[Bug 2277544] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20240427 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277544

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
   |0240427-1.fc41  |0240427-1.fc41
   |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
   |0240427-1.fc39  |0240427-1.fc39
   ||perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
   ||0240427-1.fc40



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-f3dfe51aac (perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20240427-1.fc40) has been
pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277544

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202277544%23c8
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2278779] perl-Test-Compile-3.3.3 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278779



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-5c33000640 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2024-5c33000640`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-5c33000640

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278779

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202278779%23c5
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2277538] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20240420 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277538

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2024 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2024
   |0420-1.fc41 |0420-1.fc41
   ||perl-Module-CoreList-5.2024
   ||0420-1.fc39



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-2636dca223 (perl-Module-CoreList-5.20240420-1.fc39) has been pushed
to the Fedora 39 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277538

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202277538%23c7
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2277544] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20240427 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277544

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
   |0240427-1.fc41  |0240427-1.fc41
   ||perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
   ||0240427-1.fc39



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-69568978ed (perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20240427-1.fc39) has been
pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277544

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202277544%23c7
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Mass Package Change: Turn deprecated %patchN syntax into %patch -PN

[Omair Majid]

Hi,

Florian Festi  writes:

> If anyone has any objections or would like to exclude a package, please
> let me know.

Could you please exclude the .NET packages (dotnet6.0, dotnet7.0,
dotnet8.0)? dotnet8.0 shouldn't need a fix (and it doesn't appear in your
list). dotnet7.0 is already EOL/orphaned/retired. dotnet6.0 will go
through the same EOL/orphan/retiring process later this year. There's
little point changing it now.

Thanks!

Omair

--
PGP Key: B157A9F0 (http://pgp.mit.edu/)
Fingerprint = 9DB5 2F0B FD3E C239 E108  E7BD DF99 7AF8 B157 A9F0
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Mass Package Change: Turn deprecated %patchN syntax into %patch -PN

[Kevin Kofler via devel]

Neal Gompa wrote:

> On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 8:17 AM Leon Fauster via devel
>  wrote:
>>
>> Am 06.05.24 um 13:56 schrieb Florian Festi:
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > RPM has deprecated the %patchN syntax in favor of %patch -PN where N is
>> > the patch number for a year now. See the RPM documentation for more
>> > information [1]. In current RPM versions, this syntax only emits a
>> > deprecation warning, but support for this syntax has been removed
>> > completely in the upcoming RPM 4.20 release. As it will be added in
>> > Fedora soon [2] it is time to switch over to the new syntax now.
>> >
>> > There are around 1800 packages that still use the old syntax. Later
>> > this week/next week, we will run this script [3] over the affected
>> > packages
>> > [4][5] to update them to the modern patch syntax. For example, the
>> > script will change:
>> >
>> > %patch0 -p1 → %patch -P0 -p1
>> > %patch0005 -p2 → %patch -P0005 -p2
>> >
>>
>>
>> Is this supported by rpm in RHEL8/9 (EPEL8/9 builds)?
>>
> 
> Yes. It's been supported for a very long time.

%patch -P is already documented in the 1997 First Edition of Maximum RPM. 
Here is the link in the 2000 online edition:
https://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/rpm/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-macros.html#S3-RPM-INSIDE-WHICH-PATCH-TAG

Kevin Kofler
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora Elections - Nominations Closing Tomorrow, May 8th!

[Aoife Moloney]

Hello everyone,

A friendly reminder that the Fedora elections nominations for F40 will
close tomorrow, May 8th, so it's not too late to nominate yourself or
someone you know (with their consent) to be a candidate for one of the
following governance bodies of the Fedora Project. Below are the details of
each group, with some examples of what elected members can work on during
their term and a link to the nominations page for each.


