[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2023-03-19 Thread updates
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

rpki-client-8.3-1.el7

Details about builds:



 rpki-client-8.3-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7dcf3ac3b1)
 OpenBSD RPKI validator to support BGP Origin Validation

Update Information:

# rpki-client 8.3- The `expires` key in the JSON/CSV/OpenBGPD output formats
is now calculated with more accuracy. The calculation takes into account the
nextUpdate value of all intermediate CRLs in the signature path towards the
trust anchor, in addition to the expiry moment of the leaf-CRL and CAs.   -
Handling of CRLs and Manifests in the face of inconsistent RRDP delta
publications has been improved. A copy of an alternative version of the
applicable CRL is kept in the staging area of the cache directory, in order to
increase the potential for establishing a complete publication point, in cases
where a single publication point update was smeared across multiple RRDP delta
files.   - The OpenBGPD configuration output now includes validated Autonomous
System Provider Authorization (ASPA) payloads as an `aspa-set {}` configuration
block.   - When rpki-client is invoked with increased verbosity (`-v`), the
current RRDP Serial & Session ID are shown to aid debugging.   - Self-signed
X.509 certificates (such as Trust Anchor certificates) now are considered
invalid if they contain an X.509 `AuthorityInfoAccess` extension.   - Signed
Objects where the CMS signing-time attribute contains a timestamp later then the
X.509 certificate's `notAfter` timestamp are considered invalid.   - Manifests
where the CMS signing-time attribute contains a timestamp later then the
Manifest eContent `nextUpdate` timestamp are considered invalid.   - Any objects
whose CRL Distribution Points extension contains a CRLIssuer, CRL Reasons, or
`nameRelativeToCRLIssuer` field are considered invalid in accordance with RFC
6487 section 4.8.6.   - For every X.509 certificate the SHA-1 of the Subject
Public Key is calculated and compared to the Subject Key Identifier (SKI), if a
mismatch is found the certificate is not trusted.   - Require the outside-TBS
signature OID for every X.509 intermediate CA certificate and CRL to be
`sha256WithRSAEncryption`.   - Require the RSA key pair modulus and public
exponent parameters to strictly conform to the RFC 7935 profile.   - Ensure
there is no trailing garbage present in Signed Objects beyond the self-embedded
length field.   - Require RRDP Session IDs to strictly be version 4 UUIDs.   -
When decoding and validating an individual RPKI file using filemode (`rpki-
client -f file`), display the signature path towards the trust anchor, and the
timestamp when the signature path will expire.   - When decoding and validating
an individual RPKI file using filemode (`rpki-client -f file`), display the
optional CMS signing-time, and non-optional X.509 notBefore, and X.509 notAfter
timestamps.

ChangeLog:

* Sun Mar 19 2023 Robert Scheck  8.3-1
- Upgrade to 8.3 (#2179641)
* Fri Jan 20 2023 Fedora Release Engineering  - 8.2-4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2179641 - rpki-client-8.3 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179641


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 2177338] perl-Lexical-SealRequireHints-0.012 is available

2023-03-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177338

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Lexical-SealRequireHin |perl-Lexical-SealRequireHin
   |ts-0.012-1.fc39 |ts-0.012-1.fc39
   ||perl-Lexical-SealRequireHin
   ||ts-0.012-1.fc38



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-691d8382d1 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177338
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: JPEGXL SONAME Bump

2023-03-19 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sun, 2023-03-19 at 23:53 +, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-03-19 at 19:43 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin via
> rpmfusion-
> developers wrote:
> > On 3/19/23 12:56, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > BTW add me (sergiomb) as co-maintainer (admin) for built libjxl
> > > for
> > > EPEL 8
> > > 
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170821
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > Added you.
> 
> Thank you 
> 
> we also need update highway-0.12.2-1.el8 on el8 [1]  so please also
> add
> meas maintainer of highway https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/highway
> 
> I will check the impact of update highway on epel 8 , I'm proven
> packager but I feel more comfortable be added , at least I will
> receive
> Bugzilla reports too ...
> 
> Best regards, 
> 

using find_unblocked_orphans.py (
https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/find_unblocked_orphans.py
)


find_unblocked_orphans.py --max_deps 1 --skip-orphans --release epel8
highway
Got info for highway on epel8, todo: 0

0 packages depend on highway ... I'm going update it 


> [1] 
> Warning: HWY_SVE, HWY_SVE2, HWY_SVE_256, HWY_SVE2_128 and HWY_RVV CPU
> targets are disabled
> -- Could NOT find HWY: Found unsuitable version "0.12.2", but
> required
> is at least "0.15.0" (found /usr/lib64/libhwy.a)
> CMake Error at third_party/CMakeLists.txt:35 (message):
> Highway library (hwy) not found.  Install libhwy-dev or download it
> to
> third_party/highway from https://github.com/google/highway .  Highway
> is
> required to build JPEG XL.  You can run
> /builddir/build/BUILD/libjxl-0.7.0/deps.sh to download this
> dependency.
> 
> 
> 
> > ___
> > rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
> > rpmfusion-develop...@lists.rpmfusion.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to
> > rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
> 
> -- 
> Sérgio M. B.
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
> rpmfusion-develop...@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: JPEGXL SONAME Bump

2023-03-19 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sun, 2023-03-19 at 19:43 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On 3/19/23 12:56, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > BTW add me (sergiomb) as co-maintainer (admin) for built libjxl for
> > EPEL 8
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170821
> > 
> > 
> 
> Added you.

Thank you 

we also need update highway-0.12.2-1.el8 on el8 [1]  so please also add
meas maintainer of highway https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/highway

I will check the impact of update highway on epel 8 , I'm proven
packager but I feel more comfortable be added , at least I will receive
Bugzilla reports too ...

Best regards, 



[1] 
Warning: HWY_SVE, HWY_SVE2, HWY_SVE_256, HWY_SVE2_128 and HWY_RVV CPU
targets are disabled
-- Could NOT find HWY: Found unsuitable version "0.12.2", but required
is at least "0.15.0" (found /usr/lib64/libhwy.a)
CMake Error at third_party/CMakeLists.txt:35 (message):
Highway library (hwy) not found.  Install libhwy-dev or download it to
third_party/highway from https://github.com/google/highway .  Highway
is
required to build JPEG XL.  You can run
/builddir/build/BUILD/libjxl-0.7.0/deps.sh to download this dependency.



> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
> rpmfusion-develop...@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: JPEGXL SONAME Bump

2023-03-19 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 5:28 PM Sandro  wrote:
>
> On 19-03-2023 10:39, Leigh Scott wrote:
> >> RPMFusion side, the following packages are affected:
> >>
> >> libheif
> >> xine-lib
> >>
> > xine-lib and libheif are both fedora packages.
>
> Regarding libheif, the change from RPMFusion to Fedora is very recent.
> The query might have been carried out before that happened.
>
> I'll be happy to take care of rebuilding libheif after jpegxl has been
> bumped. Are you using a side-tag for the soname bump?
>

libheif doesn't link to libjxl at all, so it shouldn't be factored into this.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: JPEGXL SONAME Bump

2023-03-19 Thread Sandro

On 19-03-2023 10:39, Leigh Scott wrote:

RPMFusion side, the following packages are affected:

libheif
xine-lib


xine-lib and libheif are both fedora packages.


Regarding libheif, the change from RPMFusion to Fedora is very recent. 
The query might have been carried out before that happened.


I'll be happy to take care of rebuilding libheif after jpegxl has been 
bumped. Are you using a side-tag for the soname bump?


-- Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230319.n.0 changes

2023-03-19 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230318.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230319.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   71
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   1.10 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   13.18 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: Kinoite/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230319.n.0.iso
Image: KDE raw-xz aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/images/Fedora-KDE-Rawhide-20230319.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz
Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree ppc64le
Path: Kinoite/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-ppc64le-Rawhide-20230319.n.0.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  aom-3.6.0-1.fc39
Old package:  aom-3.5.0-3.fc38
Summary:  Royalty-free next-generation video format
RPMs: aom libaom libaom-devel
Size: 70.90 MiB
Size change:  10.91 MiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 18 2023 Robert-Andr?? Mauchin  - 3.6.0-1
  - Update to 3.6.0


Package:  atomix-44.0-1.fc39
Old package:  atomix-44~rc-1.fc39
Summary:  Puzzle game: Build molecules out of isolated atoms
RPMs: atomix
Size: 2.00 MiB
Size change:  426 B
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 18 2023 David King  - 44.0-1
  - Update to 44.0


Package:  bodhi-client-7.1.1-1.fc39
Old package:  bodhi-client-7.1.0-1.fc39
Summary:  Bodhi client
RPMs: bodhi-client
Size: 91.26 KiB
Size change:  58 B
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 18 2023 Mattia Verga  - 7.1.1-1
  - Update to 7.1.1


Package:  bodhi-messages-7.1.1-1.fc39
Old package:  bodhi-messages-7.1.0-1.fc39
Summary:  JSON schema for messages sent by Bodhi
RPMs: python3-bodhi-messages
Size: 47.73 KiB
Size change:  26 B
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 18 2023 Mattia Verga  - 7.1.1-1
  - Update to 7.1.1


Package:  bodhi-server-7.1.1-1.fc39
Old package:  bodhi-server-7.1.0-2.fc39
Summary:  Bodhi server
RPMs: bodhi-composer bodhi-server
Size: 4.63 MiB
Size change:  1.07 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 18 2023 Mattia Verga  - 7.1.1-1
  - Update to 7.1.1


Package:  buku-4.8-1.fc39
Old package:  buku-4.7-4.fc38
Summary:  Powerful command-line bookmark manager
RPMs: buku
Size: 257.98 KiB
Size change:  1.05 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 18 2023 Robert-Andr?? Mauchin  - 4.8-1
  - Update to 4.8


Package:  ddgr-2.1-3.fc39
Old package:  ddgr-2.1-2.fc38
Summary:  DuckDuckGo from the terminal
RPMs: ddgr
Size: 48.00 KiB
Size change:  48 B
Changelog:
  * Wed Mar 15 2023 Zephyrus Lykos  - 2.1-3
  - Move fish completion file to vendor_completions.d


Package:  dmapd-0.0.93-1.fc39
Old package:  dmapd-0.0.92-2.fc39
Summary:  A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares
RPMs: dmapd dmapd-devel
Size: 643.49 KiB
Size change:  1.89 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 18 2023 W. Michael Petullo  - 0.0.93-1
  - Update to 0.0.93, and drop recently-added C99 patch (#2179313)


Package:  evince-44.0-1.fc39
Old package:  evince-44~rc-2.fc39
Summary:  Document viewer
RPMs: evince evince-devel evince-djvu evince-dvi evince-libs 
evince-previewer evince-thumbnailer
Size: 12.93 MiB
Size change:  20.96 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 18 2023 David King  - 44.0-1
  - Update to 44.0


Package:  fcitx5-5.0.23-1.fc39
Old package:  fcitx5-5.0.22-1.fc39
Summary:  Next generation of fcitx
RPMs: fcitx5 fcitx5-autostart fcitx5-data fcitx5-devel
Size: 15.90 MiB
Size change:  767 B
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 18 2023 Qiyu Yan  - 5.0.23-1
  - update to upstream release 5.0.23


Package:  fcitx5-gtk-5.0.23-1.fc39
Old package:  fcitx5-gtk-5.0.22-1.fc39
Summary:  Gtk im module and glib based dbus client library
RPMs: fcitx5-gtk fcitx5-gtk-devel fcitx5-gtk2 fcitx5-gtk3 fcitx5-gtk4
Size: 780.10 KiB
Size change:  2.58 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 18 2023 Qiyu Yan  - 5.0.23-1
  - update to upstream release 5.0.23


Package:  glib-networking-2.76.0-2.fc39
Old package:  glib-networking-2.76~beta-1.fc39
Summary:  Networking support for GLib
RPMs: glib-networking glib-networking-tests
Size: 1.61 MiB
Size change:  -1.16 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 18 2023 David King  - 2.76.0-1
  - Update to 2.76.0

  * Sat Mar 18 2023 David King  - 2.76.0-2
  - Update to 2.76.0


Package:  gnome-autoar-0.4.4-1.fc39
Old package:  gnome-autoar-0.4.3-3.fc38
Summary:  Archive library
RPMs: gnome-autoar gnome-autoar-devel
Size: 557.65 KiB
Size change:  -350 B
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 18 2023 David King  - 0.4.4-1
  - Update to 0.4.4


Package:  gnome-boxes-44.0-1.fc39
Old package:  gnome-boxes-44~rc-2.fc39
Summary:  A simple GNOME 3 application to access remote or virtual systems
RPMs: gnome-boxes

Re: JPEGXL SONAME Bump

2023-03-19 Thread Robert-André Mauchin

On 3/19/23 12:56, Sérgio Basto wrote:

BTW add me (sergiomb) as co-maintainer (admin) for built libjxl for
EPEL 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170821




Added you.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Firecracker microVM manager

2023-03-19 Thread Igor Raits
On Sat, Mar 18, 2023, 03:37 Smith, Stewart via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> On Mar 5, 2023, at 10:19 AM, Kevin Kofler via devel <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > David Michael wrote:
> >> - Firecracker can be built with Fedora's libc (glibc), but it is
> >> officially unsupported upstream[3].  Functionality would be harmed by
> >> not using musl, e.g. seccomp filters are not used.
> >
> > Upstream's refusal to write seccomp filters that work with glibc should
> be a
> > red flag. It is definitely possible to sandbox glibc applications with
> > seccomp, e.g., Chromium does it. It does need updates/fixes to the
> seccomp
> > rules with almost every new version of glibc, but it is possible.
>
> I’m happy to engage with the Firecracker team and get everyone together to
> talk through the issues.
>
> We did used to package Firecracker for Amazon Linux (in an AL2 Extra), but
> it had literally zero users from our repos (lambda and others build their
> own). This could be due to just Firecracker by itself isn’t too useful
> without some other easy integration with something like containerd. That
> being said, I’d be interested in what use cases people have for it packaged
> in fedora.
>

We are using it internally at our company to spawn multiple VMs that
emulate our platform and due to the memory footprint libvirt has and lot of
unnecessary features, we use firecracker. And would prefer to have it
already packaged so that we won't be doing that ourselves.

That said, integration with some other tools (e.g. OpenStack or even some
custom scheduler to implement things like simple Lambda) would be great.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 2157115] perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-1.11 is available

2023-03-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157115



--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-1.11-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9859


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157115
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 2157115] perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-1.11 is available

2023-03-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157115

Upstream Release Monitoring  
changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-1.10 |perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-1.11
   |is available|is available



--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Releases retrieved: 1.11
Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.11
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.09-4.fc38
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Excel-Writer-XLSX/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2860/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157115
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 2157115] perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-1.11 is available

2023-03-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157115



--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1951820
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1951820=edit
Update to 1.11 (#2157115)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157115
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Status of AVIF support in Fedora

2023-03-19 Thread Sandro

On 18-03-2023 22:39, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:

On Saturday, 18 March 2023 at 08:40, Leigh Scott wrote:

I have orphaned libheif at rpmfusion as I have no desire to manage
another split package.

https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/libheif/


Thanks for the link. Picked up.


I'd like to give a big Thank You! to everyone involved. Neil, thanks for 
packaging. Dominik, thanks for reviewing and picking up the RPMFusion 
package. Leigh, thanks for having maintained libheif all this time.


Kalev, thanks for following along and updating gThumb, promptly[1]. 
That's where it all started and the circle is now complete.


Dominik, since you picked up the RPMFusion package, which conflicts with 
the new Fedora package, could you bring me up to speed what needs (is 
planned to) happen with the RPMFusion package?


[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165606

-- Sandro

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Fedora 38 compose report: 20230319.n.0 changes

2023-03-19 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-38-20230318.n.0
NEW: Fedora-38-20230319.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  1
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   5
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   1017.22 MiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   146.83 KiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: Kinoite/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-x86_64-38-20230318.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  gnome-boxes-44~rc-2.fc38
Old package:  gnome-boxes-44~rc-1.fc38
Summary:  A simple GNOME 3 application to access remote or virtual systems
RPMs: gnome-boxes
Size: 4.65 MiB
Size change:  714 B
Changelog:
  * Thu Mar 16 2023 Adam Williamson  - 44~rc-2
  - Backport MR #587 to fix spice agent (#2178004)


Package:  gnome-shell-44~rc-2.fc38
Old package:  gnome-shell-44~rc-1.fc38
Summary:  Window management and application launching for GNOME
RPMs: gnome-shell
Size: 6.88 MiB
Size change:  -607 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Mar 14 2023 Dominik Mierzejewski  - 44~rc-2
  - Recommend gnome-bluetooth instead of requiring it
Resolves rhbz#2172653


Package:  kernel-6.2.7-300.fc38
Old package:  kernel-6.2.6-300.fc38
Summary:  The Linux kernel
RPMs: kernel kernel-core kernel-debug kernel-debug-core 
kernel-debug-devel kernel-debug-devel-matched kernel-debug-modules 
kernel-debug-modules-core kernel-debug-modules-extra 
kernel-debug-modules-internal kernel-debug-uki-virt kernel-devel 
kernel-devel-matched kernel-doc kernel-modules kernel-modules-core 
kernel-modules-extra kernel-modules-internal kernel-uki-virt
Size: 844.51 MiB
Size change:  184.35 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Mar 17 2023 Justin M. Forbes  [6.2.7-0]
  - NFS: Correct timing for assigning access cache timestamp (Chengen Du)
  - usb: ucsi: Fix ucsi->connector race (Hans de Goede)
  - usb: ucsi_acpi: Increase the command completion timeout (Hans de Goede)
  - usb: ucsi: Fix NULL pointer deref in ucsi_connector_change() (Hans de Goede)
  - Enable CONFIG_NET_SCH_FQ_PIE for Fedora (Justin M. Forbes)
  - Fix build issue with efiuki conditional (Justin M. Forbes)
  - Move endif to correct location for efiuki conditional (Justin M. Forbes)
  - EFI UKI revert now conditionalized in spec. Drop revert (Justin M. Forbes)
  - Linux v6.2.7


Package:  mutter-44~rc-5.fc38
Old package:  mutter-44~rc-4.fc38
Summary:  Window and compositing manager based on Clutter
RPMs: mutter mutter-devel mutter-tests
Size: 15.75 MiB
Size change:  2.18 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Mar 16 2023 Adam Williamson  - 44~rc-5
  - Backport MR #2901 to fix crash when reverting Display settings
  - Backport MR #2912 to fix crash when using win+P shortcut


Package:  qt6-qtwebengine-6.4.2-4.fc38
Old package:  qt6-qtwebengine-6.4.2-3.fc38
Summary:  Qt6 - QtWebEngine components
RPMs: qt6-qtwebengine qt6-qtwebengine-devel qt6-qtwebengine-devtools 
qt6-qtwebengine-examples
Size: 145.42 MiB
Size change:  -39.80 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Mar 12 2023 Neal Gompa  - 6.4.2-4
  - Rebuild for ffmpeg 6.0



= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: JPEGXL SONAME Bump

2023-03-19 Thread Sérgio Basto
BTW add me (sergiomb) as co-maintainer (admin) for built libjxl for
EPEL 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170821


On Sun, 2023-03-19 at 10:18 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> I am planning a soname bump of jpegxl to 0.8.1 next week Saturday the
> 25th.
> 
> Some of you will be affected by these changes.
> 
> Fedora side we have:
> 
> geeqie
> gthumb
> seamonkey
> vips
> 
> I can take care of these one as a PP  in a side tag
> 
> RPMFusion side, the following packages are affected:
> 
> libheif
> xine-lib
> 
> I would like to have RPMFusion maintainers help to be able to update
> them in a RPMFusion 
> side tag too. I will specify to you when the Fedora side tag has been
> merged.
> 
> Hopefully, with your cooperation, everything will go smoothly.
> 
> Please send any question you may have regarding this change.
> 
> Thanks to everyone!
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Robert-André (eclipseo)
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
> rpmfusion-develop...@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: JPEGXL SONAME Bump

2023-03-19 Thread Leigh Scott
> xine-lib and libheif are both fedora packages.


https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/YMOLJESUIIFK5RZYPGWTE362CKZH7JXV/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: JPEGXL SONAME Bump

2023-03-19 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 19/03/23 10:18, Robert-André Mauchin ha scritto:

> Hello everyone,
>
> I am planning a soname bump of jpegxl to 0.8.1 next week Saturday the 25th.
>
> Some of you will be affected by these changes.
>
> Fedora side we have:
>
> geeqie
> gthumb
> seamonkey
> vips
>
> I can take care of these one as a PP  in a side tag
>
> RPMFusion side, the following packages are affected:
>
> libheif
> xine-lib
>
> I would like to have RPMFusion maintainers help to be able to update them in 
> a RPMFusion
> side tag too. I will specify to you when the Fedora side tag has been merged.
>
> Hopefully, with your cooperation, everything will go smoothly.
>
> Please send any question you may have regarding this change.
>
> Thanks to everyone!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Robert-André (eclipseo)

The list of affected packages seems incomplete:

$ fedrq whatrequires-src jpegxl -F source -b rawhide
ImageMagick
SDL2_image
aom
darktable
ffmpeg
geeqie
gimp
gthumb
jpegxl
kf5-kimageformats
seamonkey
vips
xine-lib

Mattia___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: JPEGXL SONAME Bump

2023-03-19 Thread Leigh Scott
> Hello everyone,
> 
> I am planning a soname bump of jpegxl to 0.8.1 next week Saturday the 25th.
> 
> Some of you will be affected by these changes.

> RPMFusion side, the following packages are affected:
> 
> libheif
> xine-lib
> 

xine-lib and libheif are both fedora packages.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


JPEGXL SONAME Bump

2023-03-19 Thread Robert-André Mauchin

Hello everyone,

I am planning a soname bump of jpegxl to 0.8.1 next week Saturday the 25th.

Some of you will be affected by these changes.

Fedora side we have:

geeqie
gthumb
seamonkey
vips

I can take care of these one as a PP  in a side tag

RPMFusion side, the following packages are affected:

libheif
xine-lib

I would like to have RPMFusion maintainers help to be able to update them in a RPMFusion 
side tag too. I will specify to you when the Fedora side tag has been merged.


Hopefully, with your cooperation, everything will go smoothly.

Please send any question you may have regarding this change.

Thanks to everyone!

Best regards,

Robert-André (eclipseo)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Rawhide-20230318.n.0 & Razer Blade 14 2021 laptop - odd crashes

2023-03-19 Thread Adam Baxter
I have no idea why this didn't end up as a reply on the original thread.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Rawhide-20230318.n.0 & Razer Blade 14 2021 laptop - odd crashes

2023-03-19 Thread Adam Baxter
Apologies if this isn't quite the right place to post this.

I've just tried a recent Rawhide on my laptop, 
Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20230318.n.0.iso, via a live USB.

Booting seems to work, except any external display plugged in either via HDMI 
or USB is flickering/bright white. Wifi and Bluetooth work.
Plugging in any additional monitor causes the machine to reboot (if it's 
possible to stop the instant reboot, I'm happy to capture whatever logs are 
needed)

Booting into safe graphics mode works, but I'm limited to 800x600 and no 
external monitors.

I can't see any way to attach dmesg / dmidecode / lspci via the web interface 
here, I will see if I can reply via email maybe.


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue