date:20230810

Re: RPM packaging help

2023-08-10 Thread Maxwell G

Hi Robert-André and Andrew,

On Fri Aug 11, 2023 at 06:47 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On 8/10/23 15:43, Andrew Heath wrote:
> > All,
> > My name is Andrew, and I have been working with the Fedora Infra team and 
> > we are trying to 
> > create some RPMs for some projects that we are working on, one of the RPMs 
> > we need to create 
> > is for the Ansible receptor[1 ]. I 
> > have a copy of the 
> > spec file from downstream Red Hat that gives some guidance but where its a 
> > mix of python and 
> > go-lang I was wondering if I could have some guidance from more experienced 
> > packers on how 
> > to package up the application correctly so that we can get the package in 
> > use for the Fedora 
> > Infra.
> > 
> > Links:
> > [1]: https://github.com/ansible/receptor 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Sincerely,
> > Andrew Heath
> > aheath1...@gmail.com 
>
> Hello,
>
> Is the final package for RHEL or Fedora? There are different guidelines 
> regarding bundling I 
> believe.

I would follow the Go Packaging Guidelines and use unbundled deps if
possible. If there are too many unpackaged dependencies or you run into
broken packages or other issues, I'd go with vendoring. I and others at
Flock discussed using more vendoring for Go packages given the
unmaintainable large stack of Go library packages and the outdated
and/or broken state of many of them.

> The first issue I see is that there are two separate Python project in two 
> subdirectories. 
> Not sure how to handle that.
>
> Could you share the dowstream?

https://fedorapeople.org/~gotmax23/receptor-1.4.1-1.el9ap.src/

This specfile does not use the modern Pyproject Python macros nor the
modern Go macros. It doesn't have an SPDX license identifier either.

The way it does vendoring is a problem, as it provides no instructions
to regenerate the archive with `go mod vendor`.
I believe Yaakov Selkowitz wrote a good script for this (I remember
asking him to provide one when reviewing a "vendor dependencies for X"
PR for an ELN package), but I can't seem to find it :(.
The vendor archive should contain %{version} in its name so that it's
tied to the main archive.
The specfile should have `%license vendor/modules.txt` so that the
go_mod_vendor generator can create the appropriate `bundled()` Provides.
The License field needs to account for the licenses of the bundled
libraries.

Overall, this is a complicated project and perhaps not the best for
someone new to RPM packaging. I grimaced when I first saw Go and Python
mixed together in the repository. I would suggest starting with
something like ansible-builder and ansible-navigator or other more
straightforward parts of the AWX/AAP stack and move on to this.
That said, I'm happy to answer any potential questions as best as I can.

-- 
Best,

Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/They
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: RPM packaging help

2023-08-10 Thread Robert-André Mauchin


On 8/10/23 15:43, Andrew Heath wrote:

All,
My name is Andrew, and I have been working with the Fedora Infra team and we are trying to 
create some RPMs for some projects that we are working on, one of the RPMs we need to create 
is for the Ansible receptor[1 ]. I have a copy of the 
spec file from downstream Red Hat that gives some guidance but where its a mix of python and 
go-lang I was wondering if I could have some guidance from more experienced packers on how 
to package up the application correctly so that we can get the package in use for the Fedora 
Infra.


Links:
[1]: https://github.com/ansible/receptor 

--
Sincerely,
Andrew Heath
aheath1...@gmail.com 


Hello,

Is the final package for RHEL or Fedora? There are different guidelines regarding bundling I 
believe.


The first issue I see is that there are two separate Python project in two subdirectories. 
Not sure how to handle that.


Could you share the dowstream?

I will look at it tonight/this week-end.

Robert-André
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Test-Announce] DNF 5 Test Week starts today!

2023-08-10 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee

Hey Folks,

DNF 5 landed in rawhide sometime back and has now been taken off F39
schedule. DNF 5 awaits testing and feedback before it can be
considered stable for Fedora users. DNF and Fedora Quality are hosting
a week-long testing period from Friday, August 11th through Thursday,
August 17th.

The wiki[0] contains all information and the results can be submitted
by the test days app[1]


[0] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2023-08-11_Fedora_39_DNF_5
[1] https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/163

Happy Testing!

-- 
//sumantro
Fedora QE
TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2229823] perl-Test-Harness-3.46 is available

2023-08-10 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229823



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-0499640acc has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-0499640acc`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0499640acc

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229823

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202229823%23c6
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2230861] perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom-1.27 is available

2023-08-10 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2230861

Upstream Release Monitoring  
changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom-1.26  |perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom-1.27
   |is available|is available



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Releases retrieved: 1.27
Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.27
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.24-2.fc39
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Lingua-EN-Fathom/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/6661/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2230861

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202230861%23c1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Mock v5.0 released (and mock-core-configs v39)

2023-08-10 Thread Leslie Satenstein via devel

Will the current fixes allow test installations of the workspaces.iso? True 
Ivan test using the everything.iso, but we do want the installation programs to 
work fully
What is stopping workspace installs is: gnome.display.manager 

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
 
  On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 3:22 p.m., Kevin Fenzi wrote:   On 
Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 09:58:30AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 08:56 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 10:58 +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > Hello maintainers!
> > > 
> > > Let me announce a new release of Mock v5.0 (the chroot build environment
> > > manager for building RPMs).
> > > 
> > > This release release brings lots of changes, though the one that I'd
> > > like to underline is that we turned --use-bootstrap-image ON by default.
> > > This effectively means that Mock uses Podman to pull the bootstrap image
> > > from image registries (instead of installing it from scratch with `dnf
> > > --installroot`).  Thus Podman is now in `Recommends:`, not just
> > > `Suggests:`. Should you have any issues, you can temporarily revert this
> > > change with `--no-bootstrap-image` (--scrub=all first!).  Alternatively
> > > set `config_opts["use_bootstrap_image"] = False` in configuration.
> > 
> > Unfortunately this seems to be broken on Rawhide, whether you use the
> > 'fedora-40' or 'fedora-rawhide' name:
> 
> Update: nirik has fixed this for now. We think the Rawhide nightly
> script is messing up the registry when it runs, he'll try and fix that
> later.

And I think thats now fixed (was some leftover armhfp stuff. ;) 

kevin
  
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: dnf conflict in rawhide Docker container in GitHub Action

2023-08-10 Thread Chris Kelley

I see, thanks for the advice! I made that change and job's a good 'un.

Cheers,

Chris

On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 at 20:38, Adam Williamson 
wrote:

> On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 19:07 +, Chris Kelley wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have a GitHub Action (
> https://github.com/dogtagpki/jss/actions/runs/5810230552/job/15794978022)
> that fails due to a conflict between dnf and dnf5 when using the rawhide
> docker image. I have been trying to keep up with the dnf/dnf5 revert story,
> but I may have missed something about the current state of
> affairs/expectations around it working without issue. I am not sure to whom
> I should raise this issue, any suggestions welcome - thanks!
>
> Not sure what the specific issue is here, but in general, we recommend
> against pulling from the Docker registry, as it is not updated very
> often. It's much better to pull from registry.fedoraproject.org or
> quay.io , as those are updated with every Rawhide compose.
> --
> Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
> Fedora QA
> Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
> https://www.happyassassin.net
>
>
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: dnf conflict in rawhide Docker container in GitHub Action

2023-08-10 Thread Adam Williamson

On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 19:07 +, Chris Kelley wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> I have a GitHub Action 
> (https://github.com/dogtagpki/jss/actions/runs/5810230552/job/15794978022) 
> that fails due to a conflict between dnf and dnf5 when using the rawhide 
> docker image. I have been trying to keep up with the dnf/dnf5 revert story, 
> but I may have missed something about the current state of 
> affairs/expectations around it working without issue. I am not sure to whom I 
> should raise this issue, any suggestions welcome - thanks!

Not sure what the specific issue is here, but in general, we recommend
against pulling from the Docker registry, as it is not updated very
often. It's much better to pull from registry.fedoraproject.org or
quay.io , as those are updated with every Rawhide compose.
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Mock v5.0 released (and mock-core-configs v39)

2023-08-10 Thread Kevin Fenzi

On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 09:58:30AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 08:56 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 10:58 +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > Hello maintainers!
> > > 
> > > Let me announce a new release of Mock v5.0 (the chroot build environment
> > > manager for building RPMs).
> > > 
> > > This release release brings lots of changes, though the one that I'd
> > > like to underline is that we turned --use-bootstrap-image ON by default.
> > > This effectively means that Mock uses Podman to pull the bootstrap image
> > > from image registries (instead of installing it from scratch with `dnf
> > > --installroot`).  Thus Podman is now in `Recommends:`, not just
> > > `Suggests:`. Should you have any issues, you can temporarily revert this
> > > change with `--no-bootstrap-image` (--scrub=all first!).  Alternatively
> > > set `config_opts["use_bootstrap_image"] = False` in configuration.
> > 
> > Unfortunately this seems to be broken on Rawhide, whether you use the
> > 'fedora-40' or 'fedora-rawhide' name:
> 
> Update: nirik has fixed this for now. We think the Rawhide nightly
> script is messing up the registry when it runs, he'll try and fix that
> later.

And I think thats now fixed (was some leftover armhfp stuff. ;) 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

dnf conflict in rawhide Docker container in GitHub Action

2023-08-10 Thread Chris Kelley

Hello all,

I have a GitHub Action 
(https://github.com/dogtagpki/jss/actions/runs/5810230552/job/15794978022) that 
fails due to a conflict between dnf and dnf5 when using the rawhide docker 
image. I have been trying to keep up with the dnf/dnf5 revert story, but I may 
have missed something about the current state of affairs/expectations around it 
working without issue. I am not sure to whom I should raise this issue, any 
suggestions welcome - thanks!

Cheers,

Chris
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2023-08-10)

2023-08-10 Thread Fabio Valentini

=
#fedora-meeting-2: FESCo (2023-08-10)
=

Meeting started by decathorpe at 17:01:15 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-08-10/fesco.2023-08-10-17.01.log.html
.

Meeting summary
---
* Init Process  (decathorpe, 17:01:36)
  * LINK: Schedule

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3FVUSDTEXCSIDNBNYLQWDLGVHDVRFBO3/
(decathorpe, 17:05:40)

* #3038  New (clarified) voting rules for FESCo  (decathorpe, 17:06:45)
  * LINK:

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MJ5OJZM3VT5WW4GGEY5TGGHHRCVQXZBJ/
(bcotton, 17:12:56)
  * AGREED: Suggestions will be taken into account for a fesco-docs PR
(+4, 0, -0)  (decathorpe, 17:20:17)
  * ACTION: zbyszek to do do the drafting and PR preparing  (decathorpe,
17:20:47)

* #3053 Change: Anaconda WebUI for Fedora Workstation by default -
  delayed for Testable Deadline  (decathorpe, 17:21:19)
  * AGREED: Wait with making any further decisions until FESCo has
either 1. more information, or 2. the next FESCo meeting (whichever
happens first) (+4, 0, -0)  (decathorpe, 17:42:15)

* Next week's 晴  (decathorpe, 17:42:36)
  * ACTION: zbyszek to chair next week's meeting (2023-08-17)
(decathorpe, 17:45:29)

* Open Floor  (decathorpe, 17:45:34)

Meeting ended at 17:50:28 UTC.

Action Items

* zbyszek to do do the drafting and PR preparing
* zbyszek to chair next week's meeting (2023-08-17)

Action Items, by person
---
* zbyszek
  * zbyszek to do do the drafting and PR preparing
  * zbyszek to chair next week's meeting (2023-08-17)
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)

People Present (lines said)
---
* decathorpe (50)
* zbyszek_ (22)
* nirik (18)
* zodbot (15)
* adamw_irc (14)
* bcotton (8)
* dcantrell (6)
* mhayden (4)
* Son_Goku (2)
* zbyszek (0)
* sgallagh (0)
* mhroncok (0)
* Conan_Kudo (0)
* Pharaoh_Atem (0)
* King_InuYasha (0)
* Sir_Gallantmon (0)
* Eighth_Doctor (0)
* tstellar (0)

Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.4

.. _`MeetBot`: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Mock v5.0 released (and mock-core-configs v39)

2023-08-10 Thread Adam Williamson

On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 08:56 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 10:58 +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Hello maintainers!
> > 
> > Let me announce a new release of Mock v5.0 (the chroot build environment
> > manager for building RPMs).
> > 
> > This release release brings lots of changes, though the one that I'd
> > like to underline is that we turned --use-bootstrap-image ON by default.
> > This effectively means that Mock uses Podman to pull the bootstrap image
> > from image registries (instead of installing it from scratch with `dnf
> > --installroot`).  Thus Podman is now in `Recommends:`, not just
> > `Suggests:`. Should you have any issues, you can temporarily revert this
> > change with `--no-bootstrap-image` (--scrub=all first!).  Alternatively
> > set `config_opts["use_bootstrap_image"] = False` in configuration.
> 
> Unfortunately this seems to be broken on Rawhide, whether you use the
> 'fedora-40' or 'fedora-rawhide' name:

Update: nirik has fixed this for now. We think the Rawhide nightly
script is messing up the registry when it runs, he'll try and fix that
later.
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: RPM packaging help

2023-08-10 Thread Adam Williamson

On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 09:43 -0400, Andrew Heath wrote:
> All,
> My name is Andrew, and I have been working with the Fedora Infra team and
> we are trying to create some RPMs for some projects that we are working on,
> one of the RPMs we need to create is for the Ansible receptor[1
> ]. I have a copy of the spec file from
> downstream Red Hat that gives some guidance but where its a mix of python
> and go-lang I was wondering if I could have some guidance from more
> experienced packers on how to package up the application correctly so that
> we can get the package in use for the Fedora Infra.

Well, it seems like it's mostly a Go library (or some Go libraries),
with a Python CLI and associated Python library.

I would think you can package it mostly following the Go guidelines,
but also at appropriate points in the spec drop into the receptorctl
subdirectory and use the modern Python macros - see the Python sample
spec,
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_example_spec_file
- to install the Python bits (I think the %pyproject stuff should work
for this as it has what looks like a valid pyproject.toml ).

I'd then put the receptorctl bits - the Python lib and the CLI command
- into a subpackage that requires the main package(s), since it seems
to be essentially an optional bit...
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Schedule for Today's FESCo Meeting (2023-08-10)

2023-08-10 Thread Fabio Valentini

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Thursday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.libera.chat.

Note that the IRC <-> Matrix bridge is down, so please join
the meeting on IRC directly.

To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto

or run:
  date -d '2023-08-10 17:00 UTC'

Links to all issues to be discussed can be found at:
https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda

= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =

Change: Enable auto-updates by default in Fedora Kinoite
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3042
APPROVED (+6, 0, -0)

Change: Migrate NetworkManager ifcfg profiles to keyfile
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3043
APPROVED (+6, 0, -0)

Change: IBus 1.5.29
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3044
APPROVED (+6, 0, -0)

Change: GNU Toolchain Update (gcc 13.2, binutils 2.40, glibc 2.38, gdb 13.2)
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3045
APPROVED (+8, 0, -0)

Change: Use Noto fonts for Indic (Indian language) scripts
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3048
APPROVED (+3, 0, -0)

Updates policy exception request for llhttp in F37
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3049
APPROVED (+4, 0, -0)

= Followups =

New (clarified) voting rules for FESCo
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3038

= New business =

Change: Anaconda WebUI for Fedora Workstation by default - delayed for
Testable Deadline
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3053

= Open Floor =

For more complete details, please visit each individual
issue.  The report of the agenda items can be found at
https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda

If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can
reply to this e-mail, file a new issue at
https://pagure.io/fesco, e-mail me directly, or bring it
up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note
that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Mock v5.0 released (and mock-core-configs v39)

2023-08-10 Thread Adam Williamson

On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 10:58 +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello maintainers!
> 
> Let me announce a new release of Mock v5.0 (the chroot build environment
> manager for building RPMs).
> 
> This release release brings lots of changes, though the one that I'd
> like to underline is that we turned --use-bootstrap-image ON by default.
> This effectively means that Mock uses Podman to pull the bootstrap image
> from image registries (instead of installing it from scratch with `dnf
> --installroot`).  Thus Podman is now in `Recommends:`, not just
> `Suggests:`. Should you have any issues, you can temporarily revert this
> change with `--no-bootstrap-image` (--scrub=all first!).  Alternatively
> set `config_opts["use_bootstrap_image"] = False` in configuration.

Unfortunately this seems to be broken on Rawhide, whether you use the
'fedora-40' or 'fedora-rawhide' name:

[adamw@xps13a gnome-shell (rawhide %)]$ mock -r fedora-40-x86_64 --scrub=all
...
[adamw@xps13a gnome-shell (rawhide %)]$ mock -r fedora-40-x86_64 --install nano
...
Start(bootstrap): cleaning package manager metadata
Finish(bootstrap): cleaning package manager metadata
INFO: Using bootstrap image: registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide
INFO: Pulling image: registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # podman pull registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide

[adamw@xps13a gnome-shell (rawhide %)]$ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 
--scrub=all
...
[adamw@xps13a gnome-shell (rawhide %)]$ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --install 
nano
...
Start(bootstrap): cleaning package manager metadata
Finish(bootstrap): cleaning package manager metadata
INFO: Using bootstrap image: registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide
INFO: Pulling image: registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # podman pull registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

mkosi v15

2023-08-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek

Hi,

we've released mkosi 15 (and 15.1 a few hours later ;)) and 15.1
has been built in F39 and rawhide.

It is a major rewrite of the codebase, so various regressions and
problems are likely. Please report packaging issues in bugzilla,
and all other things upstream on github.

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: RPM packaging help

2023-08-10 Thread Priscila Gutierres

Hello Andrew,

I have some experience with golang and python packaging, but working on
RHEL, not Fedora.
But we can walk through together to decipher  it.

Priscila.

On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 10:43 AM Andrew Heath  wrote:

> All,
> My name is Andrew, and I have been working with the Fedora Infra team and
> we are trying to create some RPMs for some projects that we are working on,
> one of the RPMs we need to create is for the Ansible receptor[1
> ]. I have a copy of the spec file
> from downstream Red Hat that gives some guidance but where its a mix of
> python and go-lang I was wondering if I could have some guidance from more
> experienced packers on how to package up the application correctly so that
> we can get the package in use for the Fedora Infra.
>
> Links:
> [1]: https://github.com/ansible/receptor
>
> --
> Sincerely,
> Andrew Heath
> aheath1...@gmail.com
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

RPM packaging help

2023-08-10 Thread Andrew Heath

All,
My name is Andrew, and I have been working with the Fedora Infra team and
we are trying to create some RPMs for some projects that we are working on,
one of the RPMs we need to create is for the Ansible receptor[1
]. I have a copy of the spec file from
downstream Red Hat that gives some guidance but where its a mix of python
and go-lang I was wondering if I could have some guidance from more
experienced packers on how to package up the application correctly so that
we can get the package in use for the Fedora Infra.

Links:
[1]: https://github.com/ansible/receptor

-- 
Sincerely,
Andrew Heath
aheath1...@gmail.com
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2229823] perl-Test-Harness-3.46 is available

2023-08-10 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229823



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-0499640acc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0499640acc


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229823

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202229823%23c5
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2231059] New: perl-Authen-SASL-2.1700 is available

2023-08-10 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231059

Bug ID: 2231059
   Summary: perl-Authen-SASL-2.1700 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Authen-SASL
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: anon.am...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, st...@silug.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 2.1700
Upstream release that is considered latest: 2.1700
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.16-30.fc39
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Authen-SASL/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/6627/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Authen-SASL


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231059

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202231059%23c0
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2229823] perl-Test-Harness-3.46 is available

2023-08-10 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229823

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Harness-3.46-1.fc
   ||40
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Last Closed||2023-08-10 12:04:35



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-752be03d37 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229823

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202229823%23c3
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2229823] perl-Test-Harness-3.46 is available

2023-08-10 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229823

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Test-Harness-3.46-1.fc |perl-Test-Harness-3.46-1.fc
   |40  |40
   ||perl-Test-Harness-3.46-1.fc
   ||39



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-487022dcc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229823

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202229823%23c4
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2229823] perl-Test-Harness-3.46 is available

2023-08-10 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229823



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-487022dcc9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-487022dcc9


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229823

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202229823%23c2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2023-08-10 Thread sgallagh

Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
   ELN SIG on 2023-08-11 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
   At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat

The meeting will be about:



Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10531/

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2229823] perl-Test-Harness-3.46 is available

2023-08-10 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229823

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-752be03d37 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-752be03d37


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229823

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202229823%23c1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Tiny] PR #3: Add perl-HTTP-Tiny-https package for delivering of HTTPs support

2023-08-10 Thread Michal Josef Špaček


mspacek commented on the pull-request: `Add perl-HTTP-Tiny-https package for 
delivering of HTTPs support` that you are following:
``
Fixed  perl(IO::Socket::IP)  (moved to perl-HTTP-Tiny)
Added perl_boostrap check.
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Tiny/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2229332] perl-App-cpm-0.997013 is available

2023-08-10 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229332

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-App-cpm-0.997.013-1.fc |perl-App-cpm-0.997.013-1.fc
   |40  |40
   ||perl-App-cpm-0.997.013-1.fc
   ||39



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-ca6952e0d0 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229332

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202229332%23c4
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2229332] perl-App-cpm-0.997013 is available

2023-08-10 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229332

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-App-cpm-0.997.013-1.fc
   ||40
Last Closed||2023-08-10 11:16:35



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-e3307ab8eb has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229332

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202229332%23c3
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230810.n.0 changes

2023-08-10 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230809.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230810.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images:  2
Added packages:  1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages:   55
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  29.77 MiB
Size of dropped packages:29.83 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   2.59 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   23.14 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: Kinoite/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230810.n.0.iso
Image: LXQt live aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-LXQt-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20230810.n.0.iso
Image: i3 live aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-i3-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20230810.n.0.iso
Image: Workstation live aarch64
Path: 
Workstation/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20230810.n.0.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: LXDE live x86_64
Path: Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-LXDE-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20230809.n.1.iso
Image: Security live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20230809.n.1.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: yosyshq-abc-0.31-1.20230804gitbb64142.fc40
Summary: Sequential logic synthesis and formal verification
RPMs:yosyshq-abc yosyshq-abc-devel yosyshq-abc-libs
Size:29.77 MiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: abc-1.01-40.git20230708.fc39
Summary: Sequential logic synthesis and formal verification
RPMs:abc abc-devel abc-libs
Size:29.83 MiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  acpid-2.0.34-5.fc40
Old package:  acpid-2.0.34-3.fc39
Summary:  ACPI Event Daemon
RPMs: acpid
Size: 131.19 KiB
Size change:  -34 B
Changelog:
  * Wed Aug 09 2023 Jaroslav ??karvada  - 2.0.34-4
  - Converted license to SPDX

  * Wed Aug 09 2023 Jaroslav ??karvada  - 2.0.34-5
  - SPDX license fix


Package:  asahi-installer-0.6.2-1.fc40
Old package:  asahi-installer-0.5.7-1.fc39
Summary:  Asahi Linux installer
RPMs: python3-asahi_firmware
Size: 148.98 KiB
Size change:  912 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Aug 08 2023 Davide Cavalca  - 0.6.2-1
  - Update to 0.6.2; Fixes: RHBZ#2229955


Package:  awscli-1.29.23-1.fc40
Old package:  awscli-1.29.22-1.fc40
Summary:  Universal Command Line Environment for AWS
RPMs: awscli
Size: 3.37 MiB
Size change:  643 B
Changelog:
  * Wed Aug 09 2023 Gwyn Ciesla  - 1.29.23-1
  - 1.29.23


Package:  ceph-2:18.2.0-1.fc40
Old package:  ceph-2:18.2.0-1.fc39
Summary:  User space components of the Ceph file system
RPMs: ceph ceph-base ceph-common ceph-exporter ceph-fuse 
ceph-grafana-dashboards ceph-immutable-object-cache ceph-mds ceph-mgr 
ceph-mgr-cephadm ceph-mgr-dashboard ceph-mgr-diskprediction-local 
ceph-mgr-k8sevents ceph-mgr-modules-core ceph-mgr-rook ceph-mib ceph-mon 
ceph-osd ceph-prometheus-alerts ceph-radosgw ceph-resource-agents ceph-selinux 
ceph-test ceph-volume cephadm cephfs-mirror cephfs-shell cephfs-top 
libcephfs-devel libcephfs2 libcephsqlite libcephsqlite-devel librados-devel 
librados2 libradospp-devel libradosstriper-devel libradosstriper1 librbd-devel 
librbd1 librgw-devel librgw2 python3-ceph-argparse python3-ceph-common 
python3-cephfs python3-rados python3-rbd python3-rgw rados-objclass-devel 
rbd-fuse rbd-mirror rbd-nbd
Size: 417.40 MiB
Size change:  -444.05 KiB

Package:  chrony-4.4-1.fc40
Old package:  chrony-4.4-0.4.pre2.fc39
Summary:  An NTP client/server
RPMs: chrony
Size: 1.33 MiB
Size change:  1.71 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Aug 09 2023 Miroslav Lichvar  4.4-1
  - update to 4.4
  - require tzdata (#2218368)


Package:  cockpit-ostree-1:196-1.fc40
Old package:  cockpit-ostree-1:195-1.fc39
Summary:  Cockpit user interface for rpm-ostree
RPMs: cockpit-ostree
Size: 541.56 KiB
Size change:  -84.01 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Aug 09 2023 Packit  - 1:196-1
  - Update to PatternFly 5


Package:  cockpit-podman-74-1.fc40
Old package:  cockpit-podman-73-1.fc39
Summary:  Cockpit component for Podman containers
RPMs: cockpit-podman
Size: 734.13 KiB
Size change:  -70.82 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Aug 09 2023 Packit  - 74-1
  - PatternFly 5
  - Bug fixes and translation updates


Package:  cvc5-1.0.5-3.fc40
Old package:  cvc5-1.0.5-2.fc39
Summary:  Automatic theorem prover for SMT problems
RPMs: cvc5 cvc5-devel cvc5-java cvc5-libs python3-cvc5
Size: 22.27 MiB
Size change:  4.50 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Aug 09 2023 Jerry James  - 1.0.5-3
  - Build with yosyshq-abc instead of abc


Package:  fedora-release-40-0.2
Old package:  fedora-release-40-0.1
Summary:  Fedora release files
RPMs: fedora-release fedora-release-budgie fedora-release-cinnamon 
fedora-release-cloud fedora-release-common fedora-release-compneuro 
fedora-release-container fedora-release-coreos fedora-release-designsuite 
fedora-release-i3 fedora-release-identity-basic

[Bug 2229332] perl-App-cpm-0.997013 is available

2023-08-10 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229332



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-ca6952e0d0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ca6952e0d0


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229332

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202229332%23c2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2229332] perl-App-cpm-0.997013 is available

2023-08-10 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229332

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-e3307ab8eb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-e3307ab8eb


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229332

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202229332%23c1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: dlmalloc CC0 license (was Re: Packaging a cross-compilation environment (wasi-libc))

2023-08-10 Thread Jan Staněk

Hi Daniel,

"Daniel P. Berrangé"  writes:
> I'm reviewing another package (sgxsdk) which also includes a copy
> of dlmalloc with the CC0 license declaration. I wondered if you
> ever made contact with Doug Lea around this question ?

I recall trying to reach him via mail and not being successful;
however, since at that time we were pivoting to use another malloc
implementation, I did not push that very far (i.e. trying to find other
e-mails than the one from changelog).
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com   irc: jstanek


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Mock v5.0 released (and mock-core-configs v39)

2023-08-10 Thread Pavel Raiskup

Hello maintainers!

Let me announce a new release of Mock v5.0 (the chroot build environment
manager for building RPMs).

This release release brings lots of changes, though the one that I'd
like to underline is that we turned --use-bootstrap-image ON by default.
This effectively means that Mock uses Podman to pull the bootstrap image
from image registries (instead of installing it from scratch with `dnf
--installroot`).  Thus Podman is now in `Recommends:`, not just
`Suggests:`. Should you have any issues, you can temporarily revert this
change with `--no-bootstrap-image` (--scrub=all first!).  Alternatively
set `config_opts["use_bootstrap_image"] = False` in configuration.

Mock 5.0 also stops using '/sbin/useradd' inside the chroot, but uses
'/sbin/useradd --prefix ' _on host_ to modify the in-chroot
/etc/passwd.  This change passed all our testing, but there's a
potential for bugs.

The mock-core-configs-v39 brings also the Fedora 39 configuration as it
is now branched from Rawhide (Rawhide is 40 now in Mock).  Several folks
already reported that Fedora Copr builds are broken for
fedora-rawhide-*, sorry for inconveniences.  This is being resolved
right now, we are pushing mock-5.0 into the Fedora Copr production.

In case of any trouble, please report issues upstream:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/issues

Full release notes:
https://rpm-software-management.github.io/mock/Release-Notes-5.0

The updated packages are in Bodhi:

[Fedora 38]: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0ca9df2164
[Fedora 37]: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-c65d483a5c
[EPEL 9]: 
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e03c59145d
[EPEL 8]: 
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-a5c155a6c0

Happy building!
Pavel


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Tiny] PR #3: Add perl-HTTP-Tiny-https package for delivering of HTTPs support

2023-08-10 Thread Jitka Plesnikova


jplesnik commented on the pull-request: `Add perl-HTTP-Tiny-https package for 
delivering of HTTPs support` that you are following:
``
> This patch makes https tests optional in perl-HTTP-Tiny-tests. That goes 
> against current practice we (at least I) have in tests subpackages: We tend 
> to enforce all test features in tests subpackages. My approach has two 
> advantages: The tests are deterministic and the https feature can be 
> controlled with perl_bootstrap macro.

I also  prefer to run all tests, if it is possible. 

> When you add a hard dependency on perl-HTTP-Tiny-https into many packages, it 
> could happen that you make the packages uninstallable while bootstrapping and 
> that would lead to build cycles as Jitka pointed. I'd rather wrap the hard 
> Requires on IO::Socket::SSL in perl-HTTP-Tiny-https with perl_boostrap 
> condition. On one hand, that would make the perl-HTTP-Tiny-https dummy while 
> bootstrapping. On the other hand, it would centralize the boostrapping to 
> perl-HTTP-Tiny.spec. With your current approach you will have to go after 
> every of the hard Requires and condition them with perl_bootstrap on 
> case-by-case basis.
> 

That's a good idea and it will prevent new possible cycles when anybody adds 
perl-HTTP-Tiny-https to its package.
> I don't say that your approach is utterly wrong, it has it's own potential. I 
> only say that I would use a different approach.


``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Tiny/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Tiny] PR #3: Add perl-HTTP-Tiny-https package for delivering of HTTPs support

2023-08-10 Thread Jitka Plesnikova


jplesnik commented on the pull-request: `Add perl-HTTP-Tiny-https package for 
delivering of HTTPs support` that you are following:
``
Please move perl(IO::Socket::IP) to perl-HTTP-Tiny
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Tiny/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Tiny] PR #3: Add perl-HTTP-Tiny-https package for delivering of HTTPs support

2023-08-10 Thread Petr Pisar


ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Add perl-HTTP-Tiny-https package for 
delivering of HTTPs support` that you are following:
``
This patch makes https tests optional in perl-HTTP-Tiny-tests. That goes 
against current practice we (at least I) have in tests subpackages: We tend to 
enforce all test features in tests subpackages. My approach has two advantages: 
The tests are deterministic and the https feature can be controlled with 
perl_bootstrap macro.

When you add a hard dependency on perl-HTTP-Tiny-https into many packages, it 
could happen that you make the packages uninstallable while bootstrapping and 
that would lead to build cycles as Jitka pointed. I'd rather wrap the hard 
Requires on IO::Socket::SSL in perl-HTTP-Tiny-https with perl_boostrap 
condition. On one hand, that would make the perl-HTTP-Tiny-https dummy while 
bootstrapping. On the other hand, it would centralize the boostrapping to 
perl-HTTP-Tiny.spec. With your current approach you will have to go after every 
of the hard Requires and condition them with perl_bootstrap on case-by-case 
basis.

I don't say that your approach is utterly wrong, it has it's own potential. I 
only say that I would use a different approach.
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Tiny/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2230861] New: perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom-1.26 is available

2023-08-10 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2230861

Bug ID: 2230861
   Summary: perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom-1.26 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: mspa...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: mspa...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
rland...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 1.26
Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.26
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.24-2.fc39
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Lingua-EN-Fathom/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/6661/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2230861

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202230861%23c0
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Tiny] PR #3: Add perl-HTTP-Tiny-https package for delivering of HTTPs support

2023-08-10 Thread Jitka Plesnikova


jplesnik commented on the pull-request: `Add perl-HTTP-Tiny-https package for 
delivering of HTTPs support` that you are following:
``
BTW, before submitting, it will be great to have list of packages which should 
require the sub-package perl-HTTP-Tiny-https and update them (e.g. perl-CPAN)
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Tiny/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Tiny] PR #3: Add perl-HTTP-Tiny-https package for delivering of HTTPs support

2023-08-10 Thread Jitka Plesnikova


jplesnik commented on the pull-request: `Add perl-HTTP-Tiny-https package for 
delivering of HTTPs support` that you are following:
``
Please add perl-HTTP-Tiny-https as Requires only with perl_bootstrap condition 
to prevent dependency cycle and also add 'openssl' it is needed for tests.
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Tiny/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Tiny] PR #3: Add perl-HTTP-Tiny-https package for delivering of HTTPs support

2023-08-10 Thread Jitka Plesnikova


jplesnik commented on the pull-request: `Add perl-HTTP-Tiny-https package for 
delivering of HTTPs support` that you are following:
``
Please leave perl(IO::Socket::IP) in both packages main and tests
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Tiny/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

40 matches

Mail list logo