[Bug 2177873] Please provide perl-Net-Amazon-S3 for EPEL9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177873 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-dfaf3ea28f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-dfaf3ea28f See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177873 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187550] perl-XML-Generator-1.11 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187550 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-ba51990cc5 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-ba51990cc5` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ba51990cc5 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187550 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Test upgrades from F37 to F38 - it will take you just a minute
Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package ffmpeg-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 - package ffmpeg-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 conflicts with ffmpeg-free provided by ffmpeg-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64 - ffmpeg-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - conflicting requests Problem 2: problem with installed package firefox-112.0-3.fc37.x86_64 - conflicting requests - package ffmpeg-libs-6.0-6.fc38.i686 conflicts with libavcodec-free provided by libavcodec-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64 - package ffmpeg-libs-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 conflicts with libavcodec-free provided by libavcodec-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64 - problem with installed package libavcodec-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 - libavcodec-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - firefox-112.0-3.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 5:49 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 06:30:36PM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > > > - problem with installed package > msv-xsdlib-1:2013.6.1-19.fc33.noarch > > > > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) > > > > > > I'll add this one to fedora-obsolete-packages. > > > > > > > > It looks like you've only added the main package msv [0]. However, that > > package doesn't exist as a binary rpm, the srpm only produces msv-* > > subpackages [1]. And obsoleting the main package won't obsolete the > > subpackages, so this conflict is not fixed yet. I'm not sure if any of > the > > other msv-* subpackages should also be obsoleted or just msv-xsdlib. > > I adjusted f-o-p to just list them all. I don't think we want to keep some > subset of the subpackages. > > Zbyszek > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- *Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it* ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Test-Announce] Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230418.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230418.n.1. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/testcase_stats/39 You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Rawhide_20230418.n.1_Summary The individual test result pages are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Rawhide_20230418.n.1_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Rawhide_20230418.n.1_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Rawhide_20230418.n.1_Server https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Rawhide_20230418.n.1_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Rawhide_20230418.n.1_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Rawhide_20230418.n.1_Security_Lab Thank you for testing! -- Mail generated by relvalconsumer: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relvalconsumer ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Prioritized bugs and issues
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 6:00 AM wrote: > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >Prioritized bugs and issues on 2023-04-19 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 > America/Indiana/Indianapolis >At fedora-meetin...@irc.libera.chat > > More information available at: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/program_management/prioritized_bugs/ > Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10144/ We will discuss the following nominated bugs: * English keyboard layout is erroneously used during initramfs phase (e.g. decrypting encrypted storage devices) instead of native layout, on Silverblue / ostree installs - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890085 * Cannot copy/paste to/from KDE VMs - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016563 * Windows with bitlocker enabled can't be booted, needs to use bootnext instead of chainloader - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049849 * Live image made with BOOTX64.EFI from latest shim-x64-15.6-2 fails to boot on some boards - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2113005 In addition, we'll check in on the following accepted bugs: * It is possible to go through the initial setup without creating a root and without adding a user to the wheel group - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2015490 -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Recommended way to disable parallel build
On 18. 04. 23 11:24, Florian Weimer wrote: What's the best way to disable to disable parallel (make) builds? This? %undefine _smp_build_ncpus It seems it will set RPM_BUILD_NCPUS to the empty string, though. Set it to 1. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: soname bump: libtraceevent and libtracefs
Hi all, Just a heads-up, I've built the following packages for Rawhide in the side tag f39-build-side-65890. And I plan to merge the side tag on Sunday. Feel free to let me know if there are concerns or objections. libtracefs-1.6.4-1 trace-cmd-3.1.6-1 libtracecmd-1.3.1-1 kernelshark-2.2.0-1 By the way, corresponding work on Fedora 38 haven't started yet. On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 6:24 AM John Kacur wrote: > > That's great Justin, thanks. > > John > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 5:01 PM Justin Forbes wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 2:45 PM John Kacur wrote: >> > >> > There is a new tool that is dependent on these libs too. Also from Daniel >> > Bristot (rtla) >> > tools/verification/rv >> > >> > I was wondering if we could get this into rawhide? >> >> Yes, I will get it in before the 6.3 release next Monday, that way it >> will automatically follow into stable Fedora as they get the 6.3 >> rebase. >> >> Justin >> >> > John Kacur >> > >> > On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 12:12 AM Zamir SUN wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On 4/5/23 23:49, Justin Forbes wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 5:05 AM Zamir SUN wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm working on libtraceevent and libtracefs update. There will be >> >> >> soname >> >> >> bump happening to them. Namely, >> >> >> >> >> >> libtraceevent.so 1.6.3 -> 1.7.2 >> >> >> libtracefs.so 1.5.0 -> 1.6.4 >> >> >> >> >> >> IIRC only kernel-tools (for perf and rtla) and trace-cmd depends on >> >> >> them. So I'm also copying their corresponding contacts. >> >> >> >> >> >> As for libtraceevent, I've tried running trace-cmd/perf/rtla with the >> >> >> new version and they still works. So I've updated it in Rawhide, Fedora >> >> >> 38 and Fedora 37. They are now in Bodhi. >> >> >> >> >> >> As for libtracefs I've built it in side tag f39-build-side-65890. I >> >> >> plan >> >> >> to update it in both Rawhide and Fedora 38 this week. >> >> > >> >> > Given that we are in a freeze for F38, it might be better to wait >> >> > until GA, but I have rebuilt kernel-tools in the sidetag. Please let >> >> > me know when this is merged back as we rebuild kernel-tools weekly in >> >> > rawhide. >> >> > >> >> >> >> Hi Justin, >> >> >> >> I think this is a good point. I will coordinate with you when I do it >> >> for Fedora 38. >> >> -- Ziqian SUN (Zamir) z...@fedoraproject.org GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E Want to know more about Fedora? Visit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2023-04-19 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #topic aloha #topic EPEL Issues https://pagure.io/epel/issues * https://pagure.io/epel/issues?tags=meeting=Open #topic Old Business (if needed) #topic General Issues / Open Floor Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9854/ ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Recommended way to disable parallel build
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 01:50:32PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 4/18/23 12:24, Florian Weimer wrote: > >What's the best way to disable to disable parallel (make) builds? > > > >This? > > > >%undefine _smp_build_ncpus > > > >It seems it will set RPM_BUILD_NCPUS to the empty string, though. > > No, don't do that. It depends on where you want to do it. From a > spec (typically for a package with broken parallel build): > > %global _smp_ncpus_max 1 > > (a %define will do just as well), or "%_smp_ncpus_max 1" in a macros > file. Or set RPM_BUILD_NCPUS environment variable to 1. If the build uses make then it's necessary to add: unset MAKEFLAGS since if someone has that set in their environment it will affect local rpmbuild. Maybe RPM ought to filter that environment variable? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com nbdkit - Flexible, fast NBD server with plugins https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-IPC-Run] PR #1: Update license to SPDX format
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-IPC-Run` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Update license to SPDX format `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IPC-Run/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-IO-Socket-INET6] PR #2: Update license to SPDX format
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-IO-Socket-INET6` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Update license to SPDX format `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-INET6/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-IPC-Run] PR #1: Update license to SPDX format
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-IPC-Run` that you are following: `` Update license to SPDX format `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IPC-Run/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187674] perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.20 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187674 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1. |perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1. |19 is available |20 is available --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Releases retrieved: 1.20 Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.20 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.18-7.fc38 URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/Perl-Tidy-Sweetened/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/8235/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187674 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-File-pushd] PR #1: Update license to SPDX format
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-File-pushd` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Update license to SPDX format `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-File-pushd/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-File-chdir] PR #1: Update license to SPDX format
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-File-chdir` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Update license to SPDX format `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-File-chdir/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-IO-Socket-INET6] PR #2: Update license to SPDX format
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-IO-Socket-INET6` that you are following: `` Update license to SPDX format `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-INET6/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-File-pushd] PR #1: Update license to SPDX format
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-File-pushd` that you are following: `` Update license to SPDX format `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-File-pushd/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-File-chdir] PR #1: Update license to SPDX format
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-File-chdir` that you are following: `` Update license to SPDX format `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-File-chdir/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187674] New: perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187674 Bug ID: 2187674 Summary: perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.19 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 1.19 Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.19 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.18-7.fc38 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Perl-Tidy-Sweetened/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/8235/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187674 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2177873] Please provide perl-Net-Amazon-S3 for EPEL9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177873 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-dfaf3ea28f has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-dfaf3ea28f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177873 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2177873] Please provide perl-Net-Amazon-S3 for EPEL9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177873 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.991-4. ||el9 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177873 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2177873] Please provide perl-Net-Amazon-S3 for EPEL9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177873 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/52800 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177873 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Recommended way to disable parallel build
On 4/18/23 12:24, Florian Weimer wrote: What's the best way to disable to disable parallel (make) builds? This? %undefine _smp_build_ncpus It seems it will set RPM_BUILD_NCPUS to the empty string, though. No, don't do that. It depends on where you want to do it. From a spec (typically for a package with broken parallel build): %global _smp_ncpus_max 1 (a %define will do just as well), or "%_smp_ncpus_max 1" in a macros file. Or set RPM_BUILD_NCPUS environment variable to 1. - Panu - ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Recommended way to disable parallel build
Maybe %global numjobs 1 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Let's deprecate the %{pyproject_build_lib} macro... ?
On 08. 03. 23 12:09, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello.
The %{pyproject_build_lib} macro is a *provisional* macro from
pyproject-rpm-macros.
It was added to solve the problem of out-of-tree pip builds. From the
pyproject-rpm-macros README:
"""
Sometimes, it is desired to be able to import the just-built extension modules
in the %build section, e.g. to build the documentation with Sphinx.
%build
%pyproject_wheel
... build the docs here ...
With pure Python packages, it might be possible to set PYTHONPATH=${PWD} or
PYTHONPATH=${PWD}/src. However, it is a bit more complicated with extension
modules.
The location of just-built modules might differ depending on Python version,
architecture, pip version, etc. Hence, the macro %{pyproject_build_lib} exists
to be used like this:
%build
%pyproject_wheel
PYTHONPATH=%{pyproject_build_lib} ... build the docs here ...
"""
When this macro was introduced, the built extension module lived in a folder
like
/builddir/build/BUILD/%{name}-%{version}/.pyproject-builddir/pip-req-build-/build/lib.linux-x86_64-3.10, hence it made sense to include in the pyproject-rpm-macros and call it %pyproject_something.
Today, on Rawhide, pip default to in-tree-builds and the value for extension
modules will most likely be:
$PWD/build/lib.%{python3_platform}-cpython-%{python3_version_nodots}
And for pure Python:
$PWD/build/lib
And it turns out, the value is setuptools-specific, see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176393
Other build backends might store the built extension modules elsewhere or
simply pack the pure Python files into wheel directly from the source tree.
In Rawhide, 41 packages use PYTHONPATH="%{pyproject_build_lib}" and 2 packages
have a comment with %%{pyproject_build_lib} in them.
Considering the macro
- is not build-backend-agnostic, and
- is not so much needed as it once was
I propose we deprecate it with no further fixes going in, but no scheduled
removal.
The 41 packages can be fixed once Fedora 36 goes EOL by expanding the macro to
the values above, or if desired, we could macronize this in pythohn3-setuptools
as %{setuptools_build_lib}.
One problem is that the macro is unfortunately still needed on EL 9.
Thoughts?
WIP pull request:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros/pull-request/375
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187275] perl-User-Identity-1.02 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||2187643 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187643 [Bug 2187643] Review Request: perl-Hash-Ordered - Perl class for ordered hashes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Recommended way to disable parallel build
What's the best way to disable to disable parallel (make) builds? This? %undefine _smp_build_ncpus It seems it will set RPM_BUILD_NCPUS to the empty string, though. Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187275] perl-User-Identity-1.02 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar --- I will try to package perl-Hash-Ordered. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?
On Monday, 17 April 2023 at 17:53, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > I want to thank you all for the feedback. > > Everything was already mentioned in the discussion so I am not going > to dig into details again. Just a quick summary for anyone who wants > TL;DR for this thread: > > - I am not going to implement the original proposal or any variation of it > - Instead, I am going to automatically open an issue in the > package-sponsors tracker for new contributors after they receive > fedora-review+ on their first ticket. A link to this issue along with > some explanation will be automatically commented to their package > review Bugzilla ticket. > - You can follow the progress here > https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service/issues/18 That sounds excellent to me. Thanks for doing this! Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187550] perl-XML-Generator-1.11 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187550 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-ba51990cc5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ba51990cc5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187550 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187550] perl-XML-Generator-1.11 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187550 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jples...@redhat.com,| |mspa...@redhat.com | Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Fixed In Version||perl-XML-Generator-1.11-1.f ||c39 Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187550 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187598] perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO-1.17 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187598 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO-1.17-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=100089479 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187598 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
