SPDX Statistics - Independence of Lithuania edition

[Miroslav Suchý]

tl;dr - you converted 892 tags in 14 days, statistics script now does not mention recently introduced packages and you 
can put your package on ignore list


Two weeks ago we had:


* 23060 spec files in Fedora

* 29449license tags in all spec files

* 21194 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet

* 8439 tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`


Today we have:

* 23107 spec files in Fedora

* 29503license tags in all spec files

* 20302 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet

* 8096 tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`

The list of packages needed to be converted is again here:

https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final.txt

List by package maintainers is here

https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final-maintainers.txt

New version of fedora-license-data will be released tomorrow

Legal docs and especially

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/

will be updated too.

I updated the progress in this spreadsheet:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QVMEzXWML-6_Mrlln02axFAaRKCQ8zE807rpCjus-8s/edit?usp=sharing

You converted 892 license tags in 14 days. Amazing!

New projection when we will be finished is 2024-04-24. Pure linear 
approximation.

Now, the script ignores packages that started after 2022-08-01, because by that time SPDX for License tags has been 
already mandatory.


If your package does not have neither git-log entry nor spec-changelog entry mentioning SPDX and you know your license 
tag matches SPDX formula, you can put your package on ignore list


https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/ignore-packages.txt

Either pull-request or email to me is fine. I already put there some packages 
that has been reported in past.

Tip:
SPDX formula allows to list licenses that are not on SPDX list, is uses LicenseRef-* notation. In Fedora we use it on 
few places. You can read about it here 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-review-process/#_what_is_licenseref



Why Independence of Lithuania? Because today - 11th March 1990 Lithuania declared an independece. It was first republic 
from Soviet Union. It was not easy and several people had to pay by their life.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_of_the_Re-Establishment_of_the_State_of_Lithuania


Do you hesitate how to proceed with the migration? Please follow

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/update-existing-packages/

or attend SPDX office hours (see different thread in this mailing list)

Miroslav


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2172819] perl-SQL-Statement-1.414-10.fc39 tests produce a lot of warnings: Use of uninitialized value $unkpos in subtraction (-) at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Text/Balanced.pm line 1008

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172819

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-97fcf55f4b has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-97fcf55f4b

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172819
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2174484] perl-Date-Manip-6.91 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174484

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
   Fixed In Version||perl-Date-Manip-6.91-1.fc37
Last Closed||2023-03-11 04:25:26



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-bf59a643a0 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174484
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2175432] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000148 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175432

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Test2-Suite-0.000148-1
   ||.fc38
Last Closed||2023-03-11 03:15:11



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-e4041fe3de has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175432
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2175585] perl-Class-Method-Modifiers-2.15 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175585

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Class-Method-Modifiers |perl-Class-Method-Modifiers
   |-2.15-1.fc39|-2.15-1.fc39
   ||perl-Class-Method-Modifiers
   ||-2.15-1.fc38



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-0ac3058d9c has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175585
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2173292] perl-Prima-1.68 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173292

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Prima-1.68-1.fc39  |perl-Prima-1.68-1.fc39
   ||perl-Prima-1.68.2-1.fc38
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
Last Closed||2023-03-11 03:14:26



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-0ea83b3e72 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173292
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2142502] Upgrade perl-Image-ExifTool to 12.50

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142502

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
   Fixed In Version||perl-Image-ExifTool-12.50-1
   ||.fc38
Last Closed||2023-03-11 03:14:33



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-cb7c541418 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142502
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2174891] perl-Prima-1.68002 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174891

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Prima-1.68.2-1.fc39|perl-Prima-1.68.2-1.fc39
   ||perl-Prima-1.68.2-1.fc38
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
Last Closed||2023-03-11 03:14:31



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-0ea83b3e72 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174891
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2175591] perl-DBD-Pg-3.16.1 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175591

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
   Fixed In Version|perl-DBD-Pg-3.16.1-1.fc39   |perl-DBD-Pg-3.16.1-1.fc39
   ||perl-DBD-Pg-3.16.1-1.fc38
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
Last Closed||2023-03-11 03:14:22



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-e1a369bf26 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175591
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2174261] perl-Prima-1.68001 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174261

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-Prima-1.68.1-1.fc39|perl-Prima-1.68.1-1.fc39
   ||perl-Prima-1.68.2-1.fc38
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2023-03-11 03:14:29



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-0ea83b3e72 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174261
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2175475] perl-Perl-Critic-1.150 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175475

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-Perl-Critic-1.150-1.fc
   ||38
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
Last Closed||2023-03-11 03:14:09



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-1a11dd77b1 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175475
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2175305] perl-GraphViz-2.26 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175305

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-GraphViz-2.26-1.fc39   |perl-GraphViz-2.26-1.fc39
   ||perl-GraphViz-2.26-1.fc38
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2023-03-11 03:14:15



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-f802ff5e54 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175305
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2175125] perl-CGI-4.56 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175125

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-CGI-4.56-1.fc39|perl-CGI-4.56-1.fc39
   ||perl-CGI-4.56-1.fc38
Last Closed||2023-03-11 03:13:18



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-4839495a1b has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175125
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2174457] perl-Config-Perl-V-0.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174457

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Config-Perl-V-0.36-1.f |perl-Config-Perl-V-0.36-1.f
   |c39 |c39
   ||perl-Config-Perl-V-0.36-1.f
   ||c38
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2023-03-11 03:12:41



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-3191bc3f85 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174457
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2174402] perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.50 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174402

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.50-1.fc3 |perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.50-1.fc3
   |9   |9
   ||perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.50-1.fc3
   ||8



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-f3895c13fb has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174402
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2174023] perl-Rose-DB-0.785 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174023

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-Rose-DB-0.785-2.fc38
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
Last Closed||2023-03-11 03:12:20



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-d31fc4945e has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174023
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2173731] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173731

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72-1. |perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72-1.
   |fc39|fc39
   |perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72-1. |perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72-1.
   |fc36|fc36
   |perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72-1. |perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72-1.
   |fc37|fc37
   ||perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72-1.
   ||fc38



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-222504c956 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173731
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2173461] perl-Test-Directory-0.052 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173461

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Test-Directory-0.052-1 |perl-Test-Directory-0.052-1
   |.fc39   |.fc39
   |perl-Test-Directory-0.052-1 |perl-Test-Directory-0.052-1
   |.fc36   |.fc36
   |perl-Test-Directory-0.052-1 |perl-Test-Directory-0.052-1
   |.fc37   |.fc37
   ||perl-Test-Directory-0.052-1
   ||.fc38



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-3bc4a051a0 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173461
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2173116] perl-SQL-Translator-1.63 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173116

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-SQL-Translator-1.63-1. |perl-SQL-Translator-1.63-1.
   |fc39|fc39
   ||perl-SQL-Translator-1.63-1.
   ||fc38
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-5e787667c6 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173116
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2172742] perl-Geo-ShapeFile-3.03 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172742

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-Geo-ShapeFile-3.03-1.f |perl-Geo-ShapeFile-3.03-1.f
   |c39 |c39
   ||perl-Geo-ShapeFile-3.03-1.f
   ||c38
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2023-03-11 03:10:58



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-3f80d571c6 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172742
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2144909] perl-Log-Any-1.713 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144909

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
   Fixed In Version||perl-Log-Any-1.713-1.fc38
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
Last Closed||2023-03-11 03:09:03



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-099b9e819a has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144909
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2173127] perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.16 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173127

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.16-1.fc3 |perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.16-1.fc3
   |6   |6
   |perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.16-1.fc3 |perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.16-1.fc3
   |7   |7
   ||perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.16-1.fc3
   ||8



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-748e811334 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173127
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2172670] perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.15 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172670

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.16-1.fc3 |perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.16-1.fc3
   |7   |7
   ||perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.16-1.fc3
   ||8



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-748e811334 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172670
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: F39 proposal: FontAwesome6 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Jerry James]

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 2:16 PM Matthew Miller  wrote:
> > Some user-facing applications will be able to display the latest
> > versions of the FontAwesome icons, which have undergone a number of
> > updates and cleanups to provide a more pleasing look.  In addition,
> > many new icons have been added in the 5.x and 6.x versions.  For
> > example, version 6.x contains a Fedora icon, while previous versions
> > do not.
>
> Version 5.x contains an an unauthorized not-so-great single-color hackup of
> the "classic" logo. Version 6.x contains an authorized rendition of the
> legit current logo.
>
> Is 6.x backwards compatible with 5?

Yes, 6.x is backwards compatible with 5.x.  The plan includes retiring
the fontawesome5-fonts package, so that unauthorized not-so-great
single-color hackup will get the boot as part of this change.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2023-03-07)

[Kevin Kofler via devel]

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 05:49:24AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
>> So basically we are stuck with the status quo. Meaning that there is
>> still nothing preventing an already rejected feature from being
>> surprisingly reconsidered after the change deadline, and no guarantee
>> that the "effort to notify people" is actually going to happen
>> (especially in the future, as FESCo composition changes). Sad. I had got
>> the impression that there were consensus in FESCo to improve the
>> situation. Apparently, that was a false impression, unfortunately.
> 
> Your assumption of bad faith from elected representatives of the community
> is worrying. You manage to imply bad intentions not only from the current
> group, but even from the future ones, yet unknown. Quite an achievement! I
> think that you are under a false impression that repeating your argument
> ad infinitum is useful for something.

Where in the paragraph you quoted have I written anything about bad faith? A 
lack of notification can happen by accident in good faith, as apparently 
happened in the case that triggered the whole debate. (At least, Neal Gompa 
swears it was an accident.) And without any kind of policy enforcing it, a 
pledge to "make an effort to notify people" is not a guarantee. That is all 
I stated.

Another issue that was not addressed by the proposal at all is that the 
change at stake was resubmitted too late, after the change submission 
deadline, and hence should not have been allowed on that ground.

In addition, being elected is not sufficient to guarantee good faith, as can 
be seen in politics. Not to mention that, in Fedora elections, there is 
often not enough competition for voters to vote out candidates they do not 
trust.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2177338] New: perl-Lexical-SealRequireHints-0.012 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177338

Bug ID: 2177338
   Summary: perl-Lexical-SealRequireHints-0.012 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Lexical-SealRequireHints
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, p...@city-fan.org,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 0.012
Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.012
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.011-21.fc38
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Lexical-SealRequireHints/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3020/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Lexical-SealRequireHints


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177338
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fwd: License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-or-later

[Matthew Miller]

On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 11:41:09AM -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > I am doing the conversion of license tags in my projects and i have a
> > project where some files are under the GPL-2.0-or-later license and other
> > under the GPL-3.0-or-later license. Perhaps this has been mentioned
> > somewhere but i did not notice, but is it possible to merge these 2 into
> > just GPL-3.0-or-later and thus reduce the specification to only one license?
> 
> Per the licensing guidelines¹
> 
> The spec file License: field consists of an enumeration of
> all licenses covering any code or other material contained
> in the corresponding binary RPM. This enumeration must take
> the form of an SPDX license expression. No further analysis
> as to the "effective" license should be done.
> 
> ¹ https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_basic_policy

Yeah, this is a change from previous guidance. Instead of trying to calculate
the effect, just state what's there. Even if it makes the expression kind of
long and unwieldy.

-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: F39 proposal: FontAwesome6 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Matthew Miller]

> Some user-facing applications will be able to display the latest
> versions of the FontAwesome icons, which have undergone a number of
> updates and cleanups to provide a more pleasing look.  In addition,
> many new icons have been added in the 5.x and 6.x versions.  For
> example, version 6.x contains a Fedora icon, while previous versions
> do not.

Version 5.x contains an an unauthorized not-so-great single-color hackup of
the "classic" logo. Version 6.x contains an authorized rendition of the
legit current logo.

Is 6.x backwards compatible with 5?


-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2023-03-07)

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 10:59:32AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> 
> Note that at least 2 of us voted for this proposal with a note that it's
> better than status quo and hence not worth rejecting, but we'd rather see a
> better solution.

I think there's a desire to try and prevent surprises, but also to not
add a bunch more process to something that is already the heaviest
process we have. 

I did propose we change it to apply to 'formally' rejected and announced
proposals (which would let us reject proposals as written in a meeting,
but conditionally accept them later in the same meeting without having
to make them go through the entire process again), but that didn't
garner enough support.

> I've reopened https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2951 and will try to find a
> compromise that has a chance of approval.

But shouldn't it have to start completely over since we rejected it?
:)

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora 38 compose report: 20230310.n.1 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-38-20230309.n.0
NEW: Fedora-38-20230310.n.1

= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images:  4
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   61
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   1.35 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   -11.02 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: Kinoite/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-x86_64-38-20230310.n.1.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Phosh raw-xz aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/images/Fedora-Phosh-38-20230309.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz
Image: LXQt raw-xz aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/images/Fedora-LXQt-38-20230309.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz
Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: Silverblue/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-38-20230309.n.0.iso
Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree ppc64le
Path: Kinoite/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-ppc64le-38-20230309.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  bluedevil-5.27.2-1.fc38
Old package:  bluedevil-5.27.1-1.fc38
Summary:  Bluetooth stack for KDE
RPMs: bluedevil
Size: 2.83 MiB
Size change:  -34 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 28 2023 Marc Deop i Argem??  - 5.27.2-1
  - 5.27.2


Package:  breeze-gtk-5.27.2-1.fc38
Old package:  breeze-gtk-5.27.1-1.fc38
Summary:  Breeze widget theme for GTK
RPMs: breeze-gtk breeze-gtk-common breeze-gtk-gtk2 breeze-gtk-gtk3 
breeze-gtk-gtk4
Size: 406.54 KiB
Size change:  7 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 28 2023 Marc Deop i Argem??  - 5.27.2-1
  - 5.27.2


Package:  fedora-release-38-0.30
Old package:  fedora-release-38-0.26
Summary:  Fedora release files
RPMs: fedora-release fedora-release-budgie fedora-release-cinnamon 
fedora-release-cloud fedora-release-common fedora-release-compneuro 
fedora-release-container fedora-release-coreos fedora-release-designsuite 
fedora-release-i3 fedora-release-identity-basic fedora-release-identity-budgie 
fedora-release-identity-cinnamon fedora-release-identity-cloud 
fedora-release-identity-compneuro fedora-release-identity-container 
fedora-release-identity-coreos fedora-release-identity-designsuite 
fedora-release-identity-i3 fedora-release-identity-iot 
fedora-release-identity-kde fedora-release-identity-kinoite 
fedora-release-identity-lxqt fedora-release-identity-matecompiz 
fedora-release-identity-sericea fedora-release-identity-server 
fedora-release-identity-silverblue fedora-release-identity-snappy 
fedora-release-identity-soas fedora-release-identity-sway 
fedora-release-identity-workstation fedora-release-identity-xfce 
fedora-release-iot fedora-release-kde fedora-release-kinoite 
fedora-release-lxqt fedora-release-matecompiz fedora-release-ostree-desktop 
fedora-release-sericea fedora-release-server fedora-release-silverblue 
fedora-release-snappy fedora-release-soas fedora-release-sway 
fedora-release-workstation fedora-release-xfce
Size: 609.84 KiB
Size change:  7.70 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Mar 02 2023 Timoth??e Ravier  - 38-0.27
  - Keep upstream default shutdown timeout for some variants

  * Thu Mar 02 2023 Dusty Mabe  - 38-0.28
  - make recent shutdown timeout conf filename more appropriate

  * Thu Mar 02 2023 Dusty Mabe  - 38-0.29
  - Fix invalid longer-default-shutdown-timeout.conf

  * Sat Mar 04 2023 Dusty Mabe  - 38-0.30
  - Enable preset for ssh-host-keys-migration.service