   - Fedora Council  - two
   seats
  - Help shape the Fedora strategy & provide guidance on project
  policies
  - Nominations Page
  
  - Fedora Mindshare Committee
    - one seat
  - Help with Outreachy, mentorship & ambassador work
  - Nominations Page
  
  - Fedora Engineering Steering Committee
    (FESCo) - four seats
  - Provide technical leadership and make technical decisions for Fedora
  - Nominations Page
  
  - EPEL Steering Committee
    - four seats
  - Help shape and steer the EPEL overall strategy and provide guidance
  on EPEL policies
  - Nominations Page 


The F40 elections schedule

is available to view for key dates in the cycle, and you can read more
about the Fedora elections on the docs page
. Any
questions, please do reach out.


Thanks!
Aoife

-- 

Aoife Moloney

Fedora Operations Architect

Fedora Project

Matrix: @amoloney:fedora.im

IRC: amoloney
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: PWG+OpenPrinting meetup 2024

[Alexander Ploumistos]

Hello Zdenek,

All this seems very interesting, thank you for the update!


Best regards,
A.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

feedback about adding obsoletes/provides

[Germano Massullo]

A long time ago upstream keepassxc obsoleted upstream keepassx.
I now added obsoletes/provides [1] to the former spec file, following 
Fedora packaging guidelines [2] and I would like to ask for your 
feedback about the correctness of the commit.


Thank you

[1]: 
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/keepassxc/c/6cf8701145d737e893722f2bbe58128d9e79002d?branch=rawhide
[2]: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages

--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

[tdawson]

Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
   EPEL Steering Committee on 2024-05-08 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 UTC
   At fedora-meet...@chat.fedoraproject.org

The meeting will be about:

https://chat.fedoraproject.org/#/room/#meeting:fedoraproject.org

This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.

A general agenda is the following:

#topic aloha

#topic EPEL Issues https://pagure.io/epel/issues
* https://pagure.io/epel/issues?tags=meeting=Open

#topic Old Business (if needed)

#topic General Issues / Open Floor




Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10780/

--
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

PWG+OpenPrinting meetup 2024

[Zdenek Dohnal]

Hi all,

I've joined the mentioned meetup to see what are the changes from the 
last year and proposal what to do in the future.


Highlights:

- CUPS 2.5 on the way, only requirement which is left if OAuth2 support, 
targeting autumn this year,


- one of GSOC 2024 projects is to implement support and distribute 
OpenPrinting projects as OCI containers,


- one of GSOC 2024 projects is to update system-config-printer to work 
with CUPS 3.x series, where libcups is available as beta.



The detailed notes from the talks are attached.

Have a nice day,


Zdenek

--
Zdenek Dohnal
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat, BRQ-TPBC
PWG/OpenPrinting f2f meetup 2024


OpenPrinting Plenary

- 4 out of 6 GSOC passed
- OpenPrinting CUPS - release 2.4.8
- libcups3 - 3.0b2
- CUPS Snap uses latest tag from CUPS upstream
- cups-filters - 2.0.0
- retrofitting printer apps - added release numbering schemes for snaps - 
ps-printer-app (20240209-5 based on foomatic)
  - gs-printer-app - based on gs 10.03.0
  - hplip-printer-app - 3.22.10-8
- cpdb - snap support, GTK support merged, Qt+Chromium before merged, mozilla 
and libreoffice support part for GSOC 2024
  - cpdb-backend-file is discontinued
- desktop integration - print dialogs covered by cpdb support, 
gnome-control-center by GSOC 2023 and GSOC 2024, kde-print-manager,
  system-config-printer GSoC 2024
  - Ubuntu requires all desktops and GUI apps to be ready for CUPS 3.x
- distribution methods upstream - snap + OCI - OCI part of GSoC 2024


GSOC 2023 and 2024
--
- cpdb for firefox, chromium, libreoffice, sandboxced scanner app framework, 
listing of IPP services in gnome-control-center, testing for libcupsfilters, 
libppd, cpdb, libpappl-retrofit - passed
- failed - new functionality for libcupsfilters regarding IPP Everywhere 2.0, 
and native gutenprint printer app

- GSOC 2024:
  - pappl api bridging for scanner apps,
  - CUPS and printer apps for OCI images,m
  - cpdb for libreoffice
  - cpdb for Mozilla
  - upgrade for system-config-printer to CUPS 3.0/driverless printing
  - native gutenprint printer app
  - user interfaces for OAuth2 with imaging devices (printer/scanners)
  - gnome-control-center and CUPS 3.x finalizing
  - convert braille to printer app
  - qpdf -> pdfio replacement in libcupsfilters
  - fuzz testing for C components

- GSOC 2023/2024 - Akarshan Kapoor - pappl scanning support
  - arch:
- client which does escl or can emulate escl for non-escl devices
- framework for writing the client
  - mopria escl endpoints - /eSCL/ScannerCapabilities, /eSCL/ScanJobs,
  - dummy druiver emulation files for emulating non-ESCL models - 
ScannerCapabilities, ScannerStatus, ScannerBufferInfo
  - xml parser - eSCL protocol is basically in XML format, so it needs to be 
parsed
  - created SANE driver from PAPPL retrofit project
  - for GSOC 2024 - struct in PAPPL for scanners, updating dns-sd registration 
to include both printers and scanners


CUPS Plenary

- CUPS 2.4.8/ CUPS 2.5b1 - June/July 2024?, gold release in August/September 
2024
- DONE:
  - wide area DNS-SD lookups and printer profiles (some minor things to be 
done),
  - locale improvements for multiple langs in IPP Everywhere PPDs (based on 
what printer supports - dynamically changes the lang),
  - X509 cert management,
  - backporting some CUPS 3.0 API,
  - job-sheet-col support
  - banner pages on different media types
- TBD:
  - OAuth2/OpenID support

OAuth2/OpenID:
- replacement for kerberos
- many implementations like moauth from Mike
- public cli tool and web interface popup window to be implemented

- libcups 3.0.0 - August/September 2024
- cups-local 3.0.0 - February/March 2025
- cups-sharing 3.0.0 - April/May 2025

Future:
- pappl moved into CUPS servers dependencies
- libcups - requirements for C99, DNS-SD (Avahi, mdnsresponder - RFE for 
systemd-resolved), TLS (gnutls, libressl, openssl), zlib, posix threading,
  removing of old API functions, new API for JSON, HTML form, JWT and X509 API 
  - see MIGRATING.md document at the project
  - installable together with libcups 2.x
- cups-local - discovery, comm with printers, handles authentication, 
authorization, consent and notfi UI
  - runs as user, has domain socket - we can present UI, can log remotely - 
previously problematic with IPP backend
  - job history limited to current login
  - no web interface
  - conversions to PDF/raster
  - printer profiles for non-DNS-SD printers/servers
  - UNIX domain socket and dbus APIs
- cups-sharing:
  - sharing over internet sockets
  - web interface
  - authorization/consent/notif ui
  - Accounting, ACL
  - full enterprise solution with sharing server - user sends job with files 
and then choose files to print on the server, give consent
and gets it printed
  - OAuth JWT inspections


Printer applications

- pappl - CUPS based C framework for printer apps
  - jpeg, png, pwg raster, apple 

[Bug 2188459] CVE-2022-36788 slic3r: Heap-based buffer overflow in the TriangleMesh clone functionality [fedora-all]

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188459



--- Comment #2 from Aoife Moloney  ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 38 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 38 on
2024-05-21.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with
a
'version' of '38'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora Linux version. Note that the version field may be hidden.
Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see it.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora Linux 38 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version
prior to this bug being closed.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188459

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202188459%23c2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2165567] Upgrade perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical to 1.000

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165567



--- Comment #6 from Aoife Moloney  ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 38 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 38 on
2024-05-21.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with
a
'version' of '38'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora Linux version. Note that the version field may be hidden.
Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see it.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora Linux 38 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version
prior to this bug being closed.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165567

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202165567%23c6
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2053941] The Fedora BuildRequires are missing and the license files are listed as %doc

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053941



--- Comment #7 from Aoife Moloney  ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 38 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 38 on
2024-05-21.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with
a
'version' of '38'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora Linux version. Note that the version field may be hidden.
Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see it.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora Linux 38 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version
prior to this bug being closed.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053941

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202053941%23c7
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1716324] Module::Build lists the object files after the linker flags, causing underlinking with -Wl,--as-needed

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1716324



--- Comment #13 from Aoife Moloney  ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 38 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 38 on
2024-05-21.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with
a
'version' of '38'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora Linux version. Note that the version field may be hidden.
Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see it.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora Linux 38 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version
prior to this bug being closed.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1716324

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201716324%23c13
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Ownership request for retired packages libtsm and kmscon

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 08:59:26AM GMT, José Relvas via devel wrote:
> Hey folks,
> 
> `libtsm` was retired because it was orphaned. `kmscon` was retired because it 
> relied on this package.
> 
> I'm currently not in the "packagers" group, but I'm interested in taking 
> ownership of these packages and re-adding them to Fedora if I get sponsored.
> 
> Upstream has ceased development for both `libtsm` and `kmscon`, however, 
> they've been forked and continue to be well maintained:
> 
> -  `libtsm`: https://github.com/Aetf/libtsm
> -  `kmscon`: https://github.com/Aetf/kmscon
> 
> Among other improvements, the build system has been modernized (meson instead 
> of GNU autotools!) and dependencies have been cleaned up. Packaging these 
> forks should be significantly easier compared to the abandoned upstream.
> 
> I've done some testing locally and ran into no major issues, so I believe I'm 
> capable of handling packaging. I've experimented with sending a few PRs to 
> Fedora packages and I feel comfortable with RPM packaging now.
> 
> Please let me know if this is possible :)

I'd suggest submitting them for review. Since they are using a different
upstream and the buildsystem and other things have changed anyhow, a
review is probibly a good idea. Then, as part of that you can find a
sponsor...

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Unresponsive packagers: suanand and vponcova

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 02:15:15PM GMT, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> I think for ex-redhatters it may be more appropriate to make a new bz
> account for their new email address?

Yes. I don't think the system will allow you to change emails for a
@redhat.com account. 

Just making the new account with the same email as your fas account (or
your bugzilla account field setting) should do the trick.

kevin
--
> 
> Jens
> 
> On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 2:11 PM Emmanuel Seyman  wrote:
> 
> > * Sundeep Anand [07/05/2024 05:50] :
> > >
> > > (not sure how to update email at bugzilla.redhat.com)
> >
> > Go to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=account and fill in
> > the 'New email address' field.

> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Fabio Valentini]

On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 1:10 AM Kan-Ru Chen  wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have 3 packages awaiting reviews. I'm happy to exchange.
>
> First is a new IBus input method (code includes bits of C and Python):
>
>   ibus-array: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275556
>
> The other two are trivial rust packages that I need for upcoming libchewing 
> release:
>
>   rust-xflags-macrios: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276537
>   rust-xflags: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276539

Hello!

I see now that you have withdrawn the two Rust package reviews.
Do you no longer need them?

Fabio
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20240507.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240506.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240507.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images:  1
Added packages:  9
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   119
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  1.08 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   2.57 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   8.87 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Workstation live-osbuild x86_64
Path: 
Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-osb-Rawhide-20240507.n.0.x86_64.iso
Image: Workstation live-osbuild aarch64
Path: 
Workstation/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-osb-Rawhide-20240507.n.0.aarch64.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: LXQt live aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-LXQt-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20240506.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: aws-c-cal-0.6.12-2.fc41
Summary: AWS Crypto Abstraction Layer
RPMs:aws-c-cal aws-c-cal-devel aws-c-cal-libs
Size:253.28 KiB

Package: glinf-1.0-1.fc41
Summary: Print information about OpenGL or OpenGLES contexts
RPMs:glinf
Size:99.42 KiB

Package: golang-maunium-mautrix-0.18.1-1.fc41
Summary: A Golang Matrix framework
RPMs:golang-maunium-mautrix-devel
Size:330.84 KiB

Package: gtk4-layer-shell-1.0.2-2.fc41
Summary: Library to create panels and other desktop components for Wayland
RPMs:gtk4-layer-shell gtk4-layer-shell-devel
Size:206.23 KiB

Package: perl-Data-Fake-0.006-1.fc41
Summary: Declaratively generate fake structured data for testing
RPMs:perl-Data-Fake perl-Data-Fake-tests
Size:65.57 KiB

Package: perl-Module-Build-Prereqs-FromCPANfile-0.02-5.fc41
Summary: Construct prereq parameters of Module::Build from cpanfile
RPMs:perl-Module-Build-Prereqs-FromCPANfile
Size:13.17 KiB

Package: rust-chacha20-0.9.1-1.fc41
Summary: ChaCha20 stream cipher
RPMs:rust-chacha20+default-devel rust-chacha20+std-devel 
rust-chacha20+zeroize-devel rust-chacha20-devel
Size:54.01 KiB

Package: rust-curve25519-dalek-derive-0.1.1-1.fc41
Summary: Curve25519-dalek Derives
RPMs:rust-curve25519-dalek-derive+default-devel 
rust-curve25519-dalek-derive-devel
Size:26.94 KiB

Package: rust-dsa-0.6.3-1.fc41
Summary: Pure Rust implementation of the Digital Signature Algorithm
RPMs:rust-dsa+default-devel rust-dsa+std-devel rust-dsa-devel
Size:52.65 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  NetworkManager-openvpn-1:1.11.0-1.fc41
Old package:  NetworkManager-openvpn-1:1.10.2-6.fc40
Summary:  NetworkManager VPN plugin for OpenVPN
RPMs: NetworkManager-openvpn NetworkManager-openvpn-gnome
Size: 1.44 MiB
Size change:  7.56 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon May 06 2024 igo Huguet  - 1:1.11.0-1
  - Update to 1.11.0 release


Package:  ann-1.1.2-28.fc41
Old package:  ann-1.1.2-27.fc40
Summary:  Library for searching Approximate Nearest Neighbors
RPMs: ann ann-devel ann-libs
Size: 1.92 MiB
Size change:  7.68 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon May 06 2024 Dan Hor??k  - 1.1.2-28
  - modernize spec


Package:  aws-c-common-0.9.17-6.fc41
Old package:  aws-c-common-0.9.17-3.fc41
Summary:  Core c99 package for AWS SDK for C
RPMs: aws-c-common aws-c-common-devel aws-c-common-libs
Size: 1.03 MiB
Size change:  248 B
Changelog:
  * Sat May 04 2024 Dominik Wombacher  - 0.9.17-2
  - Packit config update, no package code change

  * Sat May 04 2024 Dominik Wombacher  - 0.9.17-3
  - Run cmake tests during package build
  - Include missing file and directories because of version bump

  * Sat May 04 2024 Dominik Wombacher  - 0.9.17-4
  - ExcludeArch s390x, upstream bug, tests fail

  * Sun May 05 2024 Dominik Wombacher  - 0.9.17-5
  - Packit config update, no package code change

  * Mon May 06 2024 Dominik Wombacher  - 0.9.17-6
  - [PATCH] remove aws_promise, test promise_test_multiple_waiters was flaky


Package:  babel-2.15.0-1.fc41
Old package:  babel-2.14.0-1.fc41
Summary:  Tools for internationalizing Python applications
RPMs: babel babel-doc python3-babel
Size: 6.83 MiB
Size change:  -1.02 MiB
Changelog:
  * Mon May 06 2024 Nils Philippsen  - 2.15.0-1
  - Update to 2.15.0


Package:  btrfsmaintenance-0.5.1-1.fc41
Old package:  btrfsmaintenance-0.5-10.fc40
Summary:  Scripts for btrfs maintenance tasks
RPMs: btrfsmaintenance
Size: 30.93 KiB
Size change:  -2.67 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon May 06 2024 Artem Polishchuk  - 0.5-13
  - license: Convert to SPDX

  * Mon May 06 2024 Artem Polishchuk  - 0.5.1-1
  - chore: Update to 0.5.1


Package:  c4core-0.2.0-1.fc41
Old package:  c4core-0.1.11-20.fc41
Summary:  C++ core utilities
RPMs: c4core c4core-devel
Size: 666.50 KiB
Size change:  30.17 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Apr 25 2024 Benjamin A. Beasley  - 0.2.0-1
  - Update to 0.2.0 (close RHBZ#2277131)


Package:  c4fs-0.0.1^20240426git0ee9c03-1.fc41

Re: RFC: Flaws detected by static analyzers in Fedora 41 Core Critical Path Packages

[Siteshwar Vashisht]

On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 6:26 PM Siteshwar Vashisht 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> This is a follow up on my previous email[1] about OpenScanHub Prototype
> for Fedora.
> Thank you to those who have provided early feedback. Your help is truly
> appreciated!
>
> I am writing this message to get feedback from the community on possibly
> new defects identified by static analyzers in Core Critical Path packages
> that have changed in Fedora 41.
>
> TLDR: This report[2] contains 14188 identified defects. Please review the
> report and provide feedback.
>
> A mass scan was performed this week on the packages that have changed in
> Fedora 41. This report[2] contains all the new defects that have been
> identified in the core packages listed in Critical Path Packages. Please
> review the report and fix or report any defects to upstream that may be
> real bugs. Not all defects reported by OpenScanHub may be actual bugs, so
> please verify reported defects before investing time into fixing or
> reporting them. We hope this is helpful for the packages you maintain and
> for the upstream projects. Questions can be asked on the OpenScanHub
> mailing list[3]. If you want to see the full logs of the scans, they are
> available on the tasks[4] page. User documentation for performing a scan is
> available on the Fedora wiki[5].
>
> If the feedback on this report is positive, there may be a possibility of
> increasing the scope of scans to cover a wider range of packages.
>

I plan to perform another mass scan this month. Please provide any
feedback, if you missed this message earlier.


>
> Please remember this is currently an early production stage for
> OpenScanHub scanning. Constructive feedback is appreciated. Thank you!
>
> [1]
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OMKLJFW4VC242QSA7R4KMGI6IGBT3YLM/
>
> [2] https://svashisht.fedorapeople.org/f41-22-Apr-2024/
>
> [3]
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/openscan...@lists.fedoraproject.org/
>
> [4] https://openscanhub.fedoraproject.org/task/
>
> [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenScanHub
>
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2278779] perl-Test-Compile-3.3.3 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278779



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-5c33000640 (perl-Test-Compile-3.3.3-1.fc40) has been submitted as
an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-5c33000640


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278779

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202278779%23c3
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2278779] perl-Test-Compile-3.3.3 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278779

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
   Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Compile-3.3.3-1.f
   ||c41
Last Closed||2024-05-07 09:50:52



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-d7ad48691e (perl-Test-Compile-3.3.3-1.fc41) has been pushed to the
Fedora 41 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278779

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202278779%23c4
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2278779] perl-Test-Compile-3.3.3 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278779

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-d7ad48691e (perl-Test-Compile-3.3.3-1.fc41) has been submitted as
an update to Fedora 41.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-d7ad48691e


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278779

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202278779%23c2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Ownership request for retired packages libtsm and kmscon

[José Relvas via devel]

Hey folks,

`libtsm` was retired because it was orphaned. `kmscon` was retired because it 
relied on this package.

I'm currently not in the "packagers" group, but I'm interested in taking 
ownership of these packages and re-adding them to Fedora if I get sponsored.

Upstream has ceased development for both `libtsm` and `kmscon`, however, 
they've been forked and continue to be well maintained:

-  `libtsm`: https://github.com/Aetf/libtsm
-  `kmscon`: https://github.com/Aetf/kmscon

Among other improvements, the build system has been modernized (meson instead 
of GNU autotools!) and dependencies have been cleaned up. Packaging these forks 
should be significantly easier compared to the abandoned upstream.

I've done some testing locally and ran into no major issues, so I believe I'm 
capable of handling packaging. I've experimented with sending a few PRs to 
Fedora packages and I feel comfortable with RPM packaging now.

Please let me know if this is possible :)

Thanks,
José Relvas
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review request: python-libgravatar

[Kai A. Hiller]

Hi Sandro,

I’ll take the review. Would be glad if you looked at rust-ulid 
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278199).


Best wishes
Kai

On 07/05/2024 09.04, Sandro Mani wrote:

Hi

pgadmin4 grew a dependency on python-libgravatar, which I've posted 
for review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279493


Happy to review in exchange.

Thanks
Sandro
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/

List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2279153] perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0.025 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279153

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0
   ||.025-1.fc41
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2024-05-07 08:08:53



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-3896d8b3e8 (perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0.025-1.fc41) has been pushed
to the Fedora 41 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279153

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202279153%23c2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2279153] perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0.025 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279153

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-3896d8b3e8 (perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0.025-1.fc41) has been
submitted as an update to Fedora 41.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-3896d8b3e8


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279153

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202279153%23c1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: OCaml flambda optimizations causing a compilation slow down

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 02:07:43AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Richard W. M. Jones:
> 
> > On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 10:16:45AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> * Richard W. M. Jones:
> >> 
> >> > This email is mostly to notify that this is happening.  I'm not sure
> >> > if a single package slowing down compilation means we need to do
> >> > anything here, but if anyone else sees similar symptoms, let us know.
> >> 
> >> What blocks you from profiling it and fixing the performance issue?
> >
> > I did profile it down to a couple of functions in a very dark corner
> > of the compiler (see the thread on cocci devel list that I posted).
> > However in the time available last week I didn't have the time to
> > understand what it was doing or fix it.
> 
> It's computing a transitive closure of a graph, but in a strange way.
> 
> The graph it chokes on has 12,732 vertices and 56,289 edges, and 3,449
> vertices are Top.  So it's really not very large, and the original graph
> is even quite sparse.
> 
> This should fix it:
> 
>   flambda: Improve transitive closure in invariant_params_in_recursion
>   
> 
> Compilation is still not exactly fast, but I think it's bearable (less
> than 40 seconds over here).
> 
> My original comment was a bit of a snark, admittedly.  This one was
> slightly more challenging than usual because it takes a while until
> invariant_params_in_recursion is reached, so if you hit ^C under GDB to
> early, you won't see where it's really spending its time.  But I'm
> pretty sure profiling with just 10 samples per second would have
> revealed the problematic area just fine.

Thanks! I will keep an eye on the pull request.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines.  Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages.  http://libguestfs.org
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review request: python-libgravatar

[Sandro Mani]

Hi

pgadmin4 grew a dependency on python-libgravatar, which I've posted for 
review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279493


Happy to review in exchange.

Thanks
Sandro
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Unresponsive packagers: suanand and vponcova

[Jens-Ulrik Petersen]

I think for ex-redhatters it may be more appropriate to make a new bz
account for their new email address?

Jens

On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 2:11 PM Emmanuel Seyman  wrote:

> * Sundeep Anand [07/05/2024 05:50] :
> >
> > (not sure how to update email at bugzilla.redhat.com)
>
> Go to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=account and fill in
> the 'New email address' field.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Unresponsive packagers: suanand and vponcova

[Emmanuel Seyman]

* Sundeep Anand [07/05/2024 05:50] :
>
> (not sure how to update email at bugzilla.redhat.com)

Go to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=account and fill in
the 'New email address' field.

Emmanuel
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue