Re: Koji builders cannot build Wine Mono
On 6/25/23 3:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Do you have any idea what the bug might be here? All builders are now on 6.3.8-200.fc38. The "mono-sgen" process is crashing on kernel 6.2. Not every time either so it would take some time to debug. I have not narrowed it down further. Koji builders successfully built Wine Mono 8.0.0. Thank you for the quick update, Kevin. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F39 Change Proposal: LibuserDeprecation (System Wide)
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:33 PM Aoife Moloney wrote: > The main benefit is to decrease the maintenance and packaging work > on library that does not bring much value while the functionality is > provided by another components. On most (all?) Linux distributions, Puppet relies on libuser in order to manage group membership as an attribute of a group (1), because historically the shadow-utils package could not. There are folks who use Puppet to manage Fedora systems, and pulling the libuser package will break the ability of Puppet to manage group membership on Fedora. Background: libuser provides the ability to intuitively manage local group membership as an attribute of the group, instead of attributes of users. To add a user to a group: lgroupmod -M someuser somegroup To remove a user from a group: lgroupmod -m someuser somegroup For shadow-utils, adding can be achieved with: groupmod -a -U someuser somegroup But groupmod has no ability to remove a user from a group. Historically, before shadow-utils 4.10, the only way to remove a user from a group was to use: usermod -G groupset someuser …where groupset was the set of all supplementary groups for the user but with somegroup removed. This was racy and error-prone. For shadow-utils 4.10 or later, usermod has a new -r option, so it is possible to construct an equivalent: usermod -r -G somegroup someuser While this is a vast improvement, I would argue this option was added to the wrong utility: groupmod should have the ability to remove a user from a group, the same as lgroupmod. It’s also fairly new (RHEL9 still has shadow-utils 4.9, for example). I don’t disagree with the reasons for wanting to drop libuser; I just wish that… * the shadow-utils package could provide the equivalent functionality in a more intuitive way, and… * this change could be pushed to at least Fedora 40, to provide more time for downstream consumers of libuser to move away from it. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2214989] perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.084 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214989 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.084-1.fc38 |perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.084-1.fc38 ||perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.084-1.fc37 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-48ee77349e has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214989 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202214989%23c6 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Circular import issue in F37
On 07-06-2023 22:15, Sandro wrote:
On 07-06-2023 02:30, Sandro wrote:
On 06-06-2023 09:39, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 6:45 AM Sandro wrote:
Hi again,
I'm trying to understand why I'm getting a circular import error
running
tests only in F37 [1].
It's an easy fix adding an empty __init__.py in %prep, but why are F38
and rawhide buildroots happy not having that file, while F37
complaints?
Looking at the F37 log, you can see that only a few files were copied:
creating build/lib/palettable
copying palettable/utils.py -> build/lib/palettable
copying palettable/palette.py -> build/lib/palettable
copying palettable/__init__.py -> build/lib/palettable
with no trace of something named cmocean. And then looking at F38,
you see:
/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py:202:
SetuptoolsDeprecationWarning: Installing 'palettable.cmocean' as
data is deprecated, please list it in `packages`.
# Package would be ignored #
Python recognizes 'palettable.cmocean' as an importable package,
but it is not listed in the `packages` configuration of
setuptools.
'palettable.cmocean' has been automatically added to the
distribution only
because it may contain data files, but this behavior is likely
to change
in future versions of setuptools (and therefore is considered
deprecated).
Please make sure that 'palettable.cmocean' is included as a
package by using
the `packages` configuration field or the proper discovery
methods
(for example by using
`find_namespace_packages(...)`/`find_namespace:`
instead of `find_packages(...)`/`find:`).
You can read more about "package discovery" and "data files"
on setuptools
documentation page.
So you can see that the newer versions are happily working, but only
through some bit of compatibility concerns. It may eventually break
there as well.
I'm not quite sure I follow your explanation/analysis.
Yes, there is a deprecation warning, which should be addresses by
upstream. I'll let them know, possibly providing a patch.
I can also see that the build for F37 is incomplete. Indeed not all
modules have been added to the wheel.
What I fail to understand is how adding test/__init__.py fixes the
problem. I mean test is not even consulted during build. It resides
outside the palettable namespace.
diff --git a/python-palettable.spec b/python-palettable.spec
index 3334dc8..8d124db 100644
--- a/python-palettable.spec
+++ b/python-palettable.spec
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ BuildRequires: git-core
%prep
%autosetup -p1 -n %{pypi_name}-%{version} -S git
+touch test/__init__.py
%generate_buildrequires
%pyproject_buildrequires
This is the only change I made to the spec file. And all of a sudden
it works [2]? I didn't make any changes to pyproject.toml as suggested
in the deprecation warning.
A good night's sleep, a clear head and a rubber duck the size of en
elephant have finally opened my eyes.
Adding test/__init__.py only fixed the tests, not the package. The
resulting RPM is stripped of all submodules.
I changed the pyproject.toml file dropping the
tool.setuptools.packages.find table and adding:
[tool.setuptools]
packages = ["palettable"]
Now all submodules are included and tests succeed without needing to add
__init__.py. Locally, using `fedpkg --release f37 mockbuild -N`, that
is. Building from the resulting SRPM in Copr [3] or Koji [4] the
submodules are still missing.
I'm at a loss, once again, as to what exactly is going on here.
While I still don't understand the difference in behavior between F37
and F38/rawhide wrt to setuptools, it turned out I was one character
short in my original solution. I added:
include = ["palettable"]
to the tool.setuptools.packages.find table. That should have been:
include = ["palettable*"]
That `packages = ["palettable"]` excludes submodules by default, I find
disturbing.
Long story short: I learned something! But setuptools and I won't be
getting married anytime soon...
[3] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/gui1ty/neuro-sig/build/6017925/
[4] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101915616
-- Sandro
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
bc license correction
Hi, On bc package ( https://www.gnu.org/software/bc/ ), it was corrected the license tag from GPLv2+ (GPL-2.0-or-later) to GPL-3.0-or-later in rawhide Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: CentOS Stream, RHEL, and Fedora [was Re: What is Fedora?]
On 2023-06-25 14:29, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: The FOSS licenses give you the right to share the SRPMS, sans the Red Hat trademarks. The GPL, specifically, might guarantee that right, but not all of the distribution is under the terms of the GPL. I don't have a license count for RHEL components, but Fedora looks like it's made up of about 30% GPL components, with the majority being MIT, BSD, or Apache license, none of which prohibit Red Hat from imposing restrictions on their redistribution. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: CentOS Stream, RHEL, and Fedora [was Re: What is Fedora?]
On Sunday, 25 June 2023 at 02:44, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 6:09 PM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > >> > >> Josh Boyer wrote: > >> > Agree with Matthew fully here. We've been working rather hard > >> > internally to adjust the development process for RHEL to be more > >> > collaborative and open than it ever has before. > >> > >> The *development process* is more open, but the production > >> releases, which is the only thing end users are interested in, are > >> less open! > > > > Actually, this is not true either. Since December 2020, Red Hat > > Enterprise Linux has added a number of avenues in which you can > > freely get it: > > > > 1. Individuals (16 entitlements, prod use permitted): > > https://developers.redhat.com/articles/faqs-no-cost-red-hat-enterprise-linux > > > > 2. Teams (mucho entitlements for companies, no prod): > > https://developers.redhat.com/articles/2022/05/10/access-rhel-developer-teams-subscription > > > > 3. OSS projects running their own infra (mucho entitlements, prod > > use permitted): > > https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/extending-no-cost-red-hat-enterprise-linux-open-source-organizations > > That is not "open", it is just free as in beer, for a restricted > subset of people. If you are not (explicitly! Not just "try and hope > we do not terminate your subscription at our whim") entitled to share > the SRPMs, it is NOT open. The FOSS licenses give you the right to share the SRPMS, sans the Red Hat trademarks. Red Hat's terms of use for their subscriptions state explicitly (in several places), that: [...] This Agreement establishes the rights and obligations associated with Red Hat Products and is not intended to limit your rights to software code under the terms of an open source license. [...] So, unless you have some specific and verifiable examples, please stop spreading FUD. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Towards enabling rpm sysusers integration
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:25:10AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: >> Once upon a time, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek said: >> > I was hoping we would be make the dependency on setup optional. >> > It is a fairly heavyweight package (700+ kb) and with lots of >> > not-that-useful-on-a-typical-modern-installation stuff (mail alias support, >> > csh profile, /etc/hosts, nfs exports, etc.). Most of this is tiny, but it >> > clutters /etc, which ideally would be empty, and also /etc/services is 700 >> > kb. >> >> /etc/services and /etc/protocols are AFAIK mandatory if you want to have >> network services (either client or server). I don't think there's >> anything else providing that information. > > getservbyname would use /etc/services, but I'm not sure how widely it > is used. The getaddrinfo function uses it as well, to fill in the port number. Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Koji builders cannot build Wine Mono
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 01:33:31PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > We typically do update/reboot cycles every month or two, there's no hard > and fast schedule. If there's a reason we can do the builders sooner. > > I can see about rebooting them next week (or perhaps this weekend, but > not sure if I will have time to do so). > > Do you have any idea what the bug might be here? All builders are now on 6.3.8-200.fc38. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Unretire lua-ldap
Hello, According to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/ I'd like to announce that I'm going to unretire the package "lua-ldap". I didn't find a concrete reason why it was removed, it looks like it was retired because it was orphaned for too long. Specifically, I'd like to use it to re-enable LDAP support in the XMPP server "prosody" with its "mod_auth_ldap" plugin. I'm planning to update/maintain it also in EPEL. Upstream moved to here: https://github.com/lualdap/lualdap/commits/master and it looks like they are medium active, last commit this March 2023. Re-Review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217273 Best regards, Christian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2217268] New: perl-Graph-0.9727 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217268 Bug ID: 2217268 Summary: perl-Graph-0.9727 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Graph Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: athoscribe...@gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: a...@biosysanalytics.com, athoscribe...@gmail.com, igor.ra...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 0.9727 Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.9727 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.97.26-1.fc39 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Graph/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7524/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Graph -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217268 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202217268%23c0 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2217268] perl-Graph-0.9727 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217268 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build failed. Details below: BuilderException: Build failed: There is a syntax error in updated specfile. See attached diff for the changes. Traceback: File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/hotness/use_cases/package_scratch_build_use_case.py", line 56, in build result = self.builder.build(request.package, request.opts) ^ File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line 205, in build raise BuilderException(str(exc), value=output) If you think this issue is caused by some bug in the-new-hotness, please report it on the-new-hotness issue tracker: https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217268 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202217268%23c1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2217268] perl-Graph-0.9727 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217268 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1972511 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1972511=edit Update to 0.9727 (#2217268) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217268 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202217268%23c2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230625.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230624.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230625.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:10 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 43 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 27.65 KiB Size of dropped packages:13.35 KiB Size of upgraded packages: 240.16 MiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 608.54 KiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Everything boot ppc64le Path: Everything/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-ppc64le-Rawhide-20230625.n.0.iso Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker ppc64le Path: Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20230625.n.0.ppc64le.tar.xz Image: Cloud_Base qcow2 ppc64le Path: Cloud/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20230625.n.0.ppc64le.qcow2 Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Kinoite/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230625.n.0.iso Image: Server dvd ppc64le Path: Server/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Server-dvd-ppc64le-Rawhide-20230625.n.0.iso Image: Cloud_Base raw-xz ppc64le Path: Cloud/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20230625.n.0.ppc64le.raw.xz Image: Server_KVM qcow2 ppc64le Path: Server/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Server-KVM-Rawhide-20230625.n.0.ppc64le.qcow2 Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree ppc64le Path: Silverblue/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-ppc64le-Rawhide-20230625.n.0.iso Image: Container_Base docker ppc64le Path: Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20230625.n.0.ppc64le.tar.xz Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree aarch64 Path: Kinoite/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-aarch64-Rawhide-20230625.n.0.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Sericea dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Sericea/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Sericea-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230624.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: rust-expect-test-1.4.1-1.fc39 Summary: Minimalistic snapshot testing library RPMs:rust-expect-test+default-devel rust-expect-test-devel Size:27.65 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: golang-github-vmihailenco-tagparser-0.1.2-6.fc38 Summary: Opinionated Golang tag parser RPMs:golang-github-vmihailenco-tagparser-devel Size:13.35 KiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: PyDrive2-1.16.0-1.fc39 Old package: PyDrive2-1.15.4-1.fc39 Summary: Google Drive API Python wrapper library, maintained fork of PyDrive RPMs: python3-PyDrive2 Size: 127.75 KiB Size change: 557 B Changelog: * Sat Jun 24 2023 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga - 1.16.0-1 - Update to 1.16.0 - Closes rhbz#2217138 Package: apache-commons-text-1.10.0-1.fc39 Old package: apache-commons-text-1.9-5.fc39 Summary: Apache Commons Text is a library focused on algorithms working on strings RPMs: apache-commons-text apache-commons-text-javadoc Size: 605.19 KiB Size change: -120.69 KiB Changelog: * Sat Jun 24 2023 Didik Supriadi - 1.10.0-1 - Update to version 1.10.0 - Disable tests Package: bluez-5.66-6.fc39 Old package: bluez-5.66-5.fc38 Summary: Bluetooth utilities RPMs: bluez bluez-cups bluez-deprecated bluez-hid2hci bluez-libs bluez-libs-devel bluez-mesh bluez-obexd Size: 9.61 MiB Size change: 5.34 KiB Changelog: * Sun Jun 25 2023 Bastien Nocera - 5.66-6 - Add patch that fixes some devices not being discoverable in GNOME's Bluetooth Settings Package: distrobox-1.5.0.2-1.fc39 Old package: distrobox-1.5.0.1-1.fc39 Summary: Another tool for containerized command line environments on Linux RPMs: distrobox Size: 220.28 KiB Size change: 488 B Changelog: * Sat Jun 24 2023 Alessio - 1.5.0.2-1 - Update to 1.5.0.2 Package: gh-2.31.0-1.fc39 Old package: gh-2.30.0-2.fc39 Summary: GitHub's official command line tool RPMs: gh golang-github-cli-2-devel Size: 33.52 MiB Size change: 706.44 KiB Changelog: * Sat Jun 24 2023 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga - 2.31.0-1 - Update to 2.31.0 - Closes rhbz#2216708 Package: golang-github-lithammer-fuzzysearch-1.1.8-1.fc39 Old package: golang-github-lithammer-fuzzysearch-1.1.1-6.fc38 Summary: Tiny and fast fuzzy search in Go RPMs: golang-github-lithammer-fuzzysearch-devel Size: 17.16 KiB Size change: 947 B Changelog: * Sat Jun 24 2023 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga - 1.1.8-1 - Update to 1.1.8 - Closes rhbz#1963479 Package: golang-github-otiai10-mint-1.6.1-1.fc39 Old package: golang-github-otiai10-mint-1.5.1-1.fc39 Summary: Minimum assertion for Golang testing framework RPMs: golang-github-otiai10-mint-devel Size: 24.40 KiB Size change: 2.53 KiB Changelog: * Sat Jun 24 2023 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga - 1.6.1-1 - Update to 1.6.1 - Closes rhbz#2217159 Package: golang-github-quic-qtls-go1-20-0.2.2-1.fc39 Old package: golang-github-quic-qtls-go1-20-0.2.0-1.fc39 Summary: Go standard library TLS 1.3 implementation, modified for QUIC. RPMs: golang-github
Re: Something for a python maintainer for nihtest
On 25-06-2023 11:55, Sandro wrote: Hi, libzip have switch from old perl test suite to a new python based one using nihtest https://github.com/nih-at/nihtest https://pypi.org/project/nihtest/ As I don't want to dig in python packaging and as there is probably enough python guys here is there is one king enough to look at this one ? Sure. I'll take a look and submit a review. Would you be able to do the review? Then I ping you when it's ready. I packaged nihtest and submitted it for review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217257 -- Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2217164] perl-Mail-Message-3.013 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217164 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Mail-Message-3.013-1.f ||c39 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2023-06-25 10:45:06 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-d05f952ffe has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217164 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202217164%23c4 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2217164] perl-Mail-Message-3.013 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217164 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-d05f952ffe has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-d05f952ffe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217164 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202217164%23c3 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
pghmcfc pushed to rpms/perl-Mail-Message (rawhide). "Update to 3.013 (rhbz#2217164)"
Notification time stamped 2023-06-25 10:38:19 UTC
From 1e787cb1795df8df93629994cf3909d55080bb9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Jun 25 2023 10:37:42 +
Subject: Update to 3.013 (rhbz#2217164)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 96ec0b8..d81577b 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -9,3 +9,4 @@
/Mail-Message-3.010.tar.gz
/Mail-Message-3.011.tar.gz
/Mail-Message-3.012.tar.gz
+/Mail-Message-3.013.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Mail-Message.spec b/perl-Mail-Message.spec
index 53b1b6f..02c843e 100644
--- a/perl-Mail-Message.spec
+++ b/perl-Mail-Message.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Mail-Message
-Version: 3.012
-Release: 5%{?dist}
+Version: 3.013
+Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: MIME message handling
License: GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Mail-Message
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ BuildRequires:perl(Text::Autoformat)
BuildRequires: perl(Time::HiRes) >= 1.51
BuildRequires: perl(Time::Zone)
BuildRequires: perl(URI) >= 1.23
-BuildRequires: perl(User::Identity) >= 1.01
+BuildRequires: perl(User::Identity) >= 1.02
BuildRequires: perl(User::Identity::Collection::Emails)
BuildRequires: perl(utf8)
BuildRequires: perl(vars)
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ Requires: perl(Mail::Transport::Send)
Requires: perl(Net::Domain)
Requires: perl(Time::HiRes) >= 1.51
Requires: perl(Time::Zone)
-Requires: perl(User::Identity) >= 1.01
+Requires: perl(User::Identity) >= 1.02
# I'm not sure why these provides aren't getting picked up automatically.
Provides: perl(Mail::Message::Body::Construct) = %{version}
@@ -104,6 +104,8 @@ MIME message handling code, formerly part of the Mail::Box
package.
# https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=120149
rm -rf t/203-mlfolder.mbox t/204-sgfolder.mbox
rm -rf t/203head-listgroup.t t/204head-spamgroup.t
+perl -i -ne 'print $_ unless m{^t/20[34]-(ml|sg)folder\.mbox$}' MANIFEST
+perl -i -ne 'print $_ unless m{^t/20[34]head-(list|spam)group\.t$}' MANIFEST
%build
yes y |perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor NO_PACKLIST=1 NO_PERLLOCAL=1
@@ -122,6 +124,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/Mail::*.3*
%changelog
+* Sun Jun 25 2023 Paul Howarth - 3.013-1
+- Update to 3.013 (rhbz#2217164)
+
* Fri Jan 20 2023 Fedora Release Engineering -
3.012-5
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 3aa5981..3b911fa 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-SHA512 (Mail-Message-3.012.tar.gz) =
a29101f3e4ba30ca49e6e1fab39d3358df02ab95a99d6a9bd7e3d4e0d23e0cc3e8bf407adc7d21b83e52157d660014374157aeb44085e88ad2e4fb0b4553b8b4
+SHA512 (Mail-Message-3.013.tar.gz) =
7a15c42e1da549c69eecc20bba6a63a9558e11488d583de117225ae6a66c249ab6ab99108b051cbc476de02e08efbff5319b4ed0b268f7c3267f88bcfb9b2a1d
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mail-Message/c/1e787cb1795df8df93629994cf3909d55080bb9f?branch=rawhide
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Something for a python maintainer for nihtest
On 25-06-2023 09:04, Remi Collet wrote: Hi, libzip have switch from old perl test suite to a new python based one using nihtest https://github.com/nih-at/nihtest https://pypi.org/project/nihtest/ As I don't want to dig in python packaging and as there is probably enough python guys here is there is one king enough to look at this one ? Sure. I'll take a look and submit a review. Would you be able to do the review? Then I ping you when it's ready. libzip may be updated to 1.10.0 without this, but without its test suite, which seems a bad idea Thanks Remi P.S. of course I may try to help, after initial packaging to update to newer version when needed Thanks for the offer. Would you like to be co-maintainer once the package lands in Fedora? Cheers, -- Sandro FAS: gui1ty IRC: Penguinpee Elsewhere: [Pp]enguinpee ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2215128] perl-Mojolicious-9.33 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215128 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version||perl-Mojolicious-9.33-1.fc3 ||9 Status|NEW |CLOSED Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Last Closed||2023-06-25 08:07:00 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2219585 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215128 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202215128%23c1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Something for a python maintainer for nihtest
Hi, libzip have switch from old perl test suite to a new python based one using nihtest https://github.com/nih-at/nihtest https://pypi.org/project/nihtest/ As I don't want to dig in python packaging and as there is probably enough python guys here is there is one king enough to look at this one ? libzip may be updated to 1.10.0 without this, but without its test suite, which seems a bad idea Thanks Remi P.S. of course I may try to help, after initial packaging to update to newer version when needed ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
