Re: Restore dmz-cursor-themes
Yes, I'm already a packager for Fedora for my programs and theme. I'm going to submit a review request. Le 16/02/2024 21:49, Jerry James a écrit : Hi Fabrice, On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 4:43 AM Fabrice wrote: Hi! I would like to become the maintainer of dmz-cursor-themes. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dmz-cursor-themes I would like to push an update from Debian, v0.4.5.1. Thank you for your interest in this package. Since it has been retired for more than 8 weeks, it will need to be reviewed as described here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/#claiming Are you currently a Fedora packager? If not, you will need to follow the procedure described here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/ Feel free to ask questions or ask for help on this mailing list or on https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/. Regards, -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Is there an official Fedora for WSL?
Hi I recently realized that Windows WSL works by actually installing a Linux distribution. However, I have not used it and don't know much of it. Is there an official branch of Fedora for WSL or a plan to create one? I guess it has to be somehow custom Fedora since not all Linux distros are supported out of the box. If I happen to use Windows in future for e.g. a project or something, I would love to have fedora by my side. -mehdi ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Any plans to include kotlin in Fedora
So I suppose if someone takes on Gradle again, it would be possible to add Kotlin to Fedora. But overall, it seems rather complicated. -Mehdi On Thu, Feb 13, 2020, 19:03 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > I think it boils down to having people to do the work, which is > > probably not an easy task. I'm also assuming we'd need a more > > up-to-date gradle package, which might not be a trivial task, and I > > suspect that the build system is probably full of "Fedora violations" > > between the need for an internet access, fetching pre-built > > dependencies, bundling some dependencies... > > The main issue is that the dependency between Gradle and Kotlin is > circular. > Gradle is actually blocking, among other things, on Kotlin being packaged, > and Kotlin is blocking on Gradle (which has been entirely retired because > its maintainers were unable to keep it up to date). See the recent > "Package > uses Gradle (retired) to build: what to do?" thread. > > Gradle also has a circular dependency of the same kind on its main > implementation language, Groovy. > > And of course, Gradle also has a trivial circular dependency on itself. > > And finally, there is also Scala code in Gradle now. I am not sure whether > the latest version of Scala can be built without Gradle or whether the > dependency is circular there too. > > Kevin Kofler > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Any plans to include kotlin in Fedora
Hi Kotlin is an open source project. Are there any plans to include its compiler in Fedora (if not already) repositories? Currently, it is installed manually on Linux to the best of my knowledge, but Mac systems already install it with HomeBrew. - Mehdi ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Any plans on maintaining Apache NetBeans
The flatpak packages seem huge in size (at least that's what is shown in the Gnome Software application). Also, for one, Flatpak version of Eclipse does not support built-in support. On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 4:12 AM Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 6:07 AM Code Zombie > wrote: > >> Currently at its version 11.2, Apache NetBeans is a great piece of >> development software. Is Fedora considering to add it to its packages? Does >> anyone already plan to maintain it or can I take it over? >> > > We (Eclipse maintainers in Fedora) are looking into using Flatpak instead ( > https://flathub.org/apps/details/org.eclipse.Java). There seems to be > Netbeans flatpak (https://flathub.org/apps/details/org.apache.netbeans). > I admit there are still issues we face both in Eclipse code and in > flatpak(portals) like https://github.com/flathub/org.eclipse.Java/issues/3 > but overall this has better ROI so consider trying it. > P.S. This is not trying to discourage you from packaging Netbeans as RPM > but rather a general warning that unless upstream developers are convinced > this is important delivery channel it's really touch to achieve it. > > >> >> - Mehdi >> ___ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> > > > -- > Alexander Kurtakov > Red Hat Eclipse Team > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Any plans on maintaining Apache NetBeans
What do you mean? The source code built successfully on my Fedora 31 system with JDK 11 (using ant). On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 3:22 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 05.02.2020 05:05, Code Zombie wrote: > > Is Fedora considering to add it to its packages? Does anyone already > > plan to maintain it or can I take it over? > > Currently impossible due to completely broken Java stack in Fedora. > > -- > Sincerely, > Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Any plans on maintaining Apache NetBeans
Currently at its version 11.2, Apache NetBeans is a great piece of development software. Is Fedora considering to add it to its packages? Does anyone already plan to maintain it or can I take it over? - Mehdi ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: lv2-sorcer is not installable
I hope the package gets unretired, because the way things are now, even dnf groupinstall "Audio Production" fails to work. - Mehdi On Sun, Jan 5, 2020, 15:11 Guido Aulisi wrote: > Il giorno dom, 05/01/2020 alle 12.21 +0100, Miro Hrončok ha scritto: > > On 03. 01. 20 19:24, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > The dep was provided by non-ntk, which got retired about half a > > > > year > > > > ago [1] after FTBFSing since F29 [2]. > > > > > > Isn't it great when the policy designed to > > > remove > > > breakage from the distribution actually CREATES breakage? Retiring > > > packages > > > with no regards to their reverse dependencies is just broken. It > > > had never > > > been done that way in the past, before Miro's recent crackdown, > > > because it > > > simply defeats all common sense. > > > > As a matter of fact, the policy was changed recently, so depending > > package > > maintainers MUST get notifications. The Fedora 31 round was > > unfortunate, mostly > > because nobody got properly notified. I have devoted a great amount > > of energy > > and time to make it better for next rounds. I hope it worked. Only > > couple of > > packages are to be retired, where the maintainers simply don't care > > anymore with > > only one dependent package: > > > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/YRLNHZSV4U47A3MDWIU6MUANVMPEFKD2/ > > > > For the F31 crackdown - it's not like a retired package cannot ever > > be > > unretired. It has been more than 8 weeks now, but I gladly re-review > > a package > > that got retired, if new maintainers pop up. Unlike you, I actually > > believe > > packages must be maintained in order to be kept. > > I'm working for unretiring non-ntk, I think I can file a new review > request in one week, as soon as I come back home; I'm already working > on it. > > > The solution is not to stop orphaning/retiring FTBFS packages, the > > solution is > > to get "broken deps" notifications working again: > > > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/RBV3UTSPIGW3TOZJSYTXCZMRV4QBR7X5/ > > Ciao > Guido > > FAS: tartina > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
lv2-sorcer is not installable
Hi lv2-sorcer cannot be installed on Fedora 31. Seems like the libntk lib needed by the package is not provided by any packages. The full installation error is as follows: ``` sudo dnf install lv2-sorcer Last metadata expiration check: 0:32:35 ago on Fri 03 Jan 2020 08:00:41 AM EST. Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides libntk.so.1()(64bit) needed by lv2-sorcer-1.1-2320131104git18e6891.fc31.x86_64 - nothing provides libntk_images.so.1()(64bit) needed by lv2-sorcer-1.1-2320131104git18e6891.fc31.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) ``` - Mehdi ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 31 Does Not Use Swap Well?
Lukasz I am not sure if this is related to virtualization as I installed Windows 10 on VirtualBox and the performance was quite fine, but as soon as Android VM starts up, the performance suffers painfully, almost every event (e.g. mouse) has 2-5 seconds delay in response. I tried a virtual device (Android M) different from the current Android Q image, but performance is still very bad. The situation gets worse when the build and installation (deploying to the virtual device) starts. I'm going to find a way to evaluate my disk performance to see if that's the issue. - Mehdi On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 5:12 PM Łukasz Posadowski wrote: > Data Sun, 10 Nov 2019 15:41:26 -0500 > Code Zombie napisał(a): > > > I recently installed a fresh Fedora 31 in order to improve > > performance. I have started to have a new problem. When my memory > > fills up when launching an Android emulator, the system starts acting > > very slowly and becomes quite unresponsive. [...] > > That is interesting. I also noticed choppy performance with Virtualbox, > so it may be something with virtualisation and not memory related. The > VM is doing fine, but host is a little slower during VM updates, or > other cpu/disk intensive tasks. I know this is normal, but I didn't > even noticed VM upgrades on Fedora 30. > > Could You do something really heavy on Android VM in a background for > 10 minutes and observe the hosts performance? > > -- > Łukasz Posadowski > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 31 Does Not Use Swap Well?
Some more info following my last Email, Swap is 8GB (equal to memory) and the hard disk is a 2-year old 250 GB SSD. On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 3:41 PM Code Zombie wrote: > > Hi, > I recently installed a fresh Fedora 31 in order to improve performance. I > have started to have a new problem. When my memory fills up when launching > an Android emulator, the system starts acting very slowly and becomes quite > unresponsive. I used to fill both memory and swap close to 100% without > much degraded performance, but now I wonder if there has been some changes > in Fedora memory management causing this? And after all that, once I close > the emulator and free up some memory out of the total 8GB physical, the > computer starts to breathe again and back to normal. > > - Mehdi > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 31 Does Not Use Swap Well?
Hi, I recently installed a fresh Fedora 31 in order to improve performance. I have started to have a new problem. When my memory fills up when launching an Android emulator, the system starts acting very slowly and becomes quite unresponsive. I used to fill both memory and swap close to 100% without much degraded performance, but now I wonder if there has been some changes in Fedora memory management causing this? And after all that, once I close the emulator and free up some memory out of the total 8GB physical, the computer starts to breathe again and back to normal. - Mehdi ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Blender for Fedora 31 does not support multimedia?
I think you are right Martin. Blender has no runtime settings that I am aware of for codecs. - Mehdi On Fri, Nov 1, 2019, 4:19 PM Martin Kolman wrote: > On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 00:51 +, long27km wrote: > > Why isn't there an option to install other repos codecs and impls ( i know > the technical answer) ? I thought Fedora was now supposed to be focused on > being developer friendly. Dev's could just install another distro of the os > that allows licenses like debian/ubuntu... except maybe I still would > anyway since I'd have less trouble with those repos recently (re: x64 > requires flatpak/winepak). These growing pains are understandable, but this > is getting to be a bigger issue if we cannot simply install and use the > tools we need. > > As I understand this (and actual Blender maintainers & other more > knoledgable pepople plese correct me if I am completely wrong) this is due > to an architectural limitation of Blender - you either build against ffmpeg > at build time and have multimedia support or not build against ffmpeg and > don't have multimedia support. Basically there is no runtime plugin > support, like in other applications that can use Gstreamer and other > mechanisms to query available codecs and use them if they are installed. > > IIRC Blender is not the only affected application, some even have ffmpeg > as a hard dependency and can't be thus packaged for main Fedora repos at > all. > > In any case, adding plugin support is on most if not all such cases a > signifficant undertaking - unlikely something Fedora maintainers of such > package can pull off, not to mention upstream potetially not being > interested in accepting to such patches, that effectively increase their > maintenance bruden by adding another codepath for codec handling. > > > -- > *From:* Luya Tshimbalanga > *Sent:* Thursday, October 31, 2019 4:58 PM > *To:* devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > *Subject:* Re: Blender for Fedora 31 does not support multimedia? > > > Blender in Fedora repository is built with ffpmeg support disabled by > default for legal reasons. Negativo which is one of co-maintainers provides > nearly identical version with FFmpeg enabled accessible via > fedora-multimedia branch. > > https://negativo17.org/repos > > Make sure to keep that repo disabled to avoid conflict with rpmfusion. > > Luya > On 2019-10-31 11:09 a.m., Code Zombie wrote: > > Thanks Luya, > I have all ffmpeg and gstreamer codecs installed. However, I think blender > was installed by OpenShot before I actually installed ffmpeg and gstreamer > codecs. > So, it might be the reason why it does not play videos or music. But, > reinstalling blender didn't help. Never had this issue before. > - Mehdi > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:26 AM Luya Tshimbalanga > wrote: > > > On 2019-10-31 5:05 a.m., Code Zombie wrote: > > Hi > > > > It seems that Blender 2.8 on Fedora 31 does not support sound and > > video playback and export. > > Does anyone have the same issue? Is that normal on Fedora 31? > > > > - Mehdi > > > Hello Mehda, > > Blender requires ffmpeg which cannot be legally included in Fedora > repository to effectively use multimedia due to US patents law. One of > best approach is either get ffmpeg without the offending codecs or > enable an alternative like gstreamer which is beyond the scope of > packaging process. > > ___ > > devel mailing list -- > > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > To unsubscribe send an email to > > devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > > List Guidelines: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Blender for Fedora 31 does not support multimedia?
I think I am going to switch to the flatpak version. Last time I remember I used it it had all multimedia support by default. This way I would not have to fight between rpmfusion and negativo repos. But, I still don't understand given that ffmpeg is all open-source, what prevents fedora from including it? - Mehdi On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 7:59 PM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Blender in Fedora repository is built with ffpmeg support disabled by > default for legal reasons. Negativo which is one of co-maintainers provides > nearly identical version with FFmpeg enabled accessible via > fedora-multimedia branch. > > https://negativo17.org/repos > > Make sure to keep that repo disabled to avoid conflict with rpmfusion. > > Luya > On 2019-10-31 11:09 a.m., Code Zombie wrote: > > Thanks Luya, > I have all ffmpeg and gstreamer codecs installed. However, I think blender > was installed by OpenShot before I actually installed ffmpeg and gstreamer > codecs. > So, it might be the reason why it does not play videos or music. But, > reinstalling blender didn't help. Never had this issue before. > - Mehdi > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:26 AM Luya Tshimbalanga > wrote: > >> >> On 2019-10-31 5:05 a.m., Code Zombie wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> > It seems that Blender 2.8 on Fedora 31 does not support sound and >> > video playback and export. >> > Does anyone have the same issue? Is that normal on Fedora 31? >> > >> > - Mehdi >> > >> Hello Mehda, >> >> Blender requires ffmpeg which cannot be legally included in Fedora >> repository to effectively use multimedia due to US patents law. One of >> best approach is either get ffmpeg without the offending codecs or >> enable an alternative like gstreamer which is beyond the scope of >> packaging process. >> >> -- >> Luya Tshimbalanga >> Fedora Design Team >> Fedora Design Suite maintainer >> ___ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > -- > Luya Tshimbalanga > Fedora Design Team > Fedora Design Suite maintainer > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Blender for Fedora 31 does not support multimedia?
Thanks Luya, I have all ffmpeg and gstreamer codecs installed. However, I think blender was installed by OpenShot before I actually installed ffmpeg and gstreamer codecs. So, it might be the reason why it does not play videos or music. But, reinstalling blender didn't help. Never had this issue before. - Mehdi On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:26 AM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > > On 2019-10-31 5:05 a.m., Code Zombie wrote: > > Hi > > > > It seems that Blender 2.8 on Fedora 31 does not support sound and > > video playback and export. > > Does anyone have the same issue? Is that normal on Fedora 31? > > > > - Mehdi > > > Hello Mehda, > > Blender requires ffmpeg which cannot be legally included in Fedora > repository to effectively use multimedia due to US patents law. One of > best approach is either get ffmpeg without the offending codecs or > enable an alternative like gstreamer which is beyond the scope of > packaging process. > > -- > Luya Tshimbalanga > Fedora Design Team > Fedora Design Suite maintainer > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Blender for Fedora 31 does not support multimedia?
Hi It seems that Blender 2.8 on Fedora 31 does not support sound and video playback and export. Does anyone have the same issue? Is that normal on Fedora 31? - Mehdi ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaning eclipse-cdt
Hey Jeff What do you mean by modules? Regards Mehdi On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 9:22 PM Jeff Johnston wrote: > The eclipse-cdt package is being superseded by modules and it has missing > dependencies such that it FTBFS so I am orphaning this project. > > -- Jeff J. > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Why Redhat and Fedora create rpms differently
Hi Just trying to get started with packaging. I started with a pretty big app, and looking through tutorials, it seems Fedora and Redhat use different ways to create rpms. I am a bit confused, seems complicated. Which one will work on Fedora? Some mentioned docs : Fedora: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/creating-rpm-packages/ Redhat: https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2019/03/18/rpm-packaging-guide-creating-rpm/ I think it would be nice if the example apps were more realistic, e.g. considering dependencies, etc. Best regards Mehdi ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: No More LMMS Updates to Fedora?
Thanks Adam for the information. By the way I meant version 1.2, as v2.0 does not even exist. I'll try contacting the current maintainer as you suggested. Best regards On Sun, Oct 20, 2019, 7:47 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2019-10-19 at 14:35 -0400, Code Zombie wrote: > > It seems that Fedora repo has been providing lmms version 1.1.3 roughly > > released three years ago. I'm curious if that is there is no one to > > maintain the package or there are legal problems with the new versions of > > LMMS (currently 2.0) disallowing update of the package to new versions. I > > would appreciate any enlightments. > > There appears to be active maintenance of the package going on, it is > not just getting automated rebuilds (I've obfuscated the email address > here): > > * Wed May 01 2019 Thomas Moschny - > 1.1.3-13 > - Use bundled swh ladspa plugins (#1703804). > > * Fri Feb 15 2019 Thomas Moschny - > 1.1.3-12 > - Remove obsolete patch, fix FTBFS (#1675328). > > so I'm gonna guess either 2.0 does indeed have legal issues, or there's > another specific reason not to update to it. (Or 1.2.0 for that > matter). You could try mailing him directly and asking... > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > http://www.happyassassin.net > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
No More LMMS Updates to Fedora?
It seems that Fedora repo has been providing lmms version 1.1.3 roughly released three years ago. I'm curious if that is there is no one to maintain the package or there are legal problems with the new versions of LMMS (currently 2.0) disallowing update of the package to new versions. I would appreciate any enlightments. Best regards mehdi ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Way to visualize where Fedora contributors are around the world?
Hi. I like the idea. Is that really needed? What are the benefits to such a map? On Fri, Oct 11, 2019, 10:18 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > Just a random thought I had but I actually have no idea which > contributors/packagers are closest to me here in Mississippi, USA. > > That got me thinking it would be pretty neat if a map could be > automagically creating showing where everyone is. Wouldn't need exact > addresses for privacy reasons but something that gets you close like a zip > code (or equivalent). > > Thoughts? > > Thanks, > Richard > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
Hi Here's my output (I am running F30): Problem 1: problem with installed package eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.fc30.noarch - eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides jgit = 5.3.0-5.fc31 needed by eclipse-jgit-5.3.0-5.fc31.noarch Problem 2: package crypto-utils-2.5-4.fc29.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package crypto-utils-2.5-4.fc29.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.28.0), but none of the providers can be installed - perl-libs-4:5.28.2-439.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package crypto-utils-2.5-4.fc29.x86_64 - package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-439.module_f31+6019+b24e098f.x86_64 is excluded - package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-439.module_f31+6050+a462f342.x86_64 is excluded Problem 3: package xfce4-hamster-plugin-1.7-21.fc30.x86_64 requires hamster-time-tracker, but none of the providers can be installed - hamster-time-tracker-2.0-0.16.rc1.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package xfce4-hamster-plugin-1.7-21.fc30.x86_64 Problem 4: problem with installed package gnome-builder-3.32.3-1.fc30.x86_64 - package gnome-builder-3.34.0-1.fc31.x86_64 requires libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnome-builder-3.33.92-1.fc31.x86_64 requires libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gnome-builder-3.32.3-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded - package libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded Problem 5: problem with installed package kf5-ktexteditor-5.59.0-1.fc30.x86_64 - package kf5-ktexteditor-5.61.0-1.fc31.x86_64 requires libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - kf5-ktexteditor-5.59.0-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded - package libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded Problem 6: problem with installed package libgit2-glib-0.28.0.1-1.fc30.x86_64 - package libgit2-glib-0.28.0.1-3.fc31.x86_64 requires libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libgit2-glib-0.28.0.1-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded - package libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) Best regards On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:55 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run [*]: > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please > report it against the appropriate package. Or > against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > Fedora 31. Please check existing reports first: > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > Thank you > > [*] this command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. You may also run `dnf > upgrade` before running this command. > > -- > Miroslav Suchy, RHCA > Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
