New look for Koji Web

2023-06-20 Thread Ryan Lerch 
The Koji web front end is now running a new theme that brings it into
line with the majority of our other devel focused web applications:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/

If there are any issues with the new theme, feel free to file an issue
against it here:

https://gitlab.com/fedora/websites-apps/themes/koji-theme-fedora

cheers,
ryanlerch
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Releasing package updates in multiple Fedora releases

2023-06-20 Thread Orion Poplawski 

On 6/18/23 04:28, Adam Williamson wrote:

On Sun, 2023-06-18 at 09:16 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:

For the 99% of packages I maintain I usually perform the same workflow
when updating them:

1. Update spec and source in Rawhide
2. commit and push
3. fedpkg build
4. fedpkg switch-branch f*
5. git merge rawhide
6. push and fedpkg build

And repeat 4-5-6 for every f*/epel* branches where I want to push the
update.

This is quite boring and time wasting... is there a more efficient way
to use my packaging time? Do you think fedpkg can be enhanced to have a
single command which makes 4-5-6 to all specified branches?


I have this in my command history:

for i in f37 f38 rawhide; do fedpkg switch-branch $i; git pull; git merge 
rawhide; fedpkg push; fedpkg build --nowait; done


Similar:

In my .bashrc:

fpbr() { for rel in $*; do fedpkg switch-branch $rel; git merge rawhide 
&& git push && fedpkg build --nowait; done; }


You're addition of git pull is a good thing.

--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his  - surely the least important thing about me
IT Systems Manager 720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane   or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2215815] perl-re-engine-RE2-0.18 is available

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215815

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-6eae45b5b9 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-6eae45b5b9`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-6eae45b5b9

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215815

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202215815%23c4
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2216352] New: perl-libwww-perl-6.71 is available

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216352

Bug ID: 2216352
   Summary: perl-libwww-perl-6.71 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-libwww-perl
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: mspa...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: ka...@ucw.cz, mspa...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
rhug...@redhat.com, rstr...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 6.71
Upstream release that is considered latest: 6.71
Current version/release in rawhide: 6.70-1.fc39
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/libwww-perl/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3024/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216352

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202216352%23c0
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2216294] New: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-1.17 is available

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216294

Bug ID: 2216294
   Summary: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-1.17 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: iarn...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 1.17
Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.17
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.16-2.fc39
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-Natural/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/7086/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-Natural


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216294

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202216294%23c0
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: releng-bot owns my package in SCM - belcard

2023-06-20 Thread Philip Wyett 
On Tue, 2023-06-20 at 09:40 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 05:04:19PM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
> > On Sun, 2023-06-18 at 17:35 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 12:01 PM Philip Wyett  
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > After completing a package-review for belcard[1], I tried to create the 
> > > > repo, seems that
> > > > the
> > > > repo
> > > > after a couple of attempts got created, but is owned by 'releng-bot' 
> > > > and not myself
> > > > 'kathenas'.
> > > > How
> > > > can I get this resolved?
> > > 
> > > Hi Phil,
> > > 
> > > I would file a releng ticket at https://pagure.io/releng/issues
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Kalev
> > 
> > Hi Kalev,
> > 
> > Thanks for the tip. Been done now.
> 
> Just FYI, this very occasionally happens when there's some issue right
> when it's trying to create the new repo. The releng-bot user ends up
> owning the project instead of the submitter. 
> 
> Filing a releng ticket is the correct thing to do here and this one is
> all fixed up. 
> 
> kevin
> 

Hi Kevin,

Yes, all fixed now. An unusual quirk that I now know about. :-)

Regards

Phil

-- 
*** Playing the game for the games own sake. ***


Associations:

* Debian Maintainer (DM)
* Fedora/EPEL Maintainer.
* Contributor member of the AlmaLinux foundation.

