[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-d2e65a75f1 wordpress-5.1.17-1.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing davix-0.8.5-1.el7 iotop-c-1.25-1.el7 libabigail-2.4-1.el7 ne-3.3.3-1.el7 Details about builds: davix-0.8.5-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-135442afe8) Toolkit for http based file management Update Information: New upstream release 0.8.5 ChangeLog: * Fri Oct 20 2023 Mihai Patrascoiu - 0.8.5-1 - New upstream release 0.8.5 - Fix CVE 2023-38545 in the bundled curl library (EPEL 7 and 8) * Wed Jul 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.8.4-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild iotop-c-1.25-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-f3560b61a1) Simple top-like I/O monitor (implemented in C) Update Information: Update to latest ver 1.25 ChangeLog: * Sat Oct 14 2023 Boian Bonev - 1.25-1 - Update to latest ver 1.25 libabigail-2.4-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-25f01eb34b) Set of ABI analysis tools Update Information: Update to upstream 2.4 tarball ChangeLog: * Fri Oct 20 2023 Dodji Seketeli - 2.4-1 - Update to upstream 2.4 tarball - Support soname bumped to libabigail.so.3.0.0 ne-3.3.3-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-d7fb4e9efd) ne, the nice editor Update Information: First release ChangeLog: * Thu Oct 19 2023 Sebastiano Vigna - 3.3.3-1 - First release * Thu Jul 20 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 3.3.2-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild * Thu Jan 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 3.3.2-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild * Tue Oct 25 2022 Sebastiano Vigna - 3.3.2-2 - Hardened build ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244850] EPEL9 request: perl-XML-Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244850 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-708ed34cc7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-708ed34cc7 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244850 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244850%23c2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2241969] Please branch and build perl-Mail-Box in epel9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241969 --- Comment #9 from Sergio Basto --- you need enable repo crb for example with: `dnf config-manager --enable crb` dnf install perl-Mail-Box Dependencies resolved. == PackageArchitectureVersion Repository Size == Installing: perl-Mail-Box noarch 3.010-1.el9 epel 372 k Installing dependencies: perl-Convert-BinHexnoarch 1.125-13.el9 epel44 k perl-Data-OptList noarch 0.110-17.el9 appstream 27 k perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction noarch 0.14-16.el9 crb 18 k perl-Email-Date-Format noarch 1.005-20.el9 epel18 k perl-Email-Simple noarch 2.216-6.el9 epel34 k perl-Encode-Locale noarch 1.05-21.el9 appstream 20 k perl-File-FcntlLockx86_64 0.22-28.el9 epel42 k perl-File-Remove noarch 1.60-4.el9 crb 28 k perl-Font-AFM noarch 1.20-38.el9 epel21 k perl-Geography-Countries noarch 2009041301-34.el9 epel21 k perl-HTML-Formatternoarch 2.16-17.el9 epel52 k perl-HTML-Parser x86_64 3.76-3.el9 appstream 124 k perl-HTML-Tagset noarch 3.20-47.el9 appstream 19 k perl-HTML-Tree noarch 1:5.07-16.el9 crb216 k perl-HTTP-Date noarch 6.05-7.el9 appstream 25 k perl-HTTP-Message noarch 6.29-3.el9 appstream 99 k perl-Hash-Ordered noarch 0.014-1.el9 epel40 k perl-I18N-Langinfo x86_64 0.19-480.el9 appstream 24 k perl-IO-HTML noarch 1.004-4.el9 appstream 29 k perl-IO-stringynoarch 2.113-7.el9 crb 67 k perl-Importer noarch 0.026-4.el9 appstream 40 k perl-LWP-MediaTypesnoarch 6.04-9.el9 appstream 34 k perl-MIME-Charset noarch 1.012.2-15.el9 appstream 49 k perl-MIME-Typesnoarch 2.18-4.el9 crb 69 k perl-MIME-toolsnoarch 5.509-11.el9 epel 231 k perl-Mail-Message noarch 3.013-2.el9 epel 468 k perl-Mail-Transportnoarch 3.005-1.el9 epel56 k perl-MailTools noarch 2.21-9.el9 appstream 111 k perl-Net-SMTP-SSL noarch 1.04-16.el9 appstream 13 k perl-Object-HashBase noarch 0.009-7.el9 appstream 26 k perl-Object-Realize-Later noarch 0.21-18.el9 epel22 k perl-Package-Generator noarch 1.106-23.el9 appstream 24 k perl-Params-Util x86_64 1.102-5.el9 appstream 34 k perl-Sub-Exporter noarch 0.987-27.el9 appstream 73 k perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive noarch 0.001013-16.el9 crb 22 k perl-Sub-Install noarch 0.928-28.el9 appstream 23 k perl-TeX-Hyphennoarch 1.18-5.el9 epel36 k perl-Term-Size-Perlx86_64 0.031-12.el9 appstream 22 k perl-Term-Tablenoarch 0.015-8.el9 appstream 36 k
Re: Fedora Linux 39 Final blocker status summary #3
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said: > 6. distribution - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2242759 - NEW > dnf system-upgrade fails on some RPi4 due to system boot date that pre- > dates gpg key > > We're still kinda kicking around ideas for "fixing" this, but I think > if push comes to shove, we'll wind up revoting or waiving it as not > practically fixable. Not adding to the ticket (because "me too" is not useful there), but... I think Fedora should include SOME type of "fake hwclock"-type thing for systems with no RTC (make a systemd service depend on /dev/rtc not existing?), as other RPi-targeted distros do. This isn't RPi-specific, a number of the small boards have no RTC. I do typically add an RTC to my Pis, but not always (for various reasons). -- Chris Adams ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora Linux 39 Final blocker status summary #3
Hi folks! We're still trying to get F39 done, so time for another status update... Action summary == Accepted blockers - 1. kexec-tools - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2243068 - VERIFIED: releng to push the fix stable 2. mutter - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2241632 - ASSIGNED: desktop team (and adamwill) to keep trying to come up with a fix 3. shim - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2113005 - NEW: assume this will be waived 4. uboot-tools - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2241252 - ASSIGNED: ARM team (pbrobinson) to fix it 5. uboot-tools - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2244305 - ASSIGNED: ARM team to evaluate and fix if possible, ARM/QA to test on more systems if possible 6. distribution - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2242759 - NEW: anyone at all to come up with a genius fix, otherwise we'll likely have to document this Bug-by-bug detail = Accepted blockers - 1. kexec-tools - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2243068 - VERIFIED kdump is enabled by default on desktops This is basically fixed, just waiting to be pushed stable. 2. mutter - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2241632 - ASSIGNED Netinstall ISO renders a black screen when using kickstart install (bare metal and VM) Well, we kinda had a fix for this, but it turns out to break something even worse (now anaconda isn't visible on the Workstation live image). So we're still stuck trying to find a perfect fix, unfortunately. Desktop team plus me to keep cranking away on it. 3. shim - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2113005 - NEW Live image made with BOOTX64.EFI from latest shim-x64-15.6-2 fails to boot on some boards Let's just assume this is gonna be waived. 4. uboot-tools - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2241252 - ASSIGNED Fedora-Workstation-39_Beta-1.1 boots to a black screen on Raspberry Pi 4 Peter says "So we've basically got to the bottom of the problem and worked out the issue, I now just need to come up with a fix.", so that's what we're waiting on. 5. uboot-tools - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2244305 - ASSIGNED Fedora Server 39 does not boot on Raspberry Pi 4 (RPi4) from microSD card slot This one's also waiting on ARM team (i.e. Peter), but seems somewhat less clear-cut of a blocker, so we're kinda waiting for his take on that, plus testing from other Raspberry Pi owners would be useful. 6. distribution - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2242759 - NEW dnf system-upgrade fails on some RPi4 due to system boot date that pre- dates gpg key We're still kinda kicking around ideas for "fixing" this, but I think if push comes to shove, we'll wind up revoting or waiving it as not practically fixable. -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2242157] perl-Math-Random-Secure for EL9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242157 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman --- I have released FEDORA-EPEL-2023-c76d4daf54 which provides perl-Crypt-Random-Source and perl-Math-Random-ISAAC. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-c76d4daf54 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242157 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202242157%23c2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Analysis of the overhead of frame pointers on gcc compiles
Today I've read (twice) that the overhead of frame pointers on the
runtime of the compiler, GCC, is 10%. This number is nonsense. The
actual overhead is 1%, and I have done the tests that show this.
I want to note up front that it was also claimed that GCC slowed down
by 10% between Fedora 37 & 38 (when frame pointers were introduced).
However frame pointers have been disabled in our GCC build on all
architectures for 9 months, since before Fedora 38 was released. So
if there has been such a slowdown (which I don't know) then it cannot
be anything to do with frame pointers. At the same time GCC was
upgraded from 12 to 13, such a signicant new release that claims
comparing versions of Fedora are not valid.
- - -
In my tests I recompiled GCC with frame pointers enabled (see
gcc-add-fp.patch), and then built qemu with 'make clean; time make -j32'.
I took the 'user' time over 3 runs. The average user time was 1135
seconds.
I then recompiled binutils with frame pointers disabled (see
binutils-no-fp.patch), and installed it alongside
gcc-13.2.1-4.fc40.x86_64 (which as noted above has frame pointers
disabled). The average user time over 3 runs was 1122 seconds.
With frame pointers: 1135 seconds
Without frame pointers: 1122 seconds
Overhead: 1.01%
Note also that the wallclock time in every case was either 41 or 42
seconds, so in practical terms for users there is no difference with
or without frame pointers.
You may also note that I didn't recompile any libraries (so in my
tests, frame pointers are used in both cases). However using
profiling we can show that this doesn't matter. The total time used
during the make -j32 run by each binary and DSO was:
58.41% lto1
14.97% cc1
11.47% Linux kernel
7.68% libc.so.6
4.31% as
1.54% libbfd-2.41-7.fc40.so
0.64% libpython3.12.so.1.0
0.26% ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
0.09% ld.bfd
0.00% python3.12
(everything else under 1%)
Note the only library which consumes any significant time is libc, but
at under 8% it would hardly affect the test times. libbfd is actually
part of binutils so it was recompiled with & without frame pointers.
Full raw results are in the attached file.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests.
http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v
Q: How much are libraries used?
Children Self Shared Object
+ 97.79% 7.68% libc.so.6◆
+ 65.25%58.41% lto1 ▒
+ 20.62%14.97% cc1 ▒
+ 12.33%11.47% [kernel.kallsyms]▒
+8.08% 4.31% as ▒
+6.03% 1.54% libbfd-2.41-7.fc40.so▒
+1.88% 0.09% ld.bfd ▒
+0.79% 0.64% libpython3.12.so.1.0 ▒
+0.78% 0.00% python3.12 ▒
+0.67% 0.26% ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 ▒
build qemu 'make -j32' (2591 targets)
gcc-13.2.1-4.fc40.x86_64 (FP accidentally turned off)
real0m41.297s
user18m38.587s
sys 2m5.460s
real0m41.218s
user18m36.044s
sys 2m3.838s
real0m41.493s
user18m42.651s
sys 2m4.668s
above + binutils-2.41-8.1.nofp.fc40.x86_64 (FP turned off)
real0m41.357s
user18m39.692s
sys 2m4.310s
real0m41.403s
user18m43.905s
sys 2m4.399s
real0m41.389s
user18m44.637s
sys 2m4.407s
Average user: 1122
binutils-2.41-7.fc40.x86_64 + gcc-13.2.1-4.1.fp.fc40.x86_64 (FP turned on)
real0m41.702s
user18m51.091s
sys 2m3.045s
real0m42.000s
user18m56.555s
sys 2m3.301s
real0m42.029s
user18m58.724s
sys 2m3.922s
Average user: 1135
Overhead of frame pointers: 1135/1122 = 1.01%
diff --git a/gcc.spec b/gcc.spec
index 5d6c7c4..c7774fd 100644
--- a/gcc.spec
+++ b/gcc.spec
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
Summary: Various compilers (C, C++, Objective-C, ...)
Name: gcc
Version: %{gcc_version}
-Release: %{gcc_release}%{?dist}
+Release: %{gcc_release}.1.fp%{?dist}
# libgcc, libgfortran, libgomp, libstdc++ and crtstuff have
# GCC Runtime Exception.
License: GPLv3+ and GPLv3+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ with exceptions and
LGPLv2+ and BSD
@@ -923,7 +923,6 @@ OPT_FLAGS=`echo $OPT_FLAGS|sed -e
's/-flto=auto//g;s/-flto//g;s/-ffat-lto-object
OPT_FLAGS=`echo $OPT_FLAGS|sed -e 's/-m64//g;s/-m32//g;s/-m31//g'`
OPT_FLAGS=`echo $OPT_FLAGS|sed -e 's/-mfpmath=sse/-mfpmath=sse -msse2/g'`
OPT_FLAGS=`echo $OPT_FLAGS|sed -e 's/ -pipe / /g'`
Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 8:46 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: > >ELN SIG on 2023-10-20 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern > >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > > > The meeting will be about: > > > > No agenda set for today, but I'll hold an Open Floor meeting if anyone > has any topics. This week's meeting involved a long discussion of how to resolve LLVM major update and OCAML rebuild issues. = #fedora-meeting: ELN (2023-10-20) = Meeting started by sgallagh at 16:07:11 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-10-20/eln.2023-10-20-16.07.log.html . Meeting summary --- * Init Process (sgallagh, 16:07:24) * Agenda Topics (sgallagh, 16:09:56) * ELNBuildSync (sgallagh, 16:12:05) * LINK: https://sgallagh.wordpress.com/2023/10/13/sausage-factory-fedora-eln-rebuild-strategy/ (sgallagh, 16:12:27) Meeting ended at 17:16:11 UTC. Action Items Action Items, by person --- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --- * sgallagh (84) * yselkowitz (70) * tdawson (15) * jforbes (9) * zodbot_ (8) * zodbot (8) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2242157] perl-Math-Random-Secure for EL9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242157 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Math-Random-Secure for |perl-Math-Random-Secure for |EL9 and EL7 |EL9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242157 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2241969] Please branch and build perl-Mail-Box in epel9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241969 --- Comment #8 from Michael J Gruber --- Hmm. Have you tried installing perl-Mail-Box, though? It FTIs on RHEL9 with epel-testing because it is missing at least: perl-Mail-Box perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction What a rabbit hole... I plead guilty of doing the same for notmuch-mutt after someone requested notmuch for epel (which triggered the current request). It's way too easy to miss FTIs: You do a scratch build, hope for tests to kick in, but the package never installs properly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241969 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202241969%23c8 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Upgrades of Sundials and PETSc
Just a heads-up that whichever process you have been using to determine
the list of affected dependent packages has been missing getdp; see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245240 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189695. I just rebuilt
getdp in Rawhide, so there’s nothing to do right now.
For next time, this seems to work for me:
for p in petsc{,64,-openmpi,-mpich} libpetsc.so; do repoquery -q
--repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires "$p"; done | sort -u
Well, it doesn’t work in Rawhide right now, because the
rebuilt getdp-3.5.0-10.fc40.x86_64 hasn’t been part of a compose yet,
and getdp-3.5.0-9.fc40.x86_64 still requires libpetsc.so.3.19()(64bit),
which petsc-0:3.20.0-1.fc40.x86_64 doesn’t provide. But at any other
time, that command would reveal getdp as a package that needs rebuilding.
Thanks,
Ben Beasley (FAS music)
On 10/7/23 06:50, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
Hi all.
In 1 week, i will upgrade Sundials and PETSc to their related newer
versions:
PETSc-3.20.0
https://petsc.org/release/changes/320/
sundials-6.6.1
https://github.com/LLNL/sundials/releases
Following packages will be rebuilt:
bout++
freefem++
octave
cantera
dolfin
Regards.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2023-10-20 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: > No agenda set for today, but I'll hold an Open Floor meeting if anyone has any topics. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Self Introduction: Nils Koenig
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 06:10:41PM +0200, Nils Koenig wrote: > Hi @all, > > a quick hello from my side as I would like to join the Fedora Package > Maintainers by taking over responsibility for the vhostmd package. > > I've created a fork and added my change: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/nilskoenig/rpms/vhostmd/c/ > 697e947272969f56f3f892a93e7d37c0babe6d5a?branch=rawhide > > But it seems I can't create a PR from there. Anyhow - I would like to take > over > maintainer ship from Richard Jones regarding this package. > How is that possible? You'll need to get a sponsor, and generally read & follow the steps described here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/ Rich. > Another question, is it possible to fast-forward personal forks? > Or delete/recreate forks? > > Thank you, > Nils > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests. http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2245229] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20231020.001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245229 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202 ||31020.001-1.fc40 Last Closed||2023-10-20 10:46:11 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-d4a8dec1b0 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245229 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202245229%23c2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2245229] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20231020.001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245229 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-d4a8dec1b0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-d4a8dec1b0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245229 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202245229%23c1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244960] perl-Devel-NYTProf-6.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244960 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version||perl-Devel-NYTProf-6.14-1.f ||c40 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Last Closed||2023-10-20 10:16:12 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-e32b91cd02 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244960 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244960%23c2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244960] perl-Devel-NYTProf-6.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244960 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-e32b91cd02 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-e32b91cd02 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244960 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244960%23c1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2245229] New: perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20231020.001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245229 Bug ID: 2245229 Summary: perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20231020.001 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Business-ISBN-Data Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, ka...@ucw.cz, mspa...@redhat.com, p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 20231020.001 Upstream release that is considered latest: 20231020.001 Current version/release in rawhide: 20231013.001-1.fc40 URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/Business-ISBN-Data/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/2674/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Business-ISBN-Data -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245229 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202245229%23c0 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244850] EPEL9 request: perl-XML-Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244850 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-708ed34cc7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-708ed34cc7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244850 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244850%23c1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
