Re: Fedora Elections - Voting is now open!

[Christiano Anderson]

Same here, the link is not working.

On 20/05/2024 04:05, JT wrote:
Ran into the same when I voted.  I believe the claim links have been 
broken for a while. Nb discovered at RH Summit, the badge links were 
broken when we tried to claim the Summit badge. Dont know how long 
they've been broken, but I guess that needs to go on the list of things 
to do.


On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 9:18 PM Jonathan Wright via devel 
mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>> 
wrote:


I noticed the same.

On Sun, May 19, 2024, 20:03 Alexander Ploumistos
mailto:alex.ploumis...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hello,

On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 1:06 AM Aoife Moloney
mailto:amolo...@redhat.com>> wrote:
 >
[…]
 >  and dont forget to claim your Fedora badge too!

That last bit doesn't seem to be working. Was the "Claim your I
Voted
badge." link always pointing to the URL of the corresponding badge
without any other parameter?
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

To unsubscribe send an email to
devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/

List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 

Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/

List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 

Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Debugging fun (wrt C modernization change)

[Panu Matilainen]

On 5/17/24 22:42, Owen Taylor wrote:



On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 6:50 AM Panu Matilainen > wrote:



Patch and source numbers start from zero, that goes for automatically
numbered patches too. So there's an off by one in the application, and
the latter %autopatch which is supposed to apply patches >= 2 simply
has
nothing to do, and falls through silently. That's a bug of course in
itself, filed now:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3093


One thing that is quite difficult to do with %autopatch/%autosetup is 
conditionally applied patches, since I've always understood it to be bad 
practice to conditionalize the Patch: lines


The evolution-data-server spec file currently has:


# 0-99: General patches

# 100-199: Flatpak-specific patches
# 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution-data-server/-/merge_requests/144 

Patch100: Make-DBUS_SERVICES_PREFIX-runtime-configurable.patch

[...]

%prep
%autosetup -p1 -S gendiff -N

# General patches
%autopatch -p1 -m 0 -M 99

# Flatpak-specific patches
%if 0%{?flatpak}
%autopatch -p1 -m 100 -M 199
%endif


which will warn if you add a warning about empty %autopatch. Not sure if 
there's a better way of handling that.


Yeah I know. We need a higher level way to handle conditional patches.
Just filed an RFE to look into it: 
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3110


- Panu -
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora Elections - Voting is now open!

[JT]

Ran into the same when I voted.  I believe the claim links have been broken
for a while. Nb discovered at RH Summit, the badge links were broken when
we tried to claim the Summit badge. Dont know how long they've been broken,
but I guess that needs to go on the list of things to do.

On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 9:18 PM Jonathan Wright via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> I noticed the same.
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2024, 20:03 Alexander Ploumistos <
> alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 1:06 AM Aoife Moloney 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> […]
>> >  and dont forget to claim your Fedora badge too!
>>
>> That last bit doesn't seem to be working. Was the "Claim your I Voted
>> badge." link always pointing to the URL of the corresponding badge
>> without any other parameter?
>> --
>> ___
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam, report it:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>>
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora Elections - Voting is now open!

[Jonathan Wright via devel]

I noticed the same.

On Sun, May 19, 2024, 20:03 Alexander Ploumistos 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 1:06 AM Aoife Moloney  wrote:
> >
> […]
> >  and dont forget to claim your Fedora badge too!
>
> That last bit doesn't seem to be working. Was the "Claim your I Voted
> badge." link always pointing to the URL of the corresponding badge
> without any other parameter?
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora Elections - Voting is now open!

[Alexander Ploumistos]

Hello,

On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 1:06 AM Aoife Moloney  wrote:
>
[…]
>  and dont forget to claim your Fedora badge too!

That last bit doesn't seem to be working. Was the "Claim your I Voted
badge." link always pointing to the URL of the corresponding badge
without any other parameter?
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora Elections - Voting is now open!

[Aoife Moloney]

Hi all,

The F40 elections have now officially opened after a little delay. You can
find all of the candidate details in the Elections blog post[1]. We have
open positions in Fedora Council, EPEL Steering Committee, Mindshare and
Fedora Engineering Steering Committee (FESCo) and the voting period will
close on Thursday 30th May @ 23:59:59 UTC sharp so please do take some time
to read the wonderful candidate interviews we have received for the various
open positions, cast your vote and dont forget to claim your Fedora badge
too!


[1] https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/elections-voting-is-now-open/

-- 

Aoife Moloney

Fedora Operations Architect

Fedora Project

Matrix: @amoloney:fedora.im

IRC: amoloney
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Socket state: Output of lsfd

[Sergio Belkin]

Hi, I've found that if I run something like :

ping -4 127.0.0.1
ping6 ::1



and then open another terminal and run using pid of those processes:

sudo lsfd  -i -p  148253,148121  -o +FD,SOCK.STATE
COMMANDPID   USER ASSOC  XMODE   TYPE SOURCE MNTID   INODE NAME
   FD SOCK.STATE
ping148121 sergio 3 rw   PING sockfs 9 1503460 state=close
id=30 laddr=0.0.0.0  3  close
ping6   148253 sergio 3 rw PINGv6 sockfs 9 1501004 state=close
id=31 laddr=::   3  close

I wonder if the "state=close" is the expected behavior or if is an error, I
even run that command with watch -n 0.1 and always appears as "close".

Thanks in advance
-- 
--
Sergio Belkin
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Inactive packagers removed from the packager group

[Artem Tim]

You need to open ticket here https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/new_issue/

As soon as you get your 'packager' group back i can transfer package to you. 
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Inactive packagers removed from the packager group

[Михаил Миловидов]

> rpms/daggy

Hi all, I'm author and maintainer of this package. The project didn't
have any updates, because the new release was not done and the mass rebuild
was successful.
What should I do to save the package in the repository?

пт, 17 мая 2024 г. в 22:39, blackwell via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>:

> Hi all, I have a PR for xmlcopyeditor.
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xmlcopyeditor/pull-request/3
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870203
>
> Jason Blackwell
> On 5/16/24 19:27, Tim Orling wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 5:02 PM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today, 2024-05-16, we have removed inactive packagers
>> from the packager group.
>>
>> This is in accordance with the FESCo policy on inactive packagers:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_inactive_packagers/
>
>
> I suspect I am not alone in asking “What is the list of inactive packagers
> that this impacted?”
>
> The list of affected packages is helpful; the list of inactive packagers
> would have been extra helpful. I suppose it was earlier in the thread?
>
>
>>
>> If the removed user is 'main admin' for a package, this package
>> will be orphaned. If there are co-maintainers for the package,
>> one of them should take the role of 'main admin',
>> by clicking "✋ Take" on
>> `https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/`".
>>
>> Otherwise any packager may take the package while it's orphaned.
>> After 6 weeks, the package will be retired.
>> After another 8 weeks, a new review is needed to unretire it.
>> see
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_orphan_and_retired_packages/
>> for more details.
>>
>> Note that removed packagers will currently still appear in packager
>> groups on src.fedoraproject.org. We are working on a way to refresh that
>> information.
>>
>> More details available in
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11901
>>
>> Packages that have been orphaned are:
>>
>> flatpaks/ardour5
>> flatpaks/dosbox
>> flatpaks/filezilla
>> flatpaks/gnome-books
>> flatpaks/gnome-calendar
>> flatpaks/gnome-maps
>> flatpaks/gnome-music
>> flatpaks/gnome-photos
>> flatpaks/hydrapaper
>> flatpaks/hydrogen
>> flatpaks/jumpnbump
>> flatpaks/prusa-slicer
>> flatpaks/qtractor
>> flatpaks/supertux
>> flatpaks/xonotic
>> modules/fleet-commander
>> modules/pg-semver
>> rpms/3Depict
>> rpms/ansible-collection-community-rabbitmq
>> rpms/apache-commons-net
>> rpms/balsa
>> rpms/BitchX
>> rpms/bolt
>> rpms/brightnessctl
>> rpms/cgdb
>> rpms/collectd
>> rpms/connect-proxy
>> rpms/container-exception-logger
>> rpms/cutecw
>> rpms/daggy
>> rpms/dia-gnomeDIAicons
>> rpms/dmidecode
>> rpms/dnssec-nodes
>> rpms/dnssec-system-tray
>> rpms/dnssec-tools
>> rpms/feedbackd
>> rpms/fleet-commander-admin
>> rpms/fleet-commander-client
>> rpms/freeipa-desktop-profile
>> rpms/gamemode
>> rpms/gedit-latex
>> rpms/gedit-plugins
>> rpms/git-crypt
>> rpms/gitg
>> rpms/givaro
>> rpms/gmrun
>> rpms/gnome-shell-extension-gamemode
>> rpms/gofer
>> rpms/golang-github-client9-gospell
>> rpms/golang-github-mitchellh-ps
>> rpms/golang-github-remeh-sizedwaitgroup
>> rpms/golang-github-xrash-smetrics
>> rpms/gtranslator
>> rpms/gtypist
>> rpms/icewm
>> rpms/inih
>> rpms/kanotf-fonts
>> rpms/koji-osbuild
>> rpms/laf-plugin
>> rpms/levien-museum-fonts
>> rpms/libesmtp
>> rpms/libgit2-glib
>> rpms/libinjection
>> rpms/libitl
>> rpms/libvarlink
>> rpms/linux-system-roles
>> rpms/logserial
>> rpms/lookup
>> rpms/mathgl
>> rpms/mmv
>> rpms/mobile-broadband-provider-info
>> rpms/mysql-mmm
>> rpms/mythes-eo
>> rpms/nik4
>> rpms/nodejs-sprintf
>> rpms/nodejs-strip-json-comments
>> rpms/numactl
>> rpms/nuntius
>> rpms/oc-inject
>> rpms/oomd
>> rpms/osbuild
>> rpms/pcmciautils
>> rpms/pdns-recursor
>> rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES
>> rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum
>> rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA
>> rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10
>> rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random
>> rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA
>> rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509
>> rpms/perl-Flickr-API
>> rpms/perl-Flickr-Upload
>> rpms/perl-Getopt-GUI-Long
>> rpms/perl-Net-DNS-SEC
>> rpms/perl-QWizard
>> rpms/pidgin-guifications
>> rpms/pisg
>> rpms/Pound
>> rpms/ppl
>> rpms/pure-ftpd
>> rpms/python-astor
>> rpms/python-boolean.py
>> rpms/python-ephyviewer
>> rpms/python-fadvise
>> rpms/python-flask-cache
>> rpms/python-git-changelog
>> rpms/python-glue
>> rpms/python-glymur
>> rpms/python-license-expression
>> rpms/python-neatdend
>> rpms/python-pooch
>> rpms/python-pretend
>> rpms/python-pyABF
>> rpms/python-pyzabbix
>> rpms/python-requre
>> rpms/python-rfc3987
>> rpms/python-satyr
>> rpms/python-suds
>> rpms/python-tzlocal
>> rpms/python-varlink
>> rpms/python-waitress
>> rpms/python-whitenoise
>> rpms/python-zbase32
>> rpms/ren
>> rpms/reportd
>> rpms/reuse
>> rpms/rubygem-daemons
>> rpms/rust-xkbcommon
>> rpms/sat4j
>> rpms/satyr
>> rpms/secvarctl
>> rpms/shybrid
>> rpms/spice-html5
>> rpms/springlobby
>> rpms/squeekboard
>> rpms/ssmtp
>> rpms/statsd
>> rpms/sugar

Orphaning buildstream

[Christiano Anderson]

Hi,

I'm orphaning Apache Buildstream ( 
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/buildstream ).


The version 2.x requires new dependencies that are not available on 
Fedora, and I'm not planning to support it.

--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue