Re: Orphaning some packages
On Fri, 2022-07-08 at 17:38 +0100, Christopher Brown wrote: > stress-ng I'll be happy taking over stress-ng. Regards, Dominic ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Geany Plugins build fails due to missing webkigtk4 on aarch64/s390x - Need support
Thanks very much for pointing that out! I'm not sure if it's really a big problem if the whole geany-plugins stuff will not be available on aarch64 and s390x, though. Unfortunately I was unable to apply that %ifnarch properly off the cuff. I guess I will have to dive even deeper into that topic in the next few days. Regards, Dominic On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 10:43 PM Scott Talbert wrote: > On Wed, 8 Apr 2020, Dominic Hopf via devel wrote: > > > Thanks very much for your help Scott and Michael! > > I now did both, changed the requirement to webkit2gtk3-devel and as > this one > > is also not available on the mentioned architectures, > > excluded those architectures using ExcludeArch for this specific > subpackage. > > > > The package built fine now without any errors. :-) > > > > Thanks very much and Best Regards, > > Take care of yourself within these strange times! > > I don't think that's quite what happened though. It looks like there were > no builds done at all for s390x and aarch64. It seems that ExcludeArch > applies to the whole package and not a subpackage. If you want to just > exclude a subpackage, you need to use %ifnarch, see: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wxGTK3/blob/epel8/f/wxGTK3.spec#_46 > > Scott > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Geany Plugins build fails due to missing webkigtk4 on aarch64/s390x - Need support
Thanks very much for your help Scott and Michael!
I now did both, changed the requirement to webkit2gtk3-devel and as
this one is also not available on the mentioned architectures,
excluded those architectures using ExcludeArch for this specific subpackage.
The package built fine now without any errors. :-)
Thanks very much and Best Regards,
Take care of yourself within these strange times!
Dominic
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 10:04 PM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 9:18 pm, Dominic Hopf via devel
> wrote:
> > ```
> > %if 0%{?rhel}
> > BuildRequires: webkitgtk4-devel
> > %else
> > BuildRequires: webkit2gtk3-devel
> > %endif
> > ```
>
> FYI: this package was renamed for RHEL 8. webkitgtk4 is the RHEL 7
> package. webkit2gtk3 is the equivalent RHEL 8 package. Exact same
> thing, less-confusing name.
>
> So there is no webkitgtk4 in RHEL 8. If webkitgtk4-devel is present in
> the buildroot allowing the build to succeed on any architecture, I
> guess something is wrong with the buildroot.
>
>
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Geany Plugins build fails due to missing webkigtk4 on aarch64/s390x - Need support
Greetings,
I'm trying to build Geany and the Geany Plugins for EPEL8 currently and
stumble over an issue which seems to be
quite special in some kind for aarch64 and s390x:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43133907
Basically I merged the epel7 branch into the epel8 branch for that build,
the geany-plugins-markdown plugin required webkitgtk4-devel so far:
```
%if 0%{?rhel}
BuildRequires: webkitgtk4-devel
%else
BuildRequires: webkit2gtk3-devel
%endif
```
I'm a bit confused and unsure how to proceed further as the build obviously
worked fine for ppc64le and x86_64.
Thanks very much for any advise how to solve this issue.
Regards,
Dominic
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Libravatar shutting down on 2018-09-01 - Are we aware of that already?
Greetings, I was stumbling over this as I was wondering where my Avatar went on src.fedoraproject.org… However, long story short: The guys of Libravatar are intending to shut down their services on 2018-09-01. More information can be found here: https://blog.libravatar.org/posts/Libravatar.org_is_shutting_down_on_20 18-09-01/ Is Fedora (most likely the infrastructure team?) aware of that already? Are we going to run our own service for that? Would it be a great idea to probably suggest the guys that Fedora is kind of taking over the service under libravatar.org and continue running it? Thanks for any answers or proposals on that topic & Regards, Dominic signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/35SHP6F7SXYMYACRHCVO37XGYWQCPVRL/
Small issues in the Packaging:Perl Wiki Page
Greetings, I've noticed two small issues in the Packaging:Perl wiki page here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl They're both quite at the bottom of the list, thus it's useful to scroll down on that page before reading further. * one thing is, that the link to this mailing list actually doesn't work anymore * the other thing is that the code block for the PERL5_CPANPLUS_IS_RUNNING stuff is in the wrong paragraph I unfortunately am not able to fix this myself because of some permission issues. The message was: /quote You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason: The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Packaging. quote/ Actually, I am packaging stuff for Fedora but I'm new to also build Perl packages. Not sure what exactly is missing here. Regards, Dominic ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Orphaning packages
On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 10:53 -0700, Susi Lehtola wrote: noip pdfchain I have taken those two. Co-Maintainers welcome. :) Best Regards, Dominic -- Dominic Hopf http://dominichopf.de/ Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Koji EPEL 6 building issue: warning: %post(shared-mime-info-0.70-4.el6.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 127
Greetings, I'm having an issue when trying to build a package for EPEL6, see the root.log here: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3518/7083518/root.log Any ideas if i'm doing something wrong or if this is a serious issue? Regards, Dominic -- Diese E-Mail ist nicht mit GPG signiert, da ich sie vom Webinterface aus geschrieben habe. This mail is not signed with GPG because I wrote it from web interface. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Koji EPEL 6 building issue: warning: %post(shared-mime-info-0.70-4.el6.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 127
2014-06-27 16:45 GMT+02:00 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com: Does koji use state plugin? If yes, it must be disabled: /etc/mock/site-defaults.cfg config_opts['plugin_conf']['package_state_enable'] = False Because state plugin require yum-utils-1.1.31 which are not in el6. Not sure about this, it's the usual koji running at koji.fedoraproject.org. I removed the # at the beginning of this line in /etc/mock/site-defaults.cfg: config_opts['plugin_conf']['package_state_enable'] = False But that didn't fix the issue, unfortunately. Regards, Dominic -- Diese E-Mail ist nicht mit GPG signiert, da ich sie vom Webinterface aus geschrieben habe. This mail is not signed with GPG because I wrote it from web interface. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Is redis orphaned?
It obviously has an owner: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/redis/ You'd possibly request co-maintainership then… Regards, Dominic 2014-05-27 17:03 GMT+02:00 Jeff Schroeder jeffschroe...@computer.org: This makes me think it is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976554 For a package as oft used in traditional LAMP stacks as a fantastic cache or queue, shouldn't we fix this? I'm happy to work on an updated spec / src.rpm, but am not a packager let along a prove packager. Any advice on what to do here? -- Text by Jeff, typos by iPhone -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- Diese E-Mail ist nicht mit GPG signiert, da ich sie vom Webinterface aus geschrieben habe. This mail is not signed with GPG because I wrote it from web interface. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Orphaning some packages
On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 14:55 +0200, Ruben Kerkhof wrote: mysql-proxy I'd take that one. Best Regards, Dominic -- Dominic Hopf http://dominichopf.de/ Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Help with packaging openEMR
Am Samstag, den 28.05.2011, 16:44 +0530 schrieb Ankur Sinha:
Hi folks,
I was packaging openEMR. This is what the INSTALL file says:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-medical/ticket/4
Copy the OpenEMR folder into the root folder of the webserver. On Mandrake
Linux, for example, use the command:
bash# mv openemr /var/www/html/
Make sure the webserver is running, and point a web-browser to setup.php
located
within the openemr web folder. If you installed OpenEMR in the root web
directory, the URL would read: http://localhost/openemr/setup.php.
The setup script will step you through the configuration of the OpenEMR.
During the packaging, do I place the files in the /var/www/html/ dir, or
should I place them all in %{_datadir} and add a README.fedora which
tells the user to copy it there etc?
If there's a package like this already, please point me to it.
Maybe have a look as w3c-markup-validator or phpMyAdmin as examples for
web based software. As far as I can see, the idea is, to put software
where it belongs to (%{_datadir}) and add a file to the web server
configuration (i.e. Apache in /etc/httpd/conf.d/) which is pointing to
the software via the Alias directive.
Hope this helps :)
Regards,
Dominic
--
Dominic Hopf dma...@googlemail.com
http://dominichopf.de/
Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Question of forbiddeness: rippit
Am Samstag, den 26.03.2011, 22:09 -0400 schrieb Trever Fischer: Howdy, all. As a weekend project, I created 'rippit', a super simple no-frills command line CD ripper. It aims to take zero parameters and produce lossless rips in .flac format, properly tagged with musicbrainz, etc. In the future, I plan on extending it to also rip DVDs in the same fashion. i.e. type 'rippit' and it finds your DVD drive and starts ripping the video to some free format like mkv, theora, or somesuch. Haven't decided yet.. Rippit is built entirely using gstreamer packages that are available in Fedora. When I add DVD support, I plan on making the relevant non-free decoders and elements accessible via rpmfusion.org a pure runtime dependency. No linking, no failure to compile, etc. As such, it doesn't directly do anything more than what you can do via gst-launch. The issue I see here is, that you most likely can not have a package in Fedora which has one as dependency (explicitly defined via Requires) which resides in a completely other repository. I guess it isn't a problem as long as you don't have such Requires, but that might cause your program to not work correctly or limits the functionality of your program (in case the required packages from rpmfusion are not installed). The logical consequence of this would be to include it directly into rpmfusion, wouldn't it? Regards, Dominic -- Dominic Hopf dma...@googlemail.com http://dominichopf.de/ Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Orphaning some packages
Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2011, 11:04 -0400 schrieb Brian Pepple: * meld * tagtool I've taken these two. Co-Maintainers welcome. :) -- Dominic Hopf dma...@googlemail.com http://dominichopf.de/ Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Orphaning some packages
Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2011, 23:31 +0530 schrieb Ankur Sinha: On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 16:41 +0100, Dominic Hopf wrote: Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2011, 11:04 -0400 schrieb Brian Pepple: * meld * tagtool I've taken these two. Co-Maintainers welcome. :) Hey! I'd like to help co-maintain tagtool. I use it regularly :) Should I apply? Yeah, just request the Co-Maintainership in pkgdb, I'll approve the requests then. :) Regards, Dominic -- Dominic Hopf dma...@googlemail.com http://dominichopf.de/ Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Orphaning some packages
Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2011, 17:21 +0100 schrieb Christoph Wickert: * tagtool Seems to be dead, at least the homepage disappeared. Well, that actually seems to be right, but maybe could be updated to http://sourceforge.net/projects/tagtool/, though. But even with that, upstream doesn't seem to be that active at present, unfortunately. :( Anyway, I still find it the best tool for editing MP3 tags around, so, is there any reason to not maintain it anymore from Fedora's point of view? Regards, Dominic -- Dominic Hopf dma...@googlemail.com http://dominichopf.de/ Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: installation of my own rpm in a Fedora without internet
Am Samstag, den 19.02.2011, 11:44 -0300 schrieb Domingo Becker: I was in a situation a couple of days ago, in which I was setting up some Fedora 14 desktops and I tried to install my software from rpms in an usb stick. For some external reason, the internet connection was down, and after installing F14, setting up the appropriate firewall rules and selinux booleans and file contexts, I tried to install my software from the rpms and it failed because it couldn't get information about the Fedora repo. I think that a just installed Fedora box should have the ability to install software from an usb stick without the need of an internet connection. Think about a computer with F14 for managing something in a place without internet connection (I have several cases like this). Is there a way to do this? I usually do this with yum localinstall file.rpm Regards, Dominic -- Dominic Hopf dma...@googlemail.com http://dominichopf.de/ Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide
amarok requires libtag.so.1 amarok-libs requires libtag.so.1 amarok-utils requires libtag.so.1 audacity requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 bangarang requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 bangarang requires libtag.so.1 clementine requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 clementine requires libtag.so.1 ezstream requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 ezstream requires libtag_c.so.0 gimmix requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 gimmix requires libtag_c.so.0 gimmix requires libtag.so.1 gloobus-preview requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 gloobus-preview requires libtag.so.1 gmediaserver requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 gmediaserver requires libtag_c.so.0 gmediaserver requires libtag.so.1 gmpc requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 gmpc requires libtag_c.so.0 gmpc requires libtag.so.1 gnomad2 requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 gnomad2 requires libtag_c.so.0 gnome-commander requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 gnome-commander requires libtag.so.1 gstreamer-plugins-good requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 gstreamer-plugins-good requires libtag.so.1 k3b requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 k3b requires libtag.so.1 kaudiocreator requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 kaudiocreator requires libtag.so.1 kdemultimedia requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 kdemultimedia requires libtag.so.1 kid3 requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 kid3 requires libtag.so.1 kid3-qt requires libtag.so.1 krename requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 krename requires libtag.so.1 ktorrent requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 ktorrent requires libtag.so.1 liblicense requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 liblicense-modules requires libtag.so.1 libtunepimp requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 libtunepimp requires libtag.so.1 mediatomb requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 mediatomb requires libtag.so.1 minitunes requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 minitunes requires libtag.so.1 ncmpcpp requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 ncmpcpp requires libtag.so.1 parole requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 parole requires libtag_c.so.0 parole-mozplugin requires libtag_c.so.0 phoronix-test-suite requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 pinot requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 pinot requires libtag.so.1 python-tag requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 python-tag requires libtag.so.1 qmmp requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 qmmp requires libtag.so.1 ruby-taglib requires taglib = 1.6.3-1.fc13 taginfo requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 taginfo requires libtag.so.1 taglib-extras requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 taglib-extras requires libtag.so.1 taglib-extras requires taglib(x86-32) = 1.6.3-1.fc13 taglib-extras-devel requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 tellico requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 tellico requires libtag.so.1 tepsonic requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 tepsonic requires libtag.so.1 thunar-media-tags-plugin requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 thunar-media-tags-plugin requires libtag_c.so.0 thunar-media-tags-plugin requires libtag.so.1 tracker requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 tracker requires libtag_c.so.0 tracker requires libtag.so.1 xmms-musepack requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 xmms-musepack requires libtag.so.1 xmms-scrobbler requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 xmms-scrobbler requires libtag_c.so.0 xmms-scrobbler requires libtag.so.1 xnoise requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 xnoise requires libtag_c.so.0 xnoise requires libtag.so.1 xnoise-devel requires pkgconfig(taglib_c) = 1.6.3 xnoise-plugins-core requires taglib-devel = 1.6.3-1.fc13 xnoise-plugins-core requires libtag_c.so.0 xnoise-plugins-core requires libtag.so.1 Orphan: tetex-tex4ht dbus-java requires tetex-tex4ht = 1.0.2008_09_16_1413-3.fc12 freecol requires tetex-tex4ht = 1.0.2008_09_16_1413-3.fc12 python-cvxopt requires tetex-tex4ht = 1.0.2008_09_16_1413-3.fc12 texi2html requires tetex-tex4ht = 1.0.2008_09_16_1413-3.fc12 Orphan: tigase-utils tigase-server requires tigase-utils = 3.3.10-1.fc15 Orphan: tigase-xmltools tigase-server requires tigase-xmltools = 3.3.5-1.fc15 tigase-utils requires tigase-xmltools = 3.3.5-1.fc15 Orphan: tla buildbot requires tla = 1.3.5-8.fc12 git-arch requires tla = 1.3.5-8.fc12 perl-Test-AutoBuild requires tla = 1.3.5-8.fc12 perl-Test-AutoBuild-tla requires tla = 1.3.5-8.fc12 python-vcpx requires tla = 1.3.5-8.fc12 The script that generated this page can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/browser/scripts/find-unblocked-orphans.py There you can also report bugs and RFEs. I'll be glad to maintain ncmpcpp. :) -- Dominic Hopf dma
Re: Orphaning a few packages
Am Dienstag, den 07.12.2010, 13:29 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: Pdfmerge: Command line utility program for merging PDF files Took the ownership for that one. Co-Maintainers welcome. :) Regards, Dominic -- Dominic Hopf dma...@googlemail.com http://dominichopf.de/ Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fast Light Tool Kit
Am Samstag, den 30.10.2010, 21:51 -0400 schrieb Eric Sparks Christensen: On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 21:32, R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com wrote: On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Eric Sparks Christensen wrote: I found a program that I want to package but it requires Fast Light Tool Kit (FLTK). The source is a single file with no readme and I'm not exactly sure how to package the software. Has anyone worked with FLTK that might be able to help me with this? it is packaged abundantly. What is the question? fltk /mnt/nfs/var/ftp/pub/mirror/redhat/rawhide/SRPMS/fltk-1.1.10-4.fc15.src.rpm also in epel and fedora for since forever -- Russ herrold I know that FLTK is packaged. What I'm trying to figure out is how to package a program that requires FLTK to compile. I'm not familar with FLTK and the software I downloaded didn't come with any README or instructions for compiling. So I was hoping someone knew about FLTK and what I needed to do to package this software that requires FLTK to build. The source I downloaded contained a single file so I'm not sure what needs to happen. Does the software you like to package provide something like a configure script or similar? Maybe it would help if you could post a link to the software you actually like to package. I think it's likely something like a BuildRequires: fltk already should be enough. I'd suggest to just try out that and see what happens. :) Regards, Dominic -- Dominic Hopf dma...@googlemail.com http://dominichopf.de/ Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Need help for Gimp 2.7.1
Am Mittwoch, den 13.10.2010, 20:47 +0200 schrieb Valent Turkovic: On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Hello, I attempted to build a new version of Gimp 2.7.1 using Koji scratch method but ended up with that result[1]. Here is attached spec file borrowed from Nils as I wanted to experiment that version along with Design. Can anyone check what went wrong. Thanks [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2291828 Anybody tried making GIMP 2.7/2.8 packages and making them available via http://repos.fedorapeople.org/ ? I would love to test out GIMP 2.7/2.8 on Fedora but haven't seen any RPM packages made for Fedora. If anybody knows of them please send me the link. Luya actually did that: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/luya/gimp/ Seems to work fine, here. Thanks Luya. :) Regards, Dominic -- Dominic Hopf dma...@googlemail.com http://dominichopf.de/ Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: The move to git!
Am Sonntag, den 01.08.2010, 11:42 +0200 schrieb Andrea Musuruane: On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote: OK. I deleted the current repo and started again. I do have fedora-packager 0.5.1. Now fedora-packager crashes when uploading new sources. $ fedpkg clone zaz Cloning into zaz... [..] Resolving deltas: 100% (11/11), done. $ cd zaz/ $ cp -a ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/zaz-0.8.0.tar.bz2 . $ cp -a ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/zaz.spec . $ fedpkg new-sources zaz-0.8.0.tar.bz2 Uploading: 6a63f986a80b4f4e1852ecf9871e9735 zaz-0.8.0.tar.bz2 Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 959, in module args.command(args) File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 540, in new_sources mymodule.upload(args.files, replace=args.replace) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py, line 1278, in upload if lookaside.file_exists(self.module, file_basename, file_hash): File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py, line 580, in file_exists curl.perform() pycurl.error: (35, 'SSL connect error') [and...@panoramix zaz]$ I still have this error. Help is appreciated. I just yesterday had similar problems and then found out my ~/.fedora.cert was out of date since five days ago. Maybe it's the same for you, did you already had a look there? :) Best Regards, Dominic -- Dominic Hopf dma...@googlemail.com http://dominichopf.de/ Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: orphaning terminator
Am Dienstag, den 02.02.2010, 16:38 +0530 schrieb steve: On 02/02/2010 04:08 PM, steve wrote: On 02/02/2010 06:33 AM, Dominic Hopf wrote: Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 17:07 -0600 schrieb Ian Weller: I feel like I'm neglecting the terminator package because I don't have enough time to send the bugs and feature requests upstream or debug them myself. Anybody interested, give me a shout and I'll let the package go in pkgdb. I'd like to take that package! Terminator is my preferred terminal and I'd be interested in co-maintaining it if you think you might *need* help. sorry typo ^^ cheers, - steve Alright guys, I've taken the ownership. Hiemanshu and Steve, I always appreciate help, so feel free to enter your names as co-maintainers. :) Best Regards, Dominic -- Dominic Hopf dma...@googlemail.com http://dominichopf.de/ Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
