[Bug 2273832] perl-Clipboard-0.29 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273832 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Clipboard-0.29-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116008813 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273832 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202273832%23c2 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2273832] perl-Clipboard-0.29 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273832 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 2025636 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2025636=edit Update to 0.29 (#2273832) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273832 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202273832%23c1 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2273832] New: perl-Clipboard-0.29 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273832 Bug ID: 2273832 Summary: perl-Clipboard-0.29 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Clipboard Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: xav...@bachelot.org Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: c...@fea.st, iarn...@gmail.com, mkre...@gmail.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, xav...@bachelot.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 0.29 Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.29 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.28-10.fc40 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Clipboard/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/14091/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Clipboard -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273832 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202273832%23c0 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2273691] perl-Test-mysqld-1.0030 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273691 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-fbe1426f60 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-fbe1426f60` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-fbe1426f60 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273691 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202273691%23c8 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2273691] perl-Test-mysqld-1.0030 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273691 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2024-acca6511be has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-acca6511be See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273691 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202273691%23c7 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[SPDX] Mass license change ZPLv2.1 to ZPL-2.1
Hi.
I am going to do the mass change of the license from ZPLv2.1 to ZPL-2.1
The proposed diff is in attachment.
Affected packages:
python3-zope-fixers
python-transaction
python-zc-customdoctests
python-zc-lockfile
python-zdaemon
python-zope-component
python-zope-deprecation
python-zope-interface
python-zope-schema
python-zope-sqlalchemy
python-zope-testing
python-nagiosplugin
Unless somebody stop me, I will do this change directly in dist-git after a
week.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
diff -Naur rpm-specs.orig/python-nagiosplugin.spec rpm-specs/python-nagiosplugin.spec
--- rpm-specs.orig/python-nagiosplugin.spec 2024-04-05 04:35:02.0 +0200
+++ rpm-specs/python-nagiosplugin.spec 2024-04-06 21:58:26.520652642 +0200
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
Name: python-%{srcname}
Version:1.3.3
-Release:6%{?dist}
-License:ZPLv2.1
+Release:7%{?dist}
+License:ZPL-2.1
Summary:Library for writing Nagios (Icinga) plugins
URL:https://nagiosplugin.readthedocs.io
@@ -57,6 +57,9 @@
%{python3_sitelib}/nagiosplugin/
%changelog
+* Sat Apr 06 2024 Miroslav Suchý - 1.3.3-7
+- convert license to SPDX
+
* Fri Jan 26 2024 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.3.3-6
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild
diff -Naur rpm-specs.orig/python-transaction.spec rpm-specs/python-transaction.spec
--- rpm-specs.orig/python-transaction.spec 2024-04-05 04:37:19.0 +0200
+++ rpm-specs/python-transaction.spec 2024-04-06 21:58:07.052454899 +0200
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
Name: python-transaction
Version:4.0
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Release:4%{?dist}
Summary:Transaction management for Python
-License:ZPLv2.1
+License:ZPL-2.1
URL:https://pypi.io/project/transaction
Source0:%pypi_source transaction
@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@
%changelog
+* Sat Apr 06 2024 Miroslav Suchý - 4.0-4
+- convert license to SPDX
+
* Fri Jan 26 2024 Fedora Release Engineering - 4.0-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild
diff -Naur rpm-specs.orig/python-zc-customdoctests.spec rpm-specs/python-zc-customdoctests.spec
--- rpm-specs.orig/python-zc-customdoctests.spec 2024-01-27 03:40:15.0 +0100
+++ rpm-specs/python-zc-customdoctests.spec 2024-04-06 21:58:08.795472603 +0200
@@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
Name: python-zc-customdoctests
Version:1.0.1
-Release:36%{?dist}
+Release:37%{?dist}
Summary:Use doctest with other languages
-License:ZPLv2.1
+License:ZPL-2.1
URL:http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zc.customdoctests
Source0:http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/z/%{modname}/%{modname}-%{version}.zip
@@ -72,6 +72,9 @@
%{python3_sitelib}/%{modname}-%{version}-*
%changelog
+* Sat Apr 06 2024 Miroslav Suchý - 1.0.1-37
+- convert license to SPDX
+
* Fri Jan 26 2024 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0.1-36
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild
diff -Naur rpm-specs.orig/python-zc-lockfile.spec rpm-specs/python-zc-lockfile.spec
--- rpm-specs.orig/python-zc-lockfile.spec 2024-04-05 04:37:56.0 +0200
+++ rpm-specs/python-zc-lockfile.spec 2024-04-06 21:58:10.946494452 +0200
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
Name: python-zc-lockfile
Version:3.0.post1
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Release:6%{?dist}
Summary:Basic Inter-Process Locks
-License:ZPLv2.1
+License:ZPL-2.1
URL:https://pypi.io/project/zc.lockfile/
Source0:https://pypi.io/packages/source/z/zc.lockfile/zc.lockfile-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -58,6 +58,9 @@
%dir %{python3_sitelib}/zc/
%changelog
+* Sat Apr 06 2024 Miroslav Suchý - 3.0.post1-6
+- convert license to SPDX
+
* Fri Jan 26 2024 Fedora Release Engineering - 3.0.post1-5
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild
diff -Naur rpm-specs.orig/python-zdaemon.spec rpm-specs/python-zdaemon.spec
--- rpm-specs.orig/python-zdaemon.spec 2024-01-27 03:40:16.0 +0100
+++ rpm-specs/python-zdaemon.spec 2024-04-06 21:58:13.434519723 +0200
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
Name: python-zdaemon
Version:4.2.0
-Release:26%{?dist}
+Release:27%{?dist}
Summary:Python Daemon Process Control Library
-License:ZPLv2.1
+License:ZPL-2.1
URL:https://pypi.io/project/zdaemon/
Source0:https://pypi.io/packages/source/z/zdaemon/zdaemon-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -57,6 +57,9 @@
%changelog
+* Sat Apr 06 2024 Miroslav Suchý - 4.2.0-27
+- convert license to SPDX
+
* Fri Jan 26 2024 Fedora Release Engineering - 4.2.0-26
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild
diff -Naur rpm-specs.orig/python-zope-component.spec rpm-specs/python-zope-component.spec
--- rpm-specs.orig/python-zope-component.spec 2024-04-05
[Bug 2273691] perl-Test-mysqld-1.0030 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273691 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-fbe1426f60 (perl-Test-mysqld-1.0030-1.fc40) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-fbe1426f60 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273691 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202273691%23c6 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [HEADS-UP] dracut update 060 coming to Fedora Rawhide
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 3:23 PM Pavel Valena wrote: > > Hello, > > please $SUBJ, test if you can: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dracut/pull-request/54#comment-190538 > > Any feedback is appreciated. I see that this update was now also submitted to Fedora 40, and will likely ship as a zero-day update. Was this intentional (given $SUBJECT)? Not sure if shipping an update for a critical component like this as a zero-day update is a good idea. Fabio -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Heads-up: python-typer 0.12.1 coming to Rawhide with a significant reorganization
Hey Ben, On Sat, Apr 6, 2024, at 5:05 PM, Ben Beasley wrote: > - osbuild > dist-git: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocrmypdf > upstream: https://github.com/osbuild/osbuild Thank you, I'll move our depends to `typer-slim`. I assume the dist-git URL is a mispaste? Regards, Simon -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2024-04-08)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 19:30 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org on Matrix. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2024-04-08 19:30 UTC' Links to all issues to be discussed can be found at: https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket = Change: GNU Toolchain F41 https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3181 APPROVED (+6, 3, -0) = Followups = None = New business = #3183 Change: PHP No 32-bit https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3183 #3191 Change: Switch to DNF5 https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3191 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual issue. The report of the agenda items can be found at https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to this e-mail, file a new issue at https://pagure.io/fesco, e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting. signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
2024-04-08 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 40 Blocker Review Meeting
# F40 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2024-04-08 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: https://matrix.to/#/#blocker-review:fedoraproject.org?web-instance[element.io]=chat.fedoraproject.org Hi folks! It's time for another blocker review meeting. We have 4 proposed blockers and 5 proposed freeze exceptions for Final. Here is a handy link which should show you the meeting time in your local time: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Fedora+40+Blocker+review+meeting=20240408T16=1440=2 The meeting will be on Matrix. Click the link above to join in a web client - you can authenticate with your FAS account - or use a dedicated client of your choosing. If you have time this weekend, you can take a look at the proposed or accepted blockers before the meeting - the full lists can be found here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ . Remember, you can also now vote on bugs outside of review meetings! If you look at the bug list in the blockerbugs app, you'll see links labeled "Vote!" next to all proposed blockers and freeze exceptions. Those links take you to tickets where you can vote. https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review has instructions on how exactly you do it. We usually go through the tickets shortly before the meeting and apply any clear votes, so the meeting will just cover bugs where there wasn't a clear outcome in the ticket voting yet. **THIS MEANS IF YOU VOTE NOW, THE MEETING WILL BE SHORTER!** We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not fixed. Information on the release criteria for F40 can be found on the wiki [0]. For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, check out these links: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out the SOP on the wiki: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting Have a good weekend and see you tomorrow! [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Introduction and Application for Sponsorship
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 03:07:39PM +, seanmott...@posteo.net wrote: > Hi devel! > > I'm Sean (FAS: seaninspace). I've been working professionally in Linux > Sysadmin/Engineering positions for over a decade now, and would like to help > out more :) > > I've spent most of my Fedora time in QA with the installer, specifically the > XFCE Live ISO. Additionally, I have maintained small/personal packages > outside of the official repositories in the past, and have previously > maintained an RPM mirror with a decent amount of traffic. I'm hoping to > learn more and give back by adopting this package. > > I've submitted a sponsorship ticket here: > https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/643 Welcome Sean! Feel free to ask here or in the #devel:fedoraproject.org matrix channel if you run into any problems/questions. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2273784] New: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.211 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273784 Bug ID: 2273784 Summary: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.211 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, ka...@ucw.cz, mspa...@redhat.com, p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 2.211 Upstream release that is considered latest: 2.211 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.210-1.fc41 URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/Compress-Raw-Bzip2/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/2711/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273784 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202273784%23c0 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2273785] New: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.211 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273785 Bug ID: 2273785 Summary: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.211 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, ka...@ucw.cz, mspa...@redhat.com, p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 2.211 Upstream release that is considered latest: 2.211 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.209-1.fc41 URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/Compress-Raw-Zlib/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/2712/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273785 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202273785%23c0 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Heads-up: python-typer 0.12.1 coming to Rawhide with a significant reorganization
In 0.12.1, Typer was significantly reorganized. - `typer-slim` is the library (for `import typer`) - `typer-slim[standard]` adds optional dependencies (currently `rich` and `shellingham`, basically equivalent to the old `typer[all]`) - `typer-cli` is the `typer` command-line tool - `typer` is now basically a metapackage that brings in *all of the above*, and it no longer has an `all` extra Seehttps://typer.tiangolo.com/release-notes/#0121 and https://github.com/tiangolo/typer/discussions/785 for further discussion and details, and https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-typer/pull-request/3 for the proposed update. Unfortunately, this impacts projects that depended on `typer[all]`. Pip will warn about this and proceed, ``` WARNING: typer 0.12.1 does not provide the extra 'all' ``` but the RPM builds would fail hard when asked to resolve a (now) nonexistent extra. As such, I’m treating this as an incompatible update, even though the actual API appears to remain backwards-compatible. There are three dependent packages that *need* to be changed as part of the update. For each, I’ve prepared a dist-git PR and (where I thought it made sense) an upstream PR. - ocrmypdf dist-git:https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocrmypdf upstream:https://github.com/ocrmypdf/OCRmyPDF dist-git PR:https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocrmypdf/pull-request/4 upstream PR:https://github.com/ocrmypdf/OCRmyPDF/pull/1287 - pgadmin4 dist-git:https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pgadmin4 upstream:https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4 dist-git PR::https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pgadmin4/pull-request/7 - python-openneuro dist-git:https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-openneuro upstream:https://github.com/hoechenberger/openneuro-py downstream PR:https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-openneuro/pull-request/1 upstream PR:https://github.com/hoechenberger/openneuro-py/pull/155 The following requires `typer` but not `typer[all]`, so it isn’t required to do anything; however, a change to `typer-slim` would keep the package from starting to pull in the command-line tool. Since nothing breaks, I’m offering that suggestion only via this email and will not be opening PR’s. - osbuild dist-git:https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocrmypdf upstream:https://github.com/osbuild/osbuild If you are a maintainer of one of the above packages, you should have received a copy of this email by CC. I plan to update python-typer in about one week, no earlier than 2024-04-13. At that point, if there has been no feedback, I will use python-packagers-sig membership and/or provenpackager privilege to merge the PR’s for pgadmin4 and python-openneuro, and for ocrmypdf if and only if the maintainer reviews my PR to fix the pre-existing FTBFS first. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2273691] perl-Test-mysqld-1.0030 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273691 --- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Test-mysqld-1.0030-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=115979926 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273691 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202273691%23c5 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2273691] perl-Test-mysqld-1.0030 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273691 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 2025580 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2025580=edit Update to 1.0030 (#2273691) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273691 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202273691%23c4 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2273691] perl-Test-mysqld-1.0030 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273691 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Test-mysqld-1.0020 is |perl-Test-mysqld-1.0030 is |available |available --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Releases retrieved: 1.0030 Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.0030 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.0013-13.fc40 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-mysqld/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/8094/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-mysqld -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273691 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202273691%23c3 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2273778] New: perl-IO-Compress-2.211 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273778 Bug ID: 2273778 Summary: perl-IO-Compress-2.211 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-IO-Compress Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com, mspa...@redhat.com, p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 2.211 Upstream release that is considered latest: 2.211 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.208-1.fc41 URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/IO-Compress/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/2990/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-Compress -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273778 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202273778%23c0 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora 40 compose report: 20240406.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-40-20240405.n.0 NEW: Fedora-40-20240406.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 20 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 38 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.37 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 1.17 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 810.01 KiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Kinoite ociarchive ppc64le Path: Kinoite/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Kinoite-40.20240406.n.0.ociarchive Image: i3 live aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-i3-Live-aarch64-40-20240406.n.0.iso Image: Silverblue ociarchive ppc64le Path: Silverblue/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Silverblue-40.20240406.n.0.ociarchive = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Workstation live aarch64 Path: Workstation/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-aarch64-40-20240405.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: rust-ashpd0.6-0.6.7-1.fc40 Summary: XDG portals wrapper in Rust using zbus RPMs:rust-ashpd0.6+async-std-devel rust-ashpd0.6+default-devel rust-ashpd0.6+gdk4wayland-devel rust-ashpd0.6+gdk4x11-devel rust-ashpd0.6+gtk4-devel rust-ashpd0.6+gtk4_wayland-devel rust-ashpd0.6+gtk4_x11-devel rust-ashpd0.6+libc-devel rust-ashpd0.6+pipewire-devel rust-ashpd0.6+pw-devel rust-ashpd0.6+tokio-devel rust-ashpd0.6+tracing-devel rust-ashpd0.6-devel Size:167.14 KiB Package: rust-async-broadcast0.5-0.5.1-1.fc40 Summary: Async broadcast channels RPMs:rust-async-broadcast0.5+default-devel rust-async-broadcast0.5-devel Size:31.43 KiB Package: rust-async-net-2.0.0-1.fc40 Summary: Async networking primitives for TCP/UDP/Unix communication RPMs:rust-async-net+default-devel rust-async-net-devel Size:30.85 KiB Package: rust-endi-1.1.0-1.fc40 Summary: Simple endian-handling library RPMs:rust-endi+default-devel rust-endi+std-devel rust-endi-devel Size:26.14 KiB Package: rust-event-listener-strategy0.4-0.4.0-1.fc40 Summary: Block or poll on event_listener easily RPMs:rust-event-listener-strategy0.4+default-devel rust-event-listener-strategy0.4+std-devel rust-event-listener-strategy0.4-devel Size:32.88 KiB Package: rust-event-listener4-4.0.3-1.fc40 Summary: Notify async tasks or threads RPMs:rust-event-listener4+default-devel rust-event-listener4+parking-devel rust-event-listener4+portable-atomic-devel rust-event-listener4+portable-atomic-util-devel rust-event-listener4+portable_atomic_crate-devel rust-event-listener4+std-devel rust-event-listener4-devel Size:82.61 KiB Package: rust-jpegxl-rs-0.8.3-1.fc40 Summary: Safe Rust wrapper for JPEG XL reference implementation RPMs:rust-jpegxl-rs+bench-devel rust-jpegxl-rs+default-devel rust-jpegxl-rs+docs-devel rust-jpegxl-rs+image-devel rust-jpegxl-rs+threads-devel rust-jpegxl-rs-devel Size:79.95 KiB Package: rust-jpegxl-sys-0.8.2-1.fc40 Summary: Rust wrapper for JPEG XL reference implementation RPMs:rust-jpegxl-sys+default-devel rust-jpegxl-sys+docs-devel rust-jpegxl-sys+threads-devel rust-jpegxl-sys-devel Size:50.77 KiB Package: rust-libseccomp-0.3.0-1.fc40 Summary: Rust Language Bindings for the libseccomp Library RPMs:rust-libseccomp+cfg-if-devel rust-libseccomp+const-syscall-devel rust-libseccomp+default-devel rust-libseccomp-devel Size:79.76 KiB Package: rust-libspa-sys0.7-0.7.2-1.fc40 Summary: Rust FFI bindings for libspa RPMs:rust-libspa-sys0.7+default-devel rust-libspa-sys0.7-devel Size:33.18 KiB Package: rust-libspa0.7-0.7.2-1.fc40 Summary: Rust bindings for libspa RPMs:rust-libspa0.7+default-devel rust-libspa0.7+v0_3_33-devel rust-libspa0.7+v0_3_75-devel rust-libspa0.7-devel Size:83.13 KiB Package: rust-pipewire-sys0.7-0.7.2-1.fc40 Summary: Rust FFI bindings for PipeWire RPMs:rust-pipewire-sys0.7+default-devel rust-pipewire-sys0.7-devel Size:18.41 KiB Package: rust-pipewire0.7-0.7.2-1.fc40 Summary: Rust bindings for PipeWire RPMs:rust-pipewire0.7+default-devel rust-pipewire0.7+v0_3_32-devel rust-pipewire0.7+v0_3_33-devel rust-pipewire0.7+v0_3_34-devel rust-pipewire0.7+v0_3_39-devel rust-pipewire0.7+v0_3_40-devel rust-pipewire0.7+v0_3_41-devel rust-pipewire0.7+v0_3_43-devel rust-pipewire0.7+v0_3_44-devel rust-pipewire0.7+v0_3_45-devel rust-pipewire0.7+v0_3_53-devel rust-pipewire0.7+v0_3_57-devel rust-pipewire0.7+v0_3_64-devel rust-pipewire0.7+v0_3_65-devel rust-pipewire0.7+v0_3_77-devel rust-pipewire0.7-devel Size:158.86 KiB Package: rust-rctree0.5-0.5.0-1.fc40 Summary: 'DOM-like' tree implemented using reference counting RPMs:rust-rctree0.5+default-devel rust-rctree0.5-devel Size:22.59 KiB Package: rust-zbus3-3.15.2-1.fc40 Summary: API for D-Bus communication RPMs:rust-zbus3+async-executor-devel rust-zbus3+async-fs-devel rust-zbus3+async-io-devel rust-zbus3+async-lock-devel rust-zbus3+async-task-devel rust-zbus3+blocking-devel rust-zbus3+chrono-devel rust-zbus3+default-devel rust-zbus3
Re: Switching XZ for ZSTD?
On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 13:51:59 +, Arnie T via devel wrote: > The 'basic issue' I see is the "one or two" developers, some that nobody > knows in person, vis-à-vis "many" developers on a big project. > The same sort of a secret agent's infiltration attack on a project would also be possible with contributors knowing themselves "in person". It's not about someone gaining commit access and impatiently running wild within the next week already, but about a much longer period of time. "Another pair of eyes" on any commit as well as on pull requests is always a good idea. Not because you don't trust other contributors but because even basic peer review often helps with spotting bugs and regression. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: %pyproject_buildrequires -r/-x: Attempt to read runtime dependencies from pyproject.toml?
On 27-03-2024 15:48, Karolina Surma wrote: One way to mitigate would be to make the proposed behavior opt-in only, with the possibility to either build wheel with -w option (already existing) or e.g. -p (now-proposed: reading from pyproject.toml) in case backend doesn't have prepare_metadata_for_build_wheel. However, this adds a layer of complexity for packagers and macros maintainers. The questions we'd love your input for: - Should %pyproject_buildrequires try to read dependencies from pyproject.toml first and fall back to calling hooks only if that fails? - Should %pyproject_buildrequires call the hook and try to fall back to reading dependencies from pyproject.toml when the hook is not availbale? - Should this behavior exist but not be the default (explicit flag would be required to opt-in)? - Can you think of a better alternative than the ones described here? I'd be in favor of option two in combination with option three. That is, set a flag explicitly two enable the behavior described in option two, fallback to pyproject.toml if hook is not available. Doing it that way also means the current behavior remains unchanged for package maintainers being unaware similar to the -l flag of %pyproject_save_files. I'm approaching this purely from a packager's point of view. I dislike having the wheel built twice, once for the metadata and again for the package itself. The documentation could point to the build backends, where it makes sense enabling -p, e.g. meson-python. -- Sandro -- ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2273765] New: perl-DateTime-Locale-1.41 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273765 Bug ID: 2273765 Summary: perl-DateTime-Locale-1.41 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DateTime-Locale Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: iarn...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 1.41 Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.41 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.40-3.fc40 URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/DateTime-Locale/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/6477/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DateTime-Locale -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273765 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202273765%23c0 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: "fedpkg local" builds fail for rust packages
On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 12:42 PM Björn Persson wrote: > > Fabio Valentini wrote: > > - Installing rust-*-devel packages on your local system (i.e. outside > > of ephemeral build environments) is not supported. > > - The "rust-*-devel" packages are build system implementation details, > > if you want to say it like that. > > - They are not shipped to users and are not useful for Rust developers. > > - They are *only* intended to be installed in temporary chroots (like > > those set up by mock). > > I don't know enough about Rust to understand how the perfectly normal > usecase of installing libraries as RPM packages has been made so > problematic. I'll just state my strong opinion that packages that > aren't meant for software development should not have "-devel" in their > names. Bascially, this is because of limitations of cargo. It has no support for looking up dependencies in multiple places, only *one* source of dependencies is configurable. By default, dependencies are downloaded from crates.io. We override the "crates.io" source with the directory where Rust crates are packaged for Fedora. Using vendored dependencies works similarly - there, the "crates.io" source is overridden with the directory that contains vendored sources. But there is *no way* to specify *look here, and if it's not there, look elsewhere". If dependencies are not present in the one configured source, cargo just fails. So using packaged Rust crates for development is difficult - since you can't configure cargo to "use dependencies from "/usr/share/cargo/registry" and fall back to downloading from crates.io for things that aren't available". (Side note: The train for using a different suffix than "-devel" has left the station a decade ago. Changing this now is impractical, so the naming bikeshedding is not helping.) Fabio -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F41 Change Proposal: Pytest 8 (self-contained)
On 05-04-2024 23:45, Aoife Moloney wrote: == Summary == Update to a new upstream release of pytest that is not completely compatible with previous releases. Pytest 8 is a major upstream release removing a lot of deprecated functions and introducing breaking changes. I was wondering how this will pan out with the introduction of Python 3.13, which is also planned for F41 and comes with its own set of breaking changes. Some of those affecting tests. The current test builds are run against Python 3.12. Will all Python packages also be tested against Python 3.13 with pytest 8 later on? Does that even make sense? Anyway, it's two major updates affecting the Python ecosystem, which are both aiming at F41. Maybe letting the dust settle on Python 3.13 first and then updating pytest to the next major release will let package maintainers (and upstream) focus more. Just some food for thought. -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: "fedpkg local" builds fail for rust packages
On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 4:45 AM Scott Schmit wrote: > > This perhaps explains why my efforts to use these packages did nothing > but waste my time for days. > > It sounds like you've wasted others' time as well. That's not very > Friendly, and playing nitpicky language lawyer games doesn't change > that, and is also unFriendly. This is about more than just you. Other > people are trying to do things, and you're sitting here saying "too bad, > I don't care, it doesn't work and that's not my problem." If that's not > your intent, that's how it's coming across. > > That's an unacceptable attitude, and I think you need to rethink how > you're approaching this conversation and re-read > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/ from top to bottom. I'm sorry about that. I don't want anybody to feel like they're wasting their time. I really am trying to do my best here, but there are some constraints that I need to work within - both from the upstream cargo side and the RPM packaging reality. I inherited the way we do Rust packaging from my "predecessor" when he stopped contributing to Fedora, I didn't invent things this way. Since I took over maintenance of most Rust packages in Fedora (and the tooling we use to create and maintain them), I tried to push many improvements that make things better for package maintainers. However, we're working with an upstream project that is either indifferent or entirely hostile towards distribution packaging (rust / cargo). Almost all improvements and / or bug fixes that we have asked for in the past years have been either ignored or dismissed as "not our problem". As frustrating as this is, I need to work with what I have, and sometimes that leads to less than ideal outcomes - but please don't blame me for that. > It does not clearly state *anything* you've just now dropped on us. > Also, all RPMs are packages, not all packages are RPMs. For all I know, > "package" could be another way of saying "crate." And just because it's > "intended" to do something doesn't mean "it won't work for anything > else" or "it's not supported if you try to use it for anything else." You are right, this could be stated more clearly. > And I question whether making packages like that is acceptable for > Fedora. The way Rust packages work (and Go packages work very similarly) was signed-off on by FESCo and / or the Packaging Committee, multiple times. If you have a problem with how things work, take things up with those decision bodies. Again, I'm trying to make something that works well here, but I'm trying to do my best given the constraints that we're working within. > The naming convention for packages for the last 25 years as far as I've > ever known has established that "foo-devel" packages provide programming > support files that will allow *me* to build *my own* software using > conventional build tools. > > The way you've described it, they shouldn't be "foo-devel" packages at > all, because they're useless for routine development. Admittedly, the > packaging guidelines don't address this, but I assume this is because > this principle is so obvious that nobody thought it needed to be said. > I mean, it's in the mission statement! The distinction between "-libs" and "-devel" subpackages doesn't really make sense for languages like Rust or Go. There *are* no separately distributed header / development files. The source code *is* the thing that is redistributed for development. I'm not sure if there's a better name for them than "-devel" packages. > It seems to me that these not-"devel" packages should be named > "foo-mock-build-support-for-internal-use-only-and-you-are-on-your-own-if-you-try-to-use-it-for-anything-else". > That would be a whole lot clearer. We can even consider the > ridiculously-long name a feature. Sorry, but this isn't helpful. > You've already said there's no support for using them, so it sounds to > me like they're ineligible for inclusion in RHEL (which involves paid > support), so who cares if it works well in RHEL? You've already said > they don't work well in Fedora either. We support these packages *for building other packages*. The Rust stack is one of the most well-maintained large language stacks in Fedora, with consistently very low numbers of packages that have issues like broken builds or broken dependencies. But RHEL does not include packages for Rust crates *at all* and uses vendored dependencies unconditionally. Which is not an acceptable solution for Fedora for multiple reasons. > > 1. We don't want Rust applications to vendor their dependencies > > I'm trying to write my own software, so what business do you have > telling me what I can do with it? Where's my Freedom? Insert the > Fedora mission statement here (again). ??? I really don't understand what you want to say here. The Fedora rule against bundling packages' dependencies whenever possible has been there for decades (predating Rust as a language). You can do
Re: "fedpkg local" builds fail for rust packages
Fabio Valentini wrote: > - Installing rust-*-devel packages on your local system (i.e. outside > of ephemeral build environments) is not supported. > - The "rust-*-devel" packages are build system implementation details, > if you want to say it like that. > - They are not shipped to users and are not useful for Rust developers. > - They are *only* intended to be installed in temporary chroots (like > those set up by mock). I don't know enough about Rust to understand how the perfectly normal usecase of installing libraries as RPM packages has been made so problematic. I'll just state my strong opinion that packages that aren't meant for software development should not have "-devel" in their names. Björn Persson pgp42QTPCqdJp.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signatur -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F42 Change Proposal: Fedora Plasma Workstation (System-Wide)
Vít Ondruch wrote: > In any case, I prefer to use Gtk apps for Gnome and I assume this is the > case for Gnome users. Similarly I won't be surprised if KDE users prefer > QT apps. I suppose there might be some people who get so emotionally attached to a widget library that they don't want to use programs that use another widget library. Personally I use what works acceptably for my needs regardless of which widget library it's built on. I edit photos in Gimp (the origin of GTK) even though I currently use a desktop built on Qt. I edit text files in Kate (a KDE program) regardless of which desktop I'm using. I used Kmail for many years, even in Gnome 2 at times, until Kmail became so bad that I had to switch to Claws Mail, which happens to use GTK. I even used to endure Gnome Calculator's annoying Gnome-3-ness because it was the best calculator I had until it recently stopped working. I hope I'm not alone in using what works instead of getting hung up on widget libraries. > Mixing the DE and frameworks might not always work without issues. That's not usually a crippling problem in my experience. Each time the desktop I use breaks down, I switch to another. So far I've always been able to find one that could be configured to work acceptably. It's annoying when I have to spend time on that, but fortunately most of the important programs tend to survive. It would be really horrible if I'd have to log in to one desktop for programming and then switch to another for photo editing or word processing. Let's hope the discord never gets that bad. If I can manage to set a sensible theme that exists for both Qt and GTK, then most programs will look similar enough to not distract me from my work – except for those Gnome 3 programs that refuse to obey the theme. (And Firefox which just has to be different, but that has nothing to do with desktops or widget libraries as far as I can see.) Björn Persson pgp3XcsfmYYXs.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signatur -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[SPDX] Mass license change MPLv2.0 to MPL-2.0
Hi.
I am going to do the mass change of the license from MPLv2.0 to MPL-2.0
The proposed diff is in attachment.
Affected packages:
czmq
erlang-exometer_core
git-fame
golang-github-armon-consul-api
golang-github-hashicorp-cleanhttp
golang-github-hashicorp-consul-migrate
golang-github-hashicorp-errwrap
golang-github-hashicorp-logutils
golang-github-hashicorp-raft
golang-github-hashicorp-raft-mdb
golang-github-hashicorp-rootcerts
golang-github-hashicorp-sockaddr
golang-github-mitchellh-cli
golang-github-nrdcg-auroradns
golang-github-nrdcg-namesilo
golang-github-revel-config
golang-github-letsencrypt-pebble
golang-layeh-gopher-luar
libreoffice
libreoffice
libretro-mgba
libxc
python-prefixed
open62541
php-williamdes-mariadb-mysql-kbs
python-cornice
golang-github-nrdcg-porkbun
python-dictdumper
python-enlighten
python-hypothesis
python-mozilla-django-oidc
python-pluginlib
python-pypcapkit
python-txzmq
python-webthing
python-zmq
python-zmq
R-data.table
R-pbdRPC
rubygem-hashicorp-checkpoint
rubygem-vault
golang-github-letsencrypt-challtestsrv
seamonkey
libjwt
vagrant-hostmanager
xcfun
socialscan
golang-github-projectdiscovery-retryablehttp
ini2toml
golang-github-nrdcg-desec
python-fqdn
golang-github-c4milo-unpackit
golang-github-hooklift-assert
golang-github-hashicorp-envparse
Unless somebody stop me, I will do this change directly in dist-git after a
week.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
diff -Naur rpm-specs.orig/czmq.spec rpm-specs/czmq.spec
--- rpm-specs.orig/czmq.spec 2024-04-05 04:03:34.0 +0200
+++ rpm-specs/czmq.spec 2024-04-06 10:08:21.451334277 +0200
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Release:%autorelease
Summary:High-level C binding for 0MQ (ZeroMQ)
-License:MPLv2.0
+License:MPL-2.0
URL:http://czmq.zeromq.org
Source0:https://github.com/zeromq/%{name}/releases/download/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
diff -Naur rpm-specs.orig/erlang-exometer_core.spec rpm-specs/erlang-exometer_core.spec
--- rpm-specs.orig/erlang-exometer_core.spec 2024-01-25 03:06:30.0 +0100
+++ rpm-specs/erlang-exometer_core.spec 2024-04-06 10:08:22.440342841 +0200
@@ -4,10 +4,10 @@
Name: erlang-%{realname}
Version: 1.6.1
-Release: 7%{?dist}
+Release: 8%{?dist}
BuildArch: noarch
Summary: Easy and efficient instrumentation of Erlang code
-License: MPLv2.0
+License: MPL-2.0
URL: https://github.com/%{upstream}/%{realname}
VCS: scm:git:https://github.com/%{upstream}/%{realname}.git
Source0: https://github.com/%{upstream}/%{realname}/archive/%{version}/%{realname}-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -59,6 +59,9 @@
%changelog
+* Sat Apr 6 2024 Miroslav Suchý - 1.6.1-8
+- convert license to SPDX
+
* Wed Jan 24 2024 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.6.1-7
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild
diff -Naur rpm-specs.orig/git-fame.spec rpm-specs/git-fame.spec
--- rpm-specs.orig/git-fame.spec 2024-01-25 03:10:03.0 +0100
+++ rpm-specs/git-fame.spec 2024-04-06 10:08:24.050356784 +0200
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
Name: git-fame
Version:2.0.1
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Release:6%{?dist}
Summary:Pretty-print git repository collaborators sorted by contributions
-License:MPLv2.0
+License:MPL-2.0
URL:https://pypi.python.org/pypi/git-fame
Source0:%{pypi_source}
@@ -48,6 +48,9 @@
%{python3_sitelib}/gitfame/
%changelog
+* Sat Apr 06 2024 Miroslav Suchý - 2.0.1-6
+- convert license to SPDX
+
* Wed Jan 24 2024 Fedora Release Engineering - 2.0.1-5
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild
diff -Naur rpm-specs.orig/golang-github-armon-consul-api.spec rpm-specs/golang-github-armon-consul-api.spec
--- rpm-specs.orig/golang-github-armon-consul-api.spec 2024-01-25 03:11:24.0 +0100
+++ rpm-specs/golang-github-armon-consul-api.spec 2024-04-06 10:08:26.418377291 +0200
@@ -19,11 +19,11 @@
Name: %{goname}
Version:0
-Release:0.14%{?dist}
+Release:0.15%{?dist}
Summary:Golang API client for Consul
# Upstream license specification: MPL-2.0
-License:MPLv2.0
+License:MPL-2.0
URL:%{gourl}
Source0:%{gosource}
@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@
%gopkgfiles
%changelog
+* Sat Apr 06 2024 Miroslav Suchý - 0-0.15
+- convert license to SPDX
+
* Wed Jan 24 2024 Fedora Release Engineering - 0-0.14
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild
diff -Naur rpm-specs.orig/golang-github-c4milo-unpackit.spec rpm-specs/golang-github-c4milo-unpackit.spec
--- rpm-specs.orig/golang-github-c4milo-unpackit.spec 2021-09-21 04:05:31.0 +0200
+++ rpm-specs/golang-github-c4milo-unpackit.spec 2024-04-06 10:10:11.390290696 +0200
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
Summary:Go package to natively decompress and unarchive tar.gz, tar.bzip2, tar.xz, zip and tar files
# Upstream license specification: MPL-2.0
-License:MPLv2.0
