Re: [Test-Announce] 2022-10-31 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 37 Blocker Review Meeting
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 7:05 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > I swear I proofread these things. Just apparently not hard enough. Swearing hard can get you disinvited from the trendy restaurants (except for Brooklyn, where every other word has been required to be (by legislation) the F word). ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Mirros aren't working in Fedora Rawhide
That fixed it thanks. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Mirros aren't working in Fedora Rawhide
Will you please stop making new threads about the same issue? You were told 4 days ago that your metadata is stale and how to refresh it (pkcon refresh force). If you think there's a bug, file a bug report in bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Mirros aren't working in Fedora Rawhide
https://ibb.co/NNG6DKH";>https://i.ibb.co/rpXG8H1/Screenshot-from-2022-10-25-19-37-56.png"; alt="Screenshot-from-2022-10-25-19-37-56" border="0"> https://ibb.co/ryRCNk8";>https://i.ibb.co/6s73LY9/Screenshot-from-2022-10-27-23-50-54.png"; alt="Screenshot-from-2022-10-27-23-50-54" border="0"> https://ibb.co/GnnRzvS";>https://i.ibb.co/DzzQ0D2/Screenshot-from-2022-10-29-18-43-48.png"; alt="Screenshot-from-2022-10-29-18-43-48" border="0"> ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: ailed to install packages: Cannot download Packages/v/vim-minimal-9.0.412-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm: All mirrors were tried; Last error: Status code: 404 for http://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/fedora/li
https://ibb.co/NNG6DKH";>https://i.ibb.co/rpXG8H1/Screenshot-from-2022-10-25-19-37-56.png"; alt="Screenshot-from-2022-10-25-19-37-56" border="0"> https://ibb.co/ryRCNk8";>https://i.ibb.co/6s73LY9/Screenshot-from-2022-10-27-23-50-54.png"; alt="Screenshot-from-2022-10-27-23-50-54" border="0"> https://ibb.co/GnnRzvS";>https://i.ibb.co/DzzQ0D2/Screenshot-from-2022-10-29-18-43-48.png"; alt="Screenshot-from-2022-10-29-18-43-48" border="0"> ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
ailed to install packages: Cannot download Packages/v/vim-minimal-9.0.412-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm: All mirrors were tried; Last error: Status code: 404 for http://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/fedora/linux/
ailed to install packages: Cannot download Packages/v/vim-minimal-9.0.412-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm: All mirrors were tried; Last error: Status code: 404 for http://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/v/vim-minimal-9.0.412-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm (IP: 128.112.18.21) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Heads-up: flatbuffers 22.10.26 coming to Rawhide
I will be updating flatbuffers in Rawhide from 2.0.8 to 22.10.26[1] on 2022-11-05 or later. Upstream has switched to a new year-based versioning scheme, and since the .so version is derived from the major version number, the .so version is also bumped (from 2 to 22). Because flatbuffers is currently a leaf package, this should not affect any other packages in the distribution. – Ben Beasley (FAS music) [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/flatbuffers/pull-request/3 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
cannabis
I want all people to be healthy. And cannabis can help with that. THCV https://valhallavitalityshop.com/blogs/news/the-best-spermidine-supplements-to-buy is important in the medical field because of its health benefits. One of its best qualities is its quick action and abrasion ability. It acts quickly to provide the desired brain-activating effect, and it wipes off quickly. This property works best for consumers who want its effects to be shorter. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Failed RPM database migrations
On 29-10-2022 17:37, Neal Gompa wrote: On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 10:49 AM Orion Poplawski wrote: On 10/28/22 22:53, Todd Zullinger wrote: It seems that it's not so much a failed migration as a migration which is never attempted. :/ Likely in certain situations. What I don't understand is why all the trickery around enabling the service - why not just enable it unconditionally? It already has a condition: I was being careful because I wasn't initially sure what approach I'd use. It changed a couple of times. It can probably change now to be unconditional activation during install/upgrade of rpm, though. Now may be a good time to get this fixed. Once F37 is released and again once F35 goes EOL a large number of users will upgrade. -- Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Failed RPM database migrations
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 10:49 AM Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 10/28/22 22:53, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042147#c2 > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RelocateRPMToUsr > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2042099 > >> > >> The RPM database is supposed to move from /var/lib/rpm to > >> /usr/lib/sysimage/rpm. This was supposed to happen automatically when > >> you upgraded the rpm package from an earlier version to 4.17.0-10.fc36 > >> (Feb-Mar 2022). > >> > >> On several machines it is reported that the migration was only half- > >> completed. The symptoms are that the RPM database is still in > >> /var/lib/rpm (/usr contains symlinks to it). See typical output from > >> failed & successful migrations at the end of the email. > >> > >> So _if_ you have rpm >= 4.17.0-10.fc36 installed: > >> > >> - Do you see the symptom of a failed migration? Or does it appear > >> to be successful? (Or neither case??) > >> > >> - Did you: > >> * Install F37 or Rawhide from scratch? > >> * Upgrade using ordinary dnf update or similar? > >> * Upgrade using dnf system-upgrade? > >> * Some other install/upgrade method? > > > > I upgraded two systems from f35 to f36 in the past week via > > dnf system-upgrade. Neither of them completed the rpm > > migration. > > > > I _think_ the issue is due to the version-release in the > > %triggerun which should enable the rpmdb-migrate service. > > That is: > > > > %triggerun -- rpm < 4.17.0-7 > > # Handle rpmdb migrate service on erasure of old to avoid ordering > > issues > > if [ -x /usr/bin/systemctl ]; then > > systemctl --no-reload preset rpmdb-migrate ||: > > fi > > > > That was accurate when it was added in 0b9f813 (Migrate > > rpmdb to /usr/lib/sysimage/rpm (#2042099), 2022-01-26). > > > > However, when rpm was updated in f35 in e9927df (Rebase to > > rpm 4.17.1 (http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.17.1), > > 2022-07-01), which never had the migration code, it > > prevented any up-to-date f35 system from triggering the > > migration. > > > > Anyone upgrading from f35 after rpm-4.17.1 was pushed to > > f35 won't have the rpmdb-migrate service enabled and the > > database will remain in /var/lib/rpm (with .migratedb) and > > symlinks in /usr/lib/sysimage/rpm. > > > > It seems that it's not so much a failed migration as a > > migration which is never attempted. :/ > > Likely in certain situations. > > What I don't understand is why all the trickery around enabling the > service - why not just enable it unconditionally? It already has a > condition: > I was being careful because I wasn't initially sure what approach I'd use. It changed a couple of times. It can probably change now to be unconditional activation during install/upgrade of rpm, though. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Failed RPM database migrations
On 10/28/22 22:53, Todd Zullinger wrote: Hi, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042147#c2 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RelocateRPMToUsr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2042099 The RPM database is supposed to move from /var/lib/rpm to /usr/lib/sysimage/rpm. This was supposed to happen automatically when you upgraded the rpm package from an earlier version to 4.17.0-10.fc36 (Feb-Mar 2022). On several machines it is reported that the migration was only half- completed. The symptoms are that the RPM database is still in /var/lib/rpm (/usr contains symlinks to it). See typical output from failed & successful migrations at the end of the email. So _if_ you have rpm >= 4.17.0-10.fc36 installed: - Do you see the symptom of a failed migration? Or does it appear to be successful? (Or neither case??) - Did you: * Install F37 or Rawhide from scratch? * Upgrade using ordinary dnf update or similar? * Upgrade using dnf system-upgrade? * Some other install/upgrade method? I upgraded two systems from f35 to f36 in the past week via dnf system-upgrade. Neither of them completed the rpm migration. I _think_ the issue is due to the version-release in the %triggerun which should enable the rpmdb-migrate service. That is: %triggerun -- rpm < 4.17.0-7 # Handle rpmdb migrate service on erasure of old to avoid ordering issues if [ -x /usr/bin/systemctl ]; then systemctl --no-reload preset rpmdb-migrate ||: fi That was accurate when it was added in 0b9f813 (Migrate rpmdb to /usr/lib/sysimage/rpm (#2042099), 2022-01-26). However, when rpm was updated in f35 in e9927df (Rebase to rpm 4.17.1 (http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.17.1), 2022-07-01), which never had the migration code, it prevented any up-to-date f35 system from triggering the migration. Anyone upgrading from f35 after rpm-4.17.1 was pushed to f35 won't have the rpmdb-migrate service enabled and the database will remain in /var/lib/rpm (with .migratedb) and symlinks in /usr/lib/sysimage/rpm. It seems that it's not so much a failed migration as a migration which is never attempted. :/ Likely in certain situations. What I don't understand is why all the trickery around enabling the service - why not just enable it unconditionally? It already has a condition: ConditionPathExists=/var/lib/rpm/.migratedb and so won't run multiple times. In my case though it seems to be a product of a bad conditional. I'm running a continually updating rawhide VM and: Jan 06 10:16:09 vmrawhide-rufous.cora.nwra.com systemd[1]: rpmdb-rebuild.service - RPM database rebuild was skipped because of a failed condition check (ConditionPathExists=/var/lib/rpm/.rebuilddb). ... Feb 06 19:35:14 vmrawhide-rufous.cora.nwra.com systemd[1]: rpmdb-rebuild.service - RPM database rebuild was skipped because of a failed condition check (ConditionPathExists=/var/lib/rpm/.rebuilddb). Feb 08 19:56:31 vmrawhide-rufous.cora.nwra.com systemd[1]: rpmdb-rebuild.service - RPM database rebuild was skipped because of a failed condition check (ConditionPathExists=/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm/.rebuilddb). ... Oct 16 09:47:01 vmrawhide-rufous.cora.nwra.com systemd[1]: rpmdb-rebuild.service - RPM database rebuild was skipped because of a failed condition check (ConditionPathExists=/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm/.rebuilddb). Oct 27 17:32:57 vmrawhide-rufous.cora.nwra.com systemd[1]: rpmdb-rebuild.service - RPM database rebuild was skipped because of an unmet condition check (ConditionPathExists=/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm/.rebuilddb). # systemctl status rpmdb-rebuild.service ○ rpmdb-rebuild.service - RPM database rebuild Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/rpmdb-rebuild.service; enabled; preset: enabled) Active: inactive (dead) Condition: start condition failed at Thu 2022-10-27 17:32:57 MDT; 1 day 15h ago Oct 27 17:32:57 vmrawhide-rufous.cora.nwra.com systemd[1]: rpmdb-rebuild.service - RPM database rebuild was skipped because of an unmet condition check (ConditionPathExists=/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm/.rebuilddb). # ls -la /usr/lib/sysimage/rpm/ total 8 drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Oct 5 05:05 . drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Aug 9 07:27 .. lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 34 Oct 5 20:32 .migratedb -> ../../../../var/lib/rpm/.migratedb lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 36 Oct 5 20:32 rpmdb.sqlite -> ../../../../var/lib/rpm/rpmdb.sqlite lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 40 Oct 5 20:32 rpmdb.sqlite-shm -> ../../../../var/lib/rpm/rpmdb.sqlite-shm lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 40 Oct 5 20:32 rpmdb.sqlite-wal -> ../../../../var/lib/rpm/rpmdb.sqlite-wal lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 33 Oct 5 20:32 .rpm.lock -> ../../../../var/lib/rpm/.rpm.lock # ls -la /var/lib/rpm total 444064 drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Feb 6 2022 . drwxr-xr-x. 68 root root 4096 Aug 9 07:27 .. -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 Oct 5 20:35 .migratedb -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 454676480 Oct 28 20:27 rpmdb.sqlite -rw-r--r--.
Fedora 37 compose report: 20221029.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-37-20221028.n.0 NEW: Fedora-37-20221029.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 0 B Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Server_KVM qcow2 s390x Path: Server/s390x/images/Fedora-Server-KVM-37-20221029.n.0.s390x.qcow2 Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Kinoite/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-x86_64-37-20221029.n.0.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20221029.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221026.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221029.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 18 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 225 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 308.43 MiB Size of dropped packages:336.43 KiB Size of upgraded packages: 9.76 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: -629.16 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker ppc64le Path: Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20221029.n.0.ppc64le.tar.xz = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Python_Classroom vagrant-libvirt x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Vagrant-Rawhide-20221026.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-libvirt.box Image: Python_Classroom vagrant-virtualbox x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Vagrant-Rawhide-20221026.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box Image: Python_Classroom live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20221026.n.0.iso Image: Python_Classroom raw-xz aarch64 Path: Labs/aarch64/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Rawhide-20221026.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: golang-github-alecthomas-chroma-2-2.3.0-2.fc38 Summary: A general purpose syntax highlighter in pure Go RPMs:golang-github-alecthomas-chroma-2 golang-github-alecthomas-chroma-2-devel Size:20.10 MiB Package: golang-github-charmbracelet-harmonica-0.2.0-1.fc38 Summary: A simple, physics-based animation library RPMs:golang-github-charmbracelet-harmonica-devel Size:15.36 KiB Package: golang-github-moby-swarmkit-2-2.0.0-0.3.pre1.20221009git139c54b.fc38 Summary: Toolkit for orchestrating distributed systems at any scale RPMs:golang-github-moby-swarmkit-2 golang-github-moby-swarmkit-2-devel Size:107.38 MiB Package: golang-github-rootless-containers-rootlesskit-1.0.1-1.fc38 Summary: Linux-native "fake root" for implementing rootless containers RPMs:golang-github-rootless-containers-rootlesskit golang-github-rootless-containers-rootlesskit-devel Size:18.61 MiB Package: libipuz-0.2.0-1.fc38 Summary: Library for parsing .ipuz puzzle files RPMs:libipuz libipuz-devel libipuz-tests Size:509.93 KiB Package: python-azure-mgmt-quota-1.0.0~b2-2.fc38 Summary: Microsoft Azure Quota Management Client Library for Python RPMs:python3-azure-mgmt-quota Size:69.38 KiB Package: python-puzpy-0.2.4-1.fc38 Summary: Python crossword puzzle library RPMs:python3-puzpy Size:30.66 KiB Package: python-tpm2-pytss-1.2.0-1.fc38 Summary: TPM 2.0 TSS Bindings for Python RPMs:python3-tpm2-pytss Size:1.56 MiB Package: python-xattr-0.10.0-2.fc38 Summary: Python wrapper for extended filesystem attributes RPMs:python3-xattr Size:182.90 KiB Package: python3.12-3.12.0~a1-2.fc38 Summary: Version 3.12 of the Python interpreter RPMs:python3.12 python3.12-debug python3.12-devel python3.12-idle python3.12-libs python3.12-test python3.12-tkinter Size:145.37 MiB Package: retsnoop-0.9.2-2.fc38 Summary: A tool for investigating kernel error call stacks RPMs:retsnoop Size:3.06 MiB Package: rubygem-optimist-3.0.1-1.fc38 Summary: Commandline option parser for Ruby RPMs:rubygem-optimist rubygem-optimist-doc Size:351.66 KiB Package: rust-concat-idents-1.1.3-1.fc38 Summary: Allows concatenating multiple identifiers and using them everywhere RPMs:rust-concat-idents+default-devel rust-concat-idents-devel Size:23.17 KiB Package: rust-io-uring-0.5.8-1.fc38 Summary: Low-level io_uring userspace interface for Rust RPMs:rust-io-uring+bindgen-devel rust-io-uring+default-devel rust-io-uring+io_safety-devel rust-io-uring+overwrite-devel rust-io-uring+unstable-devel rust-io-uring-devel Size:83.53 KiB Package: rust-pci-driver-0.1.2-1.fc38 Summary: PCI/PCIe driver development library RPMs:rust-pci-driver+_unsafe-op-in-unsafe-fn-devel rust-pci-driver+default-devel rust-pci-driver+nix-devel rust-pci-driver+vfio-devel rust-pci-driver-devel Size:86.96 KiB Package: rust-pretty-bytes-0.2.0-1.fc38 Summary: Convert bytes to a human readable string RPMs:pretty-bytes rust-pretty-bytes+default-devel rust-pretty-bytes-devel Size:903.35 KiB Package: swig-4.1.0-1.module_f38+15666+d520ad2c Summary: Connects C/C++/Objective C to some high-level programming languages RPMs:ccache-swig swig swig-doc swig-gdb Size:10.04 MiB Package: xbyak-6.63-3.fc38 Summary: A C++ JIT assembler for x86 RPMs:xbyak-devel Size:108.71 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: rust-teloxide-0.3.4-5.fc37 Summary: Elegant Telegram bots framework for Rust RPMs:rust-teloxide+bincode-devel rust-teloxide+bincode-serializer-devel rust-teloxide+cbor-serializer-devel rust-teloxide+default-devel rust-teloxide+serde_cbor-devel rust-teloxide-devel Size:336.43 KiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package:
Re: [Test-Announce] 2022-10-31 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 37 Blocker Review Meeting
On Sat, 2022-10-29 at 02:37 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 12:44 AM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > > # F36 Blocker Review meeting > > If this was a test to see if anyone noticed the title being > wrong, I am afraid I have failed that test for the entire > cycle. Aaaand so did I! https://media.giphy.com/media/uhv7KzWW3OWYM/giphy.gif I swear I proofread these things. Just apparently not hard enough. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
