Scotch-7.0/PETSc-3.18.1 upgrade
> Hi > > Some time ago I've started working on updating to scotch-7.x, with some > initial test builds here [1]. To finalize the update, I'd like to gather > some opinions (potentially affected maintainers in CC): Hi all. Hi Sandro. PETSc is ready/tested for Scotch-7* with the release 3.18.1 They could be compiled in Rawhide now. Do you agree to syncronize the upgrades of these libraries and related dependencies? > > - Should metis get retired? Scotch has a scotchmetis compatibility > library which is advertised as a faster drop-in replacement for metis, > and indeed ships a metis.h which would conflict with the one from the > original metis package. > - Should I be adding 64-bit index builds for i686? There is a metis64 > package, but since i686 is expected to go away soonish, is it worth the > effort? This is of interest to petsc which currently BRs metis64-devel. > > Side note: I don't really recall how I ended up maintaining scotch, but > if someone who is actively using the package is willing to step up and > (co-)maintain it, please let me know! > > Thanks > Sandro > > [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/smani/scotch-7.0.0 Metis is not a "dead project", its maintainers have a GitHub project https://github.com/KarypisLab/METIS but an absent support. I would avoid to activate the Metis code in Scotch. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] Re: Soname bump of libb2 on F31/EPEL7
This mail for asking to the maintainers of `R-argon2` `borgbackup` `gtkhash` how we want to rebuild the packages against latest `libb2` update as required by rhbz#1836534 and rhbz#1836535. By buildroot override? By a side-tag method? (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/rawhide-gating/multi-builds/) On 24/05/20 12:49, Felix Schwarz wrote: > > Am 24.05.20 um 11:49 schrieb Antonio Trande: >> Can i include all dependent packages without related permissions? (i'm >> not the maintainer of `R-argon2` `borgbackup` `gtkhash`) >> >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-628ff99cfc#comment-1383812 > King regards -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Soname bump of libb2 on F31/EPEL7
This mail for asking to the maintainers of `R-argon2` `borgbackup` `gtkhash` how we want to rebuild the packages against latest `libb2` update as required by rhbz#1836534 and rhbz#1836535. By buildroot override? By a side-tag method? (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/rawhide-gating/multi-builds/) On 24/05/20 12:49, Felix Schwarz wrote: > > Am 24.05.20 um 11:49 schrieb Antonio Trande: >> Can i include all dependent packages without related permissions? (i'm >> not the maintainer of `R-argon2` `borgbackup` `gtkhash`) >> >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-628ff99cfc#comment-1383812 > King regards -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Soname bump of libb2 on F31/EPEL7
Can i include all dependent packages without related permissions? (i'm not the maintainer of `R-argon2` `borgbackup` `gtkhash`) https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-628ff99cfc#comment-1383812 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Sundials upgrade on Rawhide
On 23/05/20 14:42, David Schwörer wrote: > On 5/22/20 2:26 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: >> Scratch build: >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44816285 > > My initial try of rebuilding in copr for easier testing failed. > > I had to add > export OMPI_MCA_rmaps_base_oversubscribe=yes > to the %check section, to get it working on copr. > > Would it be better to put that flag in each spec file, or should I open > a bug against openmpi, to set this flag in %_openmpi_load? > I had noticed this problem in Copr in fact. I will add that `mpirun` option. Thank you. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Sundials upgrade on Rawhide
Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44816285 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sundials upgrade on Rawhide
Hi all. Sundials will be updated to the release `5.3.0` on Rawhide, not before next 7 days. Involved packages: dolfin octave python-steps -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: Soname bump of libb2 on F31/EPEL7
On 16/05/20 19:39, Antonio Trande wrote: > Hi all. > > `libb2-0.98.1` has been required on F31 [1] and EPEL7 [2]; it expects a > soname bump, so all dependent packages need to be rebuilt: > > $ repoquery --whatrequires libb2-devel --disablerepo=* > --enablerepo=*-source > R-argon2-0:0.2.0-8.fc32.src > borgbackup-0:1.1.11-1.fc32.src > gtkhash-0:1.2-2.fc32.src > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836534 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836535 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Soname bump of libb2 on F31/EPEL7
On 16/05/20 19:39, Antonio Trande wrote: > Hi all. > > `libb2-0.98.1` has been required on F31 [1] and EPEL7 [2]; it expects a > soname bump, so all dependent packages need to be rebuilt: > > $ repoquery --whatrequires libb2-devel --disablerepo=* > --enablerepo=*-source > R-argon2-0:0.2.0-8.fc32.src > borgbackup-0:1.1.11-1.fc32.src > gtkhash-0:1.2-2.fc32.src > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836534 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836535 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Soname bump of libb2 on F31/EPEL7
Hi all. `libb2-0.98.1` has been required on F31 [1] and EPEL7 [2]; it expects a soname bump, so all dependent packages need to be rebuilt: $ repoquery --whatrequires libb2-devel --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=*-source R-argon2-0:0.2.0-8.fc32.src borgbackup-0:1.1.11-1.fc32.src gtkhash-0:1.2-2.fc32.src -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Soname bump of libb2 on F31/EPEL7
Hi all. `libb2-0.98.1` has been required on F31 [1] and EPEL7 [2]; it expects a soname bump, so all dependent packages need to be rebuilt: $ repoquery --whatrequires libb2-devel --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=*-source R-argon2-0:0.2.0-8.fc32.src borgbackup-0:1.1.11-1.fc32.src gtkhash-0:1.2-2.fc32.src -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Documentation for EPEL modules?
On 15/05/20 14:57, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 7:57 AM Petr Pisar wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 06:30:04AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: >>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Petr Pisar wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:42:15PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: >>>>> Shortly (Martin is in Cc to confirm): >>>>> >>>>> 1) Make a module: >>>>> >>>>> $ fedpkg clone cmake3 >>>>> $ fedpkg request-repo --namespace modules --exception cmake3-latest >>>>> $ fedpkg request-branch --namespace modules --repo cmake3-latest epel8 >>>>> >>>> This will request for creating "cmake3-latest" module and "cmake3-latest" >>>> repository and "epel8" stream and "epel8" branch. I don't know if you >>>> really >>>> want to create "cmake3-latest:epel8" module stream. >>>> >>> >>> Since this is a module, is there any point in using the cmake3 namespace >>> over just cmake? >>> >> I cannot see any point. Maybe if there were cmake-2 or cmake-4 incompatible >> to >> cmake-3 but installable in parallel, then it would make sense. (Like Python.) >> Because you cannot install more streams of the same module at the same time. >> Otherwise I would also go with plain "cmake" module name. > > > It turns out, cmake already has a presence[1] in the modules namespace > of dist-git. It is a relic of the Modularity 1.0 effort, but it's > already there and that will make this easier. Petr, can you take care of this module for epel8, too? -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: Documentation for EPEL modules?
On 15/05/20 14:57, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 7:57 AM Petr Pisar wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 06:30:04AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: >>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Petr Pisar wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:42:15PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: >>>>> Shortly (Martin is in Cc to confirm): >>>>> >>>>> 1) Make a module: >>>>> >>>>> $ fedpkg clone cmake3 >>>>> $ fedpkg request-repo --namespace modules --exception cmake3-latest >>>>> $ fedpkg request-branch --namespace modules --repo cmake3-latest epel8 >>>>> >>>> This will request for creating "cmake3-latest" module and "cmake3-latest" >>>> repository and "epel8" stream and "epel8" branch. I don't know if you >>>> really >>>> want to create "cmake3-latest:epel8" module stream. >>>> >>> >>> Since this is a module, is there any point in using the cmake3 namespace >>> over just cmake? >>> >> I cannot see any point. Maybe if there were cmake-2 or cmake-4 incompatible >> to >> cmake-3 but installable in parallel, then it would make sense. (Like Python.) >> Because you cannot install more streams of the same module at the same time. >> Otherwise I would also go with plain "cmake" module name. > > > It turns out, cmake already has a presence[1] in the modules namespace > of dist-git. It is a relic of the Modularity 1.0 effort, but it's > already there and that will make this easier. Petr, can you take care of this module for epel8, too? -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Orphaning uglify-js
Hi all. `uglify-js` is no longer needed for me, so i'm orphaning it again. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: Documentation for EPEL modules?
Shortly (Martin is in Cc to confirm): 1) Make a module: $ fedpkg clone cmake3 $ fedpkg request-repo --namespace modules --exception cmake3-latest $ fedpkg request-branch --namespace modules --repo cmake3-latest epel8 2) Writing a `modulemd` file based on this example [1]: [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/making-modules/defining-modules/ 3) Build the module: $ fedpkg module-build On 14/05/20 17:51, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 06:46:29AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: >> So this happened: >> >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ad02b27ee3 >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830748 >> >> TLDR; So we need an updated version of CMake in EPEL 8 but RHEL/CentOS >> already provide a "3" version. Worse both the Fedora and EL versions >> provide "cmake3" packages and binaries so it's not possible to install the >> cmake3 package in EL 8. >> >> So here's a great use case for modularity but I have no idea how it works >> and there doesn't seem to be any EPEL specific documentation even though >> it's obviously getting used: >> >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/releases/EPEL-8M >> >> Do we need a epel8 branch? Or is the EL module created from master? >> > I believe modules in EPEL are similar to modules in Fedora. I'm not aware > about a documentation for modules in EPEL. There were some attempts to draft > the guide lines like forbiding default streams and mandating stream prefixes, > but I do not remember any output. > > Let's look at real examples. > <https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/releases/EPEL-8M> lists > avocado-latest-820200512173744.9edba152 module. That's this > <https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1506528> module build > in Koji. The Source field reads > <https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/avocado.git?#12e2140e759fdb0a4477ab2432c411a4452d8efc>. > > Theat means "fedpkg clone modules/avocado" and there these branches: > > * latest > remotes/origin/52lts > remotes/origin/69lts > remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/latest > remotes/origin/f29 > remotes/origin/latest > remotes/origin/master > remotes/origin/stable > > The module stream is called "latest", let us check "latest" branch: > > commit 12e2140e759fdb0a4477ab2432c411a4452d8efc (HEAD -> latest, > origin/latest, origin/HEAD) > Author: Merlin Mathesius > Date: Tue May 12 12:37:44 2020 -0500 > > Rebuild with avocado 79.0. > > Signed-off-by: Merlin Mathesius > > So you can see the module is built from a non-epel8 branch. An avocado.yaml > file lists these dependencies: > > dependencies: > - buildrequires: > platform: [] > requires: > platform: [] > > So "platform" is left empty to expand it by MBS on all available platforms. If > you look at koji listing > <https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=26942>, there are > five modules avocado-latest-*20200512173744 builds of from the same sources. > That probably means that Koji attempts to build the module for all Fedoras and > EPEL 8. Technically, it's possible to override the platform with "fedpkg > module-build" command, but I cannot see any trace of it in the logs. > > That buld was performed by "merlinm" users. You can ask him for more details. > > -- Petr > > > ___ > devel mailing list -- de...@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Documentation for EPEL modules?
Shortly (Martin is in Cc to confirm): 1) Make a module: $ fedpkg clone cmake3 $ fedpkg request-repo --namespace modules --exception cmake3-latest $ fedpkg request-branch --namespace modules --repo cmake3-latest epel8 2) Writing a `modulemd` file based on this example [1]: [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/making-modules/defining-modules/ 3) Build the module: $ fedpkg module-build On 14/05/20 17:51, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 06:46:29AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: >> So this happened: >> >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ad02b27ee3 >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830748 >> >> TLDR; So we need an updated version of CMake in EPEL 8 but RHEL/CentOS >> already provide a "3" version. Worse both the Fedora and EL versions >> provide "cmake3" packages and binaries so it's not possible to install the >> cmake3 package in EL 8. >> >> So here's a great use case for modularity but I have no idea how it works >> and there doesn't seem to be any EPEL specific documentation even though >> it's obviously getting used: >> >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/releases/EPEL-8M >> >> Do we need a epel8 branch? Or is the EL module created from master? >> > I believe modules in EPEL are similar to modules in Fedora. I'm not aware > about a documentation for modules in EPEL. There were some attempts to draft > the guide lines like forbiding default streams and mandating stream prefixes, > but I do not remember any output. > > Let's look at real examples. > <https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/releases/EPEL-8M> lists > avocado-latest-820200512173744.9edba152 module. That's this > <https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1506528> module build > in Koji. The Source field reads > <https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/avocado.git?#12e2140e759fdb0a4477ab2432c411a4452d8efc>. > > Theat means "fedpkg clone modules/avocado" and there these branches: > > * latest > remotes/origin/52lts > remotes/origin/69lts > remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/latest > remotes/origin/f29 > remotes/origin/latest > remotes/origin/master > remotes/origin/stable > > The module stream is called "latest", let us check "latest" branch: > > commit 12e2140e759fdb0a4477ab2432c411a4452d8efc (HEAD -> latest, > origin/latest, origin/HEAD) > Author: Merlin Mathesius > Date: Tue May 12 12:37:44 2020 -0500 > > Rebuild with avocado 79.0. > > Signed-off-by: Merlin Mathesius > > So you can see the module is built from a non-epel8 branch. An avocado.yaml > file lists these dependencies: > > dependencies: > - buildrequires: > platform: [] > requires: > platform: [] > > So "platform" is left empty to expand it by MBS on all available platforms. If > you look at koji listing > <https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=26942>, there are > five modules avocado-latest-*20200512173744 builds of from the same sources. > That probably means that Koji attempts to build the module for all Fedoras and > EPEL 8. Technically, it's possible to override the platform with "fedpkg > module-build" command, but I cannot see any trace of it in the logs. > > That buld was performed by "merlinm" users. You can ask him for more details. > > -- Petr > > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: koji build of libqxt-qt5 fails on rawhide
Looks clear:
sed: can't read ../../lib/pkgconfig/QxtDesignerPlugins-qt5.pc: No such
file or directory
even if on F32 this error is ignored.
On 15/05/20 08:14, Martin Gansser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I' am trying to compile libqxt-qt5 on rawhide [1], but this fails with the
> following error message:
> Fedora 32 [2] build fine.
>
> make[1]: Entering directory
> '/builddir/build/BUILD/libqxt-libqxt-eaf6872f6ad4/qt5/src/designer'
> /usr/lib64/qt5/bin/qmake -install qinstall -exe
> ../../lib/libQxtDesignerPlugins-qt5.so
> /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libqxt-qt5-0.7.0-0.22.20130718giteaf6872f6ad4.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/designer/libQxtDesignerPlugins-qt5.so
> sed -e s,/builddir/build/BUILD/libqxt-libqxt-eaf6872f6ad4/qt5,/usr,g
> ../../lib/pkgconfig/QxtDesignerPlugins-qt5.pc >
> /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libqxt-qt5-0.7.0-0.22.20130718giteaf6872f6ad4.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/designer/pkgconfig/QxtDesignerPlugins-qt5.pc
> sed: can't read ../../lib/pkgconfig/QxtDesignerPlugins-qt5.pc: No such file
> or directory
> make[1]: *** [Makefile:760: install_target] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> '/builddir/build/BUILD/libqxt-libqxt-eaf6872f6ad4/qt5/src/designer'
> make: *** [Makefile:117: sub-src-designer-install_subtargets] Error 2
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.2ZEK8P (%install)
> Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.2ZEK8P (%install)
> RPM build errors:
> Child return code was: 1
> EXCEPTION: [Error()]
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line
> 93, in trace
> result = func(*args, **kw)
> File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mockbuild/util.py", line 755, in
> do_with_status
> raise exception.Error("Command failed: \n # %s\n%s" % (command, output),
> child.returncode)
> mockbuild.exception.Error: Command failed:
> # bash --login -c /usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps
> /builddir/build/SPECS/libqxt-qt5.spec
>
> [1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4180/44514180/build.log
> [2] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9961/44479961/build.log
>
> Have anybody a idea ?
> Regards
> Martin
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
On 11/05/20 19:42, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for > sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life > > sagitter: uglify-js, apbs > I need these packages. I will take them. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Announce soname bump of zipper library
On 10/05/20 14:28, Igor Raits wrote: > On Sun, 2020-05-10 at 14:14 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: >> Hi all. > > Hi Antonio, > >> `zipper` library will be upgraded to the release 1.0.1 with a soname >> bump in a week. > > Thanks a lot for announcing this. > >> Dependent packages: >> COPASI >> libCombine > > I assume you will rebuild those or you need some help with that? No, really. > Will > you make this happen in a side tag¹? > > ¹https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/rawhide-gating/multi-builds/ > Can you make an example about how to use this process, please? -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Announce soname bump of zipper library
Hi all. `zipper` library will be upgraded to the release 1.0.1 with a soname bump in a week. Dependent packages: COPASI libCombine -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
CMake3-3.17.1 on EPEL7
Hi all. `CMake3` on EPEL7 has been updated to the release 3.17.1; it's available for testing. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b6a455afdf -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] CMake3-3.17.1 on EPEL7
Hi all. `CMake3` on EPEL7 has been updated to the release 3.17.1; it's available for testing. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b6a455afdf -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Get a list of scratch builds from koji?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks and select the `Owner:` (your FAS name), under `State:` select `All` On 23/04/20 15:34, Artur Iwicki wrote: > I looked through the help / --help for the command and tried searching the > wiki and didn't find an answer, so I'm asking here: is there any way to > retrieve a list of scratch builds I've submitted to koji? > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Build failure of Crawl on F32+
On 22/04/20 13:34, Mark Knoop wrote: > At 12:00 on 22 Apr 2020, Antonio Trande wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> Any idea about why this error comes out on F32+ and not on F31? >> >> ``` >> ui.cc:2086:12: error: 'iswalnum' was not declared in this scope; did you >> mean 'isaalnum'? >> 2086 | return iswalnum(c) || c == '_' || c == '-'; >> |^~~~ >> |isaalnum >> make: *** [Makefile:1601: ui.o] Error 1 >> ``` > > Perhaps: > > #include > So easy... Thank you. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Build failure of Crawl on F32+
Hi all. Any idea about why this error comes out on F32+ and not on F31? ``` ui.cc:2086:12: error: 'iswalnum' was not declared in this scope; did you mean 'isaalnum'? 2086 | return iswalnum(c) || c == '_' || c == '-'; |^~~~ |isaalnum make: *** [Makefile:1601: ui.o] Error 1 ``` GitHub ticket: https://github.com/crawl/crawl/issues/1372 Build on F31: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43635124 Build on F33: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43636815 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Assimp soname bump
Please, let me rebuild Pioneer before pushing. I need newer `assimp` src package. On 19/04/20 02:16, Rich Mattes wrote: > Hi, > > I plan to update assimp from 3.3.1 to the latest release (5.0.1) in > rawhide this week. The following packages will be affected: > > fawkes-0:1.3.0-11.fc33.src > mrpt-0:1.4.0-17.fc33.src > pioneer-0:20200203-1.fc33.src > vkmark-0:2017.08-0.8.20180123git68b6f23.fc32.src > > I will take care of the rebuilds and any fallout/updates that need to > happen. > > Rich -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Updating MUMPS/Sundials/PETSc
The release 3.13.0-4 should be okay.
> On 09/04/20 02:37, David S wrote>
> I found an issue, where linking against petsc (mpi version) and hdf5
> (serial version), this causes an error with unresolved dependencies for
> libpetsc.so
> This is caused by petsc linking against the mpi hdf5, but I only had
> hdf5-devel installed. Thus the linker selected the serial version.
> Thus I needed to install the hdf5-{mpich,openmpi}-devel package if
> linking against petsc(mpi) and hdf5.
> This was confusing for me, and there might be other libraries affected
> by this.
> Maybe a
> Requires: (hdf5-mpich-devel if hdf5-devel)
> for the petsc-mpich-devel could help - but I am not sure about this one.
> I am neither sure that this is sufficient, nor whether this is the right
> place to do this.
>
> Thanks for getting this all fixed,
> David
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Updating MUMPS/Sundials/PETSc
On 06/04/20 16:19, David Schwörer wrote: > On 4/5/20 6:06 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: >> On 04/04/20 19:23, David S wrote: >>> On 4/4/20 4:38 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: >>>> Hi all. >>>> >>>> `MUMPS-5.3.0` [1] `PETSc-3.13.0` [2] and `Sundials-5.2.0` [3] are coming >>>> on Rawhide; these updates will need rebuilds of dependent packages: >>>> >>> [:snip:] >>> >>> >>> Thanks a lot for updating PETSc, I know PETSc is quite challenging to >>> package. >>> >>> I tried to build BOUT++ against PETSc, using pkg-config. >>> the pkg-config files are installed to petsc/ subdirectory, but it seems >>> the pc files are not adjusted for this. >>> >>> Further, I have been using petsc --with superludist without issues, can >>> you tell why this was disabled, so I can test whether this was fixed in >>> the mean time? >> >> `superludist` support is reactivated; please, test petsc-3.13.0 again: >> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/build/1328023/ >> > > In the PETSc.pc files, the $MPI_INCLUDE are not expanded, which also > doesn't happen at evaluation time: > pkg-config PETSc --cflags > -I$MPI_INCLUDE/petsc > > which isn't further evaluated. I guess replacing the ' with " in the > spec should ensure it gets evaluated. > > PETSc is injecting -L/usr/lib which will cause linking issues if there > is e.g. a libhdf5.so in /usr/lib because the MPI lib is needed. > > Besides these two issues, everything seems to be fine. Last build on Copr should fix these issues. Please, test it again: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/build/1329534/ > > Thanks, > David > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Updating MUMPS/Sundials/PETSc
On 04/04/20 19:23, David S wrote: > On 4/4/20 4:38 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> `MUMPS-5.3.0` [1] `PETSc-3.13.0` [2] and `Sundials-5.2.0` [3] are coming >> on Rawhide; these updates will need rebuilds of dependent packages: >> > [:snip:] > > > Thanks a lot for updating PETSc, I know PETSc is quite challenging to > package. > > I tried to build BOUT++ against PETSc, using pkg-config. > the pkg-config files are installed to petsc/ subdirectory, but it seems > the pc files are not adjusted for this. > > Further, I have been using petsc --with superludist without issues, can > you tell why this was disabled, so I can test whether this was fixed in > the mean time? `superludist` support is reactivated; please, test petsc-3.13.0 again: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/build/1328023/ >> >> [1] >> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/build/1327044/ >> >> [2] >> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/build/1327319/ >> >> [3] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43020532 >> >> >> ___ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> >> -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Updating MUMPS/Sundials/PETSc
Hi all. `MUMPS-5.3.0` [1] `PETSc-3.13.0` [2] and `Sundials-5.2.0` [3] are coming on Rawhide; these updates will need rebuilds of dependent packages: $ repoquery --release rawhide --whatrequires MUMPS-devel --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora-*-source --enablerepo=updates*-source Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:42 ago on sab 4 apr 2020, 17:17:00. coin-or-Cbc-0:2.10.5-1.fc33.src coin-or-Clp-0:1.17.5-1.fc33.src coin-or-Ipopt-0:3.13.0-1.fc33.src freefem++-0:4.4.2-2.fc32.src mld2p4-0:2.2.1-5.fc32.src $ repoquery --release rawhide --whatrequires sundials-devel --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora-*-source --enablerepo=updates*-source Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:57 ago on sab 4 apr 2020, 17:17:00. dolfin-0:2019.1.0.post0-2.fc32.src octave-6:5.2.0-1.fc32.src $ repoquery --release rawhide --whatrequires petsc-devel --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora-*-source --enablerepo=updates*-source Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:12 ago on sab 4 apr 2020, 17:17:00. dolfin-0:2019.1.0.post0-2.fc32.src freefem++-0:4.4.2-2.fc32.src getdp-0:3.3.0-2.fc32.src [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/build/1327044/ [2] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/build/1327319/ [3] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43020532 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: ICE: The location of the "-fstack-clash-protection" flag has changed - please rebuild annobin
On 26/03/20 12:39, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, > > I've been hit today three times already with $subject. I've waited > several hours, but it is still happening. > > Is this a known state? Is there some annobin/gcc rebuild currently in > progress? > > (I'm using devel to communicate this so other who are also hit by that > know what's going on.) > > Thanks, Same issue for me, building `notepadqq` on Fedora 33: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42772712 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: Upgrading of msgpack on EPEL7
On 18/03/20 14:51, Felix Schwarz wrote: > > Am 18.03.20 um 12:51 schrieb Antonio Trande: >> I'm going to update `msgpack` to the release 3.1.0 on EPEL7. >> It shouldn't provide a newer library version than the current 1.4.1 release. > > Thank for the heads up. > > Just to be sure - this does not affect python36-msgpack, right? > (otherwise I'd have to adapt borgbackup which depends on python36-msgpack) No. i think. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Upgrading of msgpack on EPEL7
Hi all. I'm going to update `msgpack` to the release 3.1.0 on EPEL7. It shouldn't provide a newer library version than the current 1.4.1 release. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: libIDL missing on F32
On 10/03/20 19:31, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 6:17 PM Antonio Trande wrote: >> >> Hi all. >> >> libIDL missing on F32. Please, fix it. > > It has been fixed for builds, it will be fixed in the next compose. > > Out of interest which packages are affected? IceCat: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1476197 However, i have just read that it's a removed dependency ... -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Unretiring procedure of python-cclib package
Hi all. A new release of `python-cclib` package has been reviewed for unretiring process: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9313 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
libIDL missing on F32
Hi all. libIDL missing on F32. Please, fix it. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Unretiring procedure for python-cclib
Hi all. I wish to claim the python-cclib package's mantainership. New review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808571 Best regards -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Package reviews
Hi all. I have two new packages ready for the review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808573 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808571 I'm available to review other packages in return. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Orphaning 'antimony' package
Hi all. Antimony (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/antimony) is an orphan package since today. Feel free to take it. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Seeking co-maintainer for libffi package
Add me as co-maintainer, please. I'm using libffi as dependency for a couple of packages. On 25/02/20 16:56, Anthony Green wrote: > Hello -- I'm the current Fedora maintainer for libffi, as well as the > upstream author/maintainer. I'm looking for help with libffi > packaging. Specifically, we need to roll out a new ABI-breaking > release (required for ARM64 and Intel CET support), and I don't have > the volunteer time available to create the requisite compat packages, > monitor all of the rebuilds, etc. It would be best if this person > had some Fedora packaging experience under their belt, given some of > the complexities involved and the criticality of libffi to the whole > platform. > > Thanks! > > AG > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] devtoolset-8 packages missing on epel7-ppc64le
Hi all. Do you know why `devtoolset-8*` packages are missing on epel7-ppc64le? https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41425383 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [F32] Avogadro moves to Avogadro2
On 19/01/20 19:51, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 7:47 PM Antonio Trande wrote:
>>
>> Hi all.
>>
>> Avogadro(1) package supports Python2 only.
>> My intention is to retire this package on Fedora 32+; at the same time,
>> Avogadro2 will be the replacement of Avogadro(1) on Fedora 32+ by moving
>> up the Epoch to 1, and obsoleting the old Avogadro(1).
>>
>> Summarizing, starting from Fedora 32:
>> Avogadro(1) --> retired
>> Avogadro2 will have (avogadro-1.3.0 does not exist but will obsolete
>> any 1.2.0 release):
>>
>> %if 0%{?fedora} > 31
>> `Epoch: 1`
>> `Obsoletes: avogadro < 0:1.3.0-1`
>> `Provides: avogadro = 1:%{version}-%{release}`
>> %endif
>
> Two questions:
>
> - is avogadro2 compatible with avogadro? if not, it should not provide
> the old package, and if it is parallel installable, also not obsolete
> it.
They will not be installable together, not for compatibility issue but
because avogadro(1) (without Python2) will not be available anymore.
> - does avogadro2 have a smaller version than avogadro(1)? looking at
> its homepage, that does not seem to be the case. so ... why do you
> need Epoch?
>
None smaller version than avogadro(1). Epoch should make Avogadro2 the
new Avogadro since the v2 release (like upstream wrote) is a re-writed
Avogadro project under development.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[F32] Avogadro moves to Avogadro2
Hi all.
Avogadro(1) package supports Python2 only.
My intention is to retire this package on Fedora 32+; at the same time,
Avogadro2 will be the replacement of Avogadro(1) on Fedora 32+ by moving
up the Epoch to 1, and obsoleting the old Avogadro(1).
Summarizing, starting from Fedora 32:
Avogadro(1) --> retired
Avogadro2 will have (avogadro-1.3.0 does not exist but will obsolete
any 1.2.0 release):
%if 0%{?fedora} > 31
`Epoch: 1`
`Obsoletes: avogadro < 0:1.3.0-1`
`Provides: avogadro = 1:%{version}-%{release}`
%endif
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Pymol is broken on Fedora 31
Ticket: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9137 On 31/12/19 12:33, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 31. 12. 19 12:12, Antonio Trande wrote: >> The review is complete. Please, add me as maintainer. >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780849 > > https://pagure.io/releng/new_issue?template=package_unretirement=Unretire%20pymol > > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Pymol is broken on Fedora 31
The review is complete. Please, add me as maintainer. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780849 On 07/12/19 12:51, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 07. 12. 19 12:46, Antonio Trande wrote: >> I'm interested. > > Cool. At this point, it would need a new package review (pymol was > retired more than 8 weeks ago). Feel free to share it here, I can take a > look. > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Removing a commit
On 21/12/19 21:50, Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> Yes, >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/petsc4py/c/cf25d6d376fc95034decec02c2e1501f97ae4955?branch=epel7 > > It failed because it can't tell which branch to restore the state to, > since you're reverting a merge commit. > > "git revert HEAD -m 1" does what you want, I think. > "-m 1" tells git to restore to the state of the epel7 branch, not the > master branch, which was merged into epel7. > > Fabio It's working.. Thank you very much. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Removing a commit
On 21/12/19 21:38, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 9:30 PM Antonio Trande wrote: >> >> On 21/12/19 21:19, Fabio Valentini wrote: >>> On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 9:11 PM Antonio Trande >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all. >>>> >>>> Please, can you help me to remove this last commit on EPEL7 branch? >>>> >>>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/petsc4py/c/e47fbb3ef419b7be939108c2b1deff3f105bfdbc?branch=epel7 >>>> >>>> (I wish top return to the 3.11.0 release of petsc4py) >>> >>> git commits cannot be removed from dist-git. >>> If you have not built this commit for EPEL7, then reverting the >>> unwanted commits and pushing the result should do what you want? >>> (I see that this is a merge commit, and I don't know how smart git is >>> with reverting merge commits. You'll have to try to see it, I guess.) >>> >>> Fabio >>> >> >> Hi Fabio. >> >> $ fedpkg switch-branch epel7 >> Branch 'epel7' set up to track remote branch 'epel7' from 'origin'. > > > >> $ git reset --hard cf25d6d376fc95034decec02c2e1501f97ae4955 >> HEAD is now at cf25d6d Rebuild for PETSc-3.11.3 >> >> $ git commit -am "Undo latest commit" >> On branch epel7 >> Your branch is behind 'origin/epel7' by 6 commits, and can be >> fast-forwarded. >> (use "git pull" to update your local branch) >> >> nothing to commit, working tree clean > > That's why I wrote "revert" and not "reset". Because it failed: $ fedpkg switch-branch epel7 Branch 'epel7' set up to track remote branch 'epel7' from 'origin'. $ git revert cf25d6d376fc95034decec02c2e1501f97ae4955 error: commit cf25d6d376fc95034decec02c2e1501f97ae4955 is a merge but no -m option was given. fatal: revert failed > > Which commit is the one you want to restore the epel7 branch to? cf25d6d? > Yes, https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/petsc4py/c/cf25d6d376fc95034decec02c2e1501f97ae4955?branch=epel7 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Removing a commit
On 21/12/19 21:19, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 9:11 PM Antonio Trande wrote: >> >> Hi all. >> >> Please, can you help me to remove this last commit on EPEL7 branch? >> >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/petsc4py/c/e47fbb3ef419b7be939108c2b1deff3f105bfdbc?branch=epel7 >> >> (I wish top return to the 3.11.0 release of petsc4py) > > git commits cannot be removed from dist-git. > If you have not built this commit for EPEL7, then reverting the > unwanted commits and pushing the result should do what you want? > (I see that this is a merge commit, and I don't know how smart git is > with reverting merge commits. You'll have to try to see it, I guess.) > > Fabio > Hi Fabio. $ fedpkg switch-branch epel7 Branch 'epel7' set up to track remote branch 'epel7' from 'origin'. $ git reset --hard cf25d6d376fc95034decec02c2e1501f97ae4955 HEAD is now at cf25d6d Rebuild for PETSc-3.11.3 $ git commit -am "Undo latest commit" On branch epel7 Your branch is behind 'origin/epel7' by 6 commits, and can be fast-forwarded. (use "git pull" to update your local branch) nothing to commit, working tree clean $ ll total 36 petsc4py-3.11.0-bug125.patch petsc4py-mpich_set_dir.patch petsc4py-openmpi_set_dir.patch petsc4py.spec 21.25 sources $ git push To ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/petsc4py ! [rejected]epel7 -> epel7 (non-fast-forward) error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://sagit...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/petsc4py' hint: Updates were rejected because the tip of your current branch is behind hint: its remote counterpart. Integrate the remote changes (e.g. hint: 'git pull ...') before pushing again. hint: See the 'Note about fast-forwards' in 'git push --help' for details. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Removing a commit
Hi all. Please, can you help me to remove this last commit on EPEL7 branch? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/petsc4py/c/e47fbb3ef419b7be939108c2b1deff3f105bfdbc?branch=epel7 (I wish top return to the 3.11.0 release of petsc4py) Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Unretiring procedure for PyMOL
Hi all. `pymol` is currently a "dead package". I prepared a new src-rpm to review it. Review ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780849 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Pymol is broken on Fedora 31
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780849 On 07/12/19 12:51, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 07. 12. 19 12:46, Antonio Trande wrote: >> I'm interested. > > Cool. At this point, it would need a new package review (pymol was > retired more than 8 weeks ago). Feel free to share it here, I can take a > look. > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Pymol is broken on Fedora 31
I'm interested. On 07/12/19 12:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 07. 12. 19 11:53, Henrique Castro wrote: >> Hello! >> Pymol is a package that, integrated with python-rdkit and other python >> packages, makes the lives of people working with drug discovery (and >> chemistry in general too) much easier. Unfortunately, the package is >> broken and not even build into F31. The maintainer has not replied to >> a BZ ticket open months ago.[1] >> At this point, the absence of the package is realy making an impact in >> science made with Fedora. >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754678 > > Unfortunately, pymol needs an active maintainer. Since it is retired, > any Fedora packager can request it to be unretired and become the owner > of it. > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)
Add me as maintainer please. On 28/11/19 19:07, Jan De Luyck wrote: > Hi List, > > Due to time constraints in my private life (which have changed a lot > lately) I'm going to orphan Notepadqq. > > If anybody is interested? > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Packages which are losing python2-scons on Fedora 32
$ repoquery --release rawhide --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=updates-source --enablerepo=fedora-source --whatrequires python2-scons minicomputer-0:1.41-26.fc31.src -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Python 2 exodus is happening now
> shedskin > (→ PY2) > toshio > python-q > python2-q (→ PY2) > trasher > glpi > (→ macromilter → PY2) > iipsrv > (→ macromilter → PY2) > iipsrv-httpd-fcgi (→ iipsrv → macromilter → PY2) > ttorling > python-mock > python2-mock (→ PY2) > python-pysocks > python2-pysocks (→ PY2) > uggla > python-colorclass > python2-colorclass (→ PY2) > verdurin > minicomputer > (BuildRequires: python2-scons → PY2) > mmseq > (→ samtools → PY2) > samtools > (→ PY2) > wtaymans > python-gstreamer1 > python2-gstreamer1 (→ PY2) > xaeth > python-augeas > python2-augeas (→ PY2) > zbyszek > mpich > python2-mpich (→ PY2) > > > The code that generates this list is inspectable at: > https://github.com/hroncok/Fedora_Py2_removal/blob/miro/dependencies.ipynb > (The list in here is edited slightly by hand.) > > ### Packages to retire > > angrydd > archivemail > archmage > asterisk > asterisk-sounds-core > audit-viewer > b43-tools > captcp > ccnet > configsnap > ddiskit > diffuse > docco > exaile > findthatword > fslint > gdesklets > getmail > git-remote-hg > glpi > glue-validator > gourmet > hgview > iipsrv > k3d > libsearpc > macromilter > magicor > mailman > mmseq > monsterz > nfspy > oggify > pagekite > pdf-stapler > php-horde-horde > php-horde-imp > php-horde-ingo > php-horde-kronolith > php-horde-mnemo > php-horde-nag > php-horde-passwd > php-horde-turba > php-horde-wicked > proxyfuzz > pyifp > pypoppler > pyside-tools > python-arc > python-backports > python-enum34 > python-gtkextra > python-pydns > python-socksipychain > python-subprocess32 > python-volatility > python2-more-itertools > python2-pluggy > python2-pytest > rocket-depot > seafile > seafile-client > seahorse-adventures > shedskin > slingshot > squeal > sx > system-config-httpd > system-config-rootpassword > tortoisehg > trac-authopenid-plugin > trac-mercurial-plugin > tuxcut > viewmtn > vim-vimoutliner > virtio-forwarder > whipper > x-tile > yaws > > ### Subpackages to drop > > PyQt4: PyQt4, PyQt4-devel, PyQt4-webkit > PyYAML: python2-pyyaml > audit: python2-audit > boost: boost-mpich-python2, boost-mpich-python2-devel, boost-numpy2, > boost-openmpi-python2, boost-openmpi-python2-devel, boost-python2, > boost-python2-devel > freeorion: freeorion > gif2png: web2png > ioprocess: python2-ioprocess > libuser: python2-libuser > miniupnpc: python2-miniupnpc > mpich: python2-mpich > openmpi: python2-openmpi > protobuf: python2-protobuf > pyparsing: python2-pyparsing > pyserial: python2-pyserial > python-PyPDF2: python2-PyPDF2 > python-atomicwrites: python2-atomicwrites > python-attrs: python2-attrs > python-augeas: python2-augeas > python-cheetah: python2-cheetah > python-colorclass: python2-colorclass > python-configparser: python2-configparser > python-distutils-extra: python2-distutils-extra > python-dpkt: python2-dpkt > python-empy: python2-empy > python-funcsigs: python2-funcsigs > python-gstreamer1: python2-gstreamer1 > python-idna: python2-idna > python-iniparse: python2-iniparse > python-inotify: python2-inotify, python2-inotify-examples > python-lxml: python2-lxml > python-mako: python2-mako > python-mock: python2-mock > python-musicbrainzngs: python2-musicbrainzngs > python-mutagen: python2-mutagen > python-pathlib2: python2-pathlib2 > python-pbr: python2-pbr > python-prettytable: python2-prettytable > python-py: python2-py > python-pycodestyle: python2-pycodestyle > python-pycurl: python2-pycurl > python-pygments: python2-pygments > python-pyopengl: python2-pyopengl > python-pyside: python-pyside-devel, python2-pyside > python-pysocks: python2-pysocks > python-q: python2-q > python-qt5: python2-qt5, python2-qt5-base, python2-qt5-devel, > python2-qt5-webkit > python-scandir: python2-scandir > python-setuptools_scm: python2-setuptools_scm > python-urllib3: python2-urllib3 > python-zmq: python2-zmq, python2-zmq-tests > qpid-proton: python2-qpid-proton > qscintilla: python2-qscintilla, python2-qscintilla-devel, > python2-qscintilla-qt5, python2-qscintilla-qt5-devel > samtools: samtools > scons: python2-scons > shiboken: shiboken, shiboken-python2-devel, shiboken-python2-libs > sip: python2-pyqt4-sip, python2-pyqt5-sip, python2-sip-devel, > python2-wx-siplib > votca-csg: votca-csg, votca-csg-bash, votca-csg-common, votca-csg-doc > votca-xtp: votca-xtp, votca-xtp-doc > > > See you on the other side. > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Review Request for OpenCASCADE
Please, see vitetris: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765917 On 02/11/19 14:16, Richard Shaw wrote: > I knew the day would come and it finally did. After OpenCASCADE changed > to a true FOSS license the OCE (OpenCASCADE Community Edition) stopped > releasing new versions and is now way out of date and no longer > functions properly with FreeCAD. > > I can do a review in exchange if needed. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768090 > > Thanks, > Richard > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: GNU IceCat Updates
Hi. Glad to hear your interest about IceCat. IceCat-68.2.0 is still not entirely ready for stable releases: some features like personalized "about:icecat" homepage and privacy protection addons are not properly working/recognized yet. On 25/10/19 23:55, Alireza Hayati wrote: > Hello. I don't know if I'm right to ask this in this mailing list and if > I should post this elsewhere, please forgive me bothering you. > > I believe GNU IceCat updates are not shipped to Fedora repositories and > we're still using 60.9 version. How can I ask for updates or just remind > maintainers about it? > > Thanks and sorry I bothered. > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Claiming ownership of libcutl
Hi all. I wish to maintain libcutl, recently orphaned. Ticket #8882: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8882 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Non-responsive procedure for daveisfera
Hi all. This mail is sent as foreseen by the `Non-responsive maintainer policy` (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/). If you know Dave or how to contact him, please forward this mail. Open rhbz: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759306 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fwd: [rpms/future] PR #5: re-enable future for python2
-- Forwarded message - From: Kenneth Topp Date: Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 2:31 AM Subject: [rpms/future] PR #5: re-enable future for python2 To: toppk opened a new pull-request against the project: `future` that you are following: `` re-enable future for python2 `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/future/pull-request/5 -- *--Antonio Trande* *mail*: mailto:sagit...@fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: libb2-0.98.1 on Rawhide
libb2-0.98.1 built On 09/09/19 20:09, Felix Schwarz wrote: > > Would you mind pinging me again when the new package is actually built in > rawhide? > > I will run borg's test suite against the new libb2 then. The test suite is > pretty comprehensive so this should be a good indicator if we need to fix > something in borg. > > Felix -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
libb2-0.98.1 on Rawhide
Hi all. New `libb2-0.98.1` will be released by 10 days on Rawhide. Packages currently involved: $ repoquery --release rawhide --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora-source --enablerepo=updates-source --whatrequires libb2-devel Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:02 ago on lun 9 set 2019, 18:31:15. R-argon2-0:0.2.0-6.fc31.src borgbackup-0:1.1.10-4.fc32.src gtkhash-0:1.2-1.fc32.src -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [HEADS UP] Retiring python2 and introducing python27 later this week
`python2-reportlab` looks no longer used by other packages. `python2-scons` is still required instead: $ repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora-source --enablerepo=updates-source --release rawhide --whatrequires python2-scons libffado-0:2.4.1-6.fc30.src minicomputer-0:1.41-26.fc31.src mypaint-0:1.2.1-20.fc30.src On 28/08/19 13:08, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 28. 08. 19 13:02, Antonio Trande wrote: >> I guess we need to keep `python2-reportlab` and `python2-scons`. > For what? > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [HEADS UP] Retiring python2 and introducing python27 later this week
`python2-reportlab` looks no longer used by other packages. `python2-scons` is still required instead: $ repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora-source --enablerepo=updates-source --release rawhide --whatrequires python2-scons libffado-0:2.4.1-6.fc30.src minicomputer-0:1.41-26.fc31.src mypaint-0:1.2.1-20.fc30.src On 28/08/19 13:08, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 28. 08. 19 13:02, Antonio Trande wrote: >> I guess we need to keep `python2-reportlab` and `python2-scons`. > For what? > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [HEADS UP] Retiring python2 and introducing python27 later this week
I guess we need to keep `python2-reportlab` and `python2-scons`. On 27/08/19 22:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: > We are retiring python2 and introducing python27 later this week. > Rawhide only. > > If you plan to keep a Python 2 package in Fedora 32+, talk to me, I can > help you draft an exception request. > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [HEADS UP] Retiring python2 and introducing python27 later this week
I guess we need to keep `python2-reportlab` and `python2-scons`. On 27/08/19 22:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: > We are retiring python2 and introducing python27 later this week. > Rawhide only. > > If you plan to keep a Python 2 package in Fedora 32+, talk to me, I can > help you draft an exception request. > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: gnustep-base 1.26.0
'unrar' is a RPMFusion package. On 25/08/19 14:16, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > gnustep-base-libs-1.25.0-14.fc31.x86_64 > openvpn-auth-ldap-2.0.3-28.fc31.x86_64 > libgnustep-base.so.1.25()(64bit) > raidem-0.3.1-39.fc31.x86_64 > libgnustep-base.so.1.25()(64bit) > unar-1.10.1-12.fc31.x86_64 > libgnustep-base.so.1.25()(64bit) > > You'd need to rebuild unar too. > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 1:01 PM Antonio Trande wrote: >> >> Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37267892 >> >> On 25/08/19 12:38, Antonio Trande wrote: >>> Hi all. >>> >>> 'gnustep-base' package will be pushed on Rawhide in 10 days. >>> -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: gnustep-base 1.26.0
Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37267892 On 25/08/19 12:38, Antonio Trande wrote: > Hi all. > > 'gnustep-base' package will be pushed on Rawhide in 10 days. > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
gnustep-base 1.26.0
Hi all. 'gnustep-base' package will be pushed on Rawhide in 10 days. Packages involved: $ repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora-source --enablerepo=updates-source --release=rawhide --whatrequires gnustep-base-devel Fedora rawhide - Updates Source 764 kB/s | 7.6 MB 00:10 Fedora rawhide - Source 719 kB/s | 7.6 MB 00:10 Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:02 ago on dom 25 ago 2019, 12:37:41. *openvpn-auth-ldap-0:2.0.3-28.fc31.src * *raidem-0:0.3.1-39.fc31.src * -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: Missing python-rpm-macros>3.30 on EPEL7 ppc64le
When will it happen? On 09/08/19 15:39, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Will do. I was waiting for the release to happen. > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Missing python-rpm-macros>3.30 on EPEL7 ppc64le
Hi all. 'python-devel-2.7.5-86.el7' requires 'python(2)-rpm-macros > 3-30' on EPEL7 ppc64le only? https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=36879492=DEFAULT=root.log=-4000 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Missing python-rpm-macros>3.30 on EPEL7 ppc64le
Hi all. 'python-devel-2.7.5-86.el7' requires 'python(2)-rpm-macros > 3-30' on EPEL7 ppc64le only? https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=36879492=DEFAULT=root.log=-4000 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Sundials2 on EPEL7
Thank you Robert. On 08/08/19 20:45, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On Thursday, 8 August 2019 19:11:32 CEST Antonio Trande wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> Please, can anyone explain to me why an EPEL7 branch for sundials2 >> cannot be created? >> >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sundials2/branches?branchname=master >> https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/14973 > It's a bug with the script they are using to create the branch I think. > > The branch exists in PDC: > https://pdc.fedoraproject.org/rest_api/v1/component-branches/?global_component=sundials2 > > The branch has not been created in dist-git, but you can create it manually > and it should work: > > git checkout -b epel7 > git push --set-upstream origin epel7 > > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sundials2 on EPEL7
Hi all. Please, can anyone explain to me why an EPEL7 branch for sundials2 cannot be created? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sundials2/branches?branchname=master https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/14973 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL-ANNOUNCE EPEL-8 package requests are now open
Hi all. What's wrong? $ fedpkg clone scons $ pushd scons $ fedpkg request-branch epel8 Could not execute request_branch: This package is already an EL package and is built on all supported arches, therefore, it cannot be in EPEL. If this is a mistake or you have an exception, please contact the Release Engineering team. On 01/08/19 19:33, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > ## Developer request for branching multiple packages > > Branching is handled the same way as requesting a branch using `fedpkg > request-branch`. A maintainer can request an epel8 branch using `fedpkg > request-branch epel8` which will create a ticket in > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issues and Release > Engineering will process these requests. > > To branch multiple packages please use this or a variant of this script: > ``` > #!/usr/bin/sh > # Reminder to get an updated pagure token for releng tickets > # Usage: epel-8.sh foo bar goo blah blech > if [ $# -lt 1 ] > then > echo "At least one package name should be provided" > else > TMPDIR=`mktemp -d /tmp/epel8.XX` > pushd "$TMPDIR" > for pkg in "$@" > do > fedpkg clone "$pkg" > pushd "$pkg" > fedpkg request-branch epel8 > fedpkg request-branch epel8-playground > popd > done > rm -rfv "$TMPDIR" > fi > ``` > > > Releng will then work through the tickets in the system which is adding > branches to the PDC and src.fedoraproject.org > <http://src.fedoraproject.org>. > > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sundials2 and review swap
Hi all. Package review of Sundials2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733704 Available to reviewing another package in return. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fwd: MUMPS-5.2.1 coming on rawhide
-- Forwarded message - From: Antonio Trande Date: Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 3:27 AM Subject: Re: MUMPS-5.2.1 coming on rawhide To: Adam Williamson I had rebuilt all them including the bootstrap step of Clp of course. 10 days have passed since then, i have erased those rebuilds. This is just an issue of how much time a maintainer needs to respond to a soname bump; in future, i could even wait 15 or more days before pushing a new library but if other maintainers are slower to rebuild their own packages or busy, i can't do nothing. On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 8:23 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2019-07-30 at 20:15 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: > > On 30/07/19 19:35, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Sun, 2019-07-21 at 11:10 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: > > > > Hi all. > > > > > > > > MUMPS-5.2.1 is coming on Rawhide. > > > > Involved packages have been rebuilt on Copr for testing: > > > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/builds/ > > > > > > Hi, there. It's better if you give more than one day of notice, and > > > notify the maintainers of consuming packages directly. This broke coin- > > > or-Clp, which in turn breaks opencv, which breaks quite a lot of other > > > stuff. I'm currently trying to get coin-or-Clp to rebuild (it seems to > > > be a bootstrap situation). > > > > > > > Okay, but all dependent packages were already successfully rebuilt on > > Copr before. > > It was enough to rebuild them. > > Either you missed one or you hit a very small window, then, because > coin-or-Clp did not simply rebuild successfully, because it needs to be > flipped to do a bootstrap build when you bump the mumps soname, then > flipped back to do a normal non-bootstrap build once the bootstrap > build is done. > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > http://www.happyassassin.net > > -- *--Antonio Trande* *mail*: mailto:sagit...@fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: MUMPS-5.2.1 coming on rawhide
On 30/07/19 19:35, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2019-07-21 at 11:10 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> MUMPS-5.2.1 is coming on Rawhide. >> Involved packages have been rebuilt on Copr for testing: >> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/builds/ > > Hi, there. It's better if you give more than one day of notice, and > notify the maintainers of consuming packages directly. This broke coin- > or-Clp, which in turn breaks opencv, which breaks quite a lot of other > stuff. I'm currently trying to get coin-or-Clp to rebuild (it seems to > be a bootstrap situation). > Okay, but all dependent packages were already successfully rebuilt on Copr before. It was enough to rebuild them. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Fwd: [Bug 1733704] Review Request: sundials2 - Suite of nonlinear solvers
Forwarded Message Subject: [Bug 1733704] Review Request: sundials2 - Suite of nonlinear solvers Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 18:10:59 + From: bugzi...@redhat.com Reply-To: package-rev...@lists.fedoraproject.org To: package-rev...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733704 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Package Review |Package Review Version|rawhide |epel7 Product|Fedora |Fedora EPEL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-rev...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-rev...@lists.fedoraproject.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Packages with wrong Python unversioned commands
On 22/07/19 12:03, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello Bcc'ed maintainers. Hi Miro. > sagitter ProDy autowrap future preprocess scons These packages should be okay. 'Scons' will need of an exception for Python2 > > According to the > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_means_Python3 change, the > unversioned Python commands shell be Python 3. > > The following packages have Python 3 marked commands (executables in > /usr/bin/) but miss the not marked files. > > The format is: > > : [python2-package]: > > Please, make the normal unversioned command Python 3 and move it to the > python3 subpackage. > Add proper conflicts when moving files from one package to another. > > Note that if the user shall not care whether the tool is executed by > Python 2 or Python 3, drop the Python 2 command completely. > > Do this in rawhide (Fedora 31+) only. > > Thanks... > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Packages with wrong Python unversioned commands
On 22/07/19 12:03, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello Bcc'ed maintainers. Hi Miro. > sagitter ProDy autowrap future preprocess scons These packages should be okay. 'Scons' will need of an exception for Python2 > > According to the > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_means_Python3 change, the > unversioned Python commands shell be Python 3. > > The following packages have Python 3 marked commands (executables in > /usr/bin/) but miss the not marked files. > > The format is: > > : [python2-package]: > > Please, make the normal unversioned command Python 3 and move it to the > python3 subpackage. > Add proper conflicts when moving files from one package to another. > > Note that if the user shall not care whether the tool is executed by > Python 2 or Python 3, drop the Python 2 command completely. > > Do this in rawhide (Fedora 31+) only. > > Thanks... > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
MUMPS-5.2.1 coming on rawhide
Hi all. MUMPS-5.2.1 is coming on Rawhide. Involved packages have been rebuilt on Copr for testing: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/builds/ -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Updating of petsc/petsc4py/sundials/bionetgen on EPEL 7
Hi all. Following packages may be upgraded on EPEL 7: - Updates to PETSc-3.10.4 (1) (against current PETSc-3.9.3 (2)) - Update to petsc4py-3.10.1 (requires PETSc-3.10) - Update to sundials-4.1.0 (against current sundials-2 (3)) - Update to bionetgen-2.5.0 (it's now bundles/provides/requires a cvode2 module, so is independent by Sundials-3+) Please, test them: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-1a18c3e4c6 Regarding all third party Copr projects (4), if these updates will be accepted, they will need to create their own sundials2 src-rpms or adapt current SRPMs to the newer Sundials-4*, i guess. (1) https://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/documentation/changes/310.html (2) https://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/documentation/changes/39.html (3) https://computation.llnl.gov/projects/sundials/release-history (4) https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-1a18c3e4c6#comment-968109 Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Openscad
It's already upgraded on Fedora 30+ https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=openscad On 15/06/19 20:56, Howard Howell wrote: > HI, everyone, > Is there a plan to upgrade OpenSCAD to 2019-05? That is the > latest release according to the website? > > Regards, > Les H > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Python 3.8 failures to triage -- packages failing to build
On 24/05/19 14:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 24. 05. 19 14:20, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> On 24/05/19 14:16, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>> On 24. 05. 19 13:15, Antonio Trande wrote:
>>>> On 03/05/19 15:56, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>>>> sagitter petsc4py
>>>>
>>>> Patched on rawhide.
>>>> https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/python3.8/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00914901-petsc4py/builder-live.log
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Fails for me:
>>>
>>> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.8/build/915203/
>>>
>>> Not sure how is this possible.
>>>
>>
>> The patch for python-3.8 is disabled by default:
>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/petsc4py/blob/master/f/petsc4py.spec#_25
>>
>
> Oh! I f you need to apply the patch conditionally, try this:
>
> %if 0%{?python3_version_nodots} > 37
>
Done.
Thank you.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Python 3.8 failures to triage -- packages failing to build
On 03/05/19 15:56, Miro Hrončok wrote: > sagitter petsc4py Patched on rawhide. https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/python3.8/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00914901-petsc4py/builder-live.log -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
libsbml-5.18.0
Hi all. libsbml-5.18.0 is coming on rawhide. Packages involved: COPASI-0:4.25.207-1.fc31.src libCombine-0:0.2.2-9.20180426git8902b68.fc30.src libCombine-devel-0:0.2.2-9.20180426git8902b68.fc30.i686 libCombine-devel-0:0.2.2-9.20180426git8902b68.fc30.x86_64 libnuml-0:1.1.1-14.fc30.src libsedml-1:0.4.4-1.fc31.src moose-0:3.1.4-5.fc31.src -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Python 3.8 failures to triage -- packages failing to build
On 03/05/19 15:56, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hey, > the following packages failed Python 3.8 rebuild but still needs triage. > > > sagitter petsc4py Please, rebuild as soon as Petsc-3.11.1-2 (new build against openmpi-4) will be incorporated. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sundials 4 coming on Rawhide
Hi all. Sundials 4 is coming on Rawhide branch. Dependent packages are Octave (rebuilt) and neuron (not ready for recent Sundials). -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
bionetgen and sundials
Hi all. 'BionetGen' currently is built against 'Sundials-3'; however, 'BionetGen' development is slower than 'Sundials'; BioNetGen still provides bundle old 'cvode-2.6.0' (from older sundials releases [1]) code and anyway it's not totally compatible with 'Sundials 3'. Because of these reasons i built BionetGen using the bundled cvode-2.6.0 code so as to free Sundials updates. [2] Only 'python-pysb' requires 'bionetgen' but shouldn't have negative effects. [1] https://computation.llnl.gov/projects/sundials/release-history [2] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/build/885954/ Any disagreement? Best regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Updating/rebuilding of coin-or packages
On 09/04/19 06:31, Jerry James wrote: > > That's as far as I've gotten. I haven't looked at coin-or-Bonmin, > coin-or-Couenne, coin-or-Dip, or coin-or-OS yet. Let me know if you > would like to see all these changes first, or proceed with what you have > planned first. > > Regards, > -- > Jerry James > http://www.jamezone.org/ > Batch rebuild complete: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/builds/ -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Updating/rebuilding of coin-or packages
On 15/04/19 19:25, Andrew Lutomirski wrote > Would one of you be interested in maintaining coin-or-lemon? I packaged > it because I thought I was going to use it, but I ended up not using it. > > --Andy > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Add me, please. My FAS: sagitter -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Updating/rebuilding of coin-or packages
Dear list.
I see often this "packaging style" of the documentation files:
%doc %{_docdir}/%{name}/html
Is it correct tagging an absolute path with %doc?
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Could not execute import_srpm
Thank you, Todd. Output attached and posted in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7704 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ fedpkg_test.tar.xz Description: application/xz signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Updating/rebuilding of coin-or packages
On 10/04/19 05:50, Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 4:21 AM Antonio Trande wrote: >> We can complete the coin-or-Bonmin, coin-or-Couenne, coin-or-Dip, >> coin-or-OS reviews before, of course. >> >> Let me check them. > > I had hoped to get a COPR set up tonight, but alas! I ran out of > time. You may ask permissions for my Copr project: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/permissions/ > So I just uploaded a tarball here: > > http://www.jamezone.org/coin-or.tar > > I'll leave it there for a few days. I haven't had time to review what > you have done, either. Sorry. I'm going to be busy tomorrow, too, so > I probably won't get to anything else until Thursday. > > Regards, > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Could not execute import_srpm
On 09/04/19 22:29, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 4/9/19 9:27 AM, Antonio Trande wrote: >> On 08/04/19 19:45, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: >>> Em seg, 8 de abr de 2019 às 10:09, Antonio Trande >>> escreveu: >>>> >>>> Hi all. >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Just a guess that it was the same issue as for me a few days ago. But it >>> might >>> be something else, like an offline server for some reason. >>> >>> I did not do much work on Fedora for some time, then, when uploading >>> a new source I was getting all kinds of errors. >>>Eventually fixing some .rpmsav andor .rpmorig files, >> >> ?? >> >>> plus using rdns = false >>> in /etc/krb5.conf fixed the issue. >>> For other possible issues check >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Kerberos >>> >> >> The line 'rdns = false' is already in '/etc/krb5.conf'. >> >>>> I can't upload source archive of new package 'smoldyn' >>>> >> >> I tried to download the source archive again but i'm not able to import >> the 'smoldyn' srpm by fedpkg. > > We have had at least 3 reports of this today... > (upload causing 408 error). > > Can any of you folks seeing this: > > Run this script: > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/tWt5LBT13-~d22wBpo38uQ/raw > > and send me the output? Sorry, how this script works? > > Also, if you could check and see if anything updated on your systems > since the last time it worked and what os/version you are running that > could be of help. > > if the above script works, that points to a fedpkg/rpkg problem. > If it doesn't hopefully it will give us enough info to track it down. > > Finally, I'll remind folks that for issues like these if you file a > ticket we will likely notice sooner and get the right people looking at > it than if you post to the list. > > > thanks! > > kevin > > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Could not execute import_srpm
On 08/04/19 19:45, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: > Em seg, 8 de abr de 2019 às 10:09, Antonio Trande > escreveu: >> >> Hi all. > > Hi, > > Just a guess that it was the same issue as for me a few days ago. But it > might > be something else, like an offline server for some reason. > > I did not do much work on Fedora for some time, then, when uploading > a new source I was getting all kinds of errors. >Eventually fixing some .rpmsav andor .rpmorig files, ?? > plus using rdns = false > in /etc/krb5.conf fixed the issue. > For other possible issues check > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Kerberos > The line 'rdns = false' is already in '/etc/krb5.conf'. >> I can't upload source archive of new package 'smoldyn' >> I tried to download the source archive again but i'm not able to import the 'smoldyn' srpm by fedpkg. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Updating/rebuilding of coin-or packages
On 09/04/19 06:31, Jerry James wrote: > Hi Antonio, Hi Jerry. > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 12:26 PM Antonio Trande <mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> Updates of coin-or-Sample/CoinUtils/Ipopt packages are coming on >> Rawhide; involved packages: > > I didn't know you were working on this. I've admin permissions just for some of them: Bonmin, CoinUtils, Ipopt, OS, Sample, Couenne. > I noticed a week or so ago that > several of the coin-or packages have FTBFS bugs filed against them, so I > started working on fixing and updating all of them. I had to stop due > to a trip out of town, but I got through about 4/5 of the coin-or > packages, with various improvements. Are you interested in seeing what > I've got, or would you rather just go ahead with what you've already > done? Here is a summary of what I've done so far, in the approximate > order in which the packages would have to be built. > > * coin-or-Data-miplib3: new package > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693913) > * coin-or-Data-Netlib: new package > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693514) > * coin-or-Ipopt: update to 3.12.12, correct license to "EPL-1.0", drop > unnecessary BRs and Rs > * coin-or-Sample: update to 1.2.11, drop unnecessary pkgconfig R > * coin-or-CoinUtils: update to 2.11.1, correct license to "EPL-1.0", > change URL to github, add a patch to prevent a segfault when a > problem's status has not been set (need to send that upstream), kill > rpath > * coin-or-Osi: update to 0.108.3, correct license to "EPL-1.0", change > URL to github, add patch to build with glpk >= 4.48 > (see https://github.com/coin-or/Osi/pull/121), kill rpath, drop > unnecessary BRs and Rs > * coin-or-Clp: update to 1.17.1, correct license to "EPL-1.0", change > URL to github, add bootstrap conditional due to circular build > dependencies with Cbc, build with MUMPS and suitesparse support, > build with Cbc and nauty support on the non-bootstrap build, add > patch to fix a bad static cast, add patch to fix a crash in > coin-or-lemon, add patch to fix a bad parameter when building with > Cbc support > * coin-or-DyLP: update to 1.10.4, correct license to "EPL-1.0", > install and set the path to the error text message file, kill rpath, > drop unnecessary BRs and Rs > * coin-or-Vol: update to 1.5.4, correct license to "EPL-1.0", kill > rpath, drop unnecessary BRs and Rs > * coin-or-Cgl: update to 0.60.1, correct license to "EPL-1.0", change > URL to github, kill rpath, drop unnecessary BRs and Rs > * coin-or-Cbc: update to 2.10.1, correct license to "EPL-1.0", change > URL to github, add patch to fix failure to link with glpk, build > with nauty support, drop unnecessary BRs and Rs > * coin-or-SYMPHONY: update to 5.6.17, correct license to "EPL-1.0", > change URL to github, provide the PDF manual, drop unnecessary BRs > and Rs > * coin-or-Alps: update to 1.5.7, correct license to "EPL-1.0", change > URL to github, kill rpath, drop unnecessary BRs and Rs > * coin-or-Bcp: update to 1.4.4, kill rpath, drop unnecessary BRs and Rs > * coin-or-CoinMP: update to 1.8.4, kill rpath, drop unnecessary BRs and Rs > * coin-or-FlopC++: update to 1.2.5, correct license to "EPL-1.0", > update URL, add -doc subpackage with doxygen output, kill rpath, > drop unnecessary BRs and Rs > * coin-or-lemon: add patch to fix template problem (causes FTBFS), add > patch to fix test failures due to references to temporary objects > that go out of scope, fix the cmake file to refer to a shared > library, kill rpath > * coin-or-Bcps: correct license to "EPL-1.0", change URL to github, > kill rpath, drop unnecessary BRs and Rs > * coin-or-Blis: update to 0.94.8, correct license to "EPL-1.0", change > URL to github, drop unnecessary BRs and Rs > > That's as far as I've gotten. I haven't looked at coin-or-Bonmin, > coin-or-Couenne, coin-or-Dip, or coin-or-OS yet. Let me know if you > would like to see all these changes first, or proceed with what you have > planned first. > We can complete the coin-or-Bonmin, coin-or-Couenne, coin-or-Dip, coin-or-OS reviews before, of course. Let me check them. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Updating/rebuilding of coin-or packages
Hi all. Updates of coin-or-Sample/CoinUtils/Ipopt packages are coming on Rawhide; involved packages: $ dnf repoquery --release rawhide --enablerepo=*-source --disablerepo=rpmfusion* --disablerepo=*modular* --whatrequires coin-or-CoinUtils-devel Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:02 ago on lun 08 apr 2019 18:31:27 CEST. coin-or-Alps-0:1.5.5-9.fc30.src coin-or-Alps-devel-0:1.5.5-9.fc30.i686 coin-or-Alps-devel-0:1.5.5-9.fc30.x86_64 coin-or-Bcp-0:1.4.3-9.fc30.src coin-or-Bcp-devel-0:1.4.3-9.fc30.i686 coin-or-Bcp-devel-0:1.4.3-9.fc30.x86_64 coin-or-Bcps-0:0.94.4-9.fc30.src coin-or-Bcps-devel-0:0.94.4-9.fc30.i686 coin-or-Bcps-devel-0:0.94.4-9.fc30.x86_64 coin-or-Blis-0:0.94.4-9.fc30.src coin-or-Blis-devel-0:0.94.4-9.fc30.i686 coin-or-Blis-devel-0:0.94.4-9.fc30.x86_64 coin-or-Bonmin-0:1.8.6-2.fc30.src coin-or-Bonmin-devel-0:1.8.6-2.fc30.i686 coin-or-Bonmin-devel-0:1.8.6-2.fc30.x86_64 coin-or-Cbc-0:2.9.8-10.fc30.src coin-or-Cbc-devel-0:2.9.8-10.fc30.i686 coin-or-Cbc-devel-0:2.9.8-10.fc30.x86_64 coin-or-Cgl-0:0.59.9-9.fc30.src coin-or-Cgl-devel-0:0.59.9-9.fc30.i686 coin-or-Cgl-devel-0:0.59.9-9.fc30.x86_64 coin-or-Clp-0:1.16.10-8.fc30.src coin-or-Clp-devel-0:1.16.10-8.fc30.i686 coin-or-Clp-devel-0:1.16.10-8.fc30.x86_64 coin-or-CoinMP-0:1.8.3-8.fc30.src coin-or-CoinMP-devel-0:1.8.3-8.fc30.i686 coin-or-CoinMP-devel-0:1.8.3-8.fc30.x86_64 coin-or-Couenne-0:0.5.6-18.fc30.src coin-or-Couenne-devel-0:0.5.6-18.fc30.i686 coin-or-Couenne-devel-0:0.5.6-18.fc30.x86_64 coin-or-Dip-0:0.92.2-9.fc30.src coin-or-Dip-devel-0:0.92.2-9.fc30.i686 coin-or-Dip-devel-0:0.92.2-9.fc30.x86_64 coin-or-DyLP-0:1.10.3-8.fc30.src coin-or-DyLP-devel-0:1.10.3-8.fc30.i686 coin-or-DyLP-devel-0:1.10.3-8.fc30.x86_64 coin-or-FlopC++-0:1.2.4-5.fc27.src coin-or-FlopC++-devel-0:1.2.4-5.fc27.i686 coin-or-FlopC++-devel-0:1.2.4-5.fc27.x86_64 coin-or-Ipopt-devel-0:3.12.11-4.fc30.i686 coin-or-Ipopt-devel-0:3.12.11-4.fc30.x86_64 coin-or-OS-0:2.10.1-19.fc30.src coin-or-OS-devel-0:2.10.1-19.fc30.i686 coin-or-OS-devel-0:2.10.1-19.fc30.x86_64 coin-or-Osi-0:0.107.8-9.fc30.src coin-or-Osi-devel-0:0.107.8-9.fc30.i686 coin-or-Osi-devel-0:0.107.8-9.fc30.x86_64 coin-or-SYMPHONY-0:5.6.14-9.fc30.src coin-or-SYMPHONY-devel-0:5.6.14-9.fc30.i686 coin-or-SYMPHONY-devel-0:5.6.14-9.fc30.x86_64 coin-or-Vol-0:1.5.3-9.fc30.src coin-or-Vol-devel-0:1.5.3-9.fc30.i686 coin-or-Vol-devel-0:1.5.3-9.fc30.x86_64 openms-0:2.4.0-4.fc30.src Builds tested on Copr: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/builds/ Let me know if any problem comes out before commit these changes. Best regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Could not execute import_srpm
Hi all. I can't upload source archive of new package 'smoldyn' $ fedpkg import ../../smoldyn-2.58-1.fc29.src.rpm Uploading: /home/sagitter/rpmbuild/SRPMS/fedora-scm/smoldyn/smoldyn-2.58.tgz 100.0% Could not execute import_srpm: Fail to upload files. Server returns status 408 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
