Re: v4l2loopback kernel module in Fedora?
On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 04:40 -0400, Christopher wrote: > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:59 AM Iñaki Ucar > wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 03:53, Christopher < > > ctubb...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > The previous packaging was on COPR, but it appears abandoned, > > > probably > > > because it's kind of worthless if it's not signed. And, it's a > > > lot of > > > manual work to self-sign and register the key with mokutil, and > > > even > > > more effort to figure out how to get DKMS to automatically sign > > > after > > > building, on kernel updates. > > > > > > I don't know enough about RPMFusion packaging. I use RPMFusion, > > > but > > > haven't looked into the contribution process. In particular, I > > > wonder > > > if their modules are signed by a key that's already trusted in > > > Fedora. > > > My guess is not, and then it's the same problem as with COPR. > > > > I don't know. But if you want to keep SecureBoot enabled, probably > > the > > only way to go is to work with upstream to get the module into the > > mainline kernel. If this module is as popular as it seems, it > > shouldn't be hard to find more people interested and more hands to > > do > > the necessary work. > > > > > I'm probably going to abandon the effort anyway. obs-studio in > > > Fedora > > > crashes constantly every time I try to change the settings and > > > save, > > > > Let me guess... GNOME Wayland session? I got a bug report in a Qt > > package I maintain with this kind of issue. It's fixed by setting > > QT_QPA_PLATFORM=xcb. Please, file a bug and tell obs' maintainer > > that > > the best way to workaround the lack of Wayland compatibility is to > > add > > that to obs' .desktop file as follows: > > > > Exec=env QT_QPA_PLATFORM=xcb obs-studio > > GNOME, but I think it happens in both Xorg and Wayland. I haven't > attempted to troubleshoot this. One thing at a time. :) Do let me know if you face any issues with OBS Studio under Fedora. I'm really trying to keep it in good shape, and up-to-date. If you experience any issues the best thing to do is to report a bug on RPMFusion. Kind regards, Momo. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: RFC: entering luks password on grub level for devices without keyboards
On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 14:13 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 13:56, Robbie Harwood > wrote: > > Tomasz Torcz writes: > > > > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 11:12:43PM +0100, Marius Schwarz wrote: > > >> Am 15.03.20 um 13:32 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel: > > >> > On 14.03.2020 13:05, Marius Schwarz wrote: > > >> >> If you encrypt the fedora ( or any ) installation with luks, > > as > > >> >> security of a mobile device indicates, you end up without the > > >> >> possibility to enter the password, when you do not have an > > in/external > > >> >> keyboard at hand. > > >> > You should use TPM 2.0 LUKS unlock instead of using passwords. > > >> > > > >> I knew someone would bring this up: TMP does not protect your > > drive, > > >> as you could boot with "init=/bin/bash 1" . > > > > > >How do you do that WITHOUT KEYBOARD? This thread is about > > very > > > specific situation, please do not forget that when generalising. > > > > I believe nothing stops someone from simply plugging one in. > > > > And the counter point is that if you can't plug one in, it is not > something that is supported. This is not general purpose hardware but > a set of hardware that is primarily built to run Microsoft Windows by > the vendor. There are going to be limits to what is going to be > possible to get done with it. > > I am a owner of HP Pavilion X2 Detachable[1] which does have a detachable keyboard. Gnome is really a blast to work with on touchscreen devices and I like it more and more. The only thing not functioning in Fedora 32 with latest kernel iswebcam. It is very annoying to have to have keyboard attached for every boot/reboot. I'm only using keyboard when I need to do some serios terminal work or so. I understand that it would require significant effort but, I think that having Plymouth OSK would be perfect. Even if it would be numbers only. I'm not familiar with TPM chips, but from what I read here it sounds like there would be no password prompt and anyone would be able to boot the device, no? [1] https://www8.hp.com/us/en/campaigns/pavilion-x2/overview.html Kind regards, Momo. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
