Re: pgadmin4 prerequisites and status report for fedora 29
On 2018-08-26 08:18 AM, Joseph D. Wagner wrote: The following custom rpms will be obsolete in Fedora 29: pgadmin4-python3-blinker-1.4-3.f28.noarch => python3-blinker.noarch 1.4-3.fc29 pgadmin4-python3-fixtures-3.0.0-5.f28.noarch => python3-fixtures.noarch 3.0.0-11.fc29 pgadmin4-python3-flask-0.12.2-1.f28.noarch => python3-flask.noarch 1:1.0.2-3.fc29 pgadmin4-python3-flask-babel-0.11.1-4.f28.noarch => python3-flask-babel.noarch 0.11.2-3.fc29 pgadmin4-python3-flask-babelex-0.9.3-1.f28.noarch => python3-flask-babelex.noarch 0.9.3-3.fc29 pgadmin4-python3-flask-gravatar-0.5.0-1.f28.noarch => python3-flask-gravatar.noarch 0.5.0-3.fc29 pgadmin4-python3-flask-login-0.3.2-3.f28.noarch => python3-flask-login.noarch 0.4.1-3.fc29 pgadmin4-python3-Flask-Mail-0.9.1-4.f28.noarch => python3-flask-mail.noarch 0.9.1-4.fc29 pgadmin4-python3-flask-migrate-2.1.1-1.f28.noarch => python3-flask-migrate.noarch 2.1.1-3.fc29 pgadmin4-python3-flask-paranoid-0.2-1.f28.noarch => python3-flask-paranoid.noarch 0.2.0-4.fc29 pgadmin4-python3-flask-principal-0.4.0-14.f28.noarch => python3-flask-principal.noarch 0.4.0-17.fc29 pgadmin4-python3-flask-security-3.0.0-1.f28.noarch => python3-flask-security.noarch 3.0.0-3.fc29 pgadmin4-python3-flask-wtf-0.14.2-1.f28.noarch => python3-flask-wtf.noarch 0.14.2-3.fc29 pgadmin4-python3-html5lib-1.0.1-1.f28.noarch => python3-html5lib.noarch 1.0.1-1.fc29 pgadmin4-python3-pyrsistent-0.14.2-1.f28.x86_64 => python3-pyrsistent.x86_64 0.14.2-5.fc29 pgadmin4-python3-sqlalchemy-1.2.5-1.f28.x86_64 => python3-sqlalchemy.x86_64 1.2.11-1.fc29 pgadmin4-python3-sqlparse-0.2.4-1.f28.noarch => python3-sqlparse.noarch 0.2.4-3.fc29 pgadmin4-python3-wtforms-2.1-3.f28.noarch => python3-wtforms.noarch 2.2.1-3.fc29 The following custom rpms need to be retained unless the fedora version is updated: pgadmin4-python3-dateutil-2.7.2-1.f28.noarch <= python3-dateutil.noarch 1:2.7.0-3.fc29 Updated version requested: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560212 pgadmin4-python3-flask-htmlmin-1.3.2-1.f28.noarch <= python3-flask-htmlmin.noarch 1.3.1-3.fc29 Updated version requested: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622327 pgadmin4-python3-passlib-1.7.1-1.f28.noarch <= python3-passlib.noarch 1.7.0-10.fc29 Updated version requested: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1620382 pgadmin4-python3-simplejson-3.13.2-1.f28.x86_64 <= python3-simplejson.x86_64 3.10.0-10.fc29 Updated version requested: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1462583 The following custom rpms have no fedora equivalent: pgadmin4-python3-dateutil-doc-2.7.2-1.f28.noarch Is this one really needed? pgadmin4-python3-sshtunnel-0.1.3-1.f28.noarch What can we do to create a python3-sshtunnel package in fedora? Once the custom rpms are no longer needed, it will be an easy matter to create a fedora package for pgadmin4. Joseph D. Wagner all packages required already in fedora, all you need todo is update pgadmin4 spec and get it approved. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
looking for the maintainer of python-flask-wtf
if you're the owner of python-flask-wtf. There's a pull request waiting for you. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-flask-wtf ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: non responsive maintainer - package python-flask-login
On 04/17/2018 07:00 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 16:16 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: Is there some reason that you couldn't mention who the package maintainer is? Both Richard Marko (rmarko) and Jan Kaluža (jkaluza) are listed as maintainers that package. Also, I don't think you (Itamar) have fully followed the 'non- responsive maintainer' process so far: 1. Check if the non-responsive maintainer is on vacation. To see if the maintainer has been recently active on Fedora, fedora-active-user can be employed. 2. File a bug against the package in Bugzilla asking for the maintainer to respond. This bug should list the outstanding issues they need to address. This is a must. 3. After every 7 days, the reporter adds a comment to the bug report asking again for a response. Others can add to the bug that they also were not successful in contacting the maintainer, or providing additional contact information for the maintainer (i.e., alternative email, IRC, etc). 4. After 2 failed attempts (2 weeks of no response from the maintainer), the reporter posts to the Fedora devel list with a link to the bug report and asks if anyone knows how to contact the maintainer. I don't think you followed 2 or 3 before doing 4. The policy means to file a bug *specifically about non-responsiveness*. The bug you're referring to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550697 just requests a version bump (so the maintainer may have treated it as non-urgent), and doesn't say anything about non-responsiveness. Nor have you asked for a response every 7 days, as required by 3. FWIW, I know Jan Kaluza is active, however he doesn't appear to be CCed on either bug. Perhaps he isn't configured to get bug mail for the package. It may be a good idea to CC him on the bugs. adding python-flask-login-ow...@fedoraproject.org in this mail. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
non responsive maintainer - package python-flask-login
I filled a bug report and then a pull request I have been waiting for 2 months, https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-flask-login/pull-requests I am sending this mail and then filling a non-responsive ticket against the package owner. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new Point of Contact
2015-09-30 16:40 GMT-03:00 Kevin Fenzi : > proftpd (el5) > proftpd (el6) > proftpd (epel7) > proftpd (f21) > proftpd (f22) > proftpd (f23) > proftpd (master) I took proftpd all branches, -- Itamar Reis Peixoto -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Non-responsive Maintainer - itamarjp
On Apr 29, 2015 20:45, "Eric Christensen" wrote: > > Does anyone know how to contact itamarjp? I've been trying to contact him > through BZ[0] regarding a security flaw in ytnef that's been open for going on > five years. > > [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632537 > > Thanks. > > --Eri have you asked commit access in pkgdb ? if you have power to commit without having access in pkgdb please go ahead. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [GSoC'15] Btrfs content-based-storage mode
On Mar 24, 2015 10:04 PM, "harshad shirwadkar" wrote: > > Hello all, > > I am a CS graduate student at Carnegie Mellon University, and past contributor to the Fedora Project via Google Summer of Code 2011. > > For my research, I would like to have btrfs with content based storage option. This idea is also listed on Btrfs ideas page ( https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Project_ideas#Content_based_storage ). > I would like to implement that as a Google summer of code 2015 project. However, I have not found any mentors for that idea yet. Are any of the Btrfs developers interested in mentoring the project? > > Here is my brief background: > As an undergraduate student, I worked on Ext4 snapshot project ( http://lwn.net/Articles/442078/). After that, I implemented snapshot revert function for Ext4 snapshots as a GSoC 2011 project with Fedora. Also, I have worked on Atheros based WiFi drivers for 3 years at a WiFi startup. So, I do have a good Linux kernel programming background. > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > Harshad Shirwadkar. > > -- > devel mailing list submit your proposal via google-melange right now -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
deadline for fedora org to appy in google summer of code 2015
https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2015 3 days, 5 hours remaining -- Itamar Reis Peixoto -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Bootstrapping build-time circular dependent packages
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Vladimir Stackov wrote: > Say we have two packages: > > Name: a > Requires: b drop this one and build A, then build b, and rebuild A adding the dependencie back ---> BuildRequires: b > > and > > Name: b > Requires: a > BuildRequires: a -- Itamar Reis Peixoto -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: NetBeans Re-Enable
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 4:36 PM, مصعب الزعبي wrote: > Hi all > > Netbeans disabled on F16 due to lack of maintainers. > > I asked to take it on PkgDB No answer .. > > Regards > Mosaab > I think you probably needs to file a new review request -- Itamar Reis Peixoto -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Fwd: Unresponsive maintainer Germán Racca (skytux)
Germán do you have a answer for Sergio ? -- Forwarded message -- From: Sergio Pascual Date: Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:13 AM Subject: Re: Unresponsive maintainer Germán Racca (skytux) To: Development discussions related to Fedora Hello, the past week I requested to take the package APLpy, following the nonresponsive maintainer policy. Apart of writing to the devel list, is there anything more I have to do to move this forward? 2014-09-01 23:47 GMT+02:00 Sergio Pascual : > The last week I asked if somebody knows how to contact Germán Racca. Given > that all attempts to contact him have been unsuccessfull and as I would > like to fix bug #1116895 I request to take over package APLpy > > Regards, Sergio > > > [1] > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-August/201825.html > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116895 > Itamar Reis Peixoto -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Unresponsive maintainer Germán Racca (skytux)
how long you requested commit access in pkgdb ? https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/APLpy/ On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Sergio Pascual wrote: > Hello, the past week I requested to take the package APLpy, following the > nonresponsive maintainer policy. Apart of writing to the devel list, is > there anything more I have to do to move this forward? > > 2014-09-01 23:47 GMT+02:00 Sergio Pascual : > >> The last week I asked if somebody knows how to contact Germán Racca. >> Given that all attempts to contact him have been unsuccessfull and as I >> would like to fix bug #1116895 I request to take over package APLpy >> >> Regards, Sergio >> >> >> [1] >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-August/201825.html >> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116895 >> > > > Sergio > > -- > Itamar Reis Peixoto -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: yum groupinstall development-tools FAILS
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote: > People, > > This command: > > yum groupinstall development-tools > > fails with these errors: > > Transaction Check Error: > file /usr/share/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/systemtap.mo from install of > systemtap-devel-2.2.1-1.fc18.x86_64 conflicts with file from package try yum -y install @development-tools --enablerepo=updates-testing Itamar Reis Peixoto -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fwd: E-Mai! Ganhe dinheiro na internet sem sair da sua cadeira! Não perca tempo. Confira. ID: 005
-- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Sat, May 4, 2013 at 4:00 PM Subject: E-Mai! Ganhe dinheiro na internet sem sair da sua cadeira! Não perca tempo. Confira. ID: 005 To: relnotes-cont...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- relnotes-content mailing list relnotes-cont...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/relnotes-content I am receiving spam in this list. -- Itamar Reis Peixoto -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: MariaDB in Fedora
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Henrique Junior wrote: > Other distros are discussing about the future of MySQL and the > implementation of MariaDB as default. What is Fedora position about this > matter? > > -- > Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior > http://about.me/henriquejunior I think this is going to happen for F19 or F20 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=15262 Itamar Reis Peixoto -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 5 (TC5) Available Now!
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qua, 2012-09-05 at 09:53 -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:18 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> > On Sex, 2012-08-31 at 23:03 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote: >> >> As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 5 (TC5) >> >> is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, >> >> can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5284#comment:11 >> >> . Please see the following pages for download links (including delta >> >> ISOs) and testing instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should >> >> provide the fastest download. >> > >> > Fedora-18-Alpha-TC5-x86_64-netinst.iso, went very well in my VirtualBox. >> > It passed :) >> > >> > Thanks, >> > -- >> > Sérgio M. B. >> > >> >> for me doesnt work when burned to a usb disk. > > What doesn't worked ? if you want reply me privately in Portuguese. > Its fail for me, look http://ispbrasil.com.br/IMG_20120904_190501.jpg I wrote it to usb disk using dd -- Itamar Reis Peixoto http://www.quebarato.com.br/perfil/itamarjp -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 5 (TC5) Available Now!
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:18 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sex, 2012-08-31 at 23:03 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote: >> As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 5 (TC5) >> is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, >> can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5284#comment:11 >> . Please see the following pages for download links (including delta >> ISOs) and testing instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should >> provide the fastest download. > > Fedora-18-Alpha-TC5-x86_64-netinst.iso, went very well in my VirtualBox. > It passed :) > > Thanks, > -- > Sérgio M. B. > for me doesnt work when burned to a usb disk. -- Itamar Reis Peixoto http://www.quebarato.com.br/perfil/itamarjp -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: F18, koji and IPv6
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Alexey I. Froloff wrote: >> Before F18 is released, can someone, please, take a loot at >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836329 ? Month and a >> half have passed already and patch exists. > > I took a peek at upstream koji git, and I don't see anything > addressing this, or an upstream Trac to do so. > > https://fedorahosted.org/koji/ > > Filing a Trac there, referencing the BZ and vice versa might be a good > next step. I assume this patch is tested? It doesn't look that > invasive, but could be hard for many of us to test who lack ipv6 > connectivity. a sixxs tunnel will fix the lack of ipv6 > -J > >> -- >> Regards,-- >> Sir Raorn. --- http://thousandsofhate.blogspot.com/ >> -- Itamar Reis Peixoto -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently > orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. > > The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If > you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. > If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before > we branch for Fedora 18. That is currently scheduled to happen on > or around August 7th. > > Package papyon (orphan) > comaintained by: itamarjp I will take papyon, emesene still uses it. -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ARM is a dead end
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Hi, > > I've been pointed to a news item about a (apparently the first) x86 (Atom) > based smartphone: > http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/14/orange-san-diego-review/ > > So even smartphones are going x86 now. It looks like x86 is going to defeat > ARM just like it defeated all the previous attempts at changing the > instruction set, even Intel's own IA-64. The fastest x86 CPUs are still > worlds faster than the fastest ARM CPUs. This new smartphone's single-core > Atom is competitive in speed with other smartphones' multi-core ARMs. > > So I would urge Fedora not to waste our time on a low-end architecture > filling a temporary niche which will become obsolete as demand for > performance increases. We should rather support only one primary > architecture (x86, i.e.: x86_64, and legacy i686 as long as there's a need > for it) and support it well, as we have done since we finally got rid of the > legacy PPC burden. Niche architectures are exactly what secondary > architectures are for. > > Kevin Kofler > well, at my home I have more arm machines than x86 I am replacing x86 with arm -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Emesene package mantainer
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Caterpillar wrote: >> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5730 >> > No, what about stable updates? look at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates its pushed into updates-testing if you add some karma it will become stable. -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Emesene package mantainer
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Caterpillar wrote: > I opened a bugreport about the nonresponsive package mantainer of emesene. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797260 > This is the third point of procedure > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers > Does anybody know how to contact him? > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel have you tried updates-testing ? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5730 -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
help with adding systemd support to a package.
hello I need help adding systemd support into xrdp. someone can take a look and tell me what is wrong ? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3762991 some changes are here. https://github.com/itamarjp/xrdp/commits/master and otheres are in spec file. -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: PHP 5.4 Fedora 17 feature - STATUS
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Remi Collet wrote: > Le 19/01/2012 19:57, Remi Collet a écrit : >> Feature page : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Php54 > > I just finish to rebuild > > php-5.4.0-0.1.RC6.fc17 > > And dependant packages : > > cups-1.5.0-28.fc17 > graphviz-2.28.0-13.fc17 > libdigidocpp-0.3.0-13.fc17 > libpuzzle-0.11-12.fc17 > php-facedetect-1.0.1-6.fc17 > php-idn-1.2c-5.fc17 > php-libvirt-0.4.5-1.fc17 > php-magickwand-1.0.9-2.fc17 > php-pecl-apc-3.1.9-4.svn316786.fc17 > php-pecl-gearman-1.0.1-1.fc17 > php-pecl-geoip-1.0.8-1.fc17 > php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.10-0.1.b1.fc17 > php-pecl-igbinary-1.1.2-0.1.git3b8ab7e.fc17 > php-pecl-lzf-1.5.2-9.fc17 > php-pecl-mailparse-2.1.5-6.fc17 > php-pecl-imagick-3.1.0-0.1.RC1.fc17 > php-pecl-memcache-3.0.6-3.fc17 > php-pecl-memcached-2.0.0-0.1.git1736623.fc17 > php-pecl-mongo-1.2.7-1.fc17 > php-pecl-ncurses-1.0.1-5.fc17 > php-pecl-oauth-1.2.2-3.fc17 > php-pecl-radius-1.2.5-13.fc17 > php-pecl-rrd-1.0.5-3.fc17 > php-pecl-selinux-0.3.1-8.fc17 > php-pecl-solr-1.0.2-3.fc17 > php-pecl-sphinx-1.1.0-3.fc17 > php-pecl-ssh2-0.11.3-1.fc17 > php-pecl-xdebug-2.2.0-0.1.gitd076740.fc17 > php-pecl-yaml-1.0.1-6.fc17 > php-shout-0.9.2-10.fc17 > syck-0.61-16.fc17 > uuid-1.6.2-8.fc17 > zarafa-7.0.4-2.fc17 > zorba-2.1.0-3.fc17 > very nice, thanks for great job and for fixing php-pecl-ssh2 -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
review of bacula-docs
bacula is already in fedora. why there are a review ( with review + ) for bacula-docs ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771941 why not add bacula-docs as sub-package of bacula ? -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
fedora 16 koji broken
fedora 16 koji broken http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3596971 DEBUG util.py:307: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/yum', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f16-build-1203861-192685/root/', 'groupinstall', 'srpm-build'] DEBUG util.py:257: Error: Package: nss-3.13.1-9.fc16.i686 (build) DEBUG util.py:257: Requires: nss-softokn(x86-32) >= 3.13.1 DEBUG util.py:257: Available: nss-softokn-3.12.10-6.fc16.i686 (build) DEBUG util.py:257: nss-softokn(x86-32) = 3.12.10-6.fc16 DEBUG util.py:257: You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem DEBUG util.py:257: You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest DEBUG util.py:257: Error: Package: nss-3.13.1-9.fc16.i686 (build) DEBUG util.py:257: Requires: nss-softokn(x86-32) >= 3.13.1 DEBUG util.py:257: Installing: nss-softokn-3.12.10-6.fc16.i686 (build) DEBUG util.py:257: nss-softokn(x86-32) = 3.12.10-6.fc16 DEBUG util.py:347: Child returncode was: 1 -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
emesene license change
emesene license changed. -License:GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ +License:GPLv3 -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Emesene 2.11.11 package
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Andrea Stagi wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm Andrea Stagi, I work as a developer and in my spare time I'm an > open source developer mainly focused on Emesene and Turpial projects ( > https://github.com/4ndreaSt4gi )... This is the first time I try > Fedora on my PC because I had a bad experience with lastest Ubuntu > versions and Fedora is the perfect distribution I was looking for, > really fast and stable for work. > > I'm writing here just to introduce myself according with the Fedora > wiki and , as an Emesene developer, to notify that I built a rpm > package for Fedora, opening a request here: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769124 > > Someone could review my request? If something's wrong let me know ^^ > > Keep up the good work and thanks for all! > > =.4.S.= > emesene already exists in fedora. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/emesene its just need to be updated. -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[bucardo] - new version 4.4.7
commit 859278996764e7edb54e25caaa9cd391c77b6609
Author: Itamar
Date: Wed Nov 9 17:53:20 2011 -0200
- new version 4.4.7
.gitignore |1 +
Bucardo-4.4.7.tar.gz.asc |6 ++
bucardo.spec |5 -
sources |3 +--
4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 24f52e9..45258d0 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@ Bucardo-4.4.0.tar.gz
/Bucardo-4.4.5.tar.gz.asc
/Bucardo-4.4.6.tar.gz
/Bucardo-4.4.6.tar.gz.asc
+/Bucardo-4.4.7.tar.gz
diff --git a/Bucardo-4.4.7.tar.gz.asc b/Bucardo-4.4.7.tar.gz.asc
new file mode 100644
index 000..363dfc7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Bucardo-4.4.7.tar.gz.asc
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
+
+iEYEABEDAAYFAk65o4IACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjR5QCff+1TuijAMn7JzxvM8DNH5hzp
+XLkAoKH1e3G5w7dD2RjtbACmwSn9PDso
+=BkGV
+-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff --git a/bucardo.spec b/bucardo.spec
index 6d6d7c5..9a4428e 100644
--- a/bucardo.spec
+++ b/bucardo.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
%define realname Bucardo
Name: bucardo
-Version:4.4.6
+Version:4.4.7
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Postgres replication system for both multi-master and
multi-slave operations
@@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%dir %{_localstatedir}/run/bucardo
%changelog
+* Wed Nov 09 2011 Itamar - 4.4.7-1
+- new version 4.4.7
+
* Mon Jul 11 2011 Itamar Reis Peixoto - 4.4.6-1
- new version 4.4.6
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index b76c8b4..000b3c1 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1,2 +1 @@
-e74b526e9eb3ef7de936e720c4b2f222 Bucardo-4.4.6.tar.gz
-cdfddfb7e13bc4fc197fe709b7271bd0 Bucardo-4.4.6.tar.gz.asc
+9192165d68856139b0fd605971f599a5 Bucardo-4.4.7.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Bucardo-4.4.7.tar.gz.asc uploaded to lookaside cache by itamarjp
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for bucardo: 38a142cb48a2786c572082b9b5a9099b Bucardo-4.4.7.tar.gz.asc -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Bucardo-4.4.7.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by itamarjp
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for bucardo: 9192165d68856139b0fd605971f599a5 Bucardo-4.4.7.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: howto build for EL5 on F15 in mock?
2011/9/6 Michał Piotrowski : > Hi, > > I'm trying to build cherokee-1.2.1 for EL5 on my F15 system and I'm > getting an error > DEBUG util.py:250: cherokee > ## > DEBUG util.py:250: error: unpacking of archive failed on file > /builddir/build/SOURCES/01-drop-privileges.patch;4e664eb5: cpio: MD5 > sum mismatch > > AFAICS I can build this package for F15. I will be grateful for any hint. > > -- > Best regards, > Michal > > http://eventhorizon.pl/ download the sources. fedpkg clone cherokee cd cherokee fedpkg local -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: gimp
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: >> >> Are there any plans to bring gimp 2.7.x -> 2.8 into F16 ? > > Is there a specific reason to? The home page states that the whole > 2.7.x series should be considered unstable. > is this a good reason ? http://tech.slashdot.org/story/11/08/23/1355225/The-GIMP-Now-Has-a-Working-Single-Window-Mode Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: c-icap
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Nathan Owe wrote: > I am currently working on packaging c-icap I get the following error using > rpmlint: > rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-15-x86_64/result/c-icap-0.1.6-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm > c-icap.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency zlib > c-icap.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/bin/c-icap-libicapapi-config > c-icap.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/c-icap-config > > I know what they mean. The first error is true because during the configure > process I noticed that it gave a warning that zlib is needed for the > program's internal file-type recognizer to work. > > Now the last two, well can the last two actually be development files? I > never thought a binary file would be considered a development file. I am > asking that since I wanted to make sure there wasn't an error in the > rpmlint's output. > -- are you submitting the package for review ? what are the address of review request ? -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fwd: Rapid DHCP
Interesting message in another list. for me fedora is very slow to get dhcp address. -- Forwarded message -- From: Sridhar Dhanapalan Date: Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:51 PM Subject: Rapid DHCP To: OLPC Devel , OLPC Australia list Here's an article that tries to explain why Mac OS is so much faster at connecting to networks than Linux and Windows: http://cafbit.com/entry/rapid_dhcp_or_how_do Could such an implementation be considered for the OLPC OS? XOs go on and off the network all the time, as power management kicks in and the machines move in and out of AP range (or switch to a different AP). This is a disruptive process, and speeding it up would be welcome. Sridhar Sridhar Dhanapalan Engineering Manager One Laptop per Child Australia M: +61 425 239 701 E: srid...@laptop.org.au A: G.P.O. Box 731 Sydney, NSW 2001 W: www.laptop.org.au ___ Devel mailing list de...@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel -- ---- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
calweaver retirement.
no new versions of callweaver for a long time. no new messages in mailing lists. callweaver website is down since a week+ http://www.callweaver.org/ is ok to retire it ? -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[bucardo] - new version
commit c63156bf2e1fb8f3f2fda4b3e90bb99858c517cb Author: Itamar Reis Peixoto Date: Mon Jul 11 13:59:30 2011 -0300 - new version .gitignore |2 ++ sources|4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 9a1fbce..24f52e9 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -3,3 +3,5 @@ Bucardo-4.4.0.tar.gz /Bucardo-4.4.4.tar.gz /Bucardo-4.4.5.tar.gz /Bucardo-4.4.5.tar.gz.asc +/Bucardo-4.4.6.tar.gz +/Bucardo-4.4.6.tar.gz.asc diff --git a/sources b/sources index 36c4a90..b76c8b4 100644 --- a/sources +++ b/sources @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -90a013c5e4c5efa608aea9cf57fc49bd Bucardo-4.4.5.tar.gz -c55e4af589ece423d958059270575c6b Bucardo-4.4.5.tar.gz.asc +e74b526e9eb3ef7de936e720c4b2f222 Bucardo-4.4.6.tar.gz +cdfddfb7e13bc4fc197fe709b7271bd0 Bucardo-4.4.6.tar.gz.asc -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[bucardo] new version 4.4.6
commit 2a1c3f83b07a767804dc538d5fddab16a0ccabe4
Author: Itamar Reis Peixoto
Date: Mon Jul 11 14:00:47 2011 -0300
new version 4.4.6
bucardo.spec | 11 ---
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/bucardo.spec b/bucardo.spec
index 80668d6..6d6d7c5 100644
--- a/bucardo.spec
+++ b/bucardo.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
%define realname Bucardo
Name: bucardo
-Version:4.4.5
+Version:4.4.6
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Postgres replication system for both multi-master and
multi-slave operations
@@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ URL:http://bucardo.org/
Source0:http://bucardo.org/downloads/Bucardo-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
-Source1: master-master-replication-example.txt
+Source1: Bucardo-%{version}.tar.gz.asc
+Source2: master-master-replication-example.txt
+
BuildArch: noarch
@@ -69,7 +71,7 @@ rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}/bucardo_ctl
install -Dp -m 755 bucardo_ctl $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_sbindir}/bucardo_ctl
mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_localstatedir}/run/bucardo
-install -Dp -m 644 %{SOURCE1} .
+install -Dp -m 644 %{SOURCE2} .
@@ -92,6 +94,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%dir %{_localstatedir}/run/bucardo
%changelog
+* Mon Jul 11 2011 Itamar Reis Peixoto - 4.4.6-1
+- new version 4.4.6
+
* Sun Jun 19 2011 Itamar Reis Peixoto - 4.4.5-1
- New version 4.4.5 fix truncate bug
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Bucardo-4.4.6.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by itamarjp
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for bucardo: e74b526e9eb3ef7de936e720c4b2f222 Bucardo-4.4.6.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Bucardo-4.4.6.tar.gz.asc uploaded to lookaside cache by itamarjp
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for bucardo: cdfddfb7e13bc4fc197fe709b7271bd0 Bucardo-4.4.6.tar.gz.asc -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 15 ARM hardfp Virtual FAD (Fedora Activity Day) - FRIDAY
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Jon Masters wrote: > > We're going to deliver one after this armv7hl bootstrap. What we're > going to do is get koji running with a minimal mock (or even once we get > to just mock) and then re-run the bootstrap scripts > automatically/rebuild the RPMs and hope that we caught every > customization we needed. Those that were missed will be documented, then > everything will be written up. Maybe not Shakespeare, but sufficiently. > > The wider problem that feeds from this is setting guidance. I'll throw > some recommendations out there as a result of the bootstrap, not limited > to just the two observations so far. Debian and others have much more > comprehensive documentation on this stuff and that needs fixing. > > Jon. how hard is to add a flag bootstrap in rpm spec file to all base packages needed to start ? -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 15 ARM hardfp Virtual FAD (Fedora Activity Day) - FRIDAY
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Jon Masters wrote: > On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 00:52 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > >> We are hosting another one of our regular Fedora 15 hardfp Virtual >> Fedora Activity Day today Friday July 8th, at 14:00UTC (10:00 Eastern >> Daylight Time). The purpose of this session is to co-ordinate the >> bootstrap of F15 hardfp (hardware floating point). Going forward, the >> proposal is that these remain on Fridays, and at the same time. > > As a followup, we now have a working yum installation. Next week, we > will be working on support for mock. Once we have these, we can build up > missing dependencies, then rebuild everything we have with rpmbuild. At > that point, we can rebuild everything within mock and Koji-fyificate. > > It's becoming clear that several points do need raising with FESCo: > * Fedora should (IMO) institute mandatory mass rebuilds. Either every > cycle, or every other cycle. I've briefly discussed with Dennis. > Bootstrapping (and similar activities) are far easier with a clean set > of deps, which is the case for F15. It should always be the case that we > know everything builds and self-hosts through a mass rebuild per cycle. > * Fedora would benefit from an explicit position on the dependency > explosion we're seeing in basic packages. Without going off too far into > my personal opinions on a need to respect UNIX heritage, etc. I will say > that the explosion of requirements is going to be a problem for any > future efforts and will get worse without guidance. > > Meanwhile, enjoy working yum. Next week, working mock, hopefully. > > Thanks, > > Jon. > > I agree, we must have a bootstrapping guide. -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: qt-ibase - ibase sql driver for Qt
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Minh Ngo wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719002 > you will have it soon :-) -- ---- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: qt-ibase - ibase sql driver for Qt
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Minh Ngo wrote: > Hi, > I would suggest adding qt-sql-ibase driver to the Fedora repository. > This driver provides the InterBase/FireBird plugin for Qt 4. The patch > for the spec > file:https://raw.github.com/Ignotus/spec-files/e35c5f95b72b63f7f51b7ae4cfc4e06fc3d62d97/sqlibase.patch > > Regards, > -- > Minh [ignotus] Ngo > Kiev, Ukraine > JID: ignot...@jabber.kiev.ua go ahead and submit the package for review https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers feel free to contact me if you need help in something. Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Looking for a sponsor
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Elder Marco wrote: > Hi all, > > I created a new review request ( yad program - > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683150) > > This is my first package. So, if possible, could someone sponsor me? > > Best Regards, > > -- > Elder Marco > parece que ja tem alguem revisando seu pacote, boa sorte. -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[bucardo/el6: 3/3] Merge branch 'master' into el6
commit 0bb7f714feff3111efedc1213b7e576bd190b650 Merge: 4a5577a cf6cce6 Author: Itamar Reis Peixoto Date: Sun Jun 19 17:25:44 2011 -0300 Merge branch 'master' into el6 .gitignore |2 ++ bucardo.spec |5 - sources |3 ++- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[bucardo/el6] (3 commits) ...Merge branch 'master' into el6
Summary of changes: f36be97... New version 4.4.5 fix truncate bug (*) cf6cce6... uploading new sources (*) 0bb7f71... Merge branch 'master' into el6 (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[bucardo/f13: 3/3] Merge branch 'master' into f13
commit bca378815a967b87fb785371898c6e8c70a7b27b Merge: 19bda46 cf6cce6 Author: Itamar Reis Peixoto Date: Sun Jun 19 17:20:23 2011 -0300 Merge branch 'master' into f13 .gitignore |2 ++ bucardo.spec |5 - sources |3 ++- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[bucardo/f13] (3 commits) ...Merge branch 'master' into f13
Summary of changes: f36be97... New version 4.4.5 fix truncate bug (*) cf6cce6... uploading new sources (*) bca3788... Merge branch 'master' into f13 (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[bucardo/f14] (2 commits) ...uploading new sources
Summary of changes: f36be97... New version 4.4.5 fix truncate bug (*) cf6cce6... uploading new sources (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[bucardo/f15] (2 commits) ...uploading new sources
Summary of changes: f36be97... New version 4.4.5 fix truncate bug (*) cf6cce6... uploading new sources (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[bucardo] uploading new sources
commit cf6cce6b2948c28c98405959250b8fe39f28601e Author: Itamar Reis Peixoto Date: Sun Jun 19 16:54:17 2011 -0300 uploading new sources .gitignore |2 ++ sources|3 ++- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 6097f4a..9a1fbce 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ Bucardo-4.4.0.tar.gz /Bucardo-4.4.3.tar.gz /Bucardo-4.4.4.tar.gz +/Bucardo-4.4.5.tar.gz +/Bucardo-4.4.5.tar.gz.asc diff --git a/sources b/sources index b993030..36c4a90 100644 --- a/sources +++ b/sources @@ -1 +1,2 @@ -41493ace4e81ae4587250ff59dc4e911 Bucardo-4.4.4.tar.gz +90a013c5e4c5efa608aea9cf57fc49bd Bucardo-4.4.5.tar.gz +c55e4af589ece423d958059270575c6b Bucardo-4.4.5.tar.gz.asc -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Bucardo-4.4.5.tar.gz.asc uploaded to lookaside cache by itamarjp
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for bucardo: c55e4af589ece423d958059270575c6b Bucardo-4.4.5.tar.gz.asc -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Bucardo-4.4.5.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by itamarjp
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for bucardo: 90a013c5e4c5efa608aea9cf57fc49bd Bucardo-4.4.5.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[bucardo] New version 4.4.5 fix truncate bug
commit f36be97e2fae9916f816bdfae6dac1beb450b74d
Author: Itamar Reis Peixoto
Date: Sun Jun 19 16:50:59 2011 -0300
New version 4.4.5 fix truncate bug
bucardo.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/bucardo.spec b/bucardo.spec
index 58ab6f1..80668d6 100644
--- a/bucardo.spec
+++ b/bucardo.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
%define realname Bucardo
Name: bucardo
-Version:4.4.4
+Version:4.4.5
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Postgres replication system for both multi-master and
multi-slave operations
@@ -92,6 +92,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%dir %{_localstatedir}/run/bucardo
%changelog
+* Sun Jun 19 2011 Itamar Reis Peixoto - 4.4.5-1
+- New version 4.4.5 fix truncate bug
+
* Sun May 15 2011 Itamar Reis Peixoto - 4.4.4-1
- New version 4.4.4 fix backslash bug
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: What is the status of Features/YumLangpackPlugin?
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Thomas Moschny wrote: > 2011/6/14 Itamar Reis Peixoto : >> where I can get a list of internal identifiers > > "yum grouplist -v" shows them. > > Thomas Moschny thank you, its very useful when you're talking to a spanish person, because you can tell the english names. - Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: What is the status of Features/YumLangpackPlugin?
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: >> about language packs >> >> in fedora we do >> >> yum -y groupinstall "development tools" >> >> but in portuguese >> yum -y groupinstall "ferramentas de desenvolvimento" >> >> >> and in spanish is another thing >> >> its possible to change yum to accept both english and >> internacionalized language ? > > You can use the internal identifier (which is never translated), i.e.: > yum groupinstall development-tools > > Kevin Kofler > where I can get a list of internal identifiers -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: What is the status of Features/YumLangpackPlugin?
about language packs in fedora we do yum -y groupinstall "development tools" but in portuguese yum -y groupinstall "ferramentas de desenvolvimento" and in spanish is another thing its possible to change yum to accept both english and internacionalized language ? - Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: memtest86+
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: > > Best I can tell the current version of memtest86+ in Fedora is v4.10 > which is too old for Sandy Bridge which needs version v4.20. > > Anyone know if there is some reason we haven't updated to the current > version (released January 2011) ? > > Thanks. > report a bug or send a e-mail to the package owner to update it. Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
javascript linux
look http://bellard.org/jslinux/ -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[bucardo/f14] - new version 4.4.4
Summary of changes: 8ae56a4... - new version 4.4.4 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
ipv6 tools + ipv4 tools fusion.
why ipv6 and ipv4 have different name for the tools ? for example ping6 and ping I think it's possible writing a wrapper to detect if a ip is v4 or v6 and execute the correct cmd, what fedora guys think about this ? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
File Bucardo-4.4.3.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by itamarjp
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for bucardo: bd15d99de987ccb0b9fa5050e208e061 Bucardo-4.4.3.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Adding patches in a SPEC
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Eric "Sparks" Christensen wrote: > I've never had to add a patch to a SPEC file before and I can't seem > to make it work. > > The patch is to make a modification to the Makefile. I created the > patch (diff -u) and put that in my SOURCES directory. I included the > Patch0: line and then called the patch in %prep using %patch0 (no > switches). When I run rpmbuild I get the following: > > [u...@system rpmbuild]$ rpmbuild -ba SPECS/gpredict.spec > Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ILyyD6 > + umask 022 > + cd /home/user/rpmbuild/BUILD > + LANG=C > + export LANG > + unset DISPLAY > + cd /home/user/rpmbuild/BUILD > + rm -rf gpredict-1.2 > + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /home/user/rpmbuild/SOURCES/gpredict-1.2.tar.gz > + /bin/tar -xf - > + STATUS=0 > + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' > + cd gpredict-1.2 > + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . > + echo 'Patch #0 (gpredict-1.2-DSO.patch):' > Patch #0 (gpredict-1.2-DSO.patch): > + /bin/cat /home/user/rpmbuild/SOURCES/gpredict-1.2-DSO.patch > + /usr/bin/patch -s -p0 --fuzz=0 > The text leading up to this was: > -- > |--- Makefile 2010-11-15 20:07:20.676418835 -0500 > |+++ Makefile 2010-11-15 21:35:53.803407014 -0500 > -- > File to patch: > > > It appears to not find Makefile. Most likely I'm just failing to do > something correctly here. Can someone point me in the proper > direction? > > Thanks, > Eric > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Makefile is a autotools generated file, you should not patch it. I think you should patch Makefile.in or Makefile.am -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) 23rt -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: EL-6 mono build
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Christopher Brown wrote: > On 10 May 2010 17:50, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: >> mono requires bootstrapping ? >> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=172787 >> >> how to build it ? > > No, if you build against the mono.snk strong name key in /etc/pki then > there should be no bootstrapping required. This is provided by > mono-devel I think. > > Regards > > -- > Christopher Brown there are no mono-devel in EL-6, EL-6 not inherited EL-5 packages. -- Itamar Reis Peixoto -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rpms/redir/EL-6 import.log,1.2,1.3 redir.spec,1.3,1.4
> > Or you can just use: > > BuildRequires: /usr/include/tcpd.h > > which works everywhere and you don't need conditionals. > > Paul. > seems to be interesting, but using filenames instead package names in yum appears to be more slow, I think only in build time should not be a problem. -- Itamar Reis Peixoto -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
EL-6 mono build
mono requires bootstrapping ? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=172787 how to build it ? -- Itamar Reis Peixoto -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [Xen-users] [ANNOUNCE] Xen 4.0.0 released
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Keir Fraser wrote: > Folks, > > Xen 4.0.0 has now been released! New features include: > * blktap2 (VHD support, snapshot discs, ...) > * Remus live checkpointing and fault tolerance > * Page sharing and page-to-disc for HVM guests > * Transcendent memory (http://oss.oracle.com/projects/tmem/) > > More details available on the wiki: > http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Xen4.0 > > You can pick up the sources from the new 4.0 source repository: > http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-4.0-testing.hg (tag 'RELEASE-4.0.0') > > Or download a source tarball: > http://www.xen.org/products/xen_source.html > > Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release effort! > > -- Keir > > I think the fedora-xen can be upgraded to the 4.0.0 now right ? -- Itamar Reis Peixoto e-mail/msn/google talk/sip: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br skype: itamarjp icq: 81053601 +55 11 4063 5033 +55 34 3221 8599 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
qwebirc in fedora website.
hello guy`s what do you think about adding qwebirc [1] into fedoraproject website [2] in the section get-help ? 1 - http://www.qwebirc.org/ 2 - http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-help -- Itamar Reis Peixoto e-mail/msn/google talk/sip: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br skype: itamarjp icq: 81053601 +55 11 4063 5033 +55 34 3221 8599 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Test Email
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote: > Apologies for the noise, this is a test email that should make it to > de...@lists.fp.o :-) > > Thanks, > Ricky > no problem ---- Itamar Reis Peixoto e-mail/msn/google talk/sip: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br skype: itamarjp icq: 81053601 +55 11 4063 5033 +55 34 3221 8599 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
