Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-09-01 i386
From viewpoint of the package freemarker-2.3.13-8.fc14 the issue is in the package javamail-1.4.3-2.fc13.src.rpm: ... Internal error in the plugin manager executing goal 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:2.7:javadoc': Unable to load the mojo 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:2.7:javadoc' in the plugin 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin'. A required class is missing: org/apache/maven/shared/invoker/MavenInvocationException org.apache.maven.shared.invoker.MavenInvocationException ... Probably, it is common issue for some other Java packages in the list below. See details here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631034 On 07.09.2010 6:24, Matt Domsch wrote: Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for i386 using rawhide from 2010-09-01 Full rebuild of all packages. Each failed package was retried two additional times. Those listed below have failed at least three attempts to build. Sorry I can't mail to everyone individually this round, we've grown to so many contributors that I've hit a scaling problem in FAS so I can't convert all the package owners to their real email addresses tonight. Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/ 35 Open Bugs which now build, and can be marked CLOSED RAWHIDE: avr-libc: [u'555468'] clustermon: [u'564936'] condor: [u'564910'] eboard: [u'565137'] etherape: [u'564734'] gnome-applet-bubblemon: [u'564976'] gnome-hearts: [u'555484'] gsh: [u'22'] gurlchecker: [u'564684'] kasablanca: [u'565190'] kflickr: [u'564761'] ldtp: [u'555495'] ngspice: [u'565066'] nss: [u'539183'] nx: [u'539213'] par2cmdline: [u'564834'] perl-Module-Install: [u'555448'] perl-POE-Component-Child: [u'539114'] pida: [u'20'] pyflowtools: [u'555474'] PySBIG: [u'565051'] pyscript: [u'564816'] PythonCard: [u'564915'] python-pydns: [u'564878'] python-webtest: [u'565021'] razertool: [u'564813'] rpm: [u'565223'] skychart: [u'565168'] system-config-display: [u'564641'] util-vserver: [u'564692'] vfrnav: [u'538968'] wmfire: [u'564713'] xfhell: [u'564898'] xnec2c: [u'565187'] xorg-x11-fonts: [u'538928'] Total packages: 9602 Number failed to build: 472 Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 17 Leaving: 455 Of those expected to have worked... Without a bug filed: 408 -- 389-admin-1.1.11-0.6.rc1.fc14 (build/make) rmeggins,nhosoi,nkinder ElectricFence-2.2.2-27.fc12 (build/make) pmachata ImageMagick-6.6.2.1-11.fc14 (build/make) hubbitus,hubbitus,nmurray ModemManager-0.4-4.git20100720.fc14 (build/make) dcbw NetworkManager-openswan-0.8.0-5.20100411git.fc14 (build/make) avesh,avesh NetworkManager-openvpn-0.8.1-1.fc14 (build/make) dcbw,choeger,huzaifas,steve NetworkManager-pptp-0.8.1-1.fc14 (build/make) dcbw,dcbw NetworkManager-vpnc-0.8.1-1.fc14 (build/make) dcbw ORBit-0.5.17-29.fc14 (build/make) pghmcfc PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13 (build/make) rombobeorn R-BSgenome-1.14.2-1.fc12 (build/make) pingou Terminal-0.4.5-1.fc14 (build/make) kevin agave-0.4.7-1.fc14 (build/make) bonii alleggl-0.4.3-6.fc12 (build/make) jwrdegoede allegro-4.2.3-2.fc14 (build/make) jnovy,jwrdegoede alsa-plugins-1.0.22-1.fc13 (build/make) perex,npajkovs anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14 (build/make) rishi,rakesh antlr3-3.2-7.fc14 (build/make) walters,mjakubicek,zoeloelip apache-commons-beanutils-1.8.3-2.fc14 (build/make) sochotni,fnasser apache-commons-exec-1.0.1-2.fc13 (build/make) melmorabity apache-resource-bundles-2-3.fc13 (build/make) mef apanov-edrip-fonts-20100430-2.fc14 (build/make) nim,fonts-sig apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.2.2-2.fc14 (build/make) nim,fonts-sig apcupsd-3.14.8-1.fc13 (build/make) mhlavink aqute-bndlib-0.0.363-1.fc12 (build/make) fnasser,akurtakov,dbhole,jkeating,overholt arm-gp2x-linux-binutils-2.16.1-8.fc13 (build/make) jwrdegoede arm-gp2x-linux-glibc-2.3.6-7.fc12 (build/make) jwrdegoede at-spi-1.31.1-3.fc14 (build/make) mclasen atlas-3.8.3-18.fc14 (build/make) deji,deji audacity-1.3.12-0.4.beta.fc14 (build/make) gemi,dtimms autodir-0.99.9-9.fc12 (build/make) thias automake15-1.5-29.fc13.1 (build/make) karsten automake16-1.6.3-18.fc13.1 (build/make) karsten axis-1.4-4.1.fc14 (build/make) pcheung azureus-4.3.1.4-1.fc13 (build/make) djuran,langel banshee-1.7.4-1.fc14 (build/make) spot,chkr,spot beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14 (build/make) nushio,psytux bit-0.4.90-10.fc12 (build/make) rvinyard bluefish-2.0.1-1.fc14 (build/make) pghmcfc buildnumber-maven-plugin-1.0-0.4.b4.fc14 (build/make) weli,akurtakov busybox-1.15.1-7.fc14 (build/make) vda,vda cal10n-0.7.4-2.fc14 (build/make) akurtakov celestia-1.5.1-2.fc12 (build/make) steve,mmahut chunkd-0.6-0.8.gc49c6d38.fc14 (build/make) jgarzik,zaitcev clanbomber-1.05-12.fc12 (build/make) jwrdegoede classpathx-jaf-1.0-15.1.fc12 (build/make) devrim,dwalluck clipsmm-0.1.0-2.fc12 (build/make) rvinyard cmake-2.8.2-2.fc14 (build/make) orion,jreznik,pertusus,rdieter
Re: Desktop app maintainers: Please check for StartupNotify=true
Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:37:24 -0400, Colin wrote: Currently can only find: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files | Installed .desktop files MUST follow the desktop-entry-spec , paying | particular attention to validating correct usage of Name, GenericName, | Categories , StartupNotify entries. Explanation for the StartupNotify entry usage in the desktop-entry-spec [1] that is linked in the guidelines. Also, there are important details in the Startup Notification Protocol Specification [2]. [1] http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/desktop-entry-spec-latest.html [2] http://standards.freedesktop.org/startup-notification-spec/startup-notification-latest.txt FYI When the StartupNotify=true was specified in the desktop file of the NetBeans I've seen bugs in launching of the NetBeans' child processes (e.g FireFox [3]) due to the DESKTOP_STARTUP_ID environment variable. It was fixed in the NetBeans launcher by a patch [4] according to recommendations of the Startup Notification Protocol Specification. [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467546 [4] http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/netbeans/F-13/netbeans-6.8~40-ide-launcher.patch?view=markup Cheers, Victor -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: How to take ownership of a package in rawhide branch? - Was: [Taking ownership of the orphaned packages: bytelist, jcodings, jvyamlb]
Hi Chen, Chen Lei wrote: those packages were deprecated, so it should be reopened by cvs admin by you can take ownership. Thanks for the hint. I'll use cvs admin requests [1] for the packages. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests --- Victor -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: How to take ownership of a package in rawhide branch? - Was: [Taking ownership of the orphaned packages: bytelist, jcodings, jvyamlb]
Hi Kevin, Kevin Kofler wrote: Victor Vasilyev wrote: However, I don't see such buttons associated with the rawhide for all mentioned packages, i.e. bytelist, jcodings, and jvyamlb. How I can take ownership of the packages in the devel branch, but not in Fedora 11? Those packages have been marked as retired because they have been orphaned for more than 3 months. You need to submit new review requests, specifying that this are packages which were previously in Fedora and are being resurrected Thanks for clarification. OK I'll use the review process instructions [1] for the all three already filed review requests [2] [3] [4] and wait for someone to review the packages. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Contributor [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560169 [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560170 [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560172 Cheers, Victor -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
How to take ownership of a package in rawhide branch? - Was: [Taking ownership of the orphaned packages: bytelist, jcodings, jvyamlb]
I'm trying to complete the step 3 of the Claiming Ownership of an Orphaned Package Procedure [1] that says: 3. Press the Take Ownership button for each active branch that you want to maintain. However, I don't see such buttons associated with the rawhide for all mentioned packages, i.e. bytelist, jcodings, and jvyamlb. How I can take ownership of the packages in the devel branch, but not in Fedora 11? [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_an_Orphaned_Package_Procedure Thanks, Victor Victor Vasilyev wrote: Hi All, The NetBeans 6.8 [1] depends on some Java libraries whose packages have been marked as orphaned [2]. To resolve the issue and provide the feature in-time I'd like to take ownership of the following packages: - bytelist - Review Request #560169 [3] - jcodings - Review Request #560170 [4] - jvyamlb - Review Request #560172 [5] The spec files are updated and new SRPMs are prepared according to the current states of the corresponding projects. BTW Updating the packages is a step to reanimate JRuby on the Fedora platform. [6] [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NetBeans_6.8 [2] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2009-July/034863.html [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560169 [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560170 [5] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560172 [6] http://mohammed.morsi.org/blog/node/305 Cheers, Victor Vasilyev -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