WWW: https://kathenas.org

Buy Me a Coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg

Twitter: @kathenasorg

Instagram: @kathenasorg

IRC: kathenas

GPG: 724AA9B52F024C8B


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: releng-bot owns my package in SCM - belcard

2023-06-20 Thread Kevin Fenzi 
On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 05:04:19PM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-06-18 at 17:35 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 12:01 PM Philip Wyett  
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > After completing a package-review for belcard[1], I tried to create the 
> > > repo, seems that the
> > > repo
> > > after a couple of attempts got created, but is owned by 'releng-bot' and 
> > > not myself 'kathenas'.
> > > How
> > > can I get this resolved?
> > 
> > Hi Phil,
> > 
> > I would file a releng ticket at https://pagure.io/releng/issues
> > 
> > -- 
> > Kalev
> 
> 
> Hi Kalev,
> 
> Thanks for the tip. Been done now.

Just FYI, this very occasionally happens when there's some issue right
when it's trying to create the new repo. The releng-bot user ends up
owning the project instead of the submitter. 

Filing a releng ticket is the correct thing to do here and this one is
all fixed up. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

2023-06-20 Thread tdawson 
Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
   EPEL Steering Committee on 2023-06-21 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
   At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat

The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.

A general agenda is the following:

#topic aloha

#topic EPEL Issues https://pagure.io/epel/issues
* https://pagure.io/epel/issues?tags=meeting=Open

#topic Old Business (if needed)

#topic General Issues / Open Floor




Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9854/

___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Modules without modularity

2023-06-20 Thread Mattia Verga via devel 
Il 20/06/23 17:31, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ha scritto:
>
> [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/postgresql/pull-request/59
>
> Zbyszek

Isn't the package name required to match the name of specfile?

Mattia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Modules without modularity

2023-06-20 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 06:32:45PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> I spent some time thinking how to approximate the nice features with current
> state of RPM, Koji, and DNF and come up with this approach
> .

Thank you for the detailed proposal that tries to explore all the
corner cases.  This looks like it should work. It'd be nice to update
"postgresql demodularization pr" [1] to this scheme to test it on a real
live package.

[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/postgresql/pull-request/59

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2215546] perl-Net-HTTP-6.23 is available

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215546

Michal Josef Spacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #1 from Michal Josef Spacek  ---
Changes:

6.23  2023-06-16 11:46:01Z
- Don't treat HTTP header names as case sensitive in test (GH#81) (Olaf
  Alders)

For Fedora 37, 38 and rawhide


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215546

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202215546%23c1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom] PR #1: 1.23 bump

2023-06-20 Thread Michal Josef Špaček 

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom` that 
you are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
1.23 bump
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom] PR #1: 1.23 bump

2023-06-20 Thread Michal Josef Špaček 

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom` 
that you are following:
``
1.23 bump
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2216016] perl-B-Keywords-1.26 is available

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216016

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
   Fixed In Version||perl-B-Keywords-1.26-2.fc39
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Last Closed||2023-06-20 13:16:39




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216016
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2216187] Upgrade perl-CPAN-Meta-Requirements to 2.143

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216187

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
   Fixed In Version||perl-CPAN-Meta-Requirements
   ||-2.143-1.fc39
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Last Closed||2023-06-20 12:48:05



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-d918c3f20e has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216187

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202216187%23c2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2216187] Upgrade perl-CPAN-Meta-Requirements to 2.143

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216187

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-d918c3f20e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-d918c3f20e


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216187

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202216187%23c1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-File-Inplace] PR #1: Rebuilding the Fedora package

2023-06-20 Thread Michal Josef Špaček 

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-File-Inplace` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
Rebuilding the Fedora package
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-File-Inplace/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-B-Keywords] PR #2: Add run-require perl-devel for tests

2023-06-20 Thread Jitka Plesnikova 

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-B-Keywords` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
Add run-require perl-devel for tests
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-B-Keywords/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2216187] New: Upgrade perl-CPAN-Meta-Requirements to 2.143

