Re: ask to test latest systemd build for systemd-resolved problems

[Gerard Ryan]

> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 01:19:01AM +0000, Gerard Ryan wrote:
> 
> That's probably unrelated. This shouldn't happen, so maybe file
> a bug. Maybe it's something about systemd-networkd or NetworkManager
> not starting (whatever you use)?

I've created the following but for that one:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/19140

Thanks,
Ger.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: ask to test latest systemd build for systemd-resolved problems

[Gerard Ryan]

(resending through lists.fp.o, since I'm not actually subscribed atm, so it was 
rejected)

I was one of the people who experienced the problem with 246.12-1.fc33
on F33. With that version, I was able to resolve google.com and
fedoraproject.org just fine, but it seemed I wasn't able to resolve
most other domains that I tried (including duckduckgo.com and
redhat.com). Just highlighting that as it sounds like other folks had
issues with google.com but not other domains.

With 248~rc4.git20210326.b240c08-1.fc33 from your copr build on F33, my
wired ethernet (eno1) doesn't work, so it seems I've got other issues
with that one.

With 248~rc4.git20210326.b240c08-1.fc34 from your copr build on F34 on
that same machine (different ostree), I don't appear to have any
networking issues -- I'm able to connect to the network and resolve all
of the domains that I tried.

Let me know if you'd like me to try anything in particular in either of
those scenarios: I've got each one available as a pinned ostree
deployment in silverblue, so it's easy to get back to them.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Orphaning packages

[Gerard Ryan]

Hi all,

I no longer use the following packages nor have the time to maintain
them, so I'm going to orphan them:

- aether-connector-okhttp
- dtdparser
- eclipse-jbosstools
- eclipse-m2e-core
- eclipse-webtools
- javaewah
- jboss-classpool-scoped
- jboss-reflect
- jbossxb
- jdf-stacks-client
- jhighlight
- maven-indexer
- minimal-json
- nodejs-acorn
- nodejs-carrier
- nodejs-doctrine
- nodejs-isarray
- nodejs-tern
- nodejs-tern-cordovajs
- nodejs-tern-liferay
- nodejs-typescript
- okhttp
- openshift-java-client
- port-allocator-maven-plugin
- smooks
- takari-filemanager
- takari-local-repository
- truecommons
- truecommons-parent
- truezip
- uddi4j
- wise
- wsil4j

Thanks,
Gerard.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaning JBoss Tools package

[Gerard Ryan]

On 11/02/2015 11:49 PM, Marcus Karlsson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 03:56:15PM +0000, Gerard Ryan wrote:
>> Hi devel list (and cc'ed eclipse-sig list),
>>
>> I'm going to orphan the eclipse-jbosstools package in rawhide, as I'm no
>> longer able to give it the time that it needs. My understanding is that
>> if nobody takes it, it will be auto-retired after 6 weeks (please
>> correct me if I'm wrong here).
>>
>> If you're interested in taking it & have any questions, I'm happy to
>> provide any input I can. I think ideally it would want more than one
>> active maintainer to get it into the shape that it needs to be (not all
>> features are currently packaged, and significant effort would be
>> required there).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gerard.
> 
> Hi Gerard.
> 
> I'm interested in stepping up and maintaining this package as I
> occasionally use it and would love to see it fully supported on Fedora.
> :-)
> 
>   Marcus
> 

Hi Marcus,

That's great to hear that you're interested in it. Like you said, it
would be great to see all of it in Fedora, since it's great for the kind
of development that it targets.

Currently it doesn't build in Rawhide because of missing dependencies.
Also there's a new release that I spend a couple of weekends trying to
get to work, but eventually failed.

Have you had a chance to look at it yet and try it out?

Gerard.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Orphaning JBoss Tools package

[Gerard Ryan]

Hi devel list (and cc'ed eclipse-sig list),

I'm going to orphan the eclipse-jbosstools package in rawhide, as I'm no
longer able to give it the time that it needs. My understanding is that
if nobody takes it, it will be auto-retired after 6 weeks (please
correct me if I'm wrong here).

If you're interested in taking it & have any questions, I'm happy to
provide any input I can. I think ideally it would want more than one
active maintainer to get it into the shape that it needs to be (not all
features are currently packaged, and significant effort would be
required there).

Thanks,
Gerard.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 23 Beta!

[Gerard Ryan]

On 10/18/2015 06:49 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> 2015-10-02 21:20 GMT+02:00 Gerard Ryan <gali...@fedoraproject.org>:
>> On 10/02/2015 07:11 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>>> 2015-09-26 0:10 GMT+02:00 Thomas Daede <bztdli...@gmail.com>:
>>>> On 09/25/2015 02:18 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Removed librtmp (what could go wrong?), now I get the following error:
>>>>>
>>>>> Sep 25 23:14:39 iMacLinux dnf[621]: Error: package
>>>>> kernel-core-4.1.7-200.fc22.x86_64 requires systemd >= 200, but none of
>>>>> the providers can be installed
>>>>> Sep 25 23:14:39 iMacLinux dnf[621]: (try to add '--allowerasing' to
>>>>> command line to replace conflicting packages)
>>>>> Sep 25 23:14:39 iMacLinux systemd[1]: dnf-system-upgrade.service: main
>>>>> process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
>>>>> Sep 25 23:14:39 iMacLinux systemd[1]: Unit dnf-system-upgrade.service
>>>>> entered failed state.
>>>>> Sep 25 23:14:39 iMacLinux systemd[1]: dnf-system-upgrade.service failed.
>>>>> Sep 25 23:14:39 iMacLinux systemd[1]: Rebooting as result of failure.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This looks like it might be related to
>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244175
>>>>
>>>> I had a similar problem. --allowerasing will try to erase the currently
>>>> running kernel, which will fail.
>>>
>>> Seems like the above is a blocker now. I will test again when updated.
>>>
>>
>> FWIW I think you're hitting the same issue as I am, reported here:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266589
>>
>> --
> 
> I still can't upgrade, I get:
> 
> dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync
> dnf system-upgrade reboot
> 
> ...
> Oct 18 19:45:47 iMacLinux dnf[668]: Error: package
> kernel-core-4.2.3-200.fc22.x86_64 requires systemd >= 200, but none of
> the providers can be installed
> Oct 18 19:45:47 iMacLinux dnf[668]: (try to add '--allowerasing' to
> command line to replace conflicting packages)
> Oct 18 19:45:47 iMacLinux systemd[1]: dnf-system-upgrade.service: main
> process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
> Oct 18 19:45:47 iMacLinux systemd[1]: Unit dnf-system-upgrade.service
> entered failed state.
> Oct 18 19:45:47 iMacLinux systemd[1]: dnf-system-upgrade.service failed.
> Oct 18 19:45:47 iMacLinux systemd[1]: Rebooting as result of failure.
> Oct 18 19:45:47 iMacLinux audit[1]:  pid=1 uid=0
> auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0
> msg='unit=dnf-system-upgrade comm="systemd" exe=
> ...

Hi Andreas,

Yes, I'm in the same situation. Would you mind adding the info of what
you get to the bug in bugzilla so that the maintainers can see it all in
one place (it's difficult for everyone to keep up with this mailing list
all the time) and know that there are more people experiencing it.

Thanks a lot,
Gerard.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 23 Beta!

[Gerard Ryan]

On 10/19/2015 07:47 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 19.10.2015 um 20:35 schrieb Gerard Ryan:
>> On 10/18/2015 06:49 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>>> I still can't upgrade, I get:
>>>
>>> dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync
>>> dnf system-upgrade reboot
>>
>> Yes, I'm in the same situation. Would you mind adding the info of what
>> you get to the bug in bugzilla so that the maintainers can see it all in
>> one place (it's difficult for everyone to keep up with this mailing list
>> all the time) and know that there are more people experiencing it
> 
> any bet "dnf --releasever=23 --distro-sync" followed by a reboot just
> works as online dist-upgrades are working *for years* on dozens fo
> machines while all the offline-updatem, pre-upgrade and whatever stuff
> was *never* reliebale

Thankfully I only ever have one or two systems to update. :)

Even if that online way that you mention works, I'm going to hold off
until the "recommended" (is it?) way works, since otherwise I won't have
any way to verify the fix when it comes.

Let's hope that once these issues are ironed out that it will be as
reliable as any other way.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 23 Beta!

[Gerard Ryan]

On 10/02/2015 07:11 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> 2015-09-26 0:10 GMT+02:00 Thomas Daede :
>> On 09/25/2015 02:18 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>>
>>> Removed librtmp (what could go wrong?), now I get the following error:
>>>
>>> Sep 25 23:14:39 iMacLinux dnf[621]: Error: package
>>> kernel-core-4.1.7-200.fc22.x86_64 requires systemd >= 200, but none of
>>> the providers can be installed
>>> Sep 25 23:14:39 iMacLinux dnf[621]: (try to add '--allowerasing' to
>>> command line to replace conflicting packages)
>>> Sep 25 23:14:39 iMacLinux systemd[1]: dnf-system-upgrade.service: main
>>> process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
>>> Sep 25 23:14:39 iMacLinux systemd[1]: Unit dnf-system-upgrade.service
>>> entered failed state.
>>> Sep 25 23:14:39 iMacLinux systemd[1]: dnf-system-upgrade.service failed.
>>> Sep 25 23:14:39 iMacLinux systemd[1]: Rebooting as result of failure.
>>>
>>
>> This looks like it might be related to
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244175
>>
>> I had a similar problem. --allowerasing will try to erase the currently
>> running kernel, which will fail.
> 
> Seems like the above is a blocker now. I will test again when updated.
> 

FWIW I think you're hitting the same issue as I am, reported here:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266589

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

minimal-json license change

[Gerard Ryan]

Howdy,

The recent update of minimal-json in Rawhide to version 0.9.4 has
changed the license from EPL to MIT. An update for f23 will follow.

Thanks,
Gerard.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Not-very-reassuring info on FedUp wiki page for F21

[Gerard Ryan]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi devel,

On the Important Changes in the Upgrade process to Fedora 21 on the
FedUp wiki page[1], I see the following:

 Apparently there will be a new option --product=PRODUCT and
 before update you will be required to choose one of the
 possibilities. To obtain the old behaviour apparently
 --product=nonproduct should be used.

I think this could be improved to give more sure directions. I know
it's a wiki, and just edit/fix it, but I don't know enough about
what it should be to confidently change it. Could someone who is more
sure than I (and the original author, apparently) of what it should be
weigh in? Is it just a case of removing the apparently(s)?

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp

Thanks a lot,
Gerard.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=plgB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Not-very-reassuring info on FedUp wiki page for F21

[Gerard Ryan]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 07/12/14 22:00, Matthew Miller wrote:
 On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 01:49:47PM -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
 [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp
 I was about to go edit it, but I see that mattdm has already
 fixed it. :-)
 
 Very quickly. If you have further refinements, go for it!
 

Very quickly indeed! Thanks a lot! :)

Gerard.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=qbpA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Trouble retiring package on F21 branch

[Gerard Ryan]

Hi,

We're trying to retire package eclipse-wtp-common on F21 and Rawhide. My
understanding is that this should be done F21 first, then Rawhide. F21
has proven problematic so far.

Bug is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117475

History:

1. Package eclipse-wtp-common is obsoleted/provided by eclipse-webtools
subpackage

2. A package administrator (note: not owner), tries to use fedpkg to
retire, but it fails: Performs dead.package commit, then can't change
point of contact to orphan in the second part of that process.

3. Proven packager comes to help; tries to retire, gets message You are
not allowed to retire this package.

4. Package owner comes along, tries to retire. Get's a little further in
that the package is now orphan for that branch, but then gets message:
You are not allowed to retire the package: eclipse-wtp-common on branch
f21

Is there something additional that we need to do, or is there something
in the above sequence of events that has screwed things up? Or is F21 in
some state that is preventing package retirement? Or is it something else?

Thanks in advance for any help that any of you can provide!

Gerard.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update

[Gerard Ryan]

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
 Did you experience crashes or other serious problems with applications ?

Hi Matthias,

I had a problem with the new totem/Videos having a non-responsive UI.
I'm away on a work assignment until the 13th so unfortunately I can't
verify that it's still a problem or if it was some bad configuration
that I had.

From what I remember, videos directly in my home directory were
displayed as thumbnails on the main window and they would play fine.
If I tried to add/open a local video from another location (even
subdirectory of my home) by clicking on the + at the corner, nothing
happened. I wasn't given an open file dialog or anything like that.

As I said, it may not actually still be a problem. Maybe someone else
can verify?

Thanks,
Gerard.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: /usr/lib/java

[Gerard Ryan]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 08:48:38PM +0200, gil wrote:
hi,
I would like to report this:
in my F18 there is something of wrong...
/usr/lib/java/
java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/
in each java folder
file:///usr/lib/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/jansi-native-linux.jar
file:///usr/lib/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/jffi.jar
file:///usr/lib/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/jss4.jar
file:///usr/lib/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/java/swt.jar

regards
gil

Problem looks to be that %{_libdir}/java/java is a misplaced symlink
to its parent %{_libdir}/java/

Gerard.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
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=odD1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Customizing Firefox Search.

[Gerard Ryan]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 07:03:41AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Any know of a way to build a customized search into firefox.  Basically I want
to setup a search pull down which is hard coded to a particular site.

For example, add a menu item called
MyBlog

And what ever I put into the search window ends up going to google as

$SEARCHTEXT site:danwalsh.livejournal.com


You could use a custom bookmark with a keyword for this. I don't know
all of the different parameters in a google search url, so here's an
example using DuckDuckGo:

1. Create a new bookmark with the following as the url:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=site%3Adanwalsh.livejournal.com+%s

2. Set the keyword to something such as: dw

3. In the url bar, you should now be able to search for $SEARCHTEXT on
your site by typing simply: dw $SEARCHTEXT


How to add a keyword to a bookmark isn't obvious in my opinion, so
here that is too:

1. Hit Ctrl+Shift+o to open the main bookmarks window

2. On the left pane, click on unsorted bookmarks (or wherever you want
the bookmark to be located, I don't think it matters much).

3. From the 'Organize' menu at the top of that window, choose 'New
Bookmark'.

4. A 'New Bookmark' dialog appears. In the 'Location' field, enter the
custom url from above (or if you want, an equivalent of your own
crafting, with %s as the $SEARCHTEXT). In the 'Keyword' field, enter
what you would like the keyword to be (dw in the example above).

I hope this helps!

Gerard.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
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=1baN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: To the Mate package maintainers

[Gerard Ryan]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 06:10:06PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I see that Gnome's lock screen now shows a pretty clock, after the 
display wakes up, that must be swiped away in order to unlock the 
desktop. Somehow (and this would be the snarky part) I knew even 
before I started looking, that there seems to be no bloody way to 
turn it off, in case you don't feel fond of having to go through an 
extra step of unlocking a locked desktop.

If you've got a keyboard, pressing enter at that clock cover screen
will get it away so you don't need to swipe it. I know you probably
know this already, but just in case you don't, it's definitely quicker
than swiping with the mouse for me.

- --
Gerard Ryan.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
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=QrYn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel