Re: Rust Stack Spring Cleaning - 2024 Edition

[Alessio]

On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 15:26 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> 
> - alciregi (1): rust-backoff
> 

Hello. This is required by a package still under review (waiting for a
reviewer actually).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268499

Thank you,
Alessio

--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Intent to retire python-bluepy

[Alessio]

I'm going to retire python-bluepy from Rawhide.
It was an interesting Python interface to Bluetooth LE on Linux; I was
some interests on it when I had time to tinker with Raspberry and
Micro:bit boards.

Currently there are problems building it with Python 3.12 (actually
there were issues also with 3.10 [1])

The upstream github repository [2] has had no activity for two years,
there are hundreds of open issues, and also the upstream developer
doesn't look very active on github.


[1] https://github.com/IanHarvey/bluepy/issues/489
[2] https://github.com/IanHarvey/bluepy
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Unresponsive maintainer for timeshift

[Alessio]

Hello.

Is someone in contact with *srakitnican*?

I started the n*on-responsive maintainer* process [0], because timeshift 
doesn't work since Fedora Linux 35 was released. In the meanwhile upstream 
released various new versions, and bugs were reported [1].
Someone created a COPR repository with the updated and working package [3], and 
could take the maintenance of such package if they wish.

[0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052093

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1897979

[3] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/oprizal/timeshift-upstream/

Ciao,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Timeshift maintainer

[Alessio]

I would like to ping srakitnican, the Timeshift maintainer (someone is
in touch with them?).

Timeshift is a graphical tool to manage BTRFS snapshots. I don't use it
personally, but I know a bunch of people that rely on it.

Thimeshift coming from the Fedora repository, doesn't work on Fedora
Linux 35, due to a change in lsblk (util-linux). Upstream released a
patch this summer.
Upstream version is 21.09.1, while the version in the Fedora repository
is 20.03
There are various open bugs on Bugzilla related to this package.

Someone has built a COPR repository [1] with the latest upstream
release. In such repository it is stated:
"Here are compiled newest timeshift from Github for temporary update
until timeshift on the main fedora repository get updated by the
package maintener. This version intended to fix timeshift bugs on
Fedora 35 Workstation."


[1] http://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/oprizal/timeshift-upstream/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed from their packages

[Alessio]

On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 15:25 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
> 
> When we rolled out the new AAA solution a few weeks ago, some
> accounts have not
> been migrated:

OT
Out of curiosity: what happens if I register a new account on the new
AAA with one of these usernames?


Ciao,
A.


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Alessio Ciregia]

> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> 
> redir orphan   2 weeks ago

While redir (version 2.2.1) [0] is a stale project (as far as I can see), there 
is a new version maintained on GitHub [1].
"Redir was originally created by Sam Creasey and is now developed and 
maintained at GitHub by Joachim Nilsson."

If we assume that this redir 3.x, maintained by Joachim Nilsson is a 
continuation of redir 2.x created by Sam Creasey, that is we haven't a name 
conflict, I can take care of this package.

[0] https://sammy.net/~sammy/hacks
[1] https://github.com/troglobit/redir

Ciao,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: [retitled] Fedora wiki and code tags

[Alessio]

On Aug 4, 2020 8:31 AM, "John M. Harris Jr"  wrote:
>
> That somebody doesn't like something doesn't mean that they don't respect 
> those who made it. 

Ok. Maybe we are going OT.
But excuse me John: words matter. Saying "it sucks" is not equal to "I don't 
like it".

A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Self Introduction: Stefano Figura (returntrip)

[Alessio]

Hello Stefano. Welcome!

Ciao,
A.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Bodhi: "how to install" is supposed to work?

[Alessio]

On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 10:54 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 02. 06. 20 v 9:32 Alessio napsal(a):
> > In Bodhi there is a dnf command in the "How to install" section, in
> > order to install the package to test. Something like:
> > 
> > sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-
> > 2020-
> > 81a3b3df7d
> > 
> > Is it supposed to work? Because every time I tried it, it didn't
> > work.
> 
> Could you please provide more details about "it didn't work". Reading

It doesn't install anything: "Nothing to do."

But as clarified in this thread, it is a mirror propagation issue. Need
to wait, then it works.


A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Bodhi: "how to install" is supposed to work?

[Alessio]

In Bodhi there is a dnf command in the "How to install" section, in
order to install the package to test. Something like:

sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-
81a3b3df7d

Is it supposed to work? Because every time I tried it, it didn't work.
In addition a package received a negative karma due to that ^_^;

Ciao,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: How to determine maintainer of a package en mass?

[Alessio]

On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 01:34 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> 
> This shows all the packages for which you are "owner" / "main admin":
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/dashboard/projects?acl=main+admin

There is also a way to get the packages for wich another user is the
owner?

Ciao,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: orphaning bleachbit

[Alessio]

On Tue, 2019-12-31 at 10:09 +0300, Silvia Sánchez wrote:
> 
> I'm perfectly fine with Fedora's policy regarding Python2.  When
> upstream updates to 3, I'll be happy to comaintain together with
> Alessio.

For the record, bleachbit 4 supporting python 3 was released a couple
of weeks ago.


Ciao,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: orphaning bleachbit

[Alessio]

On Sun, Dec 22, 2019, 8:59 PM stan via devel 
wrote:

>
> I have never used bleachbit, but I took a look at this program to see if
> it would be a simple matter to convert it to python3.  It won't.
>

As I wrote in another e-mail, upstream is working to port the program to
python3. There is a related branch on github.

Sorry but by mentioning a retired package, and the possibility to package
it again in Fedora once upstream will release a python3 version, it was not
my intention to trigger a discussion about python2 policies and procedures
that, as far as I know, they were pretty clear since a lot of time.

Ciao,
A.

>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: orphaning bleachbit

[Alessio Ciregia]

Hello Lailah, are you still interested in maintaining that?

A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Regarding Adam Miller (maxamillion) packager status

[Alessio]

FYI I took ophcrack.

Ciao,
A.

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 9:48 PM Miro Hrončok  wrote:
>
> On 09. 12. 19 18:38, Adam Miller wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 11:15 AM Miro Hrončok  wrote:
> >>
> >> On 09. 12. 19 18:04, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >>> I had a short email conversation with Adam and he doesn't have time to 
> >>> maintain
> >>> any his packages anymore. I don't know how to tell which packages he's 
> >>> main
> >>> admin on but he on 391 packages overall.
> >>>
> >>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/maxamillion/projects
> >>
> >>
> >> This is the full list of component's where Adam is the main admin:
> >>
> >> https://src.fedoraproject.org//api/0/projects?owner=maxamillion_page=100=true=false
> >>
> >>> He did point out a problem and I'm not sure what the solution is. Without 
> >>> old
> >>> pkgdb, how does one mass remove themselves from packages?
> >>
> >> Releng has a script to mass orphan packages from a list. The list can be
> >> obtained from the above. Adam, shall I run it?
> >>
> >
> > As much as I hate to say it. Yes please, have them run it.
> >
> > I hope to return as a contributor in a meaningful way one day.
> >
> > <3 Fedora
>
> Done:
>
> Giving container/cockpit to orphan
> Giving container/kubernetes to orphan
> Giving rpms/MochiKit to orphan
> Giving rpms/apachetop to orphan
> Giving rpms/binclock to orphan
> Giving rpms/http_ping to orphan
> Giving rpms/ifstatus to orphan
> Giving rpms/ike-scan to orphan
> Giving rpms/koji-containerbuild to orphan
> Giving rpms/mcollective to orphan
> Giving rpms/mcollective-qpid-plugin to orphan
> Giving rpms/mod_auth_cas to orphan
> Giving rpms/nbtscan to orphan
> Giving rpms/ninvaders to orphan
> Giving rpms/ophcrack to orphan
> Giving rpms/pscan to orphan
> Giving rpms/python-dockerpty to orphan
> Giving rpms/python-enum to orphan
> Giving rpms/python-fedmsg-rabbitmq-serializer to orphan
> Giving rpms/python-texttable to orphan
> Giving rpms/python-virtkey to orphan
> Giving rpms/reg to orphan
> Giving rpms/shed to orphan
> Giving rpms/sslstrip to orphan
> Giving rpms/tcptraceroute to orphan
> Giving rpms/tmuxinator to orphan
> Giving rpms/txt2man to orphan
> Giving rpms/vttest to orphan
>
> --
> Miro Hrončok
> --
> Phone: +420777974800
> IRC: mhroncok
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Regarding Adam Miller (maxamillion) packager status

[Alessio]

I would like to take http_ping, since it is a simple spec file :-) and
I am still learning packaging.

On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 7:31 AM Clement Verna  wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019, 21:49 Miro Hrončok  wrote:
>>
>> On 09. 12. 19 18:38, Adam Miller wrote:
>> > On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 11:15 AM Miro Hrončok  wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 09. 12. 19 18:04, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> >>> I had a short email conversation with Adam and he doesn't have time to 
>> >>> maintain
>> >>> any his packages anymore. I don't know how to tell which packages he's 
>> >>> main
>> >>> admin on but he on 391 packages overall.
>> >>>
>> >>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/maxamillion/projects
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> This is the full list of component's where Adam is the main admin:
>> >>
>> >> https://src.fedoraproject.org//api/0/projects?owner=maxamillion_page=100=true=false
>> >>
>> >>> He did point out a problem and I'm not sure what the solution is. 
>> >>> Without old
>> >>> pkgdb, how does one mass remove themselves from packages?
>> >>
>> >> Releng has a script to mass orphan packages from a list. The list can be
>> >> obtained from the above. Adam, shall I run it?
>> >>
>> >
>> > As much as I hate to say it. Yes please, have them run it.
>> >
>> > I hope to return as a contributor in a meaningful way one day.
>> >
>> > <3 Fedora
>>
>> Done:
>>
>> Giving container/cockpit to orphan
>> Giving container/kubernetes to orphan
>> Giving rpms/MochiKit to orphan
>> Giving rpms/apachetop to orphan
>> Giving rpms/binclock to orphan
>> Giving rpms/http_ping to orphan
>> Giving rpms/ifstatus to orphan
>> Giving rpms/ike-scan to orphan
>> Giving rpms/koji-containerbuild to orphan
>> Giving rpms/mcollective to orphan
>> Giving rpms/mcollective-qpid-plugin to orphan
>> Giving rpms/mod_auth_cas to orphan
>> Giving rpms/nbtscan to orphan
>> Giving rpms/ninvaders to orphan
>> Giving rpms/ophcrack to orphan
>> Giving rpms/pscan to orphan
>> Giving rpms/python-dockerpty to orphan
>> Giving rpms/python-enum to orphan
>> Giving rpms/python-fedmsg-rabbitmq-serializer to orphan
>> Giving rpms/python-texttable to orphan
>> Giving rpms/python-virtkey to orphan
>> Giving rpms/reg to orphan
>> Giving rpms/shed to orphan
>> Giving rpms/sslstrip to orphan
>> Giving rpms/tcptraceroute to orphan
>> Giving rpms/tmuxinator to orphan
>> Giving rpms/txt2man to orphan
>> Giving rpms/vttest to orphan
>
>
> I took koji-containerbuild and reg since they are used by the infra.
>
>>
>> --
>> Miro Hrončok
>> --
>> Phone: +420777974800
>> IRC: mhroncok
>> ___
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives: 
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: A new workflow for newcomers

[Alessio]

On Wed, Oct 23, 2019, 7:01 PM Matthew Miller 
wrote:

>
> > [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Welcome
>
> can we get this onto the docs site?
>

Sure. In which section does it need to be? Maybe here?
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/join/

A.

>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Way to visualize where Fedora contributors are around the world?

[Alessio]

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019, 8:48 PM Richard Shaw  wrote:

>
> That got me thinking it would be pretty neat if a map could be
> automagically creating showing where everyone is. Wouldn't need exact
> addresses for privacy reasons but something that gets you close like a zip
> code (or equivalent).
>
> Thoughts?
>

Maybe you could play with this tool and adapt it to your needs:
https://pagure.io/fedora-commops/geofp

Ciao
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

No More i686 Kernels, No i686 Repositories

[Alessio]

I read the change set for F31 [1] and I read the threads in this list,
but now I'm a bit lost and a bit confused. So I don't want to reply to
the already existent thread, because I would like some clarifications.
I don't want to open a new endless thread. :-)

Could someone explain in simple words what that means for a Fedora
user? Talking about i686 architecture, what a user should expect in
F31?

- No more i686 bootable images (this is pretty clear)
- Can a user running a 32 bit F30 upgrade to F31?
- Can a user install i686 version of a package?
- ...

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/31/ChangeSet


Thanks,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

[Alessio]

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019, 5:16 PM Dario Lesca  wrote:

>
> After few minutes almost everything work well, except for a thing ...
> all windows PC cannot access to others windows PC.
>

Wait. I'm not an expert. Said that, are we sure that the cause is krb MIT?
Also on the samba ml it seems a supposition.
Windows PCs are all running windows7?
The same happens with windows 10?

And all these deprecated entries?

krb5kdc[6764](info): AS_REQ (6 etypes {aes256-cts-hmac-sha1-96(18),
aes128-cts-hmac-sha1-96(17), DEPRECATED:arcfour-hmac(23),
DEPRECATED:arcfour-hmac-exp(24), (-135), DEPRECATED:des-cbc-md5(3)})

>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Google Chrome Flash doesn't seem to work in F30

[Alessio]

On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 14:39 +0200, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've noticed that Flash doesn't seem to work in F30 in the upstream
> Google Chrome.  It works in F29.  As a test, I installed an F29 and

It seems to me that, even if the default option for Flash is "Always
ask", when you go to a site where Flash is needed, no answer appears.
So I need to click on the (i) or the padlock near the address bar,
select "Site settings" and allow Flash explicitly.
At this point it works.

Someone can confirm?

Ciao,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Translating the banner text

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Wed, Oct 31, 2018, 6:55 PM  wrote:

>
> Just want to add: the banners don't really look great, and it'd be nice
> to see them removed from the installer (or replaced). First there's the
>

+1
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Testing / feedback request: DNF 3 crashes

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 9:26 PM Adam Williamson
 wrote:
> Can anyone who is still struggling with DNF crashes on *basic*
> operations on F29 or Rawhide please reply, and provide a few details on
> what you're seeing and any workarounds or fixes you've found?


FWIW, I never hit such problem.
The only way to get in troubles consists in hammering the history.sqlite file:
echo 1 > /var/lib/dnf/history.sqlite

Now almost all dnf operations fails (except dnf search):

dnf update
...
RuntimeError: C++ std::exception: Exec failed: file is not a database

And in the journal:
Sep 14 10:20:11 hostname python3[8830]: detected unhandled Python
exception in '/usr/bin/dnf'
Sep 14 10:20:11 hostname abrt-notification[8856]: Process 8830 (dnf)
of user 0 encountered an uncaught RuntimeError exception
-- Subject: ABRT has detected an uncaught RuntimeError exception in dnf
...

Deleting the "corrupted" history.sqlite, it restores the normal situation.

Ciao,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Starting a Container SIG

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018, 9:13 PM Eduard Lucena  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm not familiar with the container technology, but I will love to learn
> it. I would like to help with this SIG.
>

Well, I'm not an expert at all, but like Eduard I would like to learn
something related to containers.

Ciao,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3GZB6O4HQNIM7VGIPOR54HIRKT7HZ7PP/

Re: Red Hat bugzilla upgrade coming -- test now!

[Alessio Ciregia]

2018-06-25 12:15 GMT+02:00 Vít Ondruch :
>
> From the notification on the top of the BZ page:

Whoops. :-)
Thank you.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YRTDI7QGLYSWOLEKNWEHIOUJAGRVGTEK/

Re: Red Hat bugzilla upgrade coming -- test now!

[Alessio Ciregia]

2018-06-21 17:26 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller :
> Red Hat is planning on upgrading Bugzilla to BZ5 in September. There's
> a test instance running now at http://bugzilla5.redhat.com/
>
> Since Fedora is a major user and stakeholder here, it'd be helpful if
> we make sure everything works for us.  If you find any bugs, report at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=5.0

Hello.
The Test Instance is supposed to work in parallel with the production one?
I mean, bugs reported here are "mirrored" in the production site?

Thanks.
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DZLYVERC5UBZD5PJQMUHGXKT6TLAEGSO/

Re: Problem: package fwupdate-libs-10-6.fc28.x86_64 requires shim

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Sat, Mar 10, 2018, 19:58 Steve Dickson  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I've getting the following error when I try to update from f27 to f28:
>
> 
> Any ideas?
>

Same issue here:

<
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/t...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/EM64662HQ6UKKU7NECZO2C2LFD2Z6EUP/
>

Ciao,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Oct 13, 2017 19:00, "Simo Sorce"  wrote:


We are Fedora and we are First, even when it is painful IMHO.


I count for little in the Fedora community, but this is exactly my opinion
in this discussion.

A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org