Releasing ownership

2013-01-28 Thread lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
I am releasing ownership of the following packages due to lack of time
chm2pdf -- A tool to convert CHM files to PDF files
emacs-slime -- The superior lisp interaction mode for emacsgnome-guitar --
A small suite of applications for the guitaristgriffith -- Media collection
managerphatch -- Photo batch processorpython-chm -- Python package for CHM
files handlingstow -- Manage the installation of software packages from
sourcexcftools -- Command-line tools for extracting information from XCF
files
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Claiming ownership of python-chm

2012-08-07 Thread lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
I am taking ownership of python-chm. This package is needed for chm2pdf.

-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: emacspeak: hearing for a new owner

2012-07-30 Thread lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
I will take it.

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com wrote:

 Hi,

 For a long time - well since pre-Fedora history ;) -
 I have maintained the emacspeak package
 (see https://code.google.com/p/emacspeak/).

 In the past I generally found time to update it for
 each Fedora release (it is not really much work)
 but I don't actually use it myself at all or have
 the hardware to test (ever) so I think it would be
 better if someone else interested would take over
 the package.  Or maybe noone really uses it in Fedora?
 (I just updated it in rawhide for the first time since
 end of 2008 without a single bug report!  oops - did anyone notice? :)
 and also just added it to URM now so hopefully it can be kept
 more up to date.

 So does anyone use it?  Is anyone keen to maintain it?
 I can still help to maintain it a bit longer but if noone is
 really using it maybe better to orphan?

 I would appreciate a CC if you reply since I sometimes
 miss devel list.

 Thanks, Jens
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel




-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Taking ownership of xcftools

2012-02-10 Thread lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
This package is needed by phatch
-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: review swap for picolisp

2012-01-21 Thread lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
Hello,

I have a Haskell package for review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Here is the packaging draft
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell that lists and
explains the macros used

I am taking up picolisp for review.

On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda callka...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi,

 There is a package that I'm willing for a review swap, picolisp - a
 Lisp interpreter
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294

 --
 Best Regards,

 Kalpa Pathum Welivitigoda
 http://about.me/callkalpa
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel




-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [Status] - Fedora Haskell SIG

2011-09-25 Thread lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
This mail was intended for Haskell SIG list. Sorry for the  devel wide mail.

On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 11:25 AM, lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 
lakshminaras2...@gmail.com wrote:

 1) gtk2hs updates available on rawhide (0.12.1)
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739876

 2) ghc-rpm-macros related bug on f14,f15 fixed. New builds of haskell
 packages should have the correct rpm hash information from now on

 3) Pending reviews requiring owners

 ghc-wai - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736602 (need by
 yesod)
 ghc-Agda - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710031 (needed by
 Agda package)

 There are other reviews that require owners and haven't been mentioned
 above. If you have reviews that need an owner, please send an email to the
 list.

 Thanks
 --
 Regards
 Lakshmi Narasimhan T V




-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Status] - Fedora Haskell SIG

2011-09-24 Thread lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
1) gtk2hs updates available on rawhide (0.12.1)
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739876

2) ghc-rpm-macros related bug on f14,f15 fixed. New builds of haskell
packages should have the correct rpm hash information from now on

3) Pending reviews requiring owners

ghc-wai - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736602 (need by yesod)
ghc-Agda - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710031 (needed by
Agda package)

There are other reviews that require owners and haven't been mentioned
above. If you have reviews that need an owner, please send an email to the
list.

Thanks
-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[HEADS UP]Upgrading ghc-hslogger to 1.1.5 in rawhide

2011-08-27 Thread lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
I will be updating ghc-hslogger to 1.1.5.

-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

ghc-hslogger - License change from LGPLv2 to BSD

2011-08-27 Thread lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
License of ghc-hslogger has changed from LGPLv2 to BSD.

-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Swap reviews: Askbot friends

2011-04-25 Thread lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
I have taken python-coffin and django-kombu

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi

 I have been working on packaging Askbot (demo at http://askbot.org) and
 it's many dependencies with the hope of eventually getting a instance
 running in Fedora Infrastructure.  It is written in Python and Django.
 Except for Askbot itself which would require a more detailed review,
 everything else should be fairly easy.   Thanks

 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Askbot

 django-keyedcache - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697492

 django-robots -  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696516

 django-countries - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696485

 django-celery -  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697483

 django-kombu - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696527

 python-coffin - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699335

 askbot  - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699336

 Rahul
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel




-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Review Request!

2011-04-22 Thread lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
I have taken starcal.

On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah hedayat@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi all,
 I have 3 review requests waiting for someone to take over for about 2
 months. Unfortunately, currently I cannot offer  review swaps, but I
 hope some of you will take them :P

 These are the review requests:
 os-prober - Probes disks on the system for installed operating systems
 URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678442
 (This can be used to generate Grub menu entries automatically, and
 should be relatively easy to review (IMHO))

 starcal - A desktop calendar with Gregorian, Jalali and Hijri support
 URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679133

 Saaghar - A Cross-Platform Persian Poetry Software
 URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678634

 Thanks in advance,
 Hedayat

 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel




-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Orphaning packages

2011-03-11 Thread lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
I will take griffith and stow

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Vivek Shah boni.vi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
I have orphaned a few packages owing to lack of time and non-usage.

 1. struts
 2. griffith
 3. xqf
 4. gquilt
 5. quilt
 6. stow

 Thanks and Regards,
 Vivek
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel




-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Orphaning phatch

2011-02-12 Thread lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
I can take ownership.

Thanks
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Nicoleau Fabien
nicoleau.fab...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi,

 I'm orphaning phatch (photo batch processor).

 I think I'm not the good maintener for it. First, I'm not using it
 anymore, and it's written in python, a language I don't know enought to
 help resolving bugs.

 Some bugs are open, related to an incompatibility with pyexiv2. It's
 reported upstream and will be fixed in further releases.

 Regards,

 Fabien Nicoleau
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel




-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Haskell packaging questions

2011-01-28 Thread lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
Hi Andrew,

Please have a look at the review template here
[1]http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/haskell_review_template.txt. Some
items from the Package review guidelines which do not apply are
marked [NA].

The cabal2spec program generates the template for the .spec file from the
.cabal file. Then the packager modifies certain values and thats about it.
The macros used in the template come from /etc/rpm/macros.ghc. There are
cases were there is a need to add some files not picked by the macros and
that has been done. Eg
[2]http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-gtk/ghc-gtk.spec

For haskell packaging/review related queries ,  you could also mail to
fedora-haskell-l...@redhat.com  or ask at #fedora-haskell .

-Thanks

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Andrew McNabb amcn...@mcnabbs.org wrote:

 I recently came across an issue in a package review where I would
 appreciate guidance.  In particular, I have never dealt with Haskell
 packages before, and I haven't been able to find enough detail in the
 Haskell Packaging Guidelines to answer my questions:

 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Haskell

 It seems that there's a tool called cabal2spec that autogenerates spec
 files for Haskell programs.  However, the spec files that it outputs are
 a little unusual.

 The spec file I'm reviewing has no %package sections and no %files
 sections.  Instead, there is a reference to a %{?ghc_lib_package}
 macro that implicitly defines the package and two subpackages.  The
 Haskell Packaging Guidelines don't seem to describe how all of the magic
 works, so I'm not quite sure what standards I'm supposed to use in my
 review.  Here's a link to the package request:

 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662258

 It looks like other Haskell libraries are packaged in a similar way, but
 it's enough different from most packages that the Package Review
 Guidelines don't seem to cleanly apply.  I would appreciate advice on
 how to proceed.  Thanks.

 --
 Andrew McNabb
 http://www.mcnabbs.org/andrew/
 PGP Fingerprint: 8A17 B57C 6879 1863 DE55  8012 AB4D 6098 8826 6868
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel




-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Review swap: 665877, 663244, 670701

2011-01-18 Thread lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
I am taking ghc-ansi-terminal

Here is mine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=ghc-process-leksah

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi,

 I would like to swap reviews. Here are mine:

 * freeDiameter: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665877

 * CUnit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663244

 * ghc-ansi-terminal: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670701

 Regards,

 SK

 --
 Shakthi Kannan
 http://www.shakthimaan.com
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel




-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Review Swaps

2011-01-10 Thread lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
Hello Peter,
I have one gnome-guitar (gtk mono based) at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663018

I will take erlang-ebloom and erlang-skerl .

Thanks

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello All!

 I would like to swap reviews. Here are mine ones (all of them are
 Erlang-related):

 * erlang-ebloom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652616
 * erlang-skerl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652648
 * erlang-luke https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652585
 * erlang-webmachine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652546

 All of these packages seems to be in a good shape, so it won't be so
 difficult to review them.

 --
 With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel




-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Orphaned chm2pdf

2010-12-29 Thread lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
Hi,
I can take it up.

Thanks

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 I just orphaned chm2pdf, it is a converter from chm format to pdf
 format. Any one interested can pick it up.

 Kushal

 --
 http://fedoraproject.org
 http://kushaldas.in
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel




-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: gnome-guitar in f14?

2010-11-28 Thread lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
I would like to take up gnome-guitar package.
The last update happened in October 2009. According to the wiki, it would be
necessary to submit the package for re-review.  Please confirm whether my
understanding is correct.

Thanks


On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 4:26 PM, François Cami fdc-li...@fcami.net wrote:

 On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:54 AM, lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
 lakshminaras2...@gmail.com wrote:
  There is no gnome-guitar package in f14. Previous releases do have it.
 Any
  reasons why it has not been rebuilt for f14?

 Because it was orphaned and no one picked it up.
 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-August/140539.html

 See also https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/gnome-guitar

 Cheers

 François
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel




-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Taking ownership of haddock

2010-10-27 Thread lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
Hello,
I intend to take ownership of haddock package. It is required for one other
package(leksah, an IDE for Haskell) that I am planning to submit.

-- 
Lakshmi Narasimhan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel