Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40

2024-02-21 Thread Didier Fabert 

Le 21/02/2024 à 08:11, Miroslav Suchý a écrit :

> sudo dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo 
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \

--assumeno distro-sync

Erreur :
 Problème 1: problème avec le paquet installé blender-1:4.0.2-1.fc39.x86_64
  - blender-1:4.0.2-1.fc39.x86_64 from @System  does not belong to a 
distupgrade repository
  - nothing provides libopenvdb.so.10.1()(64bit) needed by 
blender-1:4.0.2-1.fc40.x86_64 from fedora
 Problème 2: package audiocd-kio-libs-16.08.3-21.fc39.x86_64 from 
@System requires audiocd-kio = 16.08.3-21.fc39, but none of the 
providers can be installed
  - audiocd-kio-16.08.3-21.fc39.x86_64 from @System  does not belong to 
a distupgrade repository
  - problème avec le paquet installé 
audiocd-kio-libs-16.08.3-21.fc39.x86_64


I will try to find time this week-end to fill bz
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaning my packages

2022-06-30 Thread Didier FABERT 

I'll take ascii if nobody wants it.

thank you.

Didier FABERT
didier.fab...@gmail.com
TZ Europe/Paris

Le 29/06/2022 à 16:56, Francisco J. Tsao Santín via devel a écrit :

Hello, I've been maintaining some packages, but I can't at this time
continue taking care of them. So, next Sunday I'll orphan them if nobody
ask me the transfer:

* ascii
* netmask
* ez-pine-gpg
* python-meld3
* gpart
* python-sysv_ipc
* reptyr
* supervisor


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: bundled libraries

2020-12-24 Thread Didier Fabert 

Hi,

It's for netdata package and specifically for the cloud registration 
feature. So netdata is working fine without this feature but a lot of 
users claim this feature.


All bundled libs are static, so there is no additional .so file 
installed (neither fedora nor epel repos).


We're talking about libwebsockets (min 3.2.2 and epel provides 3.0.1) 
and a "patched" version of mosquitto


For fedora package, it's working with libwebsockets from system, but not 
mosquitto.


For epel, I have to use bundled libs (for both) otherwise, it's not working.

Best Regards,

Didier FABERT.

Le 24/12/2020 à 15:01, Antonio T. sagitter a écrit :
Bundled libraries are permitted as long as they do not conflict with 
system libraries.
In your case, it does not happen in Fedora but in EPEL it does; so i 
would advice you to use a private lib directory in EPEL where

bundled .so libraries (generally unversioned libraries) will be installed.

See 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_beware_of_rpath


Of which libraries are we talking about?

On 24/12/20 14:17, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 1:45 AM Didier Fabert <mailto:didier.fab...@gmail.com>> wrote:


    Hi,

    Yes the guidelines are clear for fedora. I miss tell that the
    package is
    present in fedora and epel repos and my question is more like this:

    Is it possible to mix bundled/system libs ? like using system libs 
(the

    must part in guidelines) for fedora packages and use bundled one for
    epel packages (because libs are too old)


That's a much more interesting question :)

The first line of the main EPEL guidelines[1] says that you must 
follow the Fedora packaging guidelines and that the EPEL links are for 
the exceptions for EPEL.


So if the library is not available in EPEL, then I would say the 
answer is yes, you can use the bundled library (even if you're not on 
Fedora).


For the 2nd question, can you use them if the ones in EPEL/RHEL are 
too old, I'd like to see more feedback from others. Theoretically 
dependencies in EPEL could be updated, but it has to be done very 
carefully. For RHEL packages, I tried filling a bug about 6 years ago 
and as far as I know it's still open, with little to no feedback from RH.






___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: bundled libraries

2020-12-24 Thread Didier Fabert 

Hi,

Thank you very much Richard.

Best Regards,

Didier FABERT.

Le 24/12/2020 à 14:17, Richard Shaw a écrit :
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 1:45 AM Didier Fabert <mailto:didier.fab...@gmail.com>> wrote:


Hi,

Yes the guidelines are clear for fedora. I miss tell that the
package is
present in fedora and epel repos and my question is more like this:

Is it possible to mix bundled/system libs ? like using system libs (the
must part in guidelines) for fedora packages and use bundled one for
epel packages (because libs are too old)


That's a much more interesting question :)

The first line of the main EPEL guidelines[1] says that you must follow 
the Fedora packaging guidelines and that the EPEL links are for the 
exceptions for EPEL.


So if the library is not available in EPEL, then I would say the answer 
is yes, you can use the bundled library (even if you're not on Fedora).


For the 2nd question, can you use them if the ones in EPEL/RHEL are too 
old, I'd like to see more feedback from others. Theoretically 
dependencies in EPEL could be updated, but it has to be done very 
carefully. For RHEL packages, I tried filling a bug about 6 years ago 
and as far as I know it's still open, with little to no feedback from RH.


Thanks,
Richard

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies 
<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies>


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: bundled libraries

2020-12-23 Thread Didier Fabert 

Hi,

Yes the guidelines are clear for fedora. I miss tell that the package is 
present in fedora and epel repos and my question is more like this:


Is it possible to mix bundled/system libs ? like using system libs (the 
must part in guidelines) for fedora packages and use bundled one for 
epel packages (because libs are too old)


I read epel guidelines[1] too but I not found an answer.

Best Regards,

Didier FABERT.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging

Le 23/12/2020 à 13:09, Richard Shaw a écrit :
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 2:11 AM Didier Fabert <mailto:didier.fab...@gmail.com>> wrote:


Hi,

How to deal with package which add new cool feature, but unfortunately
by adding bundled (static) libraries ?

1. I do nothing, this feature cannot be included this way
2. I can add the feature because libraries are statically linked
3. I can add the feature anyway if I declare bundled libs in spec file
4. Other choice...


The guidelines[1] are pretty clear here.

If the libraries are available in Fedora and upstream provides a 
mechanism to use them you MUST.


If upstream does not provide a mechanism, (and I'll add, it's not easily 
worked around in the package), then it is acceptable to bundle the 
libraries, but...


You must declare it in the package, with the version of the bundled 
library if at all possible. I've run into a few situations where it was 
more of a fork than a bundled library and the version was totally 
unidentifiable.


Thanks,
Richard

[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling 
<https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling>


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

bundled libraries

2020-12-23 Thread Didier Fabert 

Hi,

How to deal with package which add new cool feature, but unfortunately 
by adding bundled (static) libraries ?


1. I do nothing, this feature cannot be included this way
2. I can add the feature because libraries are statically linked
3. I can add the feature anyway if I declare bundled libs in spec file
4. Other choice...

Best Regards,

Didier FABERT.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[COPR] Build against libuv and Judy librairies

2020-11-05 Thread Didier Fabert 

Hi,

I try to make an epel-8 package on COPR, and I get the following errors 
in root.log

DEBUG util.py:634:  No matching package to install: 'Judy-devel'
DEBUG util.py:634:  No matching package to install: 'libuv-devel'

It's working as expected on Koji.

AM I missing something in my conf ?

Best Regards,

Didier FABERT.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: modular and personal koji

2020-07-07 Thread Didier FABERT 
Thank you Stephen, I will try asap.

Le 06/07/2020 à 17:16, Stephen John Smoogen a écrit :
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 at 10:33, Didier Fabert  wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> With my personal koji (on el8), I cannot build some packages for my el8
>> tag. All failures are about modular metadata packages which cannot be
>> installed.
>>
> Koji doesn't really understand modules and the depsolver has problems.
> For setting up EPEL we needed to do 2 things to make this work.
>
> 1. At first we needed to use grobisplitter to flatten the repos a bit
> so that koji could understand them:
> https://github.com/fedora-modularity/GrobiSplitter
> 2. We then followed
> https://smoogespace.blogspot.com/2019/07/epel-8-production-layout.html
> 3. In koji itself we needed to tell the depsolver to use dnf versus
> its own solver.
> 4. We also had to have koji to turn on the hotpatch flag so dnf would
> pull in items.
>
>
>> DEBUG util.py:621:  No available modular metadata for modular package
>> 'httpd-2.4.37-21.module_el8.2.0+382+15b0afa8.x86_64', it cannot be
>> installed on the system
>> DEBUG util.py:621:  No available modular metadata for modular package
>> 'httpd-devel-2.4.37-21.module_el8.2.0+382+15b0afa8.x86_64', it cannot be
>> installed on the system
>> DEBUG util.py:621:  No available modular metadata for modular package
>> 'httpd-filesystem-2.4.37-21.module_el8.2.0+382+15b0afa8.noarch', it
>> cannot be installed on the system
>> DEBUG util.py:621:  No available modular metadata for modular package
>> 'httpd-tools-2.4.37-21.module_el8.2.0+382+15b0afa8.x86_64', it cannot be
>> installed on the system
>> DEBUG util.py:621:  No available modular metadata for modular package
>> 'mod_http2-1.11.3-3.module_el8.2.0+307+4d18d695.x86_64', it cannot be
>> installed on the system
>> DEBUG util.py:621:  No available modular metadata for modular package
>> 'mysql-common-8.0.17-3.module_el8.0.0+181+899d6349.x86_64', it cannot be
>> installed on the system
>> DEBUG util.py:621:  No available modular metadata for modular package
>> 'mysql-devel-8.0.17-3.module_el8.0.0+181+899d6349.x86_64', it cannot be
>> installed on the system
>> DEBUG util.py:621:  No available modular metadata for modular package
>> 'mysql-libs-8.0.17-3.module_el8.0.0+181+899d6349.x86_64', it cannot be
>> installed on the system
>>
>> Any idea to solve this problem ? I miss somthing ?
>>
>> I setup my el8 tag like this
>>
>> koji add-tag centos-8
>> koji add-tag --parent "centos-8" --arches 'x86_64' centos-8-build
>> koji add-group centos-8-build build
>> koji add-group centos-8-build srpm-build
>>
>> koji add-external-repo -t centos-8-build -p 10 centos-8-external-baseos
>> http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/CentOS/8/BaseOS/\$arch/os
>> koji add-external-repo -t centos-8-build -p 15 centos-8-external-epel
>> http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/fedora/epel/8/Everything/\$arch
>> koji add-external-repo -t centos-8-build -p 11
>> centos-8-external-appstream
>> http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/CentOS/8/AppStream/\$arch/os
>> koji add-external-repo -t centos-8-build -p 12
>> centos-8-external-powertools
>> http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/CentOS/8/PowerTools/\$arch/os
>> koji add-external-repo -t centos-8-build -p 13 centos-8-external-extras
>> http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/CentOS/8/extras/\$arch/os
>>
>> koji add-target centos-8 centos-8-build
>>
>> koji add-group-pkg centos-8-build build bash bash bzip2 coreutils cpio
>> diffutils findutils gawk gcc grep sed gcc-c++ gzip info patch
>> redhat-rpm-config rpm-build shadow-utils tar unzip util-linux which make
>> centos-release xz
>> koji add-group-pkg centos-8-build srpm-build bash redhat-release
>> centos-release make redhat-rpm-config rpm-build shadow-utils wget
>> rpmdevtools
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Didier (tartare)
>> ___
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives: 
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
-- 
Didier FABERT
didier.fab...@gmail.com
TZ Europe/Paris
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

modular and personal koji

2020-07-06 Thread Didier Fabert 
Hi all,

With my personal koji (on el8), I cannot build some packages for my el8
tag. All failures are about modular metadata packages which cannot be
installed.

DEBUG util.py:621:  No available modular metadata for modular package
'httpd-2.4.37-21.module_el8.2.0+382+15b0afa8.x86_64', it cannot be
installed on the system
DEBUG util.py:621:  No available modular metadata for modular package
'httpd-devel-2.4.37-21.module_el8.2.0+382+15b0afa8.x86_64', it cannot be
installed on the system
DEBUG util.py:621:  No available modular metadata for modular package
'httpd-filesystem-2.4.37-21.module_el8.2.0+382+15b0afa8.noarch', it
cannot be installed on the system
DEBUG util.py:621:  No available modular metadata for modular package
'httpd-tools-2.4.37-21.module_el8.2.0+382+15b0afa8.x86_64', it cannot be
installed on the system
DEBUG util.py:621:  No available modular metadata for modular package
'mod_http2-1.11.3-3.module_el8.2.0+307+4d18d695.x86_64', it cannot be
installed on the system
DEBUG util.py:621:  No available modular metadata for modular package
'mysql-common-8.0.17-3.module_el8.0.0+181+899d6349.x86_64', it cannot be
installed on the system
DEBUG util.py:621:  No available modular metadata for modular package
'mysql-devel-8.0.17-3.module_el8.0.0+181+899d6349.x86_64', it cannot be
installed on the system
DEBUG util.py:621:  No available modular metadata for modular package
'mysql-libs-8.0.17-3.module_el8.0.0+181+899d6349.x86_64', it cannot be
installed on the system

Any idea to solve this problem ? I miss somthing ?

I setup my el8 tag like this

koji add-tag centos-8
koji add-tag --parent "centos-8" --arches 'x86_64' centos-8-build
koji add-group centos-8-build build
koji add-group centos-8-build srpm-build

koji add-external-repo -t centos-8-build -p 10 centos-8-external-baseos
http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/CentOS/8/BaseOS/\$arch/os
koji add-external-repo -t centos-8-build -p 15 centos-8-external-epel
http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/fedora/epel/8/Everything/\$arch
koji add-external-repo -t centos-8-build -p 11
centos-8-external-appstream
http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/CentOS/8/AppStream/\$arch/os
koji add-external-repo -t centos-8-build -p 12
centos-8-external-powertools
http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/CentOS/8/PowerTools/\$arch/os
koji add-external-repo -t centos-8-build -p 13 centos-8-external-extras
http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/CentOS/8/extras/\$arch/os

koji add-target centos-8 centos-8-build

koji add-group-pkg centos-8-build build bash bash bzip2 coreutils cpio
diffutils findutils gawk gcc grep sed gcc-c++ gzip info patch
redhat-rpm-config rpm-build shadow-utils tar unzip util-linux which make
centos-release xz
koji add-group-pkg centos-8-build srpm-build bash redhat-release
centos-release make redhat-rpm-config rpm-build shadow-utils wget
rpmdevtools

Thanks,

Didier (tartare)


pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaning a bunch of my packages (part 1 of X)

2020-06-05 Thread Didier Fabert 
Hi,

I'm taking cmatrix, thank you Raphael

Regards,

Didier.

Le 04/06/2020 à 20:02, Raphael Groner a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> src.fedoraproject.org tells me I'm involved in exactly 100 packages at the 
> moment. Therefore I decided to orphan at least a bunch of them or drop 
> membership as co-maintainer, because I'm running out of time to actively 
> maintain all of them. Most of those packages didn't get updates in the recent 
> times or have stalled upstreams.
> 
> Thanks for the great experience and the fun in the last years. Please feel 
> free to pick those packages if you still think there of any usefulness in 
> Fedora.
> 
> Regards,
> Raphael
> 
>  rpms/amqp
>  rpms/cmatrix
>  rpms/csvdiff
>  rpms/ecryptfs-utils
>  rpms/jp2a
>  rpms/json-table
>  rpms/libsysstat
>  rpms/mockito
> 
> LXQt as a general project:
>  rpms/featherpad
>  rpms/libfm-qt
>  rpms/liblxqt
>  rpms/liblxqt-mount
>  rpms/light-locker
>  rpms/lximage-qt
>  rpms/lxmenu-data
>  rpms/lxqt-about
>  rpms/lxqt-admin
>  rpms/lxqt-build-tools
>  rpms/lxqt-common
>  rpms/lxqt-config
>  rpms/lxqt-config-randr
>  rpms/lxqt-globalkeys
>  rpms/lxqt-l10n
>  rpms/lxqt-notificationd
>  rpms/lxqt-openssh-askpass
>  rpms/lxqt-panel
>  rpms/lxqt-policykit
>  rpms/lxqt-powermanagement
>  rpms/lxqt-qtplugin
>  rpms/lxqt-runner
>  rpms/lxqt-session
>  rpms/lxqt-sudo
>  rpms/lxqt-themes
>  rpms/lxqt-wallet
>  rpms/nm-tray
>  rpms/obconf-qt
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 


pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: glances

2020-05-27 Thread Didier Fabert 
Hi,

If you just need to install glances, you can use my copr:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/tartare/glances/ which have an
up to date version for fedora, el7 and el8.

Cheers,

Didier.

Le 26/05/2020 à 16:43, Breno Brand Fernandes a écrit :
> I also had filed this ticket, back in Oct/2019 asking the EL8 build.
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763319
> 
> On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 14:26, Richard Shaw  > wrote:
> 
> I did a local update and tested it, being innocuous enough I went
> and and updated and am performing builds now. Hopefully madko will
> show back up at some point. 
> 
> I also did a local build for EPEL 8 but it needs two python
> packages: psutil & future
> 
> Both built fine from Fedora master so when I get a minute I may file
> bugs to request EPEL 8 branches.
> 
> Thanks,
> Richard
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
> 
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 


pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Using fedora-active-user: unable to find fedora_cert

2019-05-30 Thread Didier Fabert 

Hi Ankur,

You have to create a directory and download one file to get script working.
In the same directory of fedora-active-user.py

mkdir fedora_cert
curl -fsSL -o fedora_cert/__init__.py 
https://pagure.io/fedora-packager/raw/master/f/src/fedora_cert/__init__.py


I modify a little this script and send pypingou a PR[1]

Cheers,

Didier.

[1] https://github.com/pypingou/fedora-active-user/pull/13

Le 30/05/2019 à 11:24, Ankur Sinha a écrit :

Hello,

Could someone please clarify how fedora-active-user[1] is to be used? It
is unable to find the fedora_cert python bits, and fedora-packager no
longer seems to include this either[2].

[1] https://github.com/pypingou/fedora-active-user
[2] 
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-packager/blob/master/f/fedora-packager.spec#_78


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

unresponsive maintainer madko

2019-05-25 Thread Didier Fabert 

Hi,

I try to contact Edouard Bourguignon (FAS: madko) in order to get 
glances updated but no response was received since two weeks.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708883

Is anybody knows how to contact him by other way ?

fedora_active_user:

Last login in FAS:
   madko 2018-10-28
Last action on koji:
   Fri, 11 Aug 2017 package list entry created: darktable in f26 by pkgdb
Last package update on bodhi:
   2018-10-16 18:52:18 on package glances-3.0.2-1.fc29
Last actions performed according to fedmsg:
  - didier.fab...@gmail.com updated nothing on RHBZ#1708883 'Update 
glances for fedora to 3.1.0' on 2019-05-25 12:30:46
  - didier.fab...@gmail.com updated nothing on RHBZ#1708883 'Update 
glances for fedora to 3.1.0' on 2019-05-21 12:27:21
  - bi...@bigon.be updated 'cc' on RHBZ#1691446 'Google Photos export 
module is broken' on 2019-05-19 12:29:24
  - didier.fab...@gmail.com updated nothing on RHBZ#1708883 'Update 
glances for fedora to 3.1.0' on 2019-05-11 13:32:48
  - ma...@linuxed.net updated 'cc' on RHBZ#1653026 'lock screen does 
not turn off display on...' on 2019-05-06 17:33:39
  - quantum.anal...@gmail.com updated 'cc' on RHBZ#1636089 'Version 
3.0.2 is available.' on 2019-05-03 09:25:15
  - steevit...@gmail.com updated nothing on RHBZ#1694507 
'darktable-tools-noise RPM package has br...' on 2019-04-01 01:52:42
  - dmitryburst...@netscape.net updated nothing on RHBZ#1691446 'Google 
Photos export module is broken' on 2019-03-21 16:47:22
  - ma...@linuxed.net updated 'cc' on RHBZ#1688146 '[abrt] tpm2-abrmd: 
init_thread_func(): t...' on 2019-03-16 19:56:04
  - cy...@cyplo.net updated nothing on RHBZ#1689577 '[abrt] glances: 
update(): glances_networ...' on 2019-03-16 19:33:32

Last email on archived mailing list:
  - devel@lists.fedoraproject.org: 6 years, 2 months
  - us...@lists.fedoraproject.org: No activity found
  - freeipa-us...@lists.fedorahosted.org: No activity found
  - infrastruct...@lists.fedoraproject.org: No activity found
  - t...@lists.fedoraproject.org: 7 years, 2 months
  - magaz...@lists.fedoraproject.org: No activity found
  - tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org: No activity found
  - k...@lists.fedoraproject.org: No activity found
  - epel-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org: 6 years, 9 months
  - sssd-us...@lists.fedorahosted.org: No activity found
Bugzilla activity
   20 bugs assigned, cc or on which ma...@linuxed.net(201349) commented
   Last comment on the most recent ticket on bugzilla:
  #1575301 2018-10-27 madko
  #1520740 2019-04-10 madko
  #1435227 2017-06-14 madko

Edouard is the only maintainer for glances[1], and if he have no time to 
update it, I'll be happy to become the maintainer.


Best Regards,

Didier.

-
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/glances
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: mflobo

2019-05-22 Thread Didier Fabert 

Hi,

It's a little off topic, but where your fedora_active_user.py script 
come from ?


I have the same problem and according to the 
Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers[1], the "official" repo is 
on github[2].


I cannot run successfully this script with python2 or python3,and with 
the latest fedora_cert[3] lib.



[1] 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/

[2] https://github.com/pypingou/fedora-active-user
[3] https://pagure.io/fedora-packager/blob/master/f/src/fedora_cert

Le 21/05/2019 à 15:13, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso a écrit :

Hello,

I've been trying to contact mflobo in order to get some packages updated 
but didn't get any response:


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711394
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711395

Output of fedora_active_user.py:

Last login in FAS:
    mflobo 2017-02-23
Last action on koji:
    Tue, 15 Jan 2019 package list entry revoked: python-muranoclient in 
trashcan by oscar

Last package update on bodhi:
    2016-04-15 15:26:46 on package python-muranoclient-0.8.4-1.fc24
Last actions performed according to fedmsg:
   - amora...@redhat.com  updated nothing on 
RHBZ#1711395 'Update to latest release upstream 1.12.0' on 2019-05-17 
18:58:33 ()
   - amora...@redhat.com  updated nothing on 
RHBZ#1711394 'Update to latest released upstream 3.8.0' on 2019-05-17 
18:55:32 ()
   - upstream-release-monitoring updated 'short_desc' on RHBZ#1445107 
'python-mistralclient-3.9.0 is available' on 2019-05-16 11:14:55 ()
   - upstream-release-monitoring updated 'short_desc' on RHBZ#1445107 
'python-mistralclient-3.8.1 is available' on 2019-05-14 17:11:52 ()
   - upstream-release-monitoring updated 'short_desc' on RHBZ#1445107 
'python-mistralclient-3.8.0 is available' on 2019-03-08 22:12:32 ()
   - zbys...@in.waw.pl  updated 'bug_status', 
'cf_fixed_in', and 'resolution' on RHBZ#1579356 'python-mistralclient 
has no dist tag' on 2019-02-15 18:02:32 ()
   - mhron...@redhat.com  updated 
'bug_status', 'flag.needinfo', and 'resolution' on RHBZ#1560485 
'python-muranoclient: Switch to Python 3 ...' on 2019-01-09 15:27:54 ()
   - mhron...@redhat.com  updated 
'flag.needinfo' on RHBZ#1560485 'python-muranoclient: Switch to Python 3 
...' on 2019-01-09 15:27:53 ()
   - mhron...@redhat.com  updated 'status', 
'cf_fixed_in', 'resolution', and 'cf_last_closed' on RHBZ#1649010 
'python-vitrageclient: Remove (sub)packag...' on 2018-11-19 14:36:19 ()
   - mhron...@redhat.com  updated 'status' 
and 'assigned_to' on RHBZ#1649010 'python-vitrageclient: Remove 
(sub)packag...' on 2018-11-19 14:29:14 ()



According to https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/mflobo he's the only 
maintainer for python-mistralclient, python-congressclient and 
python-yaql. As these three are somehow related to OpenStack packages, 
i'd be happy to take them as maintainer.


Best regards,

Alfredo

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

frozen approved review

2019-03-17 Thread Didier Fabert 

Hi all,

My package was reviewed and accepted[1], but the ticket is frozen since 
a week now. What is the next step ?
I find nothing about this in package review process[2], or 
packaging-guidelines[3].


Thanks for your reply.
Regards,

Didier.

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684719
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
[3] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Looking for volunteers for a handful of Go package reviews

2019-03-05 Thread Didier Fabert 
Hi,

golang-github-anacrolix-envpprof is done
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684936)

Is there a package which is blocking all others ? I have some time to do
review

Didier.

Le 04/03/2019 à 02:05, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I have several Go packages in need of a review for the latest Rclone version.
> I'm available for any review in exchange.
>
> - golang-github-anacrolix-dms
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684956
>
> - golang-github-anacrolix-ffprobe
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684950
> 
> - golang-github-anacrolix-envpprof
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684936
> 
> - golang-github-anacrolix-missinggo
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684940
> 
> - golang-github-RoaringBitmap-roaring
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684934
> 
> - golang-github-glycerine-go-unsnap-stream
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684906
> 
> - golang-github-mschoch-smat
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684924
> 
> - golang-github-tinylib-msgp
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684919
> 
> - golang-github-philhofer-fwd
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684908
> 
> - golang-github-ttacon-chalk
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684909
> 
> - golang-github-willf-bitset
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684925
> 
> - golang-github-anacrolix-tagflag
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684948
> 
> - golang-github-bradfitz-iter
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684933
> 
> - golang-github-docopt
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684938
> 
> - golang-github-huandu-xstrings
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684929
> 
> - golang-github-ryszard-goskiplist
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684927
>
> Thanks to all!
>
> Robert-André
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

2019-03-01 Thread Didier Fabert 
Hi,

Last metadata expiration check: 0:05:26 ago on Fri Mar  1 12:17:22 2019.
Error:
Problem 1: package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch requires
system-release(29), but none of the providers can be installed
  - fedora-release-29-7.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch
Problem 2: package vlc-core-1:3.0.6-16.fc29.x86_64 requires
libprotobuf-lite.so.15()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - protobuf-lite-3.5.0-8.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
  - problem with installed package vlc-core-1:3.0.6-16.fc29.x86_64
Problem 3: package whois-mkpasswd-5.4.1-1.fc29.x86_64 requires whois-nls
= 5.4.1-1.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed
  - whois-nls-5.4.1-1.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
  - problem with installed package whois-mkpasswd-5.4.1-1.fc29.x86_64
Problem 4: package fedora-release-29-7.noarch requires fedora-repos(29)
>= 1, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-29-1.noarch requires
system-release(29), but none of the providers can be installed
  - fedora-repos-29-3.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-29-1.noarch

Best regards

Didier.

Le 28/02/2019 à 10:22, Miroslav Suchý a écrit :
> Do you want to make Fedora 30 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and 
> try to run:
>
>   sudo dnf --releasever=30 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 
> --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
>
> If you get this prompt:
>
>   ...
>   Total download size: XXX M
>   Is this ok [y/N]:
>
> you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the real upgrade. 
> Upgrades will be fine for you.
>
> But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case please 
> report it against appropriate package.
>
> Thank you
>
> Miroslav
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Koji build: cannot find spec file

2018-03-30 Thread Didier Fabert 
Hi folks,

Can you explain your patch, I have a personal build system on centos 7
which is broken since last koji upgrade (1.14 -> 1.15)

Thanks in advance,

Didier.


Le 18/02/2018 à 13:18, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk a écrit :
>> On 02/17/2018 08:22 PM, Jerry James wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, it's still broken. I looked at it a bit but couldn't see what the
>> exact cause of the breakage is. ;(
>>
>> If we cannot get it fixed by tomorrow morning, I'll revert us back to
>> the older koji version. ;(
> We have found and fixed the issue with koji 1.15.0, and patched the build 
> system.
> Builds should be working as of now again.
>
>> Sorry for the hassles.
>>
>> kevin
> Thanks for your patience,
> Patrick
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Koji error after upgrade

2017-04-28 Thread Didier Fabert 
Hi all,

After update my koji server (from1.10.0-3 to 1.11.0-5), I encoured an error 
when I'm try to regenerate repos. All regen tasks failed with this error:

TypeError: Can not create dirnames index: disk I/O error

Just after the update, I'm ran  upgrade script, but it failed
psql koji koji < /usr/share/doc/koji-1.11.0/docs/schema-upgrade-1.10-1.11.sql

So I'm ran this others scripts
psql koji koji < /usr/share/doc/koji-1.11.0/docs/schema-update-cgen.sql 
psql koji koji < /usr/share/doc/koji-1.11.0/docs/schema-update-cgen2.sql
and then 
psql koji koji < /usr/share/doc/koji-1.11.0/docs/schema-upgrade-1.10-1.11.sql

Where is the error ?

Cheers,

Didier.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Copr f26 with pkgconfig

2017-02-04 Thread Didier Fabert 
Thank you clime.

2017-02-03 21:27 GMT+01:00 Michal Novotny <cl...@redhat.com>:

> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Didier Fabert <didier.fab...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I'm unable to build netdata package for f26 on copr. The error, in file
>> root.log.gz, was about pkgconfig:
>> > Error: package pkgconf-pkg-config-1.2.1-1.fc26.x86_64 conflicts with
>> pkgconfig < 1:0.29.1-2 provided by pkgconfig-1:0.29.1-1.fc25.x86_64
>>
>> Yes, pkgconfig is explicitly mark as BuildRequires.
>>
>> Does anybody have an idea to solve this problem ?
>>
>> Full logs are https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/tartare/
>> netdata/
>> fedora-26-x86_64/00506909-netdata/
>> <https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/tartare/netdata/%0Afedora-26-x86_64/00506909-netdata/>
>>
>>
> This problem is related to: *Bug 1096506*
> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096506> and was fixed in 
> dnf-1.1.10-3.
> On
> copr builders, there is currently dnf-1.1.9-2. I already submitted a patch
> to
> ensure dnf is latest on builders but it will take a while to take effect.
> I
> will contact you as soon as the problem is resolved so that you can retry
> your build.
>
> clime
>
> P.S.: I also made this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
> show_bug.cgi?id=1419185
> that you can follow
>
>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Didier.
>> ___
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
>
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>


-- 
Didier FABERT
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Copr f26 with pkgconfig

2017-02-03 Thread Didier Fabert 
Hi there,

I'm unable to build netdata package for f26 on copr. The error, in file 
root.log.gz, was about pkgconfig:
> Error: package pkgconf-pkg-config-1.2.1-1.fc26.x86_64 conflicts with 
pkgconfig < 1:0.29.1-2 provided by pkgconfig-1:0.29.1-1.fc25.x86_64

Yes, pkgconfig is explicitly mark as BuildRequires.

Does anybody have an idea to solve this problem ?

Full logs are https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/tartare/netdata/
fedora-26-x86_64/00506909-netdata/

Sincerely,

Didier.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-04-09)

2016-04-13 Thread Didier FABERT 
Thanks Pierre-Yves
tsung and verbiste taken

Le mercredi 13 avril 2016, 10:46:14 Pierre-Yves Chibon a écrit :
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:24:41AM +0200, Didier FABERT wrote:
> > I want to take tsung and verbiste packages but I have not idea how to do
> > it
> > except contact cicku (package admin) directly. Is it the correct way ?
> 
> Simply visit pkgdb:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/verbiste/ (for verbiste),
> login and click on the 'Take Package' button, same for tsung
> 
> > Le samedi 9 avril 2016, 15:18:51 opensou...@till.name a écrit :
> > > tsungorphan, cicku, erlang-sig,   6 weeks
> > > ago
> > > 
> > >  peter
> > > 
> > > verbiste orphan, cicku, icon  6 weeks
> > > ago
> 
> Pierre
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-04-09)

2016-04-13 Thread Didier FABERT 
Hi,

I want to take tsung and verbiste packages but I have not idea how to do it 
except contact cicku (package admin) directly. Is it the correct way ?

Didier.

Le samedi 9 avril 2016, 15:18:51 opensou...@till.name a écrit :
> tsungorphan, cicku, erlang-sig,   6 weeks ago
>  peter
> verbiste orphan, cicku, icon  6 weeks ago
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Self introduction: Didier Fabert

2014-05-27 Thread Didier Fabert 
On Sunday 25 May 2014 10:51:22 Lubomir Rintel wrote:
  For people who have searching for fedora  packages about povray tools
  (like arbaro, fracplanet, geomorph, ngplant, povtree), I have a
  repository for building such tools: https://github.com/didier13150/rpm
 
 You're welcome to bring this packages into the distribution repository.
The first review about geomorph: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101521

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Self introduction: Didier Fabert

2014-05-24 Thread Didier Fabert 
Hi all,

My name is Didier Fabert (FAS: tartare). I'm a long-time user of Fedora, 
CentOS. I'm 
sysadmin, and that's why I'm building some packages for a long time with mock 
(fedora) and in our personal Koji (for el5 6 7).

For people who have searching for fedora  packages about povray tools (like 
arbaro, 
fracplanet, geomorph, ngplant, povtree), I have a repository for building such 
tools: 
https://github.com/didier13150/rpm

I'm curently working on packaging modoboa (http://modoboa.org/en/), a mail 
hosting and management platform. But I'm not ready to fill my first review 
request 
yet.

I will need a sponsor (preferably who speak french like me because my english 
is not 
perfect)

Cheers,

Didier.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct