process either waits indefinitely for a UEFI compatible 
> > image or returns a non-bootable image.
> >
> > This also happens when I use an old host that does not support UEFI at all.
> >
> > At least with F34 this was different according to my memory.
> >
> 
> libvirt supports UEFI VMs just fine too. That said, you probably would
> want to make it a hybrid boot system to support both.

Yes, ideally any cloud images will be built such that they can boot on
both BIOS and UEFI, to maximise cloud compatibility.

> You can see how it's done in Fedora Cloud.

More specifically I believe this kickstart file is what Fedora images
are derived from:

  https://pagure.io/fedora-kickstarts/blob/main/f/fedora-cloud-base.ks


With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com  -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119963] perl-Prima-1.66 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119963



--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar  ---
exampels/menu.pl crashes when clicking on Window menu label.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119963
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119963] perl-Prima-1.66 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119963



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
It moves from default Gtk2 to Gtk3. Some modules renamed. Also many changes.
Suitable for Rawhide only.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119963
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Imagefactory always uses uefi to create the vm for image creation

[Neal Gompa]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 11:57 AM Peter Boy  wrote:
>
>
> Does anyone know how I can configure ImageFactory / OZ to use a BIOS VM  for 
> image generation? Unfortunately I haven't found any documentation on this.
>
>
> For explanation:
>
> ImageFactory  uses a temporary VM to create a virtual machine disk image.
>
> At least since F36 it uses UEFI for this. If you want to create a biosboot 
> image (which is the default in libvirt), this image cannot be booted in a 
> UEFI VM. The build process either waits indefinitely for a UEFI compatible 
> image or returns a non-bootable image.
>
> This also happens when I use an old host that does not support UEFI at all.
>
> At least with F34 this was different according to my memory.
>

libvirt supports UEFI VMs just fine too. That said, you probably would
want to make it a hybrid boot system to support both.

You can see how it's done in Fedora Cloud.




--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Imagefactory always uses uefi to create the vm for image creation

[Peter Boy]

Does anyone know how I can configure ImageFactory / OZ to use a BIOS VM  for 
image generation? Unfortunately I haven't found any documentation on this.


For explanation:

ImageFactory  uses a temporary VM to create a virtual machine disk image.

At least since F36 it uses UEFI for this. If you want to create a biosboot 
image (which is the default in libvirt), this image cannot be booted in a UEFI 
VM. The build process either waits indefinitely for a UEFI compatible image or 
returns a non-bootable image. 

This also happens when I use an old host that does not support UEFI at all.

At least with F34 this was different according to my memory.








Thanks
Peter
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: F37 Beta blocker status email

[Luna Jernberg]

Attending the meeting today

On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 8:51 PM Ben Cotton  wrote:

> Action summary
> 
>
> Accepted blockers
> -
>
> 1. kde-settings — KDE needs to pick up F37 backgrounds — ON_QA
> ACTION: None
>
> 2. sddm — Logout from KDE session on Rawhide goes to console, not SDDM —
> POST
> ACTION: Maintainers to build package with X11 by default
>
> Proposed blockers
> -
>
> 1. anaconda — Anaconda will not start F37 Raw — NEW
> ACTION: Reporter to provide requested log files
> NEEDINFO: aalmeleh.whatever.0101
>
> 2. dnf — "dnf update" runs out of memory on swapless 0.5 GiB RAM machine —
> NEW
> ACTION: Maintainers to investigate short-term dnf improvements
> NEEDINFO: jmracek
>
> 3. openssl-pkcs11 — FreeIPA client enrollment fails due to DNS issues
> with openssl-pkcs11-0.4.12-2.fc37 — NEW
> ACTION: Maintainers to diagnose issue
>
> 4. osinfo-db — failed to install server iso with virt-install due to
> the missing of isolinux in the media — NEW
> ACTION: Maintainers to diagnose issue
>
> Bug-by-bug detail
> =
>
> Accepted blockers
> -
>
> 1. kde-settings — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117706 —
> ON_QA
> KDE needs to pick up F37 backgrounds
>
> New desktop backgrounds require a new KDE settings update. Fixed in
> FEDORA-2022-fe8729bced.
>
> 2. sddm — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110801 — NEW
> Logout from KDE session on Rawhide goes to console, not SDDM
>
> After logging out of KDE Plasma, you end up at a console on tty2. SDDM
> had been running on tty1 but just shows a flashing cursor. This
> appears to be specific to Wayland, so a PR is pending to revert to and
> X11 default.
>
> Proposed blockers
> -
>
> 1. anaconda — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101229 — NEW
> Anaconda will not start F37 Raw
>
> Neither clicking the desktop icon nor the taskbar icon will launch
> anaconda. openQA is not experiencing this. Using basic graphics mode
> results in the expected behavior.
>
> 2. dnf — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1907030 — NEW
> "dnf update" runs out of memory on swapless 0.5 GiB RAM machine
>
> dnf is killed by oom-kill on machines with 512 MB of RAM. Adding a
> swap disk or disabling the updates repo works around this issue.
> Recently, FCOS has seen this behavior with 1 GB VMs. The issue appears
> to be the size of the metadata for the repository. The short term
> fixes look like they may need to be made on the repo side, not in dnf.
>
> 3. openssl-pkcs11 — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117859 —
> NEW
> FreeIPA client enrollment fails due to DNS issues with
> openssl-pkcs11-0.4.12-2.fc37
>
> Tests in openQA cannot resolve kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org. Previous
> F37 build (openssl-okcs11-0.4.12-1.fc37) behaves as expected. The
> corresponding versions both work on F36. Disabling dnssec on the
> server is a workaround.
>
> 4. osinfo-db — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103835 — NEW
> failed to install server iso with virt-install due to the missing of
> isolinux in the media
>
> virt-install fails because there's no isolinux path, where it looks
> for vmlinuz and initrd.img . An upstream fix has been released in F35,
> F36, and F37 updates, but it does not appear to fully solve the
> problem on F37 and Rawhide. See also RHBZ 2119633.
>
> --
> Ben Cotton
> He / Him / His
> Fedora Program Manager
> Red Hat
> TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
> ___
> test mailing list -- t...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/t...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

[jamesturner246]

On Fri, 2022-08-19 at 10:37 -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 08:42, Ian McInerney via devel
>  wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 1:08 PM Ben Cotton 
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 2:46 AM Merlin Cooper
> > >  wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > I like this policy, but it strikes me as odd that the
> > > > packagers' email
> > > > addresses are posted publicly on the Pagure tickets... Wouldn't
> > > > that
> > > > make it easier for spammers to get more email addresses?
> > > 
> > > The script has a flag I can use in the future which (I believe)
> > > will
> > > mask the addresses in the tickets. I didn't use it this time
> > > because
> > > email addresses are already displayed all over the place. If a
> > > spammer
> > > gets an email address from these tickets that they didn't have
> > > before,
> > > then I'll be very surprised.
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > I really wish people would stop making the argument that just
> > because other places/systems have terrible data hygiene, we can
> > have terrible data hygiene too. Fedora should be trying to set the
> > example of how to interact and behave, and the "follow the herd"
> > mentality here is not acceptable in my opinion.
> > 
> > Email address could be considered PII, and so there is a debate
> > about when the GDPR-type regulations would apply to them (from what
> > I read, it would apply for work email addresses giving full names
> > or personal email addresses). While there is a legal basis for
> > keeping the email address in the system and using it, I fail to see
> > a legal basis that would allow publicly displaying an email address
> > in this way.
> > 
> > Many systems are also trying to reduce the exposure of personal
> > email addresses, with major git hosting providers even creating
> > anonymous commit emails that can be associated with user accounts
> > on those systems and then used for your commits should you choose.
> > 
> > So in short, I strongly argue for masking/removing the email
> > address from all tickets like this, and the fact that they are
> > displayed there was is so concerning to me that I opened a ticket
> > about it last night:
> > https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/issue/619.
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> I am going to argue that this isn't bad data hygiene because this
> data being public serves an important purpose for the ongoing working
> of this project. 
> 
> When you become a Fedora maintainer, you are not just helping your
> fellow maintainers, you are also helping the general public who may
> be upstream developers, users, and packagers in different projects.
> When a person makes a change or has had their 'hands' on a package,
> that is made public in many many places to make sure that any and all
> interested people can contact them for questions. Upstream may have
> suggestions to make that change better or worse. Other packagers may
> need to understand why that package affects them. Packagers in
> different projects need to contact to see if this will solve their
> problem with said package or not. This has been and is mostly still
> done via email first and bugzilla and other methods last. 
> 
> When that information is not easily available, trust in the change,
> package, maintainer drops. That lack of trust tends to boil through
> many areas and lowers trust in the overall operations of the
> distribution. Because of this, email addresses for packagers have
> never been very secret. They are in spec files, they are in email
> posts about changes to packages, they are in various message buses
> which anyone can subscribe to on the idea that the information being
> free improves trust. 
> 
> Then there comes the removal of privileges. This is a big concern and
> needs to be done in an open and clear fashion. Other developers and
> packagers need to understand WHO was attempted to be contacted and
> why that contact may have failed. When other projects have not done
> this in an open arena, it has caused unrelated packagers to quit
> because they are not sure they can trust the project to not do the
> same with them. There is also the fact that email addresses change a
> lot and sometimes the person who has been listed as
> `foo...@uforgot.me` may have gone to `notme@notmy.email` and need to
> update their info. It might be even clear that notme@notmy.email has
> been active in bugzilla or some other area but hasn't done a build
> because a different maintainer has done so. 
> 
> We may need to come up with different methods of 'trust'. That is a
> larger conversation because it would require a complete rethink of
> what we are as a project and how we 'trust' each other, and allow
> others to 'trust' us. 
> 
> 
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
> 

