Add Gparted into Live's
Dear Fedora Team, I pray to God. Could Fedora live have CD/DVD/USB Gparted by default? Could add Gparted please? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Another bug on OpenSSL
Dear mailing list, Few days was built an patch to solve an another vulnerability into OpenSSL(http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/06/05/new-bug-found-in-widely-used-openssl-encryption/?_php=true_type=blogs_r=0). Some sources talks about that's bug was discovered a long time ago but does not fixed. However, OpenBSD was created a fork called LibreSSL try to solve this issues. Should Fedora to move LibreSSL (http://www.libressl.org/)? Or still use OpenSSL and wait what's bug could be found today, or tomorrow, or few months to go similar Adobe Flash bugs? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
SSD disk over Fedora 20... ?
Dear devel mailing list, I would like to know more information about SSD in Fedora. How I can manage spaces, partition's disk and more? I read about SSD with TRIM support improvements more lyfe cycle durability between other things. I read too that a bad partition scheme would be dangerously decreases a life time of SSD considerably. I am bit worried. More people that buys a laptop with SSD, or buys SSD to install Fedora on It. Grretings! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Tools to mount and promote Fedora on cybers.
Hello buddies, I want get more information about Fedora and tools to help on migration of cybers Windows into Fedora. But I only found old software such as Cyborg (2003), or Fedora KIOS Spin unmaintained (I don't know why was stopped maintain it). Can help me, please? Thank you so much! -- Álvaro Castillo Fedora Project, EMEA ambassador http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
kickstart on LiveUSB creator?
Will be possible to add section to convert your LiveUSB from kickstart file on Fedora live USB Creator tool? Greetings! -- Álvaro Castillo Fedora Project, EMEA ambassador http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: audacity
Please report that to RPMFusion. Not here. As have said before, Fedora does not support mp3 files because is not free and some countries could be prohibed by law. Please contact with RPMfusion people. Greetings! El 28/04/2013 16:28, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com escribió: On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Richard Vickery richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote: For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get this particular build working? I think what you're looking for is the audacity-freeworld add-on package from RPM Fusion, probably best to inquire there, although I think it was on the FTBFS list for F19, but you may be OK for F18. Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Problem in Installing Fedora 17
Hi! Have you tried with # touch /forcefsck ? Do on rescue mode as root Greetings! On Feb 17, 2013 5:38 PM, Rajat Seth rajat...@gmail.com wrote: While installing fedora 17, i am getting the following error again and again unrecoverable error ext4 filesystem check failure on /dev/sda3 file system errors left uncorrected errors like this usually mean there is a problem with the filesystem that will require user interaction to repair. before restarting installation, reboot to rescue mode or another system that allow you to repair the filesystem interactively. restart installation after you have corrected the problems on the filesystem. I had also tried to fix it by running fsck /dev/sda3 after pressing Ctrl-Alt-F2 , but it doesn't work. Iam still getting the same error. Can u please tell me how do i get out of it or how can i fix it ? Please reply as soon as possible. thank you -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Problem in Installing Fedora 17
Sorry... Reboot after, fsck will check your filesystems... On Feb 17, 2013 5:38 PM, Rajat Seth rajat...@gmail.com wrote: While installing fedora 17, i am getting the following error again and again unrecoverable error ext4 filesystem check failure on /dev/sda3 file system errors left uncorrected errors like this usually mean there is a problem with the filesystem that will require user interaction to repair. before restarting installation, reboot to rescue mode or another system that allow you to repair the filesystem interactively. restart installation after you have corrected the problems on the filesystem. I had also tried to fix it by running fsck /dev/sda3 after pressing Ctrl-Alt-F2 , but it doesn't work. Iam still getting the same error. Can u please tell me how do i get out of it or how can i fix it ? Please reply as soon as possible. thank you -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop
I don't think Cinnamon as default desktop. Fedora always was of GNOME by default Desktop. However, I have to choose, I would choose KDE as default desktop. On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote: = Features/Cinnamon as Default Desktop = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Cinnamon_as_Default_Desktop Feature owner(s): Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com This feature proposes that Fedora switch the default desktop interface from Gnome 3 to Cinnamon. Cinnamon provides a desktop interface that is more familiar to Windows and Gnome 2 users than the standard Gnome Shell interface, while being built from Gnome 3 components. == Detailed description == The Gnome 3 interface is substantially different that the traditional desktop interfaces on both Linux and Windows. While it is good that there is research into new user interface concepts, many users prefer to have a traditional interface that they are accustomed to. Unfortunately it is difficult or impossible to assess what fraction of the user base prefers Gnome Shell vs. a more traditional interface. I'm not trying to start (or continue) a flame war here, so I won't state any of my own criticisms of Gnome Shell here, but I will observe that a number of very high profile people in the Linux community, such as Linus Torvalds and Alan Cox, have publicly announce that due to problems with Gnome Shell they are switching to a different desktop and/or Linux distribution. I submit the proposition that it is easier for a user doing a new Fedora install to start with a traditional desktop, and switch to the Gnome Shell if they prefer that, than to start with Gnome Shell and switch to a traditional desktop. The Cinnamon desktop provides a traditional desktop while being based on the latest Gnome and GTK components, so it seems like a better candidate for a default desktop than MATE, which is based on older components. ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Álvaro Castillo Fedora Project, EMEA ambassador http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.comwrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:36:10PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:12:34AM -0800, Zach Brown wrote: So there are a couple of issues with btrfs which I believe absolutely must be fixed before it can become the default I'd agree, though I'd have a different list of pet bugs. But that's a subjective judgement. I'd be the first to admit that I'm pretty risk averse, especially when it comes to losing data and rendering machines unbootable. I think both of us are making a subjective judgement. For myself, I want to believe in btrfs, having championed immutable state/wandering trees, and real databases for many years. BUT I'm deeply unhappy about data corrupting bugs being effectively ignored by upstream for months. That's not good. I see no data corruption bugs that have been reported that are being ignored, link to the email? The invalidate stuff was causing problems (not a btrfs problem, we just got hurt by it the most), and it looks like those were cleared up. I'm working on the only data corruption problem I know of at the moment and it's not super clear its a data corruption problem. The link is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863978 Reported upstream here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/20257 I'd love this to have been fixed upstream somewhere. It is still affecting Fedora, but we can pull in the fix if you can point to it. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Maybe is not good idea. Wait when btrfs launch officialy a least 1 stable version, because nothing 1 release yet. -- Álvaro Castillo Fedora Project, EMEA ambassador http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Any progress in Software Center in Fedora effort?
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Nikos Roussos comzer...@fedoraproject.orgwrote: ** On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 16:49 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 10/08/2012 10:49 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote: Reindl Harald píše v Ne 07. 10. 2012 v 20:02 +0200: Am 07.10.2012 19:55, schrieb drago01: Maybe maybe not. The point is that a fancy software shop would result into this old mother type of user consider to use fedora. A user ultimately don't care about packages but about applications. Other distritors are moving in this direction while we fall behind. We should lead here like we do in other areas. why do we need to lead everywehre for every price? It will be nice if more people uses Fedora, but it not the main target, the greatness of Fedora is not measured but how many user it have, compared to other Linuxes or other os'es. Well without users (and growth) it will become irrelevant and thus it will become harder to achieve anything else. nobody says without users but do we really need every noob as user? Why does some of us imply it's about noobs? Because hardly any of the non-noobs misses this Software Center and because non-noobs know that the term apps is an Apple/Google marketing hype? User experience is important for everyone. Not just noobs. And currently Fedora is certainly not first when it comes on Applications installation user experience. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Advantages: - Do not depend on one or more managers to install something. - More easy admin packages for end-users - In desktops or window managers is more practical to use a software center on another environment managers and many bookstores such as Openbox, wmii, Fluxbox NOTE: openSUSE has got YaST (good!) withouth remove to Ark. Is no excuse to not create it if you follow the upstream projects like GNOME or KDE. Disadvantages - Much time and effort - Search people interested in doing it -- Álvaro Castillo http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Why is not enabled TapButton of touchpad on Fedora by default?
Please do not call idiots anybody this is a community. Respect no a MTV Jersey Shore programm. I do not understand that say Kevin. I talk about No buttons around the touchpad. I speak of the touch pad that allows you to do almost the same as a mouse. A lot users wants enabled by default these touch pad I say. On Sep 26, 2012 4:54 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 11:58 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:44:16 +0200 Kevin Kofler wrote: drago01 wrote: Because some people that can actually use it (i.e I never accidentally click when trying to move the mouse; maybe you just have a crappy touchpad?). On my notebook, touchpad tapping is off of course. I have this problem each time I try to use somebody else's touchpad which has tapping enabled. Many different touchpads, always the same problem. So it's not just a particular crappy touchpad. I wonder if you have problem with touch-screen smart-phones as well, it's essentially the same thing as far as your fingers are concerned. As it never happened to me, it's kind of a mystery how you can accidentally type while moving... Also there's one nice feature on touchpads with tap-to-click, that you can double-tap-and-move to drag (and drop afterward). When lots of people who clearly aren't complete idiots tell you something happens to them, it's probably best just to accept that it does, because arguing that you can't possibly see how it could possibly happen to them is only going to make you look churlish. It happens to Kevin, it happens to me, it happens to lots of other people, which is why the experts in the field have set the default they have. They didn't make it up out of thin air. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Firefox / Thunderbird 17 ESR for Fedora 16/17
Web old version? Firefox launch new releases all time. I do no see a web programmers change your code page all time. While follow w3 standards never mind. So, Firefox ESR has got a lot stability and standby updates each some time. So, developers I guess are feel bad with new Firefox way to new release all time because plugins developers need adapt source code of your plugins for Firefox all time. I think is good idea include ESR on repos. Mageia, ScientificLinux... Has got it. FreeBSD has got both on ports and I think has got on binaries too on your servers. On Sep 23, 2012 9:44 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info wrote: On 23.09.2012 13:10, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 23.09.2012 13:06, schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis: Has anybody considered to package the ESR releases for Fedora or is the general consensus that doesn't make much sense, just leads to confusion and is not worth the trouble. I now and then could need a parallel installed Firefox ESR for a Webinterface that officially only supports ESR releases. I can simply install one in my homedir, but it would be nice to have it yum-installable from the stock Fedora repos (but the problem does not bug me enough to submit a package myself). you can not have BOTH in the repos in a way that the installation doses not conflict and you are missing that switch between both will bring you problems with your profile Something like that, yeah. YOU may be able to work around them with seperated profiles 99 out of 100 users are not and would damage their data All that software that is involved is open-source, hence solutions or workarounds for today's problems could be developed if someone thinks it is worth the trouble. what is this for webinterface only supporting ESR? why in the world should a WEBPAGE not work with a NEWER firefox? It's not so much about work, more about support, because for a software vendor it's risky if you are telling your customers that your software is supporting browsers that are not made yet ;-) Even supporting state of the art browsers is sometimes something software companies fail to achieve. Look here for example: https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Virtualization/3.1-Beta/html-single/Administration_Guide/index.html#Jasper_reports_system_requirements Quoting: The Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Reports tool supports the following browsers: In Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.7 - Firefox 3.6 In Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 - Firefox 3.6 IOW: If you want it or not, you sometimes need older browsers if you want to run a supported configuration (the example is bad because here one even needs a old, EOLed browser and not a Firefox ESR that's still supported; but you get the idea). CU knurd -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Why is not enabled TapButton of touchpad on Fedora by default?
Yest... Need edit files to use something as touchpad :) On Sep 18, 2012 2:11 PM, mike cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:55 PM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote on 09/18/2012 08:09:33: From: Florian Müllner fmuell...@gnome.org To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Date: 09/18/2012 08:10 Subject: Re: Why is not enabled TapButton of touchpad on Fedora by default? Sent by: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Camilo Mesias cam...@mesias.co.uk wrote: I always enable the feature but it is an ongoing annoyance that it is disabled at GDM, is there any way to force it to default to on for the whole system? I have the following in /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d/10-local-settings: [org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/mouse] active=true [org/gnome/settings-daemon/peripherals/touchpad] tap-to-click=true You will need to run dconf update as root for the change to take effect. Regards, Florian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Any ideas on the equivalent for KDM? Why not enable it in xorg itself - from memory you can look for a file like /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-synaptics.conf (or possibly in /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/50-synaptics.conf or similar) Then ensure that you have a section like: Section InputClass Identifier touchpad catchall Driver synaptics MatchIsTouchpad on MatchDevicePath /dev/input/event* Option TapButton1 1 Option TapButton2 2 Option TapButton3 3 Option VertEdgeScroll on EndSection When you boot you should have touchpad buttons available even at the KDM greeter stage for login - (I guess same for GDM though I am a KDE user only) I have been doing this for several years with my laptops -- mike c -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Why is not enabled TapButton of touchpad on Fedora by default?
If you do not like touchpad. Can disable on your laptop with Fn keys. However who can use it need edit somefiles...add code to uses it So. I never occurs that I pushed my finger accidentaly and moved cursor. Lol On Sep 18, 2012 2:16 PM, Álvaro Castillo net...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Yest... Need edit files to use something as touchpad :) On Sep 18, 2012 2:11 PM, mike cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:55 PM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote on 09/18/2012 08:09:33: From: Florian Müllner fmuell...@gnome.org To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Date: 09/18/2012 08:10 Subject: Re: Why is not enabled TapButton of touchpad on Fedora by default? Sent by: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Camilo Mesias cam...@mesias.co.uk wrote: I always enable the feature but it is an ongoing annoyance that it is disabled at GDM, is there any way to force it to default to on for the whole system? I have the following in /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d/10-local-settings: [org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/mouse] active=true [org/gnome/settings-daemon/peripherals/touchpad] tap-to-click=true You will need to run dconf update as root for the change to take effect. Regards, Florian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Any ideas on the equivalent for KDM? Why not enable it in xorg itself - from memory you can look for a file like /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-synaptics.conf (or possibly in /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/50-synaptics.conf or similar) Then ensure that you have a section like: Section InputClass Identifier touchpad catchall Driver synaptics MatchIsTouchpad on MatchDevicePath /dev/input/event* Option TapButton1 1 Option TapButton2 2 Option TapButton3 3 Option VertEdgeScroll on EndSection When you boot you should have touchpad buttons available even at the KDM greeter stage for login - (I guess same for GDM though I am a KDE user only) I have been doing this for several years with my laptops -- mike c -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
What happend with SystemConfigCleanup?
Hi! What happend with SCC? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemConfigCleanup Current status Targeted release: Fedora 18 Last updated: 2009-05-19 Percentage of completion: 25% Is not updated from 2009, have worked only 25% but will be included on F18? How is possible? Álvaro Castillo http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: What happend with SystemConfigCleanup?
Mmm... Maybe devel list will be interested to develop this good tool. Somebody wants develop or start develop these tool or create software (control panel) to admin your system with s-c-*(tools)? On Sep 18, 2012 10:39 PM, Nicola Soranzo nsora...@tiscali.it wrote: Il giorno mar, 18/09/2012 alle 20.11 +0100, Álvaro Castillo ha scritto: What happend with SCC? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemConfigCleanup Current status Targeted release: Fedora 18 Last updated: 2009-05-19 Percentage of completion: 25% Is not updated from 2009, have worked only 25% but will be included on F18? How is possible? You missed Category: FeaturePageIncomplete at the end of the page, i.e. it is a feature being investigated by the Fedora community that have not been Proposed or Accepted for a particular Fedora release. More info at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy Nicola -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Why is not enabled TapButton of touchpad on Fedora by default?
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote: I thought so too. I was wondering what the DE agnostic way of enabling tapping would be though. I use gnome, and the mouse utility does this for me. However, when folks on other DEs, such as XFCE ask me how to do it, I don't quite have an answer. Could someone please outline the correct way of enabling tapping and other options (for instance horizontal scrolling, two finger scrolling..) on various DEs ? Even if each DE has a specific way, please can you post with what it is? I can compile the information on a wiki page to aid users, with relevant links to upstreams if they want to take up changing defaults with them. $ synclient TapButton1=1 is to enable touchpad clic -- Álvaro Castillo http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Why is not enabled TapButton of touchpad on Fedora by default?
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Álvaro Castillo net...@fedoraproject.orgwrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.comwrote: I thought so too. I was wondering what the DE agnostic way of enabling tapping would be though. I use gnome, and the mouse utility does this for me. However, when folks on other DEs, such as XFCE ask me how to do it, I don't quite have an answer. Could someone please outline the correct way of enabling tapping and other options (for instance horizontal scrolling, two finger scrolling..) on various DEs ? Even if each DE has a specific way, please can you post with what it is? I can compile the information on a wiki page to aid users, with relevant links to upstreams if they want to take up changing defaults with them. $ synclient TapButton1=1 is to enable touchpad clic -- Álvaro Castillo http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 Maybe add this on all DE, WM...et LXDE spin by adding these two lines to /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/50-synaptics.conf: Code: Option TapButton1 1 Option RBCornerButton 3 Could problem solved? -- Álvaro Castillo http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora multi-arch
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: These were originally for ambassadors only to use at events. I have no objection to making them more known, however, I think they should be tested and produced in the same way other Fedora images are. In the f17 cycle they were not tested by QA at all, and sadly, the multi-install iso is broken. This led to useless media and everything looking bad. ;( so, if we are going to make them, they should get tested, produced and distributed (including signed checksums) like every other image we produce. IMHO. Yes, please, before release these DVDs, check QA control, DVDs are money that wasn't unused by these error. I am an ambassador affected by a little problem. On vmlinuz and syslinux, has got 0. This 0 both do cannot boot. You need edit GRUB kernel lines and remove 0 to work -- Álvaro Castillo http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Why is not enabled TapButton of touchpad on Fedora by default?
Hello devel list, I want know... Why Fedora doesn't included TapButton support of touchpad by default? I saw AskFedora and FedoraForum.org, and it happened to me too after install or show live CD to people, a lot users request, or asking about How to setup TapButton. It's ok, you can enable it from GNOME control panel, or touchpad tool, or KDE touchpad configuration, but who have installed only LXDE, XFCE... or another Window Manager...? How do? Search solution on Internet? Greetings! -- Álvaro Castillo http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Why is not enabled TapButton of touchpad on Fedora by default?
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.comwrote: It's a function of the desktop, and we go with the upstream desktop defaults, AFAIK. Mmm, sorry, I cannot understand very well. Im spanish and my english is limited, I can not take things for granted. Desktop, you mean, desktops PCs, right? -- Álvaro Castillo http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