Package:  flatpak-kcm-5.27.2.2-1.fc38
Old package:  flatpak-kcm-5.27.1-1.fc38
Summary:  Flatpak Permissions Management KCM
RPMs: flatpak-kcm
Size: 533.22 KiB
Size change:  8.44 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 28 2023 Marc Deop i Argem??  - 5.27.2-1
  - 5.27.2

  * Wed Mar 01 2023 Marc Deop i Argem??  - 
5.27.2.2-1
  - 5.27.2.2


Package:  gnome-shell-44~beta-3.fc38
Old package:  gnome-shell-44~beta-2.fc38
Summary:  Window management and application launching for GNOME
RPMs: gnome-shell
Size: 6.86 MiB
Size change:  -2.21 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Mar 05 2023 Ray Strode  - 44~beta-3
  - Fix slowdown in at shutdown
Resolves: #2174753


Package:  gnupg2-2.4.0-3.fc38
Old package:  gnupg2-2.4.0-2.fc38
Summary:  Utility for secure communication and data storage
RPMs: gnupg2 gnupg2-smime
Size: 11.54 MiB
Size change:  -5.26 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Mar 03 2023 Jakub Jelen  - 2.4.0-3
  - Revert introduction of the RFC4880bis draft into defaults


Package:  grub2-breeze-theme-5.27.2-1.fc38
Old package:  grub2-breeze-theme-5.27.1-1.fc38
Summary:  Breeze theme for GRUB
RPMs: grub2-breeze-theme
Size: 10.08 MiB
Size change:  -15.08 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 28 2023 Marc Deop i Argem??  - 5.27.2-1
  - 5.27.2


Package:  kactivitymanagerd-5.27.2-1.fc38
Old package:  kactivitymanagerd-5.27.1-1.fc38
Summary:  Plasma service to manage user's activities

Re: Degradated modules support

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 08:54:06AM +, Chris Kelley wrote:
> >
> > The above is done by about 2.5 people (counting multiple volunteers as 1
> > person). This goes up at times and goes down but for the last year has been
> > about that.
> 
> An aside - how/where does one volunteer to help releng?

Hang out in the #fedora-releng / #releng:fedoraproject.org room and ask
questions and offer to do things. Join in on the weekly meeting in
#fedora-meeting-3 / meeting-3:fedoraproject.org at 16UTC. Chime in on
tickets if you would like to help with them 
( https://pagure.io/releng/)
Help debug failed compose issues by investigating things at
https://pagure.io/releng/failed-composes/issues
Tons of things to do, depending on your skillsets and desire.

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

[Ben Cotton]

F38 Beta is go, so it's time to look at final blockers. The current
target is the early target date (18 April).


Action summary


Accepted blockers
-

1. fcoe-utils — anaconda failed to detect the fcoe target(only affects
ixgbe) — NEW
ACTION: Maintainer to diagnose issue

2. gtk4 — With GTK 4.9.1 , Nautilus' target for "Move To" or "Copy To"
operations is unexpected and can be invalid — NEW
ACTION: Upstream to diagnose issue

3. sddm — Virtual keyboard (on-screen) not working at sddm-wayland-plasma — NEW
ACTION: Maintainers to diagnose issue or revert to using X11


Proposed blockers
-

1. anaconda — Anaconda Rawhide warning does not switch to selected
language — ON_QA
ACTION: QA to verify FEDORA-2023-6cfa0fe11e

2. gnome-boxes — Boxes seem to end up in a loop when trying to create
a new VM — ON_QA
ACTION: QA to verify gnome-boxes-44~rc-1.fc38

3. gnome-contacts — Contacts merge incorrectly — NEW
ACTION: Upstream to confirm expected behavior

4. gnome-photos — crash when using color adjustment sliders — NEW
ACTION: Upstream to diagnose issue

5. gnome-photos — Memory exhaustion when editing a cropped photo — NEW
ACTION: Upstream to diagnose issue

6. gnome-photos — unable to add a new picture to an album after delete
and undo the delete option — NEW
ACTION: lnie to file upstream issue
NEEDINFO: lnie

7. mutter — Session crash when reverting Display settings — POST
ACTION: Upstream to merge MR 2901

8. nautilus — Dragging files is Nautilus doesn't work as expected,
quick movements result in a selection box instead — NEW
ACTION: Upstream to fix issue

9. sddm — SDDM doesn't start in basic graphics mode in BIOS mode — NEW
ACTION: Maintainer to diagnose issue

10. totem — totem crashes everytime when users try to delete a video — NEW
ACTION: lnie to file upstream issue
NEEDINFO: lnie

Bug-by-bug detail
=

Accepted blockers
-

1. fcoe-utils — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2171350 — NEW
anaconda failed to detect the fcoe target(only affects ixgbe)

The installer does not detect attached FCOE storage using ixgbe.
SELInux warnings appear, but it runs in passive mode, so that is not
the root cause.

2. gtk4 — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173891 — NEW
With GTK 4.9.1 , Nautilus' target for "Move To" or "Copy To"
operations is unexpected and can be invalid

Copying or moving a file to a directory that is not empty results in
failure. Empty directory targets work. Filed upstream as
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/5438

3. sddm — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174563 — NEW
Virtual keyboard (on-screen) not working at sddm-wayland-plasma

The virtual keyboard at the login screen does not appear when you
click the appropriate button. This appears to be a Wayland-specific
issue; reverting to X11 allows the keyboard to work as expected.

Proposed blockers
-

1. anaconda — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165762 — ON_QA
Anaconda Rawhide warning does not switch to selected language

After switching language from an auto-detected language, some elements
of the installer do not switch. Update FEDORA-2023-6cfa0fe11e contains
a candidate fix.

2, gnome-boxes — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175708 — ON_QA
Boxes seem to end up in a loop when trying to create a new VM

Creating new VMs results in an infinite loop. Existing VMs can launch
successfully. Fixed in upstream commit 26e51a32, which in
gnome-boxes-44~rc-1.fc38.

3. gnome-contacts — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176166 — NEW
Contacts merge incorrectly

Merging contacts can result in one of the contacts still
existing-but-empty, or other unexpected states. This appears to be an
issue with the UI being unintuitive. Filed upstream as
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-contacts/-/issues/300 with
several related issues filed to make the UI clearer.

4. gnome-photos — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176038 — NEW
crash when using color adjustment sliders

Adjusting color on jpeg (not png) images can result in the application
crashing. There is question about whether or not this constitutes
"basic functionality". Filed upstream as
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-photos/-/issues/209

5. gnome-photos — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176043 — NEW
Memory exhaustion when editing a cropped photo

When Shadows or Highlights sliders are changed on a cropped photo (but
not uncropped photos), gnome-photos goes into an infinite cycle
consuming CPU and memory until killed by the OOM killer. This behavior
is observed at least as far back as F36. Filed upstream as
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-photos/-/issues/205

6. gnome-photos — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176732 — NEW
unable to add a new picture to an album after delete and undo the delete option

Deleting an album and then un-deleting does not appear to fully undelete it.

7. mutter — 

perl-SDL license correction

[Petr Pisar]

perl-SDL-2.548-17.fc39 will correct a license tag from (LGPL-2.1-or-later) to
(LGPL-2.1-or-later AND (GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl)).

-- Petr


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2177189] perl-SDL will fail to build with GCC 14 because of an implicit _calc_offset() declaration

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-SDL-2.548-17.fc39
 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar  ---
Thanks. I pushed this fix and other my improvements. I tested them locally. I
will build perl-SDL in Koji once sld12-compat is fixed.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2175955] biber-2.19 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175955
Bug 2175955 depends on bug 2176089, which changed state.

Bug 2176089 Summary: Upgrade biblatex to 3.19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176089

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175955
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2175955] biber-2.19 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175955

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Last Closed||2023-03-10 14:25:34




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175955
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

RE: Package Tutorial bug - another suggestion, section vs. macro

[Kenneth Goldman]

Here's another "surprise for the new user" that I suggest being added.

What does the % character mean?

Sometimes it's the beginning of a section.  Sometimes it's a macro.

I see now that the web page color codes the two differently,
but that's not obvious.

It would be helpful to explain that early and provide links
or other instructions on how to find the list of each.

Someone posted /usr/lib/rpm/macros for the list
of macros and suggested rpm -E macro to
view the expansion.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2177189] perl-SDL will fail to build with GCC 14 because of an implicit _calc_offset() declaration

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|hdego...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2173510] perl-SDL-2.548-16.fc38 FTBFS: tests hang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173510

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||2177189





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189
[Bug 2177189] perl-SDL will fail to build with GCC 14 because of an implicit
_calc_offset() declaration
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173510
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2177189] perl-SDL will fail to build with GCC 14 because of an implicit _calc_offset() declaration

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||2173510





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173510
[Bug 2173510] perl-SDL-2.548-16.fc38 FTBFS: tests hang
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2177189] perl-SDL will fail to build with GCC 14 because of an implicit _calc_offset() declaration

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189



--- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede  ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #2)
> Yes, please add me as a comaintainer. My account is ppisar.

Done, you are a co-admin of the package now, thank you for your help with this!

Note both for now and for the future if you have any fixes / improvements to
commit to the package just go for it.

There is no need to coordinate, I seldomly touch this package so the chances of
(git) conflicts are very minimal.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Dogtag-pki is not installable on F38/Rawhide because it fails the GPG check even if you attempt to skip the check

[Chris Kelley]

Thanks all for the input.

Maybe there was some issue in COPR and/or rawhide at the
> time those packages were signed which caused them to fail
> verification now?  It may be worth trying to rebuild them to
> see if they can be properly signed?
>
I resubmitted the affected packages and now everything works - thanks for
the suggestion!

On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 at 20:42, Todd Zullinger  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Chris Kelley wrote:
> > TL;DR dogtag-pki is not installable on F38/Rawhide because
> > it fails the GPG check (F37 and prior are fine), even if
> > --nogpgcheck is specified, and I don't understand why.
> >
> > 1) Why does the key not work?
> > 2) Why does --nogpgcheck not work?
>
> It seems like it must be related to the issues reported
> recently with respect to changes in the rpm signature
> backend & stricter crypto-policies, but I don't see _why_
> they are failing.  They don't appear to be using SHA1 or DSA
> algorithms. :/
>
> I think it is suspicious that the three packages which fail
> to verify are the three which have not been built within the
> past week or so.  Attempting an install in a rawhide
> container from today, then checking the package cache after
> it fails simply reports the rpm signature as BAD.
>
> [root@8f5fc423842b /]# rpm -Kvv
> dogtag-jss-5.4.0-0.1.alpha1.20230227143934UTC.0c4012e6.fc39.x86_64.rpm
> D: loading keyring from rpmdb
> D: PRAGMA secure_delete = OFF: 0
> D: PRAGMA case_sensitive_like = ON: 0
> D:  read h# 150
> Header SHA256 digest: OK
> Header SHA1 digest: OK
> D: added key gpg-pubkey-18b8e74c-62f2920f to keyring
> D:  read h# 160
> Header SHA256 digest: OK
> Header SHA1 digest: OK
> D: added key gpg-pubkey-20de059c-5c7ffdbe to keyring
> /var/cache/dnf/copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:
> group_pki:master-7092f479845efeda/packages/dogtag-jss-5.4.0-0.1.alpha1.20230227143934UTC.0c4012e6.fc39.x86_64.rpm:
> Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 20de059c: BAD
> Header SHA256 digest: OK
> Header SHA1 digest: OK
> Payload SHA256 digest: OK
> V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 20de059c: BAD
> MD5 digest: OK
>
> Maybe there was some issue in COPR and/or rawhide at the
> time those packages were signed which caused them to fail
> verification now?  It may be worth trying to rebuild them to
> see if they can be properly signed?
>
> --
> Todd
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2173510] perl-SDL-2.548-16.fc38 FTBFS: tests hang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173510



--- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar  ---
s/test/patch/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173510
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2173510] perl-SDL-2.548-16.fc38 FTBFS: tests hang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173510



--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar  ---
I confirm the upstream test fixes this problem. If you don't have time, I can
apply the patch to the Fedora sdl12-compat package.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173510
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2177189] perl-SDL will fail to build with GCC 14 because of an implicit _calc_offset() declaration

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189



--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar  ---
Yes, please add me as a comaintainer. My account is ppisar.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2177189] perl-SDL will fail to build with GCC 14 because of an implicit _calc_offset() declaration

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189



--- Comment #1 from Hans de Goede  ---
Petr, thank you for the pointer to the fix and also thank you for your work on
bug 2173510 (the tests hang).

I could really use a co-maintainer for perl-SDL, shall I add you as a
co-maintainer?

If yes, what is your FAS accountname ?

Then you can add the mentioned pull-req as a downstream patch yourself for now
and lets also disable the tests (or just the problematic one) for now with a
link to the upstream sdl12-compat issue ?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2173510] perl-SDL-2.548-16.fc38 FTBFS: tests hang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173510

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Link ID||Github
   ||libsdl-org/sdl12-compat/iss
   ||ues/275




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173510
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2173510] perl-SDL-2.548-16.fc38 FTBFS: tests hang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173510

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|perl-SDL|sdl12-compat
 QA Contact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |
 CC||igor.ra...@gmail.com,
   ||ngomp...@gmail.com
   Assignee|hdego...@redhat.com |ngomp...@gmail.com



--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar  ---
This is triggered by upgrading sdl12-compat from 1.2.52 to 1.2.56.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173510
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2173510] perl-SDL-2.548-16.fc38 FTBFS: tests hang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173510



--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar  ---
Plain "perl -Iblib/{lib,arch} t/core_video.t" without an X server also hangs.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173510
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2177189] New: perl-SDL will fail to build with GCC 14 because of an implicit _calc_offset() declaration

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189

Bug ID: 2177189
   Summary: perl-SDL will fail to build with GCC 14 because of an
implicit _calc_offset() declaration
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
   URL: https://github.com/PerlGameDev/SDL/pull/299
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-SDL
  Keywords: Patch
  Assignee: hdego...@redhat.com
  Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: hdego...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



I recommend applying  patch to fix
building perl-SDL with GCC 14.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230310.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230309.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230310.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  4
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages:   96
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  4.12 MiB
Size of dropped packages:4.03 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   4.61 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   2.11 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Design_suite live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Design_suite-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20230310.n.0.iso
Image: KDE live aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-KDE-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20230310.n.0.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: mathjax3-3.2.2-1.fc39
Summary: JavaScript library to render math in the browser
RPMs:mathjax3
Size:2.12 MiB

Package: painless-password-rotation-0.3-1.fc39
Summary: Manages root password rotation with Hashicorp Vault
RPMs:painless-password-rotation
Size:13.08 KiB

Package: vcdimager-2.0.1-16.fc39
Summary: VideoCD (pre-)mastering and ripping tool
RPMs:vcdimager vcdimager-devel vcdimager-libs
Size:1.81 MiB

Package: wslay-1.1.1-1.fc39
Summary: Lightweight WebSocket library in C
RPMs:wslay wslay-devel
Size:190.21 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: libgit2_1.4-1.4.6-2.fc39
Summary: C implementation of the Git core methods as a library with a solid API
RPMs:libgit2_1.4 libgit2_1.4-devel
Size:4.03 MiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  CuraEngine-1:5.3.0-1.fc39
Old package:  CuraEngine-1:4.13.1-6.fc39
Summary:  Engine for processing 3D models into G-code instructions for 3D 
printers
RPMs: CuraEngine
Size: 4.25 MiB
Size change:  1.23 MiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Mar 08 2023 Tom Callaway  - 1:5.3.0-1
  - update to 5.3.0


Package:  NetworkManager-1:1.43.3-1.fc39
Old package:  NetworkManager-1:1.42.0-1.fc39
Summary:  Network connection manager and user applications
RPMs: NetworkManager NetworkManager-adsl NetworkManager-bluetooth 
NetworkManager-cloud-setup NetworkManager-config-connectivity-fedora 
NetworkManager-config-server NetworkManager-dispatcher-routing-rules 
NetworkManager-initscripts-ifcfg-rh NetworkManager-initscripts-updown 
NetworkManager-libnm NetworkManager-libnm-devel NetworkManager-ovs 
NetworkManager-ppp NetworkManager-team NetworkManager-tui NetworkManager-wifi 
NetworkManager-wwan
Size: 25.21 MiB
Size change:  -47.02 KiB

Package:  NetworkManager-pptp-1:1.2.12-1.fc39
Old package:  NetworkManager-pptp-1:1.2.10-3.fc38
Summary:  NetworkManager VPN plugin for PPTP
RPMs: NetworkManager-pptp NetworkManager-pptp-gnome
Size: 748.95 KiB
Size change:  -75.43 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Mar 09 2023 Lubomir Rintel  - 1.2.12-1
  - Update to 1.2.12 release


Package:  autorandr-1.13.3-1.fc39
Old package:  autorandr-1.12.1-3.fc38
Summary:  Automatically select a display configuration based on connected 
devices
RPMs: autorandr autorandr-bash-completion autorandr-zsh-completion
Size: 62.30 KiB
Size change:  3.03 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Mar 09 2023 Peter Kotvan  - 1.13.2-1
  - Update to 1.13.2.

  * Thu Mar 09 2023 Peter Kotvan  - 1.13.3-1
  - Update to 1.13.3.


Package:  awscli-1.27.88-1.fc39
Old package:  awscli-1.27.87-1.fc39
Summary:  Universal Command Line Environment for AWS
RPMs: awscli
Size: 3.29 MiB
Size change:  -129 B
Changelog:
  * Thu Mar 09 2023 Gwyn Ciesla  - 1.27.88-1
  - 1.27.88


Package:  binutils-2.40-5.fc39
Old package:  binutils-2.40-2.fc39
Summary:  A GNU collection of binary utilities
RPMs: binutils binutils-devel binutils-gold binutils-gprofng
Size: 60.48 MiB
Size change:  6.86 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Mar 06 2023 Nick Clifton   - 2.40-4
  - Spec file: Add libsframe.a to the (fake) libbfd.so.  (#2174841)

  * Wed Mar 08 2023 Nick Clifton   - 2.40-5
  - Spec file: Rebuild libsframe.a with -fPIC enabled.  (#2174841)


Package:  blender-1:3.4.1-14.fc39
Old package:  blender-1:3.4.1-11.fc39
Summary:  3D modeling, animation, rendering and post-production
RPMs: blender blender-rpm-macros
Size: 200.62 MiB
Size change:  -20.69 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Feb 20 2023 Jonathan Wakely  - 1:3.4.1-12
  - Rebuilt for Boost 1.81

  * Wed Mar 01 2023 Luya Tshimbalanga  - 1:3.4.1-13
  - Switch back to embree 3 series

  * Thu Mar 09 2023 Benjamin A. Beasley  - 1:3.4.1-14
  - Fix building with boost >= 1.81 (fix RHBZ#2172445)


Package:  calc-2.14.1.4-1.fc39
Old package:  calc-2.14.1.3-2.fc39
Summary:  Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator
RPMs: calc calc-devel calc-libs calc-stdrc
Size: 3.93 MiB
Size change:  -1.93 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Mar 09 2023 Matthew Miller  - 2.14.1.4-1
  - update to 2.14.1.4 pre-release (building in rawhide only) - convert to
SPDX license identifier


Package:  chromium-111.0.5563

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2023-03-07)

[Miro Hrončok]

On 10. 03. 23 9:59, Hunor Csomortáni wrote:

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 8:46 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
 wrote:


On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 05:49:24AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:

* #2951 Proposal: policy for resubmitting rejected proposals  (zbyszek,
   17:07:47)
   * AGREED: FESCo will make an effort to notify people when proposals
 are resubmitted for voting without a formal change in the process
 rules. A note will be added to FESCo_meeting_process. (+7,0,0)
 (zbyszek, 17:18:25)


So basically we are stuck with the status quo. Meaning that there is still
nothing preventing an already rejected feature from being surprisingly
reconsidered after the change deadline, and no guarantee that the "effort to
notify people" is actually going to happen (especially in the future, as
FESCo composition changes). Sad. I had got the impression that there were
consensus in FESCo to improve the situation. Apparently, that was a false
impression, unfortunately.


Your assumption of bad faith from elected representatives of the community is
worrying. You manage to imply bad intentions not only from the current group,
but even from the future ones, yet unknown. Quite an achievement! I think that
you are under a false impression that repeating your argument ad infinitum is
useful for something.


I agree that Kevin's wording has a negative tone, though I also agree
with his point.

"make an effort" is not a clear and explicit enough wording, and it
leaves room for interpretation, which might lead to questionable
situations in the future, even if everything is going to be done in
good faith.

I also think that the FESCo meeting process is **not** the right place
to regulate this. The change process is regulated by the "Change
policy". The rules for FESCo to reconsider decisions already taken and
communicated to the community should be captured in the same policy
document, as they are part of the same process. Again: this is not
about questioning the good faith of any current or future FESCo
members, rather about the nature of bureaucracies and the need for
clear and consistent regulations in order to reduce the risk of muddy
situations occurring, which can cause conflicts within the community.


Note that at least 2 of us voted for this proposal with a note that it's better 
than status quo and hence not worth rejecting, but we'd rather see a better 
solution.


I've reopened https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2951 and will try to find a 
compromise that has a chance of approval.




General note (not directed at Hunor or Kevin specifically): I encourage more 
folks to run for FESCo, especially if they are not satisfied with how things 
are. FESCo is an elected body that should represent the Fedora developers, but 
we rarely get more than +1 candidates.


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2023-03-07)

[Hunor Csomortáni]

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 8:46 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 05:49:24AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > * #2951 Proposal: policy for resubmitting rejected proposals  (zbyszek,
> > >   17:07:47)
> > >   * AGREED: FESCo will make an effort to notify people when proposals
> > > are resubmitted for voting without a formal change in the process
> > > rules. A note will be added to FESCo_meeting_process. (+7,0,0)
> > > (zbyszek, 17:18:25)
> >
> > So basically we are stuck with the status quo. Meaning that there is still
> > nothing preventing an already rejected feature from being surprisingly
> > reconsidered after the change deadline, and no guarantee that the "effort to
> > notify people" is actually going to happen (especially in the future, as
> > FESCo composition changes). Sad. I had got the impression that there were
> > consensus in FESCo to improve the situation. Apparently, that was a false
> > impression, unfortunately.
>
> Your assumption of bad faith from elected representatives of the community is
> worrying. You manage to imply bad intentions not only from the current group,
> but even from the future ones, yet unknown. Quite an achievement! I think that
> you are under a false impression that repeating your argument ad infinitum is
> useful for something.

I agree that Kevin's wording has a negative tone, though I also agree
with his point.

"make an effort" is not a clear and explicit enough wording, and it
leaves room for interpretation, which might lead to questionable
situations in the future, even if everything is going to be done in
good faith.

I also think that the FESCo meeting process is **not** the right place
to regulate this. The change process is regulated by the "Change
policy". The rules for FESCo to reconsider decisions already taken and
communicated to the community should be captured in the same policy
document, as they are part of the same process. Again: this is not
about questioning the good faith of any current or future FESCo
members, rather about the nature of bureaucracies and the need for
clear and consistent regulations in order to reduce the risk of muddy
situations occurring, which can cause conflicts within the community.

Speaking about conflicts: as I already stated above, I also agree that
Kevin's wording can be read as negative and not particularly
constructive. But I also would like to call out that Zbyszek's use of
language is outright unacceptable.

No matter how I read it: it is an attack on the person, rather than a
constructive argument. ("your assumption", "you manage", "you are
under a false impression"). While I do understand the stress caused by
these neverending discussions and arguments, I expect better from a
member of FESCo, especially around "hot topics" like this.

Hunor
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Degradated modules support

[Chris Kelley]

>
> The above is done by about 2.5 people (counting multiple volunteers as 1
> person). This goes up at times and goes down but for the last year has been
> about that.

An aside - how/where does one volunteer to help releng?

On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 at 21:22, Stephen Smoogen  wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 at 10:12, Petr Pisar  wrote:
>
>> For module maintainers, module users, and flatpak maintainers:
>>
>> Fedora infrustructure has long-standing problems with supporting modules.
>>
>> Namely, MBS is unable to build modules with deep dependencies
>>  and Bodhi is unable to
>> accept
>> multicontext modules .
>>
>> This results into inability to support affected modules. E.g. it's
>> impossible
>> to build perl-CGI:5.54 for Fedora 39, and it's impossible to update
>> perl-Date-Manip:6.86 in stable Fedoras.
>>
>> Because nobody has tried to tackle these infrastructure deficiencies,
>> module
>> maintainers have hard times to support the modules, and as a result users
>> can
>
> expect dropping of numerous modules from Fedora. If there remain no
>> modules,
>> Fedora project might consider removing Modularity from Fedora
>> infrastructure.
>>
>>
> Most of the work needed to get these worked on successfully requires:
> 1. Nothing being higher priority for Fedora Infra, Fedora Releng, Red Hat
> MBS team, and other parts of the build system that this ties into.
> 2. Schedules being aligned between the 3-4 teams that this is a priority
> to work on for a 4 to 6 week period.
>
> Most of the Fedora Infrastructure and Releng work is tied up in:
> 1. getting a daily compose out the door (Monday through Sunday).
> 2. getting a release out in some form (beta/final) every 12 weeks.
> 3. keeping 40+ services over a couple hundred systems working to meet
> 1&&2.
>
> The above is done by about 2.5 people (counting multiple volunteers as 1
> person). This goes up at times and goes down but for the last year has been
> about that.
>
> I don't think this is unique to Fedora Infra/Releng. The teams which have
> supported MBS, Koji, PDC, ODCS, etc have their own goals they need to
> accomplish and it is hard to get their time to sync up with the usual short
> periods that Fedora Infra can 'slow-down' (usually after a release).
>
> I don't have any easy solutions on how to fix this. Even 'turn off
> modularity' isn't probably easy. Too many services are tied into the Fedora
> build system framework in a way that expects something from other parts
> even if they don't seem connected. You turn off one service, and you find
> out that 3 other things don't work weeks later because they expected some
> sort of 'heart-beat' or some other message.
>
>
>
>> That could also affect seemingly unrelated parts of Fedora like Flatpaks
>> whose build process is based on modularity.
>>
>> -- Petr
>> ___
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam, report it:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>>
>
>
> --
> Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
> Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
> -- Ian MacClaren
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2175955] biber-2.19 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175955

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||biber-2.19-1.fc39




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175955
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue