Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F33 to F34
On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 09:49, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 34 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run: > ># Run this only if you use default Fedora modules ># next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled > again >sudo dnf module reset '*' > >sudo dnf --releasever=34 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f34 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. You may also run `dnf > upgrade` before running this command. > > If you have have rdma-core.i686 installed you have to pass > `--allowerasing`. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919864 > > > If you get this prompt: > >... >Total download size: XXX M >Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please > report it against the appropriate package. Or > against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > Fedora 34. Please check existing reports against > fedora-obsolete-packages first: >https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" reports: >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=F34FailsToInstall > > Thank you > > P.S. sent from workstation successfully upgraded to F34 :) > > All worked as expected /described. Linux Y03222 5.11.0-156.fc34.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Feb 17 08:31:59 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Cheers all round :beers: ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fedora 34 Change: Route all Audio to PipeWire (System-Wide Change)
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 16:28, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DefaultPipeWire > > == Summary == > This change proposal is to route all audio from PulseAudio and JACK to > the PipeWire Audio > daemon by default. > > == Owner == > * Name: [[User:Wtaymans| Wim Taymans]] > * Email: wim.taym...@gmail.com > > > == Detailed Description == > This is great news. Whenever it lands. Fantastic. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Ditch RPM in favor of DPKG
On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 06:29, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > On Friday, July 17, 2020 10:20:54 PM MST Anthony F McInerney wrote: > > On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 04:19, John M. Harris Jr > > > > wrote: > > > On Thursday, July 16, 2020 3:11:19 AM MST Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > > > there was no reason not to replac it with regular apt > > > > > > Nico touched on these already, but that's simply not possible. Rather, > > > it's > > > possible, but would immediately break your system upon installing > software > > > using apt. > > > > I believe you and Nico haven't actually touched onto what's actually > going > > on. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=apt > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Move_apt_package_from_RPM_to_DPKG_bac > > kend > > Well aware, but that doesn't solve the problem listed above: > As soon as you try to install DPKG software with this, such as from > Debian, > you will break your system. The two CANNOT be installed to the same > rootfs. > It's just not going to work. There are too many conflicts. > > this was about building packages.. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Move_apt_package_from_RPM_to_DPKG_backend#User_Experience ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Ditch RPM in favor of DPKG
On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 04:19, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > On Thursday, July 16, 2020 3:11:19 AM MST Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > there was no reason not to replac it with regular apt > > Nico touched on these already, but that's simply not possible. Rather, > it's > possible, but would immediately break your system upon installing software > using apt. > > I believe you and Nico haven't actually touched onto what's actually going on. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=apt https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Move_apt_package_from_RPM_to_DPKG_backend ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 31 Does Not Use Swap Well?
On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 at 20:44, Code Zombie wrote: > Some more info following my last Email, Swap is 8GB (equal to memory) and > the hard disk is a 2-year old 250 GB SSD. > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 3:41 PM Code Zombie > wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> I recently installed a fresh Fedora 31 in order to improve performance. I >> have started to have a new problem. When my memory fills up when launching >> an Android emulator, the system starts acting very slowly and becomes quite >> unresponsive. I used to fill both memory and swap close to 100% without >> much degraded performance, but now I wonder if there has been some changes >> in Fedora memory management causing this? And after all that, once I close >> the emulator and free up some memory out of the total 8GB physical, the >> computer starts to breathe again and back to normal. >> >> - Mehdi >> > ___ > You could try tuning swappiness to see if that improves it... https://www.howtoforge.com/tutorial/linux-swappiness/ https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/6/html/performance_tuning_guide/s-memory-tunables https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?319350-Reducing-swappiness Hope that helps! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Self Introduction: Anthony McInerney
Hi All, as per the packaging guidelines i'm just touching base to say hello. I'm hoping to get cockpit-composer into fedora, and willing to triage bugs etc as required. Need a sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659556 I have previously packaged for debian, and have been using fedora for quite some time now. (home and work) the copr is managed directly by the cockpit/welder-web team. thanks. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