[Bug 2120022] perl-GraphViz-2.25 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120022

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
   |lkund...@v3.sk, |
   |rc040...@freenet.de,|
   |vanmeeuwen+fedora@kolabsys. |
   |com, xav...@bachelot.org|
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120022
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2120008] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20220820 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120008

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-Module-CoreList-5.2022
   ||0820-1.fc38
   ||perl-Module-CoreList-5.2022
   ||0820-1.fc37
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |MODIFIED
 CC|jose.p.oliveira.oss@gmail.c |
   |om, jples...@redhat.com,|
   |mspa...@redhat.com, |
   |spo...@gmail.com,   |
   |st...@silug.org |




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120008
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2120004] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20220820 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120004

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
   ||0220820-1.fc38
   ||perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
   ||0220820-1.fc37




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120004
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2120004] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20220820 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120004



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-8812197fab has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8812197fab


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120004
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2120004] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20220820 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120004

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-34c4578f7d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-34c4578f7d


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120004
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119994] perl-DateTime-Locale-1.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119994



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-8cc1dd31a1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8cc1dd31a1


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119994
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119994] perl-DateTime-Locale-1.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119994

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-Locale-1.36-1
   ||.fc38
   ||perl-DateTime-Locale-1.36-1
   ||.fc37
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2022-08-22 15:00:18




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119994
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-DateTime-Locale] PR #2: 1.36 bump

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-DateTime-Locale` that 
you are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
1.36 bump
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DateTime-Locale/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2120004] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20220820 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120004

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 CC|iarn...@gmail.com,  |
   |jples...@redhat.com,|
   |mspa...@redhat.com  |




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120004
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-DateTime-Locale] PR #2: 1.36 bump

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-DateTime-Locale` 
that you are following:
``
1.36 bump
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DateTime-Locale/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: SElinux policy question on F34... lots of "device_t:sock_file write" AVCs

[Zdenek Pytela]

On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 5:21 PM Philip Prindeville <
philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com> wrote:

> Since July 6, I've been seeing a lot of AVC's though I've not changed
> anything in my policies.  Any ideas why?
>

> The majority seem to be device_t:sock_file write which implies to me that
> it's a macro that's missing in the base policies.
>
The denials rather indicate some problem on your filesystem. Are you aware
of any recent changes?



> [root@mail mail]# ausearch -m avc | audit2allow
>
>
> #= antivirus_t ==
> allow antivirus_t device_t:sock_file write;

...trimmed

>
Just guessing, but try to execute the following command to display
incorrect labels:

  # restorecon -Rvn /run/systemd/journal
or even (which can take a long time)
  # restorecon -Rvn /

To troubleshoot further, show currently mounted filesystems, installed
selinux-policy packages, and enable full auditing:

   # mount  | grep tmpfs
   # rpm -qa "selinux-policy*"
1) Open the /etc/audit/rules.d/audit.rules file in an editor.
2) Remove the following line if it exists:
-a task,never
3) Add the following line to the end of the file:
-w /etc/shadow -p w
4) Restart the audit daemon:
 # service auditd restart
5) Re-run your scenario.
6) Collect AVC denials:
 # ausearch -i -m avc,user_avc,selinux_err,user_selinux_err -ts today


And this may or may not be related, but I'm also getting a lot of ssh
> dropped connections:
>
> ssh_dispatch_run_fatal: Connection to 192.168.4.3 port 22: message
> authentication code incorrect
>
This cannot be assessed without any data.

-- 

Zdenek Pytela
Security SELinux team
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119963] perl-Prima-1.66 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119963

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 CC|ppi...@redhat.com   |




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119963
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

SPDX migration progress

[Vít Ondruch]

I just wonder if are we able to detect that the package is using SPDX 
tags already? Can we have some progress page or regular status update?



Vít



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119994] perl-DateTime-Locale-1.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119994

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC|iarn...@gmail.com,  |
   |jples...@redhat.com |
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119994
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119901] perl-Business-CreditCard-0.39 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119901



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-7cb6b062ff has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-7cb6b062ff


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119901
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119901] perl-Business-CreditCard-0.39 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119901



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-95464637b9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-95464637b9


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119901
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119901] perl-Business-CreditCard-0.39 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119901

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Business-CreditCard-0. |perl-Business-CreditCard-0.
   |39-1.fc38   |39-1.fc37




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119901
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119901] perl-Business-CreditCard-0.39 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119901

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-Business-CreditCard-0.
   ||39-1.fc38
 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
An enhancement release suitable for all Fedoras.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119901
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Packaging a cross-compilation environment (wasi-libc)

[Florian Weimer]

* Jan Staněk:

> Hi list,
> in order to be able to compile WASM natively on Fedora,
> I'm trying to package wasi-libc[1] to provide the Web Assembly System
> Interface.
>
> [1]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/wasi-libc
>
> My trouble is that this is in essence a cross-compilation environment,
> and I have zero experience in trying to package these.
> Also, I did not have much luck in trying to find any related
> documentation.

Cc:ing Josh because Rust apparently already builds wasi-libc.

I doubt that right now, one static build of wasi-libc will be able to
support both the Rust use cases and the NodeJS use case.  The versions
will likely be different, and the WASI interfaces are still evolving.
So if you package this separately, you probably should use paths with
“nodejs” in the name.

Another alternative would be to build wasi-libc from sources during the
NodeJS build, with the wasi-libc source either packaged separatedly, or
bundled with the NodeJS sources.  The former is how Go and Rust source
builds work in Fedora, so it's not that unusual.

> Some issues I have run into so far:
>
> - This is a libc implementation, which would probably conflict with the
>   glibc package by default. Looking at musl, the solution seems to be to
>   install into `/usr/{target}` prefix (i.e.  `/usr/wasm32-wasi/include`).
>   Not really sure how this works, any pointers appreciated.

Note that wasi-libc swaps out musl's malloc for dlmalloc, which is
licensed under the CC0 license, and this is no longer considered a
Fedora-compatible software license.

> - Clang seems to have issue with `-fstack-clash-protection` flag for the
>   `wasm32-wasi` target. What's the proper way to adjust these?

You cannot use the Fedora build flags for WASI because it's not a
GNU/Linux target.  I don't know what WASI (or WebAssembly) do to emulate
-fstack-clash-protection.  In theory, compiling for WASI could produce
explicit bounds checks for the addressable stack, which has to be
visible in addressable memory for C/C++ compatibility.  This is probably
the only portable way to implement something like
-fstack-clash-protection because WebAssembly is supposed to be portable
to systems without a MMU.  Even a more traditional implementation of
stack clash protection would need support from the WASI layer because of
the page size requirements.

Thanks,
Florian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Miro Hrončok]

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or
retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets 
retired.

Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/

Full report available at:
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2022-08-22.txt
grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.

For human readable dependency chains,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
For all orphaned packages,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan

  Package   (co)maintainersStatus Change

csound orphan  1 weeks ago
datanommer infra-sig, orphan   0 weeks ago
fawkes orphan, rmattes, timn   4 weeks ago
flare  orphan  2 weeks ago
flare-engine   orphan  2 weeks ago
git-lab-porcelain  orphan  1 weeks ago
ipsilonorphan, puiterwijk, simo0 weeks ago
kiwi-boxed-plugin  orphan  0 weeks ago
mailman3   infra-sig, orphan, salimma  0 weeks ago
monkeytype orphan  0 weeks ago
novacom-client orphan  0 weeks ago
novacom-server orphan  0 weeks ago
python-august  orphan  0 weeks ago
python-bitstruct   orphan  0 weeks ago
python-calligrabot merlinm, orphan 0 weeks ago
python-cu2qu   orphan  0 weeks ago
python-devtoolsorphan  0 weeks ago
python-evicorphan  0 weeks ago
python-jaydebeapi  orphan  0 weeks ago
python-requests-credssporphan  0 weeks ago
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdfabradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
   fale, orphan, snecker
rubygem-chunky_png mmorsi, orphan, snecker 0 weeks ago
rubygem-css_parser abradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
   fale, orphan, snecker
rubygem-font-awesome-rails abradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
   fale, orphan, snecker
rubygem-prawn-icon abradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
   fale, orphan, snecker
rubygem-prawn-manual_builder   abradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
   fale, orphan, snecker
rubygem-prawn-svg  abradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
   fale, orphan, snecker
rubygem-prawn-templatesabradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
   fale, orphan, snecker
schrootorphan, zachcarter  0 weeks ago
sourcetrailorphan  6 weeks ago
test-interface orphan  2 weeks ago
toped  orphan, tnorth  5 weeks ago
valyriatearorphan  2 weeks ago

The following packages require above mentioned packages:
Depending on: flare-engine (1), status change: 2022-08-02 (2 weeks ago)
flare (maintained by: orphan)
flare-1.13-1.fc36.noarch requires flare-engine = 1.13-1.fc36

Depending on: novacom-server (1), status change: 2022-08-17 (0 weeks ago)
novacom-client (maintained by: orphan)
		novacom-1.1.0-0.26.rc1.git.ff7641193a.fc37.x86_64 requires novacom-server = 
1.1.0-0.32.rc1.fc36


Depending on: python-bitstruct (1), status change: 2022-08-16 (0 weeks ago)
python-evic (maintained by: orphan)
		python-evic-0.1-0.27.git20161101.176cf0b.fc36.src requires python3-bitstruct 
= 7.1.0-10.fc35


Depending on: rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf (1), status change: 2022-08-15 (0 weeks 
ago)
nickle (maintained by: salimma)
   

[Bug 2119901] perl-Business-CreditCard-0.39 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119901

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|ppi...@redhat.com   |
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119901
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

[Fabio Valentini]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 1:13 PM Jan K  wrote:
>
> Do I get removed, while waiting for packages to be approved ?  Have been 
> waiting for a year, may take another ...

Waiting for a package review for that long is definitely not something
we want to happen.
Have you tried posting on the devel list, asking for a review, or
proposing a review swap?

And no, the announcement explicitly included this information:

> (Note that pagure.io is one of the systems
> checked for activity, so commenting on your ticket that you're still
> around will prevent you from showing up in the second round.)

However, it looks like there isn't even an open ticket for you here:
https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/issues

So there's nothing you need to do right now, since you're not
considered "inactive" at all.

Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

[Jan K]

Do I get removed, while waiting for packages to be approved ?  Have been 
waiting for a year, may take another ...

Jan
FAS copperi

From: Ben Cotton 
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2022 2:59 PM
To: Development discussions related to Fedora 
Subject: Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 1:18 AM Adam Williamson
 wrote:
>
> Can we handle that? Can you manually flag those cases to continue
> through the process, or something?

It's like 10,000 spoons, when all you need is removal from the
packager group. But yes, I'm manually handling those cases. Right now,
it's by putting them on a list of "people who will show up as active
but have acked removal". I have plans for how that can be handled in
the future without me keeping a separate list on my Todoist task. But
for now I am (slowly) going through every comment on tickets to make
sure that everything gets handled correctly.

--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Miro Hrončok]

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or
retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets 
retired.

Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/

Full report available at:
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2022-08-22.txt
grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.

For human readable dependency chains,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
For all orphaned packages,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan

  Package   (co)maintainersStatus Change

csound orphan  1 weeks ago
datanommer infra-sig, orphan   0 weeks ago
fawkes orphan, rmattes, timn   4 weeks ago
flare  orphan  2 weeks ago
flare-engine   orphan  2 weeks ago
git-lab-porcelain  orphan  1 weeks ago
ipsilonorphan, puiterwijk, simo0 weeks ago
kiwi-boxed-plugin  orphan  0 weeks ago
mailman3   infra-sig, orphan, salimma  0 weeks ago
monkeytype orphan  0 weeks ago
novacom-client orphan  0 weeks ago
novacom-server orphan  0 weeks ago
python-august  orphan  0 weeks ago
python-bitstruct   orphan  0 weeks ago
python-calligrabot merlinm, orphan 0 weeks ago
python-cu2qu   orphan  0 weeks ago
python-devtoolsorphan  0 weeks ago
python-evicorphan  0 weeks ago
python-jaydebeapi  orphan  0 weeks ago
python-requests-credssporphan  0 weeks ago
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdfabradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
   fale, orphan, snecker
rubygem-chunky_png mmorsi, orphan, snecker 0 weeks ago
rubygem-css_parser abradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
   fale, orphan, snecker
rubygem-font-awesome-rails abradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
   fale, orphan, snecker
rubygem-prawn-icon abradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
   fale, orphan, snecker
rubygem-prawn-manual_builder   abradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
   fale, orphan, snecker
rubygem-prawn-svg  abradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
   fale, orphan, snecker
rubygem-prawn-templatesabradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
   fale, orphan, snecker
schrootorphan, zachcarter  0 weeks ago
sourcetrailorphan  6 weeks ago
test-interface orphan  2 weeks ago
toped  orphan, tnorth  5 weeks ago
valyriatearorphan  2 weeks ago

The following packages require above mentioned packages:
Depending on: flare-engine (1), status change: 2022-08-02 (2 weeks ago)
flare (maintained by: orphan)
flare-1.13-1.fc36.noarch requires flare-engine = 1.13-1.fc36

Depending on: novacom-server (1), status change: 2022-08-17 (0 weeks ago)
novacom-client (maintained by: orphan)
		novacom-1.1.0-0.26.rc1.git.ff7641193a.fc37.x86_64 requires novacom-server = 
1.1.0-0.32.rc1.fc36


Depending on: python-bitstruct (1), status change: 2022-08-16 (0 weeks ago)
python-evic (maintained by: orphan)
		python-evic-0.1-0.27.git20161101.176cf0b.fc36.src requires python3-bitstruct 
= 7.1.0-10.fc35


Depending on: rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf (1), status change: 2022-08-15 (0 weeks 
ago)
nickle (maintained by: salimma)
   

Re: glibc 2.36 and DT_HASH (preserving it for F37+)

[Sérgio Basto]

On Mon, 2022-08-22 at 08:43 +0200, Christoph Erhardt wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On Sunday, 21 August 2022 17:29:56 CEST Neal Gompa wrote:
> > I don't disagree that glibc should respect what distros set, I'm
> > just
> > asking us to build glibc with a DT_HASH table added until a formal
> > deprecation/retirement cycle is done with all stakeholders aware of
> > the change and everyone aware of the consequences of such a
> > breakage.
> +1. Deprecations of this sort should follow a proper process with
> sufficient 
> formal advance notice.

+1. Such breakage will just harm the reputation Linux (IMO).




> Best,
> Christoph
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119882] perl-Socket-2.036 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119882

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-abcd05d959 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-abcd05d959


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119882
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119882] perl-Socket-2.036 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119882

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-Socket-2.036-1.fc38
   ||perl-Socket-2.036-1.fc37




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119882
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: glibc 2.36 and DT_HASH (preserving it for F37+)

[Fabio Valentini]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:01 AM Jakub Jelinek  wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 09:51:42AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> > > it's clear there's a documentation problem [with DT_GNU_HASH]
> > Partly due to lack of documentation, already I have seen "abuses"
>
> So what is
> https://akkadia.org/drepper/dsohowto.pdf
> https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/binutils/2006-10/msg00377.html
> https://flapenguin.me/elf-dt-gnu-hash
> then?

I'm sorry, which point were you trying to prove with these links?

-> https://akkadia.org/drepper/dsohowto.pdf

This is a ~50 page document, of which one page refers to DT_GNU_HASH,
and only contains a short description of how to use it.

- https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/binutils/2006-10/msg00377.html

This is a mailing list post by you, and you wrote:

"""but for the final specification I'm afraid you need to read
binutils and/or libc sources."""

- https://flapenguin.me/elf-dt-gnu-hash

This looks like a reverse-engineering effort of the binary DT_GNU_HASH
format based on the source code - it starts with:

"""The problem with it is that DT_GNU_HASH is not documented anywhere
other than in GNU binutils and glibc source code."""

Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Suggestion: Bring back ncurses-compat-libs

[Miroslav Lichvar]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:27:30AM +0200, LuK1337 wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I recently updated to prerelease F37 and to my surprise I noticed
> that ncurses-compat-libs has been removed in this change:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ncurses/c/e9317e9.

This compat package was enabled 7 years ago. Do we have some
guidelines whether applications outside of Fedora should be
considered, or how long generally it is expected for a compat package
to be available?

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2116641] perl-MIME-Charset-1.013.1 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116641

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
   Fixed In Version|perl-MIME-Charset-1.013.1-1 |perl-MIME-Charset-1.013.1-1
   |.fc38   |.fc37
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Last Closed||2022-08-22 08:44:00




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116641
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2116641] perl-MIME-Charset-1.013.1 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116641

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-MIME-Charset-1.013.1-1
   ||.fc38




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116641
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Suggestion: Bring back ncurses-compat-libs

[LuK1337]

Hello,

I recently updated to prerelease F37 and to my surprise I noticed
that ncurses-compat-libs has been removed in this change:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ncurses/c/e9317e9.
Is there any chance that we could bring this package back? AOSP prebuilt
LLVM toolchains still depend on libncurses.so.5, and it's slightly
inconvenient to have to workaround that problem when building AOSP.

- Łukasz
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: glibc 2.36 and DT_HASH (preserving it for F37+)

[Jakub Jelinek]

On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 09:51:42AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> > it's clear there's a documentation problem [with DT_GNU_HASH]
> Partly due to lack of documentation, already I have seen "abuses"

So what is
https://akkadia.org/drepper/dsohowto.pdf
https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/binutils/2006-10/msg00377.html
https://flapenguin.me/elf-dt-gnu-hash
then?

Jakub
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119882] perl-Socket-2.036 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119882

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
   |mspa...@redhat.com, |
   |ppi...@redhat.com   |
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119882
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2116641] perl-MIME-Charset-1.013.1 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116641

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|xav...@bachelot.org |ppi...@redhat.com




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116641
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: [Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2022-08-22 Fedora QA Meeting

[Tim Flink]

At some point, we do need to wrap up the TCMS conversation. If not this week 
then hopefully next week or the week after.

Tim

On 8/22/22 00:25, Adam Williamson wrote:

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting today/tomrrow. I
don't have anything much for the agenda again. There will be a
blocker review meeting, though.

If you're aware of anything it would be useful to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can run the meeting.

Thanks folks!

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: glibc 2.36 and DT_HASH (preserving it for F37+)

[Christoph Erhardt]

Hi all,

On Sunday, 21 August 2022 17:29:56 CEST Neal Gompa wrote:
> I don't disagree that glibc should respect what distros set, I'm just
> asking us to build glibc with a DT_HASH table added until a formal
> deprecation/retirement cycle is done with all stakeholders aware of
> the change and everyone aware of the consequences of such a breakage.
+1. Deprecations of this sort should follow a proper process with sufficient 
formal advance notice.

Best,
Christoph

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2022-08-22 Fedora QA Meeting

[Adam Williamson]

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting today/tomrrow. I
don't have anything much for the agenda again. There will be a
blocker review meeting, though.

If you're aware of anything it would be useful to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can run the meeting.

Thanks folks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue