corsepiu pushed to rpms/perl-Type-Tie (rawhide). "Upstream merged the Type::Tie distribution into the Type::Tiny distribution."
Notification time stamped 2022-10-05 04:46:21 UTC
From f3b8d722b50be5c52f0156240a948631e60da6c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Oct 05 2022 04:46:07 +
Subject: Upstream merged the Type::Tie distribution into the Type::Tiny
distribution.
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
deleted file mode 100644
index 56b4bd7..000
--- a/.gitignore
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-/Type-Tie-0.015.tar.gz
diff --git a/dead.package b/dead.package
new file mode 100644
index 000..1405527
--- /dev/null
+++ b/dead.package
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Upstream merged the Type::Tie distribution into the Type::Tiny distribution.
diff --git a/perl-Type-Tie.spec b/perl-Type-Tie.spec
deleted file mode 100644
index 2185b55..000
--- a/perl-Type-Tie.spec
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,169 +0,0 @@
-Name: perl-Type-Tie
-Version:0.015
-Release:9%{?dist}
-Summary:Tie a variable to a type constraint
-# cf. README
-License:GPL+ or Artistic
-URL:https://metacpan.org/release/Type-Tie
-Source0:
https://cpan.metacpan.org/authors/id/T/TO/TOBYINK/Type-Tie-%{version}.tar.gz
-BuildArch: noarch
-
-BuildRequires: make
-BuildRequires: %{__perl}
-BuildRequires: %{__make}
-
-BuildRequires: perl-interpreter >= 0:5.008005
-BuildRequires: perl-generators
-
-BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
-BuildRequires: perl(Exporter::Tiny) >= 0.026
-BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
-BuildRequires: perl(Hash::FieldHash)
-# Optional alternative to perl(Hash::FieldHash)
-# BuildRequires: perl(Hash::Util::FieldHash::Compat)
-BuildRequires: perl(Moo)
-BuildRequires: perl(Tie::Array)
-BuildRequires: perl(Tie::Hash)
-BuildRequires: perl(Tie::Scalar)
-BuildRequires: perl(strict)
-BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
-
-# Tests:
-%if !%{defined perl_bootstrap}
-# Build-cycle: perl-Type-Tiny → perl-Type-Tie
-BuildRequires: perl(Types::Standard)
-%endif
-BuildRequires: perl(Moose::Util::TypeConstraints)
-BuildRequires: perl(MooseX::Types::Moose)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Fatal)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) >= 0.96
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Requires)
-BuildRequires: perl(Try::Tiny)
-BuildRequires: perl(constant)
-
-Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo
$version))
-
-# perl-generators fails to detect this
-Requires: perl(Data::Dumper)
-
-%description
-This module exports a single function: ttie. ttie ties a variable to a
-type constraint, ensuring that whatever values stored in the variable
-will conform to the type constraint. If the type constraint has
-coercions, these will be used if necessary to ensure values assigned to
-the variable conform.
-
-%prep
-%setup -q -n Type-Tie-%{version}
-
-# Remove bundled stuff
-%{__rm} -r inc/
-sed -i -e '/^inc\/.*$/d' MANIFEST
-
-%build
-%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor NO_PACKLIST=1
-%{__make} %{?_smp_mflags}
-
-%install
-%{__make} pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
-%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
-
-%check
-%{__make} test
-
-%files
-%doc Changes README
-%license COPYRIGHT LICENSE
-%{perl_vendorlib}/*
-%{_mandir}/man3/*
-
-%changelog
-* Fri Jul 22 2022 Fedora Release Engineering -
0.015-9
-- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
-
-* Fri Jun 03 2022 Jitka Plesnikova - 0.015-8
-- Perl 5.36 re-rebuild of bootstrapped packages
-
-* Wed Jun 01 2022 Jitka Plesnikova - 0.015-7
-- Perl 5.36 rebuild
-
-* Fri Jan 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering -
0.015-6
-- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
-
-* Tue Jul 27 2021 Fedora Release Engineering -
0.015-5
-- Second attempt - Rebuilt for
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild
-
-* Mon May 24 2021 Jitka Plesnikova - 0.015-4
-- Perl 5.34 re-rebuild of bootstrapped packages
-
-* Sun May 23 2021 Jitka Plesnikova - 0.015-3
-- Perl 5.34 rebuild
-
-* Wed Jan 27 2021 Fedora Release Engineering -
0.015-2
-- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild
-
-* Thu Nov 19 2020 Ralf Corsépius - 0.015-1
-- Upstream update.
-
-* Tue Jul 28 2020 Fedora Release Engineering -
0.014-8
-- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
-
-* Fri Jun 26 2020 Jitka Plesnikova - 0.014-7
-- Perl 5.32 re-rebuild of bootstrapped packages
-
-* Tue Jun 23 2020 Jitka Plesnikova - 0.014-6
-- Perl 5.32 rebuild
-
-* Thu Jan 30 2020 Fedora Release Engineering -
0.014-5
-- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
-
-* Fri Jul 26 2019 Fedora Release Engineering -
0.014-4
-- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
-
-* Sun Jun 02 2019 Jitka Plesnikova - 0.014-3
-- Perl 5.30 re-rebuild of bootstrapped packages
-
-* Fri May 31 2019 Jitka Plesnikova - 0.014-2
-- Perl 5.30 rebuild
-
-* Tue Mar 05 2019 Ralf Corsépius - 0.014-1
-- Upstream update.
-
-* Sat Feb 02 2019 Fedora Release Engineering -
0.013-2
-- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild
-
-* Thu Jan 10 2019 Ralf
Re: openshadinglanguage failure on non x86_64
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2022/10/10 2:46: Hello team, openshadinglanguage 1.12.6.2 only successfully built on x86_64 architecture but failed on others due to the following errors: In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenShadingLanguage-1.12.6.2/src/liboslexec/oslexec_pvt.h:42, from /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenShadingLanguage-1.12.6.2/src/liboslexec/oslexec.cpp:12: /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenShadingLanguage-1.12.6.2/src/include/OSL/mask.h:7:10: fatal error: immintrin.h: No such file or directory 7 | #include | ^ compilation terminated. That "immintrin.h" is provided by both gcc and clang according to "dnf -C repoquery --whatprovides */immintrin.h". Could someone investigate the cause and provide a patch? See https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92833862 Thanks in advance Well, gcc immintrin.h is "/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/12/include/immintrin.h" (note that "x86_64-" path). And clang immintrin.h "/usr/lib64/clang/15.0.0/include/immintrin.h" says: -- #if !defined(__i386__) && !defined(__x86_64__) #error "This header is only meant to be used on x86 and x64 architecture" #endif -- AFAIK immintrin.h is available only on x86 / x86_64. Then as far as I looked at src/include/OSL/mask.h, it looks like actually this supports non-x86 architectures (as I see #elif defined(__GNUC__) || defined(__clang__) or so), so just try to guard the inclusion like #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) #include #endif and see how it goes. Maybe some additional modification is needed, but for now I expect that most things may go well. Regards, Mamoru ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [INPUT REQUESTED] Re: F38 proposal: Node.js Repackaging (Self-Contained Change proposal)
Hi Stephen, Stephen Gallagher writes: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 2:29 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > *snip* > When a Node.js release goes out of support, we have a question to > answer: do we Obsolete it with a newer version? If so, which one? The > most recent version or the oldest one? It will not be 100% compatible > in either case. Do we Obsolete it with fedora-retired-packages? Do we > just leave the packages in Fedora forever (possibly patching the > `/usr/bin/node` binary to warn that it's out of support)? I would definitely obsolete it. I personally would obsolete it with the default nodejs version, if there is one. > There's another potential upgrade issue: We have multiple choices of > how to upgrade from the nodejs package to the nodejsXX packages: > 1) Upgrading from either F36 or F37 will result in you getting Node.js > 18. (This method is closest to how things worked prior to this Change, > where the nodejs package would just get updated to the latest stable > release) > 2) Upgrading from F36 will move you onto nodejs16 in F38. Upgrading > from F37 will move you onto Node.js 18 in F38. (This method maintains > compatibility with applications running on the current system) > 3) Upgrading from F36 or F37 will *remove* the nodejs package and the > user will need to manually select one to install. (This method has > increased friction, but more user choice) > 4) Upgrading from F36 or F37 will leave the existing nodejs package on > the system, receiving no updates. Users of F38 will need to manually > remove and install a newer version. (This method is high-friction, > offers nothing over any of the others and potentially leaves people > vulnerable) > > With options 1), 3) and 4), we can make the change in F38 exclusively. > However if we want to do 2), we *also* need to either backport this > Change to Fedora 37 and Fedora 36 because otherwise we would have to > continuously update the Obsoletes: values in F38. With 1) I can update > the Obsoletes: to just treat any Node.js with an epoch < 3 as the > trigger to move to nodejs18. > > My questions to those brave souls who have read this far: > 1) Which do you think is the best of the above options for upgrades to F38? My personal preference would be Option 1. Imho it's a bit expected that you might have to do some cleanup after a system upgrade. So moving to the latest stable version sounds like a good overall compromise for most users: you'll get the latest stable version and if you need an older version, you'll (hopefully) figure it out during the post-upgrade cleanup. (And we could implement it without backporting) > 2) What do we do about future upgrades in the following scenarios: > a. The user has nodejsXX installed as the default interpreter. The > nodejsXX package is no longer available upon upgrade (EOL). I would upgrade to the new default version. > b. The user has nodejsXX installed as the default interpreter. The > nodejsXX package is available but non-default upon upgrade. Unless it is very simple to upgrade to that non-default version on upgrade, I'd just upgrade to the new default/latest stable as well in this case. Cheers, Dan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
openshadinglanguage failure on non x86_64
Hello team, openshadinglanguage 1.12.6.2 only successfully built on x86_64 architecture but failed on others due to the following errors: In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenShadingLanguage-1.12.6.2/src/liboslexec/oslexec_pvt.h:42, from /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenShadingLanguage-1.12.6.2/src/liboslexec/oslexec.cpp:12: /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenShadingLanguage-1.12.6.2/src/include/OSL/mask.h:7:10: fatal error: immintrin.h: No such file or directory 7 | #include | ^ compilation terminated. That "immintrin.h" is provided by both gcc and clang according to "dnf -C repoquery --whatprovides */immintrin.h". Could someone investigate the cause and provide a patch? See https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92833862 Thanks in advance -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2133144] perl-Devel-Timer-0.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133144 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-5c248a39bb has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-5c248a39bb` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-5c248a39bb See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133144 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0dc9b5c110 seamonkey-2.53.14-3.el8 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-56709b917a weechat-3.6-1.el8 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-56c3cc55b3 apptainer-1.1.2-1.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing mate-polkit-1.26.1-1.el8 Details about builds: mate-polkit-1.26.1-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-58a5cf15a5) Integrates polkit authentication for MATE desktop Update Information: - update to 1.26.1 ChangeLog: * Sun Oct 9 2022 Wolfgang Ulbrich - 1.26.1-1 - update to 1.26.1 ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2133215] perl-Finance-Quote-1.53 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133215 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-0d956e603a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-0d956e603a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133215 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2133215] perl-Finance-Quote-1.53 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133215 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-a5707af904 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-a5707af904 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133215 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing: Age URL 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1c6c522b07 weechat-3.6-1.el9 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c5646c5693 apptainer-1.1.2-1.el9 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing fluidsynth-2.3.0-1.el9 jpegoptim-1.5.0-1.el9 mate-polkit-1.26.1-1.el9 rust-crossbeam-epoch-0.9.11-1.el9 rust-crossbeam-utils-0.8.12-1.el9 rust-itoa-1.0.4-1.el9 rust-serde-1.0.145-1.el9 rust-serde_derive-1.0.145-1.el9 rust-serde_test-1.0.145-1.el9 texlive-extension-20200406-30.el9 Details about builds: fluidsynth-2.3.0-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0e3e701236) Real-time software synthesizer Update Information: Update to 2.3.0 ChangeLog: * Fri Sep 30 2022 Christoph Karl - 2.3.0-1 - Update to 2.3.0 jpegoptim-1.5.0-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8c02dbd1c3) Utility to optimize JPEG files Update Information: v1.5.0 - Parallel processing support added. Use option -w max or --workers=max to enable. - Fix --stdin option - Other minor fixes ChangeLog: * Fri Oct 7 2022 Denis Fateyev - 1.5.0-1 - Update to version 1.5.0 * Thu Jul 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.4.6-10 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild References: [ 1 ] Bug #2130651 - jpegoptim-1.5.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130651 mate-polkit-1.26.1-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-68e286f887) Integrates polkit authentication for MATE desktop Update Information: - update to 1.26.1 ChangeLog: * Sun Oct 9 2022 Wolfgang Ulbrich - 1.26.1-1 - update to 1.26.1 rust-crossbeam-epoch-0.9.11-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-fb8c5127ca) Epoch-based garbage collection Update Information: Update to version 0.9.11. ChangeLog: * Sat Oct 8 2022 Fabio Valentini 0.9.11-1 - Update to version 0.9.11; Fixes RHBZ#2130740 rust-crossbeam-utils-0.8.12-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b0e731cebf) Utilities for concurrent programming Update Information: Update to version 0.8.12. ChangeLog: * Sat Oct 8 2022 Fabio Valentini 0.8.12-1 - Update to version 0.8.12; Fixes RHBZ#2130741 rust-itoa-1.0.4-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-9a41263dc2) Fast integer primitive to string conversion Update Information: Update to version 1.0.4. ChangeLog: * Sat Oct 8 2022 Fabio Valentini 1.0.4-1 - Update to version 1.0.4; Fixes RHBZ#2132842 rust-serde-1.0.145-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-5ab690e04b) Generic serialization/deserialization framework Update Information: - Update the serde crate to version 1.0.145. - Update the serde_derive crate to version 1.0.145. - Update the serde_test crate to version 1.0.145. ChangeLog: * Sat Oct 8
[Bug 2133215] perl-Finance-Quote-1.53 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133215 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Finance-Quote-1.53-1.f ||c38 Last Closed||2022-10-09 15:28:19 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-8ec3a8dbb8 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133215 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2133215] perl-Finance-Quote-1.53 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133215 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-8ec3a8dbb8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8ec3a8dbb8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133215 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2133144] perl-Devel-Timer-0.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133144 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-d75d202b62 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-d75d202b62` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-d75d202b62 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133144 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora 37 compose report: 20221009.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-37-20221008.n.0 NEW: Fedora-37-20221009.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 0 B Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree ppc64le Path: Silverblue/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-ppc64le-37-20221008.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Test-Announce] Fedora 37 Branched 20221009.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 37 Branched 20221009.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/testcase_stats/37 You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_37_Branched_20221009.n.0_Summary The individual test result pages are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_37_Branched_20221009.n.0_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_37_Branched_20221009.n.0_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_37_Branched_20221009.n.0_Server https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_37_Branched_20221009.n.0_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_37_Branched_20221009.n.0_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_37_Branched_20221009.n.0_Security_Lab Thank you for testing! -- Mail generated by relvalconsumer: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relvalconsumer ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20221009.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221008.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221009.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 56 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 281.51 MiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 11.60 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Kinoite/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20221008.n.0.iso Image: Server_KVM qcow2 ppc64le Path: Server/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Server-KVM-Rawhide-20221008.n.0.ppc64le.qcow2 = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: ags-3.6.0.35-1.fc38 Old package: ags-3.6.0.33-2.fc38 Summary: Engine for creating and running videogames of adventure (quest) genre RPMs: ags Size: 5.41 MiB Size change: 13.42 KiB Changelog: * Thu Oct 06 2022 Dominik Mierzejewski - 3.6.0.35-1 - update to 3.6.0.35 (#2108390) Package: clover2-11.0.0-1.fc38 Old package: clover2-10.4.6-10.D20190613git6f483b4.fc37 Summary: Yet another compiler language RPMs: clover2 clover2-devel clover2-libs Size: 3.71 MiB Size change: 66.14 KiB Changelog: * Sat Oct 08 2022 Mamoru TASAKA - 11.0.0-1 - Update to 11.0.0 Package: corectrl-1.3.1-1.fc38 Old package: corectrl-1.2.7-1.fc38 Summary: Friendly hardware control RPMs: corectrl Size: 5.53 MiB Size change: 365.51 KiB Changelog: * Sun Sep 18 2022 Artem Polishchuk 1.3.0-1 - chore(update): 1.3.0 * Sat Oct 08 2022 Artem Polishchuk 1.3.1-1 - build(update): 1.3.1 Package: disciplining-minipod-3.4.0-2.fc38 Old package: disciplining-minipod-3.3.9-2.fc38 Summary: Disciplining algorithm for Atomic Reference Time Card RPMs: liboscillator-disciplining liboscillator-disciplining-devel Size: 267.79 KiB Size change: 693 B Changelog: * Fri Oct 07 2022 Oleg Obleukhov 3.4.0-1 - Update to 3.4.0 Package: dosbox-staging-0.79.1-2.fc38 Old package: dosbox-staging-0.78.1-6.fc38 Summary: DOS/x86 emulator focusing on ease of use RPMs: dosbox-staging Size: 7.18 MiB Size change: 1.36 MiB Changelog: * Sat Oct 08 2022 Otto Liljalaakso 0.79.1-1 - Update to 0.79.1 (rhbz#2128116) Package: f37-backgrounds-37.0.4-1.fc38 Old package: f37-backgrounds-37.0.2-1.fc38 Summary: Fedora 37 default desktop background RPMs: f37-backgrounds f37-backgrounds-base f37-backgrounds-extras-base f37-backgrounds-extras-gnome f37-backgrounds-extras-kde f37-backgrounds-extras-mate f37-backgrounds-extras-xfce f37-backgrounds-gnome f37-backgrounds-kde f37-backgrounds-mate f37-backgrounds-xfce Size: 6.88 MiB Size change: 6.27 MiB Changelog: * Thu Sep 29 2022 Luya Tshimbalanga - 37.0.3-1 - New release with fixes for XFCE and LDXE * Mon Oct 03 2022 Luya Tshimbalanga - 37.0.4-1 - New release with fixed default wallpaper Package: gn-2065^20220714gitb9c6c19be95a-1.fc38 Old package: gn-2064^20220714gitcc28efe62ef0-1.fc38 Summary: Meta-build system that generates build files for Ninja RPMs: gn gn-doc Size: 2.85 MiB Size change: 245 B Changelog: * Sat Oct 08 2022 Benjamin A. Beasley 2065^20220714gitb9c6c19be95a-1 - Update to version 2065 Package: golang-github-mattn-tty-0.0.4-1.fc38 Old package: golang-github-mattn-tty-0.0.3-8.fc37 Summary: Simple tty utility RPMs: golang-github-mattn-tty-devel Size: 17.19 KiB Size change: -168 B Changelog: * Sat Oct 08 2022 Elliott Sales de Andrade - 0.0.4-1 - Update to latest version (#2043502) Package: golang-github-projectdiscovery-goflags-0.1.1-1.fc38 Old package: golang-github-projectdiscovery-goflags-0.0.9-1.fc37 Summary: A go flag wrapper with convenience helpers RPMs: golang-github-projectdiscovery-goflags-devel Size: 81.94 KiB Size change: 60.58 KiB Changelog: * Sat Oct 08 2022 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 0.1.1-1 - Update to 0.1.1 - Closes rhbz#2126569 Package: gsi-openssh-9.0p1-2.fc38 Old package: gsi-openssh-9.0p1-1.fc38 Summary: An implementation of the SSH protocol with GSI authentication RPMs: gsi-openssh gsi-openssh-clients gsi-openssh-server Size: 5.42 MiB Size change: 4.11 KiB Changelog: * Tue Oct 04 2022 Mattias Ellert - 9.0p1-2 - Based on openssh-9.0p1-5.fc38 Package: jpegoptim-1.5.0-1.fc38 Old package: jpegoptim-1.4.6-10.fc37 Summary: Utility to optimize JPEG files RPMs: jpegoptim Size: 166.75 KiB Size change: 31.08 KiB Changelog: * Fri Oct 07 2022 Denis Fateyev - 1.5.0-1 - Update to version 1.5.0 Package: nextcloud-24.0.5-1.fc38 Old package: nextcloud-24.0.3-1.fc37 Summary: Private file sync and share server RPMs
Re: Mesa in F37- vaapi support disabled for h264/h265/vc1
Thanks! Daniel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Mesa in F37- vaapi support disabled for h264/h265/vc1
On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 10:25:08AM -, Daniel Rusek wrote: > Hello, > > Just a note. If someone from RPM Fusion who is interested in packaging > full mesa-va-drivers package reads this, please, make sure that the > package also contains valid AppStream metadata and is showing in GNOME > Software / KDE Discover the same way as, for example, NVIDIA driver > does. It is _unacceptable_ to force end users to search for and > install the driver package via terminal. Thanks! You can provide feedback at the review request https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426 -- Tomasz TorczOnce you've read the dictionary, @ttorcz:pipebreaker.pl every other book is just a remix. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Mesa in F37- vaapi support disabled for h264/h265/vc1
It is just a simple, short xml file, not a big deal for maintainers, but actually quite a big deal for many end users. If anyone from RPM Fusion needs a help with this file, feel free to drop me a line. :-) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Mesa in F37- vaapi support disabled for h264/h265/vc1
Because Fedora also targets regular users who are not experts and also because it would make it much easier for all users to find and install that package (for example by entering "h264" in GNOME Shell Overview on a RPM Fusion enabled system) instead of requiring them to search/install the package via dnf. If it will be available only via terminal, it will probably get ignored by many users, at least this is my opinion. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Mesa in F37- vaapi support disabled for h264/h265/vc1
On Sun, 2022-10-09 at 10:25 +, Daniel Rusek wrote: > Hello, > > Just a note. If someone from RPM Fusion who is interested in > packaging full mesa-va-drivers package reads this, please, make sure > that the package also contains valid AppStream metadata and is > showing in GNOME Software / KDE Discover the same way as, for > example, NVIDIA driver does. It is _unacceptable_ to force end users > to search for and install the driver package via terminal. Thanks! > > Regards, > Daniel > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue Why is it unacceptable? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Mesa in F37- vaapi support disabled for h264/h265/vc1
Here is an example of the driver component AppStream metadata type: https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/sect-Metadata-Driver.html You can probably ignore the tag. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Mesa in F37- vaapi support disabled for h264/h265/vc1
Hello, Just a note. If someone from RPM Fusion who is interested in packaging full mesa-va-drivers package reads this, please, make sure that the package also contains valid AppStream metadata and is showing in GNOME Software / KDE Discover the same way as, for example, NVIDIA driver does. It is _unacceptable_ to force end users to search for and install the driver package via terminal. Thanks! Regards, Daniel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2133212] perl-hash-Merge-Simple can not be installed on Rocky Linux 8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133212 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth --- The perl(Clone) module is in the Rocky 8 PowerTools repository, which should be enabled in order to use packages (particularly perl modules) from EPEL. See the "CentOS" instructions here (unfortunately not updated for Alma and Rocky): https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/#how_can_i_use_these_extra_packages There has been some discussion on enabling this repository automatically since this is such a common issue but it's not that straightforward: https://pagure.io/epel/issue/128 Anyway, enable that repository and you'll be able to install perl-Hash-Merge-Simple from EPEL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133212 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Grub menu with 3 kernels by default
Am 05.10.22 um 23:07 schrieb Chris Murphy: On Wed, Oct 5, 2022, at 3:01 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: 3. "Boot menu" in GUI? Given that one can reach the GUI, why it should not be possible to choose the boot entry for next boot? Or even choose to open FW setup. This could solve this other problem too. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049849 The GUI tool can use efibootmgr to set bootnext or even bootorder. Did the situation regarding potentially increased wear on the nvram chips change? This was one of the reasons upstream GRUB were reluctant to use bootnext [1]. I do not know if this is scaremongering or not, but having the nvram fail sounds like something quite catastrophic if it does happen, resulting in a mobo replacement on a desktop and potentially a complete writeoff on a laptop. Best regards, Julian [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2022-02/msg00134.html ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131444] perl-Workflow-1.61 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131444 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Fixed In Version||perl-Workflow-1.61-1.fc38 Status|NEW |CLOSED Last Closed||2022-10-09 07:02:11 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2073344 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131444 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131442] perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu-1.43 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131442 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu-1.43 ||-1.fc38 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Last Closed||2022-10-09 07:01:27 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2073348 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131442 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