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216187

Bug ID: 2216187
   Summary: Upgrade perl-CPAN-Meta-Requirements to 2.143
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
   URL: https://metacpan.org/release/CPAN-Meta-Requirements
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-CPAN-Meta-Requirements
  Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: iarn...@gmail.com, p...@city-fan.org,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest Fedora delivers 2.142 version. Upstream released 2.143. When you have
free time, please upgrade it.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216187

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202216187%23c0
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-File-Inplace] PR #1: Rebuilding the Fedora package

2023-06-20 Thread Michal Josef Špaček 

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-File-Inplace` that 
you are following:
``
Rebuilding the Fedora package
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-File-Inplace/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230620.n.0 changes

2023-06-20 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report 
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230619.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230620.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images:  6
Added packages:  6
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages:   84
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  1.39 MiB
Size of dropped packages:4.89 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   2.26 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   3.27 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker s390x
Path: 
Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20230620.n.0.s390x.tar.xz

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree ppc64le
Path: Kinoite/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-ppc64le-Rawhide-20230619.n.0.iso
Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: Kinoite/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230619.n.0.iso
Image: Server_KVM qcow2 s390x
Path: Server/s390x/images/Fedora-Server-KVM-Rawhide-20230619.n.0.s390x.qcow2
Image: Sericea dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: Sericea/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Sericea-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230619.n.0.iso
Image: Phosh raw-xz aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/images/Fedora-Phosh-Rawhide-20230619.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz
Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: 
Silverblue/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230619.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: belcard-5.2.45-1.fc39
Summary: C++ library to manipulate vCard standard format files
RPMs:belcard belcard-data belcard-devel belcard-tools
Size:1.06 MiB

Package: golang-github-vmihailenco-msgpack-5-5.3.5-1.fc39
Summary: MessagePack encoding for Golang v5
RPMs:golang-github-vmihailenco-msgpack-5-devel
Size:48.41 KiB

Package: php-phpunit-php-code-coverage10-10.1.2-2.fc39
Summary: PHP code coverage information, version 10
RPMs:php-phpunit-php-code-coverage10
Size:242.26 KiB

Package: php-sebastian-exporter5-5.0.0-1.fc39
Summary: Export PHP variables for visualization, version 5
RPMs:php-sebastian-exporter5
Size:13.36 KiB

Package: php-sebastian-global-state6-6.0.0-1.fc39
Summary: Snapshotting of global state, version 6
RPMs:php-sebastian-global-state6
Size:14.56 KiB

Package: php-sebastian-object-enumerator5-5.0.0-2.fc39
Summary: Traverses array and object to enumerate all referenced objects, 
version 5
RPMs:php-sebastian-object-enumerator5
Size:10.75 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: ht-2.1.0-15.fc38
Summary: File editor/viewer/analyzer for executables
RPMs:ht
Size:2.70 MiB

Package: json11-1.0.0-10.fc38
Summary: A tiny JSON library for C++11
RPMs:json11 json11-devel
Size:251.52 KiB

Package: nodepool-3.13.1-5.fc38
Summary: Nodepool management for a distributed test infrastructure
RPMs:nodepool nodepool-builder nodepool-doc nodepool-launcher
Size:672.35 KiB

Package: sipwitch-1.9.15-19.fc38
Summary: A secure peer-to-peer VoIP server for the SIP protocol
RPMs:sipwitch sipwitch-cgi sipwitch-devel sipwitch-plugin-forward 
sipwitch-plugin-scripting sipwitch-plugin-subscriber sipwitch-plugin-zeroconf 
sipwitch-runtime
Size:1.28 MiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  ImageMagick-1:7.1.1.11-2.fc39
Old package:  ImageMagick-1:7.1.1.11-1.fc39
Summary:  An X application for displaying and manipulating images
RPMs: ImageMagick ImageMagick-c++ ImageMagick-c++-devel 
ImageMagick-devel ImageMagick-djvu ImageMagick-doc ImageMagick-heic 
ImageMagick-libs ImageMagick-perl
Size: 37.95 MiB
Size change:  -56.30 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Jun 18 2023 S??rgio Basto  - 1:7.1.1.11-2
  - Mass rebuild for jpegxl-0.8.1


Package:  SDL2_image-2.6.3-2.fc39
Old package:  SDL2_image-2.6.3-1.fc39
Summary:  Image loading library for SDL
RPMs: SDL2_image SDL2_image-devel
Size: 640.05 KiB
Size change:  1.37 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Jun 18 2023 S??rgio Basto  - 2.6.3-2
  - Mass rebuild for jpegxl-0.8.1


Package:  almanah-0.12.3-7.fc39
Old package:  almanah-0.12.3-6.fc38
Summary:  Application for keeping an encrypted diary
RPMs: almanah
Size: 1.06 MiB
Size change:  -16.09 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Jun 19 2023 Kalev Lember  - 0.12.3-7
  - Rebuilt for gcr soname bump


Package:  aom-3.6.0-2.fc39
Old package:  aom-3.6.0-1.fc39
Summary:  Royalty-free next-generation video format
RPMs: aom libaom libaom-devel
Size: 73.63 MiB
Size change:  2.72 MiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Jun 18 2023 S??rgio M. Basto  - 3.6.0-2
  - Mass rebuild for jpegxl-0.8.1


Package:  darktable-4.2.1-4.fc39
Old package:  darktable-4.2.1-1.fc39
Summary:  Utility to organize and develop raw images
RPMs: darktable darktable-tools-noise
Size: 21.46 MiB
Size change:  2.59 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Apr 15 2023 Germano Massullo  - 4.2.1-2
  - enables libheif-devel on EL>=9 and Fedora

  * Sun Apr 16 2023 Germano Massullo  - 4.2.1-3
  - improved Linux distribution version macros

  * Sun Jun 18 2023 S??rgio Basto  - 4.2.1-4
  - Mass rebuild for jpe

[rpms/perl-B-Keywords] PR #2: Add run-require perl-devel for tests

2023-06-20 Thread Jitka Plesnikova 

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-B-Keywords` that 
you are following:
``
Add run-require perl-devel for tests
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-B-Keywords/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-B-Keywords] PR #1: 1.26 bump; Package tests

2023-06-20 Thread Jitka Plesnikova 

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-B-Keywords` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
1.26 bump; Package tests
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-B-Keywords/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2214989] perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.084 is available

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214989



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-48ee77349e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-48ee77349e


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214989

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202214989%23c2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-B-Keywords] PR #1: 1.26 bump; Package tests

2023-06-20 Thread Jitka Plesnikova 

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-B-Keywords` that 
you are following:
``
1.26 bump; Package tests
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-B-Keywords/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2214989] perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.084 is available

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214989

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-bceb1cb5c8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-bceb1cb5c8


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214989

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202214989%23c1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Koji builders cannot build Wine Mono

2023-06-20 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 
On Tuesday, 20 June 2023 at 09:47, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hello, Michael.
> 
> On Tuesday, 20 June 2023 at 07:21, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I was attempting to push a Wine Mono update today but ran into a problem
> > with all versions of Fedora when building in Koji.
> > 
> > The Wine Mono update successfully compiles on my local system using "fedpkg
> > mockbuild" for all versions of Fedora.
> > 
> > The builds fail in similar ways but in different places. If anyone has a
> > minute could they review the build logs and offer a clue as to what may be
> > the cause?

[...]
> The latest version in rawhide is 6.12.0. Perhaps it's not capable of
> building the newer version and you need to bootstrap using prebuilt
> binaries.

I checked mono, not wine-mono, which is at 7.4.0. But perhaps this
matters, as well.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora   https://fedoraproject.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: SIG proposal: Multimedia SIG

2023-06-20 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 
On Tuesday, 20 June 2023 at 00:01, JT wrote:
> In the original post, I took private to mean its own dedicated list...
> not that it'd be hidden from view from everyone.  IMHO everything with
> Fedora should be in the open.  Bugs should be reported upstream, so I
> dont see why there would need to be any confidential information dealt
> with by the SIG.

If we set up the SIG bugzilla account as the default assignee, it'll get
sent bug reports filed by ABRT that are often marked as Confidential
because people submitting them don't uncheck the "mark as private"
checkbox for some reason. I get such bug reports regularly and I usually
ask the reporter to make them public. Some agree, others never reply.

Such reports cannot be made public without reporter's consent. So yes,
the plan is to have a non-public mailing list just for this purpose.
There's no intention of using it for any other purpose.

If the SIG members see a need for a dedicated mailing list, Matrix
chanel, forum or another communication venue, that can be set up later.
Right now, the idea is to share maintenance workload and coordinate
rebuilds.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora   https://fedoraproject.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2216016] perl-B-Keywords-1.26 is available

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216016

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
   |mspa...@redhat.com, |
   |p...@city-fan.org   |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216016
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Koji builders cannot build Wine Mono

2023-06-20 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 
Hello, Michael.

On Tuesday, 20 June 2023 at 07:21, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was attempting to push a Wine Mono update today but ran into a problem
> with all versions of Fedora when building in Koji.
> 
> The Wine Mono update successfully compiles on my local system using "fedpkg
> mockbuild" for all versions of Fedora.
> 
> The builds fail in similar ways but in different places. If anyone has a
> minute could they review the build logs and offer a clue as to what may be
> the cause?

I have no experience with Mono or .NET itself, but I do have experience
with fixing various build failures, so I've taken a look.

> F39 build attempts:
> - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102372408 (x86_64)

Segmentation fault in mono-sgen.

> - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102373027 (aarch64)

Segmentation fault in mono
(/builddir/build/BUILD/wine-mono-8.0.0/build/mono-unix/mono/mini/mono).

> - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102373207 (x86_64)

Segmentation fault in mono-sgen.

> F38 build attempt:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102372475 (aarch64)

I noticed these:
...
wine .//build/fixupclr.exe x86 
build/image-support/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v2.0.50727/installutil.exe
Application could not be started, or no application associated with the 
specified file.
ShellExecuteEx failed: File not found.

==> missing fixupclr.exe binary?
I think it should get built earlier:
...
CFLAGS="-g" CXXFLAGS="-g" LDFLAGS="" /usr/bin/make -C 
build/PresentationNative-x86 -f 
/builddir/build/BUILD/wine-mono-8.0.0/wpf/PresentationNative/Makefile ARCH=x86 
SRCDIR="/builddir/build/BUILD/wine-mono-8.0.0/wpf/PresentationNative" 
"MINGW=i686-w64-mingw32"
x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -municode -Wall tools/fixupclr/fixupclr.c -o 
build/fixupclr.exe -g

but then I can see this:

make: .//mono/config.guess: No such file or directory

and also:
...
0044:err:winediag:nodrv_CreateWindow Application tried to create a window, but 
no driver could be loaded.
0044:err:winediag:nodrv_CreateWindow L"Make sure that your X server is running 
and that $DISPLAY is set correctly."
0084:err:ntoskrnl:ServiceMain Failed to load 
L"C:\\windows\\system32\\win32k.sys"
0084:err:ntoskrnl:ServiceMain Failed to load 
L"C:\\windows\\system32\\drivers\\dxgkrnl.sys"
0084:err:ntoskrnl:ServiceMain Failed to load 
L"C:\\windows\\system32\\drivers\\dxgmms1.sys"
0098:err:winediag:nodrv_CreateWindow Application tried to create a window, but 
no driver could be loaded.
0098:err:winediag:nodrv_CreateWindow L"Make sure that your X server is running 
and that $DISPLAY is set correctly."
0098:err:setupapi:SetupDefaultQueueCallbackW copy error 1812 
L"@C:\\windows\\system32\\mscms.dll,-1" -> 
L"C:\\windows\\system32\\spool\\drivers\\color\\srgb color space profile.icm"
wine: failed to open L"C:\\windows\\syswow64\\rundll32.exe": c135

==> maybe you should run this under Xvfb? Also, are all required wine
subpackages installed?

> F37 build attempt:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102372473 (x86_64)

Segmentation fault in mono-sgen again.
Additionally, the build process tries (and fails) to download prebuilt
binaries from upstream:
...
cd lib && { (wget -O- 
https://download.mono-project.com/monolite/monolite-linux-1A5E0066-58DC-428A-B21C-0AD6CDAE2789-latest.tar.gz
 || curl -L 
https://download.mono-project.com/monolite/monolite-linux-1A5E0066-58DC-428A-B21C-0AD6CDAE2789-latest.tar.gz)
 | gzip -d | tar xf - ; }
make[8]: Leaving directory 
'/builddir/build/BUILD/wine-mono-8.0.0/mono/mcs/class'
/bin/sh: line 1: wget: command not found
  % Total% Received % Xferd  Average Speed   TimeTime Time  Current
 Dload  Upload   Total   SpentLeft  Speed

  0 00 00 0  0  0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 
0curl: (6) Could not resolve host: download.mono-project.com
gzip: stdin: unexpected end of file
tar: This does not look like a tar archive
tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
make[8]: *** [Makefile:560: get-monolite-latest] Error 2
make[7]: *** [build/profiles/build.make:123: do-get-monolite] Error 2
*** The runtime 'MONO_PATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/wine-mono-8.0.0/monolite 
/builddir/build/BUILD/wine-mono-8.0.0/build/mono-unix/mono/mini/mono-sgen' 
doesn't appear to be usable.
*** Check README for information on how to bootstrap a Mono installation.

Side notes: I see bundled boringssl, SDL2 and FAudio getting built.
The latest version in rawhide is 6.12.0. Perhaps it's not capable of
building the newer version and you need to bootstrap using prebuilt
binaries.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora   https://fedoraproject.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
___
devel mailing list --

Re: Decommissioning Nuancier

2023-06-20 Thread Ryan Lerch 
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 3:45 PM Benson Muite  wrote:
>
> On 6/20/23 06:44, Ryan Lerch wrote:
> > Plans are underway to decommission Nuancier[1]. Nuancier was custom
> > built for the single task of voting for Fedora supplementary
> > wallpapers, and has not been used for this task since Fedora 32.
> >
> Had offered to update this. Would it be ok for me to write something
> new?  Alternatively, Discourse does have some voting plugins. Could
> create another plugin if that would be helpful.  Note that Discourse is
> used by the Krita community to enable discussions on artwork
> https://krita-artists.org/ though storage requirements can increase
> somewhat.
>
> To give better vote privacy, one typically has three separate databases,
> ideally run completely separately. One database contains eligible voters
> does vote verification, and a third contains a tally. A simpler but well
> tested system is implemented in:
> https://github.com/benadida/helios-server
> Maybe this could also be helpful for Fedora elections?
>
> > As such, Fedora Infra is moving towards decommissioning this
> > application, and archiving all the data, images, and voting
> > statistics. Also, the source of this application[2] will be archived
> > in GitHub.
> >
> > For ongoing information and discussion on this process please view the
> > fedora-infrastructure ticket [3]

That may be a discussion for the design team itself -- since
supplemental wallpapers haven't really happened for the last few
releases (AFAIK due to disinterest in organizing the event). So not
sure how useful an entirely new tool will be.

Discourse voting could be interesting, but again, will need someone to
organize the actually submission and voting.

--ryanlerch


> >
> > 
> >
> > [1] - https://apps.fedoraproject.org/nuancier/
> > [2] -  https://github.com/fedora-infra/nuancier
> > [3] - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11371
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue